f t J I 1 N I Khz nnilp i Was ilea Jw zi sixty-ninth year of editorial freedom; 'unhampered by restrictions from either the administration or the student body. The Daily TaiLHeel ix ;? o the Publications Board of the University of North Carolina. ' All editorials appearing in The Daily Tar Heel are Jhe personal expressions of the editor, unless otherwise credited; they are nt necessarily representative of feeling on the staff. ;. v.... BLANCHARD September 27, 19G1 Tel: 942-2336 Vol." LXIX, No. 8 Carolina's Fuiture Calmly unaware of the impor tance of the issue, Carolina students are nestled with carefree ease m the center of activity concerning the coming bond issue. The nearly six million dollars con tingent -on the eight items involy irig the University can make . or break her future. If these issues jpasswe can keep abreast; if they are defeated the future is uncertain. Passage is far from a sure thing. The people or North Carolina have yet to be made completely aware of a multitude of facts concerning the issue. Clarification of the points will help to insure passage, arid the stu dents at Carolina must carry the weight of explaining them. There are many misconceptions that must be clarified and explain ed to point up the validity of eyery' item on the proposed issue. Caro-t lma must snow its heed, arid there is no better, way to show this need, than through the students f 6r vvnom the University exists. Over and over again it must , be explained that passage will not . mean an . in crease in taxes. No one can better explain this to parents than their sons and daughters at Carolina." Letters must be written; -representatives contacted, confidence built. We must explain and explain. And: when the explanation seems clear, we must explain again. '.The issue riiust be stripped of partisan overtones, the worth of the items on the proposal pointed out to Democrats and Republicans alike; ". Every item, particularly those concerning education, were includ ed because of a definite need. This must be emphasized. , President Friday, Chancellor Ay cock and other officials are working with strength orn of intense dedi cation to put the University's needs before the eye of the public. But their strength and hard work are almost; iriMfecfual in the area wnere ; effectiveness mast exist: with' the people' of North Carolina who will vote yes or no on Caro lina's future. The"- prime resporisibilTty on this front belongs to the student. Every in-state student represents aff irma tfve Votes "if he or she Will but ask his parents tti support the sale of fronds when the votes conies in Nov ember.' Yet, the bulk of us show only a passing' interest, a faintly felt hope that "it win pass." ; Jri . the' coming, weeks,, students will be asked to put forth at least a minimum effort .toward selling the University; , i We cannot fail to respond. ' Guest Editorial Britain's Changing Attitude , A mass protest against nuclear arms in Londonts Parliament Square conceivably might pick-up more participants now that the United States" has" resumed testing.' ' i But neither such an eventuality, nor. the cries against the jailing of Bertrarid' Russet, the 89-yeaf;-oIo! philosopher and anti-nuclear leader for failing to keep the pea'ce, should mislead us as to Britfeh opinion. ; ; There has been considerable agi tation against our stationing of -P6-la'ris-anried subriiarines in Scotlanfl arid there will be soirie oppositioiij to our resumption of testing. But tnere is an evident swing away from such an attitude undoubtedly contributed to by Russia's unilateral resumption. 'Significantly, the British F.oreign Office was sending a message supp porting our resumption of tests be fore most Americans even knew that, we had done so. X- - - - - - - - . ; , .But an even more meaningful in dicatiotf 6f the change in outlook came in tfe recent annual British Trade . Unions . Ctorifeerice. ILast year, Labor Party Leader Hugh t<skitt wits soundly trounced in votes, passing resolutioris calling for banning the A-boriib and keeping tfie ' Polaris subs out of British waters. This year, it was just the reverse, ' r. .; - . ; , .. A year ago, the Labor Party was so split on the issue th'at it seemed rinlikely ever to be a potent force in the country. But now Mr. Gaitskill $a?. Drought trie .party back to gether, and while it might not un seat, ithe Conservatives1 at the next election,- it has chances that are im proving. 1 Vhat the neutrals, so-called, will besaymg about our new tests is a different matter., After all, though, after Belgrade, - does it really mat ter? - ; St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times 1 m I m P n I 1 WAYNE KING - - Editor --i- , Mabcaret Aim RmrMEa , Associate .Editor Jim CLorrELTtai Assistant to, the Editor .' - Bill - Hobss i J Managing Editors . .. Lloyd Little Executive News Editor , Srzn Vaugki? ..'I. Hews Editor Nancy Bahr, Linda Chavtta . . . Feature Editors Barry W. Lloyd. J5ports Editor ' TIM BURNETT Business Manager Mike Mathers Advertising Manager The atly Tab IIeei. Is published daily, excen. Monday, examination periods and vacations. It Is entered as second class matter in the. post office in Chapel Hill, N. C pursuant with, the act of March 8, 1870. Subscription rates: $4.50 per jsemester. $3 per: year. . The Daily Tar Heel is a subscriber to Che ITnited Press International n4 utilizes the services of the News-Bu reau of the University, of. North Caro-lina- -bit Pmblished by the Chapel Kill Pub lishing Co., Chapel Hill. N.'C " it m n m I II 1 m n Belatedly, the Daily, Tar Heel would like to recognize the members of this year's Orientation Commit tee. Orientation , this year , was a prodigious job well doneand stands as a firm ..argument against any plans to curtail it in the future; The suggestion that the program would Dehefit frbiri an jiidded Em phasis on the academic side of CS Iina' living is a suggestion well ta-f efo: But a change in approach U riot difficult to efttect wheri partrciplants worl s deKgehtly and , effectively as 'Hid, tne cunsetqrs this year. "A "vote of th'a&k' is djiliacb. ?f them as well as to the committee. A paffiy Still JL A Not Typical ' Madison, Wise. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Cam pus: " . .This is to. inform you that the National Student ; Association (NSA) does not represent you, despite what you have been told. Its pronounce ments and stands on issues do not reflect your views and opinions. The people who come to the Congresses, where NSA policy i formed, are not representatives of their student body. The five national officers and ten staff men who "execute" policy from NSA's rickety four-story building in Philadelphia likewise do not repre sent you. In short, although NSA is a con federation of student governments with a collective attendance of 1.3 million students, it is NOT typical. It does not represent you. And it's all your fault, you apathetic bums, you; ; r .. (s) Steven Roberts, Editor The Harvard Crimson Carey McWilliams, Jr. Professor of Government Oberlin College THE ABOVE LETTER as a let teris a phony. It does not exist, except as here imagined. But its contents are not phony; its contents are a purely arbitrary compilation o fsome of the views of Roberts and McJVilliams as they appear stated and implied in an article by them entitled "Student Leaders and Cam pus Apathy," which appears in The Nation of Sept 16. The article is an incisive evalua tion of what NSA is and is not, where NSA has been and where it is going, and of what Conservation is and is not. If you have the time, its two-and-a-half pages merit a first-iand reading. Besides those stated and implied views included in the imaginary let ter here are some particularly perti nent excerpts: ; "Galloping apathy still dominates most American college students . . . (so) . . . NSA IS NOT typical. It is an elite of interested students, awak ening to a world they did not make, but world they want to change. This has not always been so. , "FOR MOST OF its fourteen-year history, NSA devoted itself to the issues which concerned its member student governments: college park ing, home-coming dances, women's hours, etc. It did so largely from necessity, because its claims to legi timacy rested on these student gov ernments, which had virtually com plete freedom to withdraw their col leges from NSA when dissatisfied with its policies. "Contemporary collegiate student governments are, to put it mildly, a poor vehicle for transforming politi cal awareness. They reflect the de sire of the college administrator to Most Americans in viewing the overall world situation are now be ginning to realize that the U. S. may be forced to choose between surrender and war. Since the end of World War II we have seen an increasing hostility on the part of the U.S.S.R. America and her allies have tried to open avenues of peace between Russia and the U.S. but ail attempts have seemed to end in futility. If there can be no accommodation be ween ourselves and the Communists, then the choice of war or surrender is inevitable. There is no comfort for the con cerned in the fact that the surrender may be either gradual or subtle, for in world politics (contrary to popu lar U. S. opinion) it is not "how you play the game, but whether you win or lose." The stakes of the game are survival, and it is on this fundamental issue of survival that the choice of war or surrender will rest. r THE KREMLIN may be hoping that the choice will be one of gradu al, subtle and painless surrender. But if Mr. Krushchev were to ex- "avoid difficulties" at all costs by eliminating the student from ail areas of controversy -which . might "'re flect on the university." (Note: The reference is to Universities" in general- and experience has shown is most inaccurate where UNC is concerned.) "There is a close interaction be tween student . government under these conditions and student apathy. The banality , of student politics re pels, the student; the absence of student criticism and interest leaves student governments in the hands of those who find playtime bureau cracy and homiletics about alma mater to be congenial pursuits. . '- "IT WAS THESE GOVERNMENTS that sent delegates to the" NSA Con gress; and the delegates annually rose in" revolt against whatever broader policies had ben pursued by national officers, threatening to withdraw or to form rival associa tions. , "Under such circumstances, even the most far-sighted national officer was likely to develop an ethic of cautious prudence and "responsibili ty. This led to endless compromises, and a pandering to the uninspired interests of campus political re gimes. "Tne toP stau? of NSA realized that it was not. truly representative. Consequently,' if tried even harder to please, and largely submerged any trace of boldness or imagination it had in the silence of the times a silence punctuated only occasion ally by a boisterous football cheer or a shrill female scream. "THE LAST TWO years have seen an already much-discussed "awaken ing of the silent generation. The sit-ins in the South, sympathy 'pic kets and selective buying in the North, protests against the House Committee on Un-American Activi ties and compulsory ROTC, the cam paign for repeal of the loyalty oath and disclaimer affidavit in the Na tional Defense Education Act, and enthusiastic support for the Peace Corps all came in a rush. "There was definitely a stirring, a reawakening interest. In addition to the protest, a rash of campus political parties . . . sprang up. So did a number of new magazines 13 Reflections m II , With the current craze of fall-out shelters .sweeping the country, the old cliche, "He who goes, lowest; builds safest," becomes all too true. "flic Question il, Would It Be Proper For Us To Tate Sides?" r 7 NORMAN & SMITH G&Mes? May devoted? to political thought . . . "NSA mirrored the change, but not because it had become repre sentative of the American student (the large majority of American stu dents remain unaware and uncon cerned). There was, however, a grow, ing interest among the leaders who actually are NSA and form its policy at the annual Congress. For the first time, the association took stands on such issues as HUAC, the Peace Corps, Algeria, Cuba and nuclear testing. "THE STIMULATION of the unique student protests aroused NSA to take positive stands on im portant questions, but in doing so it was acting not as the National Student Association, but as a consci ous group of student leaders, far removed from the sentiments of their campuses and constituency. "The value to . those who have participated has ben immense, but they are few. NSA has almost com pletely failed to transport the initial enthusiasm of the "movement" back to the campus, largely because of the understandable concern of ideal ists for the moral content of issues rather than the structure of social and educational power or the day--to-day realities of student life. "This is where NSA stood as the fourteenth National Student Congress began (in Madison, Wise.) The dif ference this year was the conserva tive "challenge," which forced NSA leaders to take a long look at the association." NSA's newly-elected president, Ed Garvey, "emphasized the need for bringing the experience of a Con gressthe deliberations and, most important, the defense of an ideal in the face of strong opposition to all students. This can only be done, he said, 'by structuring the Congress so that delegates won't leave and forget what has happened, but will go back to their campuses, fight for the stands they have tak en,' and translate policy into specific programs.' "SYMBOLIC OF NSA's renewed interest in educational problems was ' a resolution condemning the theory of in loco parentis as restrictive to trie full intellecual and social growth of the 'student: This doctrine, which gives the college legal authority to act as a "parent," forces the student into a dependent relationship with the school, rather than the beneficial mutual give and take of an intel lectual community. "NSA, after years of frustration, has finally emerged as a voice, if not of the American student, then of the American student leader. The question is now whether it can trans late the enthusiasm of a few into a device for awakening the still "sil ent" American college community." Be War DTK Forum amine the opinions of the youth of this country today, I believe he would find a substantial tide of feel ing: that if we can obtain the peace which we seek and to which our pol icy is dedicated, then we must fight; There is a gnawing fear that we may lose our basic rights in Berlin, tha( the Communist offensive will continue agfression in South East Asia, and the U.N; will become not an instrument of peace, but a kind of international discussion group or forum. EVEN THE MOST dedicated lib eral must be frustrated at the So viet's refusal to end nuclear testing and rearmament. But the frustration goes much deeper to the belief that the reaching of a peace between East and West is futile. It is from this futility and this bitter realization that one turns toward a new and fresh intellectual force which holds' that there must be no accommoda tion with the Soviets. If Mr. Khrushchev or anyone un derestimates this undercurrent of opinion, he may find that the U. S. has found the door to peace closed, and only the door to war or surrend er open. 'There are many Americans who no doubt believe surrender a better alternative to wan, but there are far more who will never permit the "grandchildren to live under com munism." If the choice must be made, then it will be war. elaxe d Psychological State' Aliead For Schoolroom Johnny KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (UPD The schoolroom of the future will create in Johnny a "relaxed psychological condition" that will turn his mind to long divsioh instead of to the old swimming hole. "Schools today are being design ed from the human standpoint," Dr. John W. Gilliland, University of Tennessee education professor, said today. "We are trying to construct them to bring out the best in peo ple." : Gilliland is director " of the uni versity's school, planning laboratory. The laboratory was set up three years ago to help southeastern U. S. school systems get the most for their money n ..building construction, in structional ids and equipment and school sites. Gilliland calls them "working school buildings." THE SCHOOL of the future "the emerging school program" will be a compact, air-conditioned, square shaped building, circling a recrea tion area, Gilliland said. The class rooms will be in warm colors, will have more comfortable furniture and will be flexible in size because of sturdy, sliding, sound-proof partitions. Liberal use will be made of carpet ing to cut distracting noise and cre ate a "more relaxed psychological condition, conducive to learning." . "Now, we're paying more atten tion to what the building itself does to people, psychologically," he said. The laboratory, . which.makes.its services available free, although most systems contribute to the grant awarding organization, presently has or is near agreement on projects in Atlanta and Fulton County, Ga., Har lan, Ky., and Kingsport, Alcoa, Greenville Rockford and Chattanoo ga, Tennessee. ALABAMA'S AUBURN University provides much of the enginering and architectural advice. The laboratory coordinates local efforts "to de fine a program which looks ahead, then interpret the program while encouraging new trends." In one county,. Gilliland estimates the laboratory's suggestions saved about $25,000 for -a system, .which .bad,, three new.,schools constructed. Dear Sir: Tonight, when I returned to my room, I saw posted on the door of the "Ram's Room" in Cobb Dormi tory, a sign which read as follows : " 'Ram's Room Temporarily clos ed due to the administration's (South Building) lack of informed imagina tion and confidence in the Student Government." The sign bore the signature of the president of Cobb Dormitory, Richard Burrows. I was a little confused to say the least, for when I came to the Uni versity two weeks ago as a fresh man for orientation, I was lectured enumerable times on how much faith the administration puts in the stu dents,' i.e. the Honor System, the Honor Council, and the Student Gov ernment. I would like to know then, if the administration places so much faith into the hands of the students, why this administration is now step ping into the bounds of the Student Government. James L. Rossman 1 Hi m 1 II About Letters The Daily Tar neel invites readers to use it for expres sions of opinion on current topics regardless of viewpoint. Letters must be signed, con tain a verifiable address, and be free of libelous material. Brevity and legibility in crease the chance, of publica tion. Lengthy letters may fee edited or omitted. Absolutely none, will be returned. m