? -y
l;
: ?
"e
m
_ r
-sSsT
J*S
ka**?T
?m- .
-????-? :.',? --?' ? - .:? ' ' . - . . ? . -K. ? ? / ~-.?
* fc1# "t.- . , . ?!: '' . ?: -\v : ./:
;
sr.;
pioneer befoaeandafter. him, had a hard time
convinringpeople that he knew whatehe was
talking about* He was more progressive than
his-fellows. Hie ideas were way" ahead of
his time. He suffered the consequences...
until, he proved that* he was- right. Smith
Deugtafr has a, feUow feeling for pioneers
who havedared to be different.
?P-Hs
Ifmsbt to ma&e TOBACCO PLANT
a Lii -m *?
|S^yi|lJb|i -.^?i .v i^--t?- ^^BiBpBlHipBI
-i
Ybnmayrecalfthat SmitiL-DougJass was the
first to make ?^ertttiserespeel8liy<forTolifl?
co Plant-Beds. Prior to that time* am* tobac
co fertilizer was "good enough"* for pttirt -l
beds. Smith-Douglass didn't think so. They
made one that was better. Farmers and. con*
petitors were jskepticaJL But you know the
atory. Fertilizer manufacturers have been
- v
trying ever since to make a fertilizer like S-D
"Blue Ribbon Guano" for tobacco plant beds.
'iiift-A ? m ?-? m m m, i . m*.. mWJs*? ?*. inato
r I FAMOUS S-D "ORANGE?; ? ;0 #
nr a ft twmvnnvM.Tm 9 ' '
- WAS DIFFERENT, TOO
Remember
<% ?
. -
HI
IMsi
j.i ? ";$fc ; , >i; . '?- ? ? > " ".?$ v. -, '" SgV..
S '.**?
x ? \t ^ ? : ? '. '?
differ?St;too. Today competitors are frankly,
jealous of the reputation that this and other <
Smith-Douglass Fertilizers have attained.,^
*
Smith*Douglass firmly believes that you can
never' manufacture a better fertilizer if you
art content to make your goods "just like" or
merely "just as good as" the other fellow's,
fe. ^Swt m good" isn't good enough for Smith
Dougjass. We have always pioneered in our
fertilizer formulas. Results have justified our
judgment. S-D Tobacco-Fertilizers have con
sistently given the tobacco farmer more
pounds of tobacco and more dollars for his
crop. Wo are convinced that tobacco farmers
want that kind of fertilizer. We feel that we
would he lacking in our duty to our customers
unless we continue to pioneer in making
that kind of fertilizer for them. Yes, Smith
Douglass Fertilizers are "Different." KJhey
could never have attained their reputatjgn
ottigfwise^
? . w- , m ? mux* '-?? ? V sift.#
vtt >
v.
.yC
?: . vs0- ;? "r-~
"
1