f
I
Letters to the editor
Martyrdom not for the L
Opinions of The Daily Tar Heel are expresses on its editorial page. All
unsigned editorials art the opinions of the editor. Letters and columns
represent only the opinions of the individual contributors.
Harry Bryan. Editor
Friday, February 23, 1893
.KeeB the
CI
comin
The infamous UNC bureaucracy
machine will begin to crank up in
less than two weeks when
'preregistration for spring semester
begins.
Printers with ink-stained faces
have been busy for weeks preparing
the massive number of forms that
will be filled out between now and
the deadline for signing up for
pass-fail courses early next
semester.
And the lines that will be
weaving in and out of South
Building and other departmental
office buildings are probably
already beginning to form.
First, there's the lines and the
mad rush to make appointments
with advisers. Students who haven't
made it to their eight o'clock
classes since the first week of the
semester are always up at 7 a.m. the
day appointment books are first
open.
Then there's the lines of people
waiting to get forms allowing them
to take the courses that are
normally closed out quickly, such
as Health Education 33.
.Now maybe students
can go to the same
Alas! Alas!
President Nixon turned down
Duke University President Terry
Sanford's invitation to attend the
UNC-Duke game Nov. 20 in
Durham.
The President is a graduate of
Duke's Law School, and when
visiting Charlotte last month to
attend ceremonies honoring Billy
Graham, Nixon said he wanted to
return to North Carolina for the
game.
But, alas, it seems he has got
Charles Jeffries
Demise
The recent developments in the Black
Student Movement regarding the
resignations of two of it's most important
officers would lead the casual observer to
believe that the demise of the
organization is at hand. But to the more
careful observer this assumption would be
the furthest from the truth.
To assume such because the group has
lost the services of two of its most able
members is to assume that the rest of the
members are incapable of carrying on the
ideals and goals that have been
undertaken thus far this year.
Ron Wesson and Bruce Sampson were
indeed valuable assets to the BSM, but
their resignations will not slow down the
effectiveness of this machine to be the
voice of the black student here in this sea
of w hite faces.
Nixon-Mills Welfare bill unfair
HR-1 piimiskment of poor? not
(Editor's Note: The following column
was written by members of the New
University Conference Women's Caucus.)
Next Wednesday night, Chapel Hill and
Durham welfare rights groups are holding
a People's Hearing to discuss the
Nixon-Mills Welfare Bill (HR-I).
This bill is another in a long series of
attempts by this administration to
manipulate and control poor and working
people. Although Nixon would have us
believe that welfare is rapidly eating-up
the resources of the country, the truth is
that the financial priorities of the state
have never been generous to poor people.
At present, 38 percent of the federal
budget is allocated to the military and
foreign aid, while only 1.9 percent goes
to public welfare.
Supporters of HR-1 call the bill
forms
aariie
Then there's the wait to see
advisers and then registration forms
that must be filled out, followed by
the lines at Hanes Hall when they
must be turned in.
After the preregistration rush,
there's registration itself.
With more forms, more lines,
classes on students' schedules that
they hadn't signed up for, etc.
And finally, there's drop add.
one of the more famous
time-killing, feet-pounding,
frustrating experiences an unlucky
student must cope with.
But at least when drop-add is
completed, it's all over except for
signing up for pass-fail courses,
which, of course, is worth the
effort. All over until preregistration
for fall semester begins.
Probably everyone will admit
that the whole thing has gotten out
of hand, that something different is
needed. No one, however, seems to
be able to come up with a solution,
and probably never will.
But at least the printers are
happy.
other plans and won't be able to
come.
Though we're sure his esteemed
presence would be truly
memorable, it's probably best that
he not come after all.
From the way his men treated
college students with just slightly
long hair in Charlotte, if Nixon did
attend the game, probably 75 per
cent of the students at Duke and
UNC would be banned from Duke
Stadium.
of the BSM is not
As Wesson said himself, "Ours is a
struggle, we have to keep on until we win
or are defeated, and we will not be
defeated."
Defeat at the hands of one's enemies in
the light of a change in leadership is most
disappointing. But to gain strength from
this change and to become even more
effective is a blessing. It will be up to the
new leadership to bestow this blessing
upon the struggle.
The BSM stands to learn much from
this development last Tuesday. For one,
it will learn that to lead is an ability that
all black people possess, not the property
of an elite minority within the race.
The organization faces a test, one
which will tax the strength of the BSM to
continue its present programs and to
'welfare reform,' but actually HR-1 is for
welfare recipients what the freeze on
wages is for workers a bad situation
getting worse. The bill guarantees S2400
a year to a family of four, an amount
lower than what recipients are already
getting in 45 states. There is a family
maximum of $3600 per year regardless of
the number of dependents. No special
needs or food stamps are provided for
under the bill. More important, certain
groups of people now covered will no
' longer receive any sort of help. These
groups include unemployed male heads of
households, singles, students and childless
couples, regardless of subsistence needs or
emergency.
At a time when overall unemployment
is at 6.1 percent and unemployment
among blacks is .it 10 percent. Nixon
To the editor:
In Mr. Weatherly's "masochistic'
U.S.A., ("whipping boy" article),
martyrdom is certainly not an American
characteristic like apple pie and the gun,
next door. This country will never be
subjected to martyrdom, for it crusades
for no one but its military and industrial
elite. The people who suffer are those
under the wheels of the American vehicle;
not those at the helm.
He accuses Communist China of world
domination goals; but perhaps honesty (if
there were any in U.S. diplomacy) on his
part would demonstrate that China's
'"threat" as "'public enemy number one"
is to American world domination. The
People's Republic may not be totally
cooperative as a member of the U.N., but
it deserved its seating if the organization
is to be internationally representative.
It is correct that adherence to U.N.
declarations is seldom, yet when was "the
last time that the U.S. voluntarily agreed
to a U.N. decision that would not be in
its best interests," to use Mr. Weatherly's
word choice.
His negative term, "impotent
nationality," concedes his image of
American world domination. If prestige
and potency are the U.S.'s prime
objectives as a member of a world
organization, or even independent of
others, then what democratic ideals does
America espouse. Hypocrisy in the
philosophies of spokesmen, i.e. Mr.
Weatherly, underlines the actual U.S.
directives. He "admits" that this country
is interested solely in prestige, power, and
what it can rip off from others.
In a concluding premise, he states that
aid be given to "those countries who have
proved their worthiness and loyalty." His
humanitarian ineptness does not consider
starvation, misery, disease, and poverty of
the world's other people -in their place
American supports the militarism and
dictatorships of Greece, Spain, Cambodia,
Vietnam, Guatamala and countless
others.
The U.N. is cited for its inability to
bring peace in Vietnam, the Middle East
and other countries. Yet, if honesty is
still an American virtue, then analysis of
these bastions of American involvement
would reveal where this "whipping boy"
nation was when peace was tried -with its
hand on the bomb releases, its thumb on
the people, and its ass sharing the
thrones.
Dan Brown
Chapel Hill
Gilliam's word
not reassuring
To the editor:
I would like to make a few
observations on the article "Pub Board
Fires WCAR Head." First, I would like to
point out that Charles Gilliam cited "the
many problems connected with having a
nonstudent for the job," and in that
"having a nonstudent deprives a student
of this opportunity." Mr. Gilliam's
concern for the student in this instance is
create new ones as proposed by the new
leadership.
Furthermore, the BSM has been given
the opportunity to discover the talent of
one of its members who has for a long
time been ignored, not because of his lack
of interest, but because of his ability to
work so hard yet manage to keep out of
the limelight.
Jimmie McRae, Wesson's successor, has
diligently and quietly been one of the
main cogs in the operations of the BSM,
and now he has been given the chance to
show that he is capable of manning the
operation and harvesting some of the
fruits of its labor; mainly the opportunity
to help the black student and be
recognized for what he has and will do.
As a sophomore, Bruce Sampson has
been illustrative of what can be achieved
wants to solve the 'welfare problem' by
forcing recipients to work. Nixon, in his
speeches to sell HR-1, has perpetuated
the myth of the lazy welfare 'cheater'
who refuses to work and is living easy off
the tax-payers' money. But who, in fact,
are these 'cheaters?
According to a recent survey
conducted by HEW, less than 1 percent
of the people on welfare are able-bodied
men. and all of these men have to be
registered at state employment agencies
in order to receive any help. Other
statistics include: 24 percent are elderly.
S percent are disabled, 1 percent are
blind. 50 percent are children. 3 percent
are incapacitated parents in the home,
and 13 percent are mothers. One fifth of
the welfare mothers are in job training or
already employed, but are making so
most touching. Thus his appc:ntr-en! of
Marry Poole as the new Station Manager
is somewhat puzzling to me.
I went by both the Union Information
Desk and the Office of Records at Hanes
Hall and was unable to find any record of
Marry Poole as a student. Furthermore,
Mr. Poole has almost no knowledge of
how a radio station operates. His first
contact with any radio station began on
September 1,1971 and then in the office
of Business Manager. He does not know
how to run a radio show nor does he have
any idea of how to organize a new staff
to operate the station.
Charles Gilliam also stated that the
resignations of the staff and management
would not hurt the station's operation.
This is very' reassuring but I can't help
wondering why the station was off the air
from 1 a.m. til 1 p.m. today. Could it be
that the students who were willing to
devote their full energies to their jobs
have resigned in protest of Mr. Gilliam's
actions?
John C. Brim
::: Winston
Rand philosophy
is not bankrupt
To the editor:
Some people never learn until it's too
late, and apparently Mr. Richter is one of
these.
Mr. Richter picked the right word to
describe Ayn Rand's philosophy, elitist!
However, her philosophy is anything but
bankrupt as any look at today's world
situation will more than adequately
prove, assuming of course, that the one
doing the looking has the ability and
intelligence tc distinguish blacks and
whites from the many shades of grey.
Mr. Richter speaks of these
'"business-minded" fellows as having little
"regard for their fellow human beings."
Either he is being deliberately obtuse
(stupid perhaps?) or, worse, he is
deliberately misrepresenting what Miss
Rand says. I'll attribute this to ignorance
since I like to give people the benefit of
the doubt.
Mr. Richter, just what is wrong with
rugged individuals? And, I might add, if
you're familiar with Miss Rand's
characters, how do you explain, "Eddie
Willers," "Pop Harper" or "Quentin
Daniels?" Well, enough of this to know
that Mr. Richter knows not of what he
speaks when he states that Miss Rand
leaves all but her "rugged individuals" to
fall, "unattended," along the wayside.
Mr. Richter, I certainly did not
contradict myself by asking "Who, by
God, would have a better right to make
those decisions of production than those
men who produce?" For one who has
intimate knowledge of decision making in
industry or any other branch of
"production," Mr. Richter's assertion
would immediately be branded farcical.
I do have first-hand knowledge, having
spent nine years in public work, the last
five of which were on the management
and supervisory level. Yes, Mr. Richter, I
saw the truth of my statement both as a
at
in the BSM in such a short time. In that
time he became editor of the BSM's Black
Ink, which was only a year old when he
took over.
Allen Maske, Sampson's successor has a
similar story of achievement, because he
too is a sophomore. And, by being just a
second year student, this will enable
Maske commit himself for the the next
three years to informing the black
student on campus and help train the
next editor of the Black Ink.
The next move of the BSM toward
unifying the black student on campus,
making his stay here more relevant and
helping him to maintain his identity is
merely speculative. Yet the quality of the
two new cogs in the BSM machine leave
little doubt in the success of those
endeavors.
little money that they still qualify for
welfare. Under this bill recipients are
required to accept jobs with pay as low as
75 percent of the minimum wage. Thus
Nixon's 'reform" increases competition
among the poor for low-paying jobs. Over
the last few years low paid workers such
as.municipal'and hospital employ es, have
been organizing. The work requirements
of HR-f undermine their union strength.
HR-1 also takes some
hard-earned nghts away from welfare
recipients. There is no requirement for
hearings to be held prior to termination
or reduction of benefits, and no judicial
review is permitted for any decisions
made by HEW or the Department of
Labor. States may impose j residency
requirement on supplemental assistance
Jespite the fact that the Supreme Court
hand
worker and ultimately ai office manager
and paymaster for two production p lints
of a ma;or industry.
Mr. Richter also makes the assertion
that individuals are unablt to acquire
necessary capita! to Seen production.
4 . ,
business
,c
many possible ones. I w ou'.J cite for Mr.
Richter's edification. 1 The statistics of
the small business bureau and 2 the
other being somewhat more graphic, a
company begun, expanded by, guided by
and solelv owned bv one man. alone with
all of
its
subdivisions
Carolina
Biological Supply Company - now the
largest biological supply company m the
world, thanks to the guiding genius of its
founder and president. Dr. Thomas
Edward Powell, Jr.
Mr. Richter cites the Nader Reports
and Lockheed as examples of the thieving
"'rich stealing from the poor." 1 say again,
that were Mr. Richter familiar with Miss
Rand's works he would immediately see
this stereotyped and personified by the
people such as Jim Taggart, Orren Bole
and Cuffy Meigs. While we're on the
subject of stereotyping, I'll go off on a
little tangent of my own and state that
it's equally simple to see current-das
examples of Lillian Rearden. Kip
Chalmers. Wesley Mouch. Floyd Ferris
and Dr. Robert Stadler balanced against
characters such as Francisco D'Anconia.
Ragnar D.. Midas Mulligan and, of course.
John Gait. For you. Mr. Richter. and all
of those like you. I reserve the
personification used by Miss Rand in an
earlier work in the character of
"Ellsworth Toohey."
In point of fact, Mr. Richter, your
description of "the thieving rich stealing
from the deserving, productive poor,"
taken in context is a contradiction in
terms. Check your premises, Mr. Richter.
for whenever you have a contradiction,
one of your premises must be wrong, if
you have a valid argument. I'm sure,
however, you have neither a valid
argument nor correct premises.
Here, again, 1 remand you to Aristotle.
The Second-Coming will occui before
you prove his basis for all logical
argument wrong: A is A.
One final question, Mr. Richter, and it
is: What would be your verdict for "Night
of January 1 6th?" I'm sure I know but I
don't think you have the nerve to admit
it.
Les Wagoner II
324 Avery House
L'NC-CH
Wage and price
freeze violators
To the editor:
(Open letter to the Division of
Price-Fixing, Office of Emergency
vjOmt a Sec. i'Ne.
T- Ovj THE PCORKM08.
(iif NogopY's &01M&T0 Disturb OS- ) M
1 1 Yoo locKEP -THE Poor. J M
I sf )( YEA, BUT THEN WHoSE Going Yj
M$j & To -NQuj X'yg CxOTTA' CHic j
i .ggSgs. IN HERE (!
tt.b mm m it m m i m nm i l vv. mm c mi i
kl VrlTti
welfare
has held such requirements
unconstitutional.
In the past, welfare seemed to attempt,
even if inadequately, to respond to the
needs of female heads of household with
children. Nixon now counts these women
among the 'cheaters' and has written into
HR-1 punitive clauses aimed at these
women. If HR-1 goes through, AFDC
(Aid For Dependent Children) will be
eliminated and mothers will be supervised
by the Department of Labor. A welfare
mother is denied the right to choose to
stay at home with her children. If her
children are age three or over, she must
accept a job, regardless of the adequacy
of available day care. HR-1 is especially
directed towards mothers and pregnant
women under 10 years of age the first
priority group to be considered for jobs
or trainins.
Preparedness, aur.gton. D C.)
1 would like you to m est irate some
violators of the wace and pr.ee freeze
regulations. Specifically: ( 1 ) lN. C.-C.H
Laundry Department. Last month, tried
to get them to wash-dry A. fold my
.laundrs for a week. The price quoted as
over s'l.t-0. about S 20 pound. On and
before August 10. when last used this
tpe of service, the price was 50 3.
about S 10 pound. This increase of
approximate!) 100 percent is clearly in
-iolation of the law. as we',1 as gouging
the low-ir.come student such as rr.yeli.
il) Servorr.atior.-Mathias (a subsidiary
of Servomation Corporation.) Although
it's hard to make comparisons with the;:
prices over the summer since no full
meals were availble during the summer
term on campus, their prices seem higher
than last year when I used their serve e
daily, and the quality of the food ha
certainly declined even if their prices
haven't changed -again an effective price
increase, gouging students on the
assumption of monopoly .
Hence, after sampling three meals by
the Food Service. I now fix my own
food. Similarly. 1 now Jo my own
laundry. It has clearly become imposs;bl
expensive to live on this campus. It's
enough to make a student get named,
for m-house capability of auxiliary
services such as those above, at lower
cost. (Fconomc analysis provides the
reason. In amoral Chapel Hill, the
traditional noneconomic reasons for
marriage have been eliminated. v he
booklets are distributed to minors telling
elephants what do with butterflies m
graphic detail and y oung peop'- --vc! in
"Sex Day " Oct. 7 - why bother getting
married? )
Will-am Jackson
Carro! H.tll
Alumnus lauds
Tar Heel band
To the editor:
Much credit should be given to Maior
Yesulaitis and his execution of Band Day.
Second, kudos to the Tar Heel Band in
the best display of showmanship and
school spirit in many years -they are
doing an excellent job for a generally
thankless crowd, e.g. no mention or
recognition in the weekly program.
Last of all, the cheerleaders ae the
best that I have ever known Carolina to
have and the innovative head cheerleader
ranks with Billy Arthur, Kay Kiscr, and
Dick Starnes recently as being one of
I'NC's best.
K.M. Lemons
Class of 7(
Ctotta' Pur A
reform
All in all, HR-1 is not welfare reform,
but a systematic punishment of the poor,
complete with monetary penalties for
minor failures to comply with the
bureaucratic apparatus. The areas of
objection raised above are just a few of a
long list.
Indeed, the welfare system is a
complex problem, but some people
understand it better than others. The
National Welfare Rights Organization has
made proposals for a more just welfare
system, including a guaranteed annual
wage of S6500 for a family of four. The
people who know most about welfare are
the welfare recipients. Anyone who wants
to learn more about the proposed welfare
system should go to hear them at the
People's Hearing for HR-1, November 10,
at 7:30 p.m.. New Town Hall, Chapel
Hill.
t