I
Page 18 The Chronicle
NO GIMMICKS ?
JUSTOOOl
I j/^vKBA'
I 832 N. Liberty 8
I PHONE 724-9201
== VINES ONE-HO
? Cleans It B
-h> - 90b N* L!
WINSTON?
1 prvr\
[ IU-J
_ .BBg
I fpE
TH
?I *
_ ?... T
irigaruit
Hamburg
_____ SW
Hot Dos
IMON'-FjU8:30-3:30
Saturday April 2, 1977
- NO WILD CLAIMS 1
> BATTERIES inn
jsed3
f Sozea to H! most ??
American and Foreign
Cars; Trucks; Lawn
Mowers. ?tc- ? I
NOW AVAILABLE
Aircraft and Moforcycle
Batteries.
'ARTER, GDfOtATOt SERVICE?
ntRYCO.iNC. I
t. wtncton-soMm N.C. I I
? rOUMPED 1916 J
UR DRYCLEANERS
etter,, Quicker" r>
IBERTY ST
SALEM, N C / ^
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSJ
zo&i
21QM?
IVVI . ft
I
E HOAGIE
ANNOUNCING!!!
GREAT HOAGIE SPEC
. O w ?w
Ljjt?fjjruu
2r,er & Fries
PEi? ?Duppei
(Fixed As You Like ,L
724-1649
420 N. Trade St.
4.
ft
Greg Williams
Shrkiilrl
w^r u MS*/?/*>?/
Should saccharin be banned?
Since results of tests
^conducteds in Canada show-?
ed that large doses of the
artificial sweetener saccharin
caused cancer in rats, the
Federal Food and Drug
Administration has banned
its use.
yrvidQ}8?ever, a great many
/Ameciimns feel the results of
the tests are inconclusive
and aer asking that the ban
be lifted.
This week the 14 Man in the
Street" asked city residents
if they felt saccharin should
be banned. Here is how
Gsome of them replied:
Robin Manns answered,
T 1- it '
iesr i miriK me pan is a
good idea. I don't like the
taste of artificial sweeteners.
Besides,?if?there?is any?
possibility of it causing
cancer it should be banned.''
f ^rom n?cc^\
L;getworms.
~ A Sergeant s
the pet care people
? 1977 Mill*f Morton Company, a subsidiary o<
A H Robins Co Richmond, Virginia 23730
? 7* '
1
JVirM It I
t Call For .11
Pick-up ||
:/al IP
i ~~lll
V """ * -j99?
w 155c
SAT
8:30-2:30
CLOSED SUNDAY
/
t.f. lii.-.ini - , ^ JM^MEggPPfSgj^g , >*T*#trw^wrr-riW
Teretha Mickle
Man In The Street
Saccharin Bt
V.. Gregory
Williams remarked,
^1 think the bain should
- be lifted. Saccharin is helpful
to diabetics. Without artificial
sweeteners they don't
have anything to resort to
except sugar and this is
hazardous to their health.
Saccharin is also of great
help to people who must
restrict their caloric intake/'
Teretha Mickle reasoned,
4 4 If there is definite proof
that it is a health hazard or
that it causes cancer than itshould
be banned. I don't
really know if it is hazardous
but I'm going to stop using
it. There must be a reason
for the ban/' ?
Willie Jones commented,
"I think the ban should be
liftecT I donTthink it's that
?bad. It s less hazardou;rthan
a cigarette. My wife hasn't
stopped using it."
Cathy Jones replied, 4'I
think the ban should be
lifted .?It' s been tested in Canada
but not here. I don't
MBSMBSSSBSaaSS 'II 1 il I il I I I il I
o "
t,
Willie Jones
3 Banned?
think it's anymore hazardous
than anything else."
Hubert Snell stated,
think the ban is stupid, I've
been using artificial sweeteners
and drinking diet
drinks for ten years and thats
why I weigh 230 instead of
320 now. If the government
wants to ban something why?
not cigarettes or alcohol or
something that nobody
needs."
Angela Cline said, "The
ban should never have been
imposed. As much saccharin
as they gave those rats they
had to die. I'm a diabetic and
hflVP KruirrKf o ?-1 - - ?
? "?? t v- CI OVUV/IVpiitJ QI
saccharin. I plan to continue
to use it as long as I can get
it."
The majority of persons
asked said they felt the
saccharin ban should ~~ be
lifted. The majority of those
-who use it said they will
continue and most had little
faith?in the tests "that
resulted in the ban.
lACH'S Jl
t ttiKU nu? (<m, I
EGGS i|
?r i(??>Ar>rurwr
FILED |3K
FER BASKETS M
f Characters and toys \j7n>c)
e Baskets and thrill the
"oo! There is a wide
>n for your choosing at
nngs! LOW PRICES!
29 to $2" j|j - - -