OPINION 7 “1 do not agree with what you have to say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.” - Voltaire Hiings Are Not Always Black and White: Rebuttal Samuel Hemingway, III This letter is a rebuttal to an anicle published in the Lance entitled, “Things are not always black and white.” This information is for all those St. Andrews students who left the club fair without knowing about the Black Student Union (BSU), and were disappointed that students needed their skin color to form a union. Ask yourself the following: Did I speak with the woman at the BSU booth? Did I ask her any questions? If you didn’t then you should have. What is the Black Student Union? What does this organization promote? An important thing to remember, or to become aware of, is that this club does not base its membership on race. It is open to all students enrolled at St. An drews. If the author of the Lance article had asked the above questions, or had. been to any Black Student Union meetings, he would have known what this club represents. This club, to the best of its ability, intends to inform people of the struggles and contributions of African Americans. I cannot help but agree with my colle^ue on certain issues and assumptions but I disagree with my colle^ue on his impression of the Black Student Union and his conception of multiculturalism. Why have such a club? The question can be compared to an other question; Why do I read? The answer would be to become informed. The name black in the title Black Student Union is by no means a way to separate people. However, the name is centralized on what the club studies and focuses. The club promotes knowledge for the sake of knowledge. I am overjoyed that St. Andrews has such a club. When I was in high school we didn’t have a Black Student Union. The only time I was informed about African Americans was during Black History Month in my church. Three Sundays out of the year I was taught black history. In high school, the only time we learned of blacks was in history class, while studying Pre-civil war and Post-civil war periods, and when we examined the Civil Rights movements, where we only focused on Rosa Parks and Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. What if a White Student Union (WSU) was established? Would it be any different fi’om my regular course work that I study daily? Every day I am bombarded with mainstream culture and Euro-centric values. I would be one of the most loyal members of the WSU depending on what it fostered. The author mistakes the club with racial identity, which could have been remedied if he asked questions pertaining to the BSU. The author then begins to fo cus on multiculturalism, which is the doarine that several different cultures can co-exist peacefully and equitably in a single country. The author writes, “multiculturalism is bad for America” and “race and culture are two mitigating faaors.” What if this country, or world had only one worldview? The question sparks my memory to George Orwell’s book 1984. The government of Oceania systematically enforced uniformity, forcing individuals to forsake past history and culture. Our differences are what make us unique but still American. I love all types of music, however, when a nice slow R&B song grabs my ear, I can’t help but get to my feet and dance. To watch the sisters dance at the BSU parties, reminds me of the deep tribal ceremonial dances of Africa. On the opinion of race, 1 agree with Gilbert Abraham: “Race doesn’t exist.” What this means is that in a so-called race you have a variety of complex ions. One white male may be pale and another white male may be tan. Hence, to classify them both as the same color (race) would be ideally unfiiir. I also s^ree with author Toni Morrison, “Race is the most insignificant information to know about a person.” The author of the article, however, writes, “And those with a non-American worldview have as their foundational identity not only in ideas themselves, but in the race of the jserson who holds them.” This open- ended statement implies that racial identity is in collaboration with culture. Race and culture are two very different things, which the author recognizes but doesn’t convey. One’s beliefe, attitudes, and ideas have nothing to do with one’s race. The aa of racism is hatred of someone based on his or her race and race alone. To dislike a person of a particular color because of their opinions, beliefs, and worldviews is not an issue of race, it is an issue of culture. The conflia of worldview is an individual freedom to disagree. To connea one’s worldview to one’s race is to accept that all people of a race think the same. The author also writes a scenario of racial discrimination. A black atheist requesting a leadership position in a Christian church that is predominately white is a situation worth thinking about. The church refuses the black atheist. Can the black atheist sue the predominately white Christian church on racial discrimination? Suing the church would be justifiable if race was used in the decision-making process exclusively. The author is addressing affirmative aaion in this last sce nario. Remember that affirmative aaion is a policy that tries to remedy past and present discrimination through means of equal opportunity in education and employment. As I said before, if the predominately white Christian church denied the black atheist employment based upon his race alone, then grounds for a lawsuit are present. The author writes, “In the multicultural mind’s eye, as a black person, they should think black thoughts, which are assumed to be lib eral or non-Christian.” Here is where the author and I mainly disagree. His conception of multiculturalism is inaccurate. Race has nothing to do with multiculturalism. The appreciation, tolerance, and equity of culture have nothing at all to do with race. People’s aaions are not a produa of their race. If I am a white male who plays basketball like Michael Jordan, am I acting black? Or am I a white male who plays basketball well? If I am a black male who loves wearing Abercrombie and Fitch instead of FUBU and Sean John, am I aaing white? Or am I a black male who just loves wearing such attire? The above statement is again a misconception of multiculturalism because it assumes that multiculturalism views all blacks as both liberal and non-Christian. In disagreeing with the author, I find that the above statement is mirrored as a stereotype and prejudg- ment of blacks. Multiculturalism docs not mean that I think the same way as another black male or female. One black person may believe that ganja (weed) is the coolest thing in the world. Another may believe that it is horrible. One person of a particular race does not represent the entire race. Again, this is not a racial issue. It is one that deals with indi vidual preference. Even if multiculturalism assumes that black persons have black thoughts, which it doesn’t, how in the world were those black thoughts thought to be non-Christian, especially in America? Remember that before slavery, blacks were thought of as being heathens because they did not worship the same God as their white counterparts, which was one reason for society’s acceptance of slavery. Once we were in America, blacks were forced to worship the God of America’s forefathers. Thanks to the bent backs and worn out knees of black ancestry, through their prayers and supplication, an end to slavery was created through the thirteenth amendment. To assume black thoughts are non-Christian is laughable. A Judeo-Christian worldview, which is what many African Americans had been forced to accept, is the same worldview that led to reasons for slavery (The “Curse” of Ham). This so called “curse” is found in Genesis 9: 20-27 when Noah’s son Ham finds him drunk in his tent and sees his ftithers’ nakedness. What people don’t realize is that (a man’s nakedness) in those biblical days meant his wife unclothed. You can find the meaning of this in Leviticus 18: 7-8. However, in Leviticus 20: 11, “to uncover a father’s nakedness” is to lay with his wife. So, Ham had had intercourse with Noah’s wife, his mother. When Noah woke and re alized this, he didn’t curse Ham or his wife, however, Canaan was cursed. Ham’s offspring who are said to be people of dark complexion. I am not against Christianity by any means. My father is a Mis sionary Baptist Pastor so I was in church every time the doors opened because I unlocked them. So, to end my rebuttal I would love to invite each and every member of St. Andrews, regardless of race or religion to the Black Student Union meetings. 1 would also advocate that each stu dent dwell on my and my colleague’s comments and develop your own perception of multiculturalism. Racism, as painful as it is to admit, still exists. The Grey Area: The Difference Between Black and White Gilbert Abraham and Matt Peak Staff Writers The following is an online chat that took place between Gilbert Abraham and Matthew Peak regarding the column and issues brought forth in the first edition of the Lancc. It has been edited for spelling only as per the j^reement between the pair and the Lance editing staff. Gilbert: ok, the best way to start is by bringing up your inai^ural ar ticle in previous Lance Gilbert: what motivated you to write that? Matthew: As I was growing up, I was always taught that racial titles were superficial and not a good way to identify one’s self. Having spent three and a half years of high school in Pulaski, Tennessee, one the birth (continued on page 10) The opinions expressed in the Opinions-Editorials seaion of The Lance are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflea the opinions of The Lance staff or St. Andrews Presbyterian College.

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view