Newspapers / North Carolina Whig (Charlotte, … / April 20, 1833, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of North Carolina Whig (Charlotte, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
THE MINERS' AND FARMERS' JOtltNAI. liamn reniove ihe p»T.ular i gr»«.| «,hI .he loo, the «u(ho,ity of; wilh C, L“.„ .Lh .h.. co„«l.u..o» r.,.s. ...d : ,he e„„r., of .h= I'. S.a.e,, b.cau.;_,ho 'J; «i»t, at pleasure or discretion, the t'liiut- iiioiits uiiil the ilrrisions of aiu li u CJovitii- inont. 1 maintain, tlicrcforo, sir, that, from THE PEOPL* or TIIE UOTTSD StATEF, DO ORDAI.N AM> KSTABLIsn THIS CONSTITr*- rioN.” These words must cease to be a part of the constitution—they must be oblit erated from the parchment on which they are written, before any human ingenuity or ;ument can remove the popular „ . „ lich that constitution rests, and jthe courts of the I . Slates, because turn the instrument into a mere compact j expressly prohibits all apjieal to those between sovereign State*. courts. It is in order to sustain this as- 'Phe second proposition, sir, which 1 .scried right ol being her own jud^ that propose to maintain, is, that no State au- she pronounces the constitution ot the I . ■\ *. .. » .1 i.- krt kit* thority between and mdi' these therefore sfCfMion , _ lows, as it seems to me, as a just consequencc,^; be conclusive, if it be first proved that the constitution ol the r. Stales is a Government proper, ow ing protection to individuals, and entitled to their obedience. The people, sir, in every State, live un der two Governments. They owe obedi ence to both.—These Governments, though distinct, are not adverse. Each has its separate sphere, and its peculiar powers laws of the U. Slates unconstitutional; and !: the whole, the inevitablo ‘j ,r'’.on;ctVtion, asserted the same thing to vision she does not allow any authori-: that ‘J® thU Legislature of Maryland, and urged it 10 r. States to overrule or reverse.; the dcci«ons of this judiruJ po' er, , « ^ reiectiiiff the constitution. »_»i course she rejccti the authority of Con-; l)c biiidin" on nnd over the , i.; J.„if „i„„ „ iticm- cress, because the very objoct of the ordi-: man can form the conception of a l.ovcrn- iiance is to reverse the decisions of Con- nieiit existing over lour uud twctil} ^ lutes, Mr. Martin, who had been a member of Congress, it is of necenity that should be ultimately decided bj (’oDt,,-^ itself. Like other l^egislaturrn, it be trusted with this |»ower. 'I’he in*>n;bci of Congress arc chosen by the peop|, ,jj they are answerable to the people other public agents, they are IxHjnd k) i to 8iip|>ort the constitution. These are if! securities that they will not violate ihej, id their powers. tV- nient. I have already endeavored, sir, to ,K,i«t I’res.dent, the const.futinn ha U lore ( fIhu, t is out the practical consequences of this doc- not 1. It this r.nl.i.ul ,K>ml without lull uikI : ih.s. ss a n, rinadi, ilible • trine, and to show how utierlv incousistont cxplict provisions. I ir^t, ns to the au- was tlmucht im xi^dicnt nnd_ mmlinissibie, Mr. I’inrliiiry, himself also a leading mem ber of the convention, declared it to the people of South ('arolina. Kvery where, it was admitted, by friends and foes, that this i)ower was in the constitution. K.v , some it was ihought dangerous, by most it j duty, nor transcen was thought necessary ; hut, by all, it was are the same securities as prevail looit;, i.rreed to be a t)o«er artually contained ini p«»pular (.overnments ; nor is it easy log,. The Convention saw the 1 how grants of power can be more^f, ({iiardi'd, without rendering them If the case cannot come before the n i!!', and if Congress be not trusted with lUi^ cision, who shall decide it? I'he man says, each State is to decide it for h#- self. If so, then, as I have already what is law in one Slate is not U* another. Or, if the resistance of oneSij; coni|iels an entire repeal of the law, ih*n, minority, and that a small one, (’uveniiiiJ whole country. I Ta h* Toii/iiiurii.] It is,\vith all ideas of regular government, tliorily of Ccii^rcss.—Having enumerated jami in ils | and how soon its adoption would involve the the spcific powers conferred on C'ongresv, j tule lor it. whole country in revolution and absolute the cmistilution mhN, as a distinct and sub- iluced : tliii anarchy. 1 liotn; it is casv now to show, stnntial clause, the tollowiiig, viz: “ lo the federal , i , that a doctrine, brin-'ing such conse- make nil laws which shall l)o nocossDry and overrule such .Nate laws as ^ for the same power, hke the assumption; and that it is refuted by'plain by this Constitution in the t;overnmerit ot' in? the Const rival Houses ID England; nor and express constitutional provi««ions. I the I . States, or in any department or ol-■ ing !>*• ore lh ute lietween a covemnient rfe think the Government of the C. Sti.:* s does ficer thereof.” If this nieaiw any thing, it ^ give tl.u acc ami in ils place, and expressly as a substi- it, the existing |>rovision was intro- that IS to say, a provision by which Po the federal courts should havo authority to rsoM THr. oiJ> roLANt ricML marking by SUam '—Ilolt'tIL trl !—'I’his sjrh-ndid eBiabhshnient in N ? II. „ ■ ,„,i I York, has lieen oriened scarcely * nu r. )l- inir U'tore the people, and siill unadoptid,] i ' ... q.iences with it, is not welltbunded; that pn.|K>r for carrying into execution the lorej manifest coiUraventinn of llie conslitution. ru7dutTe,.nr;snot\ contest on l>u‘“^ry and going fsnvers, and all other ,>owers v.stul I he writers ol the l ederal.M, m explam- Bovereigns for wars t>f the is it a dispute lietween a povemnient facto, ai»d a government deji case of a division governments, made both are responsible with the duty which people, uuu humlred gentleman atl.i. ordinary, .nj ount ot the matter in terms. | j,, ,he vanoj. r.- engine Other; neither can other: the people are masters of both. This thority naturally belongs to all Govcni- division of power, it is true, is in a great j nients. They all exercise it from neces- extent and interpretation ol th»>sc )Miwcrs measure unknown in Europe. It is the | sjty, and as a consequence of the exercise powers, it must, ot^ nerssitv, judge of the ' the ccHislitutiotml power of the propels «lie machinery fur Ki,; a cylinder, being 3 in number; ibf .\nd in reirnrd. sir. to the iudiciarv, the 'iigain, it the national judiciary was r. Statfs, and treaties; that there shall b«' one ^'upreme (Niurt, and that this .'^u;*n inc sible rcns.>n t:>r having a judicial ,H.wer m I , . 1 . I .• i your ft^t. Our corre««orient Uillv, w this (•overnment, unlc>.s it Ir« tor the sake / . • i “ I ve tried this marhine, arKl nrki it Court shall have apj^llate j»risdicli >n of' * f maintaimng uniformity of j , ,o .-p » all these cases, subject lo such excepti.ms . questioi.s | ||„ engine is applied to a Mill more ful |)ur|MMH) than either of l^te abn««,! has a hatchway rut in each story, tbr which he IS enableti to raise what ii e«l a dumb waiter, which is capable of ot taming a large quantity of bag|aK' if It IS le»ircH by any ol’ his bo«i«icri. may chance to occup) any ooe of ; wventh story rooms, he has not llte tr> of aHreiHling to great a Iteighi la usual way, l»ul »|e|> into this pcrperxli . railway, and i« safi ly landed midwti ?j tween Heaven and lUnh. Ftmn li* I'milfti Sulm TrUgrtfi stitution IS cstablislied by the people of all to which they have surrendered it, aswell by the States- How, then,can a Slate secedc ? the nature of the case, as by clear consti- How can a State undo w hat the whole peo- tutional provisions. In other and ordinary pie have done? How can she absolve her cases, whether a particular law be in con- . ^ _ citizens from their ol>ediencc to the laws of j formity to the constitution of the State, is a , as Congress may nn.k**. It is iinjtossihle ' hikJ laws of Congrea**, and eiiMiring i1» exe-^ the I'nited States? How can she annul question which the State Legislature or ioc.tcaf»e from the geiieralilv of these wonls., cuiion ? Ami d«n‘s ik)I this very uica cl their obligations and oaths? How can the the Stale Judiciary must determine. Ue If a ease arises umler the Const itntion, that uniformity necessarily imply that the con- members r»f her Legislature renounce their all know that these qucstiiHis arise daily in is, if u case ari«e depcnling on the construc-; siniclion given by the national ciKjrts is to j own oaths? Sir, secession, as a revoiu- the Sidle Governments, and are decided by lion of the Coiistiluii*>n, the judicial power j b»r the prfvailiuj{ con.slruction * llow else,! tionary right, is intelligible; as a right to th«.>se Govenimenls; and I know no (lov- of the I’. States extends to it. It roaches sir, is it |M4t>ible that uniU'rmily can be- be proclaimed in the midst of civil como»o- jernment which does not cxcrcise a similar ihe case, the question; it attaches the pow- prcs«-rvcd ’ tions, and asserted at the head of armies, I power. er of th** national j'iriwlicti'in to the ra.sc it-1 (ientlemcn npftear to me, sir, lo look at can understand it. But,* as a practical j Upon general priiKiples, tbcn, the (lOv- self, iti whatever court it may arise or cxi^t; ImiI one side of the qui*Ntion. They rtfgwrd , right, existing under the constitution, and emment of the C. States |>ose«‘tHes this au- and in this c.ise the Supreme Court hns ap-1 only the fiiipjw>^l danger of lruslm» a tiuv- in conformity with its provisions, it seems thority ; and this would hardly be denied, pell.ite jurisliction over all courts whatever. ' pnimeni witli the interpretatiun oi its own to rr.e to be nothing but a plain absurdity : i ^ere it not that there are oth«r Govern- No !an"ua;rc could provide with more of- ^niweis. Hut will they view Iho qu€*stic>n for It suppo«s resistance to Government, j metils. But since there are State Govern- fret nnd precision, th.Tii is here J.me for ui its other a«(»**ct; w ill they show us how under the authority of Government itself; I ntenls, and since these, like other Govern-' suhjfH iiug con^iitulional qiieslions to the it ii |>ossible for a (•overnment to get nlun^ ' It supposes dismemberment, without viola- ment.s, ordinarily construe their own pow- ultimate dfcision of the .Supr*me C urt.— w ith four and twenty intcrpret'Ts of i!* laws ! indi»ilu«l, who bokls a hivhiv ting llie pnnciples ol union; it supposes op. crs, if the Government of Ihe I'. States And, Kir, tins is exactly what the Convcn- anH powe rs? (ienlh men argur, too, n if, oHk-c under th«’ •ppoiniriHM position to law, without crime; it supp«>ses construes its own pmers also, which con- linn found it neces-iiry to provide for, and in these caw's, the Slnt« wouhl be always ;,.^ral Jack«xi, pr.>p.wr«J, lo ih«- ef^iiw the violation of oaths, without resfK>nsibili- struction is to prevail, in the case of oppo- intended to provide for. It is tH>, exactly “ '■ —■ ■*' . i : what the people were univer«.'illy told was done when ttiey ndopietl the '>ti'iifiiii.n. One of the (iri>t resi.lulions ado{ilcd Ly tlie oflhem inu.>l b*' w rong, «re lh'- iiumi Convention wa- in these words, *iV.: " ihiit | imporlant and es^'ntiul o|ioiali.«H of tin the jurisdiction of the rmtional judicinrv ' GovonKMeiit to be e(uharr:ir^-l and arre- which shall last thrfsigh all time. Or, if Congress has passed a lnw as being within shnll extend to cn«e* which respect the coi- j tc,), lircause «»»h' .'^tate h'-lds a contrary o. the common fate of things human must Ix- its just powers; S. Carolirw denies that leciion of the nati-tnal r venue, and «jues. pinmn? Mr. I‘r«."-ideiii. rverv nrsumeot , , expect'-d, at some period to hapjien to it, yet J this law is within its just pow>rs, nnd in- liotm which involve the nati>nil (>eacc uial whi''h referit the cnt>«iiiiiiini)ality of acts (>f t irti to New V«irk that catastrophe 18 Dot aiilici|»alel. jsisistJiat she has the right to decide this liannony.” Nf>w , sir, liu^ either had no to Slate d« i iHit>n, apiwiilB from irf%» • mMj m l*'.lh The instniment contains ample prov is-' fioint, and that her decision is final. How ^ jienxibli* mennin; at all, or elic ii mi'ant ‘ . . cr « . «i in i ions for Its amendment at all limes; none are these questions to be setiM ? ' that the jurisdiction ol'the naii'Kial jiidicia- for Its al»andonment; at anytime. It de- In my opinion, sir, even if the constitution ry should exii rid lo thfsi quesi|.>n with a paramount authorily. It is not t*» lie siip- fKised that the Convention i..tend .1 that tlie power of the nati'mal j idi iary «.|i .iild extend to these questions, uitl that tlx- ju ty; It suf^ioses the total overthrow of Gov- site constructions? Aud again, as in thi em’nent, witSout revolution. ^case now actually iM t'ore us, the Slate (iov- The coastilutton, sir, regards itself as ' eniiiients may undertake, not only to con- perpetual and iminortal. It seeks to estab- strue tlieir ow u powers, hut to decido direcl- iish a union among tlie people of the Stales, * ly on the extent ot' the powers of Conjreas. ' ri;{hl, aiMl Ihe l».-nersl titivernment alwnys w ronp. But, suppose the rever»r; »up(n>*r the .''iHle wroo*. arMf, miKe lliry dirfi r, declares that new Slates may come into the f,f the L'. Slates had made express provis- 1 nion, but it d«s nf»l declare that old I inn for such cases, it would yet be diiricull Slates may jjo out. The I nion is n»i a , to inuintain that, in a constitution existing tem|>orary partnership of State*. It is the !over tour and twenty btates, with equnlau- assTM'iation of tlie people, under a con*»titu- thority over all, one could claim a right of dicatures of the .Slates should also «-\iend tion of (iuvernment, uniting their pfiwer, construing it for the whole. 'I'bis would to them, with Cfju.il power of final tk-ci-iiiHi. joHiinj: together their present enjoyments, iteem a manite.it impropriety—indeed, an I'his would lie lodefeatihe whole object of and birmling, in ooe indivisible mass, all . absurdity. If the constitulion is a govern- the provi>-ion. 'I'lierc were tliirleen juii.-a- lureM already in existence. The evil com- plair»ed of, or the danger lo be guard' d a- gain>>t, was Contradiction anrl n'[ai^nance in the decisirms of thes*» juiiiealur*.-s. If Ihe framers of the conslitiiiion meant to crr^ate to augment Ihe existmc evil, aiil the np- their hope* for the future. Whatsoever is mei:i existing overall tlie States, though steadfast in just political principles—what-; v*,th limited (wwers, it necessarily follows 9f«ver IS permanffnt in the structure >f hu- that, to the extent of those powers', it must man society—whatsoever there is which be biiprcme. Ifit lie not 9U|«rior lo the cao derive an enduring character from be- aulhoritv of a particular State, it is not a ing l>Hjnded on deep laid principles of con- nali.>nar(;overnment. But it is a Govern- t-utulional hl^erty, and on the broad foun- ,iM?nl, as it has a legwlalive power of its own, dalKMis f>f the public will, all these unite to arnl a judicial power co-exten«ive with the entitle this instrument to be regarded as a legislative, the inference is irresistible, that permanent c;>astitulion of Government. j this Government, thus created &j^!he whole. In ihe next place, Mr. Presidt'nl, I con- anj_/or the whole, must have an tenl that there is a supreme law of tlie superior to that of the |iarlicular land, consi'jling ol the constitution, acts of ment of any one part. Congress is the polilicN, that every Government iiiuiit have (.ont-res..* pn«s*d in pur-usnce of it, ami Ihe Lejrislature of all the people of the C. a judicial power co-extensive with its le^is- inihlic treaties, 'i his will not be denied,, States; the Judiciary of the (>cneraM>ov- lalive power'* Certainly, there h only because such are the very words of the ernment is the Judiciary of ail the people this reawn, viz: that the laws may receive constitution. But I CfHitend further, that of the U. States. ’I’o hold, therefore, that a uniform inlorpretation, and a unitorm ex it rightfully belongs to Congress, and to the this I^egislalure and this Judiciary are ecuiioii. 7'his object can l«e no othrrwiso court', of the I . Stales, lo settle the cf>n- ' »ubr>rdtnale in authority to the I^egisiature aliiijlion, of this supreme law, in doubtful and Judiciary of a single State, in doint' cas',*s. '1 his in denied; and here arisc-s the grjal prariiral question. W ho is to con strue finally the conotitution of the U. Slates? Me all agree that the constitution is the irilHinal in all cases of a crsi.sliluiioiuil na ture which assume the shajw of r mjiI, in law or erpiity. Alul I think I cann. I do lx tt> r ih in to leave this part of the sul>j»cl l>v n ading the remaiks made upon it by a f.Hjrieenlh, and yet ii..| to jjivc it fn>w. r , Mr. KlUworih, in the C.aivenli.ai of Coii- this pwfmr in 1 ••‘.Jtl, lo enter into an err* m^nl In enmmunicale to Am broker «.lreel wH'h fiirU as wotild enable him s,- « ulale in iIh’ 'I'x-ks; an«I, tailing to I tin the information ikroagh us, he rr-i on |.> this citv in I and ali.n in I* ' saw the {‘resident** m‘-»Bi;'e, U'fore it ii communiratcd t« Congrriis, in time to ■ m anliriiMilion of Ihrn . pr«-%» : niM] in l*.lti cases, there were h majoritv «o the m.iv.rily ; ,l ap,»e ,1s Wrv.^ht^rii fp.in thecommmi lolereM loo ,«rt.cuUr in-! .rMbvidual to wlvM.. -e r» ter, si; (rom il,e er.un, ils ol all lo thec.ai.Kil ,h„, ,,^.,0 has f,een a corrr^ ol otH-; aisl endeavors to Mii--rs.dc the ^Vr pr» ju.lgn.e,u ol the wlnilc by tU- judguK-nt of; ^ ii part. ^ 1 think It IS clear, sir, that llte rontilu-| ii'»it, bv express proM-.i'>n, by d*'finite aial' nneqiiiviiriil words, as well as by neeei«>«iry impliCitlir.«i; hns coimtitiiled Ihe Supr^-me Court of the Cniied States the appellate Ihe MiLi.rwirvii.Lr, March '.’’’ F.fftis of tkr F.nftTi'ing Hill.— In •• verwali»>n with one of our Bepre-wmiali- since his return from U Bshingtoii, el that prrviinis to the pw«ontF(. itK lorein*; hill, the Cherofcee rlclrgnlKJO. !' al the »»nt of government, for tlie par. of trmtmg fiir Iheir laivN, slmwi'd «■ di«pn«itinn to make a lre«tv ; so mu*"!! > indi-ed, that the Secreinrv of Wnr c« ; ereci that the lw«is of the treaty hsd ■ lo rr;vise and cr.ntnd the decisi.ais of Itie i ncctxnl; a geinlem.in, Mr, who has left U-. ,^„i'J"," .'C ihirlef^n, tlicn tliev («ily intemieii lanJ him, on llic r‘cor*l«t of llic * the whole, pn.‘herKlcfl tUntivr, hy Milt tur- , iiMrlU^cticr am) of (he »ar»nrilv, n« m 11 authority ther, the chances of disconlani judjjments. | well as of the utni.«.| |siriiy und'inte.'.ritv Sm'i« ’ r tJovern- >V hy, sir, has it Is come a sk illed axiom in I of charstler. >• I'his con>tilulion,*’ '’say. ‘ , .L- „,i..:_.. .L... . .. . I .• .1 ... ’ .. .’ aslonisliiiK-Mt, was nrsi iniorm***! ot i- le 'he extent o the Powersoft^ . ^ rreeplio. U • .c K.ral (.ovcrnm. nl. Ii Ihe t.. m ral Le-' islalure should,at any I,me, overleap the.r , ,^„en.en'.r attained. A statute is what it is judicious ly interpreted to lie ; and if it be construed one way in N. Ilarn|>shire, and another way in Georijia, there is no unifirm law. Olio .Sjpreme ('ourt with appdlate and violence to all common sense, and overturn- in{ all estaWished principles. CiMipress must judge of the extent of its own p*jwers so r>ften as it is called on to exercise them, final junsdictifui, i.s the natural and onlv fiupreme law; Ijijt who shall interpret that or it cannot act at all; and it must alsf act adef|uato m«.ans, in any Governuicnt, to •«. ’ I" * '' independent of .State control, or it cannot cure this uniformity. I The ronvomion saw all this clearly ; and The right of State interposition strikes (|,o resolution which I have quoted, never Uw ’ In our system of the division of [>»wer« b*-tween dii!ereiit C>overnments, con troversies will necessarily sf>melimes aris‘, khall‘.1f^Hjndation of the legislative afterwards rescinded! imssed through va- D.isit rest wth Set |x>wer of Congress. It p.«sesses no effec rious modifications, till it finally received I - I r I I h th Gt-nnraU.ovemmeni, five legislative power, if such right of Stale the form which the article now wears in ndeniably true, constitution I judicial power, t>ii national constitution was r^leridii that eaeh f., t r r iramro, arm w lillo tllC wliole CWintry Was coolend- that each . late may judjje for il. ^ K»e of Mir four and twenty States might encac' d m discuKinf/ its merits one of ii. M^lf ofany allege,) >„.lation of the const,tu- hid defiance lo it, authority; Without ex- m.fst di.stinguS adv^te^ lion, ami may tmallv d.c.de lor itself, and pre«. provision m the eonMi'lulion, therefore, v,n,] told trX^l/th,T U im-y execute lU own decmions hy Us own ,ir, this whole «u. Mion wce»sarilv deci- i„ eLiL„ ^ ‘ 1 V . 1 j ’ tww»T ■Vil the rerciit in « i .1 i n is IM (,«^riiy a«xi m controversies rcdaling lo the Itoundary ]K]iwvr. .til me r* r prfjcM^jmgs in n. rlcn hy lhos- provisions which create ii .1 . • • 1 . .1 . . t'nrolina are fiiiindetl on ihinel«.m 1 1 . . ^ a tXJiween the two jurisliCtions, the trihunu t nroima are lounufu on inisClaim ol riffht. lej^ihlntue pjwcr and a indicia nower. If url.;^-!. ..1. . 7 . j 1 . 1 ■ n„ co„. ,ho . aov./uuK..« f:-Sr “ . ... • , . . '• required but the formaliiH* ‘l n.ei,l ol h.K country, pr.M,U of the ch ure.t „ ^vhen k: ■o soon as the law for forcin,; w was p«H'««.d, Ihe Herrrlary, I'l . . .,.1 r.: aslonishmrnf, was first inform«'«l oft G ’ ifisl r . , ■ . , ' o'E ni wnai ii .mils, the judicial ,h.,diriment IS 0 con.^litu. f,.: i(ai.il check. II the I mte. .Slates go ls»- Prrsi.Unt, ns lllcv »miIv wailed irfj 1 e cor.Tr' ^’i I “ " return to Cherokee. I tlie constitution dK.ti not nuthoriz*, it ii [Kfcooi*? void ; and the judiciary |Niwer, the national' judjies who, lo *.cure their imoarlnihty,, A corro«pon.Ieni in Ihe New York Far- are to lie made independent, will declare .11 mer, give. the f.dlowuig u-eful hinU tol - lol^ void. On the other hand, if the SiHlen •• Mo«t pers..ns w hen thcv •"* go hey.Hul Iheir limits; il th«*y make a l.w ' to wash their black craiie veils, usr riK which IS a u-urpalion up.n the (Jeneral; i{ar. Washed with cofU-e, or ruhhed t,ovenirn«nl, the law is void, and upright,; n cloth wet with co|Tih>, ifives them a inde,«ndenl judges will declare It to Ik* s.,.” 2l.«,y black and brighter app.-arinrr.- And let rnc now only n»hJ, sir, that, in . I^oinlja/ine flroMCH urf' rkiined in the Ihe very firnt session of tho first ('onj^re^lJ nay. Mont l.iilini confiiJrr il with all Iheso well known objects, both of! that the tca-kcttle has Ix.ihil, and if* the Cfmvenlion and the p»-o|»le, full and lh" w>iier l>o always boiling hot wbeiiiiH fresh in his nund. Mr. Ellsworth n-ported isiured mlo n leu'pot. '|'o make a t"" the bill, as is4»enerally unlerslK>d, f„r ||,e i dish of lea, scald the lea fx.l, fmt m lh*; i»« | ori^anization i>f the judicial department,; |s>ur on two .r three table.spooiifuU •*'V j and, in that hill, nmde provision for Ihej ter, let it slaml a few scchuIs, simI then lii exercise^of this Qppellnin power of the Sii-1 np water lioiling hot every time Ihe ten f» preme Court, in all tho pro|icr casex, m is filled ; the kellle should be pre»n^/ whatsoever court arising ; nnd that this ap-! put on tborc.” pellalo power has now Inen exercised for | - InT 'Ir " r.'Jrynn A/,Mon4.-Tho ish-ci,.I.^ « and withrmt doubt. ! ,v., vv.nlevan Missionary S.n..ety, for H- hof V V’ r I V'*'ir Midiii^r I)ccem^K•r 31st, I‘-.'f.',«trW- tofore the courts, those political qiioslions ed £ «lerlin^, or /tro which terminate wuh the cBaf;ttneii(» oi cUecnihouMand doUurt,
North Carolina Whig (Charlotte, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
April 20, 1833, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75