utyr IligljlattiUJ Hflarotttatt U'ElMJi; J ( ).\ 'F.S Editorial /'age 'Editor THURSDAY, JANUARY 28. 1960 A C ROWN PRINCE? Nixon Handicaps Whatever Richard M. Nixon's ability ? and he undoubtedly has ability ? and whatever his char acter ? and that may be debatable ? as of now, Mr. Nixon seems a shoo-in for the Presidency. Yet already, months before the national conven tions, the outlines of what may prove handicaps are beginning to emerge. In fact, some of the very things that now seem to make his election sure may prove to be weaknesses, could even be his undoing. First of all, things may have come too easy for Mr. Nixon. The American people like a fighter, and the fellow who gets what he wants without having to fight for it has no chance to show his mettle. They aren't going to want the Presidency handed Nixon or any other man on a silver platter ; they may not like his having the nomination handed him 1 on a silver platter. Then there's the related Nixon luck. Year after year, he's hail one good break after another; breaks that seemed .pure luck. Americans like suc cess; they are fascinated by the fellow who seems to have a charmed life. But that is true only up to a point. After that, the luck becomes suspect ; and the underdog sympathy that is characteristic of Americans is likely to go out to the fellow who hasn't been lucky ? to a fellow, say, like the bat tered Adlai Stevenson. The 1948 election illustrated how that can work. There's Nixon's shrewdness. Again, Americans like shrewdness ? but only to a point. A man can be too shrewd ; so shrewd he excites suspicion. On the surface. Nixon's settlement of the steel strike appears one of the shrewdest political moves in American history. Yet it could boomerang; it seems just a bit too pat. For the moment, it made everybody happy. Yet the common sense of Amer icans is likely to reject that sort of thing as just not happening in real life. That skeptical attitude could lead to the conclusion that, ultimately, soNne body is going to have to pay the extra billion dol lars the settlement cost ? and that that somebody might be the American people. Nixon's campaign could appear just a bit too well organized, his machine could operate just a shade too smoothly. Finally, there's a question of how the American people are going to react, between now and next November, to the1 crown prince method of naming a President. Never has a Yice President been so well a(id so long groomed to succeed to the Pres idency ; the illusion is even being created that Nix on already is President in everything but name, and that he really would be merely succeeding himself. That's wonderful psychology ? if it works. But it could prove fatal. The Nixon luck may hold. The Nixon shrewdness may not be overdone. The voters may cheer the crown prince succeeding to the throne. But none of those is a foregone conclusion. Be cause the American voter is historically an unpre dictable quantity. A Wet Year? The weather is a subject of never-ending interest, a perennial topic of conversation. Often we talk about it, even argue about it, without having specific facts to go on. That is especially true when we compare this month with last 111011th, or this year with last year. We "think" it's been unusually cold or unusually hot or un usually dry or unusually wet ; but often we don't really know. Last year, for instance, there were many who insisted we were having an extraonlinarv amount of . rain. Others w\ere < j ti i t c as sure it just "seemed" to be raining more than usual: "it always rains a lot here in the mountains", thev. explained. . 1 1 ' " ? ? ? Well, TYA has come forward with figures to settle the argument. It was a wet yeiir. ' In that portion of the Tennessee Valley east of Chattanooga ? the portion that contains Macon County ? TVA reports that the average annual rainfall, over a long period of years, is, 5.1 inches. ''In 1V59, it exceeded the average by nearly three inches; the total for last year was 53.