The news in this publi cation is released for the press on receipt. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA NEWS LETTER Published Weekly by the University of North Caro lina Press for the Univer sity Extension Division. DECEMBER 13, 1922 GHAPEI. HiEL, N. - VOL. IX, NO. 6 i EdUorfal Board . E. 0. Branson, 8. H. Hobbs, Jr., L. R. Wilson, B. W. KniRht, D. D. Oarroll, J. B. Bnllltt, H. W. Odnm. Entered as second-class matter November 14,1914, at the Postoffioe at Chapel Hill, N,-o„ nnder the act of Angnst 24, I9I! THE LITTLE FARMS OF CAROLINA BUNCOMBE, THE CHAMPION Buncombe county's farm display took first prize at the state fair this year. Buncombe took second place last year. The same county took first place in 1920. This is a worthy record and one deserving commendation. Why does Buncombe lead other North Carolina counties? The general impression is that Buncombe farm lands, on the whole, are not as adaptable to good farming as the more tillable areas of the Piedmont and Eastern Carolina. We think of mountains and hill slopes when we think of Buncombe. What is the secret, then? It is diversified farming, says the Asheville Citizen. Neither tobacco nor cotton is grown in Buncombe. Combined with diversified farming is the intelligent co-operation with the farm demonstrators, and the use of improved farm machinery. Dairying has also been given a big impetus in Buncombe county. In explanation of this superiority, The Citizen goes on to say: “The fact that she grows neither tobacco nor cotton emphasizes all the more her richness. Her orchards are famous beyond the confines of America. Not even Maine surpasses her as a potato grower. She has given sur prising impetus in the last few years to the dairying business and to the pure-bred cattle, hog, and sheep busi ness. Her per-acre production of other crops puts her in the front rank with the leading counties of a state that leads every agricultural state in the Union in per-acre crop production. “But all of this is not entirely ex plained by her fertility of soil. Some of it is due to the Buncombe farmer’s enterprising agricultural methods. He is using labor-saving machinery more' than he ever did. He is employing the latest scientific information available for fariaing. He learns from farm demonstrators. Also he is inspired by the co-operative spirit and methods in troduced by the Farmers’ Federation. In brief, Buncombe county is showing the state how to reap big profits and the great blessings that come from in telligent diversified farming. ’ ’—Gas tonia Gazette. TAXES IN NEW JERSEY Some people in North Carolina who think they are being heavily taxed, giv ing no thoughts to the benefits derived from that taxation, ought to move a- bout a bit and make observations. Cer tainly they would find comfort in the tax figures from New Jersey, where the aggregate of taxes levied for the year 1922 amount to the comfortable sum of ?169,944,939. Making analysis of the New Jersey situation, Mr. McCready Sykes, writ- in Commerce and Finance, says that this is $J 7,000,000 more than was ever before paid for similar purposes in that state. It includes the taxes levied by local assessors, county tax boards, and state boards. Local or municipal taxes account for $95,609,276. State school taxes are $9,775,031; state road taxes in one year amount to nearly $4,- 000,000; county purposes call for more than $24,000,000. New Jersey has a population of 3,- 155,900, so that her state, county, and local taxes alone amount to the stag gering sum of $61 per capita. On the statistical average of five persons to the family these figures seem incred ible. It seems impossible that the average family should be paying over $250 per year in these local taxes alone, exclusive of all income taxes and fed eral taxes of every kind. New Jersey suffers an additional burden from the fact that a large part of her people make their living in New York and are compelled to pay income taxes there. The average rateof taxation in New Jersey, as Sykes has it, is $3,661 per $100. Compare that with the comparatively low rate in North Carolina, setting the North Carolina rate against the benefits secured, and be happy.—Charlotte Ob server. AMATEUR PLAY PRODUCTION Realizing the seriousness and abiding worth of the work now being done by The Carolina Playniakers, whose aim is to encourage the production of good plays wherever they may be found, The Bureau of Community Drama of The University Extension Division last year provided a trained director to take charge of amateur productions at any community in the state that might de sire her services. In June the Bureau published Flay Production for Amateurs, a bulletin containing simple, adequate, practical instructions and sane advice, based on the experience of The Carolina Play- makers in producing playc cicditc-bly under crowded conditions and with in adequate equipment. The book ex plains .the best methods for amateur groups with limited means to produce plays that they not only need not be | ashamed of, but also may point to with j justifiable pride as examples of a com- \ munity expression of the best that the 1 locality has in it. The trcatiuont .-fj the various subjects is direct and cen-1 cise, so that an amateur director can| go to the book for aid in an emer- j gency. | Play Production for. Amateurs con- [ tains chapters on Organization, Pro-j duction, Adapting a Platform Stage, | Lighting, Scene-Painting, and Make- Up; and a bibliography of works on these subjects and on acting, folk songs and dances, and the theatre in general. It was compiled, under the direction of Professor Koch, by several persons connected with the productions of The Playmakers. The Bureau is also offering to the people of the state the services of a capable, well trained Field Agent, who acts as director of amateur produc tions, plays and pageants, in the vari ous centers at which the people desire to present more elaborate productions ; than their own training and experience I would make possible. This fall the. University secured as Field Agent of i this Bureau Miss Elizabeth M. Taylor, | of Morganton, who was graduated from the University in 1920. Miss Taylor’s training began in the early productions of The Playmakers, in which she played leading parts for two years. Later she studied for a year at The American Academy of Dramatic Arts (the famous Sargent’s School); and last summer she attended the Dramat ic Institute for Amateur Production conducted at The Art Centre, New York, by Miss Elizabeth B. Grimball, the director of “Raleigh, the Shepherd of the Ocean,’’ and of “A Pageant of the Lower Cape Fear.” Miss Taylor’s usefulness is already apparent. She has, since the University opened, assist ed with the make-up at the pageant given at St. Mary’s School, Raleigh; given classes in folk dancing and talks about production to High School stu dents in Caroleenand Henrietta; and at Caroleen she coached a play. Now Miss Taylor is in charge of the historical pageant soon to be given by the people of Macon county in Franklin. The Bulletin and the employment of Miss Taylor by the Extension Division are indicative not only of the desire of the University to serve the state, but also of the seriousness with which the question of dramatic production, par ticularly community dramatic produc tion, must be regarded. It is danger ous to the drama and to the community if the production is bad; well done, it is a thoroughly healthy expression of an artistic impulse and the result of commendable enthusiasm.—Dougald MacMillan. DRAMATIZING CAROLINA The University of North Carolina has adopted a plan for preserving the his tory and traditions of the state which promises to be as instructive as it is popular. For many years Harvard University has had a course in play writing; this department has justified itself by turning out several play wrights who have won extended fame and fortune on Broadway and in Lon don. The Harvard course, however, aims to produce playwrights of univer sal scope, whereas the course recently established at the University of North KNOW NORTH CAROLINA A Georgia Verdict The wonderful prosperity of North Carolina is on every lip. Florida challenges the admiration of the pub lic but not in the same way that North Carolina does. The great boom in the Old North State dates from the time that the people voted a $50,000,000 bond issue for good roads. Immediately after the elec tion the Highway Department set to work to build 1,000 miles of im proved roadway during the year 1922. Last week the Department closed contracts for the construction of lOy miles of hard surface roads and 79 miles of graveled roads which nearly completes the undertaking. North Carolina has closed con tracts for building 1,600 miles of highways within the past twelve months and during the past three years she has contracted for a total ot 2,500 miles. Some time ago, Mr. James B. Duke, the wealthiest man in the state and its leading citizen, said that $26,000,000 could be expended to advantage in the mountain region alone. Spending such vast sums of money not only makes for the improvement of trans portation facilities, but makes money plentiful—so many road hands get ting good wages. North Carolina and Georgia are working with the same object in view. When the road program is completed, every county seat-in the state will be connected by a good road. It was a huge undertaking in North Carolina, but the fact that government aid matched the bond issue dollar for dollar made it easy. The enhancement values will more than pay the cost before the bonds come due. Besides, you issue bonds for one dollar and get two to spend. As a prosperity producer, it is a world beater.—Athens, Ga., Herald. Carolina has a more restricted field. North Carolina has a history particu larly rich in legend as well as in^actual achievement. The mountaineers in the western part of the state are among the most delightful and historically interesting survivals in this country. Practically every mountain has its.story and the wilds of Scotland itself are no more full of feuds and adventure and romance. The association of^Sir Wal ter Raleigh with this state and the lost colony, the Croatan Indians and the Mecklenburg Declaration, the stir ring scenes of the Revolutionary War, to say nothing of the excitement of the Civil War and of the reconstruction period that followed, certainly contain material enough to keep many play wrights busy for a considerable time. These are the traditions and the his torical incidents to which the new course in playwriting at the I:Jorth Ca rolina University is now devoting its energies. Even though the successful playwrights who have been developed at Harvard may not materialize at Chapel Hill—though there is no good reason why they should not—the work is well worth while. It is educational in the highest sense and university ex tension work of the finest kind. More and more modern universities are real izing the new conception—that it is their business to be part of the com munity in which they exist; to preserve the best traditions of the state and to familiarize its people with all good thoughts and actions. Certainly no more attractive way can be found of doing this than that which the Univer sity of North Carolina has now discov ered. The fact that the plays are not only written by the students but staged and acted by them gives the Univer sity an undergraduate activity of an especially wholesome and elevating kind.—World’s Work, Dec. 1922. A YANKEE TRIBUTE Southern men were unsurpassed a- mong the nations of the earth in cour age, spirit, hospitality, and generosity to their equals. They were apt to com mand and apt to succeed. They were able politicians. With the love and habit of truth, which becomes brave men in all common concerns, they were subtle and skilful diplomatists when diplomacy was needed to accomp lish any political end. My long conflict with their leaders has impressed me with an ever increas ing admiration of the great and high qualities of our Southern people. Their love of home; their chivalrous respect for women; their courage; their deli cate sense of honor; their constancy, which can abide by an opinion or a pur pose or an interest of their state’s, through adversity and through prosper ity, through the years and through the generations, are things by which the people of the more mercurial North may take a lesson. And there is an other thing—covetousness, corruption, the low temptation of money has not yet found any place in our Southern politics.—George Frisbie Hoar, senator from Massachusetts, 1877-1904, THE CIVIC MIND If people learn to love their country, if their vision is raised beyond the pet ty circle of their personal and family interests to appreciate the true width and splendors of national life as a thing which not only embraces all of us who are now living here and grouped in a great body seeking common ends, but reaches back into the immemorial past and forward into the^mysterious future, it elevates the conception of citizen ship, it fills the sheath of,[empty words with a keen-edged sword, it helps men to rise above mere party views and to feel their exercise of voting power to be a solemn trust. It is common to talk of ignorance as the chief peril of a democracy. It has, however, another foe not less pernicious—this is indo lence. Indifference to public affairs shows itself not merely in a neglect to study them and fit one’s seif to give a judicious vote, but in the apathy which does not care to give a vote when the time comes.—James Bryce. CULTIVATED ACRES PER FARM In North Carolina in 1920 Eased on the 1920 Census of Agriculture covering (1) all improved land in each county, (2) divided by the number of farms. Cultivated land includes all land regularly tilled or mowed, land in pasture which has been cleared or tilled, land lying fallow, land in gardens, orchards, vineyards, and nurseries, and land occupied by farm buildings. The average for the United States was 78 cultivated acres per farm; for North Carolina it was 30.4 and only Massachusetts had smaller farms. Farms in North Carolina are small partly due to the physical features of the land in our rougher areas and to the relatively dense farm population, but mainly (1) to excessive farm tenancy with the landlord interested in per acre yields' and consequently in small tenant farms, (2) to maximum attention to cotton and tobacco our two best cash crops, which require a maximum of human labor per acre, and little machinery, (3) to small total grain, hay, and forage yields, which require larger areas and more machinery, (4) to small livestock values per farm, which require broad acres in pasture, grain, and forage, and (5) to a minimum acreage in fruit and garden spaces. Our cultivated acreage per farm should be larger. Farm profits lie mainly in per worker yields. Only 26.8 percent of the land area of the state is im proved. But our farms are smaller every decade. The cultivated acreage per farm in 1910 averaged 34.7 acres; in 1920 it was 30.4 acres. In 1920 we had 16,038 more farms but 615,000 fewer acres under cultivation. Other tables in farm economics to follow as already announced. S. H. Hobbs, Jr. Department of Rural Social Economies. University of North Carolina Rank Counties Cultivated Rank Counties Cultivated Acres per Acres per Farm Farm 1 Alleghany 66.1 51 Yadkin .... 29.8 2 Currituck 61.4 62 Cumberland.... 29.7 3 Ashe 46.4 53 Vance 29.6 4 Richmond 43.2 54 Tyrrell 28.9 5 Cabarrus 42.0 65 Mitchell 28.7 6 Rowan 41.8 66 Stokes 28.7 7 Watauga 41.7 57 Lenoir 28.6 8 Scotland 41.4 68 Avery 28.0 9 Lincoln 40.6 59 Montgomery.. , ... 27.9 10 Camden 40.4 60 Bladen .... 27.8 11 Haywood 39.4 60 Wayne 27.8 12 Iredell... . 39.1 62 Yancey 27.7 13 Catawba 39.0 63 Surry 27.4 14 Davie 38.3 64 Harnett 26.9 15 Caswell 37.7 64 Henderson..... 26.9 16 Pasquotank ... 37.5 64 Jackson .. .. 26.9 17 Alamance 37.3 64 Macon 26.9 17 Gaston 37.3 68 Pamlico ... . 26.7 19 Guilford 36.3 69 Burke’ .... 26.6 20 Madison. ., .. 36.2 69 Moore ... . 26.6 21 Edgecombe.... 36.1 71 Bertie 26.1 22 Hoke 35.2 72 Rutherford.... . ... 25.8 23 Buncombe .... 35.0 72 Sampson 26.8 24 Mecklenburg .. 34.9 74 Warren ... . 26.6 26 Stanly 34.8 76 Johnston . ... 26.3 26 Jones 34.3 76 Lee ... . 26.3 27 Randolph 34.2 77 Franklin ... . 26.0 28 Davidson 34.1 78 Onslow 24.9 29 Person 33.6 79 Wake 24.8 30 B’orsyth 33.1 . 80 Beaufort 24.6 30 Perquimans ... 33.1 80 Greene 24.6 32 Chowan 33.0 80 Pitt 24.6 32 Cleveland 33.0 83 Nash 24.3 84 Halifax 32.6 83 Transylvania .. 24.3 36 Union 32.6 85 Durham 24.0 36 Hyde 32.3 86 Graham ... . 23.4 37 Granville 32.1 87 Pender 23.3 38 Alexander .... 31.9 88 Polk 23.1 38 Washington... 31.9 89 Craven 23.0 38 Robeson 31.9 89 McDowell... 23.0 41 Hertford 31.8 91 Wilson ........ 22.2 42 Martin 31.6 92 Swain 22.1 43 Ornrig-p 31.4 92 WilkpR .... 22.1 44 Caldwell 31.1 94 Columbus 22.0 45 Gates 31.0 j96 Cherokee 21.9 46 Clay 30.8 ,96 Duplin 21.0 47 Rockingham.. 30.6 ; 97 Carteret 20.2 48 Anson 30.3 97 Brunswick .... 20.2 48 Chatham 30.3 99 New Hanover. 19.0 60 Northampton. 29.9 100 Dare 14.6

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view