Newspapers / The Danbury Reporter (Danbury, … / Jan. 6, 1905, edition 1 / Page 3
Part of The Danbury Reporter (Danbury, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
The Genuine 1 W ROGERS BROS! I If Spoons, Forks, Knives, etc. JW J have all the qualities in design, work- ' y I manship and finish of the best ster- t 1 M ling silver, at one-fourth to one-eighth | *H" AW thccost ' *2?" Much of the sterling now on the j market is entirely too thin and light j & for practical use, and is far in ferior in every way to "Silver h \ Ask your deal" for "1847 ROGERS b A ? \ BROS." Avoid substitutes. Our full (f\ f\ /") 1 I trade-mark is "1847 ROGERS BROS." I /) IV\ I I look for it. Sold by leading dealers \\\ lI J / I everywhere. Before buying write for I \ J MERIOEN BRITANNIA CO., MwMan, Con a. fIP IV e Wish Our Frienils a fiappy id Prosperous flew Tear and we want to thank you all for the very liberal patron; age given us daring the fall months. Our friends have patronized' freely, and thanks to your kind, jvvors we still Lead All Other Houses in Pounds and Prices. We. truly appreciate this liberal patrourge, and want to say that in sticking to old PIEDMONT doing the right thing for yourself, and shall never lose anything by doing so. Come to see us whenever you come to market and you shall get every dollar the buyer can stand on your tobacco. Your friends, M. W. NORFLBBT K €O. WINSON, jr. a FIRST SALE DAYS : FOR JAN UAH V—Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays. FOK FEBRUA/fY—Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays. FOR MARCH—Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays. THE OLD RELIABLE Brown's Warehouse I.oad« llw market every year in Ihe histliest average prices for tobacco. Talk is cheap, but it take* work to make averages. Bring your tobacco to Brown's and every |HU> shall have close attention and bring the very highest market price. Our new Auctioneer, Mr. Jack Palmer, stays with every pile till he geU the very last bid (lossible on it. First Sale Dnvs for January 1905 -Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays. •• " " February, liKJo —Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays. » " » " March, 1905—Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays. We thank you for your liberal patronage I'or the past :!2 years, and last year especially, and hope by hard work to have the same in the future. Brown's is Headquarters for High Prices Your friends. BROWN & CARTER, MNE & SHIPLEY, Wholesale and Retail Manu - • factnrers and Jobbers of HARK ESS. HV tt!*h to call the attention of our Mends and customers to our large and excellent line of Harness, Saddles, Bridles, Collars. Halters, Line*. Lap Robes, 110-sc! Covers and Saddle Blankets, Whips. Harness Oils and Harness Dressing, Axle Oil, Axle Grease and all pals nf Harness, iu fact everything in the harness Hue. Wn have made special efforts in manufacturing harness and saddlery ami we can sell you stylish and sub stantial goods as low as the lowest, Your patronage solicited. IIINB & SHIPLEY, 444 Trade Street, Winston* N. C. Sign, Gray Horse. u CALENDAR FOR JANUARY SPECIAL TERM, 1905, OF STOKES SU PERIOR COURT Monday, January 23, Tuesday, January 24, Wednesday, January 25, and Thursday, January 26, for the trial of criminal actions, and bb many days thereafter as may bo necessary. FRIDAY, JANUARY 27. Robt T. Joyce vs. Alpha J. Joyce. N.O. Petreo for plaintifF. Kutie Webster vs. Dnniel R. Webster. N. O. Petree for plain tiff. J. W. Shelton vs. Sallie Shel ton. J. D. Humphreys for plain tiff. SATURDAY, JANUARY 28. MOTIONS. MONDAY, JANUARY 30. Darian Smith vs. D. W. Dodd et al. R. D. Reid for plaintff. G. fc M. for defendants. Nannie E. Rierson, admx. vs. Joel I. Blackburn, Ex. King, Watson and Buxton for plaintiff, Joyce for defendant. Nannie E. Rierson, Admx., vs. Joel 1. Blackburn, Ex., King, Watson and Buxton for plaintiff, Joyce for defondaut. S. T. Keiger, Ex., et al. vs. Lon nie Coe, et nl. N. O. Petree for plaintiffs, J. D. Humphreys for defendants. E. J. Davis vs. T. M. Lawson. C. O. McMichael for plaintiff, J. & P. for defendant. J. W. Clianey vs. Frank Card well, et al. Mrs. Carrie Gann vs. J. E. Shel ton. G. M. & H. for plaintiff, Watson and Buxton fordefeudant. TUESDAY, JANUARY 31. R. R. Boyles vs. Frank Hall. VV. B. & W. & King for plaintiff, G» M. & H. for defendant. Ada J. Gregory, et al, vs. Mas ten Mabe, et al. Joyce, J. &P. & N. O. Petree for plaintiffs, J. D Humphreys, Staok, G. & M. for defendants. • Ephriam Moore vs. Laura S. McKinney. J. D. Humphreys for plaintiff, J. &P.& N. O. Petree for defendant. Laura S. McKinney vs. Eph riam Moore. J. &P.&N. O. Pe tree for plaintiff, J. D. Hum phreys for defendant. W. W. King, et al, vs. S. J. Harris. N. O. Petree and Watson & Buxton for plaintiff, Reuben D. Reid for defendant. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1. W. H. Kiser. et al, vs. Susan Cromer, et al. Joyce, J. & P. & P. W. Glidewell for plaintiffs, Watsou & Buxton and N. O. Pe tree for defendants. S. C. Hill vs. Wm. Watts. J. & P. for plaintiff, Watson & Buxton for defendant. G. W. Rakestraw vs. J. W. Hen nis. C. O. McMichael for plain tiff, N. O. Petree and J. D. Hum phreys for defendant. J. W. Henuis and wife vs Da rian Smith, et al. N. O. Petree and J. D. Humphreys for plain tiffs, C. O. McMichael for defend ants. G. W. Rakestraw vs. J. W. Hen nis. C. O. McMichael for plain tiff, N. O. Petree and J. D. Hum. phreys for defendant. B. F. Pulliam vs. Board County commissioners. L. M. Swink & A. H. Eller for plaintiff, N. O. Pe tree for defendant. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 2. Smith Hughes vs. N. & W. Railway Co. Carter & Lewellyn for plaintiff, Watson & Buxton and Joyce for defendant. J. C. Wall, adrar. vs. Clarendon Abbott, et al. King for plaintiff, N. O. Petree for defendants. B. C. Shore & Co. vs. T. Horn aday, Agent Southern Express Co. F. B. Thomas & Co. vs. C. F. Lewis, et al. J. D. Humphreys and N. O. Petree for plaintiffs. King, G. M. & H. for defendants. J. M. Taylor vs. S. J"! Harris. King for plaintiff. J. M. Taylor vs. S. J. Harris. King for plaintiff. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3. Alice Nunn & Husband vs. W. U. Telegraph Co. N. O. Petreo and J. D. Humpreys for plaintiffs, King, & K. & K. for defendant. T. J. Gann vs. J. M. Vernon. G. M. & H. for plaintiff, King for defendant. » W. H. Amos vs. Carrie Gann & Husband. C. O. McMichaol &8. & R. for plaintiff. F. G. Crutchfield and wife vs. J. M. Galloway. Watson, Buxton & Watson for plaintiffs. SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 'OS. MOTIONS. MONDAY, FEBRUARY 6, PJO:-. Virginia & Carolina Chemical Co. vs. S. J. Harris. J. M. Neal vs. J. W. Cofer. J. D. Humphreys for plaintiff, P. W. Glidewell and N. 0. Petree ft r defendant. J. W. Slate vs. R. L. Stewart. J. D. Humphreys for plaintiff, Griffith for defendant. W. T. Johnson & wife vs. J. C. Wall, Admr. W. B. & W. for plaintiffs. King & N. O. Petree for defendant. J. M. Reynolds and wife vs. A. J. Wall, et al. Patterson for plain tiffs. TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7. I. D. Barr vs. W. J. Johnson, et al. Watson & Buxton and N. O. Pe tree and Joyce for plaintiff, J. & P., J. D. H. & G. M. & H. for de fendants. Mattie East & husband vs W. J. Simmons, admr. A. H. Eller for plaintiffs, N. O. Petree for defend ant. E L. Martin vs. Rhoda E. Fal lin, admx. J. & P., J. D. Hum phreys and Watson & Buxton for plaintiffs, King, C. O. McMichael S. & R. &N, (). Petroe for de fendant. MOTION DOCKET. Venable vs. Venable, et al. King for plaintiffs, Watson & Buxton and J. & P. for defend ants. Fallin admx. vs Shepperd. King for plaintiff, J. D. Hum phreys for defendant. Grabs vs. Insurance Co. J. & P. for plaintiffs, J. T. M. for de fendant. Rierson, et al vs. Robertson, et al. VV. B. &W. for plaintiffs. Shepperd vs. Shepperd. J. D. Humphreys for plaintiff, W. W. King for defendant. Cromer vs. Bitting. P. W. Glidewell ami N. O. Petree for plaintiff, J. D. Humphreys for de fendant. Pratt & Co. vs. Chaffin & Co. J. D. Humphreys and N. O. Petree for plaintiffs, King, W. B. & W. for defendants. Wilson vs. Wilson. J. D. Hum phreys for plaintiff. Pearce vs Lynch. King for plaintiff, N. O. Petree for defend ant. George vs. Covington. N. O. Petree for plaintiff, King, W. B. & VV. for defendant. White vs. White. J. D. Hum phreys and N. O. Petree for plaintiff. Goin vs. Pearce, et al. N. O. Petree for plaintiff, King for de fendants. Wall, admr. vs. Smith. King & N. O. Petree for plaintiff. Stewart, admr. vs. Perguson. King, J. & P. and J. D. Hum phreys for plaintiff, W. B. & W. for defendant. Gibson vs. Pell, et al. King for plaintiff, N. O. Petree for defend ants. Hartman, admx. vs. Flinchum. J. D. Humphreys and N. O. Pe tree for plaintiff. Hooker, admr. vs. Southern R. R. Co. J. D. Humphreys and N. O. Petree for plaintiff, King for defendant. Shepperd vs. Lackey. King and J. D. Humphreys for plaintiff, N. (). Petree, Watson & Buxton, Joyce for defendant. Cases not reached on the day set for trial will bo taken up on the next, or succeeding days, in their order. Motions will be heard at any time, at the convenience of the Court. December the 20th, 15)01. M. T. CHILTON, i Clerk Superior Court. NOTICE. • ■ State of North Carolina,? In Superior Court. Stokew County. > Liiikloii J. Duncan) Summon.- for relief—before vh. 5 the Clerk. JameH T. Duncan, bailie Duncan, Theriwi Duncan. F! 11 lotto Duncan, Oncar K. Duncan, Potor Duncan, Henry J. Duncan. State of North Carolina, to the Sheriff of Stokew County, greeting: You arc commanded, t> summon James T. Duncan, Salli« Duncan, Theresa nun can, Elliotie Duncan, Oscar E. Duncau, Peter Duncan and He nry J. Duncan, the defendants above named, if they be found with!n your county, to appear at the Office of the Clerk Superior Court, for the county of Stokes on the 11th day of Feb. 1005 and answer the complaint, a copy ol which will he deposited in the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of said County within ten days from the date of this summons, and let the defendants ta/re notice that if they fail to answer the said complaint at that time, the plaintiflk will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com plaint. Ileruoffail not and of this sum mons maJte cme return. Given under my hand, this 2nd day of Jan. 1005. M. T. CHILTON C. S. C. Stokes County. State North Carolina, ) In Superior Court, Stokes County.} Before the Clerk, l.andon J. Duncan, Plff.,/ va. f Or«ler. James T. Duncan, et a). Deft*. In the above entitled action, it appearing to the Court, upon affidavit tiled, that J a*, T. Dun can, one oftne defendant* in *;tid case, i* a non resident of the State of North Carolina, and can not, alter due diligence, be found thciein, and cannot be personally served with process, and is a necessary party to thi* aofion, the .-nine being an action tor the partition of the lands of Lan .ion Duncan. Br. It i* thereforo ordered by the court that pub lication of auinruons be made for four successive weeks in the Danhury Reporter, a newspaper published,in the County of Stokes, notifying the Mtid James T. Duncan, to appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Stokes Coun ty, In Danhurv, N. C., ou the 11th day of Feb ruary, 1905. anil answer or demur to the petition iiisani case. And let the said Jan. T. Duncan take notice that if he fails to appear and answer or demur to the petition, on or bv the said llth day of February, 1905, the relief demanded in the petition will be granted. This the 2nd uav of .lan., 1905. M. T. CUILTOJV, C. S. C. N. O. Potree, Atty. for Plff. NOTICE OF SALE. By virtue of a decree of t lie Superior Court of Stokes County, rendered in the Special proceeeding, entitled "./. 11. Cov ington, Admr., of Albert /ioylos, Deed, against A. M. Hoyles, and others," i will sell at public auction to the highest bidder for cash, at the late resilience of tin- said Albert jfovles, Deed., in Stokes County, on Saturday, Fab. 11, lUQS, atone o'clock, I'. 31., two tracts of land belonging t > the said Albert iioyles, in StoAes County, and described as follows, to wit: First tract known as the home place, ot the said Albert lioyles, adjoining the lands of 1). SI. Tuttle, /.ouis .Miller, Tillotson, and others, on the waters of tlie Little Yad A'in, containing 75 acres, more or less, (excepting a small lot cut oil'ol'same to the Trustees of Mount Olive Church), For more particular description of said tract of land, see deeds from Calvin 11. Shore vo Albert Boyles, in the Registers' Otßce of Stokes County, in /Wok No. 27, i'age 558, and Hook No. 21), l'age ;!2, This tract will be sold subject to the Dower right of the widow of Albeit iioyles, which has already been assigned to her. Second tract, containing SO acres more or less, on the wateis of Sizemore Branch, known as the .Steele tract, and being the tract conveyed to Albert Hoyles, by 11". M". King, Trustee, for boundaries of which, see deed in the Registers' Ollice of Stokes Coun ty, iu HOOK NO. ;50, l'age 54. Tills the 2d dav of Jan. 1005. J. 11. COVINGTON, Administrator of Albert Hoyles, Deed. A OTICE OF SALE, By virtue a decree of the Superior Court of Stokes County, rendei-od in the Special proceeding, entitled "Julia F. Lawson and others against John T. Meadows, and oth ers," 1 will sell at public auction, to the highest bidder for cash, at the Court liotise door in the town of Danbury, X. C., on Monday, March the Bill, IWOS, at one o'clock, P. M, a tract of land lying and be ing in the County of .Stokes, adjoining the lauds of P. Olivers, the George Wilson lauds, and others, and bounded as follows, to-wit: "Jieginning at a rock in Oliver's line, tlienee East 35 clis. to a stake iu Oliver's line, South on his line, nine clis. to a rock, his corner, H'est on his and Meadow's line, ID clis. to a maple, .South on Meadow's line, 21 chs. to a white oak, Meadow s corner in Tuttle's line, West 12-1-2 chs. to a white oak, Tuttle's corner, North S-l-2 chs. to a post oak, West 2-1-2 chs. to a black oak, Oliver's corner, North on Oliver's line, 20-1-2 chs. to the beginning, containing 50 0-10 acres, more or less." The above tract of land will be sold as the property of Major Meadows, Deed., for partition among his heirs-at-law. Thi' fhe 24th day of Dec., 1004. N. O. PETIIEE, Commissioner. » K. i mii rritKD :i.;.••• n. o. I sr. i!i - . ii-t-J Bliss ' lii • ti I , n i i-h»ii« an I fiiiil i!, ■: i to S i;ivc ; i*i feci FntUfnctioil." A BOX of Bliss Native g Herbs is a family tloc- f tor always in the house. | Its use prevents and cures g Ri Constipation, Dys- J DLloo pepsia, Kidney and | NATIVE Liver Trouble, Skin | urDRC Diseases, Rlieuma- I rIiLKDj. tjsm a))d many I Blood dr—ses. It is purely I vegetable- contains no min- J eral poison and is pre- ->/>/-» pared in Tablet and Powder fortu. Sold DOSES in One Dollar boxes r | qq with a Guarantee to cure or money back. Our 32 I page Almanac telling how to I treat disease sent 011 request. I MEDICINE MAILED rUO-.ttTLY BV | JOHN H. FAGG, Agent, j Deilar, N. C. I Ti'X a;.on~o o. m.isr. co.. I ECONOMY In t«m- Hood* Bar. saparilla, because " 100 doses one dollar" is peculiar to and true only ol the One True BLOOD Purifier- NOTICE. State of North Car. I in the Superior Court .Stokes County. | Before the Clerk. I the matter of the settlement of the | estate of Geo. 11. Crouse, deed. Notice to non residents. Whereas a proceeding his been instituted inilia Superior Court of Stokes County, tie fore the C'lerk, for a settlement of the estate oi' George 11. Crouse, deed.; and whereas Emily (.'rouse, and her husband, S. B. Crouse, Amanda Spainliower and her husj band, Solomon B. Spainliower, C. E. Spain bower and her husband,J. V. .Spainliower, are interested in the settlement of said estate: and whereas said proceeding has been set for hearing before the Cleric ot the Superior Court of Stokes County, at his office in Danbury, N. C., on Thursday, .March the 2nd, 1 !»().">; ami whereas, it ap pears to the court, upon affidavit tiled that all the parties above named, are non res idents of the State of North Carolina, and cannot, after due diligence, be found there in, and cannot be personally served with notice, and are uece«sary parties to the said proceeding for settlement of the estate of the said Geo' 11. Crouse, deed., and have an interest therein. It is therefore hereby ordered by the Court, that publication of notice lie made for six successive weeks in the Danbury Reporter, a newspaper published in Dan bury, N. C., notifying the said Emily Crouse and her husband, S. B. Crouse, Amanda .Spainliower ami her husband, Solomon B. spainliower, CJ. E. Spainliower and her husband. J. V. Spainliower, to lie. and appear at the office of the Clerk of the Superior court of Stokes County, in Dan bury, N C., on Thursday, itfarch the 2nd, 1005, and see the proceedings in said mat ter, and to take such action therein as they may be advised: and let the said above named non-resident parties take notice, that if they fail to appear at said time and place, the matter will lk> heard ex-paite. as to them. Tins the "th day of Dec., 1004. M- T. CIII/-TUN. C. S. C. N. (>. I'etrec Atty tor Thos. V. Crouse, Ex. State of North Car. lln Superior Court. Stokes County. | T. L. Smith, pill'," Summons for vs relief-before the IMcky Gilbert and her C'lerfc. husband. Demon Gil bert, Bettie Scales and her husband, Robert •Scales, Jfilla Benson and j lier husband—Benson | and LillaTHley. | State of North Carolina. To the SherifTof StoAcs County—greet ing: You ate commanded to summon Lockv Gilbert and her hu-baud, Demon Gil bert, Bettie Scales and her husband, Robt. Scales, ltilla Benson and her lius-band— Benson and Zilla 7'illey, the defendants above named, if they be found within your county, to appear at the office of the C'lerk Superior Court, for the county of Stokes, on the 21st (lay of Jamtaty, 1005 and ans wer the complaint, a copy of which will be deposited in the office ot the, C'lerk of the Superior C ourt of said county within ten days from the date of this summons, and let the defendants take notice that if they fail to answer the said complaint at that time, the plaintiffs will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the complaint. Hereof tail not and of this summons make due return. Given under my hand, this 12th day of December, 1004. M. T. CHIL7ON, C. S. Stokes County. State of North Car. | In the Superior Court ■StoAes County. | Before the Clerk. Order. T. L.Smith, pill'., I vs JLocky Gilbert and I her husband De- | inon Gilbert, Bet- > tie .Scales and her I husband, Robert | Scales, A'illa Ben I son and her bus- | band,—Benson and '. Lilja Tilly, defts. in the above entitled cause it appearing to the court upon affidavit tiled herein that the defendants, i.oekey Gilbert and her husband, Demon Gilbert, Bettie Scales and her husband. Robert Scales, ltilla Benson and her husband—Benson are non-resi dents of the State of North Carolina and after due diligence cannot be fotiud there in and cannot be personally served with aiimmous and are necessary parties to this action the same being to sell for partition among the plaintiff and defendants two tracts of land which aie described speci fically in the petition filed herein by the plaint. 11' one of which contains 2" acres more or less and adjoins the lands of the late Matilda Word, J. I'. Covington and others. The second tract containing two acres more or less and adjoins the lands of James 711 ley and .Vyra Nunn. It being the land of J. I'. Covington conveyed by deed to John 7'illey. It is therefore ordered by the court that publication of summons be made for four successive weeks in the Danbury /fepnrter notifying the said Li ekey Gilbert and her husband, Demon Gi Bert, Bettie Scales and her husband, llobt. Scales, ltilla Benson ami her hus band. —Benson to appeal at the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Stores county in Danbuiy, N. 0., on or before the 21st day of January, 1005 and answer or demur to the petition now on tile in my i flioe with regard to said action and let the said I.ockey Gilbert and her husband, De mon (iilbert. Bettie Scales and her hus band, Hubert Scales, ltilla Benson and lier husband, —Benson take notice that if they fail to ap|iear and answer or demur to the said petition on or before'the 21st day of January, 1005 the relief demanded iu said petition will be granted. This the 15th day of Dec., 1004. M. T. CHILTON, C. S. C. J. D. Humphreys, Atty. NOTICE OF SALE. By virtue of a decree of the Superior Court of Stokes county, rendered in the sjiecial proceeding, entitled "Isaac M. Gor don, adnn. of II". 1). Hawkins, against U T . John //awkins, et al," 1 will expose topub lic sale to the highest bidder, at the cour house door in the town of Danbury, N. C., oil Thursday, the 10th day of January, 1005 at otic o'clock, l\ M., subject to the dower right of the widow of James Hawkins, deed., a one sixth undivided interest in the lands of James Haw kins, deed., owned by W. 1). Hawkins, the whole tract contain ing about 180 acres, more or loss, and be ing the tract known as the home place of the said James Hawkins, deed., on the waters of Snow Creek, or branches thereof, in Snow Crees Township. Terms of sale, one half cash, anil the remainder on a credit of four mouths, with bond and ap proved security for the deferred payments, beat ing six per cent interest from" day of sale. i This the 12th day of December, 1004. ISAAC M. GORDON, admr. of W. D. Hawkins, deed.
The Danbury Reporter (Danbury, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Jan. 6, 1905, edition 1
3
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75