Newspapers / The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, … / Nov. 15, 1811, edition 1 / Page 4
Part of The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
E 1. r .1? I Accirapanyine "tntf mei'tie ol" tie IPreiklent of the ' Uaited - - ;"t -k SUftl, Ciy&.,3UftA2S !:!, 1803, -. . i C P'. The 3d prder gf- ,th 25 January i 1 798,' di rected ; the , cruisers ta, brink itf all vessels laden ;:r wnl cartroes, the ipMuce Mw)Prance Spain or V: '. , HgUan and cpraifedrectl; from any part "of ;' . , v'tho, said. islaiUls or settlements to any port lri Eu flSiper nor iting a port; of (.Crest Britain, nor of . '.-f ,,-r;ine country to. vynicivjuen, amps rjeingjieuii;ai oe I" , .longed.' The &k effect of this order was 'to eati f 1 to the neutral powers of Europe, the accom. Jv:'"'i:ihodaiioo which had been yielded, to ' the'; United ' .' .States Ivw that nf Sth Janiiarv. 1794.1 The next present to have settled the doctrine But he makes that reservation, if indeed It was intended a one, in such terms as to preclude the idea, that it would ever be taken advantage of esprciallf when it rs considered, that the report: was accepted by the government and, communicated : Officially by the secretary of state, tt a foreign minister. It iacer tain, however, that through the court of apne.I, the new encroachment on the rights of the U- Mates was made, which produced the controversy which ensued immediately afterwards ""'' v The discussion which Kx,k place between lord Mulgrave and myself in 1305. on the subject of the seizure, then made treated the encroachment in that line as the special cuse of comprint on the part of the Untied States. Alvh h th Briish pretension to inhrutteven the diiectt a ehanot been countenanced by the government; vet the commerce of the U. Spates had eh made in a! certain degree to accommodate with it by the . State of North Carblka. Jjtmes Irwin."' V. f Original .fftwflrf. - Kan t Uryson y.y,;,..,,. Mv.- . J TV . , U4 tiiiw,ii i, , ,' 1 1 ppnti nm lie re'tnaaw in tr rMt 4w not within ihi liui. 4 Ui au, U lc , that mbliCAtn fe n.ae IhtVr nrrtha . trtt. . urn t hit in :uc!nni-t b. wl p.m i w - IV? S f! 1! and that titles bx ti p-- .t t u-rt, f j 1 J,KT ah , or replevy, Mtdnttnt iU b. Ui-ms '- 4 t-rt ? 4 , a-. ute df North Cat uli no. merchanis. Thry vere content to decline he di ' Ko ,monto:, mi ' j ..... . ... V Rubcrt Dry son. .order. bears date on Uje, 24th" June, '1803.vlf di ? rects the cruisers not to seize ari'yvessel( which colonies of enemies and tjhe' neutral country (.toJ wnicn ine vessel aewngs, ana laaen wun in pu pvi iy of inhabitants of such neutral country pro vided trfat such, vessel shall not be supply injr nor I I vllxa vt supplied the enemy on the outwardoyage i reOt , trade, and to 'pnrcue their iMe-puae-js i f vwitn any articles oi cwtraoana oi,war,c ine utju w wimci. n vm"7 sne mo t .. , . V' I f u k;Lt t4.S. o-;ll. k.-;a ther tountrv .nri it, colonic, ft w nalur.l b. W4. 3M?V couta. of a eontroversv wh eh .cTf d h th. li,Uof thcitit Hrf tfcat , iutiSgee h,rtbe n.hti of the pa ts ...P'W lTC ine irrca'.eM extent. o 'lie Jiirnt lt:roii. on ttvt , 7 , rr .. . ; r subject by a very able ev. wheh I rrctivrd "Hcy, jtTe will be f from you, I was much -ndeUtcl. fcnt-l c;kiw. 4' " J IN !ldS l'l tm:":Lr?,:Hr ald. wn!CU u i Sutc of North Carolina. vttu iui Him vi uuai Mi aiai il'l li.lK4- 1 1. , ' Lit ml fce place of destinatkn-: It prohibits ihe seizure of heUUral yissels, 1Cropean as jrell as American, engaged in a trade between enemy cbl mies and the., neutral cou'niriesJ bv' rxnitive inhibition. The rifcht to carry on the tirade fi4mthe neural coun- try WOiBer countries, was ieit on iac grouna ou - which it stood be lore, That this order was not in . teVnled to, affect that' irade,' and did not affect it. - i$ made; sufficiently' evideht ty :roay decisions of thjcb'u'rts; been s?ven since the order as issued. ' In pi bbf of this I re i tch tQall the cases that were decided by1 the Bri- ti?h toujptsf Wmiralt;touching he Jrade of neutrals with enemy colonies in the years 1804 and 5v anyd more "fespeclally 16 that bt the William t li'-jfijKZ'' la one and containing; a :tiAtf.:J&i yhole'doctrine. v . , hJttf cju'b;tne' deciions of the courts them. t1telvesiihal: find a' full' confirmation of what Y.$j5' b!jr5 advance4-:i;; We shall find that in confor :;: -rniaef thtir decisions to the spirit of the orders of tl goverbmenV they inhibit the direct trade only s b"fct ween . the colony and the parent country, or j,' j n ;some other country of Eurrope : they do not -csll I .. ... . . . . .... ' . ui qnesnon ui.iraae tieiween iteuirai powers in theV productions of enemy colonies,' a tier those pVodoctibns were allowed tpfcavebeen incorporate "ed into fie st,ock of the country t that theygave' recent and high offence only. by the new doctrines advanced, on this latter point, which, by assutn ingf to investigate the motive of the parties rn. gaged ,iit th trade, arid to reject acts which' were betore deemed sajtisfactqry by; decisions the most solemn, and to impose" pew conditions the most onerous'ahd yery completely at ihe mercy of Jtbe British tribunal . The most inaerml cases( are those of the Imtnarw uel, whicli involvld the question of aj - trade be. Jween Bourdeaox' and St. Dcmino,' thaV the direct 4rade between the parnt'countiy and its colenyin which the goods ? were condemned on that acGouht.Vlbini Rep; 2d vol. page. 186 And of the jPoily Lasky, jri which theVessel Was taken . on xr voyage fron Marblehead td iipai, charged wiOi the productions of the Havannah, brought to Marblehead by the same vessel. . ; In this case the question of continuity of Voy 8ge was imolvepV and the court decided .in fa vor of 'he American claim6b gt'ourtd7that gave no offence. It was admitted in txplicitf terms by the -TrtttdgtfHhai-an American had a right to import the is produce of the Spanish ;coloftieO'to, his ovn , country,, and to carry them on thence to the gen eral commerce of Europe, and that the landihe of the cargo a Ad payment of the duties worild be suf V ficK-jnt crr eha of a boha ude lmpoiiation 2d Hob 4 Rep' page 461. The next cases-were those of the Kssexl Orne, of the Rowhena. andome 0- ' therrtbe' same kind in 1805, which turned on , ! ; the oint of continuity of voyage in which he court, ; pushing' its doctrine" to the unjust and pernicious I', axteritomplaitied 'bfi prodooed. the controversy 1 which triok place between the the countriesV 4: TiiZLCLzcnzr.zi..i. , a'r mi tkt'i w L . I A trxpf tgsKt r iltsJs' . uIUf.t.fc as t&e i - t6 f 1 I mm . . J m-smm -'-iW.l(l i--4 , Mi 'A ; !ftt.rl-LLCOCIY, Ttwbcrt Simon .oOf'l 7" T,r r - 1 R. Srrl ItrvsAA. 1 It apMinnc tht the dekadbr4 t 11 eaa ; r- iAt wiit'n the iimits 4 the state, H ej&yU iwa"e?tTwM W , , pu' .licatitai be w4e thre mmttk m the M.rv -a 4 fcw st ,; 4 , that i" attachment hat iued 2aau twnv a.ri.,t, ' f t that tiulikt he ear at wt cwirt. and ftfcjut ,f v t1.' C rfc' .4' 1 -fculen, iudirtucr.t wu! be tAn 3rU.i m. j t v ' tiuii, howeeer, ot Hie ca je o i pnnci;c, h -w. ever extensive the rane inin U, , j t ef. feet the origin of C!ie omtr ctsy, n.:r tve.t.0 the article eiiicrul into tor j j innr h.i vru i'jn diffcrciiUium iha.s ' (!iui, by c e&:ll:slud rules, is fun ly apiihch'e to 1 . trom this view 01 turevtrulod-rs of ;ht Uri tish g(ve4 i)iueiu, ni.d ir -ui txpbiiioi--' r,i7nof . thtm by t!ie couris, ai.J by -.he Kovn .-. n. it self, it aicars tli.it llir s"l u-jerf '-.f Ui"i- 'Ki were issued" 4:u that of tht 6h Not cm IT93, Were to inhibit Die direct tror cf ihc 1 11. led butts octwLta utc enemy ci..ic a..i i.n pe ; that ihty did not t.-Uviu airj wre n it !&vu4ctto interfere wuli the tra e bliWrci. the' L: :ui States and Luropc, tvtu ttu: patent cou.-u. . c ! a lurti oi iueiM'c-vn the Li.i.tu oi.iiu ud Viij ai d Afn ca. li was. indict! tut bjv. t ut the tt.tr of Nov, l7s3, 10 &tics in, c m'l'f ic i-l nettral powers with enemy coiom s uUn;tiI.ti ; but thai heme rfba: tlciutt'. the l.irt it. .1 vi .1 h n-mil u. .a m:H!irat inn ttt- i.ud itirv tiutnlKkju 1m. t' k..t " 1 1 ---- - - . ttatst rf (u sif-cisrati, to embarraas that itadc by toning it thHwgh ntu that n attachment b issued rsjt I. ins. 4 j- if,- tftt tral countries Here, then, wios a new question, that units la aptxar at rest court and U.,4 c t, ..... ..-i -. . wiutn lurncu tinner iy 011 anvuncr piii'c.i!ic. 1 nat rennvy.- I'lorotm vi;j &e v. sen cttm rim State of North Carolina. JkUl it IMG tilt. MussenJine MalthewO KJjrt Urvsoo, ) ircrj. j law wesl t f5s&j?j a f m V V ff .b'i... kW... .i.. .4- f. I. a, - ... rut witl.in the limns el lb. aie, 11 1 r:d. td that -r iff 1 The' cbmmdnkatbri 'between Mr. King nd lord flawkesburyii advocate "genfet-al admits int his; reportvwbich was . byfhirntb' MrrKingi that by the relaxation of .the 7 gttverai principle respecting the trade-with enemy, colonies, it was distinctly understood, and had been repeatedly so decided by the court of appeal, thatTthe produce. of enemy colonies might be'.inv' ' port into the ytieittral country, and re exported thce Vpf7i 10 the motier coxwry Ixtf-such eoloBy, f and. iy. like manner'that tthe produce and'mantifac i tuureV of the mother country might be carried to lts bbloQies. He states that a direct trade between 'the; mother country and, its ajojonies nad not been recognised as legal that what amounted to an in 'termeiatet importation 'jnilght.8ometimes,..'be a question of difficulty ; that theirere tochiuift in the neutral country, to take ilrfrcsjfv waraViCes might perhaps be, deemed va. 9 1 b-j ' . " ' -'- . . 1 . i . . " . . 1. . f I hifh lh ar . iu tr.i uti.n 1 a m -a v. .ln .1.. m. xc (and ne saw no more reason tu expect tnat, tne- -'mv iwiwuuvu, paiutu,auj p . gourt of,?ppe?ar woild,Vary. the rules) that land plicable to the direct trade between the enemy ' ' ii.ihgprjdi'.and paying the- duties in the neu colonies and their-mother country, yet as the term VtridcbjuVtfyiWoi4 brqakuthe continoity: of th " Europe',' had. (bctn adopied,- and the modi Rca .vnvapel andCwas such an -imDortatlOrLas " 'would tlo,lS 'that" were,made in themv first ' at the in- 1 leg a lize the ad ' althou gh j. the goods were re ' uii aixuuiu (M tu jshipp.ed; in4the , same' vessels, on account of th -? same pt'oprietors, nd.were fprwatddjfor sale to Vihe Wther Country ;of the coltT v t ! V; vX'This'1mmuniCation:'cones'pds'in. very the. roinUtei circumstance with the spirit of the orders U-adolecmc i f It iiCtzl and in terms that ai e'farfmm bemir nosi f tiyei hat the direct trade, only bttweerij,hc$nothet 1 ' tnat tne iraue nrvugn vhc iicuudi wuuuy. in?; a neutral powtr haa anht'.o crry -n iridetrom it own inn'is, in uny ninths, though ot lortitfn produce, which haubttn-ii.coipora.cd into the! stock of the country not cuim aba 11.1 of war, and to aii couirtneq was not cdtrovctied Thai point, oihtrist clear and iiidisputttble iit itself, had been long settled in the highest tribunals, and by the1 most eminent jurists m Lnghmd. . The circpni ' sumstancts which constituted such an " i.ncerporav tioii of foreign ankles intohe stock gf tlte'coun- try, had also uttn settled by Uic same authori tiesV btiii the quetioti which now atoae n rued on' this latter point. In foiCeing this commerce through neuirai ports with a vuw to tmburrass it, it became necessary io give the greatest ef fecti to that expedient tt iuacasUhe iflku!iies in those ports, which was tionciuihc tuanaer al-1 ready stated. If Hie 'instructions of the British government did'not inhibii thu trade if que no. nc atija' meni coiilaiueu' in ihe article u.der cons.iUeruii u, could not uffcu it. . f hat titicle iupaiisns' a., thffti ence between the;" parties lelawvc to a trade' v-hlr enemy J- cototiies, anu tne i.istruc ions utcu ni'.encre wun it State of North Caroliita. ULUtU. Wfc "1 .. r 01 1 T. 4inu & , IS! ! Musseiidine Matthews Robert Dry son It appearing that the I'ekndant in this cast not within the limits of th stair it is i dr that publication be mauc three ir.oith in tb h nrrva. that an attachm-nt has iss':r: ajram.: uith. uud ibal unless he appear at leXt touti and -k4 or replevy, judgment wd! b. uktu iritnuwa. 5 .tin-- IO,. MMjhf.i.k , btatc of Nonh Carolina. James Fleming r' i't lli rcnn. 1 . . ' - It appearing that the tferendant in thitiaw r : ;. ' '' no' within tht limits i f the tau, it iain.r wl iUl V,-I te f.;KiM.f ---. taywte-ic.fc r ;Ut4';tJat .tw4Mi IW n&tf J- ...4 .4. tfcat ttkav. al t turn is i i , ttanac tiwir liN(if, 4 t j , J i ei l y lt t,p 4 !f -il hr raft Lr jpr ," . -in't i iy an trw.'..' tsr - ia ymtmmmt f t wi 4.'4M per kx r 4 rtr tU t Rin t . ' Thm 6r t.ttujwt tA th-i f J , t ! Cw4.C MM tlMjp lt V- rf ' j k uawauii jt t:.e c J.' jr i r a x j WKnvs avu . r ly tf iu- i . 1 ittcl-l l-rH4r- llt- . 1 1 tt Ct a4 k -4n4 f r W , TTp id 4 s TtI lwai m - t. iJtrm fj" 'rfrrfiat ft tl 1 ai 1 he article could not oiruu . .n any iradv to Puu,lcauun w ro mxc 4m. cr, TW. tnWftrf U(taf4iVf which the mknictions uid not extend, and' con 1 ut an' attactomeni has isst ea agairat. turn, awl jl Cliwt- wturt ccinmg which there was ho r,ntrc-vtr?j; Tn he ltrt -fl-. ... i-.-ik r jjrvw, 4.ttM preseni case the conc.usioi. is tht mctrWis-rble, judgment wul W- haW g tl. 4 ar. f- 4 poss i.'in. y r tr" :-rr'' '. - , vr;' btate oi INorth Carolina. because there tutf jiov exi.a cvei. 4 poss, otiny of cuuirorersy in rtgaid to tha tiadt llui-n is interred that -causc it "is-stipulated, thar the produce of entni culomt siy re car ried to Europe from. the Uiitu d .Siau .s, t. at the "portiof Asia and-.Aitica art shut n Uitm, and because it is stipula'ted that the 4'nanuiji'iurcs' of Eurcpe from the United States to the West In dies, that thoue of Asia and Africa,' ar; prohibited irom being carried there. This objection has been already '.obviated. Hd tlie instructions of the llmishi goveriir 1 -:nt inhibiied that - trade, jand, a controversy betwetn tie governments arisen from the inhibition, as the article does not extend to the case, the most that could have been interred would have neen that it was uiipruvidt.d for, anc that the rights of the parties wouia remain in the same state respecting it, as if the article had ' not been entered into.: Jt is easy tot xplain the cause why the term 44 Europe" was introduced into the ar- ' r " IREDLLL COL'N ; V, ''!".' . ''.-." iugut &mucnt till; WiUiam Watts,"! . ; vs. Original Juathmtnt. Robert Bryson, J 8 V tt appearing tnat me oeiencent in tnn case it . be baitrd frccry t asl ! ' TtltJM vs j II-Marmnty.Ottt. fit. - nnt within the limit nf ill vtat.. It S rvri?v.1 lit publication bt made three months in the Jliwr-, Hft that an attachment has issued atrainsr him nf ; ' that unless he appear at next court and nltad of )erl oa J State cf North C&i ws. latatii, ! v. w .... rs ' -M3rjr?M r' a plead j replevy, judgment will be taken against hitn. 5 3m JOHN NISBKT.clk. State of North Carolina. " 1' " IRkDELU COUKf l', , ', : - jiuguit Setiont 1811. Andrew Watts,"! ' -vs. yj .Orieinal Attachment' 1 . tide, in reference to the pons, to which colony Robert Bryson, j produce' might Lbe carried, and in Enropian'r rt-. It appearing that the defendant in this case is terenct4otheinanutaciuri wta state, it is ordried that ricd to enemy colonies, anct to shew, they were : publication be made three months in the Minerva. that an attachment has issued against him, and! 1 " It appealing ibat t IfiOt withia U tlmutt! tk w ' ' piblictH be id thrt iBsahs ? ''' that an attachnHM aaa 44 s. ihaisnkt he appear at rstt i riplciy. thnMttt .3 te t9 aTr18' V U: Sutcof North Cirol- adopted with a view t9;open on the widest scale the ports; whicfr had bee ; at any time shut on them by the Untisii orders. Although the1 poli cy of fhese orders, as Weil as of the principle on stance of the United States, arid afterwards aFthat -a kL '. L' : "1 ",t".w:,:,"i?r"vijjJi,. .3 i - yi 111c neuirai .-cunpean powers, as. tne. .widest scale Within, yvhich . the inhibition operated, it was tnougiH oesi 10 use .mat term to prevent tne possi lityAbf-misufkeasno.theW.e'nt adjust ment..' Had terms of mOre extensivc import been adopted, -hej!: -bould,: !hot have been more effectu al to the object, while they might have tended to enlarge the ? sphere dfBrilish pretension, Joy ex tending it. to casv t0w hich lit would e highly improper to give a sanction. ' -Silya L'.'v : WecaseIri Moiirrie's Let'erat this point as examining par 1 'Smother couhtfy Vf the Cplor.y was '..tawful, t?nd fix" fvVciose .MriJMpiiroVa Letter at; V ei, 'ith greii precision, tha acts to be' performed (the remainder of his occupied in exa ;-r v... ' ... v 1 r, . - .-. .-V.-.v-.,-"-. , -V. - , " . ; ' 1.,.-. ..... .v;;.'.,,....;! x '- 4. -.s.;. . - James Irwin. "1 that unless he appear at next court and plead, or jRobtnryv.J rejfevy, judgment; will be taken against him. 5 3m JOHN NIMlET, elk. - State of North Carolina. ; . ' v IREDELL C( X : : ' August Sesaiont 1811. John Stevenson, V - -v V ',' -4 ' - 7 . '',.'. ; 0rgiif tfttachmrntt, a :JiTX: Robert Bryson, J- ' v r V . '":--.! '" ' . It appekrihg that the 'defendant, int'thta' case" is not withiw'the UraitsCbfithis state, if is ordered that publication be made three, months in the flfi nerva that an attachment has issued atrainst him. 1 -. .. ", .:. .'I. ana tnar .unies ne appear at next court and plead I 4 ov replevy, judgment wTiri)eaketragaTtisf TiTnT; V . ,.' .. : ,..a,-ls. ' v. '''i''i!''f;S''' Executed at tlie AUntna)OjewU Hc)Mjis$aitd inot within the Lms's cf tf t '.,. -J" ' bubfkation be made three to'' tf " , -thianttchment la lmd a. -m S SOI j 9 1 . ',"' ;;'r'- IH T it Sf H'V.; . ILL sell ttia ttn v!4-Ja lowinf rrdjctd pfiCO I .- i - Bound in boards, ( ;( X Bound in ci!m ; ! - t t -.tf .!.v.!v rTTt. Which is 48 dollars ctr l" ' herttofore beca t',!4 at ' Oct i I- 4-
The Raleigh Minerva (Raleigh, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Nov. 15, 1811, edition 1
4
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75