North Carolina Newspapers

V-r" I r r 1 f , 41 VOL. XXVII 1. ;.i I t J Jff -THE- . 1 fier Offered ia this Town. -ON- I WILL aUtMIXCB A Brud Sweepu g Cieannc Oat Bate Oar Intttw ef (M& ? mi fi-.f,i,u '1 i .i.;, 4iC tri!;M WWclos' Maui. -iilli. ! U P'iiJ. i7tH K . --.wh ant MS am. Ma B4S0hUa t avDoUaMkVtaadJ-aUde niaai IIlia jtlmwtm. ttm i ci2 kaBasawf Way. Iv. 27 Stock a aaJfg.r '-,v-rr-r- '. 1 A. I i r ' VI Vmuiusuisa asjsaasi WD fLSiVta I . . rsi x l . g-- -m -a -Ht m l.i All v ' T il iSs.taJha'ahiarsss. Jft lMtrtct) axwisd I -as sal Alexander 6 Hiirfei grs CSaotts, (Nothing, &c BAIL! OF New Goods! Another lot ot those Beautiful Bilk and For Lined CIRCULARS, p WALKING jackets, dolmans, &c., PER EXPRESS THIS MORNING. We hare a handsome line ot WOOL PLUSHES Ia Black and Colors. Bvemhlng new lsf NECK WIAR. Ask to see our BLANKETS, V bare another atack of mrnntwiiTi in.t to- Come and see as and be convinced that we have the most eomolete stock nf amuim tn h found anywhere. Respectfully, nma T. L. 82IGLE A CO. h i 9 t A cold lor sr tltroM mar not seem to mount td much, and If promptly attended to ean easQr be cared; but neglect is often nuowed by coanunpttoB or dlphtherlau ho mertlrtne has ever been discovered which - acts so otoUv-and rarely in such cases aa PKRHY DAVIS' FAIN KILLKTha prompt use of this imotuobU ramad baa saved thousands of ores. PMBT DAVM' PAIN UTTT.T.frR (g SJissqserlmant. It has been before the pubno forforty- y-eafs, and la moat valued where tt la best known. ' A tew-axtracta from voluntary togMmnmniff read aitoilowa: , . Paw Kaun hasten my household remedy far Mrer known it to fall In effectinir L. 8. Gloom. Wllllamnrlll. W " pw nrenty-aeran yean, and ha TO a cure. For thirty years I haro used Paw Ktllsb, and tpand tt a new-f aillnsr remedy for colds and aora fcroat-ifiArnxo tamii. . Hare received ImmadUts relief from ooldi and ffw.thr and eonatdw your Paih Killks an hmhiabtartme(lyMU&KT8 i hv mat noorered from a Try gcvere cold. WnlCD I nmrfl nan rru. antn thm T rymM nun uuiu x inaa t Saiy.I oar P. 'atm Kn.T.aa, which reiiarod ma litmifirtiato wiu nerer again oe forty raama Lcwia. WunMhnra Oa BOM I begin uaing- Paik Killxs In my family twenty- years ago and have used It ever since, and have forod ao toedlclnato take its plaoa, &W. Dxxx, vroggiat, Oneida, N. Y. 'jTeg'whewplna' Bwajt'SBd'eroTO ft Is the beat Separation mad. W would not) without it m, it. nuuri4jiuflnT auiia, va.p ;i ' rorantg-ajrayari vbave vsed fain ktixkb ?foreonaoa.ii piu , ase oanaider it the beat sTo!Tz7" t waa anfflug pi , ' witk bronchitla, and my throat waa ao inflamad I eoold acarcely swallow but woo. a waa aqyiaaa to jxj yonr nuiia, and..aftajr takma a few doses was completely - nuauiaoir. AsToa wrltee from Ooahoeton: Toor Paxv l enraa dlDhthcrla and aora throat, aoalarm- ' prevalent here, and baa not been known to instance. Xhia fact you should ft- :. rtW sen was taken to call fadnaaday hla throat was dear. It waa a won- lav Ha wraa takan on flnndav. and on m oora, ana i wtan tt codm ds mown to sua f tjaahwhoaraloaaonuany childjen, or chUls and Fever PAJjv kxiTXaSR has awequaL It cures when ererythlng else falls. Delays are often dangerous. A bottle of Pam KiTJjrain the house la a safeguard that DO family should be without. An druggists seU it at SOc, and $1.00 ar bottle v PWRY DAVIS A SON, Proprietors, " Providence, R. I, Mptdtv teptft oet , . .r r- i THE JEWELER, HAS JCBT BXtUSNXD FBOM THE NORTH. r iirsTe Moarr select. wot com plete mm best assorted f STOCK OT Watches, Clocks and Jevyelry, Silver and Plated Ware, Zrer displayed ki NORTH CAROLINA1 Bsctrtf AcpKiaar. st es 10 Diyr Trial. T0f.!Efl 0F1LY, tOUMQ OB OLD, "X I f HO are affarmf from Vaavous DaatUTT, W . Los Tctautv, Lack of Kbatb foaca avs Yieo. WAaaVJM WBAUraaaaa, aad aH those diseases Of a PareAfaATPaw taaTilrlar from AJcaa and OnM0avsaaVvpedrraUef aad oplaa recto ration of HaAum, Vioea aad aUirao 6 VAaAWRan. Tae grandest discovsif of tho Nineteenth. Oeatory. Sand s onoa for Illustrated rampalstXraa., Aadreas t?lTA18 KIT CiMAEsMAUrUltH. fffWWWWWBrF"JP"Wa t AMUSE- tA iti ftd .01 jigurf j-I3Ja . : . . lM&i'M.mfVT . ITvt A AJA. I t Kenthlyand season tickets for sale-: Apply ta nanaser at e Ms, 8. lffju ARRIVAL DiDbtberia. wi m avamgM tEETORE ;AND it- AFTEH1 .Jill iilTtiT'iin i iiiiwuii mi ati sin i in tsj.afct r-i,snff'j j imps h; fYr-,v'J '' SUPREJUE COURT DECISIONS. Fall Term, 1882. Reported for the Observer by Walton M. Busbee. No. 290. Davis vs. Higgins Buther ford. Smith, C. J.: The complaint asserts that the plain tiff is owner in fee and entitled to the possession of the land described and withheld by the defendant. The an-, flwer denies these facts and thereupon trite issue is submitted; with ah Inquiry of damages dependent upon the find ing. "Is the plaintiff the owner and entitled to the possession of the land maintained in the complaint." Jin the argument, plaintiffs counsel disclaimed any right to recovers part of the land containing 27 acres. The jury reured and afterwards cam into court and in quired, if they could return a verdict for the whole tractor for a part; they were instructed that if their yerdict was for the plaintiff it might be1 genera al or special, setting out what part be longed to him and if the defendant was in possession of any part of the plain tiff's land be would be entitled td recov er and "would take out his writ bf poev session at his peril, if theif verdict was for the plaintiff without further speci fication." The jury responded! in Jthe affirmative to the issue and that no damages had ' been sustained, j The court being of the opinion that the in struction as to the effect of a general verdict was erroneous, directed the verdict to be set aside and awarded a new trial, from this order pi an tiff 1 ar peals. The court says: That a matter put ihlissue and material to the result is conclusively determined by the verdict1 and judgment when land is sought to be recovered as it would be if the recov ery of personal property was the object of the action. Where both the plead ings and the issue involve the determ ination of title and consequent right of possession in the plaintiff and this is distinctly and definitely decided ! in the verdict, it could not thereafter be drawn in question by the defendant and becomes res adjudicata of record. No error. Affirmed. Falls vs. Gamble, 66 N C, 455. Isler vs. Harrison. 71 N C, 64. Gay vs. Stan cell, 76 N C, 269. Yates vs. Yates. 8i N C, 897. Fuller vs, Harrell, 85 N C, 456. Cited and approved. No. 192. Jackson, Adm. vs. Shields, et ala. More. Ruffin. J. : The case comes up on the defendant's appeal from the courts overruling his exceptions to the report of the referee, who was appointed to ascertain the facts and report bis conclusions thereon in the case of the defendants of record, who are the next of kin of Cornelius Shields deceased, and Jackson who was appointed his administrator in eighteen hundred and fifty-seven. 1. The referee finds that under the decree rendered in 1860 there was $416.10 due the defendant, Robt Shields. There is a balance still due him of $28 54 and interest from the 1st of Oc tober 1860 be is entitled to have exe cution against the plaintiff for the same. 2. There is nothing in the evidence or the findings, to show that the de fendant Cornelius Purvis, had any knowledge of, or in any way gave his sanction to the payment of the $50 which was paid into the Clerk's office, in Confederate money, for him. The case falls directly within Purvis vs. Jackson. 69 N C, 474. 3. Where an administrator collects bonds which bare interest and does not keep any account of the amount collected, he should be eharged with interest during the whole period. See Fich vs. Bagland, 2 Dev Eq 187. As the plaintiff is charged with interest on the whole amount letained in his hands, it would be improper to charge him with interest on certain particular bonds as tbey are included in the large amount . Error. Judgment accordingly. No. 230. Hawkins, et els, vs. Hughes and wife. Vance. Rtjffin, J. : Plaintiffs, who were judgment credit ors of the defendant, allege that the male defendant purchased certaid lands from one Kittle and procured the deed to be, made to his wife in order to con ceal bis interest in the land and with draw it from the satisfaction of his debts and thereby defraud his creditors, thereupon tbey ask that feme defend ant be declared a trustee, &c. : Defendants say that ' the 4and was purchased by the husband as agent, for the wife and with money belonging to, her separate estate. The jury found that it was purchased by the husband and paid for with his own money. The plaintiffs moved for judgment, but the defendants moved in arrest upon the ground that the plaintiffs should have sought relief not by an independent ac tion, but by supplemental proceedings in the original cause. Motion overrul ed; Defendants appealed. ' The court says: Conceding theboints to be against the plaintiffs and that they not only could, but should; have -sought their reliet by proceedlnga sup plementary, still ft w&s tod fate for the defendants to make their objection af ter the verdict. A party cannot have the benefit of a plea in abatement upon a motion in arrest of judgment The pending of a former action is strictly a matter of abatement and must, under the old system of pleading, have been specially pleaded, and under the new must be set up iu the answer, or in some ;way insisted on. before a trial of the taeritS; if Hot so done, is considered to H tfce 'objection been taken in time siinh ia the disfavor with which the law reeards a multiplicity of actions-" it-mighthave availed so far as to dis miss tha plaintiffs action. :' ; J Nd error, Affirmed. : - Distinction drawn between ptesent case and Hinsdale vs Sinclair, 81 N O,!t 838. Cases cited : Smith vs Modre, 79 N C, 82; Winfield vs Burton, 79-388; Waltdns Wan6n!,J 80-26; Braueh vs. Houston, Busb. 85. JiyersAnd wifa,va.B&D R R-Guil- Rtjffin, J.: This action is brought to recover dam acres for personal injuries sustained by feme plaintiff while traveling on a pub- lift highway, land alleged to have been caused Vj aerenaani s negligence, ine facts are that the feme plaintiff, while traveling-ioj buggy from her home to Thomasvitle, was forced to cross the defendant's track at a point neat said town, unon a bridge which had been. hitherto cjnfllffHCted boa& defendant: xne unugtt who cikui icdi iuuk buusia- teen feet wide. On the day of the acci dent the section. master had , hands em rjloved on the Iroad befL-arid.was using a damp car. which was loaded and 4 weighed about fifteen hundred pounds'. There were two red flags on the car use i for aisnalinae train.? Tkia dump car had been placed upon the bridge;men-'l tioned.ana tne piainurrs Duggy in cross- . v,i Kriora. atrHrWrfhnrainb ir. rcaus- ofse be came frightened, ran away and threw the plaintiff from the buggy .causing her lo sustain serious injnriear The answer of defendant denies thatn.he plaintiff was iniured because of its negligeice.or that ofany of its MTfsnfal jff The !Jtfd t tretJaredhe-fdliawinrf anert I. was tneTrspaceiei6 upon tne bridge sufficient for the plaintiff i with thtrffcthAii 'ligence-'of defendant?' $. 'at jdam ages did sne sustain r- After argument, his Honor announc ed that he had concluded to hvtM CHARLOTTE, N. C THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 30, out their considering any mixed ques tion of law andfactand theiefore with drew'the issues prepared, and substitu ted others. The plaiutiffs excepted to the changftbf issues as made, also to the sufficiency f the substituted issues, and tenderedother issues, which were rejected by the court. After verdict, judgment was' rendered that the de fendant go witftout dayi Plaintiff ap pealed. t . The court aya: The issues as re sponded to present the plaintiffs case I solely with Teierence to defendant's friafht trt '.use- the finghway and makn it. l.tojdepend upontheingie question. whether the user uiouni,ea to a partial "or complete obstruction of the high way across the bridge, thus excluding ail inquiry as to defendant's negligence in putting into the highway an object likely to alarm the horses of persons passing, which inquiry is material to the plaintiffs' right of action and fairly raised by the pleadings. t - A person may be responsible for put ting into a highway objects likely to frighten horses of ordinary gentleness. In as much as It is neither unnatural -f or unusual ior horses wnen traveling to become frightened at extraordinary noises or sights therefore he who, upon a road traveled by horses, makes such noises or exhibits such spectacles is lia ble for any damage caused by -their taking fright The responsibility of de fendant in this action depends! upon the question Whether the use 'which it was jxijfking'of the highway at the time Of the mishap was a reasonable one or not v Tbe issues submitted touch only one chase-nf the plaintiffs1! case, and inraue-to then thatthe other should be passed upon also - j r . f . r ; (v i JError. Venire de n&vo. "Wharton's Law of Negligence, Sec. 107 and 836. Jones vs Railroad Co, 197 Mass, 261, cited. Sumrow vs Black and wife Mecklen burg. - Ashe, J.: This was a motion to dissolve a re straining order theretofore made, re straining an execution issued upon a judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants at spring term 1877. In 1878 defendant filed his petition in bankruptcy.and in 1879 was adjudicated a bankrupt, and received his discharge from all debts and liabilities existing against him prior ta the 29th of August, 1878. The plaintiffs name was omitted in the list of sworn creditors. The mo tion was allowed in part, and defendant excepted. , The court says: The plaintiff has no right to enforce the lien by an execu tion on defendant's land, and though the judgment was rendered and dock eted prior to the 29th of August, 1878, the lien created was discharged by the adjudication of bankruptcy. All the property of a bankrupt, as well as that which is subject to mort gages and liens as that which is unen cumbered passes to the assignee and is in custodia legis, to be administered by the assignee, subject to liens and priori ties; and all claimants against the es tate, however evidenced or secured are required to prove their debt, and the bankrupt court is the proper tribunal to administer remedies for the enforce ment of liens. The refusal of the court to dissolve the injunction as to the property owned by defendant upon which plaintiff had a lien on the 29th August, 1878, is erron eous. Error. Reversed. Blum vs Ellis, 73, 293; Withers vs Stinson, 79, 341; Dixon vs' Dixon, 81, 323; Knabe Co vs Hays, "71, 109. Ap proved. A. T. & O. Railroad Co. iii North Caro lina, vs. M. E. Alexander and Board of Commissioners Mecklenburg. Smith, C. J.: , The case presents the question wheth er the plaintiff company is liable to be assessed for State and county taxation upon the value of its corporate fran chise and road bed. In 1852 the General Assembly of Ten nessee passed as act incorporating the A. T. & O. Railroad Company for the purpose of constructing a railroad from the waters of the Atlantic to the Ohio River, traversing the States of North Carolina, Virginia and Kentucky The 37th section exempts the capital stock from taxation forever; -the road; with all its fixtures and appurtences, includ ing workshops, warehouses and vehicles of transportation shall be exempt from taxation for the period of twenty years from the completion of the road, and gives the company full power ahd au thority to purchase and own such num ber of shares as may be necessary for the construction of said road and keep ing the same iu repair; which shall likewise be exempt Cfjttm taxation. This enactment is recitediii the act of incorporation passed in this State 15th February, 1855. . The 5th section allows the company five years in which to be gin the gradation and fifteen years in which to finish the road and put it in operation. ' In February, 1861, an act was passed which in its title is denominated "an act to amend" the act of incorporation, therein incorporating, the stockholders residing in North Carolina under the name of the A. T. & O; Railroad Com pany in North Carolina. In Bank vs.. Charlotte, 85 N C, 433, the opinion of the court was declared to be "that the amending statute if not an abrogation and substitution of another company in place of the former, nevertheless effects such fundamental changes as are equivalent in. -their legal conse quences." It is manifest that their own citizen stockholders and the new or ganization lsnMrea?rl ahd renjoy all such pnviges.ana Denetits as are be stowed in-; the original act and must succeed to all the privileges and immu nities conferred in the original charter, in the like manner as to the powers ne cessary to the completion of the work. Two i subsequent acts, authorized an assessment r upon the ( shareholders to raise means in furtherance of the work, and provided for ah "exchange of ! State bonds for those of the company to the amount of two millions to: raise needed funds for the same. Private acts 1868, ch 2tT Acts 868-9, cn .31. ,The 37th section, of the Tennessee act enures to the benefit of plaintiff, as it did to the original company, and it is entitled to the exemptions liierein, provided.; ; ' :,i The present road was finished in 1862, between its present termini, it it com pleted and as such its exemption ex pires under the act in twenty years, to wit, 1882. The assessment' now en forced is within the letter of the act and forbidden upon .any -construction of Its I terms! ,' But the franchise, as a distinct ? piece of .! property ,f rom any enumerated; is not embraced in the words of the section ahd is a subject of taxation not included in the exemption; The collection of the tax as levied: upon the roadbed should have been 'restrain ed by the court; while th sheriff should be left free to collect that imposed upon the franchise, the value of which is ap portioned; Acts 188 1, ch 117, see lL Errors Order of in j auction modified. Railroad vs Brogden, 74 -N 0, 707: Beld 1 -vt commissioners, 84. &04 ; nanroaa ys Commissioners; 72, 10, cited. j .Miller, Administrator, vs.-Pharr Means neeutow et. ais.-sieeKien- RuFFiN, J. : i ..This action is brought on the on.d of Caldwell as constable, t&0 sure ties and consUbie are ootn dead and the defendants'. ar their xecutora.i The plaintiff, alleges ..that he put- several 'claims" intd the constable S hands for; oiieeuon,f mat . ne couectea tnem and failed to pay over the prceds, jThat be failed to account for the evidences of debt when demanded of him. After official note on Giliton, Glover & Elias, A justice's docket was introduced, show ing an entry of judgment for plaintiff and this entry "debt settled, costs paid into office." Plaintiff asked the court to charge "that if the entry upon the justice's docket meant that the con stable retained the amount of the debt and only paid costs into the office, the jury should find for plaintiff, as to this debt, as there was no evidence that he ever paid the amount to plaintiff. The court declined to give the instructions. Verdict and judgment for defendant Held. The note was merged in the judgment and was properly accounted for by proof that it was on'file with the papers in the justice's office. When El ain tiffs Own witness declares that he ad received payments on ' the claims from time to time until he thought that all had been paid that could be collected on them and he so declared to defend ants when he made a demand on them after the constable's death, it would be manifestly improper for the court to have instructed, that there was no evi dence that the amount due on this par ticular note had lever been paid to plain tiff. No error. Affirmed. Gregory vs. Hooks, 11 lnd, 371, cited. Hilton vs McDowell et als Mecklen burg. Ruffin, J.: In this case a single exception was taken in the court below, and in this eourt that one was so faintly urged by counsel as virtually to amount to its abandonment. The only question is whether plaintiff, by his proofs of the partnership, had prepared the way for the admission of the declarations of one of the parties as evidence against the other. Held. When the declarations of a party furniBhes evidence of the fact that he is jointly interested with others, it is incumbent on the Judge td deter mine the question, at least so far as to say whether there was such prima facie evidence of the copartnership as to ren der competent the declarations of one against the other, and from his decision as to this there can be no appeal. No error. Affirmed. The court once more calls the atten tion of the bench and bar to the manner of stating cases on appeal, and urges upon them the propriety of making their statements less cumbersome than they sometimes do. In the above case, the counsel having disagreed among themselves, it devolved upon the Judge who presided at the trial to prepare a statement for this court, and instead of a simple summary of the evidence, which was all that was needed to pre sent the only point raised, there )s sent up. as part of the record.a detailed state ment of the entire evidence, covering 12 tntire pages, all of which the court was compelled to scrutinize, to see whether other exceptions were not taken. A proper consideration of the additional expense, and the needless consumption of the time of the court, ought to induce t somewhat more of care in this regard, to say nothing of the unseemly appearance which the records of the court are made to wear by such a mass of useless matter. X0tfcertes. " we do hereby certify that we tuptrvise the ar rangements for all the Monthly and &&ni-Axrwal Drawings of the Louisiana Stale Lottery Company, and tn person manage and control the Drawings themselves, and that the same are conducted with honesty, fairness, and in good faith toward all par ties, and toe authorize the Company to use this certifi cate, with facsimiles of our signatures attached, in its advertisements." Com m las f oners. UNPRECEDENTED ATTRACTION ! OYSB HALF A MILLION DISTRIBUTED. Louisiana : State Lottery Company Incorporated in 1868 for 25 years by the Legis lature for Educational and Charitable purposes with a capital of Si, 000.000 to which a reserve fond of $650,000 has since been added. By an overwhelming popular vote its franchise was made a part of the present State Constitution adopted December 2d. A, D. 1879. Its GRAND 81NGLB NUMB SB Drawings will take place monthly. It nerer scales or postpones. Look at thefoL owlng Distribution: BRAND PBOBaEXADH CONCERT, during which will take place the 151at Grand Tlentlily and the Eitraordinary aifrAMflul Draw t AT NEW ORLEANS, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19th, lSSS, Under the personal supervision and management of Gen. G. T. BKAUBKQAKD. of Louisiana, and Gen. JUBAL A EARLY, of Virginia. CAPITAL. PRIZE, ,100,000. lT" Nona? Tickets are Ten Dollars only. Halves, S3, fifths $2. Tenths, Si. LIST OF PRIZES: 1 CAPITAL PRIZE of SI 00,000 - SI 00,000 , 1 OBAND 50,000.. ! 50,000 i 1 GRAND " 130,000.. -20,000 2 LARGS PRIZES of 10,000-. 20,000 4 " 5,000.. 20,000 20 PRIZES Of 1,000.. 20,000 20 - 500.. 26.000 100 ' 800.. .80,000 200 200 . 40,000 600 100.. 60,000 lOiOeo - , io.. looooo - ' APPROXIMATION PRIZES. 100 Approximation Prtiies of $200...... $20,000 100 Approximation Prizes of 100..... 10,000 100 ApproxlffLatloa Prizes of rsr.4 I 7,500 1 1,279 Prizes, amounting to 8522,500 Application for rates to clubs should only be made to the office of the company in New Orleans, For aWermation apply to . .w, . , m. A DAUPHIN. : '-a.J.v. New Orleans, la. or M. A. DAUPHIN. r U; Seventh street, Washington, D. q. N. B. Orders addressed to New Orleans will re ceive prompt attention. 1 ' novi .!!'! 2pvi:l lX tn !$!)! n: i'.MH -POPBLAfc HQNTBXataORAvWJNfl THE ' " In the lty of Louisville, on THURSDAY, NOVEMBER SOtH, 1882, TTiese drawings oecur monthlr (Sundays except ed) under provisions of an Act of the General As sembly ot Kentucky. The United Botes Oreutt Cmftt aa Mann 81, rendered Uie following decisions: 1st That the Commonwealth Dlstnbatlon Com pany Is legaL 2d Its drawings are fair. The Company has now on hand a large reserve fund. Bead the hst of prizes tor the i ' ... ..j NOV11IB1B DRAWING. I ' Frl,.ii.Vi.s;...wA.2.;.w $80,000 ; 10,000 , il ifr . at W-k , 1 Prize, I(y Prtees, $1,000 eaeh,. 20 Pibes, 1 1 600 eacJi,. . lev trnxes, 1 1 puu eaojt,, 100 Prlxes,! lMiach, 10,000 200 Prizes. bu e&en. 10,000 12,000 10,000 ; . 20 each,.........;. .10 each.' ' yuurnze. PTtoes,$300eacn,ApproAlinaaonPrto PrizML. nn ' C r",-a 9 Prizes. ,700 9 Prizes, 1.960 f Wlula Tickets, tar Half -TIeke, tl f tWx' -fiemttlloaeyor Pvik IrsAltilfefier''rm4 &FvvwBaav, -DON'T srS&'-.VI'-EZMBTt.J niR OB POSTOFiiCJ CiDiX- Orders of So and upward, by Kxprass, can be sent at our ex pense. Address ail orders to - - -. , . . 1882. ffK BATE JtTST RECElVEDX171RCa3 XINE Walking Jackets, Cloaks w We still have a few handsome DRIES PATTERNS (htX we wGlseD chftp. The iuUiib of All-fool Caslimeres from 45c UStliP City. i .... . BA9KRT JLANNXLS m setrtotand all dskltablt shades. ; . : Ladies' (loth Fliincds, RepclantsT and Suitings, PLU3HS3, YJti,VaT3, BILK.&, SATUtSSU&AHS and OTTOMANS. , . . -v ' 1 " ; . f - . : - . BROCADES, all colors. MILITAB BBAID UNDERWME l 1 .H(aK :t" Can't be excelled. We have a large line of Handsome BL AXKXTS, QQILTS and DOMRSTIC GOODS cheap. One of our Firm ta now lb the Northern Markets iarlna In a large 8SCOND STOCK an1 our counters and shelves wtil soon be laden with all the novelties the market affords. A( call will convlnoe jou tnat we are HSADQUABTIB9 and It we do no26 LfiERlIuEfiJIfl., Leading Clothiers and Tailor$T New Goods! Correct -:o: flurPatrons: The People; Oar SluJj:Their Interest. Oitf Maiiiar Fair Dcaliog. OUR REWARD: SUCCESS. WX Manufacture our own Mes's CHotfabig, and other house can offer tae same woods. We ea sweat oi xuLa.Aii-.ai axis In this sectlen. OUR Turnlshlng Goods Department comprise the latent ont,nd W are eontldent that for beauty and novelty will ooanpsre with any In the South. The. last tot .not, leas V or Bat Depart ment, consists ol only the latest out. and finest tbat could be found In the market ' We have taken special pride this season to secure such goods that cannot be found elsewhere. Our prices In each and every department are Invariably bottom figures, and every article sold with our guarantee 3T" Thanking the publlcklndly for past favors, and soliciting a share of your trade 1n the future, we are Very Respectfully. T Berwcvugjer &3 Bro., oetl leading Clothiers and Tailors S?-SSs' .4.,: EC v .tnjj, . m . , h iFj Lfj I . i I S ; W j mJZ 'iaaasaf' ' 'U.;lll!tilL T O I'm? 'SJ F:1""' (ft lj .... c p-- ' IHi ' - " w' fef JTlsV s Mi CI!) ill ,J j-.i .b.iUi'vsH lifjv :'.u Q I SlRiPli aaawmaaaaaaaiias 9 i a1 a -i CO o aa S 3 S aaaa, m r , 4 j Zs 52; S. CP?-, t . i r"i- t.- ., & & 9 TVk , i . 3 ert3 ig The. LARGEST dhttnleStttck of . mm m mm m . mm , , mm I Jt ill . mmmm H .I M2BW iAi ii ifu ii, srvi 4 ww. i U l Ai. .iJAl ill- t.'ul a t aAIJLdsC) -TT- -v TA MisTT AliAVJJVdL T " 4. 6 S V,11 nkrs. and LOOPft Our eteesvof . Ladles' at d Gentb' net stU you U b jow iault. . Hargraves wii :oi :o: - .' v . ( ' : . . i . I'll Doim Ttsnti sit netm. Smilib'Bidldin East Traio Street. Styles ! Closest -:o:- therefore eaa sell at macs lower prices thsnsnr are now prepared to offer the largest and best assort- fllj4 TU w i.u.xl l 159 H O CP H to a g H H mm t3 I , LJaataui . , .' t . 5. Saf BA J a t S3w- 8 '.-yit4X;: WISH) nfl Prices sSSSp3ai--H ef Sji m B5- Ei 'Sl20i M mmmmSL4tl 4as4awaiyaWsisf fPjJs4Y si ills iil ,VVp rrctxltt vta TfJ i Ji masaLT. mar a tmtf ijim i VUMJittl T .tfiora ;iiio a Hill m Uil OOO.OITs LTllaSi A.UJL1 aV W IPS' J . ..!.. fl..v ai,t3 FJ.f 1 ' - I . I