.Volume 72, Number 115
5fly latlg afar ?f
71 Years of Editorial Freedom
Published daily except Mondays, examinations periods and vacations, throaghoat the aca
demic year by the Publications Board of the University of North Carolina. Printed by the
Chapel Hill Publishing Company, Inc., 501 West Franklin Street, Chapel Hill, N. C.
'Arms And
This Spring the Carolina Symposium
will bring many speakers of great sta
ture to the campus to discuss some of
the most vital issues facing our society
and the individual. Is the development
of a "warfare-welfare state" destroy
ing our traditional concepts of individ
ual freedom and action? What are the
changing values of our society and what
are the changing values of the individ
ual? Can the civilian government main
tain control over a mammouth, well es
tablished military complex?
These questions are of moment in
v our rapidly changing society, and this
year's symposium promises to be one
of the most productive and exciting ven
tures into this realm that has yet been
. held. But the subject is complicated,
Akers Ignores Change Of Clothes
Not only does Dick Akers consider
. all civil rights demonstrators unwash
ed and badly dressed, he has officially
. refused to recognize the name change
of the Inter-Dormitory Council to the
. Men's Residence Council.
. Akers, Student Body treasurer, told
. MRC President Gerry Good that he
. would enter the MRC's appropriation
. for next year under, the IDC in his bud
. get proposal. He told Good that he would
. not recognize the name change made
. last semester.
Akers is the same gentleman who
wrote us a letter earlier this spring
The First Gut Shot: Are More To Come?
Raleigh News and Observer
Wherever the original blame may lie,
they are manufacturing ill-will for
North Carolina in the trial of the pro
fessors in the Orange County Superior
Court in Hillsboro.
Already in important centers in the
North shock and surprise has been reg
istered as a result of the 60-day sen
tence given a young Duke math teach
er for joining a group including Negroes
peaceably seeking service at a Chapel
Hill cafe. Perhaps, though we'll have to
wait for the result of his appeal to find
out, he violated valid law. He may have
been indiscreet. Certainly his action
was unpopular with some. But it cannot
be forgotten that many will share his
own feeling that he acted in terms of
his conscience for what he believed was
equality under law in his country.
The 60-day sentence for trespass at a
public cafe will seem vindictive to many
people elsewhere. And already the
words, "Chapel Hill which once seem
ed a term for enlightenment, are now
being bandied about as words in the
company of Oxford, Mississippi, and Al
bany, Georgia.
The protestors and demonstrators may
be responsible for this. So may some
Gary Blanchard, Dave Ethridge
Co-Editors
Managing Editor
Associate Editor
News Editors
Copy Editor
Sports Editor .
Asst. Sports Editor
.
Photo Editor
Reporters :
Kerry Sipe, Administration
Jeff Dick, Municipal
John Greenbacker, Student Government
Editorial Assistants!
Shirley Travis Nancy McCracken
Staff Artists:
Chip Barnard
Science Editor . Mat Friedman
Reviews '. Hertry Melnnis
Business Manager Art Pearce
Advertising Manager -
Asst. Business Mgr.
Asst. Advertising Mgr.
Sales .
Circulation Manager
Subscription Manager
The Man'; A Vital Question
of those who stand stubborn in chang
ing times. The word already has been
spread in Chapel Hill and the nation,
too, that the wife of the proprietor of
one segregated cafe stood above a floor
ed demonstrator and urinated upon him
Such action in supposed defense of
Southern customs gives a sickening im
presson of some of those who assume
to defend old ways in Chapel Hill.
Of course, some of the demonstrators
have gone to idiotic extremes, though,
so far as is known, none to such inde
cent extremes. It is clear, however, that
there are extremists on the side of cus
tom as well as change in Chapel Hill.
And the unusually severe punishment
of a young Duke professor who made
his demonstration in orderly fashion
gives the impression that in the Chapel
Hill area the scales of justice are sag
ging on the side of one group of ex
tremists against others who seem ex
tremists, too.
The University, the development of
the Research Triangle, the State's pres
tige are innocent bystanders in this sit
uation but they could be the chief vic
tims, also.
A Double Honor
UNC Law School senior George C.
Cochran has brought new and mean
ingful honor to Carolina in distinguish
ing himself to the extent that he has
been awarded a coveted clerkship to the
U- S. Supreme Court.
This is believed to be the first time
that a graduating student in any North
Carolina law school has ever been se
lected for such an appointment. His
torically the appointments, whose chief
criteria is scholastic achievement, have
gone to students at institutons such as
Harvard, Yale, Notre Dame and the
Unversity of California at Berkeley.
And even then, only 19 law clerks are
appointed, so being selected identifies
you as the absolute cream of the crop.
George bad already given great evi
dence of being that anyway, but this
appointment removes all doubt.
We wish him luck in his new position.
And we wish Carolina luck in continu
ing to produce scholars of such estim
able rank.
Fred Seely-
Hugh Stevens
Mickey Blackwell
Peter Wales
Linda Riggs
John Montague
Larry Tarlton
Jim Wallace
Fred McConnel
Sally Rowlings
Woody Sobol
Frank Potter
Dick Baddour
Bob Vanderberry
John Evans
Bob Holland
Thursday, March 12, 1964
Entered as 2nd class matter at the Post
Office in Chapel Hill, N. C pcrscant to
Act of March , 1870.
Subscription rates: (4.53 per femes ter;
$8 per year.
and for each student to get the most
out of it, it will be necessary for him
to prepare and study beforehand.
This month discussions are being
held with some of the outstanding facul
ty members, on this year's subject,
"Arms and the Man". These discussions
are being held in fraternities, sororities
and dormitories, and will provide an
excellent opportunity to engage in real
interchange with some of the better
faculty members an opportunity that
presents itself all too rarely in this
University.
We urge all students who plan to at
tend the symposium to attend as many
of these preparatory discussions as pos
sible. Watch for announcements of the
discussions in the DTH, and go.
complaining about the dress of the
average civil rights demonstrator, say
ing that one could always judge a man
by his clothes.
However, he refuses to acknowledge
the attempted clothes change of the
MRC (from IDC).
Trite as Akers' action may be, we are
compelled to point it up and observe
his absurd bigotry.
We would readily and happily pass
him by were he not in such an impor
tant position, reflecting upon all of
Student Government and the students
themselves.
Our Spy
'Onward And
Upivard . . .5
By FRANK CKOWTHEE
DTH Spy
WASHINGTON The time
iias passed when I am able to
remain silent about certain
events in Chapel Hill. One may
preserve one's restraint only
with carefully nurtured disci
pline, but my near apoplectic
state of the moment and my in
stinctively competitive nature
impel me to protest most vigor
ously. I refer, of course, to the re
cent public conflagration of
Kite Flying in Chapel Hill.
Were I not of reasonable
marrow, my indignation would
burst forth with a more dys
peptic ferocity. But one adapts
oneself to a temperate mien in
middle age (where J find my
self at 31, after an agonizing
reappraisal of things temporal,
and when weighed against the
lamentable child minds of the
Republic).
There were but few things
held sacred by my nether
world contemporaries, and Kite'
Flying was supreme among
them. It was something we
cherished in reserve, a sepa
rate peace, if you will, where
in life's patent absurdities were
sheeted into the solace of a
breeze.
This latest display of pub
lic defilement, however, egged
on by the once good offices of
the Daily Tar Heel and abet
ted by one Joel Fleishman
(who now must be branded a
traitor to my generation for
actually having participated,
with seeming impunity, in such
debacle), has cast a dank
shadow of aspersion on Kite
Flying as a Way of Life.
Gentlemen, I must confess
to being appalled. You have
made an egregious error in so
vulgarizing a traditional pro
fession. The eternal curse of
Ben Franklin upon all your
houses.
The very thought of a pub
lic display! Crass publicity!
Beauty queens! Ill-begot and
maligned rules and regimenta
tions! Why, one is almost dis
posed to consider your actions
less than innocent perpetra
tions of a sub rosa communist
plot,- yet another mad en
croachment of aristocratic
pleasures. It also smacks of the
'those-that-think-young' set.
Well, well, I go on, don't I?
In the final analysis to invoke
a favorite campus catch-phrase),
no ex post facto revulsion is of
any purtenance. Behold, the
thing is done, and neither God
nor Barry Goldwater may re
voke it. So be it.
Within the limits of security
imposed upon me by sacred
rite and considerable letting of
blood, I am at liberty to re
veal that I find myself among
the charter members of the St.
Thomas Society of Kite Flying
Fellows (with Ladies in Wait
ing), duly chartered by the Diet
of Cassowary (vide, Windward
Islands Concordat of 1867)
and, pity sake, don't ask me
what an Australian bird was
doing in the Caribbean. As a
Founding Flying Father of said
society, I do herewith, herein
and whereas tender, but with
out extending diplomatic recog
nition, an invitation to engage
in mortal combat with our
happy few. In that your shab
by contingent reeks of ama
teur standing, this engagement
will be entered into on the
home estate of the ranking
champions, that is, St. Thomas
in the American Virgin Islands,
at a date mutually convenient
but under rules stipulated
under the aforementioned Con
cordat. If you must persist in your
current endeavors, bear the
following in mind.
No machine-made kites are
permissible. They must be
made by hand or imported.
(Japanese kites are out, but
German kites, which attack and
cut down other kites, are most
desirable don't you just love
the inventive German mind?)
It is required that nothing
other than Martinis be par
taken while you are in action
one may lose more kites that
way, but then who the hell
cares after the first pitcher?
Night flying is very fashion
able. You may either paint
your kite with luminous mix
tures, or hang a small lantern
on the tail. Westinghouse
makes an excellent fine wire
for heavy kites, and it is most
effective in bringing down
small planes.
Chinese kites are not the
best flyers, but they are often
decorated with marvelously
pornographic etchings.
Women are barred from
launching and flying kites, un
fortunately, but you'll find
they're very good at reeling
them in while you mix an
other batch.
Enough. This correspondent
will be in Chapel Hill some
time before June on a State
visit; I shall be happy to meet
with your local representa
tive, on neutral grounds, at
that time.
- Meanwhile, onward and . upward.
'V
i
Va;aZ &&F?' Vr-'-Sf , -1
1 LLjrL I I a ''''-s 1 1 - -s - '
"The Political Pigeonholes'
Right Or Left
Editors, The Tar Heel:
I read with particular interest
a story in the Feburary 25th is
sue of THE DAILY TAR HEEL
reporting the results of a survey
designed to reveal the composi
tion of the study body with re
spect to political orientation. The
thought that someone consider
ed the survey a significant and
worth-while undertaking prompt
ed me to voice a long standing
disenchantment of mine with the
character of political discussion,
among students and others, over
the past two or three (or more)
years. The general type of ques
tion or statement that I want to
single out as the object of my
disenchantment reflects, as does
the survey reported in THE TAR
HEEL, a concern primarily with
Where some person or political
outlook belongs on- the political
specturm, i.e., whether candidate
X is a conservative or a liberal,
whether the author of this or that
book -is a rightist or a leftist,
whether so-and-so is a Marxist
or a Jeffersonian. I don't want to
deny that this sort of issue has
a place in political discussion.
But I do want to deny emphati
cally that there are no issues
which are more important, that
there are no issues which clear
ly take precedence over any
question about which political
pigeonhole someone belongs in.
If no issues are acknowledged to
be more urgent than questions
political classification, then it
seems to me that political dis-
cussion at that level can only
become progressively more
pointless and futile.
The reason, it seems, should
be relatively simple to grasp. I
had a teacher once who put it
to me this way. "It doesn't do
you any good," he never tired
of saying, "to know all the an
swers if you don't know any of
the questions." I think that his
remark sums up in a sentence
the PRIMARY (though certainly
not the only) task facing stu
dents in a university. Their task,
in my own fallible judgment, is
to strive toward an increasing
sensitivity for and grasp of the
Heelprints
Looks like certain elements in
the House are trying to get the
Farm Bill plowed under.
'Then there's the Don Carson
doll you wind it up and it runs.
Four bandits dressed as priests
held up a post office in New York
state. Hmmm, sounds like a
cassock-and-dagger story.
Definition: Camel an animal
that looks as though it had been
put together by a committee.
EVERY KILOWATT COUNTS-
1 iWJiy' ly.nr.jy
- ' ' i
- '4
9"
i.
iAmxmAwAi aaAk Waaaca
Letters To The Editors
large and pressing PROBLEMS
that confront them as partici
pants in their own changing cul
ture. This seems just as true in
the area of politics as in any
other.
The reason that it disturbs me
to see students dissipate so much
of their intellectual and imagina
tive energy in trying to decide
which political pigeonhole peo
; pie , and positions belong in is
that such a concern, taken as a
dominant one, obscures and sub
verts the more urgent task of
trying to understand what the
PROBLEMS are to which var
ious political positions are ad
dressed. Cultural, including po
litical, problems, if they are gen
uinely significant, are neither
conservative, liberal, rightist,
leftist, nor even Marxist or .
Jeffersonian. They are simply
there, HUMAN problems so
fundamental that they undercut
all the schemes of political clas
sification that we might be
prompted to devise.
I'm sure that it is a source
of some comfort, even for those
who have not lost sight of such
problems, to have their respon
ses decided for them once and
for all by calling themselves
liberals or conservatives. But this
convenience is" bought only at a
very high price when one allows
one's place on the political spec
trum to displace one's own CON
SIDERED JUDGMENT in deter
mining how political and social
problems are to be met.
That the "liberals" or the "con
servatives" will succeed or fail
to dominate the affairs of the na
tion seems to me less a threat
than that in our concern to
find a political pigeonhole we
fail to call the pigeonholes them
selves into question, that we fail
to ask how adequately the re
sponses associated with places
on a political spectrum can re
solve the problems we face, and,
most importantly, that we fail to
weigh the cost of relinquishing
the advantages of independent
and genuinely responsible in
quiry into our problems against
the cost of the easy comfort of
a political pigeonhole with its
ready-made solutions, whether
liberal, conservative, rightist,
leftist or what have you. It is
Southern senators will have to
Russel up some help to stop the
Civil Rights Bill.
Simile: as hard on your tires
as that "construction" on Camer-
on Ave.
Spring training has started, but
some campus politicians don't ap
pear too eager to play ball.
Is there some significance in
the announcement that local de
monstration leaders plan to stage
their fast next . door .to Harry's?
1
3
I
t x "'o
1 J W-"-
my contention that the growing
concern, evident in political dis
cussions of the past several
years, with classifying people
and positions which puts a high
er premium on the results of a
survey giving the distribution on
campus of conservatives, liber
als, moderate liberals, moder
ates conservatives, etc., ad nau
seam, than on the serious consid
eration of the question that Wal
ter Lippmann raises in, . THE
PUBLIC PHILOSOPHY,, viz,.,
whether states can be governed
adequately in the modern world
within the institutional frame
work of democratic constitution
alism. I would hate to think that
my students, to whom I have as
signed Lippmann's book as a
text, are really more concerned
with placing him as a liberal or
a conservative than with think
ing seriously about the urgent
problem that the book calls at
tention to, the problem of exam
ining the effectiveness, not of this
or that political program, but of .
the very framework of democrat
ic constitutionalism itself. I can
not help but think that a shift
of emphasis in the direction of
questions of the latter sort is
long overdue. I hope it will not
be long in coming.
Leon Galis
Department of Philo
sophy Boycott
Editors, The Tar Heel:
We, the undersigned, would like
to have it known that, even
though we may, or may not, ap
prove of the tactics of the Chap
el Hill Freedom Committee, we
agree with its basic ideals, those
of racial equality. Although some
of us have no desire to become
involved in the Civil Rights Dem
onstrations and have never so
much as carried a picket's sign,
we intend to at least do our own
small part by boycotting those
businesses which refuse to ad
mit that all men are equal, re
gardless of race, creed, or na
tional origin.
Eddie Hoover
Cyril Allen
Richard II. Kraft
Walter P. Forys, Jr.
Van Cornelius
Alan Case
Mensah Addison
Edwin R. Henken
Bob Thofas
Roger Kelley
Lorenzo Lewis
Virgil S. Crisafulli
Emerson G. Dickey, Jr.
Fred Hmton
Tommy Spencer
Charles Crumley
Tommy Dougherty
James F. Hicks, Jr.
vv--f -"
4i
UurJcSttvcn::
iMrllHidden
Booby Trap'
There's a lot more to the
Residence College System than
meets the eye.
The system, proposed last
week by Dean of Men William
G. Long and given rousing ap
proval by a number of Uni
versity oTi
V'A 7""' cials. has been
called a means
to m a k e stu-
dents feel they
1 are more than
"holes punched
! in an IBM
card."
I At first
i
9 '
glance, and
even after some scrutiny, the
system has the appearance of
a positive approach toward an
admirable goal. But there is a
hidden booby trap, and perhaps
more than one.
First of all, let's look at the
plan for a moment. Dean Long's
design, if carried out, would
probably result in:
social activities centering
upon specific residence areas
and the pooling of financial
resources for social purposes.
newspapers for the specific
residence hall areas.
giving official residence
college names to the various
residence areas.
each residence college
having a president and each
resident hall having a chan
cellor. faculty advisors for the
various residence halls or units.
campus chaplains for the
residence colleges.
deferred fall rush for
freshmen.
Dean Long has even gone so
far as to suggest that the resi
dents of the various residence
colleges might wear emblems
on their jackets to signify
their positions.
Now, as I stated above, cer
tain aspects of this plan seem
to be practical and desirable.
If they are successful, there is
little room to doubt that the
residence hall dweller will be
more secure, better cared for,
and consequently happier. But
now let's look for the booby
trap I mentioned.
First of all, keep in mind
that obnoxious new rule that
will require all freshmen to
live in residence halls next
year. Then we'll follow Fred
die Freshman to UNC and
watch him take up life in say,
Carmichael Residence College.
Sooner or later we'll find the
trap.
Freddie moves into Car
michael College (formerly the
upper quad) and immediately
finds a wholesome, pleasant at
mosphere. His roommate is a
senior who has lived in dear
old Carmichael for three years,
and loves it dearly. Freddie i
quickly introduced to his fel
low residents and given a beau
tiful patch to wear on his
jacket.
A few days later, Freddie
signs up for the Carmichael
Cuties tag football team, and
he is encouraged to battle
tooth and nail against the Fri
day College Freeloaders. He
proves himself by scoring
twice and is rapidly accepted
into the group.
Next Freddie is informed
that the first big social event
of the year, a Homecoming
Party, is scheduled for the
weekend. His roommate helps
him find a date, Freddie shows
up at Maultsby's Cabin wear
ing weejuns and white pants,
and wakes up the next morn
ing with a hangover.
Every week there is a meet
ing of the College, and the
president takes special pains
to see that the new freshmen
are growing to love dear old
Carmichael. He sells sweat
shirts in the official colors,
leads group singing of the of
ficial Carmichael songs, and re
minds the new boys to wear
their official emblems at all
times.
During the year, Freddie
uses the Carmichael quiz file
to pass Math 6, reads the "Car
michael Chronicle" (the offi
cial residence college news
paper), and meets with his
college's faculty adviser about
his courses for the second se
mester. When he meets a resi
dent of another college on the
street, he is apt to give out a
mild jeer, for after all, every
body knows that the guys over
in Cathey Residence College
are a bunch of "lizards."
By the time semester break
rolls around, Freddie is thank
ing his lucky IBM cards for
strategically dropping him in
the very best residence college
on campus. He is ready to die
for dear old Carmichael, and
heaven help the man who sug
gests that he might be better
off doing something for Stu
dent Government or some
campus organization, rather
than selfishly devoting his
time to his residence college.
Then, early in the second
semester, it happens. Freddie
picks up a copy of the "Daily
Tar Heel," and there, in big
headlines, he reads: "FRATER
NITY RUSH BEGINS TO
DAY." He turns to his room
mate. "What's a fraternity?" he
asks?
"Never heaid of 'em," says
his roommate.