I
:Pp?PVn
r. V
."- ;-, ?
...v V, ; f. (.4 f ;:
' 4 :-' -
- '. t..
1
"1 - V
'..it n--
p .
4
. if-
pph'
',V
r :t!
P-
X
A "..;. :
fmi t.x'V,-.
iiHv':;;!"-:-.-. 'yv I
! V 1: ; Ufr; ..,V. ., ,
mi
! V ! K 0 - . - v
, ; MEMO JR, OF..
yriJE Q UKEJf OF ENGLAND)
,-'1 COKTJNUED. (
After the Exchange of letters betwixt
the Prince and Pxtrcess. the.lattef went
KyreRjMe in Montague -House, Blackheath,
from Uondon. v I here in.
1 3801, she became accidentally acquainted
-with Lady Douglas, (he wife of Sir John
l)nuglas, an"cfBcer io the marine service.
"The-e persons soon became very intimate
with the princess; but in 1804, in conse
qcence of some misunderstanding that
took place, her; royal , highness dismissed
Lndy Douglas frcm her society- This pro
ceeding so exasperated Sir John Douglas
and his lady, that they immediately set to
work to do the Princess all the injury in
their power,' or which revenge could dic
tate. Sir John, in particular, waited upon
the Dukts ofcKent and Sussex, brothers
to the present King, andlnfprmed them
; of some circumstances connected with the
conduct of the 1 Princess; injurious to her
reputation. On investigating the matter,
however, at that period, the royal broth
ers "concluded .not to mention any cf the
circumstanced to the Prince of Wales, as
tbey conceived tfiem to" rest entirely on
the misapprehension of both parties."
Notwithstanding this' resolution on the
part of the two brothers, measures were
taken," by some cne,' to. make thci Prince
acquainted with the stowes which had
been told bout his wife : for in Novem
ber, 3805, ah investigation of the matter
was gone, into-by his authority. In the
. December, following. Lady Douglas and
her husband gave in, she stated,in con sequence
of commands to that purpose
from the Prince rf Wales, a written state-
; ment of facts relative to the language and
behaviour of his wife, and particularly re
lative to the birth of a child, which, she
l-asserted the princess to Have bro't into
the world in 3802. 1 j ; ;
Thus, in possession of ah assertion of
his wifets criminality, ;the Prince lost but
little time in laying the statement before
his father, who on the 20th of May 3806,
issued a warrant to tjhe four Lords, Er
skine; Spencer, Grenyllle and' Ellenbo-
rough, to examine into the matter. The
four Lords having thus got their authori-;
ty for acting, assembled, and called such
persons as they-chose, in order-to exam-
- ine them on oath, touching the matters
alleged against the Princess ;. and when
1 they had gone through the examination,
beginning with those of Lady & Sir John
Dcug1as,;hey-made, agreeable to the war
rant underiwhich they acted, a report
thereof to the King. ' ' ( V
In thisreport, which, was of great
length, they stated as the reviilt of their
enquiries, and' as their perfect convic
tion, that there is ho foundation whatever
for believing. that the child now. with the
Princess is the child of her royal high
ness, or that she was (delivered - of any;
child in the year 1802 ; nor has any thing
nppeared to us which would warrant the
belief that she, was pregnant, in that year,
or at any period ! within the, compass of
! cur enquiries." f Besides the specific
charge of criminality brought r.gainst the'
Princess, cf which, the iepcrt entirely
-cleared her, there1 were others, of anilnor
import, implying improper levity of con
duct in a persona geVif her rank and dig-iiitj-,
respgetingwhich the cpmmrssioners
stated, that, they ' must .be-credited until
theyrshall receive, son 1 e decisive contra-,
-diction ;. and, if true-, are justly entitled
to the most serious consideration."
T!e' Princess, upon being . furnished
with a copy 'of this repcrt, and itsaccom
panyiug. depositions, wroje several letters
to the, King ; jand those letters contained
her defence. against those, minor charges
"vTtTT which the lords commissioners had.
left her tarnished. In the performance of
this task, she had recourse to the legal ad
vice of Mr. Sprncefi TercevaU the late
Chief Justice Gibbs, and the, present Mas
ter of the Holls, Sir Thomas Plomer. In
the letters to which we allude, her royal,
highness; after a moJt able : refutation
ail which had been urged against her, con
cluded with' a prayer 'to -be restcred'to
the presence of his: Majesty at ; Court,
and thus to be cleared in the eyes of the
World., 't '' ..,-'."
.Tht; Kiiig- having the defence, of the
Princess before him, Sc alsoher demands
cf justice at his hands referred her letters
to his Cabint 1 1 Ministers, ' and required
their opinion aid advice as to what-he
.ought to do in the case. -.
The Whigs; who were then in Dower.
felt st mt difficulty .as fo the course which
ihey should pursue; but, at," length, on
.JaauaVy 25, 1807, they came to a resolu?
tion in the form of a Cabinet Minute, ' in,
, which, after adverting to the Mibject sub
mitted ' to their consideration,- they con
cluded by; stating that "they have agreed
humbly to recommend to your Majesty
the draft and rcesjsage, which if approved
by our Majesty they would htmbly sugV
gest yourMaje.siy might send to her Roy
al Highness, through the Lord Chancels
lor. Having before humbly submitted to
. your. Majesty their opinion that the, tacts
cf the case, did not warrant their advising
that any .further steps should be taken
upon itby jour Majesty's, government,
they have not thought, it necessary to ad
vise curf Majesty 'any longer to'declihe
receiving , the , Princess into your royal
presence. But -the; result of the whole
N case does in their judgment, render it in-
dispensable that your Majesty; should; b
a serious admonition, convey to her royal
highness your Majesty expectation that
her. royal highness1 should be-more cir
cumspect.in her future conduct. . v,
.The King, agreeably; to the advice of
bis Cabinet, sent a message to the Prin
cess ' through , the Lord Chancellor kr-
sldhe,'1 containing ,the admonition recom-r
menaeci in 111c mmuic v iw : -
alluded to . The message was sent on
the 28th of January, 1807. The Princess;
ufon receiving it, immediately wrote to
the King, intimatingj to; him, that she
would wait upon him-at Windsor on the
Mondav followine. . The King, the tno-,
ment he received her - letter, wrote back ;
that he preferred receiving her in Lon
don, upon a day subsequent to the ensu
ing week. 1 To this letter the Princess
returned no answer, and waited of course
to hear from toe King.. hus every thing
appeared to be sat jsfactorihjK settled, and
the Princess was about to be restored to
society, when at the request of the Prince
of Wales, all further steps were suspend
ed Jhacis.to say, the receiving of the
Princess by his Majesty. was put off, until
the Princ? shouldbe enabled to submit to
the King a statement, which he proposed
to him upon the papers relating io the
Princesses defence, and consulting with
his own lawyers. ' V ' '
It was now that the adviseis of the
Princess began to cnange the tone of her
letters, and from the plaint'tve to burst
forthinto the indignant, tier royal high-
rness answered the letter of , the 'King,
communicating; the circumstances last al
luded to, on the 32th of Feb. 1807; intima
ting her design to represent to him, in
another letter the various grounds on which
she felt the hardship of her case j Twhich
she done in abetter dated the 16th ;of Feb.
in a most able mhr er,. At the close ot the
letter there was a threat". of an appeal
to the public," unless the Princess should
be speedily received -at Court, and also
allowed some suitable establishment in
some one of the ftoyal Palaces,if not in
Carlton-house; To this letter she receiv
'ed no answer, and, on the 5th ofMarch,'
she wrote aain to the King to say, that
unless her requests were granted, the
Monday, which would have been on the
publication would not be withheld beyond
9th of March, 180r., The publication, or
as it was afterwaids. called,-"The Book,"
didtiot appear :.but in, 15 days' from that
time, Mr. Perceval w r Chancellor of the
Exchequer ! The publication being thus
for a-time, effectually checked, the Whig J
ministry, including the -friends "i of the
;Prince, ' vyent cut of efficeand there was
no'longer any obstacle to the receiving iof
the Princess at Court'; and, accordingly,
on the 21sl of pril, 1807,-minutes were
laid before the King, as a prelude to that
step, in which die council decided as fol
lows . .'' ; ' - " j OV ' ' ;
"After the most! deliberate considera
tion of the evidence which has been Ipro't
before the commissioners, and of the pre
vious examinations, as well as of -the an
swer and observations which have been
submitted ,t ;your Majesty u)ofn them,
they (the cabinet) feel it necessary to.de-
! clare their decided concurrence in the
clear and unanimous opinion of the com
missioners, confirmed by ttiat of all your
Majesty's late confidential servants, that
the two main charges alleged against her
royal highness of pregnancy and delivery
are completely "disapproved ; and they
further submit to your Majesty, their
unanimous opinion that all the other par
ticulars of conduct brought in accusation
against her royal highness'to ,whch the
character of criminality can be ascribed,
are either satisfactorily contradicted, or
rest uponr evidence of such a nature, and
which was given under such circumstan
ces, as render it, in the judgment of your
Majesty's confidential servants,undeserv
ing of credit. Your Majesty's cohfiden-,
tial servants, therefore, concurring in that
part of the opinion of your late .servants,
as stated in their minute of the ' 25th of
Jan. that there is no longer any necessity,
for your Majesty being advised to decline
receiving the. .Princess 'into' your royal
presence, humbly submit to your Majes
ty, that it is essentially necessary, injus
tice to her royal highness, ,and for the
honor and interest of your Majesty's illus
trious family, that her royal high ness the
Princess of Wales, : should be admitted
with. as little delay as possible into your
Majesty's' royaf. presence ; and that she
should be received in a manner due to
her rank and station in your Majesty's
court and . family V , V
Among the ministers sanctioning this
minute were Lord Eldon, Lord Camden,
Lord VVestmoreland, thel Duke of JPort
land, Earl Bathurst Viscount Lord Cas-
tlereagh; Lord Mulgrave, Mr. Canning,
Therie was a separate minute in which
the council declined interfering as" to the
assignment of apartments to the Princes,
in- one ofthe royal palaces, this beinc a
subject purely.of a private dnd domestic
nature ; .-p: ' ' p' V p-.-Thus
ended thejnatter at that time.
The Princess waslestored to her Situa
tion at Court, with a reputation perfectly
unsullied, altho' it'.had been so basely atr
tacked, and to this period it may fairly be
alleeed. that if the death of Vhe. K in had
not taken nlace. thew waW nnthlni- in
tice which could have deprived her royal
hfghnss of all those rights and dignities
Z : , Vw . .0 J 1 1
belonging to the Queen of England. What
may nave since transpireu
character ot her, claims, tuture
ries'tnay,possibiy unfold. ;'Y'A
v...y..
Vlt is nrorjer in this Dlace to state;
that
the Retails respecting " The Delicate In
vestigation,.. which wehave justlconcld
ded, jwe:, ,alth bugH ready for publication,
suddenly withdrawn from the' public. eye.
Three copies only, it is sppposed, escaped
the vigilance of those whose, interest it
wa?" to suppress them' ; and for these the
most extravagant prices " were offeied.--Intense
curiosity was excited only to be
j disappdinted, and the country at large re
! mained ift Ighbrance of the charges which
j had been ' bro't against the Princess, and
! which, in the Absence of truths Were dis-
tortea m tne most snameiui manner.
Up to this time Mr. Peixeyal may
have been .said to have acted in the most,
honorable manner towards his illustrious
client he bad cleare'd her of every impu
tation ; he had restored her to the court ;
he had replaced her in a palace (she ob
tained apartments in. Kehsiiigjon Palace,)
and had done all that her most sanguine j
wishes could have anticipated. From j
his subsequent conduct,ho we ver, it would j
seem that he had acted under a pifferent
feeling. When the Regency caftie to bej
established in the person of the jPrince ;
when the husband sckme to be exalted to
the rank, the splendor and powfe"r of .a
King, the Princess was still left injherfor
mer comparatively obscure and pemiriqus
state.;His6onduct on this occasion-ex'di-ted
at the time a considerable degree of
animadvefsionr 4 He had 'relieved . the
Princess from the consequences pf a foul
calumny ; but her husband beingjnow ex
alted, her non-exaltation operated with
regard to her character,' in neurly the
same way as her exclusion frcm court
had formerly operated. r v ; , ' i 1
' Her royal highness was again exposed
to the malevolent shafts of time serVing,
malice ; but still preserved a Signified
silence1, and would probably have remain
ed in retirement, were not her maternal
feelings deeply wounded by the increasing
restraints .which were dally imposed up
on hep intercourse with her dat ghteri--.
Atjlehgthher indignation burst forth.
She could no longer exist in silen:e under
the reiterated charges which were pre
ferred .against her, and unerth mortifi
cation 1 of , bein g al most exposet I to her
daughter's contempt.' She wrbt" a letter
to the Prince Regent; characterized by'
considerable force Sc eloquence, n which ,
she challenged a full, a publi: disclo
sure of every thing connected with the
investigation of 1805, She emphatically
said In this letter "that while slie did not
venture to intrude her feelings as a tnoth
t r upon his I royal highness's noLice she
mustj be allowed to say, that .in the eyds
of j ah observing and jealous wcrld, this
separation of a daughter from hejr mother
would only admit of one construction a
construction fatal to the mother'p reputa
tion' 1 This letter was sent back to her
unopened, t but it subsequently obtained
publicity. yThe subject underwent repeat
ed -and warm discussion in the public
press at the time, and party feeljngs were
exerted in a considerable degree., Still,
however, nothing was done. r. J.
) At last her royal highness; bf the ad
vice! of hercounsel!ors, on the 2a March,
iSli, transmitted to the Speaker of the.
House of Commons the following letter.
, 1 Montague-house, t Blackkecth,
i v- j- p r : March 1, 1813.
f T he Princess of Wales informs Mr. Speak
er' that she has received from xrd Viscount
Sidmouth, a; copy of a report mad in pui-$u-ance
of the orders of his royal highness ! the
Prince Hegent, by certiin ' members ofhis
Majesty's most honorable privy : council to
whom, it appears, that his royal highness had
been advised to refer certain documents, and
other evidence respecting the 'character and
conduct of her royal hjghness. phe report
is. off such al nature, that her roy d highness
feels persuaded no person can reac it without
being' sensible of the aspersions wl ich it casts
upon hef ; and although it is so vkgue as to
render it impossible: to discover the. tenor of
thecharge ; yet, a her royal highness is con
scion? of no offence, she feels it due to herself
to the illustrious houses to which'shevis con
nected by blood & marriage, and (to the peo
pletamong whom she holds so distinguished
a rank, not to acquiesce for a single moment
in any imputation -affecting: her honor 'tThe
Princess of Wales has hot been permitted to
know on what evidence the , ro em'b ers of the
"privy council proceeded, in their investiga
tion; nor has ier royal highness been allowed
Ho be heard in her own defence She knew
only by common rumor that such an inquiry
had been instituted until the result wa4 com
municated to her in the form--of the lieport
She knows notwhether she Is to ccusiderthe,
members of the privy council by whom her
conduct his been enquired into, as a bodv to
I whom shecOuld be authorised to apply for re
1 dress.br in the(r individual capacily as persons
selected to make the report, on . tier conduct.
The Princess of Wales is therefore compelled
to throw herself oh the wisdom and justice of
Farliaroent;! and she earnesiiy,aeires afull
I v csxigaiion $i uer conuuci uuring tne wnoie
j- period of her residence in this cfjuntryf II er
! Itovil 'Hichness fears no 'scrutinv ' however
: strict, Provided it be eonducted.by impartial
i judges; and in a-fair and open maoner accord
' ihg to law. . It Is her royal highness's wish
,cuici iu uc ijcaicu luiiwon orproveu
! guilty.; fiier royal lngUness de?res that this
may be communicated toithe House-of
j
) j
i f!nmrr.nn' , SV ' i:C -v
1 0 oe ccnciuaea m our next :it
AiSRICULTURE.
The follotaingxrracts'froro ah Address to
' ; the BiassacliU setts Agr i cut turjal Soci ety,
- by JosiAH QpiifCT, are hot local, nor have
e they lost any of iheir interest by being so
y long deferred :.P.P, :P' Py'- V ' '
. Great profits in agriculture can
result 'only from great . im Jroy ertien ts
of I th e-soflf ; eittVi mproyeroeptsi of
the soil can result only frq unrein jt'
ting industry ::'he cnierstud jyf -evi-ry
fanner should bet "what isfuspful
and what is usetess expence in relation
j tohisurt. The discrimination between
er'iprospefity.v Te first shouldbe
i n cu rred with" a freedom little short. of
profusion.' The 1 ast shoul d,be sfiiii h -riedas
yie sailor shuns the rocks where
are sjeen the . wrecks of the hopes of
preceding man hers. U p.? ::p'yp
In. this art, f and almost in ,this: art
alone, itis the liberal hand that male -eth
rich. P-pP- P-yp-p :x "y ' 'P
Liberality in providing utensits is,
the .saying both of time, and ( labor,
The more perfect his instruments, the
more profitable are they. ; :V !
So also is it with his working cattle
and t stockI. Th& most perfect in theft
kindsVthe mo'st profitable. '
Liberality jn good barns and warm
sheltersV ' is i the source -of heal th
strength and comfort to animals', cau-.
ses them to -th rive on less' food, and 4
'secures from damage all sorts or crops.
' v Liberalitr alsWin the provision if
joooq foraomestip ammais is me source
of flesh, muscleand manure ':''$$Mt
! uiDeiauty to tne eann, vn fseeu.
culture, ahd;COmppst, is'theybue of'
its bounty. vV v P't , Py u$-fk.
1 nusic is in;agricuiiure, asf in eve
ry part of creation i a wise and pater-
ual 'Providence hsrt inseparably con
necieupur fluty vviunsr nappiness.
""Itfultivating.TOeea
tibn -of man's successJis his industry
upon it. . -.yp-;.?V:t'. I v"'
: In raising domestic animals, ' the
condition pf his jsudces iskjindness
and behevolence to them f ? f ;
P In making the product! venessMf tne
earth depend upon the diligenceand
w i sd 0 m . n f th e cu I ti vatb r, 1 th efUni ver
sa! Father has inseparably connected
the - fertility of his creation with the
strongest intellectual inducemehts,&
the .hiirhest moral motives.
In putting the brutal : world tinder
his dominion, ' he has placed the hap
pi ness of which their natuire is suscep
tible, under the strong cuarantee of
strong
man s interest. ,. y'.- ' 'ip , ' :v
' Instead,; therefore of, repining at
his lot,; let the cultivator of the ground
consider his as among th e highest an d
happiest of all human destinies, since
in relation to the earth, , he is the' in
strument of Heaven's bounty $ and in
relation to , the inferior orders of cre
ation, the Almoner of Providence. P:
C OMMERCE & "MANUFACTUCE3
j. ": v j ' " i --. " i-'$PP
There is little doubt that a certain
class of our merchants are determined.
as far as , they can accomplish iti to
array the commerce againstthe manu
factures of tbe, country and as both
ciaim an lueniiiy oiinieresi wun agri
culture, ,our farmers as umpires will
have to d ecid e' the qu esti on between
them " The prtijipety. of creating' an
invidious, distto
branches of natiimal industry whch
are mutually dependant on each other,
and puglit to form but one interest,1 we
will hot now discuss 5 neither will we
question; thb; patriotism whichs pver
looks the true and permanent inter
ests of tin country in its apprehension
of temporary Ioss-but . confine our
selves, to expressing?some doubts of
the policy of the measure in reference
to its probable! effects on those very
commercial I interests it is meant, to
promoteIfour merchants act in open
hostility ' to' our ' manufactures, they
will "of coirrse be met with a' similar
feeling, and in the stngglev betweenl
rtnemj tne common interests r w 1 1 1 pro
I bably. be lost sight of, and the predor
minance 01 tile one witi proDaDiyDe
f attended with the', unnecessary sacrir
fice of the other.' It is not tor the pub
lic good,1 nr for the interest of either',
that commerce should be sacrificed to
manufactures 5 lot that ,theyprsperity;
of our ; maine should be buil t: on the
ruin of 6u
it necessary i A propert encourage
ment may be extended to our manu
factures without affecting V our com
merce, and our merchants may find it
-ininrr psst. aiwp annrfihfnd it will be
PKP
more tot their benefit, to modify ?thix
i
more easilyi'thaba . victprv. iOurvma . 4
niifactqjrefe;-
to overpower the;claimj5vbf tiljeir '.5ppdi..;:" . r
ents, as tlieyare glead bjchsider "
them. ; A compromise may tic effected pi P :. p.
iterest : jthey have bepomb j irtfa very; -
cuusiuerauie uecree 1 lueittiueu : w in t v ,
feelings pf hajibnat pride anjd Ihflepen..5;-' .'p. ;.
dehce, and. are believed byJmany.to bej?. P ,5, j' ,. "
csscjiiiai lu.mc pi yspciHjr aim t jjuwec
of ie;ountry,r It ouglit tp;be recpl- I
Iectedtht; wiiaye avery wtensiy ,
population who itrejuhder the influence
of :vtbe'9f ieelihgs,;ahd whb are too re-5 f
uiute iroui uie ,-uenejiis ui commerce
to feel jk ny con nex ion 1 tH.Jpf. j n te r ' .
est tin :;'ts prosperity -j a nbVii t ought to
befell) iweij?hedWhethe
while.to! establish a distinction which
maagairi cairiorth that hostility Xo
our I cbimerc wbich; t has ittfbrmer
casesibeea
ihterests. These arestifigestionsof, V h
pruaence wiii( sensipi. - j
tenance the actS'Ot the.selnsh and irn.- . ' -rp I ;
nroVidnt;4 mhvJ wlith vhose Hhferta S: ' I
c i . " s-vi'ii -if. i' h .-.' T"..;l
their own areidenf IfieidjjyV K nier.
VALUABLE REAL 'P
-PROPERTY tOR, S ALE. ; . :
mflB Subsqriber i intending, to; leave this
Xj. ,cpupQr, , oifers ;Tor' lalet, sthat valitabla '
Plantation velt known hy the name o,f. Pko
pect Haxj Bladen cbunty,. formerly", owned '
byj ErievLallerstet, K?ij: situated on the ' ;
west side of . Jhe north west branch of Cape V
earTiyjerihetJeen miles below Fay etteri lie
and the same ditariceboy e Eti zabeth town.- - i
containiner in all about two thousand Acres.
Ybis seat'irf goodness o soiUsalubrityr.elei
gance of situation anduildings is inferior td ,
feminthetateitewVi '
Houses,! twb Kitefiehs twortBarht .jStablej V "
Carriig HoueB)ack a Saw;. v ,
Mill at a shrtldistfnce ;,from the: rjy er; theO " ;
creek: affotdingtwo thill seats besides, being -about
threp thiles from &gwamp? Vhich
water; may be brought by a ditchto supply ;
anymachmeythatmbeestablhe l-V
. Also, absuK 28VNEGUOES;Vof j', different
sexes' aijft geshic)i?ma be'spU with the; ; tV
soil and its fcliltttrc r' -The :nnrtfhncr'rifiv hf'
acebmmodated with tattle, Hojgs Horses and
all the Utensils used on thf said pIantktion
xVith Corn, Fodder, HayV & also with '.House
hold land Kitchen. 'Furniture' f,;j p p
- jor terms,t which , will be, made atcommp
dating to the purchaser, apply at the. place, .
r -j
P.
TAR BE.
October 28
y). sotf 'v
STATE OF NORTH-CAHOLINA, :
liicmond Superior Court of Law, "
March Term,l18io, ' :
John Wall,
Cfigi
Attachnientr
not an inhabitant of this Statebrtiered! that
publication be made in the Raleigh-Kecrister
for siiweeks' successively; j that unless the
Caidi Defendant appei.te'nek'ieria 'or-''
tnis uourt, to le held tor said GotmtyV ;the '
Sd Monday of September' nejrt,; and; enters
hisplea &q final Judgment will be rendered H '
against hini : ; ? ;P j -f,:p, ..
; Witness,1 Bf II. CovingtonJ Clerk of said
Court, at office the 10th July, A. Dl ltf20. v
gl-75 i s B.. C()VKGTON ClC. r
State of jSoRTii-CAnoLiKA. j
; Mecklenburg Cdiinlytp -P.
y ,
. ;"
i Superior
I of Law ' M'Term 18?0. v ' ?
L ? Petition for Divorce and:
Barbara Johnson.
John Johnson PrU: . rtKfW:
Alimony.' -
XT app earing to the satisfaction of the Court;
that Jghn Johnson the defendant, cannot
be found in this State Ordered that publiv
cation be made for three months ) irk the Stai
and j Raleigh .Register, that) unless, the said ;
defendant appear, at the, next term of said . '
Court,! to be held at the Courthottse-in Char- 't'
lott e, on the sixth Monday after the . fourth, a
Monday 'of September jnext,1aliid enter his
pleas, M" anyhe has, k decree and judgment
ciucrcu up gainsi nim accoraing a,
the prayer of the petitionerj 5 ' , yh
p: r CEO. Gil VHAM, c s. c. t. '
July? 4, 1820 ' ',X(U 88'm';-'"5;-''
TATEyOPNpRTH-CAhoLINA ' ! ' .
Superior Court of Law. Mav Tenn. 1820
tf;th itjiiwftt. 1' vpyi;l ' LI ' i ' -J V
j "TP? f Petition Tot
hvorce an
Iryin Baggett. . j
.Alimony;
IT appearing to the satisfacti
that: Iryin Baggett, the t
tio:n ofthe Court, i
fen.dan, ckn-1
not i be found m this btate-fOrdered Uat
publication he made for three months na.ihe
Star d Raleigh tRegtster that, unless Ihe
said detendant appear; at tne next term; 01
said Court, to be held at the Courthouse 1 in
Charlotte, on the sixth VlQday ; after Ui e j-'
fourth Monday of September.ftext, and enter
nispneas, ii any uc ia,; u.?c,re ana juatl yyp.
ment will be entered up agamit him accord'
inglto the prayer ofthe petitioner.
P 4 v '. Y' GEO.-dltAHMi c s'
oJuljy4,1820 t ;, f ; ; 88 3
C.
3m
''-"Y.2hd Blackstone's Commentaries has
JltJJ been out j of my Liibri ry for several
yearsl I wdl tbk the bprrpwer to return
. : . ir ..... V
IT ; app earing to thV satisfaction of the
Court, that tbeiiefendant! in this suif'i9
r ..
v. . ; : .
P
'
P
i 1 :
;7. W
it
VI
I;
1' -
il.
P
r:
;3
:: ..V'M I
-r; f t
4 . t-f
" y J.-
P.: t
t: .P.
' ;,-. i
' .,yP, j
P' V