Page TWO
THE PILOT—Southern Pines, North Carolina
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 28, 1961
C
ILOT
Southern Pines
North Carolina
“In taking over The Pilot no changes are contemplated. We will try to keep this a good
paper. We will try to make a little money for all concerned. Wherever there seems to be
an occasion to use our influence for the public good we will try to dp it. And we will
treat everybody alike.”—-James Boyd, May 23, 1941.
Revisions Needed in New Dog Law
While it is hoped that the town’s new
dog law will put a stop to children being
bitten by dogs on the school grounds and
to elderly persons and others being
threatened by dogs on the streets, there
are certain provisions of the law that
are giving numerous dog owners cause
for concern.
The law provides that no dog may “run
at large” without a muzzle, implying that
persons who do not have the time, the
patience or the interest to walk their
dogs daily on a leash should, if the dogs
are to have exercise, provide the animals
with muzzles—^yet informed dog owners
agree that a muzzle is an impractical, in
humane and ridiculous piece of equip
ment, to be used only in emergencies.
A muzzle is impractical because a dog
wearing one can become entangled in
bushes or some other place that would
cause harm to the dog or to property. A
muzzle is inhumane because a dog is un
able to protect himself against attack by
another animal, while wearing one, and
also because muzzzles are likely to be
badly fitted, and so uncomfortable. A
muzzle is ridiculous. Any dog in his
right mind would resent one and be
humiliated by one. Readers to whom such
a reaction on the part of the dogs does
not matter are wasting their time reading
this editorial.
sjs i'fi *
Another disturbing provision in the
new law is that unclaimed, impounded
dogs may be “surrendered” to a hospital
or “reputable institution of learning” for
research purposes. This provision is at
odds with the policy of the Moore Couny
pound which does not release dogs to
any institution, no matter how “reput
able,” for research purposes. Since Sou
thern Pines proposes to use the facilities
of the Moore County pound, we do not
see how this provision of the local law
can be applicable. The provision is an
open invitation to financial finagling in
view of the fact that “institutions” have
traveling representatives who pay for
research animals. This portion of the law
is thoroughly abhorrent to dog lovers,
many of whom know, through investiga
tion or information, the despicable con
ditions under which some “research”
animals are forced to exist. Whatever
may be the evidence on this score, we
say: let the researchers get their dogs
elsewhere.
* * *
Item number three: The law empowers
policemen, the county dog warden or any
member of the sheriff’s department to kill
any “dangerous, fierce or vicious” dog
which “cannot be safely taken up and im
pounded.” The question immediately
aries: who is to say what dog is sufficient
ly “dangerous, fierce or vicious” to war
rant an officer’s shooting it? Many normal
dogs will, quite sensibly, behave in a
“dangerous, fierce or vicious” manner
when threatened or faced with capture.
This provision is so vague and potenti
ally dangerous to dogs that it is imaccept-
able to most dog lovers. It is exactly the
sort of thing that humane dog control
laws are designed to eliminate.
This sanctioning of the shooting of dogs
(the wording of the law is that they “may
be slain”—but we presume that this
would mean in most cases shooting) puts
too trying a burden of choice on the of
ficers attempting to capture a dog. It
could also result in cruel wounding of
dogs who are shot but not killed.
:i: :!c
The thought that emerges from a care
ful consideration of the whole law is that
no town should enact or try to enforce
such a law unless it has adequate mach
inery to accomplish the task— a trained
and skilled warden (once known as “dog
catcher”) and equipment to capture and
impound dogs humanely. We gather that
local police are going to be called on to
enforce the dog ordinance, turning over
animals they have picked up to the coun
ty dog warden who will then place them
in the county pound which is located a
few miles from Carthage on the road to
Southern Pines, but still eight or nine
miles distant from this community. Re
trieving dogs from this pound will be a
considerable hardship on many residents
of Southern Pines. Certainly, the police
should, not be saddled with the job of
dog-catching, except in an emergency
situation. We should think that this feel-
in.g would be shared by the officers them
selves.
The Pilot feels a considerable responsi
bility in connection with the dog law, be
cause this newspaper strongly urged thav
the town do something to control dogs on
the school grounds where eight children
were bitten by dogs in the 1960-’61 school
year and three have been bitten in the
current school year.
We believe that the council passed,the
recently adopted law in good faith, mind
ful of the threat to school children and
to others who had made complaints to
the council about dogs running at them,
running after cars or otherwise being a
danger or a nuisance around town^
It was obvious during debate by the
council on the ordinance that council
members had hoped that some sort of law
could be enacted that would control
dogs on the school grounds or in the busi
ness section without placing a penalty on
the many dogs who go their way, for the
most part quite harmlessly and happily,
in other neighborhoods of the town.
Council members were informed by their
attorney, however, that they could not
enact a dog control law that would apply
to one part of town and not to another—
hence the town-wide ordinance that was
approved.
Debate on the new ordinance was not
extensive, although members of the
council did show some trepidation at
enacting so sweeping a law in a town
noted for its dog lovers.
We wish that the council had consulted
with several informed dog owners, with
veterinarians and with organizations de
dicated to the welfare of animals, before
enacting the new law.
* * #
As the matter stands now, with the law
on the books, we think the council should
very seriously consider amending the
ordinance to eliminate the muzzle pro
vision, the disposition of unclaimed dogs
to hospitals or research institutions and
the permission for dogs to be slain by
officers.
Further, we suggest that the town pur
chase the necessary equipment to capture
dogs humanely, either cage “traps” such
as the county dog warden is now using or
a tranquilizing “gun” that shoots a needle
giving a dog a tranquilizing injection,
from which the animal recovers. One can
hardly expect the police department
(whose members should not be spending
their time running after dogs anyway)
to enforce the dog law, without the pro
per equipment.
The treatment accorded animals is a
measure of civilization, anywhere. Let
it not be said that Southern Pines—
one of the most civilized, sensible and
humane communities on the face of the
earth—is to be found lacking in the
quality of the laws it enacts in this field.
‘From Harmony to Heavenly Harmony’
The news last Friday of the death of
Dr. Frederick Stanley Smith, of Raleigh,
must have brought sorrow to many of the
older generation here. Dr. Smith, before
he went on to be director of music in the
Raleigh public schools, as well as organist
of one of the capital’s largest churches,
was in charge of music in the Southern
Pines schools.
It might almost be said that Dr. Smith
started music in the local school. Deeply
interested in choral music, and with out
standing skill as a choral director. Dr.
Smith built up the school glee clubs to a
pitch of excellence never surpassed since
that time, perhaps never fully equalled.
As a student of music and a composer, he
had great understanding of the medium,
while his love of children and young
people and his delight in seeing the young
talent grow gave him, it seemed, special
powers.
While here he organized several glee
clubs in the school and also taught piano,
and singing. Perhaps his outstanding
achievement, while here, was the crea
tion of a girls’ chorus of fifteen to twenty
of the best voices. The group sang en
tirely without accompaniment and sang
like angels—for once the old saying seems
near the truth, so clear, so true, so lovely
was this group’s singing.
Dr. Smith was very proud of his
choruses and the students responded to
his pride and affection for them with af
fection on their side and admiration.
For many the sorrow occasioned by the
death of this good rnan arid fine musician
will be encompassed and sweetened by
i memories of the beauty his skill and dedi
cation brought forth.
THIS SEASON
Now trees their leafy hats do bare
To reverence Winter’s silver hair; •
A handsome hostess, a merry host,
A pot of ale now and a toast.
Tobacco and a good coal fire.
Are things this season doth require.
—POOR ROBIN’S ALMANACK
“Well . . . Il Was Nice While It Lasted!”
iiil
JO
•.■i-.v;..',-''.-
MS
-
<1 f tf
Oilfrcri-w:
READING PLEASURES 40 YEARS AGO RECALLED
Do 'Advantages^ Mean Happiness?
By W. C. BURTON
In Greensboro Daily News
Youngsters today have a great
many things which youngsters
did not have when I was a young
ster. Most of these things are
grouped loosely under the head
ing of Advantages. This classifi
cation is frequently false, but let
it pass.
I just can’t help wondering if
tb.2 ‘ kids of today are as happy
with their advantages as we were
with our disadvantages.
We didn’t have television. We
didn’t even haVe radio until I was
nearly grown—and for a long
time it was mostly just somebody
playing the pipe organ from KD
KA, Pittsburgh, or a soprano
named Jessica Dragonette.
Our movies were as silent as
the Sphinx. It was the day of the
reader. Even to fully enjoy a
movie you had to be able to read
because all of the dialogue and
a considerable amount of narra
tive fill-in was thrown on the
screen in the form of the printed
word. Such printed passages on
the screen were called “titles”
and some were very well and wit
tily written. (Maybe I’ll do a col
umn on movie “titles” sometime;
but not now.)
What we had was more won
derful, I think, than today’s “ad
vantages.” We had—though w.e
never thought about it in that
way—a full awarenes of the end
less, magical riches of the printed
page. We enjoyed the limitless,
timeless, miraculously simple
pleasure of reading.
Not that we were a bunch of
bookworms. We were not. W.e
spent a just proportion of time
playing pea-dabs, back-lot base
ball, cops-and-robbers and at all
manner of similar cultural pur
suits. There were some—a few—
who read little, if at all, just as
there always will be. Almost all
of us spent some time down at
the Grand Theatre, too, enthrall
ed with the derring-do of William
S. Hart or Eddie Polo or Tom
Mix, This, however, was limited
by strict financial allotment—a
dime onc-e a week for a movie.
For fun and suspense and vi
carious adventure, dependable;
swappable and always available,
most of us read. We didn’t always
read what our parents would
have liked us to read. We curled
up with the approved books and
magazines at home in the living
room, but secreted in the bed
room, the re might be more s-en-
room, there might be more sen-
and absorbed by a shielded light.
In our neighborhood, though,
the favored literary “speakeasy”
was a barn. There were several
excellent and commodious barns
with hay-cushioned lofts which
were superbly comfortabls in all
The Public Speaking
'How Good Is Your
Blood Program Pledge?'
To the Editor:
Have you signed a blood donor
pledge card agreeing to give blood
at one of the visits of the Red
Cross Bloodmobile and failed to
keep your pledge? Many resi
dents of Moore County have sign
ed a pledge agreeing to give
blood to replace that given a
friend, or perhaps a stranger re
quiring blood in an emergency,
and have failed to honqr their
signature when the Red Cross
Bloodmobile arrived in Moore
County.
During the operation of Moore
County’s blood program over the
past three years, residents of this
county have failed to donate a
quantity of blood equal to that
used by the two hospitals of the
county, thereby placing Moore in
debt to other counties cooperating
with the Blood Center at Char
lotte. Unless residents of Moore
County donate and send to the
Center as much blood as the hos
pitals of this county use from
the Center, this county will lose
Its affiliation with the Blood Pro
gram by default.
The Red Cross Blood Program
is one of the finest contributions
to the public that any one of the
allied medical organizations make.
It provides a large storehouse of
readily available blood at the
Charlotte Center, so that for any
patient in need, it may be cor
rectly cross-matched and there
fore transfusions can be given
with minimum risk. Blood is im
mediately available for those in
need, without waiting to find
blood donors of the right type,
when in case of an emergency re
quiring a considerable quantity
of blood, a delay might prove
fatal. The blood is drawn by. tech
nicians and typed and handled by
experts who are specialists since
they do nothing but work with
blood. There are many further
benefits, including providing
many of the blood fractions such
as albumin, fibrinogen and glob
ulin, all of which have a distinct
place in medicine.
Perhaps the Red Cross and the
physicians of Moore County have
not informed the public suffi
ciently as to the fine service the
Red Cross renders in providing
the citizens of Moore County with
the nation’s No. 1 Blood Program.
It is the tradition of our citizens
to rise to meet their needs. I feel
very strongly that if our citizens
of Moore County are properly in
formed of their need and respon
sibility they will donate sufficient
blood for our County to be re
tained in the American Red Cross
Blood Program.
When asked to pledge blood for
a friend or someone in need of a,
transfusion, will you honor your
pledge?
CHARLES A. S. PHILLIPS, M. D.
Southern Pines
but extreme weathers, within the
confines of that excellent area
centered by Piedmont and Irvin
streets. There was, most exquis
ite of luxuries, a livery stable at
the very heart of this desirable
community. It belonged to my
Uncle Rube McCollum and its
loft was our equivalent of a club
reading room.
W’e stashed in the hay our col
lected and combined copies of
dime novels and the lurid-looking
(but morally simon pure) littl.e
monthly publications which car
ried the perpetual advantures of
Dead-Eye Dick, Old Sleuth and
Young Wilde West (with his true-
blue sweetheart. Arietta.) We
made snug nests in the hay for
relaxed reading.
The great loft of the livery sta
ble was the choicest rendezvous
for the perusal of illicit literature
(our mothers and fathers called
it “trash,” while sanctioning the
drivel of Horatio Alger) but we
also patronized other barns,
changing now and again as cir
cumstances and whim dictated.
The Book-of-the-Month Club had
not been invented at the time,
but we kids had a sort of Barn-
of-the-Month Club.
I have had a lifelong passion
for words printed on paper. Like'
my friend. Dr. Rosalyn Gardner
of Gallaudet College, I will .even
read lists of names—of people I
don’t know. I have an addiction
to magazines. As a boy I would
lug home any magazines that
anyone might give me. As a man
1 .still do.
My greatest windfall came
some years after I had closed the
last of the “penny dreadfuls.” It
came at the hands of our neigh
bor, Mrs. Will Williams, whose
name was reverently mentioned
in this space last Sunday. The
Williamses subscribed to or
bought numerous newspapers and
even more magazines.
The magazines accumulated
faster than Mrs. Williams could
bring herself to dispose of them.
She would remove them from the
house and store them in a huge
woodbox on the back porch. It
was a well-built receptacle with
a slanted lid which kept the con
tents clean and dry.
One memorable day the wood-
box was full to the brim. It would
not contain another magazine, not
even the thinnest Literary Digest.
Mrs. Williams decided she would
clean out the storage bin and
asked me if I would like to have
the magazines.
It took me almost two days,
working steadily, to haul this
staggering treasury of reading
and looking material across Pied
mont Street to a room I had above
the tool house and alleyway be
side by father’s grocery store. I
used my coaster wagon and
stacked the magazines in goods
boxes in order to carry greater
loads.
Grains of Sand
HAPPY NEW YEAH!
Forehanded is file word, and so
GRAINS starts this column look
ing toward 1962, a column that
is as much an aftermath of Christ
mas as a foretaste of the New
Year, with words of caution: not
to say Warning. In fact it could
well be headed:
How To Make Next Christmas
Merrier. Or Happier.
Two items are on our mind:
Christmas cards and cellophane.
Take cards first. They come
with the loveliest pictures. You
want to hang them all where you
can feast your eyes on them. But
then you can’t read the messages.
Christmas cards are a delight
and a problem, leaving you with
demoralizing hangovers: “Where
has that address gone?”—“Were
there three children or four in
that photograph, and didn’t I
write ‘hugs to your TWO’ on my
card?”—“Is this their HOUSE?
This kind of toolshed-garage-
greenhouse structure?” — “That
doesn’t look like her husband at
all; what can have happened to
HIM!” and then there were those
four children we said all looked
JUST like their grandfather. And
it turned out they were adopted.
There’s one hint we’d like to
pass on about pictures of children.
You’d better not depend on looks
to decide who they are. When
you’re really stumped to detect
who the cEU’d comes from, try a
study of the children’s names—
it’s a lot safer. For instance, if
the big boy happens to be named
“Zach,” that’s easy. He’s bound to
be Zachariah Hoppit’s son. Or if
the little towhead who squints is
called Daisy, what about that
Marguerite Something. You have
a vague idea she squinted too,
enough to clinch it. But some
times you’ll get parents with
fancy ideas who scorn the family
tree and call their children Clio
or Artemis or Marmaduke Fitz-
william. Then all you can say is:
“It would be just like those Win-
kledinks to put on the dog with
their children’s names,” and take
a chance it’s them. (By then
you’re too mixed up to be prissy
about your language.)
Move on now to the other big
problem of Christmas: cellophane.
We hate to say it but it’s getting
worse. It sticks to things you don’t
v,;ant it to stick to, like your fin
gers or your hair, or under your
shoe and it is more impossible
than ever to remove from what
ever it enwraps so dearly. Cello
phane wrapping clings to its
wrapped contents with a strength
and desperation greater than that
of the mother clutching her child
to her bosom in the face of fire,
flood, or approaching murder.
Start pulling, bearing down,
wrenching with straining wrists,
and the cellophane gives a glassy
squeak of contempt and simply
holds tighter. Turn to your last
line of battle, the teeth, and it
calmly detaches a piece of itself
that prodeeds to choke you, while,
as far as you can discover, re
uniting its own defenses. If you
made a hole you can’t find it.
(Where are the scissors, you
ask? An irrelevant question. Just
try to find them. The cellophane
has probably wrapped them up.)
Whenever we start a test of
strength with this enemy of
Christmas joy, we think of a sug
gestion of Katherine Burt’s. She
said the ideal Christmas present
would be a claw, a talon with a
fine sharp end to it. This could
be attached to the forefing''r when
attacking a cellophane-wrapped
package. This only wou.d break
the satanicrlly pristine grip of
tills “modern convenience”—Ha!
Ihe gadget could be made of
steel, iron, chrome, or silver or
gold for the mink-Chase Bank
trade. Just so it was strong and
sharp and mean.
But scotch tape, now, that’s an
other story. One of the great in
ventions of the ages. But natur
ally: It’s Scotch, isn’t it?
Here’s to Scotch Tape and a
Happy 1962!
The PILOT
Published Every Thursday by
THE PILOT, Incorporated
Southern Pines, North Carolina
1941—JAMES BOYD—1944
Katharine Boyd Editor
C. Benedict Associate Editor
,Dan S. Ray Gen. Mgr.
C. G. Council Advertising
Mary Scott Newton Business
Mary Evelyn de Nissoff Society
Composing Room
Dixie B. Ray, Michael Valen,
Thomas Mattocks and James E.
Pate.
Subscription Rates
Moore County
One Year $4.00
Outside Moore County
One Year' $5.00
Second-class Postage paid at
Southern Pines, N. C.
♦ c
Member National Editorial Assn,
and N. C. Press Assn. '