1 ' i Zf GWU Sports Softball p. 11 Javelin thrower p. 12 Big Rich p. 12 77,^piter Gardner-Webb University other News student arrests p. 5 Henderson leaving p. 7 Weekend excursion p. 9 Friday, April 19,2002 WWW. gwupilot. com Volume 5 No. 13 Making ‘cents’ of Gardner-Webb scholarships Focus I Future 1905 — 2002 Part 4 of a 5-Part PiT^ series on the past, present and future of GWU Jennifer Menster Pilot web editor What draws students to Gardner-Webb University? Is it the Christian environ ment? The faculty and staff? The Caf food? For the majority of students it is not the Caf food, but the help of scholarships. According to Patty Cope, director of financial planning, 80 percent of Gardner-Webb students receive non-need- based scholarships. Of that 80 percent, three-fourths receive academic money and the rest receive athletic money. In the 1999-2000 school year, which happened to be Gardner-Webb's fmal year of Division II, there was $5 mil lion budgeted for scholarships. Fifty-five percent of that $5 million went to academic stu dents; the other 45 percent went to athletes. Over the last two years, however, the numbers have flip-flopped, according to research gathered by Jeff Tubbs, GWU's assistant vice president for institutional research. In the 2001-2002 school year, there was $6 mil lion available for scholarships. Fifty-seven percent went to athletes and 43 percent went to academic students. Of the total scholarship money, athletes received $3.4 million, a $1.1 million increase since the 1999-2000 school year. Many may speculate that the scholarship reversal is due to the move to Division I. However, GWU president Christopher White, believes the figures can be misleading. According to White, under Division I rules, the academic money athletes receive is counted as athletic money. So, when the school went under Division I rules two years ago, an increase was expected. “Not all the money athletes receive is athletic money,” White explained. “It is ‘stacking’ dif ferent kinds of money and just added together.” The ‘different kinds of money’ athletes receive include athletic money and grants from Gardner-Webb. If, for example, an athlete receives 75 percent of his/her scholarship from ath letic money, academic money may be used to cover the other 25 percent. This increases the number of full-ride scholar ships for athletes. The academic money is then counted under athletic scholarship spending while the money is taken from the acade mic scholarship budget. According to White, the apparent increase in athletic scholarship spending will bene fit the university. “Almost every good school in the nation is Division I,” he said. “Becoming a Division I school has nothing to do with athletes. It’s about marketing for the University.” Tubbs speculated that of Gardner-Webb's' more than 350 athletes, only about 15 are not receiving any scholarship money. Currently an equivalent of 180 full-ride scholarships can be given out to Gardner-Webb athletes (Equivalent does not mean that all 180 scholarships are given as full rides. They may be divided up amongst the athletes). When full rides are rewarded to athletes, they include tuition, room and board, meal plan and books. Currently, there are no full-ride scholarships available for non- athletic students. “We have to spend money on athletes to compete in Division I,” said Tubbs, who agreed with White that the University is not overspending on athletic scholarships. In fact, they believe the school may be underspending. “We are still spending less [on athletic scholarships] than most schools at this level,” said Please see Scholarships p.2 SGA petition hits stand still The boc makes house calls Emily Killian Pilot staff Before spring break, SGA proposed drafting a petition to represent the complaints and desires of the student body and to present it to the administra tion. Thus far, however, SGA’s petition has not gotten very far. At first, it seemed that SGA was dragging their feet. As of April 10, the presi dent’s office had only been pre sented with a preliminary draft of the petition. “I talked to Dr. White today [April lOJ and he said that he hadn’t seen anything,” said Walter Miller, assistant to the President. According to Miller, SGA only turned in a rough draft directly to him, and White’s office wasn’t presented with the completed document until April 11, at which time he was out of town. Patrick Woody, SGA vice president, dratted the petition. which addresses student con cerns ranging from relations with the administration to the deterioration of classroom and laboratory facilities. The petition spells out stu dent concerns about staff reductions in Campus Ministries, reductions in the Dimensions budget, lack of adequate funds for Student Activities and Development, the library and Residence Life and problems with Academic Advising. Even so, some students are skeptical that the administra tion will act on the petition. “I don’t think it’s going to have a profound effect on Dr. White because students don’t have a profound effect on him,” said junior Charlie Baber. “I believe they [SGA] will submit it though.” As a part of the submis sion, SGA made proposals for the University to promote the Academic Advising department and that they give other depart ments more freedom regarding paperwork and how their funds are spent. In the petition, SGA addressed Scholarship Equality and the possible addition of a Scholarship Coordinator for the University. They hope that by adding a Scholarship Coordinator, there will be a greater number of students awarded scholarships, in an effort to reduce the cost of attending Gardner-Webb and increase the retention rate for the school. The petition also expresses concerns about the perceived lack of administration-to-stu- dent communication, student budgetary concerns and the general feelings of hostility between athletes and non-ath- letes. Woody stated that the peti tion suggests increasing student representation on the Board of Trustees. "We don’t feel like the alumni representatives are adequate,” he said. Photo fay Lm Adam* Doc Watson brought his Grammy Award-winniri}’ coiintry hluegrass soitiuh to Dover Theater on April iS. See stoiy on page 10.

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view