5A
OPINIONS/The Charlotte Post
January 11,1996
Universities
losing monopoly
on education
D.G, Martin
The coining of the new year reminds us how
quickly times change. Faster and faster and
closer to home these changes come.
Change, refocus, compete, find better ways of
doing things.
Or step aside.
That is the message for American business,
government, and people these days.
What about our universities? Are they rocks
of stability and towers of strength in an other
wise uncertain American landscape? Or are
they just as threatened and challenged as oth
ers?
I hesitate to try to answer. I treasure the sta
bility and order and safety that undergirds
strong academic communities. But colleges and
universities are not magically unaffected by
changing times. They will have to adapt and
change in response to the different circum
stances, too.
Or step aside.
Among the challenges before American high
er education is the probable loss of several of
its "monopolies." These include:
(1) The monopoly of location. Students who
want to participate in the higher education
experience have almost always had to come to
the university classrooms. But new technology
permits high speed, high quality interaction of
teachers and learners at different places.
There is so much thinking, talking, and writ
ing about the many challenges and conse
quences that come from the loss of this "class
room" monopoly that I only mention it here.
(2) The monopoly of access to information.
Great libraries, collections of other research
materials, and groups of scholars have made
university campuses the entry gate to partici
pation in research and scholarship. But the
new electronic linkups will soon make it possi
ble for any of us to have access to all the infor
mation in the best university libraries - and
contacts with great minds all over the world -
ivithout leaving home. In an earlier column I
shared with you some of my thoughts about
the revolutionary impact on our universities of
this democratization of scholarship.
(3) The monopoly of credentialing. For much
of this century, a college diploma has been a
basic key to participation at the top levels of
American life. It has been the distinction
between those who were presumptively quali
fied for the best jobs and those who would have
to prove themselves - or work their way up -
just to get a chance.
The rest of the community has trusted uni
versities and colleges to define what is needed
and to (ietermine how best to provide it.
But as the cost of higher education increases
- whether paid by the students and parents or
by the government - those who are paying are
beginning to look for alternative "keys to par
ticipation.
As reported in a recent edition of The
Chronicle of Higher Education, some govern
ment leaders are already threatening to take
this monopoly away from the college and uni
versity community.
Colorado Gov. Roy Romer, acknowledging
that the certification of what has been learned
has always been the role of the university, now
asserts, "We are coming to the age where that
is going to be blown apart." As an alternative
to the university diploma, Romer is pushing for
an institution or procedure "where we certify
and verify for the student and the employer
that learning has occurred."
According to the Chronicle, Romer thinks a
certification process can be designed to go
beyond mere job competencies. "This method is
applicable to civics, ethics, politics, art."
If leaders like Gov. Romer get their way, and
such certificates take the place of college diplo
mas as the passport to participation, how bad
will it hurt our colleges and universities?
For those who only seek the "passport," col
leges and universities may no longer be essen
tial.
But for those who believe that higher educa
tion is more than just acquiring a set of skills
and a certificate, the campus community expe
rience will always be one of life's great treasur
ers - and a "monopoly that I believe will
always be secure.”
D.G. MARTIN is vice president for public
affairs for the University of North Carolina sys
tem.
"... the campus community experience will
always be one of life's great treasurers- -
and a 'monopoly that I believe will always
be secure. ’
A different kind of dream
Herbert
L, White
America is a different place
from April 4, 1968.
When Martin Luther ICing
Jr.’s life was cut short by an
assassin’s
King
bullet that
day, he was
nearly five
years
removed
from his “I
Have A
Dream”
speech that
foretold a
society
where deci-
skin color
I was 5
sions based on
would be eliminated,
years old, a skinny, bespecta
cled boy growing up in the
country outside of
Wilmington. I remember look
ing at our black-and-white
television set that evening
when NBC news anchor Chet
Huntley suddenly flashed
across the screen to announce
King’s death. I remember
national leaders getting on
television to urge the nation to
stay calm and not take to vio
lence in the streets. Looking
back, that message was
intended for black folks, who
probably figured there was
nothing to lose that night.
America’s urban core burned,
and The Dream took a beat
ing, too.
Today, African Americans
are looking to fulfill their own
destiny not by chastising the
larger society to accept us, but
by taking it upon ourselves to
carry the load. For all the pos
turing about who did us
wrong and owes us a break,
the fact is we’re more capable
of raising our boats than any
one uptown, in Raleigh or
Washington. Government and
corporate entities should be
held responsible to address
our concerns and sanctioned
when they ignore them, but
Americans traditionally have
helped themselves first. Our
history is a living testament to
that.
As a child of the post-civil
rights era, I didn’t have to live
through church firebombings
and lynchings intended to
keep so-called negroes in their
place. But it never hurts to
look back through the prism of
history to see that we haven’t
come as far as Dr. King envi
sioned. Blacks face severe
challenges that were unheard
of even 10 or 15 years ago.
We’re one of the fastest-grow
ing groups of people suffering
from AIDS; unemployment is
still generally higher than
other ethnic groups, and for
black men and teens, it’s even
worse. We’re quick to split our
families with divorce and slow
to live up to our parental com
mitment to nurture and raise
our children. And the most
dangerous people in our com
munities don’t wear white
sheets; too often they’re young
people packing automatic
weapons and a chip on their
shoulder. It’s a different
world, all right.
But change is in the air.
There’s a new commitment to
the black community that’s
coming from African
Americans, which manifests
itself every day in Charlotte
and across the country. We
are joining to rid our neigh
borhoods of drug pushers and
criminals. We’re becoming
more entrepreneurial, and
preaching an end to govern
ment dependence, something
that’s long overdue. Last
year’s Million Man March,
though repudiated by some of
our friends and reviled by our
enemies, was a shining
moment in the history of black
people in America. Its mes
sage was clear: African
Americans can be knocked
down, but we’re not going to
stay there for long.
Perhaps the most encourag
ing thing is the embracing of
our own heritage, customs and
institutions. There’s a
renewed sense that black peo
ple are capable of competence
in all endeavors. For all its
good points, desegregation
had its drawbacks. Our busi
nesses, homes and institutions
suffered, overrun by people
trying their darndest to get
out of black communities. As
things turned but, all that
glitters isn’t gold, not because
it’s bad, but to make rules,
one has to own the game.
What would King think of
African Americans today? I
don’t know, but we’re making
strides to achieve The Dream
in our own way. Maybe Dr.
King would’ve approved.
HERBERT L. WHITE is edi
tor of The Charlotte Post.
The forgotten ones: Minority teachers
By William R. Davis Jr.
SPECIAL TO THE POST
The urgent cry of every
major or minor American
school system is: We need
minority teachers. While this
is a known fact, what are we,
the minority teachers, to do
about the problems that we
experience within these sys
tems that so badly need us?
Every American school
superintendant scratches his
or her head to think of ways
to attract minority teachers to
their system. They usually
send a representative to scout
the best talent to complete a
projected goal for that particu
lar year. However, the num
bers individuals who are cer
tified fully are very small
indeed (figures that are
based on writer's knowledge).
The individuals that are
secured for possible employ
ment in these systems are
those who have the desire to
teach, but lack certification to
insure full licensure by each
individual state. Thus, the
individual is hired to to teach
in these school systems at the
mercy of the various state
institutions of higher learn
ing. They are given long pro
grams of study to complete,
and often times programs that
really almost certifies them of
obtaining a master's degree in
their area of study.
While I may speak from
experience, it becomes very
disconcerting to work in envi
ronments that start out as
being ideal, and turn into
complete nightmares before
your eyes. The teaching pro
fession may not be as glam
ourous as a stock broker, or
CEO of a Fortime 500 compa
ny, but, it does have its
rewards - student success
and achievement. It is this
achievement and success that
teachers try to give their all to
insure will take place and will
continue throughout each
child’s life upon earth.
However, the minority
teacher, depending upon the
geographical locale, may be
viewed among his or her peers
as being unskilled and inde-
quate in completing the task.
Feeling of isolation
group. It is with this in mind,
that some minority teachers
feel as though they are the
true "forgotten ones." Having
taught under provisional
guidelines for two southern
states, I have experienced
the worst of these forms of iso
lationism; the latter being
very mild, but noticeable. It
was in my very first year of
teaching that I experienced
this at its best. I was hired to
take over a class of upper mid
dle schoolers in the middle of
the year. Having been warned
by my peers in a southern
school district (Georgia), I
continued to seek employment
at this particular school, was
interviewed and secured the
position. I began teaching the
second semester of that year
with the knowledge that I was
provisionally certified and
that I was actively seeking
full certification in the state.
I was assigned to a mentor
teacher on my hall whose
basic function was to help
guide me through some of the
problems that I would
encounter along the way, and
that I was to actively seek the
advice of the members of my
team throughout the entire
school day, if needed. The
relationship between the team
and myself had worked fine
for about two to three months,
until there was a problem
with one of the students in my
classes. There was an incident
of which I informed my team
involving this student and
fully disclosing the problems
that I was encountering in
other classes.
The mentor teacher listened,
but didn't take in all that was
said, merely shrugging off the
entire incident. I was asked to
come to the principal's office
for a conference to discuss
what had happened with this
particular child with the
child's parent. The parent was
very ornery and disagreeble,
and even cursed me in the
presence of the principal, with
no apology demanded by the
principal from this parent. It
was from this incident that
the principal's lack of effort to
respond that I began to formu
late the theories of conspiracy
and distrust of the members of
my team and the lack of sup
port from the principal.
with the parent’s name at the
bottom. Having noticed this, I
told those persons down at
the central office of the prob
lems I was having and the
nature of the letter, as well as,
the name of parent who was
receiving a copy of a confiden
tial memo. 'The principal’s
response was that it was a
mistake and to disregard the
parent’s name on that memo.
I was not confident that there
was any truth to that.
The actions that followed
caused me to seek increased
comaradery with fellow
minority teachers; teachers
who had many years of expe
rience, as well as the only
African American assistant
principal present at the
school. I was placed under
constant watch and severe
patrol by the members of this
particular team and given lit
tle or no respect as to proper
classroom etiquette (entering,
retrieving students, and leav
ing a classroom). This had
become a constant problem
and had begun to effect my
daily routine of performance;
causing the effect of my
health. The problems did not
subside at all, and had even
escalated to the point of me
asking for a behavior special
ist to come in with classroom
tips on curtailing the prob
lems. The first specialist was
quite rude, but did offer some
advice. The second was very
considerate and understood
the problems that I was hav
ing and offered many ways
that became quite helpful to
me in my second try at the
profession. To no avail of any
type of reconsideration, both
principals (white) adamently
asked me to resign my posi
tion after evidence of improve
ment; refusing to sign any
type of transfer to another
school; causing me to seek
another site for possible rehire
at another location.
In today's school environ
ment, especially in the mod
ern middle school environ
ment and team teaching, the
minority teacher is more so
thought of as a "token" or tag-
along. Often, being rejected or
isolated from the functioning
In response to the incident,
the principal sent a letter in
my box about the concerns of
the parent that were dis
cussed behind closed doors.
The memo sent to me read on
the bottom those individuals
who were to receive copies
Finally, having been
informed of not receiving a
contract and putting the mat
ter in the hands of a higher
authority associated with the
local teachers union, I left the
county for another state to
seek yet another teaching
opportunity This event alone
has given a clear picture of
the problems associated with
minority teachers and the rea
sons for them being called the
"forgotten ones."
Former Charlotte resident
WILLIAM DAVIS JR. is a
teacher in the Maury County
(Tenn.) school system.
Letters to The Post
Don't censure black history
I had to call Discovery Place to find out if Rudy
Cooper, vice president of exhibits, research and
planning, was Afro-American or white. My
thoughts after reading the article ("Blockade of
black history," Jan. 4) was 'He must be white.'
When I called, the receptionist informed me he
was an Afro-American. How saddened I was to
hear this.
Factual information and truthful information is
reality. Only ignorance is shown in trying to hide,
escape from reality and considered deplorable in
my eyes. For someone to be vice president of
exhibits, research and planning and try to hide,
not bring to light the facts of history, is totally
unacceptable. "Who are you trying to hide, sup
press this information from our children, white
America? Our young Afro-American children,
most of all, must be informed of our history and
culture. The Jewish people never ever let us for
get their terrible plight. Why should we as Afro-
Americans?
I'll never forget my first time visiting
Charleston, S.C. I had wanted to go there for so
long to see some of my history and culture. I knew
the slave ships came there and slaves were sold,
but I wanted so much to see what exhibits were
preserved. I wanted to know and feel within my
heart and soul what my people went through. I
stood in front of a building where the slaves were
sold, silently taking it all in, trying to grasp a
smell, a feel of something from the past to let my
body, soul and mind know what really took place
at this spot. It was very moving to me. I felt so
proud to be black.
I'm not ashamed for what my people had to
endure. I don't like what they went through, but
never, ever ashamed. We as black people sur
vived, and we are survivors. Don't rob our chil
dren of knowing the truth, even if it hurts. It will
help us all to know and remember. How we
choose to use this knowledge is up to each indi
vidual, but don't ever suppress us from knowing
the truth. Hopefully, we will never see that time
again, nor anyone else.
It's our right to know what happened. Don't you
decide for our people.
-Barbara Morris
Charlotte
Perking N.C.
economy keeps state
revenues growing
By Dennis Patterson
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
RALEIGH - North Carolina’s economy is perk
ing right along, bringing more money than antici
pated into the state’s tax coffers, even after fac
toring in a cut in personal income taxes and
elimination of the intangibles tax.
That trend has legislative leaders talking cau
tiously about another round of tax cuts when the
General Assembly returns in May. But a wild
card in their plans is Congress, which still is
thrashing out a budget that could cost the state
hundreds of millions of dollars.
When legislators drew up a two-year budget last
year, they based it on projections that tax collec
tions would grow by 5.7 percent this year. That
projection was based on expectations for steady
growth in the state’s economy.
But instead of 5.7 percent, the state’s t2ix collec
tions from July to November grew by 7 percent,
$47.1 million more than legislators had predicted.
Analysts are cautious about predicting the sur
plus that will be available when the full fiscal
year ends June 30. In previous years, the surplus
recorded by November had tripled or quadrupled
by the end of the year.
Only in the disastrous year of 1991-92 did the
state show a surplus in November that had
become a deficit seven months later.
In 1993-94, for instance, legislators predicted
surplus tax collections of just over $100 million.
But at the end of the year, actual collections
showed more than $300 million in surplus funds.
The trend continued in 1994-95, with more than
$300 million in surplus collections.
It was those back-to-back years of large surplus
es, due in large part to conservative forecasts of
the state’s economic growth, that allowed law
makers last year to cut taxes.
David Crotts, the legislature’s senior fiscal ana
lyst, told legislative leaders two weeks ago that
the state does not need much new growth in the
second half of the fiscal year to stay in black ink.
Taxes do not come in 12 regular monthly pay
ments. Instead, some months show a boom in col
lections for specific kinds of taxes, while other
months lag.
About a quarter of all the sales taxes collected
each year by the state come in November and
December, during the Christmas sales season, for
instance. It is why the selling season is as critical
for the state as it is for merchants.
On a month-by-month basis, analysts had antic
ipated a more robust economy and heavier tax
collections in the first half of the year than in the
last half, Crotts said. That means the state’s
economy can cool off a little in the last six months
and still generate enough taxes to pay for the
budget.
"For the rest of the fiscal year, on an economic
basis, we only have to have a 2 or 2.5 percent
growth rate to meet the (revenue) targets,” Crotts
said.
The projection gives legislative leaders some
comfort that they won’t be looking at a shortfall
this year, like the $1.2 billion hole that opened in
the budget in 1991.
Business interests argue that the corporate tax.
rate of 7.75 percent is too high when compared to
states competing for industry. That argument
comes despite studies, including one financed by '
business, that showed North Carolina is not a
high-tax state when all taxes are taken into
account.
DENNIS PATTERSON covers North Carolina
government for The Associated Press.
mm