Newspapers / The Shore Line (Pine … / Jan. 1, 1985, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of The Shore Line (Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
* • • A Page -2- Ano^r stipulation requested by Schliaper and recomaended by the boaid would the developers to widen Pine Knoll Boulevard from Salter I&th Hoad to Roosevelt Boulevard to provide a left turn lane into the shopping center, . a supermarket, a department store similar to Roses and other retail shops. They also call for a four-story building -- w^h would have rental office space on the third floor and a restaurant Sx the toT floor ovedook^ the ocean and the sound. The plans would largely preserve dunes on ^ developers have said that only a reduction in the number of parking spaces would make this possible, ^auction xn tne number of spokesman for the developers told the Planning Board that while several of the lessors had been signed up, he was not prepared to announce them h«w officials have made no secret that if the center is approved, they will build and occupy their own building, * ^ tlon,”“4r^? ^ ^ W*™lng Board recounenda- tlons. We are pleased that it recommended approval (of the site ulan^ *• raIh tjv. .. ^chino, site designer, will have to taS a litill m^LlMi'ot^r'cJSions wa« division of sentiment within the town on the issue ^ J|“derBMred by fo^tion of a group which calls itself "Concerned Residents of ?+ literature sharply attacking the shopping center ^ residents to say whether they favored the Benson and Britt or a much smaller center having “onlv sufficient retail facilites to meet "Uie needs of PKS residents," the doesn’t rait this plaza, there are stlU nays of stopping It,” contended the proposed shopping center ^yioiates the 76 and 81 official land use plans.*• it also said town attorney Ken Commissioners beforehand that its action November "I ^ ^ »ulti-family to shopping center V Zoning* and is illeg*il.“ The group also^serted that q developer to preserve in its natural state in perpetuity assertions brought sharp denials. When asked for comment, Kirkman ^ rezoning of the 10 acres was Illegal is "absolutely false," "I don't think it is illegal," he said, W Falkenberg took issue with the Concerned Residents of the PKS land Use Plan written by Art Browne, who took a major V proposed shopping center "in no way violates the plan for the Town s development as embodied in its Land Use Plan and land use V- »eeting, Schlimper challenged the Concerned Residents to show legal for the claim that a covenant would not protect the back 10 acres from develop- ^ (read) sajs it (a conservation covenant) would be in perpetuity,' Schlimper said. He then asserted that "any poll that results from this inaccSaS document would not be worth the paper it is printed on,"
The Shore Line (Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Jan. 1, 1985, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75