North Carolina Newspapers

0 1 f-tSff y ' 1 I . 1 .: V jaa.- J T ,!,' -5.,' , -'.No. 18 , (ir. c. fbidAy, Arniii tb.Us ; 'Vol. XVI ( f ' - : THE 8TAR,- -fai J&rik'CanUna Gazelle, - ' 'r tH-hawwlly,Vy ; B ELI, k LAWREN CE," Srt-itrrt. 7 ""S? par will Ws aewt. without " rwat ft' K ia awJ ' f dTe, w4 -T 4Moatiae4, ! al 7 Oil apt of the Wiwi,ikill aiT-awsa a.iiiiwta. Ml f- teen wnj IKSCrtea IWVVW war ! tty five fer awatianaar All Irttm te tha editeri sat be af paid. State cf North-Carolina. -erw At to lfc a.t uwnii a -m rrkM of th Stork. y r . Trer 4 VatdaWo Property for sale, IV rnnitlk nny, NnrlU Crolii, W (mcTnct of 1000 crr H Um, o Cf- IMM tk On tHMt of 400 rm Tmliw.in Ctarkt on of eHy 800U, ou J)anl I'ntl r4 iHe wtr of GrM7 teek Thr lnrr.W TfMI f Lsml bT thiion on rth of tln-m, fa tolrbl pd replr TU l. "re M vork ira bandt on, to MlMgej tKo Hn.'. . orl KmH lb W rirbt or thf 4th nffielet IS or 18 hMl. lfc lHrr Im tjrownent n reh plwiliHion, rr lolrrallc too. filwiM WWinw ieninl.) fcclirT- . d thai tlx OrWdi nm two Ibe nieri ro ... more nluUle nJ cooUln morr Fimt Trero kBnf herlw plmiWtroM in u w mmy.n , whk nkBon to tr efrj Jrw. Om of Uie tbOTt TreU of Und Wi wkWn or 7 mil. of fhfhrd the oh'r three tr M tn Ur Nonu Wntera part of th County. n. -i I ... Mtil ia the mint . Kaillhv nart of Graortllr. aHnilt a pirnty oi exoellent tpringa and other eouremeni atrrama f water. , Tk aoil well adapted tath eoltupe of Corn, ToUmo, Wbeat, Cotton, tt. and mj juelW be raakeil with the valaable Lanrta of .il County Tka Plantaliooa ar In gnwl orilition for ma Wng a am tka cnaaing rr. Pertona Inclined te ftarahaaa ara requeHod to eaaminr the prem ilea, and aatiafy themaeWea. 1 he itibaeriber or Samuel 8, -Downey, Baij. living In the upper part of Granville, will ahow the property, and luke known the termfc TbeeroprCoro an! ,. L. t Iijimm Vt nTu. (,mtlm til' Bopgi, on two of he above plantation, are for b- aUu a very valuable Jitek al three Jen nrva, raiaed front the moat apiroved oek. two ofibe above Traeta of Land will be ex whanged for Weatern Land. ;. 6 M.0KICR SMITH. Notice To the njfictr and Soldiers of the Re volutionary I far, in the A'orth Car oliaa iJir.- and to the heirs of r' who hart nut a y f obtawl the ' portion vf Lands due to them J-r such militant rrvces. S eovenienee to audi elairaaatamony of bon through old age, rouat be in a meauif mi- able tn travel to Kal Ir". logetber wnn me wi-e- etand opinions oTiereml tnftntmiai ana in formed turn, atxru the utility of the eautblith- meni oi an otrnx in inn buj. w - Im-.h. &. nr.lt rUAmm can be received and put J train for lepl Inveatitgalioa, ao aa to have fttini iwinllinllt rfMlpil HI. ' 1 ha aubteriber hving So Malcigh. nflVra hi provisional aervieeaaa n Attorney, W tall per. aoai o aituatcd, and nromiaea to nttand to, and put all alaima tranamitted to him, mpported by affiilnvMi. in mitt tor adinilieatioa by I Ho Cnni- tn'mionera to whom, the aul'jeet laa ben rt ftp. red by the lait enrl APfmoiT w ftnn ' ' Carolina. and whoae doeiiion owm all flainw aub' milled tb them agreeably to (aw, will b' 6iml, .aeeordinff to the nroviiinna of the abow eiled aet of the last aetsion, eooiliiuurg them a ISoard for tbU porpove. ' " :r Aa the act aknmr wited f the lart acaaion eon atitming the.aW Boanl, lor lle adjudication f l all anch eiaimi, will etpirr on the first of July lieit, and the anlijeet lie at reat for ever fter. pcnoni aitTimg to avail tliemaeive ix me . aeribcr'a offer, and nrafcaMonal aervicea, will ap. w nl aa ioon nnmtihle. an mm eive tinie to have " ; their several claimi malurtly eonaidelfed, and de- . iua!ratciylS(jU(lieatetl, ,; r y- " ' ' s' He further inlonna those intereated m aneh lairoa, that he ha made tuch ai rangenicuta ilb tenllemen f intelliH-nee. nd Intesiitv,' aa will enable- him to have any Lamia they ahall oUaH . kwated. or mI,hUa jtUnmpd f io the beat ad vantage for a proportion ofVither lle Lauda or The Mbaeriber will wprct every application In him on the n.hWt aeeoinlianicd by niot'er -ate fee, and delivered at bit office in l:leiiiUvfie i'vC Rakteh.Jafc th l2S.lW -t r; ld-f X 0. Every fMid'Mawt ffratf atatd" tl C5on. but ami Mi..Lt K mticteri and aerved in, tile inie of the Cnptuin and Colonel, the length of time hetcrmJ, and where, and the affidavit of anttie periona wbo arraert with Hiem am peraon ally knew them to have Mrvrd. 1 h heira muat . rp O-.e aerricca ic ihe aanoe iiy of the aneea- Just Published,1; t HRACHRD- Wniro tW Bible SoetetT of - Jl north i;nrlii,on me iwn oi ueerow, Uil. bv Ibe Ricbt Ker'd Jahm 8. Jtavetucrtfl, t&boa gf the oioacae of North CarotiM aaworo- twen wiih an appendix.' ., frkto SO went fannary S8, 1885.. v: t Y Donlca and ataounU are plaeed In tbe H I liaoda of Mr." Alex. J. Larwe,-n ot lae rhtaiaof tli tr, to whom Ukm SuatwO willUf ia mVa imrwnl. 1 HUB. aJC.AUe-uawiil, U-lm i-H?: it," J.. - V. -:s& Sale, the Jm0jpce,$he. v,;;" CEX. EATuX & SIR. CLAY. , rwai ate "ktiial tjrClftmtir. Vraarm. UUt h taaTwax .. Vaj are requested to jmbliah in the Inttllierocer the encloea letter, ex planttorj of the metaina; wkidi ahould attach to particular exprrtsioDt contaia ed la llr. CuitV Ad Jm to hia Can titaenU. Beapecirallr; JNOH. K.T0N. H 'tkingfn, ?S4 MarrJk. 1825. 8ibj In the National Journal of tbia anom inr, over your aigwattire, I find my name in troduced with tba fonoartnt; reaaarkat " A few day after tba tMibUcatioa of my card, another card, under Mr. Kramer name. i pubrithed in the Inteuireacer . Tbe night before, aa I waa voluntarily informed, Mr. Eaton, a Senator Iroaa Tenneaaeo, and the biographer of Gen. Jackaon, waa cloortted lor aoano time with lum. I pretend not to know tbe object of Ur. Eat on 'a visit to him. I arate the fad at it waa communicated to me, and leave you to judge. Mr. Kremcr'a card ia eompoeed with eotne care, and no lit tle art: and he ia aaoaV to avow in it, though aomewhat equivocally, that he it the author of the letter to the Editor of the Columbian Observer. To Mr. Crowninahield, a Member from Maaaachinetta, formeriv Secretary of the Navv, he declared be waa not the author of that letter." Tbe imputation which your phraseology would seem to convrv, ia, that the letter which appeared in tlie Columbian Observer, and acknowledged by Mr. Krenter, waa not rttrn bv him, but waa in fact written by me; and that by aae be waa made to avow hiinaelf, though aomewhat equivocally, the author. Tour Unguagw. and meaning are ao:newhat equivocal tooi but aa by fair interpretation they appear to warrant tbia construction, I present myaelf before you, to require vou distinctly to state whether, or not any auch meaning waa by you deaigned to be convey ed. It' thia be the idea intended to bo com municated, I will not persuade myaelf but that at least you are possessed of facta and circumstances to fix against me the opprobri ous charge ot writing a letter, which, as the nference muat be, I waa not merely afraid to acknowledge, but which, through finesse, arrangement, and cloaet management, I had caused to be avowed by one, who waa inno cent of producing it. I have the honor to be, respectfully, your moat ob't. JNO. H. EATON. Hon. MtjriT Ciav, Sec' y tf State. Wathinttn, 30th March, 1825 Sia: Your letter, under date the 28th tnst waa handed to me yeaterday. After referring to an Address of mine to my late Constituents, published in tne National Journal of Monday, and from which you quote certain passages, jou uuKirr, -ne imputation un.C.t your phraaeology would aeem to convey is, that tne letter which appeared in tne Columbian Observer, and acknowledged by Mr. Kremer, was not written by him, but waa in fact writ ten by mc, and that by me he waa made to a vow himself, though somewhat equivocally,' the author. Your language and meaning are aomewhat equivocal too; but as by fair inter pretation they appear to warrant this con' struction, I present myself before you, to re. quire you distinctly to state, whether or not any auch meaning was by you designed to be conveyed." In the pan of my Address to which you re fer, naving stated a particular tact respecting you, I observe, I state the fact as it was communicated to me, & leave you to judge." I cannot, tbereiore, admit vour right to call on me tor my liuerencea tram a fact which I have submitted, to my constituents, leaving thtm to draw tneir own conclusion. But, in the spirit of frankness, which has ever guided pie, I nave no Hesitation in stating that, in re- rrd to the letter in the Columbian Observer. I have not formed, and therefore did not in tend to intimate, any opinion of the person who was its real author. I waa satisfied to take Mr. Kremer's declaration, that he was not the author of the letter, aa made to the late Secretary of the Navy. In the same spirit ot frankness, however, it is proper for me to add, that 1 did believe-. from yctir nocturnal interview with Mr. K. referred to in my Address, that you prepared or uuviscfi me jniuucsuum ui uis caru in uie guarded terms in which it is expressed. 1 should be happv, by a disavowal on your part of the fact of that interviewer of its sup posed object, to be able to declal-e, as in the event of such disavowal 1 would take pleasure in declaring, that I have been mistaken in supposing that you had any 1 agency in the composition or publication of that card. . i imve me uonor to oe, your obedient ser rant, .. , .. .. . n. clay. Thenon. JoBjr B. Eatqit, . . . r -1 ' Waehintrton. March 31,1825. '" Bra: Your letter in answer to mine, wal re. eeived at 4 o'clock yeatetdarj from the delay. I was disposed to think you had concluded not to reply. .' .." ; ., ,, Oh reading joti communication to 'your late constituents, I naa unaersxooa you as in-tT,':!ip- to convey the idea, not bv ' infer. etiix- f nm a fact;' but almost by actual averi me;.;, that the letter published in the Cohmv biini Obaerver was written by me; and that, to escape "or avoid responsibility, by me, Mr. Kremer was. made to acknowledge himself its author: yovr reply to (ny letter disavows tJiis, and states that " vou hare not formed: ad therefore did not intend to intimate, any opin ion of the person who was jts real antbor, be ing satisfied to take Mr! Kremer's declaration that he was ribt the author of the letter, as made to the late Secretary ofthe Navy."; , Having nothing to do with tiiil Controversy, further than as I considered thejntroduction of my name intended personally and directly to affect myself, 1 might omit any notice of the concluding part of your remark as deriv ed from Mr. Crowninshield, late Secretary of the r.avy. -sin Ji;stce, nowever, to an aoini individual with whom my aame has been as sociated, I shall not forbear tbe opiniun, that Mr. Kremer acver did use the language, im- i j pitted to him. It is a ifJaie an thiug but lacfcaad, vitftoot UtsAtfing w wjcnbo.tSa error twyww, 1 cawaa tb ngwl of avyiag, tbwt reaaoa rrrwau at law tdwa, laal a akaid kav aaado Mr. CrowwiaabieU kaa ewaaVawar, aatd to bin tittered a mnguafc, at arar watt he pwwae aa4 rrpaalai pnratc dcoWxtiOwa aaaia to hia tciewda. .: . Tb eowcXidW paragraph of yeaf- letter erpreeaeaa be Del that 1 prepared, ar advia ed, the p wdicaAioaiof km (Mr Ka.)tard, ia the guarded terasa ia which it iaaaptaudi aad yam dc'ww Twajraeef rowdy to aAnowi. edge the v Ak.e, it' I will offer any disavow al , ( If yoo had properly reflected aata Jutt b tonged to court evy, you would hawougvt frooi me in(hranatioa) about thia oeire my name was introduced be for the pu$c, aad n be lief formed. You knew m avicWnt ell, to believe that 1 would wot Recline candidly to answer auy iaquinea aeeaaary and proper to be made. This was M doae; but on the infhrmatioii you bad rrC ed, vou yielded it your confidence, awd proeided to a defence before the public. VTitkwjt te tending to be understood, as either almktinr or denying any thing respecting mr imputed visit to Mr. Kremer, on tne evcaiwg preced ing the publication of hia card sonpoae the fact to be, that I did viait hia aad suppose too, that it was, aayou have terned it, a noc turnal visit." waa thwre any thing exiating tnat should bave dented me uis prwJegef or does it therefore necessarily result, that I ahould have been engaged in tny pint against vour righta, or consmracy aganat vou' There ia no one more interested Uin yourself in denving the force of conclusion aa derived from circumstance; and it ia a littfc strange, that hile, in your own case, you should obt ject to it, aa a rule of proper applitation, you ahould at the same time claim it as rightfully entitled to operate in the case of others. You will excuse me from making an at tempt to remove any belief, which you en tertain upon this subject h as a matter Which gives me no concern. In the communication made to you, mv object was to ascertain, dis tinctly, your meaning as to the letter publish. ed in tbe Columbian Observer, and to that you have frankly replied. Had you referred to me five davsacn, on thia subject, I should with pleaureave answered you; but having exhibited your belief and opinions to the public, I am precluded from any exnhjnatien you have no right to aak it; nor 1 in justice to yourself any right to give it. ) Kespecluily, your obed't serv't. JNO. H.EATON. Ilotl. II. Clat, Secretary Slate. Wathinsrion. lit JpriL 1825. Sir: I received yesterday your note of tbe 31st ultimo With respect to mine in answer to yours of the 28th (in your reception of which ypu aeem to think there waa some de lay,) allow me to remark, that it was my in tention to have dispatched it through a friend, who, when I sent for him, happened to be out of the City: in consequence of which I dispatched it through another channel; that, amidst My official, wngagwanants. I cannot mark the hours with the same precision as a gentleman can of your presumed leisure; that I received your own note, the day after it bore date; and that, by your own admn aiou, you received my note at 4 o'clock of the day aucceediiig that on which yours waa de livered. Whilst you disclaim having any thing to do with the controversy into wnicii i nave been most reluctantly drawn by out rs, under Mr. Kremer's name, you have chosen to observe, entirely in justice to that gentleman, that he never used the language to which Mr. Crow ninshield testifies; M toat.it ia a mistake; any thing but tact;" and to claim tbe nght of say ing " that rraaon revolts at the idea, that he should have made Mr. Crowninshield his con fessor." Why thiaJolicitude to defend Mr. Kremer? Why question ' the' credibility of Mr. Crowmnshieldf He Has sot claimed to be rvaewar of Mr. K.. a term the religious associations with which might have suggest ed to you the propriety ot abstaining from its use, whatever occasion he may have fur the office. The American public is the best judge, whether a gentkman of Mr. Crowmn shield's well known character, fur honor, pro bity, ana verciy hsi Jaiaeiy testmed, or Mr. Kremer has been prevailed upon to avow himself the author of a later which he never wrote. In regard to your polite intimation, that 1 bad not properly reflected upon what belong ed to courtesy, I bave two observations to make, the first of which is, that 1 am yet to be made sensible of any particular claim that you bave upon tne for aiveitraordinary oh servation of its rules; and the second is, that when 1 may think 1 shall have occaaion to learn them, I shall not be tempted, even by a gratuitous offer, to renounce my indisputa ble right to choose my owa preceptor. - 1 made no demand upoa you for an expla nti w rh obi wet of your interview with Mr. Kremer, the night preceding tbe pus, cation of his card. The privilege of any one to derive from bis society whatever .tantoy. menu it can afford, literary, scientific, or po litical, was never contested, aa at never will be envied, by me.; My intention was to af ford you au opportunity of making an expla natiau of the object of your visit to him, if youchbse 'to do so, (In declining it, I acqui esce entsreiy in your aeicnainauon. . . I have the honor to be, your obedient ser vant. -.. , Oi &. B., CLAY. The Hon, Jour. II. Eitoit, Jhe. &c. 4ic ..... .. .... ... . ... 8ii Your letter of yeaterdayia received. A s ' there is nothing, no w cf inquiry or argu ment between tu, 1 might toroear ottering a re ply t but, from a desire 14 correct apme ter version given both to. the meaning and ex pression' of any laat'commtinlcafioa to youl 1 shall notice but one ef them. . 1 did not assert that Mr. Kremar never used thelaiiguage impute to him by you, aa de rived from Mr. Crowninshield; it ia riven as matter of belief only. l ta"Kt forbear the jopl nion," ia tbe expression used, accompanied by a tun and sufficient reason war mat opin ion could not be incorrect; and that your informant muat be mistaken.'. It .waa unne cessary for you to talk of Ur. Crovainahiekl's honor and veracity tome. . I entertain as high sracuywroe. . leTucnainasmgnianuaiiy uuvuni, icanax u luieren'Ttributed to him i that buhlirathia ' i -"i ll sTtlnaamc Kt" 10 the ylw f Sir. Cla bntSvcr1: Wit 5 not like i- M ; ; ' . ;. -in.'..... .:. ". . ' - ... 1.. . ..r " ' '1... "' : ., . . .. . -. ... ..-..- i . . ..... .-; - t - an opinion or them mistaken, I hare aoaaore doubt than 1 aaa that Mr, Kresaer it akw a correct man. Hia d-fTanng wttb yw Can asworetUy not sender aimaVwttcrsjrwTorao aa sash re of aweiwty. I admit, anoat chasrlully. that hav , ionjaueotnwy,aa4 a-ayntroru. barvance of ataruiew." I L , this rasped, on no ones eecietv. not mcv ereatea the cJnisn, and baa Inns; aiace esOb hd atnongst her subjects, that hers are rules every where in aWsion, end ahrmya u be regwdrd. 1 am a kttW surpriswd, that you should claim to enter any protest against them, wiule yon evince auch warmth of re gard for the cathoCe principJ of coneaaion. Permit me to assure yeau that wtth aneh avearalshefere me.l have not the Veat desire to question "your indisputable right to choose your own DreceDtor ." For the privilege conceded by you of vial, ting Mr. Kremer, and of deriving- -fton hia oaeiy wnaicver enjoymetita it can afford, literary, scientinc, ee noUtleal," 1 aught to feel graietoi, bowerrr i may nana to express my gratitude. Mr. Kremer ia considered an ho nest mam he bears with him. evwnr where. thMtwsmiatiamaA. wbilat he bears It. i fait company tor any one, alUMugh he may not. nae nise ooin, aim to aawume any gioas ap. pearancv, or to past for any thing bey end a real value. Respectfully, your most obedient, JNO. 1L EATON. Hon. n. Cur, Secretary of State. GEN. SWARTWOUT k MU. CLAY. From the New York American, of April S, i o we Exiuora. Genllemen.n tho. letter of Mr, Clay, published in your paper of the Slat ult. 1 find the following passages:" Mr teuer to juuge orooae waa puoiunea in Uie napera in thia titj, (Washington, on tne lin reuruary. me Ucneral note necnninz tne invitation ot air. Swartwout and otliera, to a dinner, waa Jubluhed on the 14th in the National ournal. The probability therefore is that he (Mr. swartwout) did not leave the city until h had a fulroppurtunity 1 to receive in a perional interview wit! the General any verbal observations un- on it wntcn ne mijritr nave luount proper to make. The letter to Mr. Swartwout bear dat- the 22d Feb. If received by him, it must have reached him on the 25th or 26th. Whether intended or net 'a nmvftls. rAmmiiniriihiin " an A nnt us aaHW v .iii ui va ai wi.t'ii fill 4 UUl for the public eyc,"asal!edredir hiin. there ia much probability in believing that its publication on the 4th of March was then made, like Kremer's address, with a view to its arnval tn this city in time to after' 'ifv nomination to the Se nate. In p in of fact it reached here the day before 'he Senate acted on that nomination." It may be true, as Mr. Ctay itates, that his letter to Judge Brooke was pub lished in Washington on the 12th, and Oen. Jackson's note declining; the din ner on the I4th February; and yet not true, as ne insinuates, tnat " l did not leave the city until 1 had a full impor tunity to receive in a personal inter view with the General, any verbal ob servations upon it, which he might have thoujrht proper to make." I left Wash ington on the morning of the 1 3th of February; but I never Jiad a word of conversation with General Jackson at any time upon the subject of that letter. I did not sec the General to converse with him during the day of the 12th February. In the early part of (he e- vening, when 1 intended to have paid my respects to him, he had gone to vi sit Mrs. Decatur, and when, between 9 and 10, 1 did call to bid him farewell he had retired. I repeat again that 1 ne ver had any verbal communication with him upon the ssbject, nor any corres pondence, excepting that contained ia a letter which 1 wrote to hiin on the 17th or IS th of Feb. in which I spoke warmly and pretty freely id the injus tice and want of analogy of Mr. Clay's strictures upon the Gen. in his letter to Judge Brooke. ' The Iettelof the Gen. was read by me on fuu 25th f 26th, as cojiier tored by Mr. Clay and at aa im - sMeHsubaiyrtuereaiter, shown to several persons, who, upoa reading it. declared it 4 platn aad temperate vindication of; nimseii, ana expressed a strong desire to see tt in print. I determined, there fore, to have it published; but without reference to the. particular time or, the effect which Mr. Clay supposes was'in tehded. ,! If Gen. Jackson derigncd it for pubueaUoD,uwa8 certainly unknown io roe ne gave no sucn intimation ; to me, in the letter or otherwise, althoagh he had a perfect rijht to do ao. Injus tice to Gen. Jackson, I must add, that 10 making the letter public, without his authority, I trusted to hia indulgence. .'should Mr, Ulay other, statements and inferences reat aponno betterbun dation, feeble most, be the effect of his elaborate conclusions., I ahould not consider It at all neces sary to vindicate Gen. -Jackson's right to repel a slander to cocyrse with ma and write to me1 too, and that tor pub lication, upon , this or any other subiect but, I. feel it to be tny doty to Mate me facta in weir true; jigni, anu as they aciuaur occurred, leaving an inieren to Uk jattlce of our fe'Iovr-cU'rr at, tl - whosa . decision Gea Jackson and bis friends are ever ready la submit. : saMvaL SwiaTwocT. .8, 'iTha invitation ta tie dinner was rivtate Geaw Jack soaoa the lC4h TTebraarv. the dav after dhe electn. which At decayed tntht tamt day., Tktr publication of Jthe Notea, ia a rtew$r.a per, could not therafinw have any t! r . to da with my stay -in Washington, ur departare from it, . : - .S. S. ; V. Trim AtttUtni lUfwiVsrV " TIIK NASHVILLE FORGERY - Wa altall see wh'elherlU tha paper. ' . which have emn currency to this infa ' V w moas libel oa .Gen. Jackson, will .haw candour enough to publish the contra diction which it receivea from the fotv wins; letters frivm NaahvilU.- It aoW" appears beyond the JvvssiVilitjr of cava, hat this miaerabCe Mnpeaution Lis nnxf appeared to tha V NaahviUaWhi:.'--; W here then did It ' onnnater aiiA onh paper In which It has yet been seen ia tht " Western Cottrier,w bublisheil , m the Town or Charleston, in ha nan ha , county, Virginia. .. From , tbia, , th . Richmond papera conted itnd, thus - it flew throughout the whole country as soon as we aospectea tnat it aa a forgery, va attempted to; expiata th L injustice of which we, had been-tha la ; ,f nnoent in jtrumrnta we ixmcaa . it to f the ' Western Courier. and va call ed upon him for hia auth6rity Thu V ' - V Editor of the Courier saya as iUlowst f TU WaikviUeLctttrs-Th Editors wf tho ' , v RUhmnd Enevirtr pronounces the Nash I, k villa Letter" a fabrication. : In common .with. . ' . c other newspapers, wa have Inserted f V ''t ' did not note the paper from which, it waa copiedi nor have we heard Its .authenticity questioned by any cicept the Enquirer. If it ne a launcation, lAfy bare tne tame light ' that we have. In their paper of tha 23d ult. X aad In n letter addressed by them to' this place, which we hav seen, they nor than -insinuate that the article in question Vis an original communication in thia paper. ' W pronounce the suspicion false. ' - ' - 4 It was not an original communlca. tion" in that paper, we call upon ita Editor to spare no pains, to lose n timer, in tracing it to its origin. It baa ne.-; vcr appeared in tha NtahvilU'WhigC. mat ia ciear, ; ii in any oiaer. rmDer. -; what paper? No body else haa aeenj , that paper, aa far as we can . learn, but J. y. himself. Not an Editor in the East or " West, iat the North ier ia the 8oth has seen any such paper, but (he afore5f said Editor, of, the,. Western Courier; We call upon him, then, in the oami ' of truth and justice, to point out th; paper from which he copied tJiil ycfav' mous production. -t,hins,fan8acBtv: his whole file of western exchange pa - pcrs, ana apply to eacn ol . them for information. If ha does not in, Tuo time satisfy the publio on this subject, let tnem ue assured that they will be- -lieve this. Lamous letter to have been art oritrinnl rrnnminLrtfinn lav hia . and he will hava to bear, the conser'' quencea or sucn an impflitauon.1 Uuri correspondent from Kanawha alludes . - to a source, to which; this letter has V' been ascribed, but he yeheniently pro- i v tests against such an -allegation, andi i we shrink, ourselves, from making the slightest mention of iit s . f H; ' IH aniTpna ot raf SYttfiss. jtatitUOe. Jtbril 3d. lfdS. . : ' Gettlenem In your naner of tha 15th uttL mo, is published a very extraordinary article, ' V! ,w m mil K.vwi UI a JCllCr iruin "i an officer, formerly of tt Southern- Army, and having for its obiec. a detailed account ' of a conversation said to bave taken place between the writer and Gen. Jacksmv tart full, relative to tho presidential Electkirf, The Nsbvi! Wbif, paper pubiwhed . m this town, haf the credit of having Origin), i ally publiahed this article. This I am incli- .' ned to think, sir, is a mistake, as no tuch com- ,t muaicatlon has ever teen seen in that paper . Aer by any of Gent Jackson', friends. If it -; had made its appearance here It would hsva : ; been immediately attended to, and the vile . ': calumniator, whoever he may be,, ferretted IT' ous ano eaposto te pubno, eiecrattoa. The v.-wwp&.-rcz.t whole of the circumstances alluded to in toaV'f&VT'-. I cvttaetiaa most wicked and mafic-ions Cbri. iiXfLc cation, and got lin to sustain the sinking fo . rt3 'i; - ? tunes of Henry Clay, and to nroduccif now ? V r.;r:: sible, a reaction in. his favor- in the Westers States by intlucing a belief that the General iA had himself brought out for the Presidency i ; - f. s 1 to cut up bis (Clay's) interest in the West. ' ' , f .1 to converse upon the subject of the Presi dential Election even tolus.most intimate j and confidential fricndi, nd never without ; . its first having been introduced by them: it T not likely then that he would have unbosom, ed himself,; at a publ:e house, to one with whom, at best, h could have been but par tially acquainted. 1 believe I am personally acquainted with .almost vetyofSecer of th Southern Army, in whom the General would t have reposed such' confidence, and I know." of none whose jiame begin with IL Not k only this, but 1 have myawlf been personally ; aud intimately acquainted with the Gen. for ; many years, and havenorioubt he has com J wiuwcaUd as freely and as unretmedly with me upon all .subjects as any other, peiaoa) , -hinff and 1 tlo most s tlemnly declare that ; I never hse hca,1 him, at any time Or un j; def any tiicumrnnce v expres such senti- ntents or any thin; Lke them, a are at- r - 1- w v.. V - I if ' : i y "; ' v'- . . . "".'.t'.-V,--... p.t ... -.