PAGE EIGHT JCSchool Arguments End ~ FILL UP ’ With FUEL OIL NOW! A full lank will prevent condensation and . av e you an expert- it • repair bill. KEEP A FI id, I A NIC LYNN'S S"»S 336 S. Salisbury St , PHONE 2 4435 TT—l iir-i-iiMimi 1,,, _ A ~ t| mmt , ,1, , , ♦ A WORLD OF VALUES IN k MuawKwfeM tW<* shopped and Shopped Months and Moot lei Ai; n t.. It* I lie You A Dazzling Array of Unbeatable furniture (.lit Buys Now’ ♦ ; A- '** ' I | * i .•• , SWU |F ..... i i (A. ▲ i t. • iigS :e - ▼ D.. v A J :m < i . , - i . V U A A &ri b ■ W '•a’ 5 I I ri iiA'. i y:f. ▼ A [A, J..1 f| 7 * ,. '’E-' * - Fmgk; ▲ Hi |MIRjUfcL 'll Wt' | tjPl ♦ SAVE 20 | ON US 3 PIECE ♦ BEDROOM GROUP Up ♦ 4 Christmas l iF§gs);®-;i J ♦ SPECIAL ’ ■’* ’ * WR?/* I.a rye AI iiTored V .uittv. Spacious Plies! <>! Drawers, P®* ji. «trut 1 ~ily c i '<»• ! Double Led i wished in i><‘:> tit 1 1 ul tpete| A nieriean \\ mil A suife that will add rh.u ill to t]) m W m J #... J f tuiii bedroom tor many, many year,, A Open Fri. Evening Dec. 19 and Tue. 23 ♦ Til 9 For Your Shopping Convenience IP y > »|lj £ DISTINCTIVE GIFT \ Only,., . liiauiif'.'l -Hand- 1 A ft jA rubbed mahogany A I ”.) I , i! Bth CENTURY | MAHOGANY CHEST I Magnificent pe- tfl riod c-. dar r!:<‘: i QQ 1 in nwiiof.ans ve, neers fully cedar- # lit VI.H I, V. DUNMOAN WASHINGTON lANP) T*. n heurs of argument before the U. S Supreme Court last week cm it." constduhonaJ'ty ot segregated schools in four .suite . and the Dir t:.M of (Joii.in.bia, attracted thon -ancls of ~pectaton* n#a all .*ec ,*?ns of the country. Robert 1.. Carter of Now Y< T< R^MAiiNE MADE IK CAUfORNIA IHi 10R EWOtHim y&y /( J THROUGHOUT THE WURIQ j 1 « ' SHfil l IT* R °MA wI m e CO. ** r «*eocj, cali*. 5 -pc. FOLDING METAL BRIDGE SET ■ A useful and t•.. j»>s : t>!<> «ifi lui | games. • nack- and fun Padded d* jj plastic f.ii and di-foffiled t:,bl< *r J/* * . lop; rounded metal frames “Serving The South Since 1875" i I, FURNITURE Wilmington Street At Martin qp #> & <#> ft u .islant general counsel tor the, National , ■.-sociauun fur the Ad v.111ol•:t>• • .-t i oi Colon el People, be an the aipuments Tuesday with the contention that segregated c.Hx.i,. m Kansas deny Negroes equal educational opportunities. Cm ter pointed out that .segre gation forces "an inferior caste, lowers the level of aspiration for Negro children aiat instills a fed tng of inferiority.” Admttt'ng ti• ■ t the -e is no dis THE CAROLINIAN HIW.'AHI MTU'WIIMH“ imminiimiMt- W»*«VIMM'!»fV«»HI«» , » !< i > iiw iii the physical iucihlicSj and teacher qualifications between I Negro and white schools in To pcKU, Carter slated that all claim j of constitutional inequality was abandoned “except what come: from segregation itself " A Supreme court decision of 1869 declared that no state ‘can use race alone" as a reason for i .-a gregation argued Cat ter. Kansas; admits that it dot's, therefore the ; state law is defective arid should | be struck down." Paul E. Wilson, assistant attor ney general for Kansas, rejoined | that the states segregation system! is constitutional as long as equal; facilities a’o provided. Justice Felix Frankfurter asked j 1 what the “consequences" wnukNbe it segregation was abolished in ! tlit' a c.' hoots of Kansas. Pointing out that the- Negro j t opulation is relative!} small !»: Kansas. Wilson replied Ha! ••• Hi ' tonbcquemes probably would not] te ■ eiious." Wilson told the court End should I U u ve-r-e the deci ion of a lowei ] limit upholding the segt egutiou I ’ .luh it would 10 saying in es i Id ct that Congress and the Appeah ’ vo.irts have been vv rong fur tht*' cast 75 years. To this Justice Harold K. Burton 1 : i plied that social and economic relattpns have changed enough in ' that time to throw a different I light on the problem During the cross ••xannnation Justice Stanley F. Reed asked; t arter it racial segregation dealt 1 with the emotional arid mental; development of the child 01 retard ini his ability h learn Testimony tn the lower court; showed evidence that the emotion- j lal impact upon children in segre- j ; gated schools prevented them from | !< amine as well as they would in j mixed schools answered Carter. The educational content is tow .er iban it would otherwise ha-. >• ‘te i. because the-e children art tarred tron, learninii how to hue :a:d work in a mixed group, added j Carter. Justice* lilt! ton then a: keel it b .' It;-* attonnw's cold* ljln.it Ui3. 'There is a ; l ea* deal more 1* * tte ed'icationai pvocers that, you reail j ... a bi-.uk 1 Carit r ans.'.eird that equa! educational opportuiiity doe.-', not i stop with ciiial physical taciii .; t ics He then pointed out that the -I • ai.de but equaV I'-r! hen I :••■! hi applied to these educational! ... i-s because the issue is entin •l\ new, it is one which has. m vei oeen passed on previously : v \1 MtSlS\!.I ATI Al ‘KS . i CIO CATION TN SOUTH CAROLINA Afte! two hour debate on tin Nan. a- case, I'iiu.'caiod Mai shall i'll lei counsel for NAAOP. lie.nch eii an attack on fi.e South (,'ari.i mandatory xckivjtatton sv • t**» *■•’'*«!m ...at: hall pointed out tliat 't w:e ; a pup.dai mi under-tandine; that ; ■ t tic set too I segregation cases hiriiu on clanns oi ineq..liity ot 'chout iii-. ilittes. The a i :’un i-tilr reallv claim that j tui n't iiuii!d reverse tin c-j .i:,. te but i qual pronouncement 1 i ddown in lriiKi and strike down ; ■ i gieeation hi-cai'S’c d nanc.- chii* dien. denies fundamental lights uriei is u form of discrimination Thai violates the (-‘..'nsttlLitioiu: - i.-uarantec of equal proteetiiai un de: the law, he said. Taking an opposite viewpoint; was Attorney John W Davis, 7ii veal old famed constitutional law yer and 1924 candidate for Pri-si 'eient cf the United Stab s •Davis claimed that the mixing nt students wot*ld result tn a situ ation "that one cannot contem plate with entire equanimity ' He a-ked t-he court to decide in favor ot equal educational opportunities te- Negro and white students, lit rot to make sec. rogation unlaw ful Ending his argument in a great !;dc of emotion Wednesday, Da -is told the cuntt that t.Ds ques ion rrf educating the young war •one which most n-ariy apiiroache.'. the hearts and minds of the pec.- ph He appealed to the court: ••i 11 -st of wisdom" jo h ave tins i durational procedure to those n ,:t immediately alfected and to abide by the wishes of the parents ; close forcing children into con tacts where they might be UirwoJ* SCHOOL FACILITIES SERIOUS LY UNEQUAL SAYS ROBINSON An attack on the school segrega-; tien law in the state of Virginia was made by Spoltswood Robinson.; HI of Richmond, and defended by Ij. Justine Moore of Richmond and; | judge .1. Lindsay Almond, attorney j i nera! of Virginia. Pointing out that the school fa : cilitics for whites and Negroes are ' ! seriously unequal. Robinson asdeu 1 the court to issue a eleareut ru! I ing that segregation in publk j ! schools is in itself unconstitutional i and should be abandoned immedi-1 lately. : , i Moore argued that the Vuginia , Haw dues not conflict with the fed-, Aral constitution’s guarantee lor; | eriua! protection under Uie law j (He claimed that equal facilities! : -hould be urovided. but pointed i nut teat Mgl t,-c.atiOli “la a pai t a ■ Ke.tr way ot life.” Judge Almond gave the history; iof ej'.rcgation in the school system I i,; Virginia dating back to 1965 •A lien missionaries, from New Ene- Sand established separate school?.j I for the races. He told of what he called pyo- I gross which education has made m ; tiu» state of Virginia, but he said I i integration would "stou this march j j cJ r progress and this unvvard . ' - weep ” The segregated school tty?tern in ! ■Hie District of Columbia was next | ! condemned by George E. C Hayes j I arid James M. Nabrlt with Milton j ID. Korman. assistant corporation J | counsel upholding the policy. i I Hayes claimed that segregated i j schools in tiie District of Colum-! i hifi is a violation of the civil, j rights statute and a violation of I | public policy. He pointed out that j the statute and a violation of pub- j ! lie policy He pointed out that trie! i statue of the District cf Columbia | ! nowhere requires segregation | He reminded the court that this] | was its first opportunity to pass, '«u the D. C. Statute, {ROYAL §:d f BAKING ! ; TREATS.*SIfS 3 1 ROYAL SUPERIOR * 1 FRUIT CAKES i % «b-‘ I rile Usual Royal Quality Filled With H g Delicious, Selected Fruits And Nuts £ P "w# win, Jplp/ : J -M W A ra.„.,„s NZi- i I -It 1 DELICIOUS LAYER $ | , M CAKES | i V Again the Christinas season is at hand Am! ,<►£ L Make your selection early for you will study want * ste * .*» oil#* t»f ihpst 4 c«itke*s for (. lvri&tfi*&&# C’h-d-'colate, Caramel, Orange, I .enimt, jj£ & S j|l Itcii yo Pinfapjilr, (, ui uaniitj 3iu i l»lsu It , . i 50c ;® i i SI.OO $1.50 >*e” ? #s* **.■ ¥ ■'« f» ’' > >■ . /( . Sjgs 4C-- , , 4 | , ‘.jj. & v lioiiH- Made Japanese .«: | FRUIT CAKE 5 Made w f Jh grated cocoamt!, £? nuts, raisins, lemons and i I■ » • & spices. & | I $3.00 each ? % Pies For Christmas 2 '¥ CHOCOLATE AND LEMON MERINGUE PIES (ffPafcjpt § H ALSO LEMON, MINCE, PUMPKIN, PEACH, § ft. POTATO AND APPLE PIES. * * sSs tt ¥ 2 7-WAY HOME MADE p J | LAYER CAKES | *£ # , i: Pineapple, Fresh (.'ocanut & %r v (’ horol at e. Orange, Lemon 1 I $1.65 5 £? sa&. i« «= : r% , 4bP 5 - AjgL f S MtirA 01.1 Fashi *.l Certnan Christmas Cookie. ' » Springerle, Bavarian Lebkuchen, and I Pfef fernuesse. 3 V*' Also A Gidod Selection ol Tree and $ | Santa Cookie. | i ROYAL BAKING CO. I ii 109 S. Wilmington St. Phone U 333 Raleigh, IS. CS £ WEEK ENDING SATURDAY DECEMBER 20, 1952. ? OLD FASHION J k JpOUND for POUND J 5 J CAKE I | t 75c per pound | § -.eNas*.. '. v