Page 2
THE DAILY TAR HEEL
Saturday, January 7, 1967
Em Our Opimiom . . .
'Due To My Own Scheduling, We Have Failed To Cover
The Last 25 Chapters Of The Text. You Will None
theless Be Responsible For Them On The Exam.'
B
ullet Bob9 Is Shot
'War Is
Heir-B
ut That
Won't Solve The Proble
It was more than 100 years ago
that Gen. Sherman made his now
famous statement, "War is hell!"
Since that time thousands have
echoed the charge. Even Billy
Graham, when he returned recent
ly, from Vietnam, had to confess
that "War is hell!"
It is a generally accepted fact.
A generally lamented fact, but
certainly no one's new discovery.
So why. do opponents of the war
insist on distorting the valid
questions surrounding the war
with charges that civilians es
pecially children are being kill
ed? The recent "expose" that U.S.
bombing has resulted in civilian -deaths
was disgusting. Of course
civilians have been killed. Civil
ians have been killed in every
war in the world's history. If
someone could devise a plan
whereby wars could be fought at
the price of no lives other than
military personnel, he would pro
bably get a Nobel Peace Prize.
And if the chatter about the
"discovery" of civilian deaths
was disgusting, the special color
photo section in the current issue
of Ramparts magazine, showing
Vietnamese children maimed by
the cruel Americans, was nauseat
ing.
So bombing raids result in
civilian deaths. So children in a
war - torn land die, or if they live,
live with arms and legs missing.
Is this supposed to be something
new? Is this supposed to be uni
que to the war in Vietnam? Would
someone have us believe that the
Americans are the only ones -in
. Vietnam who are inflicting such
casualties? Who is naive enough
to taken by such emotional hog
wash. Certainly the cruelty and pain
involved in the Vietnam war
should be realized. Indeed, we
should consider the price of the
war when we decide if it is worth
while. But to play up American
cruelty, to picture civilian casual
ties as a front running reason
for ending the war, is but to
take attention away from the va
lid questions that remain in the
minds of many Americans con
cerning our involvement in the
Southeast Asian conflict.
To demand that we get out of
Vietnam because of civilian deaths
and cruelty to children is but to
say stop the war because "War
is hell!". 5
Man has known that for years.
But it has never stopped a war.
DTH Awards Of The Week
Syntax of the Week: To the
WKIX Radio newsman who broke
the news to his listeners s that
"Jack Ruby died this morning af
ter a breakfast of eggs, and a
bath." ;
Typographical Error of ihp
Week; Joint award to the Chicago
Tribune and : the f Syracuse (N.Y.) .
Herald - American. The Trib
carried this sentence: "Photo
grapher John Austad of the Tri
bune staff was honored with the
Beck Award for these phoots."
The Herald - American broke the
society-scoop: "Miss Neva Good
win Rockefeller, daughter of Mr.
'and Mrs. David Rockefeller, was
married to Walter J. Kaiser in
Pocantico Hills cemetery."
Unclaimed Prize Money of
N Unclaimed Prize Mone of the
Week: To the Burlington Free
Press (Burlington, Vt.) who, for
the sixth year in a row, had no
winners on its off er to pay funeral
expenses of those who notified the
newspaper in advance that they
would drink and drive during the
up for the period from 10 p.m.
Christmas Eve to 6 a.m. New
. Year's Day, bringing the six-year
; total for the offer to 141.
; Watcher of the Week: To Mrs .
- Charles Black who is not a bird
watcher, a bee watcher, a star
: watcher nor a man watcher. She
; is a Operation Watcher. It start
ed when she was 14 then she
was known as Shirley Temple
when she was visiting an Army
hospital in Orgeon. "A boy ask
ed me to be with him while his
leg was amputated," she told the
New York Times. "I held his hand
the entire time, and since then
have watched many operations.
Gall bladders are best the col
ors are gorgeous!"
Fact of the Week: The Amer
ican Carptaho - Russian Orthodox
Greek Catholic Church is a self
; governing diocese in communion
7orth Remembering
As Exams Approach
"No one can possibly be sat
isfied or happy who feels that in
some paramount affair he has fail
's ed to take up the challenge of life.
For a voice within him, which no
one else can hear but which he
: cannot choke, will be constantly
murmuring: 'You lacked courage.
You ran away.' It is . happier, to
I be unhappy in the ordinary sense
than to have to listen to the end
' of one's life to that dreadful inter-
ior verdict."
Arnold Bennett
with the Ecumenical Patriarch
ate of Constantinople (Istanbul) .
The late Patriarch Benjamin I
canonized the Diocese in 1938 in
the name of the Orthodox Church
of Christ. There are 69 churches
with a total , membership of 10,
000V' Headquarters are in Johns
: town, Pa. ' 1. . ..' " 1 r. i" V.
Apetite of the Week: To Leon
Samson, 28 - year - old Austral
ian who bills himself as "the man
with the steel stomach." He re
cently made a $22,000 wager that
he could, within five years, eat
an automobile. Already Mr. Sam
son has consumed one front fen
der, one tire, and one carburetor
and he figures he is right on
schedule.
Crasher of the Social Season:
To UNC sophomore Taft Snowdon
who appeared at the exclusive
Washington, D. C, Debutant Ball
complete with black eye patch,
diplomat sash and loads of (wrest-
ling) medals. The nation's bud
'dirig female socialites were quite
honored to be introduced to Lord
Michael Darling of the Australian
Embassy.
74 Years of Editorial Freedom
Fred Thomas, Editor
Tom Clark, Business Manager
Scott Goodfellow, Managing Ed.
John Askew Ad. Mgr.
John Greenbacker...... Assoc. Ed.
Bill Amiong News Ed.
Kerry Sipe . .. .. ..... Feature Ed.
Sandy Treadwell .. Sports Editor
Bill Hass .. Asst. Sports Ed.
Jock Lauterer .... Photo Editor
Chuck Benner .. .. .... Night Editor
STAFF WRITERS
Don Campbell. Lytt Stamps, Er
nest Robl, Steve Bennett, Steve
Knowlton, Judy Sipe, Carol Won
savage, Diane Warrrian, Karen
Freeman, Cindy Borden, Julie
Parker, Peter Harris, Drum
mond Bell, Owen Davis, Joey
Leigh, Dennis Sanders.
CARTOONISTS
Bruce Strauch, Jeff MacNelly
The Daily Tar Heel is the official
news publication ot the University of
North Carolina and is published by
students daily except Mondays, ex
amination periods and vacations.
Second class postage paid at the
Post Office in Chapel Hill, N. C.
Subscription rates: $4.50 per semes
ter; $3 per year. Printed by the
Chapel Hill Publishing Co., Inc.', 501
W. Franklin St., Chapel Hill, N. C.
'.SlMfel
between The Eyes
Contain The CMiaese
(Editor's note This is
portion of a commentary pub
lished in The Ecnomist on the
anniversary of the bombing of
Peal Harbor.)
There is, however, one
thought which sits less easily
on this twenty - fifth anni
versary of Pearl Harbor than
it did on the twenty - fifth
anniversary of Hitler's invas
ion , of Poland.
For the great difference be
tween those two long - distant' (
, events was this: when Hitler
started his European war, he
had considerable, sober, math
ematically realistic chances of
winning it; when Japan start
ed its war against the United
States, it had no realistic
chances of eventual victory at
all.
Japan could hope in 1941 for
the initial successes that went
in the 1939 - 45 sort of war
to any surprise aggressors,
and it did in fact achieve
them in full measure; but it
was obvious to anybody who
weighed the vastly different
scales of resources available
to the two main combatants
that, however far - flung Ja-
Sad Tale
Of An
Old Man
FROM THE MENTOR
The old man was seriously
ill when he entered Q u i n c y
City Hospital on November
5th, 1966. Less than a full day
later he was dead. And as he
died his hopes, plans and life
long dream died with him.
Forty - six years ago Sa
bastiano DeChristofor left his
native Italy to pave the way
for his wife and daughter to
join him in America.
Just a few short years after
his arrival in Massachusetts,
where he found work as a
stonecutter, he inflicted mor
tal wounds on a countryman
who had boasted of intimate
relations with Sabastiano's
wife while in Italy.
-De Christofor was sent to
Bridgewater, State Hospital
for a 30 - day observation per
iod which was bloated into
a malignant 40 - year night
mare, ending only upon his be
ing adjudged competent, and
a trial which freed him on the
grounds of temporary insan
ity during the commission of
his crime.
On a balmy June day in
1965, Sabastiano went looking
for a job. He was seventy
two years old.
A Quincy stonecutter heard
of his plight and hired him,
but times and tools and meth
ods had changed so that De
' Christotofor was soon forced
to ask for welfare. ,
Sabastiano never saw his
wife in America; he never got
the chance to raise his daugh
ter in his new homeland. Af
ter forty desolate years time
ran out for Sabastiano, and his
dream.
pan's first successes were, the
battle was bound to recoil in
the end right to Tokyo.
It must surely have been
obvious to those Japanese mil
itary leaders who were main
ly responsible for starting the
Pacific war that they were
singularly unlikely to be alive
at the end of it.
Today, many people have
come to believe that the sheer
horror of the hydrogen bomb .
makes it unlikely that even a '
dictatorship would ever start
a nuclear war; because the
dictator himself would be cer
tain to be burned in the holo
caust, together with the
rest of us. Even with a gen
erally educated country under
dictatorship, like Hitler's Ger
many in 1939, that is not cer
tain; a modern Hitler might
still be mad enough to risk a
nuclear war, on the half -plausible
gamble that nobody
might dare to stand up to it.
But the exaple of Pearl Har
bor showed quite clearly that
in the case of less advanced,
poorer, military dictatorships,
even the simples rules of cal
culation and logic do not ne
cessarily apply.
Japan started the Pacific
war because it had earlier ad
vanced into China, at a time
when resistance to aggression
was feeble; then, in 1941,
America was threatening it
with economic sanctions, from
which it could escape only by
agreeing to withdraw from
China; rather than tolerate
this "impossible" loss of face,
Japan's army and navy lead
ers perhaps partly overes
timating the consequences of
economic sanctions (as non -economists
frequently do) and
perhaps also over - estimating
the eventual importance- of
easy immediate successes (as
miliary leaders invariably
do V but for the most part not
estimating at all quite cra
zilv opted for disaster.
This raises tremulous ques
tions for the main danger be
fore the world in the last third
of this twentieth century. It
would be a bold man who
' averred that Red China's rul
ing classes today are certain
ly more educated, more calcu
lating, less emotional and less
rash than Japan's ruling class
es were in 1941.
China is still at the stage
where, confronted in any
grave crisis with a choice be
tween grievously losing face
and destroying the planet, it
might at least conceivably
choose to destroy the planet.
And China already has nuclear
weapons.
A frightening race may
therefore be in progress to see
which comes first: China's at
tainment of the capability to
deliver those nuclear weapons
plus some incident from which
it feels that it can withdraw
only with "impossible" loss of
face, or China's advance into
the stage where it will begin
to evince the civilising re
straints on government that
appear to accommpany
the emergence of some sort of
a modern "consuming prolet
priat" economy. .
Moreover, China m this is
only the most powerful repre
sentative of that greater part
of the world today broad
ly speaking, the colored - skin
ned part which still does"
not enjoy the tolerable stand
ard of living that most often
saves a people from govern
ments of desperation.
There is an additional cause
for alarm. The world, to re
peat, seems so far to have
survived the peak period of
danger from Soviet Russia's
emotional immaturity for two
reasons; the policy of contain
ment, and the concurrent
growth in Russia of a stand
ard of living where its people
now have something to lose
and probably do not intend to
lose it.
The Soviet Union will say
that this standard of living is
communism's own achieve
ment, and owes nothing to the
capitalist West. In fact, how
ever, the technology of t h e
mass consumer age grew up
in the West; and Russia has
had a sufficiently high level of
education to copy or even em
ulate some segments of it.
But it is very doubtful if
the greater part of the poor
colored - skinned world today
has a high enough level of ed
ucation and civilization to
make such successful emula
tion at all probable in the
twenty - five years ahead, al
though China itself is in this
more advanced than much of
the rest of Asia or most of
Africa; generally speaking,
the world's very poor will
need special aid to make a
tolerable advance to becom
ing mass consumption socie
ties, not just examples -to
copy.
What are the prospects that
the two successes of states
manship that have saved the
planet in the last twenty - five
years containment plus ad
vance to economic affluence
among most countries with
any real military capability
will also save the planet in
the next twenty - five?
On the containment of
China, far too much is being
left to the United States alone,
while the rest of the free
world sits, spectator - like, on
the sidelines and shouts point
ed criticisms at occasional
American clumsinesses. On
the spreading of economic ad
vances to the poor, the inter
national mechanism for aid to
day is limping disappointing
ly; in some respects, it has
even receded in the past five
years.
These are the thoughts that
should tear most anxiously at
the heart as we roll out the old
slogan across a whole res
cued generation: Remember
Pearl Harbor.
The Daily Tar Heel accepts
letters to the editor for pub
lication provided they are
typed and double spaced. We
prefer that they not exceed
300 words in length. The Tar
Heel reserves the right to
edit all letters for libelous
statements.
Editor, The Daily Tar Heel:
It is appropriate that the
student body president Mr.
Bob Powell, should admit that
his opinions are his own and
do not necessarily represent
the thoughts of the student
body, which presumably he
presides over in one function
or another.
I should be overjoyed if the
Daily Tar Heel editors would
offer a similar disclaimer.
Powell's assertion that dis
affection with the Vietnamese
war and with the draft exists
among college students can
scarcely come as a shock to
anyone. And it is certainly
true that there is not the
"onerous stigma" associated
with draft - dodging; today
which has existed in the most
"popular" wars , of the not too
distant past.
But I cannot agree with his
contention that this disaffec
tion of which he speaks is due
to the "nature of the war."
The disaffection exists in
large part because of ignor
ance and confusion in the
minds of college students who,
like Powell, have not been
told in a convincing enough
manner what to think.
Mr. Powell's psyche requir
es that a clear - cut dis
tinction should exist between
good guys and bad guys, such
as existed in World War II.
I have no doubt but that Mr.
Powell would have considered
that war "important enough to
die for" if he could have been
subjected to Gene Autry's stir
ring recording of "You're a
Sap, Mr. Jap" or to the seem
ingly endless number of war
hysteria films which grace
the late movie on Channel 5
with irritating regularity.
But Mr. Powell and his col
leagues in the NSA surely
the most impotent (in every
sense of the word) body con
vened since the demise of the
Know - Nothing Party are
subjected instead to the second
hand, propaganda of Harrison
Salisbury or to daily commen
tary by Morley Safer on the
Evil that men do. So what is
a young college student body
president to do?
You guessed it. -. , ,
Being most probably ill -
equipped by training or native '
intelligence to think for him-
self like most student bodv
presidents I have suffered
through Powell takes in
struction from the guru - em
eritus of the NSA, Mr. Al Lo
wenstein, who teaches him the
cliches associated with the
pronouncements of that most
preposterous and ineffectual
body, the NSA.
The post - war Progressives,
a hodgepodge collection of
weirdies, who constituted the
New Left of its day, were once
described (by Dwight McDon
ald, I believe) as inhabiting a
land of perpetual fogs, where
the warm gulf stream of ra
dical liberalism came into con
tact with the Soviet glacier.
Mr. Powell's fog - bound
mind would have surely found
a comfortable niche in the old
New Left.
While it is regrettable that
Mr. Powell must distinguish
between his ex catehdra state
ments and his personal opin
ions regarding events of which
he betrays little understand
ing, it is unforgivable that the
pages of the Daily Tar Heel
are used to buttress Powell's
invantile declarations.
In the January 5 number of
the Daily Tar Heel a person
or persons unknown has writ
ten a piece- called "A Signa
ture Well Placed," in which
the author writes "We strong
ly (a dubious adverb) support
Student Body , President Bob
Powell in his signing of the
letter etc."
Who in the hell is "we?"
I trust I am not included in
the unfortunate usage of the
personal pronoun. But the su
preme insult to the intelli
tence'of the strong - hearted
and patient body of students
in this university who look in
vain for evidence of a well
thought out idea in the pages
of your presuipptuous rag, is
your naive assertion that "the
office of the student body pre
sident carries with it a great
deal of prestige." and furth
er, "the public can realize the
respect in which a student
must be held by .his peers to
be elected to this office."
Prestige! Respect! Peers!
In case you haven't heard
the office of student body pre
sident is about as prestigeous
as that of the DTH editor or
of the resident canines who
fertilize the mall.
Since entering this institu
tion I have found no evidence
which would indicate that the
writers of your little tract
sheet know anything about
what they write. I realize that
the columns of the DTH have
to be filled with newsprint in
order to staisfy the require
ments of the journalism de
partment and also because of
institutional pride, but your
columns are almost as sparce
in quantity as they are in
quality. Not infrequently your
writers use one line para
graphs after which they skip
three lines.
And you probably set some
kind of record last year by
allowing your cartoonist to
- draw an obscene gesture anjd
then proceeded to editorialize
about it. The student body,
whose fees evidently contri
bute to your efforts, might
better be served by news bul
letins from Associated Press
or United Press International.
That way if the world came
to an end we might know
about it, and you would not
have to waste so much space
on the exploits of Bullet
Bob, our prestigious and re
spected president, the identity
of whom is probably a great
mystery, to much of the stu
dent body and faculty of this
ancient and honorable seat of
learning.
Will Rogers used to say "all
I know is what I read in the
newspapers." God pity the
man who only knows what he
reads in the Daily Tar Heel.
Harry Walsh
Language Problems
And The Blind Date
To my knowledge, there has
never been published within
the covers of this newsaper
a brief, definitive guide for
those girls whose task it is to
get some poor male a blind
date .
A friend suggested that such
a study be .compiled, and we
have below the fruits of our
investigation:
Be advised, ladies, that
those men who find themsel
ves in the position of seeking
a blind date, for one reason
or another, tend to look upon
the arrangement as a tempor
ary one at best, not designed
as a long - term affair.
For this reason, the male
of the species reverts un
abashedly to his primitive in
stincts. "If she isn't tough,
forget it," he dictates.
Though he may not mention
it, he usually hopes that she
drinks liberally and is the
vanguard of the sexual revo
lution. What he usually gets, how
ever, is a different matter.
The fond dreams are frequent
ly shattered when the woman
of the evening turns out be a
six foot four inch primitive
Baptist who could pass as a
guard for the Green Bay
Packers.
Since young men today are
deciedly unchivalrous, he will
either ditch her with vague
tales about how he must leave
town quick because his grand
mother is dying, or accept his
fate, finish his fifth and
promptly pass out.
However, if the one who ar
ranges the blind date wishes
the boy to meet the girl at
all, she must be doubly care
ful about what she, says to
him before hand.
When the boy asks what his
date looks like, he is trained
from experience to react to
certain key phrases. If he
hears any one of these, he will
likely call the whole thing off
immediately:
"All the girl like her."
This old groaner, when trans
lated, simply means that the
girl is so ugly that none of
the other females on her hall
regard her as competition. She
also is the kind of person who
can be depended upon to type
term papers at the last min
ute or make up someone's bed,
or maybe run errands.
"She makes her' own cloth
es." It's a shame they all
have to fit around her 52 inch
middle.
"She comes from a good fa
mily." So did Ivan the Terri
ble. ,
"She's a party girl." , Re
member the Dixiecrats?
"She likes to drink." Be sure
to stock up on soda pop.
Now that we've been
through it all, the only thing
left to do is to list the ques
tions the girl asks about her
dates: "Is he good - looking?
Does he have a car? Is he
going to be a doctor? Is he
rich? Is he . . ."
Ah love.
John Greenbacker