8 Tha Da:ly Tar Ho:l Mond.u . ' hfn.irv 1 ( H8 1
CIi orck SllADROUl, Editor
CSAD KlJTROW. AsHXUlh' Editor
Amy Sharpe, Production Editor
Karen Rowley, News Editor
Linda Brown, University Editor
Ann Smallwood, City Editor
Marx MuRRHl, State and National Editor
David Poole, Sports Editor
James Alexander, Features Editor
Tom Moose, Arts Editor
Scott Sharpe, Photography Editor
Ann Peters, Weekender Editor
le.runon
mi
il
Students tomorrow will vote in runoff elections for student body
president and Carolina Athletic Association president. Although
fewer students tend to vote in such runoffs, these elections should be
close enough and the choices to be made distinct enough to draw
a fairly heavy turnout.
The Daily Tar Heel already has endorsed Scott Norberg for student
body president. Norberg's experience, knowledge of the issues facing
Student Government and clearer grasp of its role make him .better
qualified than runoff opponent Joe Buckner, Student services have
been the focus of Buckners campaign, and as director of student
services in Student Government last year he was impressive in
organizing programs such as the Rape Escort Service, Fraternity and
Sorority Transport and Student Tutorial Aid Referral. Still, Student
Government should be more than services and clever acronyms; the
president must act as a welMnformed advocate for students, '
influencing administrators and affecting University policy. Norberg's
experience indicates that he can handle this responsibility while effi
ciently managing the other areas of Student Government- including
student services. V .
In the race for CAA president, Jake Kelly surprised many observers
by leading in the first election. Her principal qualifications are partici
pation on the junior varsity tennis team and boundless enthusiasm.
These attributes, however, are also her weaknesses. Kelly sees the
CAA as a sort of booster club for'Jayvee and minor sports teams, and
has suggested that the CAA act as a fund-raising organization for non
revenue athletic teams. Kelly would have the CAA supplement the ath
letic department in providing support for athletes, but the athletic de
, partment does not seem to need any supplementing.
Steve Theriot, conversely, offers a clearer idea of the CAA presi
dent's role as a students representative to the athletic department. He
hopes to bring continuity to a post that, has had little in the past and
has suggested a practical proposal for reorganizing the CAA's struc
ture. Theriot would handle the .4uti.es 'of CAA president effectively
while setting an important precedent of organization.
As last week's close races proved, a dozen or so votes can swing an
election. In the two races still to be decided, Norberg and Theriot have
the best grasp of the issues they would confront as student body presi
dent and CAA president and the avenues available to best deal with
them. But whomever students support, they should exercise their voice
in Tuesday's election. Then, with a clear mandate in hand, the winners
can put campaigning behind and get on with the business of running
their offices and improving The University of North Carolina.
President Ronald Reagan wasted little time in letting the American
public know he meant business when he said the federal budget had to
be cut. Reagan's hatchet man, Budget Director David Stockman, also
wasted little time attacking what he considers excessive and wasteful
government spending.
Stockman, a 34-year-old bachelor who once led leftist causes as a stu
dent at Michigan State University, has wowed even the most skeptical
since coming to Washington less than a month ago. His grasp of the
most minute details in the federal budget has left Democrats and
Republican, liberals and conservatives, impressed and somewhat more
optimistic about Reagan's chances of success. Stockman knows what he
wants to do and, more important, he apparently knows how to do it.
He plans to cut in a wide-range of areas from social services like
food stamps to aesthetic programs like arts and humanities. These cuts
will amount to $13 billion in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 and perhaps
$40 billion in 1932. The extent of this budget-cutting makes it clear that
gaining the approval of a skeptical Americans will be one of Stockman's
most difficult chores.
In virtually every area ripe for cutting, there are a host of people and
special-interest groups prepared to battle Stockman and Congress. That
a fiscal war is.imminent rartnot be denied.
Many of Stockman's cuts are brilliant. The fraudulent waste that ex
ists in many government programs lends itself to a knife-man like
Stockman. Yet, there are other programs that cannot be cut without
leaving lower-income people desperately hurting.
Cuts in food stamps, aid to cities, child nutrition and federal assis
tance to college students, which will affect about 4,000 students at
Carolina, are not so easily made.
That Stockman has sharpened his scythe is admirable, for all of us
must sacrifice if the economy is to recover. However, in his excitement
to rid us all of government excess, Stockman should take careful pains
to distinguish between the "undeserving" and the unfortunate. Other
wise, Stockman the wonderman is likely to become the grimmest of all
reapers.
The Daily Tar Heel
Asiistt Maatjlaj E&tors: Lucy Hood, Susan Mauney
E&iori&l Assistast: John Drescher
News Desk: Melody Adams, Laurie Bradsher, Beth Burrcll, Cindy Cranford, Kerry
DeRochi, Amy Edwards, Eric Frederick,- Dina Giugty, Cindy Haga. Lome Howard,
Pamela MarSey, Theresa Ngo, Michcle Pelkey, CiU Pcschel, Mdinia PSymalc, Leslie
Peyton.Laura Scifert, Dawn Welch, and Edith Woolen; Edwins Ralston, assistant
Weekender editor.
News: Mclodce Alves, Mar k Ancona, Ted Avery, RoAnn Bishop, Michelle Chmtenbury,
Sharon Darling, Nancy Davis, Ophelia Davis, Elizabeth Daniel, Kerry DeRochi, Lynn
Earley, Tracy l ord, Steve Griffin, Karen Haywood, Chirks ilemdon, Deborah Hlrsch.
David Jarretl, Ddlc Jenkins, Karen Kornegay, Katherine Lor.j, Dean Lowraan, Diane
Lupion, Elaine McChtchcy, Eddie Nickens, Lynn Peithman, Rachet Perry, CUr Pcschel,
Kaihy Pitman, Tin Pre; ton, Cathy Ray, RocheHe Riley, Mirk Schema, Ken Siman, Ectsi
Simmons, Trances Si! va, Andrea Stcmpcr. Bill Stu-dene, Jon Talcott, Lindscy Taylor, David
Tm IVp.V VV"t. Tamnv Wright, and Friftk 7!a
. V- - . - -- - - - ' B
Sports: CLfton Barnes and Scott Peterson, assistant $?ort$ editors; Kim Adams, Jackie 1
r.taskbura, RX. Bynum, Steph&jue Graham, John Itinton, Aizrn Kande'J, Geoffrey
Mock, Linda Robertson and Sieve Sicnersen.
features: P!a Brown, Richard Crown, Teresa Curry. Louise Guntcr, Mante llayworth,
Susan Hudion, Joni Kin, Kimbcrly Kkman, Susan Pructt Luce, Sharoyn Marsha!!, Joe
Morris, Tim Preston. E4ma RaUtoa, Kevin Ricks, Beveily Shrpard, Jonathan Snijle,
Plane Veto Cind; WJ-.h.
Am;Wh Royahy. anhtar.i editor; Ret In ri.love, Pt.il Galanrs. John I hmllion. Pamela
M.ulry, Connie Means, Rcb Monath, Mchnda Plyraale, Tim Pope. Mare Rocth, Larry
Reni Thonus, and Donna WMuker, .
Gfj;h!c Arts: Pan Brady, Greg Calibey and Pinny ilarre!',, arti-.ts; Matt Cooper, Jay
ffyman. Will Qcn$ ar.J Charles Wrncn, r-hotesrarhers.
Bv'rs: Rejeanne Caron, fcuiinr-s mansrr; Linda A. Cooprr, secret aryrroeptjor.ist;
' Karen Newell, dav'ds n-insr. Jenny r,H,!d:.n, acfuuntar.t, V.rrcn Aln, distribution
in j,n.i: -j.
A-Sei. " r.',ry M.Kcr...?; tUttx. 2, rr.jrf; P.-.' V:t r, tl,a:. 3
i tJ .'Jtiff - e. Vfve J ,,Ju,..aK.n.R.! iM.-t,ir,sfh::':is,J.:f
(.1, 1 rrry, J ' l f , . I "f S ...S 8 1 T. 4 V- "-..Jlt;': :.?v.
.( . : l.M" S';. "- U.' if r:.l.
I . : S! i ic !'v. f s!
tt
88th year of editorial freedom
To the editor:
We must accept the fact that no election
can be run perfectly and that a certain
margin of error is inevitable. But. last
, Tuesday's campus elections have clearly
exceeded any acceptable boundaries: sig
natures not required in James, ballots left
unattended in several locations, the Cra:e
polls closing 45 minutes early, poll work
ers obviously unaware of their responsi
bilities or election laws, etc., etc. .
The Elections Board's many short
comings during the election are perhaps
excusable. Their conduct during the ;
hearings of last Thursday night is not. It
was a meeting characterized by confusion,
an inability and an unwillingness to
grapple with the stated laws, and above
all, a desire to be done with it with as
little trouble as possible. Again and
again, complaints and irregularities were
conveniently dismissed as "inherent in
the system," and therefore factors over
which the board had no responsibility or
control.
I would like to single out Tom Jessiman's
case. Section 50 of the Election Laws
states that certification of election results
must depend on "Affirmation that no
Election Law violation, or other elections
.irregularities have been detected which
could materially affect the outcome of the
election." In a race as close as that for
DTH editor, where Jessiman needed
only 19 more votes for a runoff and 80
votes to win outright, how can the clos
ing of Craige polls 45 minutes early be
dismissed as immaterial? Furthermore,
Thomas Sharpe's investigation into al
leged James violations only determined,
that the poll tender had brought the sit
uation under control. He did not deter
mine that violations had not occurred.
Many members assumed that they had
no authority to call for a re-election on
the basis of the Craige case. Under this
logic, the Elections Board would be un
able to call for re-elections if half the
polling boxes had been closed by noon.
Perhaps their rationale is best summar
ized by board Executive Assistant Deana
Williamson, who said that members had
decided to certify the election results be
cause they knew Jessiman could appeal
it to the Supreme Court.
Passing the buck was not the function
of the Elections Board hearings. If any
thing, the board might have redeemed ,
itself by recognizing the importance of
election law violations and deciding that
a re-election for certain races was the
only equitable option. Instead, the whole
process was a farce, and election results :
remain questionable.
It should be hoped that future Elections
Boards will not only take steps against
unacceptable problems "inherent in the
system" but will take responsibility for
their own mistakes.
Jonathan Rich
E-12 Carolina Apartments
Editor's note: Jonathan Rich was cam-'
pa'tgn manager for Thomas Jessiman.
Ouckner
To the editor:
As state affairs director and executive
assistant to the student body president
and third-ranking official in the 16
campus UNC system of student govern
ments and as student body treasurer, we
have had a chance to observe and work
with both Scott Norberg and Joe Buckner.
Though both candidates have excellent
credentials and experience, we are con
fident Joe Buckner has the necessary
personal qualities and skills to assume
the responsibilities and duties of student
body president.
Norberg's experience as an executive
assistant and aide to the chancellor
committee coordinator clearly cannot be
overlooked. But the position of student
body president requires more than an ac
cumulation of credentials.
Norberg's ' platform includes provi
sions to use staffers to support student
groups and to raise the noise ordinance
limit beyond 75 decibels. He will also
work for a trial book rental system and
recruitment of minority students. AH of
; these proposals are now under consider
ation by the present administration.
Though Norberg's ideas are not bad,
we prefer Joe Buckner for president be
cause he has from the beginning empha
sized that one of Student Government's
most important functions is acting as an
t
By DAVID POOLE
ENGLISH RHDTEHM
INSTnUCnONS: :Choo one of the fclkmns questions.
Answer it.
QUESTIONS
I, Discuss the themes found in En-Iish novels since
1593. Talk about the authors and how they see
- the world. Exphin how cu'.tura!, economic, so-
ctettl, historical and ether factors influenced
these themes.
'.2, ' Explain how culture!-, cccr.crr.ic, societal, histor
ical and other factors have influenced English
novels since 1553. Discuss the thanes and tc'k
about how the authors see the world.
YOU HAVE ONS tlQVIl
It's midterm time, friends, arj it could not have come
at a won time. ! wen't be tckin any tests quiie tie
the one above (since I'm net in any Er!i;h courses),
but I'm sure my instructors come t? Uh scene
thins just as good on their on.
I Czrti remember much about the third grade, but I
do remember the first test I tock there. I guns e til
tc-Js in the first and second grades, hut we were ill too
t! -..') to know it. At j . ti ":d ;m 1; tesiwjs ere
cf i e most hc.-rci ct; r" r.;rs cf ry I ,'e.
All we . i in tf 3 vs I --n I ) s. rz v.crdi and
r - . e cf V :vi ; I -
r !f.Vh 1 i 17 i
i "r i .e."
2 a.r i, V e r
advocate for the students. Being an ad
vocate of the students does not necessarily
mean being adversaries with the offices
of the University administration. The
main function of Student Government
should be to act as a liaison between stu
dents and administrative offices, and
not as ah organization constantly in con
flict, with University officials.
Anyone who thinks Student Govern
ment can functioneffectively without
. good student-administrative relations is
terribly wrong. Buckner is the only can
didate to emphasize diplomatic relations
as an issue in the campaign. "
Students we have talked with say they
want someone with new ideas. Buckner
has shown innovative leadership and
' creativity by developing programs to
deal with campus security and academic
deficiencies Rape and Assault Preven
tion Escort (RAPE) and Student Tutorial
Aid Referral, respectively. As director of
student services, the largest cabinet post .
in Student Government, Buckner ex
panded Action Line, which serves as a
general information center for student
complaints and a referral for Student
Tutorial Aid Referral and the Fraternity
and Sorority Transport Service.
More importantly, he believes Student
Government must participate fully to en
courage recruitment and admission of
minority students and that the office of
Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs is a
step in that direction. Further, he has
pledged to work with Vice Chancellor
Harold Wallace and the Black Student
Movement in this effort.
Chancellor Christoper C Fordham
III, in his installation address, stated the
traditions of the University "... will re
quire a high motivation and commitment
by our students, a sorting out of serious
purpose from trivialities, but with a light
heart and a steadfast refusal to take one
self too seriously...." , .
The one who represents the student
body should possess the spirit of high .
motivation and commitment. Joe Buck
. ner has this spirit and will bring to the
office leadership experience including
but not limited to Student Government. .
Moreover, the ability to motivate large
numbers of people is clearly a skill needed
over the next year.
Darryl Smith
- Executive Assistant
to the Student Body President
Rochelle Tucker
Student Body Treasurer
Theriot
To the editor:
This year the clear-cut choice for CAA '
president is Steve Theriot. The other can
didates for CAA lack the original ideas
and respect for the student body that
Theriot is offering in his campaign. The
"ideas" of Kelly are the same campaign
prbmises that I've Heard the past two
years.
Steve Theriot is the obvious choice for
CAA president. Because Theriot worked
for the CAA, he has both the experience
and insight to be a successful CAA presi
dent. Theriot's insight into the CAA has
given him the ability to come up with the
ideas to make the CAA a more effective
part of Student Government. Theriot is
thus my choice for CAA president.
- Gray Jolly
109 Lewis
Mann in GPSF
To the editor:
The runoff election for GPSF president
presents all graduates and professional
students with a stark choice. The results
of the vote could have a profound effect
on the ability of the GPSF to act as an
advocacy organization for graduate
interests.
Because we are such a small minority
of the student population, the greatest
need of graduate students is unity of
purpose. If we are to protect our student
revenue allocations and our scholarship
money, then we must work together,
regardless of our political ideologies.
One of the candidates in the runoff
election has openly promised to "politi
cize" the office. Andy Harkov, with the
backing of a small (but highly organized)
group of political purists, intends to use
the GPSF to promote his own views on
controversial issues such as abortion.
Never mind that the GPSF hasn't the
(mm (DmszieZy cmt
a.m. to study some more. I woke my mother up and I
still remember the conversation.
"What are you doing up?" Mom asked.
'lm studying," I said. I was real quick with those
touh answers back then, too.
"My gosh, ycuH be able to f pell those words back
ward by the time you have the test," Mom said.
. "BACKWARD!!!" I yelled. "Oh no, what if she
asks us to pe3 the words backward! Tfl fail ... la Hunk
the third grade ... I'll fall behind my class ... I'll never
make it to hlh school ... I won't be atle to git into
cc'iee ... I won't be ab!e to be a secret ; -:r.t cr a star
football flayer. 11 be a nobody a'l my life ... I'll ...
1 !. ,
- TOrmi"'"r
4 h ' W i 4
0 ' f! ls i "
m m , s 4e is . ,
itinBimimur i i iiiim riiiiiniinii t i l mrr !" n'lf i-1'T
Mens went back to bed.
Tl : r r!; oer b the ccun-:'- cff..e c, "1 vh-t I
g:t t:;t tr.a':ty. Ti.rre r.utj Vn tear: 1 ti cf;.h.
t e t: tr:a ;v:: to Co z:i cn t:v, I A thst
C.:.;'t r- n trU s? il t-.Vl r.-.'.e r 1 .! C,t h
li.n. I'vir.rt-v'.'.MHrr.r.rnf i, t..t lti"-!t
!' t: :.:.rrs cn t ..e a "T r's G 'rU
V I wiiitiil
urn t .is :sy v;
O
slightest thing to do with abortion (or
xthe oil companies or any other political
issue), these fundamentalists of the left
will vote against anybody who, doesn't
fit their mold.
A candidate who runs for a non
ideological office as an ideologue cannot
hope to represent anybody ether than
those who accept his own viewpoint.
Robert Mann, the other GPSF candidate
has talked of the real issues of the cam
paign. He has called for a survey to
, ascertain graduate views, for open com
munication, and for protection of grad
uate rights. His non-judgmental and
unifying view of the office represents the
best way to ensure the effectiveness of
.the GPSF. Graduate students don't need
anybody to tell us how to think about
- sensitive and non-relevant political issues.
We do need somebody dedicated to work
ing for the good of us all. Robert Mann is
such a person and the best candidate for
GPSF president. ,
Ray Warren
School of Law
Editor's note: Ray Warren was a candidate
for GPSF president.
Vsnd snbsrgh for CGC
To the editor:
As a resident of CGC District 23, 1 have
been very concerned about this district's
representation on the council. I want to
urge the members of this district to vote
for Mike Vandeabergh for CGC represen
tative. ; - v
Mike will be a strong representative. He
plans to post in each fraternity and sorority
house in this district a monthly CGC news
letter and to visit each house from time to
time. The newsletter will also be posted in
central locations for those, who don't live
in fraternity or sorority houses. Mike be
lieves the CGC should be more active in
asserting student opinion through referenda,
. which have been effective in the past, on
issues such as the noise ordinance and
the food service. As a member of the
North Carolina Fellows Program, Mike
has worked to create a new advising pro
gram, and a pilot program will begin
next year.
I have tremendous respect for Mike's
judgment and his ability and desire to get
things done. I know Mike Vandenbergh
will be an excellent CGC representative
for District 23.
. Ruthie Leaver
- 406 Ransom Street
Course revisw
To the editor:
The Carolina Course Review is, in
principle, an evaluation service for the
use of students and faculty of UNC.
However, due to problems with pro- ,
gram used for the Spring 193 issue, this
i mosl recent. Course Review is clearly
flawed. The bar graphs used to represent '
student evaluation of classroom teaching,
course value, individual attention, text-
books, tests and grading, and difficulty
are completely invalid. For this reason,
the chairmen of the Spring 193 1 Carolina
Course Review retract this publication,
with sincere apologies to both faculty
and students.
Ellen C. Starr
John C. Rossitch
Editor's note: This retraction was issued
before the article "Course review sus
pended" was run Feb. . , . .
Cucknsr flyers
To the editor:
I would like to extend an apology to
the members of the Black Student Move
ment and supporters of Scott Norberg.
Campaign flyers recently distributed by
workers for Joe Buckner used my name
and association with BSM without per
mission. I am not an official spokes
person for the BSM, and the use of such
title is a violation of the BSM
endorsement.
, Wanda Montgomery
Chapel Hill
Pontics
To the editor:
We students have a problem. The pur
pose of Student Government is being
misundeniood, distorted, misplaced,
and thrown to the dos. In the self-made
tt.." ""ntwrrr- nunoir - ""3BCi 1. r "IDiir r ' '
Tl
r ' n
n VI
t'.
I r
.t tr,
t, f . : c
1 1'i t' :
l ' 9
o
intensity and bitterness of this student
body president camps
n, ideology is
Isn't the purpose of Student Govern
.ment to benefit the students? For this,
we need a person with integrity. I can
hardly see how a person can be called
"creative" for finding a loophole where
he could shadily buck propriety. Then
this person uses this loophole to create a
personal image, which turns a ccmpeli-.
tion originally based on platforms and
issues into a popularity contest. Visions
of high school pep rallies enter my mind.
But that's not the whole problem.
What about us students? Have we fallen
for it? Have you ever wondered how
many people the Fraternity and Sorority
Transport Service has actually helped
out? Was the Par obstacle course really a
one-man project as is implied by a certain
campaign pamphlet? What is integrity
when one must be prodded to tell the
truth? Are we fooled by a political car
toon which appears defensive but in
reality is so offensive that it must be
accompanied by an editor's note?
How about an editorial page story
"reporting" on another candidate's fra
ternity membership to the degree of call
ing the fraternity a political machine?
The mid-campaign timing and rude irn
. plications made by this story deem it
offensive.
Politics may be politics, but Student
Government is still Student Government,
nothing more nor less. I hold this philos-
ophy and encourage you fellow students
to at least weigh the choices. Compare
the experience and the issue awareness of
the presidential candidates. Be critical, be
informed, be independent. It's your duty
.to yourself. Please don't vote for a plat
form as ambiguous as one that focuses
on "motivating people." or that makes
light of sexual abuse in the forums in
order to break the ice. Vote for ideals
and, most importantly, vote for yourself.
, Tom Taylor
Tim Harper
and 12 others
Morrison Residence Hall
Scundcrs, Shsdroui kudos
To the editor:
It's election time again and I, for one,
am not looking forward to it. Choosing
sides in the race for DTH editor was one
of the hardest choices I've ever had to
make. Student body president wasn't
quite as hard, but still difficult. But, I
guess anytime you have to choose be
tween friends you're in for some sleep
less nights.
But it's always more fun to watch a
race in progress. It's not so exciting to
.look back on ones already won. By that
I mean last year's races which gave us
Bob Saunders and George Shadroui. ;
Bob Saunders has never been a show-
man and he's not a silver-tongued
orator, either. What he is, though, is an
honest, sincere individual who has very
quietly and without a lot of flash, run a
fairly efficient student government. And
he hasn't given any money to the
Marxist government of Nicaragua or
given away "our" Panama Canal. What
he has done is a good job and the new
student body president would do well to
emulate him.
George Shadroui has proven to be one
of the few truly liberal-minded people in
the universe. He's an editorialist that
you have problems disagreeing with sim
ply because he thinks before he writes.
And I think some of that thought fulness
may have rubbed off on some of the
other writers, although I always found it
easier to disagree with most of them.
But, he too has done a good job and the
new DTH editor would do well to
emulate him.
1 guess what 1 'm trying to say is that in
the midst of all this election rigamarcll
we tend to forget all the time and effort
and grades some very dedicated people
'have sacrificed. Bob Saunders and
George Shadroui are two such
individuals. They deserve our sincere
thanks. I'm giving them mine now.
Joey Hollcman
330 Ehringhaus
be bemt.
In this manual, there arc but three rules:
1 . Never ask a question that has anythins whatsoever
to do with anythlns you have discussed in class.
2. Never allow students to think they're prepared.
Always hint that there miht be something on the
test that even the most prepared cf all students
would miss.
3. Wcit at least three weeks before handin j the pa
pers back but hint repeatedly that every one In the
class did horribly durinj the interim.
Things, of course, are mush worse when you get In
ce'de-t because the entire tcademie world is bated on
the concept that no student knows as mush as he thinks
he does. Iff only lo-!cal that Ir.sirjctcrs trj.lt up tests
' so that no c.ne can make a perfect sccre if everyone
knows cverjthlr.s then why would we ceed instruct erst
My first test here came b class. I w-as a stup.'J
freihman end I thou;ht I hsd it licked. I wis certain
ti si I uc-td rr.sle a greet grade c.i t! l,::!: q-.'z I
h: J a! ays d.-r.e utilin h h t;h-' !.
t t rny r.s- ; ti.M. Afisr tt, h v. : t'l cf r.hiih I
r.-de the th'rd I r.t frs-': i i the c': s two P'T';
rr.' .; J i!r.s f e d-y cf the t u
:"i Ijv t t et rr i'.-. : i -n t". !. u.-. r. I
s 5
t ; .'idjvvi
f rr: a V. -t I
freer i:::ry r
k C.t
h-.i.cfcr i r.v.etnir.'U-)
- t ' . kw.rd.
- ,
it
il r. !er ). I C I :'t rp t r! ar i I v zi ti 5
r.'-j r
Ji.'i.-zn: 'sfMiV "yT.rl!: !.
-WJ MtmoWvr