jßetemfaer 11,1992 The Key Policy Individuals speak on how the new after-hours access policy will effect students, faculty and organizations on campus. '■"f; -Physics major Ted Kroll Ted Kroll Guest Writer This semester, Guilford College has been working on a formal policy to regulate access to cam pus buildings, specifically during hours after those of "normal" col lege use. Several views have been expressed in previous issues of The Guilfordian, and now I'd like to compile a variety of opinions to help readers understand the com plete spectrum. The reason that I find this issue important is that I'm a physics major, and my work at Guilford depends on me having access to the basement of King; I will do whatever necessary to maintain access to the labs, computers and data reduction room. When I first heard aboutthe school'snew policy I was angered— why should I sud denly require permission and ex ternal regulation to have access to my work space? Rather than as sume that I understood what prompted this need for an updated access policy, I decided to start asking around campus for other people's opinions. "We have two ways of dealing with the prob lem: prohibit after hours access to every one, or find a way to carefully monitor the people that do have 24- hour access." -Rex Adelberger One of the first people I heard speak about the need for this policy was Physics professor/Quaker yearbook advisor Rex Adelberger. He said: "It is a fact: We do need to worry about security in buildings around the Guilford College cam pus after hours. We have two ways of dealing with the problem: pro hibit after hours access to every one, or find a way to carefully +* 0 -Physics professor Rex Adeiberger monitor the people that do have 24-hour access. This access is cer tainly necessary for some students, I think it's obvious that the people on campus that should control and monitor access is Security." Student Mike Livingston held a clearly different view: "[At Guil ford] we should be able to trust each other. As a Quaker learning community, we should build an environment that fosters personal responsibility. The honor code re quires unconditional honesty of all members of this community; that should mean something. The policy of making Guilford a police state is inconsistent with the objec tive of making it a healthy commu nity." When asked, Union President Scott Thomhill said: "24-hour ac cess to college buildings is truly essential for some students. Union members, WQFS personnel, Pub lication Suite staff, upperclass art majors or any upperclass science majors have too much to do during each 24-hour day—there's just no way to get all of the lab, shop and office work done during 'normal' building hours." I think an access policy is nec essary and believe that the debate lies in what students should have to do to obtain after-hours access. Many of us have expressed a con cern about the $25 deposit required for a student to obtain a key giving them after-hours access to an area. As Rex Adelberger states: "Keys cost money to make, and since we don't live in an ideal society (i.e. people steal/lose keys) a deposit of some sort must be involved. For those who oppose the deposit in cluded in the current policy, they should realize that getting an ac cess card is free — all you need is approval of the advisor/chairper son for that particular area on cam pus: it's obtaining a copy of the key for that area that requires de posit." Chemistry major Lisaßipperton concurs: "The key deposit is a rea sonable precaution; keys on this campus have always cost money. Perspectives 9u Iflß -Senior Mike Livingston People lose keys, and security has a right to assure themselves that there is a deterrent to losing the key." I believe that the key deposit is too high, and definitely cannot cor respond to the real loss suffered when if a key is lost or stolen. It's ridiculous to think that the cost of cutting a single key is that high. It's also unlikely that the school would install new locks in an area if a key were indeed lost or sto len— but what can the school do? Here'sanidea(notmyown): Have students sign a pledge when they are issued a key, explicitly stating that they accept the liability con nected with the area to which they are being given access. "The policy of making Guilford a police state is inconsistent with the objective of making it a healthy community." -Mike Livingston Certainly, the entire process of obtaining after-hour access seems more like a privilege rather than a right. Some of us want to know why. Scott Thornhill pointed out: "There are other people working on this campus that have 24-hour access to buildings and don't get hassled about it— college staff/ faculty members. It'sas if somestudents (and other college officers) are getting pun ished for doing more work (which requires them to need more access time in college buildings/facili ties.)" In the Letters section of the November 6 issue of The G uilfor dian, Butch Arthur argues: "Ac cessing buildings after-hours must be a privilege granted to specuic students. If all students could ac cess buildings by right at all hours, then no building would have 'after-hours' periods. The access policy seems designed, in part, to address the needs of students who needed access to areas after-hours W -Union President Scott Thomhill because 24-hour space was not available." I disagree. I require access to King Hall because it contains the equipment and specific physical space that I need to get my work done. If all I needed to do was study, I'm sure that I could find space in Bauman to suit that need. What can we do for a biology major who's working on a lab in Physics (required by their depart ment) when a security officer wants to kick them out because they don * t have access to the specific floor of King in which they're working? What happens to the art student (non-major) that needs to have ac cess to the Hege-Cox shop, but doesn't want to lay out the $25 deposit to get a key for the semes ter? |r', 'M > 1 think 'ii% somewhat Indicative that you can get a BS in | pottocal science/ Ms department ;,| .-vl? "USA Today- the newspaper for whom television Is too complicated..* -Dick Morton ■ "Sex Is good, but it ain't worth dying over- unless yooVe had something I atnt had! " -The Condom Udy "You have to see a human side to the statistics/ -Kevin Drury on KiV/AIDS Hon. Hf>w about do your love ttfe a favor and leave me a message," PartkU yPOgTI {Kbe t&uiltortrian Photo by Carl Beehler -Chemistry major Lisa Ripperton If a Union member is elected to office, why can't their deposit be waived and their costs absorbed by the school as part of the student government budget? None of these questions can be easily answered, but hopefully this article will help to get some of you to think about how this policy af fects you. Security and the Safety Advisory Committee has yet to come up with a final version of the policy and, in fact, the only copy of the policy I could get was dated August 27, 1992. Perhaps the final version will satisfy most of our access needs here at Guilford, but if we just sit back and let the policy get written for us some of us will most cer tainly be misrepresented. 5

Page Text

This is the computer-generated OCR text representation of this newspaper page. It may be empty, if no text could be automatically recognized. This data is also available in Plain Text and XML formats.

Return to page view