The news in this publi
cation is released for the
press on receipt.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
NEWS LETTER
Published Weekly by the
University of North Caro
lina for the University Ex
tension Division.
JUNE 3 , 1925
CHAPEL HILL, N C.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PRESS
VOL. XI, NO. 29
Kd.loriai Bo.., J, E. C. Eran.on. S. H. Hobbs. Jr., L. R. Wilson. E. W. Knight. D. D. Carroll. J. B. Bullitt. H. W. Odum. Entered «B secend-clasa matter November 14. 1914, at the Postofflec at Chapel Hill, N. C., under the act of August 24, 1912
MANUFACTURE IN CAROLINA value of output per wage earner it is
^ .. ,, , f i. ,. r! probable that the tobacco industry
Not counting the value of output of'u„j, ,, . • , a. • i.
. , . A ui- u i. u I major industries. The fac-
manufactunng establishments whose „ , . . ^ a a i_
, . f. . , A. cl value of manufactured tobacco
products amounted to less than five icn j-
% .an d-u r d. 1 „ averaged $21,150 per wage earner for
thousand dollars, the factory value of • ^923. The average output per textile
products manufactured m North Caro-
Jina m 1923 was nearly 962 million dol- ^anuf^eture of tobacco, especially of
cigarettes and smoking tobacco.
lars. If the products of our hundreds
of small establishments with an annual
output of less than $5,000 were added,
it is likely that the value of North Ca
rolina’s manufacturing establishments
would total more than one billion dol
lars. The value of factory products
for 1928 was 43.1 percent greater than
the value for 1921, which was slightly
above 665 million dollars. It was even
greater than the value for the peak
year of 1919. Which means that in
volume of products North Carolina has
made rapid recovery and progress since
the slump of 1920, and following. Both
" from the point of volume as well as
value, 1923 was our banner industrial
year.
The table which appears elsewhere
gives the main facts about our major
industries, as reported by the Federal
Department of Commerce, for the
year 1923.
Wage Earners
The average number of wage earn
ers employed during 1923, 173,687, ex
ceeded by 27.9 percent the number re
ported . for 1921, 135,833. The total
wages paid in 1923 amounted to $127,-
644,000 against $94,235,000 for 1921, or
an increase of 35.3 percent. The aver
age wage earner for the year 1923 re
ceived $735.
Leading Industries
The textile industry continues to
rank first among the industries of
North Carolina. The total factory
value of all textile products for 1023
was more than 363 million dollars,
which was more than the value of all
crops produced by the state in 1924!
Only about ten percent of the value of
our textile products was contributed by
knitting mills. The textile industry
employs nearly 54 percent of all indus
trial wage earners employed in the
state, and contributes more than 38
percent of the total value of all fac
tory products. A most remarkable
recovery was made in the textile indus
try over the depression of 1921, the
value of products increasing from a
little more than 214 million dollars to
more than 363 million dollars. North
Carolina spindles are now, and for
some time have been, averaging more
hours per month than the spindles of
any other state. The textile industry
is firmly established in North Carolina
and probably will continue to rank as
our leading industry for some years to
come.
Tobacco
However, there is another giant
looming on the horizon, and making a
strong bid for first place among the
industries of the State. That industry
is tobacco about which a great many
things might be said. The tobacco in
dustry has had a remarkable growth
in North Carolina during recent years,
and, unlike most other industries, it
hardly felt the general depression fol
lowing the war. In fact tobacco seems
to thrive on wars and following wars,
it was the Civil War that gave birth to
our tobacco industry, and it was the
recent World War that did so much to
popularize the use of tobacco. The use
of tobacco does not seem to be affected
by peribds of depression as the value of
output steadily increased during the
years of depression following the re
cent war. Perhaps its soothing and,
stimulating qualities enable one more
readily to endure such a crisis!
Tobacco is largely responsible for
North Carolina’s high rank in the pay
ment of Federal taxes. Of our total
Federal tax of nearly 158 million dollars
paid during the fiscal year ending June
30, 1924, nearly 137 million dollars was
contributed by tobacco. North Caro
lina pays 42 percent of the Nation's to
bacco tax, and manufactures probably
more than two-fifths of all tobacco
manufactured in the United States.
An interesting feature of the tobac
co industry is the enormous value of
output in proportion to the number
of wage earners empI^.yed. In the
machine-made industry, which accounts
for the small number of wage earners.
Lumber and Furniture
Lumber and timber products and
planing mill products in 1923 were re
ported at more than 54 million dollars.
There are hundreds of small saw mills
which operate irregularly and whose
individual output is not large. If the
total output of these mills were^added,
the value of timber products would be
materially increased.
The furniture industry, including
show cases, ranks fourth among the
industries of the state with a factory
value of output amounting to a little
more than 40 million dollars. There
are 113 furniture manufacturing estab
lishments in the state, employing an
aggregate average of 10,624 wage
earners. The furniture industry, un
like tobacco, requires a great amount
of human labor in proportion to value
of products.
North Carolina has four other major
industries of almost equal rank in val
ue of products: (1) Oil, cake, and meal,
cottonseed with products valued at
$17,980,296; (2) fertilizers valued at
$17,431,084; (3) car and general con
struction and repair, and ste^m rail
road shops with products valued at
$15,265,811; and (4) leather, tanned,
curried and finished valued at $14,-
368,670. Facts for other minor indus
tries are carried in the accompanying
table.
Miscellaneous industries cover an al
most unlimited assortment of indus
trial activities such as bottling works,
quarries, paper, monuments, flour and
grist mills and the like. The miscel
laneous industries listed in the 1923-24
report of the State Commissioner of
Labor and Printing number 1,735.
The miscellaneous industries, those not
classified in the accompanying table,
employ 19,276 wage earners upon an
average, and the total value of output
in 1923 amounted to more than 120 mil
lion dollars, or about as much as the
entire cotton crop of the state brought
last year.
Among these miscellaneous indus
tries are the world’s largest pulp mill
and the world’s largest aluminum plant,
facts for which are not reported! in
order to avoid disclosing the operations
of individual establishments.
Industry vs. Agriculture
Ir the production of wealth North
Carolina is now, and for some time has
been, an industrial state. In people
engaged in gainful occupations, and in
investment in productive enterprises,
North Carolina is still an agricultural
state. The value of farm property in
the state exceeds the investment in
industries by a wide margin. Nearly
60 percent of all people in the
state live on farms. The agricultural
workers of the state number close to a
half million, while the industrial work
ers number less than 174,000. Yet
' the 174 thousand industrial workers
turn out nearly a billion dollars’ worth
of products, with less capital employed
by owners of industries, while the half
million farm workers turn out farm
products the value of which in 1924
was 429 million dollars. The net or
new wealth created annually by indus
tries in North Carolina is far greater
than the new wealth created by agri
culture.
These basic facts explain a great
many things, among them being the
rapid urbanization of the state, the re
markable growth in trade, banking and
transportation facilities and other evi
dences of the more rapid accumulation
of wealth resulting from our in
dustrial expansion. The ability of in
dustry to produce such large wealth
totals, in comparison with agricul
ture, is the cause of our remarkable
industrial growth, and industry is
largely responsible for the great prog
ress the state has made within recent
years.
HOMEMADE ELECIRICITY
Sometime all the farms of this
country will be electrified. Every
one connected with the electrical in
dustry believes that and is working
toward its accomplishment. The big
central-station companies are tak
ing the initiative, realizing that they
should render the same service to
agriculture that they render to other
industries.
In the meantime thousands of
farmers are so situated they do not
have to wait for the big power com
panies’wires. Those with unfailing
streams of water can often erect
their own power plants.
Some streams are capable of gen
erating a considerable amount of
power; others seem so small as to be
negligible, yet properly harnessed
they would easily light all the farm
buildings.
How to determine the capacities
of a stream, how to build a dam and
utilize the water and what kind of
plant to install are all set forth in a
new bulletin issued by the United
States Department of Agriculture,
entitled Power for the Farm from
Small Streams. A copy of this book
let, known also as Farmers’ Bulletin
No. 1430, can be obtained for five
cents from the Superintendent of
Public Documents, Washington, D.C.
This bulletin gives about all the
information a farmer wants concern
ing the possibilitiesof hisstream, ex
cept the price of equipment for a
plant.—The Country Gentleman,
May 16, 1926.
All of which is good,.the state consid
ered, and good for agriculture, since
the greatest need in a commercial agri
culture is for markets, preferably local
markets, which we are bound to have
in increasing abundance as the state
approaches a better balance of popula
tion, activities, and enterprises result
ing from her wholesome industrial ex
pansion.—S. H. H., Jr.
TAX PROBLEMS DISCUSSED
The North Carolina Club held its last
meeting of the school year on Monday
night, May 11. A paper on Ta^ Prob
lems in North Carolina was read by
C. G. Grady. The tax situation as it
now stands in North Carolina was
clearly presented by the reader. Sev
eral vital tax problems were pointed
out and discussed, and improvements
were suggested.
Mr. Grady began by saying that the
problem of taxation in this state is not
a new one, that it has been under con
sideration for many years, and that
many people of our state will continue
to suffer from unjust tax burdens until
ail classes realize that they must give
in on certain points and be willing to
carry their proper share of the cost of
government. Unless such an agree
ment can be reached and a more coop
erative spirit can be established among
the people of this state it is very prob
able that our present tax system will
remain and gross injustices will con
tinue to be borne, not only by certain
classes of our people, but by large
numbers within the various classes,
due to unequal assessments.
The reader pointed out that taxation
is largely a result of the industrial peri
od, that in the early years of man’s
struggle for domination, collective re
sponsibilities were in an embryonic
state and therefore created no fiscal
problems. But as time has passed and
new institutions have taken root and
been fostered by political stability and
economic advancement taxation has
been introduced. Also the multiplica
tion and elaboration of forms and de
vices of taxation in the modern, indus
trial state have brought with them
new and complicated problems.
Taxes Unevenly Distributed
The fact that our present system of
taxation is coming to be burdensome to
some is no reason to 'be pessimistic.
The conservative policy of our state
government at present is probably due Mr. Grady’s paper on tax problems
more to the fact that the cost of | will be printed in full in the North Ca-
state government rests on relatively
a few shoulders than to the per
inhabitant or the aggregate cost, since
government in North Carolina is still
relatively cheap.
In many counties and municipalities
of the state the taxes on both land
and personal property are too high.
The chief cause of this is lack of uni
formity in the valuation of labd for
taxation.
Our state income tax was discussed
in detail because of the fact that the
greatest single source of revenue'for
state purposes is the income tax. A
brief history of our income tax law
from 1849 to the present was given.
An amendment to the law of 1923 was
passed during the last meeting of the
State Legislature in which the rate of
tax on incomes was increased from a
(maximum'of three percent to a maxi-
• mum of five percent.
I A still greater increase in rate was
made in our inheritance tax law, particu
larly in the rates on large inheritances
by individuals belonging to the second
and third classes.
The question of the taxation of
stocks in North Carolina was also dis
cussed. The taxation of stock in for
eign corporations was discussed from
both sides. The speaker endeavored
to point out the arguments, pro and
con, rather than to make definite pro
posals.
Property Taxes
Mr. Grady stated th^t the majority
of complaints against taxes were due
to county and local rates on property
rather than to state taxes. Unequal
assessments within and among the
counties, and widely varying rates be
tween counties and smaller divisions
were given as the chief causes of dis
satisfaction.
Many results of the Revaluation Act
of 1919 were given in which it was
shown that the real object of this act
was not to increase the burden of
taxes but to reach those who were fail-
ing to list tlpeir property as they
should, and who were thus failing to
contribute their fair share towards
defraying the cost of government.
A few of the tax laws which were
passed in the Legislature of 1926 were
mentioned, among them being the tax
on gasoline service stations, busses,
construction companies, and barber
shops.
Great emphasis vras placed upon the
problem of collecting taxes. It was
shown that allowing the taxpayer
to delay the payment of bis taxes was
almost invariably a bad practice.
In closing the reader gave five ques
tions to be asked concerning an ade
quate tax system. The first was: Is
the tax general or exclusive? Second;
Is there complete freedom of move
ment of capital? Third: Does the law
of monoply or the law of competition
prevail? Fourth: Can the tax be capi
talized? And fifth: Is the article pro
duced at a constant, increasing, or
diminishing cost?
rolina Club Year Book, which goes to
the press in a few weeks.
LEADERSHIP REQUIREMENTS
1. Did you ever deliberately decide
to break yourself of a habit and suc
ceed in doing it?
2. Do you control your temper and
not “fly off the handle” when things
go wrong?
3. Are you usually cheerful and free
from grouchy spells?
4. Do you think for yourself and not
let the opinions of others influence
you unduly?
6. Do you keep your head in an emer
gency?
Do you remain calm when your
own mistakes are pointed out lo you?
7. Do your men respect you and co
operate with you?
Can you maintain discipline with
out resorting to the use of authority?
9. Have you ever been selected to
take charge of a group of dissatisfied
men because of your ability to handle
men?
10. Can you adjust difficulties and
retain the friendship of the persons
who have differed?
11. Can you get men under you to do
things without irritating them and
causing them to be resentful of your
authority?
12. Are you patient when dealing
with people hard to please?
13. Can you meet opposition without
becoming confused and saying things
you wish afterwards you had not said?
14. Are you sought out by your
friends to handle delicate situations be
cause of your ability to do such things?
16. Do you make and retain friends
easily?
16. Do you make it a rule not to
quarrel about petty things?
17. When thrown with a group of
strangers, do you adjust yourself
easily?
18. When talking to superiors, do
you feel free from embarrassment?
19. Wben interviewing subordinates,
do you put them at ease?
20. Are you able to express your own
ideas without causing others to feel
that you are overbearing and narrow
minded?—Trained Men.
BANKS SHOW GROWTH
In 1914 the bank deposits of North
Carolina totaled $96,599,000 and in
1924 deposits amounted to $327,144,000.
The'ten-year gain in bank deposits was
$230,646,000 or 244 percent.
The total resources of North Carolina
banks in 1914 were $166,498,000, while
in 1924 they were listed at $459,417,000.
The ten-year increase in bank resour
ces was $302,919,000, or again of 194
percent.
Our banks have shown a . rapid re
covery since the slump of 1921, They
have climbed beyond the peak reached
during the World War, and today, in
every particular North Carolina’s banks
present larger resources than ever
before in her history.
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES IN NORTH CAROLINA
A Summary of Industrial Facts for 1923
The following table, based on data recently released by the Federal De
partment of Commerce, ranks the important industries of North Carolina ac
cording to the value of products for 1923. The table also shows the number of
establishments, average number of wage earners, and wages paid.
Industries
No. of
Establish
ments
Wage
Earners
Av. No.
Wages
Value of
Products
Chewing and smoking, and snuff
Lumber and timber products, and plan-
Car and general construction and repairs,
steam-railroad repair shops
Leather, tanned, curried, and finished...
Boxes, wooden packing, except cigar
boxes
Foundry and machine shop products....
Clay products, other than pottery and
nonclay refractories
361
81,041
$54,842,992
5326,672,014
109
12,361
6,963,743
36,759,413
17
11,531
9,473,901
264,218,190
9
2,428
1,339,000
31,667,820
712
22,945
16,828,013
54,242,989
113
10,624
8,698,320
40,072,677
62
1,226
767,123
17,980,296
64
1,721
1,260,473
17,431,084
16
6,104
6,606,846
16,265.811
10
1,223
907,293
14,368,670
26
1,162
794,201
4,569,480
61
1,164
1,321,112
4,488,627
67
1,892
1,323,334
3,980,708
1,064
19,276
17,648,470
120,402,920
Grand total for the year 1923 2,670
Total for the year 1921 2,602
173,687 127,643,821
136,833 94,234,837
961,910,599
666,117,738