This page has errors The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content This page contains sensitive or offensive material
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page.
0 / 75
'o ‘■C' of the ability to see the 'Jorld in other ■ than political hues, is not lost sight of. If those uho are grappling to save the poo people do not ’nave a clear sense of them selves as huiiian beings, then the revolu tion is Trorthless—and ’.‘hile the leaders may be capable and politically astute, they uill not be human, and in the end may be as mechanistic as their predecessors. The revolution must not be a revolution of death, ending in a totalitarian police state. Only the revolution of life can liberate. I.h. T.5 liluNO 13 -'5- -'r- R/LDICi'Jb J?f.;UiSRS LIST (CPS)—A controversial report listing honorariums paid to 63 alleged radical ihe list of o3 speakers printed "i n the report uas culled from the names of l,l68 speakers furnisheo b/ the colleges and un iversities that replied. ihe report said tlu nai.ies "uere researdiad "to ascertain uliether individuals of the same names had been identified as members, or participants in the activities of Com munist, Communist-front, or CoiiiLmni st.-in- liltratec or; anizations, militant, radical, or ej-.tremesu groups, self-proclaimed re volutionaries or provided public support jto such groups and organizations." 1 The list included such predictable 'names as Jerry Ruibin and Renoie Davis of the Chiccfo Seven, as veil as the names of persons not generally considered extremists such as the author Jessica Hitford^ Floj'-d campus speakers has been filed hith Congresi-fcKissick, the former national director despite a federal district court order ban-Qf the Congress of Racial Squallty, and ning its official publication 'r' the gov ernment . The report, based on information providetf' Some of those mentioned on the list John Ciardi, poetr7/ editor of The Saturday ievieu. by 93 colleges, concluded that if a sampl^jhave protested their inclusion, including ing of only 3zp of the nation’s higher ed-jpjst Hentoff the author and critic, uho ucation institutions could turn up honor- plaintiff in the ACLU suit. He said ariuras to alleged- radicals totaling nearlyjhe iras not a member of any of the three „-109,000, "the campus speaking circuit is |organizations the report listed him as certainly the source of significant financ-being affiliated uith—the Socialist ing for the promoters of disorderly and revolutionary activity among stuidents," librkers Party, the Students for a Demo*. ' era tic Society, or the Spring liobiliza- Rep. Richard H. Icliord (D-iiO.) filed, thetion Committee to And the Ear in Vietnam, repart of "his house Committe on internal I Daniel Jatts, editor of Liberator Iiag- Jecurity and released copies to the press,|azin(^ also denied that he had any af- even though a U.3. District Court judge had enjoined government printers and the committee staff from distributing the report. Judge Gerhard A, Gesell said he issued a temporary restraining order barring government publication of the report on grounds that publication of the list of speakers had no legislative purpose and u/ould violate the speakers ’ First juaend- ment rights. He set a full hearing later this month on a suit filed b the /'imerican Civil Liverties Union. The report of the House committee Ties based on replies to letters sent to 177 coleges and universities last spring ask ing t’em to lest speakers other than re cognized academicians and lecturers irho had appeared on their caiapuses during the past tTTo acadrnic years. They also •■./ere asked to list hou' much the s'peakers uere paid and by uhom. filia-bion ud'bh the Socialist l.'orkers Party, Charles Garry, a San Francisco lairjrer uho has re-presented Black Panther clientsdenied any affiliation 'vith the Black Panther Par-by or the Conmiunist fsvtj of the U.S.A. The report said that of the 177 in stitutions contacts, 13^ replied. It said 32 provided all the information re quested, 27 geve partial inforruation, l6 replied by had no speakers other than re cognised academicians, 28 said adminis- tra'tive problems kept them frpm com plying uith the request, Ij. asked for more tir.ie, and 7 insti'butio.is refused "for philosophical reasons." CHfRIL n. FIEE)S TI-ES HIPPIE G.CHEFulTIOK (PTeus Analysis) r".„ Jhat do today’s youth uant? Ghat do ue i dement? P'hat are ue rebelling against? I I think it's time u'e considered both
