The news in this publi cation is released for the press on receipt. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA NEWS LETTER Published Weekly by the University of North Caro lina for its University Ex tension Division. AUGUST 2, 1922 GHAPEI. HDl., N. C. VOL. Vm, NO. 37 KIitori«l Il.>.rd . E. 0. Branson, 8. H. Hobbs, Jr., L. R. Wilson, E. w. Knight, D. D. Carroll, J. B, Bnllltl, H. W. Odnm, Entered as second-claas matter November 14,1914, at the Postoffice at Chapel Hill, N, C., under the act of August 24,1918 NEGRO TAXABLES IN CAROLINA NEGRO TAXPAYERS The negroes of North Carolina have right around one hundred ten million dollars of taxable wealth on the county tax lists; which is nearly exactly five times the total in 1910. On an average the state over, they pay one dollar of every twenty-five paid into the local tax funds of the state. They pay nearly nothing into the state treasury to sup port state departments, state institu tions, and state enterprises; so (1) be cause their' individual properties and businesses are small, and (2) because legal exemptions in North Carolina are so large as to relieve them of taxes on inheritances and personal incomes. The same is true of taxes on negro corpora tion incomes. The exceptions are not able but they are very few. The auto-. mobile registration fees they pay cover the largest contribution they make to state support. Their per capita taxables in 1921 averaged $135, against $34 in 1910. Their gains in taxable wealth in re cent years have been made mainly in the town and city centers of the state. Very few negro tenants moved up into farm ownership during the last census period in North Carolina—only 834 all' told, against an increase of more than five thousand farms by white farm own- Betrayed By Prosperity The negroes were betrayed into ex travagance and wanton waste by the flush times of the war period. The more primitive people are, white or black, the less they save and invest in homes and farms and productive busi nesses. Gains in taxable wealth indi cate substantial gains in real civiliza tion, and the negro race shows a steady march forward in property ownership | since the middle sixties in every south ern state. But in 1910-20 the ratio of negro farm owners in North Carolina suf fered a decrease—from percent. The same fact appears in other cotton-belt states. It is the first halt in the progress—the real progress —of the American negro since the war between the States. Nevertheless nearly one-third of all our negro farmers are farm owners, not tenants, and they own a million one hundred sixty thousand acres. Put to gether, the farm land they own today in North Carolina makes an area as large as Mecklenburg, Gaston, Lincoln, and Cabarrus counties, with a hundred thousand acres to spare. In two couh- ties of NortbCarolina, the negro farm owners outnumber the white farm owners—in Warren by 188 and in Hali fax by 38. The farms are smaller, of course, but the number of negro farm, owners is larger than the number of white farm owners in these two coun ties. The per capita taxable wealth of the negroes ranges from $237 in Alleghany, where the negroes are fewer than five in the hundred of population, to $53 ir Cherokee, another mountain county, where they are only two in the hundred of population. See the table elsewhere. Their best showing is made in Alleghany, Durham, Guilford, Buncombe, and Warren, in the order named. Forty counties are above the state average of $135 per capita, and in all but five of these counties the whites are in the majority. The exceptions are Warren, Craven, Hertford, Bertie, and Greene, where the taxpaying negroes are mainly farm owners. , Two Different Problems Students of the negro are not yet properly aware of the fact that the negro problem in general is two not one: (1) the negroes when thinly scat tered among white majorities, where they feel the steady upward pull of the surrounding superior mass, and (2) the negroes when massed in solid black areas, as in nearly 300 of the 800 cotton belt counties of the South, where the superior negro feels the steady down ward pull of the surrounding inferior mass. As a rule the amassing of property by negroes is most rapid in white coun ties. Here their ten-year gains are most amazing, and here it is that hard- won property is best preserved and in creased by succeeding generations. In the black counties the property amassed by a worthy negro is apt to be rapid ly dissipated by sons and daughters in fected by the improvident humors and habits of the surrounding negro mass es. The salvation of the superior negroes in a black county lies in segre- gation~in a social quarantine area, as Mound Bayou for instance, a prosperous negro city in a Mississippi delta county where the blacks outnumber the whites seven to one. In this little negro city are gathered the pick of the negroes of Bolivar county. The banks, the stores, and the industries are all owned and operated by enterprising negroes. Jt is a center of negro aristocracy protect ed from the downward pull of the reckless negro masses of the Delta country. A White Man's Problem Along with these two characteristic negro problems, there is a white man’s problem in the cotton-belt counties of the South. It is the problem of white tenant farmers in counties like Warren-and Halifax where white and black croppers in something like equal numbers live and work side by side. And where two races with different standards of living struggle for exis tence side by side, the race with the lower standards wins out unless the superior race is defended by superior j industry, intelligence, and skill. This I law of life is as nearly universal as any I other we know in social scien^ce. It works with equal certainty in the mill industries of the North and East, in the Polish farm areas of the Connecticut Valley, in the Japanese and Armenian districts of California, and in the cot ton-belt counties of the South. The conditions of cotton farm tenancy are hard, but negroes thrive on condi tions that destroy the whites; which ac counts for the increase of negro farm owners in the South in 1900-1910, in ratios ranging from one and a half to seven and a half times the ratios of in- 32.7 to 29.2 i crease of white farm owners. * Race protection by increase of intel ligence and skill—that’s the white farm tenant’s defense in Warren and Hali fax. These counties in particular need consolidated schools in county-wide systems, with teacherage's and motor transportation trucks. And they must be quick in their decision about this means of defense, else the farm prop erties of white owners will soon be so deteriorated and social conditions so stagnant in country areas that the farmland will inevitably pass into the hands of negro farm owners. There, are nine other Carolina counties in which country civilization is in similar peril— Anson, Scotland, Hoke, Northampton, Hertford, Bertie, Edgecombe, Pitt, and Craven. What Property Means Property is what one may call one’s very own. When self-acquired it sig nifies (1) industry, the power to toil terribly in steady-gaited sort, (2) thrift, which is prudential foresight coupled with the power of self-denial, (8) sa gacity or the clear-headed ability to think things through to a remote end, and (4) integrity-honesty, truthful ness, a sense of moral obligation, so briety and the like. These are the qualities in a man that result in prop erty. The lack of any one of these will make anl will keep him an underling, They are signs of sterling worth in a man, white or black. They are signs of essential civilization. The qualities that produce property are the qualities that produce capital which is surplus property ready for use in the creation of other property. Christianity as mode of life means character, character produces capital, and capital produces civilization. Western civilization, such as it is, is the creature of capital, and the negro is winning his way out of jungleism into civilization in terms of property owner ship. And there is no other way. It is necessarily the way of struggle—strug gle within himself for mastery over himself and struggle with outward, un toward circumstances. The negro as a race will never stand really possessed of anything that he does not win worth ily for himself and by himself. Such progress as he has made as a race must be reckoned in property ownership. Aside from property possessions in Released week beginning July 31 KNOW NORTH CAROLINA Forest Protection North Carolina with an area of 31,000,000 acres still contains ap proximately 19,500,000 acres of forest lands. Roughly speaking, three-fourths of the mountain section, one-half of the piedmont, and two-thirds of the coastal plain region are still in woods. There is probably a slightly larger area growing softwoods, chiefly pine, than growing hardwoods, Much of this forest has been so cut and burnt for generations that there is little or no growing timber on the land and only slight prospect of any returning, unless fires are kept out. The U. S. Census figures show that more than 50 per cent of the average North Carolina farm con sists of woodland, yet most of this area is yielding less return per an num to the, owners than it was twenty-five years ago. The demand for lumber, ties, poles, pulpwood, veneer, cordwood, etc., increases rapidly from year to year. Our furni ture industry, the largest in the South, is having to go further and further for its supply of hardwoods and much of our building material is now coming from the extreme South and even from the Pacific Coast States. Prices are high now and undoubtedly will be higher. We must put our idle land to work. How can we regenerate the forest which is already destroyed and keep productive that which is to be cut? Several steps will probably be necessary with those lands which now contain no profitable [stand of timber. Some may have to be plant- ed'to trees again; other lands may be seeded from surrounding trees and the young growth gradually form a forest. A prerequisite to every forestry operation, however, is the prevention of fires. Forest fires have destroyed at least one million dollars’ worth of property in North Carolina per annum for many years past, and only recently has the area burned over each year begun to de cline. The hopelessness of trying to secure adequate young growth to produce a profitable crop of timber with fires running over the area every year or two must be apparent to all. It is no use planting or pro viding seed trees or encouraging young growth if fires are to come a- long and destroy it. Both the State and Federal Gover^nments are agreed that forest fires must be prevented and they are now starting out in earnest to do this. The counties are being asked to cooperate with the state in fbrest fire prevention and a number of them are taking up this work in earnest. The people are also being urged to do their part by being more careful in the use of fire. Only when all interests work together for fire prevention can the forests of the state yield satisfac tory returns.—N. C. Geological and Economic Survey. homes, farms, and businesses, Ford cars and silk shirts mean little or noth ing or worse, for either blacks or whites. The hope of the negro lies in the ownership of homes and farms, in barns and bank balances, far more than in spelling books and ballot boxes. Home owning negroes are everywhere a com munity asset. Property ownership teth ers a negro to law and order better than all the courts. It is the landless, homeless negro—the restless, roying, irresponsible negro whose habit is to roost on a new perch every night—who disgraces his race and endangers the civilization of the South. We hold firmly to the belief that civi lization for any man or any race is rooted and grounded in the home-own ing, home-loving, home-defending in stincts. No landless, homeless race, white or black, can be socialized, civi lized, or Christianized. An economic interpretation of negro progress will be found in more elabo rate detail in a chapter by E. C. ^^ran- son, in The Human Way. Students of the Negro Problem can get it from The Baker Taylor Co., 354 Fourth Avenue, New York. A JOHNSTON COUNTY BOOK Two. young men at the University have written a complete history of Johnston county as part of their college course. This is a grand idea and the faculty of that state institution are to be congratulated upon the work they are doing. This will be'valuable infor mation to the people and it will make the work of these two young students worth something to the entire state. This work required hard study' and also some generosity on the ))art of some people of the county. There is some expense attached to the under taking and it is the duty of every busi ness man living in the county to contri bute toward this expense by taking ad vertising space in the booklet. It is the very best advertising medium in the county. They will be mailed into prac tically every home in the county and the merchants and other business men who take space in the booklet will se cure several extra copies.' If you know of any important event taking place in the history of this county, or if you know anything about the county, jot it down and mail it to Messrs. George Ragsdale or William Sanders at Chapel Hill. It will be greatly appreciated. The booklets are expected to be ready for distribution by the first of August. Again we say it is a grand thing and we want the people to aid in helping the young men out in this wonderful undertaking. It iff the Carolina way of doing things which will be beneficial to the state. — Smithfield Observer. BREAKING ALL RECORDS It may not be news to say that North Carolina is breaking' all her past records in the construction of highways. It is not yet generally understood, however, that at the end of this year the State • Highway Commission will have com pleted or under contract improved roads costing $25,000,000, an astounding rec ord for two years’ work. No wonder other states are sending engineers into North Carolina to see how it is done. The Commission, sup ported by Governor Morrison and the Council of State, has already surpassed its expectations and is pressing to a goal the attainment of which will end forever whatever reputation this state may have had as a Rip Van IVinkle. Such movements as we now witness in road-building and in the improve ment of schools and welfare itstitutiona do not develop in a day. Aycock, Craig, and Bickett and those who stood by them in their campaigns for better schools and improved highways share in the glory of this fuller day. Those to whom has come the task of carrying forward great state enterprises have today a tremenduous opportunity, and they have eyes to see it and hands for its fulfillment.—Asheville Citizen. NEGRO TAXABLE WEALTH IN CAROLINA Per Capita in 1921 Based (1) on the 1921 Report of the state Tax Commissioner, and (2) on correspondence with the County Registers of Deeds. Total Negro taxables $110,000,000 in round numbers in 1921, or $135 per capita, against $34 per capita in 1910. Their taxable properties were multiplied five-fold in eleven years. ' On an average the negro pays one dollar of every twenty-five dollars of the tax fund for local government. They pay nearly nothing to support state government, because their indi vidual properties and businesses are so small that they have no inheritances or , incomes beyond the exemptions allowed by law. The same thing is true of their corporation incomes. The exceptions are notable, but they are very few F. D. Morris, Gaston Cpunty Department Rural Social Economics, University of North Carolina Rank Counties Per Cap. 1 Alleghany $237 2 Durham 215 3 Guilford 202 4 Buncombe........ 195 5 Warren 191 6 Currituck 189 j 7 Onslow ? 188 I 8 Carteret 187 i 9 Person 186 10 New Hanover 182 11 Brunswick 178 12 Craven 176 13^ Duplin 174 14 Martin 173 16 Orange 168 15 Chowan^ 168 17 Bladen 167 18 Columbus 166 18 Hertford 166 18 Polk 166 21 Wake 164 22 Forsyth 158 23 Rowan 157 24 Avery 156 25 Cumberland 160 25 Perquimans 150 27 Surry 149 28 Johnston 148 29 Vance 146 30 Wayne 145 81 Jones 144 31 Alamance 144 33 Bertie 143 33 Greene 143 33 Gates 143 36 Tyrrell 141 37 Granville 138 37 Madison 188 39 Clay 137 40 Pasquotank 136 41 Stokes 135 41 Beaufort '... 135 43 Wilson 134 44 Pitt 132 45 Moore 129 45 Rockingham 129 47 Watauga 128 48 Sampson 124 Rank 49 49 49 52 52 54 54 56 56 58 59 59 59 62 62 64 65 65 67 68 68 70 70 72 73 74 75 75 75 78 78 Counties Per Cap. $122 Rutherford Pender ^^22 Halifax...- 222 Hoke ;;; Lenoir 218 Yadkin 217 Davidson 217 Burke 215 Davie Iredell 214 Jackson 212 Nash ; 212 Harnett 212 no Caswell • Chatham 210 Henderson 209 Richmond *. 108 Scotland 2O8 Washington 207 Dare igg Northampton 106 Catawba 204 Randolph 204 Alexander ; 2.02 Robeson 200 Swain gg Dee gg McDowell 96 Union 90 Wilkes 94 Anson 94 Cleveland 93 Caldwell 92 Franklin 92 Mecklenburg §9 Mitchell 89 Transylvania 89 Cabarrus 87 Lincoln 87 Macon 87 Hyde 35 Edgecombe 83 Gaston 81 Stanly 73 Montgomery 77 Haywood 77 Yancey 71 Cherokee 53 Note: Camden and Pamlico are omitted because of lack of data. Practi cally no negroes in Ashe and Graham.

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view