5 CHILD LABOR LAWS j SHALL THEY Be RLGULATLD By jj The FEDERAL Or STATE ? AUTHORITIES ? r x _ . W-1 I. v O!? ?? JH* a Ji S_J? ?_*? <*?*> * ? Monibiy evening, March 28, 1U10, i llic following questiou was debated at Benson by representative* of the Benson and Ken'y Public High schools: "Resolved, That the Feder- , al Government should prohlbft chil dren under fourtein years of age t from working In factories." The af-. | finuatlve was represented by Messrs. j, Ezra Parker and K. E. Parker, of , Benson. The negative was upheld j ( by Messrs. Grover Woodard and , Wale Brannan, of Kenly. By re-1 j y hundreds regardless of the law. Atl hat Is necessary to prove that the itates cannot remedy the evil Is their ?ecord. Again, if our state passes ;<>od laws and enforces them and mother state does not enforce Its aws the business men of the former itate nre at a business disadvantage vlth the business man of the latter, i'lie business man in the state that tas the good laws sufers from the ? l(rhtnniiuiwiuu r\t tliof cf'itn'e Imv vhlle the business man in the state hat has the bad law profits by the 'ory wickedness of that State's law. rhe manufacturer in the state in vhlch the law is enforced can no onger employ cheap labor, he can 10 longer make children Into gold, itlll it can be done by every other nanufacturer in the state In which he laws are not enforced. Further nore, what good docs it do so far as (topping the evil is concerned, for a itate to enforce its laws, when In stead of stopping the evil you only nake it poslble for the mill men from >thcr states to come into your state ind gather the children together and ihip them out by train loads because hey will work so cheaply. State laws not only fall to decrease he evil but at the same time they lecrease the wages of the employees if our state at the expenses of the nanufacturers of another. State laws annot decrease evil unless they were ill alike and enforced alike. They mly cause children to be moved from itate to state. A national law would itop all such evils as these because i person would be subject to th<* atne prosecution under the law in lur state that wo would In another. Ml will ngree that it Is common ense as well as Americanism that ?very business man under the flag >ught to have the same rights and tuslness opportunities so far as the aw can give them to him. You will vlth equal readiness admit that there itv no two states that will make and ?nforce their laws alike. We of the kfflrmative have no objection to a itate havlug a law if they want it iut a state law within itself., as we mve already proven, is not sufficient. Hie evil is something which in its >roader aspect the states cannot each because it is not only citizens >f the state that are being ruined but ?itizens of the Republic as well, it ' s not only Georgia children that are 1 >elug murdered but it is American ?hlldren as well. It is not confined 1 o Pennsylvania, Georgia, and North 1 Carolina alone; It exists all over the I Republic. It is a national evil aud 0 fight it successfully we must have l 1 national remedy. Again the physical, mental, and uoral effects of these long hours of 011 and confinement on the children ire Indescribably sad, however I will lot discuss that but leave it for my ?olleague. Hut there is a question :hat I will discuss which seems to me alone is sufficient to convince any Irue, patriotic North Carolinian that we need a national child labor law ire 11 enforced. This question is a very Berious one indeed?the race question. We hear the assertion of the superiority of the white ra e made time and time again, that the white race will never yield to the black race, yet the children who are at work in the southern cotton mills are from the white working class of the south and this terrible situation stares the south in the face, that whereas the children of the white working people of the south are go ing tojhe factories and to decay, the negro child rei) are going to s hool an development. Ludi' s in.4 gentlemen if we are not to give some serious attuetlon to human facts like these, how can we wonder at the creation of a class in this country which when we con t mplate its existence makes every one of us tremble. It is enough to wring the heart and make the blood boil in the veins of every true sou thern man to think that day by day wr are permitting a system to go on which is steadily weakening the white race for the future and steadily strengthening the black. It Is not In the power of any man to keep "su perior," by asserting superiority. The truth of it is the south is face to face with the situation of our white childreu in the mills and our tylaclc children in the schools. Rev. A. J. McKelway, of North Carolina, in visiting the mills In the south said that he saw this very for cibly illustrated where the opera tives of a mill were coming out of the mill for their midday meal. At the same time he saw a large number of negro children coming out of a negro school near by for recess. The contrast was noticeable In the partic ular that the negro children were playing and snow-balling each other on their way home, while the white children were hurrying along with anxious faces to their lunch so as to return to the mill in time. Friends there is one way and only one way to solve the race question In the south to-day, that Is to take our white children out of the mills' while they are bright, young and can comprehend easily and put In school instead of the'negroes. I Again, Honorable Judges, there is lilt- i uuscquL-urt's 1111 uuiy ui me la bor of children, not only the ruin of their lives and health, but the certain leterlara ion and the establishment sf an ever lacreaslug degenerate ?lass in America, caused by the weak ness of the motherhood of our coun try- To develop a nation of intelli gent people we must have strong, healthy, educated mothers. This we ran never have so long as we let ( jur young girls work in factories. Put ( \ girl In a factory from the ages of ( 5 to 14 and she is not only physically , infit for motherhood, but at the same ime she hasen't the intelligence a ( nother ought to have. It is the du- ( y of the father to provide for the ^ lome while It is the duty of the mo her to teach in the home. And how ;an a mother teach who knows noth- ( ng to teach on account of being kept n a factory when a girl instead of J n school. An ignorant, unhealthy ( nother raises up Illiterates and phy- , ileal wrecks, while intelligent and lealthy mothers, whose health and in elligence has not been wrecked dur- j ng her young age In a factory or the j ike, raise up children whose health , ind intelligence can be sien at a single glance in their rosy cheeks md sparkling eyes. It is in the name of the motherhood )f our country and the bright youths J hat we are pleading with you to-' light. The evil of taking these bright youths and murdering them In the | actories of our country must be stopped, and stopped now. The evi- , lence is before us of their murder ^ jy thousands. The only verdict that tve can return is guilty. Then how | shall we stop it? The states have 1 ried, they cannot, they have failed. ' The only remedy is for the nation to1 lo It. When we think about these evils -xisting under our government we ' jften wonder what the purposes of ? )ur government are any way. Why ' ivas It that this Republic was estab- ' lished? What does our flag stand for? What do all these things mean? La lles and gentlemen they mean that j the people shall be free to correct liuman abuses. They mean that men, ? women and children shall day by day grow stronger and nobler. They mean 1 that we shall have the power to make 1 this America of ours each day a lovller place to live In. If they do not mean these things, then our Institu tions. this Republic, and our flag have no reason for existence. If they do mean these things we must pass such laws as will help to develdh a nation of wholesome homes, true to the Holiest ideals of man; a nation whose power Is glorified by Us jus tice and whose justice is the consci ence of millions of free, strong, brave people. It is to make this people such a nation that all our forefathers fowht and planned. Friends they have done their part well. Now, how are we doing ours? They presented to us a golden opportunity, and the question with us Is will we accept It. We should show our appreciation of what they have done for us by continuing to progress. And I de Clare to you that th-ire Is no nay In which we can shnw our appreciation better lt.au ly, at tl.e pris.nt tirn?, pausing a national child 'atcr aw. Speech of E ra Pa-ker de lve:ed March !i8, 1910. Gro/er Wooiard De'inds the Negative Mr. Chairman, Ladies, Gentlemen and Honorable Judge*: We of the negative do not propose to advocate or de'end clii d labor In factories. We shall not claim that It does not exist. We shall not claim that It is Leneti ial to the children as to society. We know it exists, we denounce it as a curse, which must be checked, an evil which must be remedied. We advocate stroi g leg islation to correct'It. Put, sirs, what is effective leglsaltion? You are told by the affirmative something of the conditions and how the federal gov ernment might correct it. Let us notice also state legislation protective a ike to the chi dren an 1 lndu try. Should we judge from the argument of the affirmative we would get the idea that the states are not remedyln fhe evil and are almost powerless to cope with it. Nor do we claim that the state laws are perfect. Nothing of human creation is. But, sirs, by giving abstracts from the state laws and naming the states having such laws, we shall show that the states are fighting the evil, and fighting it on a bases the federal government can never attempt. What we shall say of such laws is based on the Hand book of Child Labor Legislation, compiled by Joseph C. Goldsmith, Na tional Consumers League, New York City. It will deal with statistics, hence it might be a bit boring. The first thing of importance in child la'ior legislation is an age limit which varies from 12 to 16 years, making a general average of about 14 years. Iowa, Ind., Ky., Mich., N. Y., Ohio, Wis., Conn., Mass., Minn., Neb., Ariz., R. 1., Wash., W. Va., Ark., Col., Del., Kan., La., Me., Miss., N. J., T< nn , Ala., Mo., S. D., Utah and Wyo., prohibit employment of children in factories Below 14 years of age. Col., Conn.. 111., Mass., Minn., Mo., Me, N. H., N. Y., N. I)., Ohio, Ariz., S. I)., Vt., Wis., Wash., prohibit em ployment In all vacatiors during school hours until child is 14 years of age, ai'd any until 16 unless educa tional requirements have been com plied with. Ga., S. C., Va., N. C., N. II.. N. D., Vt., allow no children under 12 to work in factories. In Ala., Ark. and Ga., in the exceptional cases of orphans and childr. n of disabled par snts, they are allowed to work as ?arly as ten. The states having an ige limit are Ariz., D. of C. and N. Mex. But these are either territory controlled by the federal government >r are new slates whose laws are ust being formed. Now, let us show you what the itates are doing to restrict the hours >f labor, and to educate those who ire not allowed to work. Twenty hree states prohibit night work by 'hildren below 14-18 years of age. Mich., Ore., prohibit work between 6 J. m. and 7 a. m. Ohio, 111., Minn., *Cy., Mass., Ark., Ga. and Ala., prohi jit work from 7 p. m. till 6 a. m. The aws of Vt., R. I., Wis., Wash., Penn., Mo., Col., Ind, Neb. and S. C., pro ride that there shall be from 8-10 lours during night in which no chil Iren are permitted to work. Ohio, 111., Col., N. J., N. V., Mass.1 ind It. I., restrict work by children inder 16-18 from 8-10 hours in 24, md from 48-36 in a week. Ariz., Col., Mo. and Utah restrict work by the lay to 8 hours in 24 by those below 14-18. Wash., N. D., S. D., Md. and ^'a. ten hours in 24. One of the most effective ways of preventing legal employment of chil-' Iren is compulsory school attendance. - Wy., Ariz., Me., Mo., Col., Minn., N.' Mex., Penn, Wis., Ohio. N. Y., Mass.,1 ind Conn, require school attendance1 'rom 12 weeks to the entire school >var up to the age of 16. Mo., H. I., Vt., Wash., Kan., Neb., and Mich, require attendance from 28 weeks to the entire school year up to the age of 15 years. Twenty-five states make attendance compulsory [rom 12 weeks to the entire school rear up to 15 years of age. Those states having compulsory school attendance have the most ef fective child labor laws. N. Y. and Ariz, require children under 16 to have a school record sigt.ed by au thorities of the school certifying that they have finished the elemuitary studies. Moq. and Ohio require those under 16 and Wash under 15 to have finished a reasonable course of study l before they may be employed. Del., Ua., and La. require children below 14-16 to have a certificate or affida vit showing that they attended s< hool at least 12 weeks of the preceding year. Fifteen states prohibit children tielow 14-16 working unless thiy can r-ad and write Engli-h. The majori ty of the states require working pa pers?working ctr<.ifLa es of age and schooling either from school of ficials, health inspectors or factory inspectors. Me., Mass., Conn., R. I., N. Y., N J., Ind., Ohio, Wis., 111., Kan., Neb., Minn., Mo., Md., Col., Ariz., and Wash, require of those be low 14-16 documentary proof of the age and schooling signed by one of the above named officials. In fif teen states the affidavit of parents or guardians is required as to the age and schooling of those below 14 16. Some exceptions are made to the above. The most important ex ceptions of those laws allowing work under age are of orphan children, of disabled parents or widowed mothers, or of those too poor to live without work. Eleven states allow children 12-16 to work in cases of extreme poverty. The federal government would have to allow the same unless the hand of charity were carried to their rescue. No form of law by whatsoever power administered,' whether federal government or states Is absolute. Exceptions must be mate to all human organisms. A majority ? of the states provide for a compe tent Loard of inspectors and give them the power to enforce the law. j Twenty-seven states provide chief in spectors or commissioners cf labor to have charge of the work font 4-40 deputies. Co., Me., N. H., N. D., S. | D., and Vt. pay school officials and vest them with po'ice powers to en force the laws. The penalties for breaking the' child labor laws fa'l under two heads ' (?penalties for the t mployer and pen alties for the parents or guardians. If a factory man employs children un der age and over time he is fined j from $5.00-$100.00 and inprisor.ei 10 90 days. If he employs them during school hours the fine is the same with 10-30 days imprisonment. In case, the employer does not kei p or file the schooling certificates in or der to be able to produce them for the inspector the fine is from $3.00 $300.00 and imprisonment 10-90 days. Should an empolyer refuse entrance' to an inspector or school authorities' the fine and imprisonment is the' same. Should a parent permit illit erate children to be employed with out attending day or night school the fine Is from $3.00-$100.00 and impris-! onment 10-90 da>s. Should the pa- ^ rent make a false statement in age or schooling certificate a fine of from $3.00-$500.00 and imprisonment 10-90 days as the penalty. Now, gentle-J men, we have shown you what the 1 f ates are doing. We have shown you I he nature of the states' laws; what they provide for on age limit averag ing about 14 years of age; that a lim ited number of hours for work are specified, that these laws have pro-' visions for enforcement, and that the breaker of such law s is punished by j both fine and imprisonment. And the beauty about such laws is that the1 children are not only prohibited from' working in factories but are compell-'