North Carolina Newspapers

RALEIGH N. .-PUBLlSHSP (wKi.T) B: i AND A, I Liiflt) YL AN fox $3 :5Qf rwrr imDfJiNcg. 4 VjlT. 7 1- ,.4 : FRIDAY;-ULY,'24, 181 2. yV-1 V. fv I, - " ''if. V;X MIM1HIII...UIIIPMII. .in.,. J .1 .. .1,. 1 1,1 a ..tvr... POLITICAL. ffs to tKe People of the United States', '-.'BY-MEMBERS OF, C0.NCRE8S, " - WAR WITH Gtt fcAlBRITAlfr. V . (CiNTlNUFD.) , T cial 1 ber intercourse act ol March 1309, and the ect " concerning intercourse" of May 1810, vest the President of th witFfihe very same power, in. the very same terms. Both it if mm "in case either Lireal-untain or trance sn-auso revoke orfify her edicts, as that they shall cease tq violate tlie neutral cJbrce of the Ui States" to declare e i&tyt prodauiAliou. ths provisions, at one law m.sttcU,eeQAntre94rs..wjiK' s by those of the other it waS'ti Uefeviv'fcd; lt ora3tque,x( . 1 . . . f . . ....... - A --'-til?'... ' ' er vestad, 1V tne ursi act, me arrangement whm jcisume was am) the revocation of the orders in council of January and No; r 1807. was consideved as a full compliance with the law and emoving all the ami-neutral edicts.1 The blockade of May, '18(16, ,i not included in thr arranireracnt, ami u djes not appear, that a is deemed of sufficient importance Jo-engage even a thought. Yet, tier the act cf May, 1310, wHch vests the very same power, .a. re cation of this blockade of Ma,. 130$, is made.byjbur eraiinet. a ran : ah induDensible requisite ! And now, after the British mi-' strr lusdirecilv avowed that this order of blockade would not ton gue nfier a revocation of the orders- in council, without! due appH dibn of an adequate force, the existence of this blockade, ! insisted Don; as a Justifiable cause of war, notwithstanding,' that ourigovt'r'n- Tent admits a blockade is legal KTthe mainUnan.ee of which an ad- quale force is applied. !, ' L ' V'-i-v The undersigned are aware, that, in iustificutionof this new ground, t is now said that the extension on paper, for'whaiever.purpose in P.xArA. favnra ih nrinciolr ofoawr blockades. ' Thishowcvcf can Wdlv be urtred. since the Bri ish, formally, disavow the principle ; and since they acknowledge, the very doouine of the law of nations, for which the American administration contend, nenceiortn, me ex istence of a blockade be comes a question of fact : it must .depend up. on the evidence adduced, in suppoitof the adequacy of the blockad". iriQe of Fbnce'f byfa Tor mai iote, 'of the 2ili Dece'rr.be.rg':.for ibe'vvidehcie .thUvocaUotl. They wished' not 10 qcesii'jn, aveti Our minister Plenipotentiaf y, that the impeviat decree,, whain ryariints fortuSi'has; betii so ofteu asserted by the lmiiuV of the ?lst Noverober, 1806", '"-vta nh lo-jTrd tUr arnmrrct;, vhch tiuon andV. a'gent3,tytheir iirecu13n. Byt neither as -public men. . would 'iit it giv'irnejt bf'ke ruin tjttu-- freuitMifhtd iewfm.Btt'r-'.ias:: citiienS -can tbt-y consent thai iheXeace.aud prosperity of of the. Mfariije j 1806, assured f c viaa-, cmtnfnet. ii-.vnil3iuil(invic iiiia iissurancc, However, oil., ilie euuinrr soouj-j wc avitm.tu,u (iiiii.icuuulc a dosjiuci, wiiicu the .9-Sepiem'ber tullwin(ifV;I&gnie.r;irand Ividslejr bf"jus(ic,u ,w pinciplfc of evidence Uitfy .m tenii)f ' T bV canriorfaif. U -declared.; ui$at the . inuhh'tmf'ihJ'fieror wire ttidty fiy "virtue f- fy, or tonceal thcircoiivkitiolihutthe Frenchde'erets neither have ' 'that 'dt cfti-Ffeih:iurmc& vesek in nt u'f atitembv tiifieri bet 'tor ' . wviied.. ivvi . w , Jiatrorks end that he had rewrvfit'r fti im 'decision t&'.$utilifii) vf ?ych the. question of cfha ojwud, a concise statement k whether then iff'gAttyfa feW 'tAemnHwi' oj, ncW-rpt vibiefagritfg'tsrt Insepar!aWfrjfr6,lb.;5it V ; " ;' lor ,rom iirland. 'MthZughth'eytiadrA Jinglitk wnufj&fye Art, "Thc cocjditiop, vp ,bWtJ$&vftrffi to the ' Jocrrf. rntasyrc of Brirain, was, taliatiohr lltttt, if the precedent acts of tUV ttvvih VtiftttA m 'dfrreftWtut inusdt 'titdnouWc of jl?pn;fthrs 'point bo)h thi,tij;l. of Oie tte'ij.ejl "Stari3. ' ani the drty T -tbe'0'cnin decftts succeeded the Bri tl of Novhber foikiwiiitr.'- Tn.cse.dtclared u all ports, and ila ce" Dt iqiigug io. i'incc, ihi is iruui which iu? uiiusii nag ' wfcsfxcluded,1 and in the colonies of.h'is Britanic majesty's tne ' lilies,) a stac of blockade. prohibiting ail trade, !n ' (be pro 'ducc and m.3;uatur(ts,2pf. the 'said countries or colonies ; and '' Vitiaktng bll W sstls, uading to or from theinr atdVaU -merchandize ..oh board, subject-to capture and condenknation, with an exception '.only in fUtourot thp direct .trjue, ottvyecn neutral-countnes anu 44 the coloriies of his majt&ties enemies." ; ' ' ' - ,'fhese 4xtr4va'gaii pretensions, on the - part ci Cjriiat-Bfttain, were immediately &Ucce' ded by ot lie is, t!rmovee!ftravapat, on .v. "' ' i' n T ' ' ."' r . it- r . i. niahle ppnciplts. ""The ojbjecv to b; obtu'inf, foj- the 'United States irdmYvnnie: iva eneshualireiroeaonidb decrees. A re.wji.. ' wo to be erTcctual,! mus'i include, iiuhe hatyre of things this is. senti3l requisite i-the wrongs .dona lo the. neutral commerce el the , United States, by the' operation of the decrees, wutt be stepped Nothing short of this could be au. tlfwCtual jevocaiion. . VVithbtit refei er.ce tb.the otiitr wrongs resulting from thosedSi crees to the commerce of. the Uuiied Sure ; it wilrbsiTicitniVd v' i.tate. the prominent wroa' done by-the .3 I jarii'cle of . the Milan d - Cj-et. tssejaalyJeonsitedA, . ib?. ity 'gfkn to French ships of war andprivaleet s to make pr.e, the' cart of France. ' Without .waitiiiu- for -anv Itnowled of theiat -sea, of every neutral vessel, Jailing fe, Or from, any of ths .Eh- contl the mtricah g'iverinnent would Jak Ybe ihthpfity to capture".ras the very tsseye tish"ordersln couiicif, the l itnch Emperor Usued, on tlie I7(h pf 'of the-:,- It f.dlows therefore that- an ffictlih! retorathn r. December following, his. Milan 'decree, by which ".every-ship ofrred-iitt the. 'cuihi-ri 16 capture ihoalihe .. ffnfef;-.G'runt:h 44 whatever nation," which shall have suomTtted to search, by 3h therefore, for the sake of argument, twhaft-om.ils nature was cer 4 English ship, or to a voyage to fenglmd, t.r'p'id antax to that rtainlv not the case) that thtf noted letter of the Duke of Cddore .f govenim'f,"Wderlar lht r5th:tT Aattst; 1310) 11,1 forth a revocation, ytt was not that The British Island's, are declarVd in a Mate of bl ahd landi and ; tytty .ship of whatever nation, or 11 nature of its cargo 41 the EngTs.l colonies,' 44 and proceeding to 44 tries occupied hy ih'e Eoelibiu. li be goooVprize." The nature and extent cf these injuries Uius accumulated by mutual efforts of act of lit May t S 1 0,' alone ju- Unit edi jit s u issue- h is proc la m a - lockade, by sea rffectul revocation, for which the whatsoever the! thoused the President. of-tiie Ur ?a may be, that' sails from England, or tlros'e of, fion, utfai in tonirqutme jj that frtter,i!! authority to cajuuriniw nie's,' or of. countries occupied by English umpsiu:kd,f Ttie 'letter 'Itself, ia no annulment of this au hoii y t o Eiigjmd, or to the English colonies, or to-coun- j ca'pturt, "and it. is notorious that no evidehce of the tinnulmcnt of inp. fnrr.e. ' - . ' ' - - ' From the preceding statement it is apparent hat whatever there U nhJiiormhle. in the Di indole of the order cf May 1806, or in the . - i a . 1 .. . 1 . 1. . . I. . ,r L.t'lv.W l T 1 1 . . r. , .1' t - t.-ki. A mofiKOh ct.t.tmin flue practice under it, on greurru mertLy rvinciicun, u cannot ic aci ujj u);uiim-i, smuivu w . o .... - cni?;.;.r,t of war; for until France nointed it out.as'a cause ! important k;so;i; not to attach the cuse of bfs country toone, or ot controversy, it was so far from being regarded, as a source of any jthe other ; but by.-aysrenAfi-; and" sr.tid provisions! for sea coait new, or grievous cpmplatat, that it Was actually considered, by "our ; and maiiiimedtlence. to place it 'interests, as far as its situation. ' i government, inra favorable light. .. ano. resources pewnu, oeyoim mo tn wi iw i-ci.y, ui uwuuh ; The British orders in coun"cilare tbe remaining source of discon- ;,of any Eurojwan powtr. Happy would it have" net n for our coon- tent, and avowed cause of wat-, : TheseVhaveTHreltoBre; been con-jtiy, ifa course ol policy, So simplr and obvious, had tci-n adopted ! sidered, by our government in connexion with the French decrees, j Unfortunately atuninisti itiou had recourse to a system, compli Certainly, the British orders in council and French decrees, Tbrrn a 'cated in its nature, and des:rucUe in ts effects ; which, instead ol . '. .v! .',.,i,io -r- t-niicM,..,!. ,icf rpm.rlu rf t--lif from the ar.conitilated iniuries of iort-icn governments, served svsietri subversive iu ncuvi ai i ik1"-' - .-.v . r - - - ' , p . - ; . . - v ,f "Smniaint, yet, viewed rel.tivejy to the condition cf thoye powers lo-Ioniy 4o fill up, what waswantk-j-b tht rru.-e --ei..ad,f '"" ftUth aontui.ng act ever issued - ros each other, and of the United States towards both, the undelbramMaFemWmsiHents at hcne. m long ago, as the yearly br, net Emperor i Wejeany such rountcrmanding orders, t ,-d cannot persuade themselves that tbe orders in council, aa they 1794 j Mr. .Iadin, thepresent'President of the United States,! itvucw,-ever gt ven by the F rencb minister of jmrme ? , In ts, 'SVxist andwth theifpresent effect and operation, justify the se. then a member of the House of RepVe.eriati.es, devised and promising a t.ust, commuredto h.m,by the leglature, on a pemt s-, wTion of Great Britain as our enemy ; and render necessary a dc. ! posed a system cf commercial restneuons .tvhich had for its object j merest,ng to the ntutralccmmerce of the United States, rnd s.i 15 ,"n nfunnMahfiea war ' ' I the coercion of Gieat.fi.it.in, by a denial to her ol our p.oducts and important to the peace of The naon, was it net the duty cf the Pie - - '.' :-.:jJ..j trm.,ra1 rfntv.anr! nnlitieal rneflie'nre. seems! our' market r asset tins; that the former w;s.-io a manner essential Jl. vc I J v.. ........ j i r r - . i : , . . . -i--: -iTniVl K-tiifvtt. nnt tn mWiirlo in tKT-t hnn- to her nrosneritv. eilac ibis authority to captuqi, ever has been adduced. It has not even been, pretended. . Un rhe "contrary there is decisive and almost dc'i -ly evidence of the continued existence of tliis autliorily to 'cap. lure. ; ; , .; . '. The charge of executing the decrees bt Berlin arid Milan, va:: io fur as concerned his department, gicn by the terms of thes-i dtcrtes to the French minister of Marine.. Accoiding to est'iiblis'i ed principteS of gtnerai law, the imperial act, which gave tl'e'ao hortt'y nmst'-bt- annt-llsd by another impel ial act, equally forntai and solemn ; or at least, the authorial to. capture wust be counter manded by some order,or instruction from the miuUter of maiii.e. Nothing thott ot this could annul the aumority accorcing to i!u; to concur-in warning the United States, not to mingle in thh hope-! to her prosperity, either as ecess.vrie3 ol Site, or as raw m.tef.a.s lrsj ant', to human eye, interminable Ivuropean contest. Meitner ;'or ner manure-urea, u, i"1"""' iauCr, a gicui France r-or England, pretends. that ; their aggressions can be defend- j lion '-of her laboring classes.'could' not subsist. , " : ed e v the ground of any other belligerent right, than "that of parti- In that d?y of sage find virtuous forethought, the proposition was rejected, n rtmamco, uuwevc., u meiix uottai: piioc)iic Both attempt to justify tjitir encroachments, on the general .Iawanonfc,iti. active class o Arocrie poWiuuvns, v ho with a system of nations by the' plan "'of reta iation. In the relati ve position, arid . utic pertinacity inculcated among tht people, that commercial re. crfnortion of strength cf the United States, toother belligeren:, there strictions wete a rpve-es. of warbrerv-'htch would ensure success to beared UulclltWthyTthat wecould compcl.theoi.e, or the oUier,' the, United Statesnd humilution. to G cat-Brrtajn : - , bt hostile operations, to abandon this plea. - - j There were rwocutmnstances, uditrtnt m this system of cper And as the fiehl of "Commercial enterprise, after allowing to tbe-'cl-ig Great-liritsiiiby commercial restrictionawluch -ought to hav. K-.r'R.iirflrtiral noliiictans, very doubtful'of its rLsult't and verv catf. j.r-..!.!, ann nrnnrn. i r 1 1- i tiiii wt aijiiiiui .Aik v wi -j k vjia --vw v r - - . . . - . .a oa r-nto vvUtrr.m asWitriiioit to vield solid jnd lirui of its trial. These were the sae nl oiniiion' in rtla'ion ti ..,.-' 'valine, for unattainable pretensions. -The right of retahn- irs efheacy among ' tion, as cxi commercial meri, in the Ui-.tted States ; and the ei - . ... . . . ... .. . .-. .ff..i: .. ... ;k ;....i.i .;,iki. iv. ir. xisting, in either belligerent, jt wis impoabioie, tor tne V. siaic oitjing, mui a wv-n, "yy :x.:;, .v.;,vir.r,r iTSintv," or ioteresr. to'admir. Yet st'ith ! Great Britain. On the one hand. it was undeniable that the1, great ataies, wiia.iisui- vv... . ,i . .. . ,, . , T . , ., , ... , .- . was the stats of the decrees, ani brders of the respective bclligr-Jbody of commacnl men, in. the Untied Stntes, hau no behct in ts in relation to the rights of neutrals, that, while on the one ha..t.iuch adependente of Great-Britain, upon the United States, either it formed no iustification to either, so on the other, concurrent cir ! lor ourprcdues, of our market, as the system implied. , ' .. l iimstancesn formed a complete jus'iScation todhe'United StateSrkj !. Without the hear)y co-operation of this Class of . men, succcssnt) tnaintaininir notwithstanding these encroachments,4 provided it best its attempt was cbvibdsly uiiattaitiab!e.At:d as tin ihr.n the chief nnored with their interests, that system ot impartial neutrality, suffering wouiu . iaii ii was wwiuti wumhwuib- ichls so. desirable" to their peace and prosperity. -For if it should they would become co operating instruments in supp'; of any sys. in ihe Britiih intevtiu-eiice; with the" prohibiting in e importation, or-cenain spec,mo, mamuactnreJ sion of the priacipiesi'of blockade. Gieat-Britain, and heTr depndeqViss, on tl.u bVisibf-Mr.' :Mr?ison;s th neglect, on the part of the Uniie'origtotrrpr 1 Cmns:-or iii adoptit his principle ol i of ccmmereial hostility, against Great Bi it&in., 5 ' . ' , -f . : The decree of Betl.in. was issued in the, ensuing November, ddent to have iht evidence of such annulment, before the Usuin r-f any pro 'lamaiion I ll.is he aver insisted upon fuh evidei-c- ? Vas it of no constqaence in the relative situation jof this coiintrj-, is to f reign, powers, that, the regular evidmct should be .rteoie I by our admiiiistration and ni'adt krown ? Vv by has a ma;tcr of i -derce-, sa obviously proper, se simple in its riature, so level h. ei nerai apprehension and s viniptriously demanded, by the circ-ni-stances of the case,Mt-en wholly omitted ?. And why, if ths He ii v and Milan decrees are annulled, -as is prt tended, does ti e French' Emperor withhold this evidence of their annuimeiv ? VV"hy does hewj circumstjiicescf so much urgency ? .-.' Not onTy" has it never been 'pretended thiit any such imperial act oC'ann.Mlmet jia.s issued, orl thaoy such orders, or instructioi u, coontermanding the authority to capture, were ever given, but tlitve' is deeiJi've "evidence of the reverse iu the conductof the Frtncli public armed ships and.piivateers. AtH t-imf 's siiice N'v. 18 these ships and privateers 'have continued to capture our vessels and property, oh the h'igh .sea?,: upon the fif.ciples of the Berlin an i AlilAn decrees. A numerous list of Anieiicau vesstlv thus .take; , since the 1st of November 18Ky now txistiin the office of the se cretary tif state : and among-the -cpttres arc several "vessels w.ti their czrc-oeV, lately taken and destroyeci.'.-tt sea; vithout the fbr . moment cruizing against cur-commerce, under orders,4 givtiV by' the mfnibttr ot marjiie, to v.wbom Jthe extcution . of the decugs ; 'was temmitted'.. 'ani lhe!Iciussu;(r in j;mcary. l?.str.. In the Bal-- tic anu AjeuKerranean seas,' captures oy rrencn pnv:teers.nr.. "knov-.n .to us, by official documttlfei,.to-.b.aye' ieen- made" nnler .Cri t authorhy of these .decrees "Bow then ars tlisy revoked I , haye'thef ceaed6 violate our neutral commerce ? . - ; llad any repeal,' or modification of (hose deer&s, in truth taki : , plac-ie-it mutt have bien cdrimiiriicated to the prize "cout Is, an'V would have been evidenced. by spme'raitation either in their rub " or ih the piinciples of iheir. decisions." In vain,"' however, will fi i . nation seek for such proof of the revocation of fha decrees.- No tr 'l qmttal has.ever been had," .in anv of the prize "courls," cpcri ' Iground that ths Berlin and Milan decrees had ceased, eien as it respects lilt; wiutcu uuics. vii uc- tuouar ine cviucute. is aei sive that they arc considered by the French courts'as.exis'.ing. There are many cases corroborative otthis p;sition.-- It Is enoh;.!. to state, only, twe,- which appear in the cfficial reports'.? "The fc'. merican ship Julian was captured iry a 1 .'cncjy-priateer,ca. ii:6 4th July IS 11, and .on the tenth of Septernbf 1311, the vesisi l"'t cargo-was condemned, by-the Council of prizes at Paris anicnp 'o V thir reasonsscaftsie she wat visited byreve'ratJ2ngl&b yej'; inn- the colonial trade, and by. the Order of ii tahattou n-essed no acq y; Colony trade; or in any extehsion -n.L... -inert! -bee!, any such Stales,.as warrarted the i vencn emps.yi """"i" .,- h'I'' wi v. .. . . . ..l.,r.;or,f tk?ii ni-fteiided rit'ht. Iki Dast the r - retal.aUon,'ym 0.... . ' xlrava. (1806. 1 . The tfcaty, which had bTen signer at London, in-Decem r Alfth-u tKerfirte, lost the advaMgfcf whatever colofir the Bit-' ber, 1806, having en rejected by xMr. J.irson. without being ' Kh had offered to his pretences. NoC co,tent with adopt ng a prin- presented o the Senate; for rati ficaubn, and the ; non importation act ' " Se of retalbtion, in terms limited, and appropriate, to he idjury not being repealed, but only suspended,' Gtt aj her 'I r i. A, mm rlaimd. he declared, M; all the Biitish Idands, in a orders in councilvon the. Ihh -November, 8CT.f .: r J,;; ;r hlock:.de : -ptohibited all c:mmerce and corriipondence . On the-21t ol-the saine mo.t Wov. ampagny, Rrencn a w'.h them, ail lrde in thcirmanutacturts ; gnu r belone:intr to l.ncia.tid, or cofi t , . j v.u..f,.i. ,'ti,,, i'k L.n nf ihf-se encAaclimentsr'4 have eitiii rise toy - Js ldual by the insioioushess which they v ere pronudfrated. .The scope of the ejtprejliibns'cf the 44 of the injustice and violations of Enfe!and, t3OK, wt-h jhe whole "' V .. V y . .. ,,; ;.mi rrl wiilvki iis Inhere. the '4 continent, the part of Ruaranttetoe lt' therefiomi'r ,!rr vhohf commerce of neutrals with; Engliiid. Yet Dacfct, Minister Zr jir:i.'oster in Kis letter of the 3d of July .) 8 1 1 to Mr: Monroe, ' "'thus states the doctrine, maintained by his government. ,.' ,V- , : nw-aT:i1r1tatiTJ harneverBttcmpted to-dispute that. n thfiordi- .... r .- . H.J k i.lcliS.kl.A. nrv course of the law ol nations, no siocuaug i""".-","" d correspondence , On the 2 ISI ot tne same mourn oi iov., ynainpagny, r rencu made tvful prize ! minister yjf foreign affairs, wrote to Mr- smsirong the Ameri ming frf!m its jna. fca'ti. Minister,' in. the. wordsJoUowing. 4 A!l the tlifficuliles, which se encroachments h have given rise to your "'reclamations,- Sir, would be removed with V On the 17th-6t the tnsttlngcemberyfth.e.lilah decreewa's ssufcd'on tlie part of Uranus,- and five days afterwards the.ernliargw was passed on the part-of the. United States, fhus wa ed,'by acts nearly cote mporaneous,' , the circl-i of cdm Wai cpm pie tit nercial hos tilitiesr- ; After antneffecluai trial of four years to cbntroul the.policy'o'f " ,i !S- unlisit be supported by an 44 kdeale-liTrce iejUnetf to the two belligerents by this svSIem, it was on- the part of the United ru-fflatftiam V ""JZZ1 ' . . -. - ; r - . gave the authority, however to the President of the United States ' its Deration., ' . ' . ( . . v v , ; .- ..'iAi:.. t--...: l-, ;t-:1 Its. Deration.! ' -. - - J'-'-l Vl--i: 'r u'vkiu . in - tn revive lt"Waint Great Britain, in case France revoked her de- a MrFosteriri his letter ia ioiivuo ui iitv , ir. u. , iar,riv:!i nnt rnniinuft after the crees. , Such revocation,-on the part of Franco was dec.ared, by 4 also.says, ine th if -2d November, ieib,and,in conntqitence non-iniercoui,3e. was revivtd .ty. out aamtnisirauon, " Repeal of the orders in council unles his Majesty's gyVtrnment -the ,Fr.i shall think fit td sustain it by the specialppneal.ori of a; snlT.cfent conwqner naval force, and the Let of Vs being scontm jed, or txt, wd! hagn. G On the same day the Hercules an'- Ameiiran ship was horirePir,Vi by the imperial court of prizes, allqj,tftg '1i;vt it ' wvu, .irApoi!.!e, that she was not visttedjby the .enemy's - "shins of vAr.'v So (' m :jT to tlitnvwai'thV existence of the decrees, ar-d-such 'their , eageif f-J to give:. them tftect' against our commerce, tkp.t thtjr teig'reij a'.v;-t-' ' This article is in these rords ; . . '. t' 44 An. l2. The British islands' re declared to be Hz stave of Milockade, bol'iihy. land and sea. Evtry sbfp of whatever -4 or whatsoever the nature of its cai.c.3 may be, that sais from . 4 port3 of England, or those cf tht -'English, coldftiis nrid '.of ''.-.s ''' "' 44 counties occupied hy Fnf'liih troopt find p.-or eedirg tA Frgl i';' - . 44 Or to the English Colfmicv oc to c cuntVits cccupicd bv EfiRL- " troops is Rocu anu rawiuv jrif, r con rafy to tne preeent i;- cirtst GrearBritaih. - ' , - . w-.' j'4 and tesiifttureJi htf.ur ihiit tvar'iir hur-Jitivatcftl aiui- At till" uint.5, thr: 'undersigned have.lo'ok, with much anstety' udgaT ti jtie tafitor .;.- ' ' .r... 4 4 notified at ths time,' r. :';;Jv i