Newspapers / The North-Carolina Star (Raleigh, … / July 28, 1826, edition 1 / Page 1
Part of The North-Carolina Star (Raleigh, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
it. vk RALEIGH, (N. C.) FlUDAT,' -ULY s; 185." VoLXVlI- the stXb, .!a4 AVa-Conrfia Kaie Cazttte, raib.vkiT.v BELL &. LAWRENCE. taise lotion, threa doHaTa vrf UM. fo p- H, VH U MM iUOBl St IKH s tdrnM, sad ee spanl.eoaiioe4. HI (ka 4auS tbs Kliora,ilsasrl arresrarn .r, paHj. . MimiwwH, eoi einswns; treatises, Inssttn le tiss Toe o nollsr tsstoeaty aveeeMsforesch coatinosnee- All teller 10 the editor mo V M Paid power. Tom Ae National fnttUigtncer. TO THE EDITORS. Onslow's respects to Messrs. Gales L Seaton. and again requests the in dulgence of being heard through their naocr- tie encloses two nnmoera id reply to Patrick Uenry'a last number, and he would b gratified with an early insertion. Onslow sensibly feels the prompt at tentioa of Messrs. Gales & Seaton to his fwmer Communication. Fairness required that it should have appeared in the Journal, through which the attack ws made. He did not anticipate that a calm. aud artrutnentative defence of the second officer of the Government, on a subject so deeply interesting to the People of the United States as every inquiry must be, which touches on so vital a point in our system, as the free dom of debate, would be excluded from a pUce in the Journal. Yet, so it was and he now more deeply feels the injus tier, since Patrick Henry, availing him self of that exclusion, has replied in the game paper -not to his arguments in their real character, but as unfairly represented by himself. Whether the course indicates a sincere desire to ar rive at truth on a subject which has excited much interest, or feelings of a political or personal hostility, the Ame ncaa People must judge. No. I. If rumor miy be credited, I may be proud in having vou as in antagonist: and if I were actuated by a sentiment of vanity, much of my reply would be devoted to tracing tne Strong, out, perhaps, accidental analogy, be tween the style of your numbers and some of our public documents. But truth, and not the gratification of vanitr, ii my object; and though the pride of victory would be swelled in proportion to the high standing of an op ponent, I shall, without stopping to nKuire into tho question of authorship, piltjfed directly to the point at issue. It you have tailed in your argument, you have at least succeeded in giving the question a new and interesting aspect. You hsve abandoned the rules and usages of the Senate, as the source of the Vice President's author ity, as the presiding officer of the Senate, Tou contend, that the disputed right is de rived directly from the Constitution, and that the Vice President's authority is wholly inde pendent of the will of the 8enate, which can jieither give, nor take it away. it hi not my wish to misstate vour arguments in the slight' est degree, and, to avoid the possibility of misrepresentation, you shall speak for your self. Spurning the authority of the Senate, you scornfully observe: ".un mt easy urance of a man stating a conceded postu la'e, he lOhslowl says After all. the power of the Vice President must depend upoT. the rules and man-pa of the Senate' a postulate not onlv false in its principle, but which, if true, would not sustain the cause to whose aid it is invoiced. Unless the Constitution of the United Slates was subjected to some military construction, '.he power of the Vice President, in presiding over the Senate, rests on derir. holier foundations, than any rules or usages which that body may adopt. What savs tl, r.nrmtltut'inn? The'Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no voice unless thev he eouallv divided. 'The Senate shall choose their own bfficers. and also President nrn (pmTinrp. in the absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the ffice of President of the United States.' (Const. U. S. Art. 1. Sec. 3.) It is here made the iltitv of the Vice President to preside over the Senate, under the sole restriction of having no vote, except in a given case me rifiit of the Senate to choose their President ii confined to two contingencies: his powers, after being so chosen, are identical with those of the President set over them by the Con- stitutinn, and anv abridgment of those powers by the Senate would be a palpable infraction if thst rnnsiinitinn. Now Sir. what is the Import of the term Mo preside,' in relation to deliberative assembly? Cn any sophistry tWne a plausible definition of it, which would exclude the power of preserving order? In snnoinfinp an officer to preside oVer the Senate, the People surclv intended, not to erect an emn'v nairennt. but to accomplish tome useful object: and when, in another part of the Constitution, they authorize each House to determine the rules of its pro vedinga,' they do not authorize St to adopt rules deriving anv office created by the Con stitution of powers belonging, er vi termini. that office. If the plainest, or most pro found man in the community were asked what powers he supposed to be inherent in the presiding officer of either House of Con gress, he would instantly enumerate, first, the n wer of nVeaervW Order in its deliberations; next, that of collecting the sense of its mem bers on any question submitted to their deci sion: and thirdly, that of authenticating, by bis sifmature- their legislative sets ' ; t hsve before said, ami 1 mt that I am obliged to repeat a trui am. that the rieht to call to order ; is a necessary consequence of the power of preserving orderj and that unless a fielibe. ratine body, acting within the sphere of its competence, expressly Testnct wis power aim thii right, no restriction on them ean then be .uijnosed' An divestinar the President set bicfc W had received, ieitWer titwlr or ! implied! v, from tko People, the Reaata, in stead o acting trhiuatl tpbereof their competence,' would act UMrpinrry, ad na- conatitutionanya-tbey would nullify th eoa Atiiod vb'ick the fconW kad ewablUhed he wer teecMelves and their Prcsidentr thev would reduce ibesDeetvee to the saonetrous spectacle of a body without ahead, and their President to t&e rquany SMeetrouS spectacle of s head sritbotrt a body, aad their vioKot act, white it would he disobeyed as illegal, would h contemned as ridiculous. Bat, in truth, the Senate have never thua forgotten There can be no asistake as to the eource, or the nature of the power, accordinr to vour conception. Too teU ua plainly, that it rests " c l deeper, holier foundation" than the rules of the Senate that it is "inherent in tht Tree Presideot. and that, as presiding officer, he possesses ,i ex vi termini.- that an attempt to divest, and, of course to modify tbe power, ' by the Senate, would be to act' usurpingly, and unconstitutionally," and hat " such violent act would be unobeyed as il era!, and contemned aa ridiculous." These are, at least, lofty ground, and. if they can be maintained, there is an end of the controversy. It would be absurd to go further. An inquiry into the rules'and uaares of the Senate, after such grounds are occu pied, becomes ridiculous, and much more so. an inquiry into those of the IIousm of Par liament: for surely if it is beyond the power of the Senate to give or withhold the right, it must st ana on an elevation tar above par liamentary rules or usages; and I was there- fore not a little surprised to find, that after so bold an assertion, more than four fifths of your long and elaborate essay was devoted to a learned and critical inquiry into these verv rules and usaees. There csn be but one explanation of so strange an inconsistencv: but lhat a very satisfactory one. You lack confidence in your own position; and well might you: for, surelv, power so despotic and dangerous, so inconsistent with the first prin cinles 01 liberty, and every sound view sistible (farce with which yer ewas tsode of reosotdftr appose the eubt aerial eoswuV utionel powets of tbe Settle, end Vow partial and aboard your arrwsnestt ka Savor of the inferred cosMitutiooa pewe of presiding Officer must appear ia contra wuh A) As absurd aa it now appeals, k shaB be, if poaaible. infinitely saot so, befcre I have closed tb part of the ksveasicauosk. J : V) ua tM same predilection, yow esswwp- bons are all OA the d of ubcoetroUed and aniisMted power, Without pvoaC oe eree so attempt at it, yu asMSe,tha( tbe power ia contTwversy ia aJUrel ia the Vice Presi dent, and that he possesses it, tsraooi, as preaidinf officer of the Senate. . Now I, ho have certaiaJv as wmch nrnt to assume as yourself, deny that he p met aw s any Bch power, and, what may perhap startle a same organised like yours, I affirm that, as a pre- sidi ng officer, he has an inherent power what. ever, unless that of doing wbat toe senaie smv Dreacribe bv iti rule, be such a power. There are, indeed, inherent powers, hut they are in the tody, and not in the sjtor. He is a mere agent to execute the wdl of the for mer. He can exercise no sower wnicu ae does not bold by delegantiion, either express or implied. He standi in the same relation to tb hndv. or assembly over which he pre sides, that a magistrate n a Republic does to the State, and k ouI4 be as aosura to ai rr'.Kut,. n the Utter inherent DOwers M to ! frpmr Tl,'i in fact. WM Once S fash' ionable doctrine. There waa a time oen tn.nna nr thought it monstrous, mat all of the powers of rulers should be derived fmm ao low and fihhv a source a the People whom thev sovern. " A deeper and holier foundation" of power wss aouglit, aiw tnat ... .vl.imnl tn h in the " inherent di vine " right of rulers; and, as their powers were thus shown to be maepenucm mc will of the People, it followed, that any at temnt on their Dart to divest rulers of power, would be an act of M such violence as would be disobeved as illegal, and contemned as ndi trace the analogy between euloim." I m'urht nf your language and principles and those of the Constitution, was never attempted to be the advocate ot despotic power in au ,rr. . ....ki:.t..j !L -i I rniintrin much farther, but I deem it not rniHiniiNicu uii i u " i ur n 1 3 mi imnrrnc a'i(i i - .v:.i. :.-m-. i u. ji.. nrcpsiarv either to weaken or retute your ar "'uwt ' winvii mu iuiciir;i, ,i,jwrrr namv i J . , i i nrpanized.cniild vKldsupnt.iinUunitil Iguments. a more oiretiMuui.u... "-vj uv. i..-.nn a. .i : j r manv De riven, " "r ": " m.c-uo ... I - . " . ... Ki- Thai siK-h .F. vn... f..l In. n n I AO lnilCrCIU TOWCr " "H" rele,) by aa erorcas rOe of the nooso. std that the Lord Chsaot Hos, se preatdaf oaRoer Hottae of Lards, SMSsaraaos K not estkee cs-oAcaoorhy drkrrt. a shall We bows hereafter, your osrosn aad slavish doc trine that st ia aa iaharsist power, will hw completely overthrew, and you are left with out the ooaaibility of escape. fsheuld rosi attesnpt to eatricot ovrseBr, by endceveriof to shew, that, undrr our Coav atiteXiosw the relative powers ot Use t ICS rre- sidral sod the Senate are differeot froea those of tho Speaker and tbe Haute of Coatnaone: and that, thoegh the latter assy Void the now. or by delegation from the body, that the Vice Preaideat mav possess it by a different and . . . i . . . . . bigner tetiuret it wouML at least, prove taai you cede the point that it is Mi inherent. and also that it cannot be aeaucea irons an alogy between the fewer of rhr two preaiding officers, which tew have, so much relied on ia aa-ther part of your eeaay. Buttbwebali not avail vou,- Tho door is already closed m that direction. ' It has been. I trust, coo- eluisvely proved, that the Constitution, so far from countenancing the idea- of the power being inherent ra the v tee rreowens. grrea it to the Senate, bv the strongest Implication, ia conferring the express ngni estaeusning its own rules, ana punuoing iur vuwurwcnj conduct. If you are not yet convinced, addi tional arcruments are Dot wanting.-wnich, 9 . though they may not extort aa acknowledg ment of your error, will inorougnry ooavince vou of it. 51 Tou have overlooked the most obvious and beat established rules of construction. What are the facts' Tho Constitution has desig- nated the Vice President as President of tbe Senate, and h.is also clothed that body with tbe right of determining the rules of its pro. Cceuings. It is obvious toai me aunpic inicuii on of tbe framers of that instrument wss to annex to the office of Vice President that of President of the Senate, without intending n ,rf,nr tha extent or tbe limit of his Dower in that character, and in like manner it was the intention to confer oa the Senate simply the power of enacting its own rules of pro ceeding, without reference to the powers, anch as thev mav be. that had been conferred on their presiding officer. The extent of po w. or. as between tbe two, becomes a question of construction. ; Now, tha first rule of eon. or In oereouerry hare tbe'ooor e4lrdig hi these new and danr erows .Htacka eo tho frstosss of debate. home men of honest intrwtino nave faTWn inte the error aho the nrtit of tixe Yloe Prs- sidentto pre serve order, independeoth of Utt awaote, heewuse the Judges, or, at they erpeew K, the presiding efficer us the eourts e justice, poaneea the right A moment's ro iectioa will shew the falUrr. There ia not tha iraot analogy between the riglitt ar4 dw ties of S Judge and those of a Breaidiar officer in a deliberative asaemblr. The analog ia altogether the other way. It is bet were tha Court and tha House. Ia fact, the latter is fteo eaUed a cotirt, arl ther ia a very etiiet reeemoiaoea ia lite point under oonstderaUoa, between hat anay be called a perliameetary court and a court of juatioe. They both hasw the right of causing their decision to he rev pected, and order and decorum to be obacN red In tVr presence, er by punishing those who8od.' Bwt who ever heard ofv the I peak er or Vico Preaideat punishing tsrdaav orderly conduct? Tho utmost power they ean exercise over disorderly conduct, or ra in the lobby or rterr, ta ttf C3vM " 10 op pressed, tor tne- tunc, y tne oergeam st '. Enourh has been sakL though the subject ' far from being exhausted, to dcasonetrate, that vour vie ws nf the relative powers and du ties of the Vice President and the Senate, in relation to the point in question, srr Wholly erroneoiie." It remains to be shown that your opinions (for arguments they cannot ba rais ed) are dangerous to our liberty, and that they are In connici who tne urm. nnnvi" vir Government, I do not attribute to you, or those with whom you sre associated, sny deep laid design sgsinst public liberty,- Such ail attempt, as flagitious as It may he, requires A sagacity and boldness quite neyomt wnat wo have now to apprehend from those In py wef. But that there exists, at tne present smv-, a ae'fish and greedy spnetite t get snd td hold office, snd that, to erten tnex groTeiimg od. jects. doctrines Slavish and dangerous are dai lv propagated, eon not be. doubted by even careless observers. The freedom of debate is instinctively dreaded by the whole eprps, high snd hw, of those who make a specula tins of nolitics. and well they mavs. for It Is who reads Tour essy can doubt. None of essentially to tne otne e, ano is in usnu vour sympathies are on the democratic side inseparable from it. 1 o divest the office of of our institutions. If a question can be wn1 be to enango s nature made a, to where power is lodged. It requires o "O longer the sume office. Wn' but little sagacity to perceive, that voii will P" wholly independent of the cnxm. he fonnrtnn th. id wh rlu;illr.lr !t in th "w "l"v fewest and least responsible hands. You perceive perfection only in the political ar rangement, which, with simplicity and enerpy, gives power to a single will. It i not, then, at all surprizing, that you should seize on that "ortion of the Constitution wh'ch anpm the Vice President to be President of the Senate; and that vou should quote it at large. sn! dwell on it at length, as the source of high and uncontrolab'e power in that officer; while vou have but slightly and casually adverted to another section in the same article, which clothes the Senate with the power "of determining the rules of their proceedings, punishing its mrmbera for dis orderly, con' uct, and with the coneurrenre of two thirds, of expelling a member (See Art. 1. Sec. 5.) Had vour predilections for the unity and irresponsibility of power been less strong, you could not have failed to see,4ht the point of view in which you hive thought proper to place the question made it one nf relative power between the Senate and its presiding oficer. Vou place the Vice President on one side, and the Senate on the other; and the more you augment the constitutional power of the former, as the presiding officer, just in the same proportion, vou diminish the power of the la'ter. What is gained to the one, is lost to the other: and the ereat and onlv effectual means of detect. . I n- - . . struction, in suca cases, is tne anown usage i tnfl holding up to public sooro every ma and practice of Parliamentary bodies; and, as Unination against the liberty of .the country, those of the British Parliament were the best U nnka first, even before the liberty of the know to, tne iramers wi inn vuiwiiuiuuii, n press, the trial oy J"T mc-ngnis-or cnnsci- cannot be doubted mat, in determining wnaw(nee. ma (nr writ oT naoeaa corpus, in jno sre the relative powers oi me v ice rresioenx estimation of those who are cspsnie ot iorm- and the Senate, they ougnt to prevail. unaer ungBCMTeet estimate of the value of rree this view, as between tbe Vice Presi 'ent and). iomni the best means of preserving it. Senate, the latter possesses tne same power Against this palladium of liberty your blows in determining its rules that is possessed by vt ;medi and, to do you justice, it must be the House of Psrlisment, without being res. acknowledged. If the energy be not great, tricted ia the slightest degree by the met, that tne direction Is not destitute of skill." If you the Vice President, under the Constitution, could succeed in establishing fhe points which is President of tha body, saving only the right yon labor, that the Vlea President holds a of adopting such rules as apply to the sp- power over the freedom of debate, under tha ' potntment or election of a presiding officer, rjght of preserving order, beyond the .will or urMh the Ranate would have possessod, If mntmlof the Senatei and that conseqsmntly. the Constitution had not provided, a Pre- he alone is responsible for what m'ght be sident of tho bodyi and, aa I have proved I considered an undue exercise of the freedom of speech in debate, a solid, lotmdsnon wouia be laid, from which, in time, this great bar rier aninst despotic power would be bsttetv to established rales of construction, thst the I ed down. It is easy to see that the scheme jik l . - . as. nB.avaiWna Mg tiSMasnnis mis riias nrsr cellor. a. presiding officer of the Hotiseo, "en.xea.su P. .nd. ofthc Lords to XJoXttuX by affixing too bigb an Idea tc the power, of uA places it. custodv in the hands of MVwSivX the pressing officer in preserving urder. fc iingie individusl, snd he in no degree r. XZdJ&to Acrdingto yourconceptron,the House is .ponSble to the body over which this high boSi0over wfi rte?whlchc.B nothing, nd the officer evety thing, on poinU JUer is to he exerciwd. thus effectually de. bodies 0Ter""Y"v nor modify the of order. Nothing can bo more erroneous, stroying the key ,stone of freedom, responsl neither give no tak f l Lra. TheTowervou attribute to him ha. never bility. and Introducing intos vital part of These cuerabsmd a. the, been pooseoiedhy the Prerident, or Speaker, 0.r syrtem. uncontrolled, or. What is the ssmo tion These consequejices, no. ru J ' ,i-r.heaiivo assembly- no, not even thinsvdestotie powen whichk being derived. . , Ktt DW. .-"lU 1 I CI V UllHU IlWllll". "J " . . - . . - 1 ' .. . . .. .. . be created or filled, or in what particular manner its func tions mav be exercised. If, then, the power belongs to the Vice President inherently, at presiding officer ot the senate, w is uecauac , u awnt'ailv attsched to the mere function int, of presiding in s deliberative assembly, snd consequent!' oeiongaio au jnrmi..B over such assemblies: for it would be absurd to assert that it is inherent in him ss President of the Senate, and then make it depend on th. circumstance, that he holds his appoint ment to preside in the Senate by the Cont'iiu- tion. The high power, then tribute to the Vice President, ;f vour aroiiment be correct, of the House of Commons, to the Lord Chan by the Cont'iiu- sident of the bodyi ft " I nave proved w n which you at- from your own cases, that the Bartleuhu- pow nt. must belong, er in question, IncoutroverUbly belongs to be , to the Spesker the House, it follows, necessarily, according hv onr theory, from the Constitution, and your premises. . J;i,t of preserving order must depend being applicable to all points of order, neees- Kow, " out m mine own '"";'"" v " - r; " ' enrorci,Tg it, or of punishing Mrily would vestin the Vice President alone, dentn thee;by your own am n 'ndependent and absolute Power, that shall, be refuted To prove that the Vice forw oreac f in this competition of power, vou were hound rreswem "rXlttl ted to the Chair. Our Constitution con. an unlimited control over the freedom of dc to present fully and fairely. both sinVs This ' hu. .nd .xercises fines this right to each House of Congress, by bste vou have pot done, and consequently, vou have fallen, not only into gross but dangerous errors. You set out by asserting that the very object of the appointment of the Vice President as president ot tne senate was, to Mark the consequences! If the Vice Presi- 9 tne same party or in. the President into how. dependent on him for his poll UlllkCI.-. " I 7. . . , I J L.4 ..... .'FI .... - , k.W'nmr tn v ico rresiaent. i tirai atanainar or anccin:i, r w r-.- . . ... - . . . .mm nr in.w in I in w in-npr. hmvi.,... - m j i .i.-.i.- v. j .ii .1 . tne important luiiuu-y y i"--: . " - i ...nmu. 1 -n.. 1 .1. .r wM tk ftmilam ar Ombnla , - - , wiich we are now consmenng mo 4ucun. ex lnnm. necessary to the attainment of cl dele!rilted? K the former, the end lor vvli.cn ne was appointen. 1 laving V""-. . ' ., .,.,im- fmm 1 1 acKnowiciigc --- : r.vni. nf th inherent power b "kj, . , . 1.. . Vice Presdent, would have mucn toree, out, ni8 coumryr . n dSicUM,0N if the latter, it must utterly fail: for, f de e- It is simply the r, t w hi 'conduct from investigation. gated, it clearly establishes the power is m u. ,o. u T-nS hslhe 32, vou absurdly suppose, it is not even Chief appointed. Having gained this point, you make your next step, that the right ot enlorcing order involves that or calling to order, and mat again in volves the very power in question, which the Vice President declined to exercise, lou then draw two corrollaries: that the power held by the. Vice President being derived direct from the Constitution, is hcldindepen dently of the Senate, and is, consequently, be.vond their control or participation; and that, as the Vice President alone possesses it, 1 .i.;Ai. mmi iinv.. ao nuiiujuuDiv ....... i,vt. 1 ut.i 11,0 r.v v ' and for not enforcing which, according to kttht hand tosnrtjos- ,, ina. your conception, you ana your assoviaicauaic sou-tiiu- i'n-i A . i . : : "i f the denounced Mr. Calhoun almost as a traitor to were, into the Chamber 01 toe oenate, ana nisee 111m virtually iwrt" uiurnuiUnvi " . r . . I . . . . .v.lln ..,nnn it la not vn Ch ef Magistrate snoum oe re-eiectea, ana. affirm and. consequently, not innerem in tne oer, as jm """ -v Z2 - Y . " ; .,., ,K. avhtrh mnnnrti him should sue. i'-V:: ... affirm. The instances connected witn re. 1 no riRnv i; i -- -v - - , . - v, . . r. . . r- ....,:. I- cited shall decide the point, k' What y the case? - On the 14th of April, the VFT bdoubted that the rule, for the re- 1604, .rule conceived, .W if .n h,. .,! 1,P a W is responsible for order and speak impertinently, 7. "'...a that the Chair cannot enforce which have been insisted on open.y oy uio 1 :n i.nnri ; Bi.nrti v m mc fmcry w mww hv..... . - ... . 1 ... a. .1-4 i... uinff auniiiii nil rnn. - ,i-. 11. rt.r. ineDoav aione can. out ip", uuni , . . . . -I . ' .1 k..w,.n. 1 . decorum. Such is vour summarvtogic, wtncli von nr.comnanv with so much abuse of Mr. Calhoun, for not calling the power, which you have, as you suppose, clearly proven that he possesses by the Constitution, into active .. . . 1 cnetgy, by correcting ana romroinnp, m n sole will and pleasure, the licentious and inv nertinent debates of the Senators. Let US now turn tne same niouc m rea- and to I its calls to order. Iana oraereu ut . : I . .v. ::A.nt tnual follow the riirht I iesST,S0 iars urci: wuupmui... voh. ,c,hofMay,l6C4ramP 1 intA o inner ntwTfciia, a luc s ,r i v " .j .1-- . 1 nnnri m mi arrchULiCMi hi miui WMcao sj iva son ng on the side of the benate. ana you .nalc not to ihe matter in question, the s Senator to csil tw oruerj r -y will perceive that it applies, with infinite man spras. Ro it is said on the duct- So clear . a . . 1 I. A . 1 sinpaKir in au II v-a , m . aa more force, tnougn you nve not mougui " "t"V". .sin !. a member made what member cauea u .nJei,.Ma... AnriH iw-, r. 0 . -a ... n;in a tonious sneecn J . . :. , k Hirrt(l I hplnnrrs a-1 n .1,.. HAiiw. .lie ijaii. w 1 n t "' . ' . m .v-l.l.r:.. -j t.,l hv Mr. K neuter. -un toe iustim iytn oi way, i wm,a --- - into a long speech, a rule agreed, that it any ced to practice,' through a subservient Vice are tnosc ruicar wis advert to no other, is, Executive, as a co-or- to disbranch of that Government, cannot b. Te President, and,if vour argument be called in question, by a Senator in debate, at ntffiSSdert must follow the right, "esofarasitretates toimpea deserving of notice. The Constitution has vested tne senate with the riel its proceedi for disorderly conduct, which may even to expulsion tutu, . - - 1 1 - nMPh. and tnere was i oraeriv cunuuv., seemea an iTnpcr..t..v-K"---. ---- --- I t... conduct of the President m such esses, would iiaoia What Senata register the decrees of the President, snd sing Hasan. . be disorderly, and render the Senator jilt-1-.!.-eu. .1.. to be niinishcd. even to expulsion. .l.uiiniwH .i ih nfw.l wouia un uia v"",c'"v'," - " , t.uw.. .w r-T"-? I 1 , . .... v . UnAm' tn . .1 .1 . . ..... .a 1 wiviin inrriuiv mi. .,. ., w no oiner rcnieuv. iwi -m ra-1 natiiiitinn has vested tlie senate """"l" " ' . - .1... .I.M'.nB-nfKrrr .... .; . ., .r n,,whliiaainir ana SPUIIUIT. -mi I - e- :. - - .. ... if r .1 - r . -.--,-.-- -- ,...---- , ;,;,. imeecnes. - 1 -j . ' . tared, that when the Chair, in sbate, if any man I there has slv ' ...... Mnonkav I m rrA9. aaLSL mil V II III WS I t-nlll SJLT V vaw s w Ia.. .- a.atan A UrillBK I IS S HEW lU"' ww J I . e (I . sr nAa.nA.AH(a I in T mg oracr w "i , ?r ' "" Z 1 m Sce Hutsell's lTeceaenis, yos.u, -u ,r.c, -inht v. tt ... dsn be a violation 01 oraer, sna to rmore 1 ..i'.-t - f m e. 4Uam- If Ht M I awiavsif nf If. flft inr onwui "'W . 1 s extend impertinent sees. T Y" .u:riK. t .1" :r;rrr.,e7iV;nv man Uhre ha. always been such indiosition to I ,u "WrpS ZZJZ . . la SAaSaiS-lnSOBSl 1B npiril IS SXIIVa ISB J 1 1 -A I .1 Ik. I I Ilimrw,. ill w IllS-ia VII U V .at w-wa- vnsw the pPwerto ebl,Shm,es, ..to pre r 1 1. -. testatHtrt I Htilw HV Tllll?. v L . 1 ! -,J a a Ta WaiAIMMfi inil WIICII I II S3 allaVIl 1 III m""" ' ' I . - .. a Ofr.aa saVa r OS aa aVOaW A ti.-.t ohteet ofgMnr November, loau, w- ri" " - ZLZ i... .twa'vs been, each ndispositiott to ;,ww .UPPI-E1 JVn tT-Y! e," .1 - -" " 1 express I omA In? ndcauate punishment. The Senate alone lias these powers by th Constitution; consequently, the senate alone has tne rignt of enlorcing oraer; ana, cunscnuciinj, ever right the Vice President possesses over 0 .... . . r . .1. o ... ..-! order, must oe aenvea lrom mc ocii therefore, he can exercise no power in adopt. ing rules or enforcing them, dui wnaiiiss been delegated to him by the Senate, snd - .... . J ..ttaa only to tue extent, ooin in manner uii to which the power has been delegated. Tbe particular power in question not hsvmg heeo-delegated, cannot: be exercised by the v. PaMnt. and. consequently, he Ss not responsible, D you not perceive the in. edition. 1 ,Wes, !;l: dsSSaan exerci of power, he .htmldln- . Thotisanas o. Kh w dul (for, indulgence it must be alled, if spo you notnoe thsever that i ' - a a . . w... aix i r,nia wiiirii' fiibii i is uuki uciiubiouiv ontn vb i --r . ' t. l,!.i;rtM f ta M recent: oceurrencfe W the l!ou Pf 1 When Sir. Hume mnoe n ' " W ".m1i?. t.t-. .!M ,Mh of Iondon and the Lord Clisn- inaio,, r m -7.7:" - . m. . s x . a a pewer was tleiegaiea oy .l,'c "l".,, is, "rule concei ven, ice. been said and uttereo r. -r? . r. ... ., fo1iowi Pr-cJ,.!- . . 1 .. . . t... ih Knv waned inr 1 k.hw.ivw .. ..... -... .- -- . c. tmng.Duiin -...v... " ,Krr----. i.i,.,- ,t,:-fc 1,.. oeenrred the . last v wir.ter, 10 . .Jv'T mth, re t,ncer in the interference ot some 01 tne memoc, ,u ------- - - . tfun wou1( . 1 ..Kl..hrt. r)PVOHQCOHl..c..j, ... II U rvvm ...--- -i- . ;. to as general rule," " rule agreed,' . . t a . iLa asaS wbicbvtf tnember. of thejed a .uppou -V.K "S :Ci .-d not in the presiding officer. Ion the Bishop c decided proof that the horn delegated to tbe Bpeaaeroi mo n ow.. T . M ..n there had I gainst the Vice President, w oraer to pros, of&fcmo IJtlSSP JSC V? oTpowithotpatro or po.wcr.or . tt. HgKt v them by tfc People, of sny, power 1 V- '-. . " WC3- '
The North-Carolina Star (Raleigh, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
July 28, 1826, edition 1
1
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75