: I I - r irf 1 1 1 i r ' I "r i- i Li,.,. .. ... ... ; : -. r : ? : : ! '
' ' ' I - - II .
NO;4,276.
""""Js
" . jut?" ,..jw
is,. .
A PRETTY.
JLHAJf,
SILK HAT,
FOR--
AT--
:p: &-:c:
II YOU WAKT A PBETTY PAXB
ft
-or
GENTS' SLIPPERS"
FOB 1 CHRIS IMA a PRESENT,
Yon Can Find Them at Rot it Go's.
A FULL LINK Of.
SOFT I STIFF HAJS
ALSO -
1 I
.1 3
dec!7
3T. ua on Lin nwi
'a
.mm -4 . "1
23
w- I
vi ajA
Mm a a &
' It'Ot
n s i ii : " r -r i r
' i il TT Ii :
.t.H-WiW ?ii-3 iH 7
"Ml. i!t SW,Ji
- A woh
5
8 '.;s-jl tl J?9 1 i
iiil yi?a.t
S k l;mlipp
Mllll U JJ.1 A L V
Christmas Pill
PEERltC'Si
-t . ... -k M jb, w mm
j ' a I Patn Killir in the house Is a safeguard Ipai?
. r . ia L'r I so family should be without. . ,'J
-'. L iyF. r : 1001.
rrtyv oft
L sept dw sept & occ
7 v3 fifitoRVAkiM
"V OF STJfTAtrsr j
p-H r.UB WHOLE 8X00: 3 BlfiN OPBNEli
i . . w,up and everything 1 now on eW(brrjoan
K mioltoBUerjm9onal)lei Weliayr 1-13ru-
P 777) ' -' "'-'-''rt' '-:'",yf,:
L Or r ' - ' BTE8 MADI Bf tJHABLQTTE.
u, , n lj t "s1' " w fr rrrrrcr -q
I
m
77)
n ..rrr , . ttiiiT !'
J.
4W
J
XMisiLGoodsl
WHEIOCU Kii OUT LOOKING for the
. .. ,.r r I
GOING O N IN TIT JS CI T Y,
CALL INLAND SSE - -
J
..a . v.
If you can't fla
something la Our fii
iet cheap
enough to bay.
We do not offer all oar Stock at Cost, btil
will sell you a great many Goods cbeap.and If you
will COMPILES GOODS and PftlClES we think we
an CONVINCE YOD that we wlU
ill
SELL
Our Stock f XMia GOO
Is APmlng la
every day, and when you want something
some wr ajiao r x. vat ana
Stock and yo wHl find X3O0D3-nd P
BIGHT. Yery Eespectfully,
T. lu Sejgle, A, Co.
.I a 7- -tH'i
de8
i A oU or mm tliroat maT rJit im tn
unoont to rnuco, and U prompUy attended
to can easily be icuredP but neglect la oxtr
(Cq medlclnfl has rer been dlaoorered whlcn
PCRRT DAVIS' PAIK TTTT.T.Tm la
- , wt aaxpertnMt. It has been before the
'publlo Jor firtt rars. and la most Talued
where it ra Best known.
A few extracts from voluntary tatimnniaia
eolda for tboput twenty -mvii yeum. aadTMm
Mtw known It to fail in affecting'-4 caie.
E JBj qjoaaa, WllliaiMTille, N. Y. "
Tae tbirlgr ywn I,hT iued-kiKix4a, and
d 1 m TfjUing' Bsnway for oolda and aoxe
MWMWAumui fmM f
xiBTa r
i raoairad laomi
rallaf from sold and
ora thrrmt. and eoncidr rnnp Pin Iit.m
Tanble ramedjv-OBO. B. Inun, rckinaon,
Jtw raeprarad from a Tarr aaMne cold, .
which I hava had for aoma tima. J could get no,
aaUef rmtu I triad your. Vjam Ihjob, whick -Miiaad
ma tomadlaly.I wUl Avar again be
with9i it -r-X O. JToKca, LoVnd, O.
, Hairs taad Patx Kiujuain my fainijy for forty
(efaaaa, Mar kuowav U toa.-0UX8Oi
Lawn, Wayneaboro, Ga. ;
I began naing Path Knxn ln my f amlly twenty.
&y years ago aniiave naad itereraincejtnd hava
For whooping-eonghi and croup it im the beat
. Vtwaaty-a yaaITeuaMPArirKnxi4 I
lor eolda and chapped lip, and conaldar It th b4 1
- -medifliM ever oflared. -GJioorxjWiliniiAtoi I
, lu,T2l
- throat waaO laflamed rtf iawy awallow
aaTload. I. waa adviaad to try.
LM IILLHi
apoaataly -
Koajumktuui m lew (a.
TonrTm
Kryi.Mai cea.tr uiao
UUll (a..'Ti MkU ra roaaaoalann.
bwiy-lMTaleotr
fall in a aiog)
maka known To 1
lore, aao naa-veroaan xnown 10
haa nut liiin
ice. Xhw fact yea anoald
th woriA
.Mia. luh B. MAoif writs
Ilr arm.waa taken n A.
T vlQlastlf aick with diphtheria, high fever, and cold . I
euniL Hf many children have died bjuw, I was'-
KM. He wu tikn ftnndat. and on
Wadneaday hia threat waa dear. It waa a vfciM3
cure, ana x wiko coma Mjcnewn jsyina7
ijrno aiisjamg ap xmut couaren.
.4A -fkAm Hit KTT.T.iriH-fTft!i
" area.wemeveryhiig; eisetalht v
are onen aanGrerona. a i Dotue oi
Patn KiLLinin the house Is a safeguard
no family should be without. ,
PERRY DAVIS A SON, Proprietors,
Providence, R. I.
BespectfuUy.
T8JH0IH iHi
C a v T rr i i 'j !
oqvcr rA a via wr, m potjfi
ROGEBPTJG
IB3SLUIVlivVA
.iTtT) mnM then half a aaiituM has
J? T In reemte as a medlelnaf agent ln a wide
range of Chronto diseases. Multitudes of women
cnniesufi toUa oniturpAJsed efneacy ln the mief
mnd emrelt tboae sUaisnU peeoUac to their sex.
uart: mxktzT$&Btim
In its varied and most '
. .CHBONIC, BBOHCHITIS, 8CB0rDLA,
t 9leMmoatya,amd
t? Bottled, to ita ,ritarat' I
Snrlnaa. which are beautll
i direct from the
in HOCK
brtdge-ooontjti ;Vsrand atsj
lor tne
oi nsoars rrom une, ,
ober 1st,'
,'Tear: BaDaoUTi 1.000 1
t For swoleeale arid"
ADEN and Dr. T. C. 8M1T,
by Dr. I.E. He-
npnzsx win be a
-JLiAsaouuaUon. at
Meting, of the Carolina Fair
oe vg t uouse jn unarione,
ILLR.
on Baturday, Decek
?b,ia
H VeiOaaV.
fori themrpoSe ref slnr the pror.rttJo
holding an Indnstrlal hxrorftty
1Q L)0IU1UU ueu
Vaib au uw ald members apd citizens generally
arexpeeted an leqneited apend-?
tii-ji tum-i t i.ft;iiir.8x AiJtXANmt tin
OBAftyBJ0H;f.v4 iS,i-H 4 fjn1!.
decla tdmdw !-ati; -i.s J .
IT ... I..A ...J.L.
i i inn iJTnniTriT
n mm ii ; j ura i i hi tviuw
mm
&TCK8
DiphlbA
2?.K3L! T"111 r3r ln acn cases as
DAVIS' r AX fUOiJUl. The
'pttJpt iBWor this imalultbU rimtp has
layed thousands ot Urea. T
I KlLLl
I Delays
r kaU I ravin mTTTTin-Tit irrrnn TTTlTiTJ
f
VA.,
rrowrlstedV
1
ttatresaln
Iii J Dnita rl IriAAinTiATi
ISUPREME COURT DECISION
Fall Term, 1882.
-SR'i'
BeporUd by Walton iL Busbee.
This was an indictment for rernoying;
a crop ofE the leased premises anaiqjp
posioR of it without the landlord's bpnr
sent, he haying a lien upon it and with
out notice to him. After a rerdifet of
iitVitMealtrefdrlflant m6ved
in arrest of judgment on the groupds:
1 Tht inasmuch as A was not the
owner of the land, the bill improper
tharorfd that the lien was not on huk
hnt. t hat it. dhrmiri hare chanced ittrat -
in fee. 2. That the indictment did nfltj
sufficiently charge a lease for a jyear
between A and the defendant, fof the
omission of the word year afterlife.,
word one was a fatal defect. 3. jTbak
the bill was defective in not alleging,
that the defendant failed to givt five,
dfcys notice ermus miwueu rw
nerei- arrested without some su
tice flChis intended rermotai or
K i
enti i:
never arrested without some substp
tial defect, appearing upon the f ac oj
the indictment. There is nothing ii
the bill to show that anyone by the
name of GTwaa the owner in fee or had
any interest in the land. - It is stated
with sufficient certainty that A was the
landlord and that the lien given by the
ddMSlilyQHord year
uufB uub Tiuaie tuo inuiULUieuij ii is
one of the informalities cured by the,
act of 1811. . ! ?;
III. Where it is charged that the.de
pendant :xm9ve4)to.,jei"wit&out
first bavinff, ciyeji ,the saiif A or any
.K07rjlgflt of hisT notice of sucC intended
icuiuvoi, lit lis Buuiuieui. me uTBiiueut
negatives the five days notice required,.
af (
lpwed the
flYIW ff?asf)Ptnft si
Strrned.
rotate -i-sTmiehi
58;; State
vs Lune, 4 Ind 113.
X&agvsqbdfin Buncombe.
lefeoda watindicted, tried and
lHcftje a pistol in Trio-
riroq(tne act Pf 1879 Ch 127. tjounsei
rjequested.his Honor jfo charge the jury 4
QraS "u.tbey believjfd the defendant
6arri0drei ftistoKfiftiy for the purpose
oflbrwMpond that he carried
it openfr andgt concealed on his per.
son forTBlTpurpose of hunting merely".,
he could not be convicted. Instructions
w;efeLrJe'eajfe flfidYth&'j ph-arg given
atft-rnattrt'irdt wfa dffendanr
carried the pistol for, whether to hunt
or for other purposes, yet if he carried
it off his own premises", concealed about
his perapnhf gifl .guilty." The facts of
the case were not set forth in the state
ment sent up.
Held. There was no error in the re-.
asked.
tbe law
charge,
yet so far as it applied to the supposed
facts 01 the case it was not erroneous.
Affirmed.
McKee vs Wilson Gaston.
The complaint consists of a series of
counts separately stated and nj putts.,
to the defendant the utterance of . slan
derous words, both written and spoken,
concerning the'plaintiff. He Wassiier-.
iff and tax collector of the county- of
Gaston from 3lst July to September 2,
1872, and is charged , yith -dishbriesty
and fraudfiaihifliBettlementJ. Witq ' 4h?;
rperbdi6rijbracer dt the taxes col
lected. withholalflg a part nfefeo;f and
corruptly appropriating the saipe'tO his"
own use. The defendant put in fhis an
swer to the causas of action cobtatning
ctfaf gesf fIBiUAii publication and de
murred to the other causes of action
imputing verbal slander, on the
gfro'utid$r t: Thaf the wortfs do not im
"t(U kn infambirs crime. 1:s.'That it is;
Iuo.t.averred that ttie ofds -were spo
iuo uiaiubiu nulla m biio tAci
' i . r v r mi rse , ' i i
cise oi nis omue. a. auh uiieuso cuargfu
is barrdl)y . ib,eJi staute pf limitations
and no prosecution ' will' Tie' therefor.
4- 'There, is no allegation of special
jtlaraag4s - c." .,
Demurrer overruled, defendant ap--peals.
) -- ki
The court says: Words spokejdj! 6fr';a
person in respect to his office, or em-'
ploy ment are actionable only by reason
thereof, must be spoken while he is
holding such office or pursuing
efflplqjniBnt.'and not. afterwards.
m conjluteioral slafnder the words
trniat Jnipu-ttek.W tbfeiplaSritiffi the' com
mSaaiAn rP on i n -fa rnAna A-fPanoa t' "TP1 a"1
act of 1871-'2 makes the failure roc-1
count for and pay over the public taffeW
a misdemeanor, and such a,cnarge as
iIaaiiI w- -v 4" nkf inn o VT rk t : . 'Ti
'TherBrrng-rieatert5aebt of spWV
damages, the case is not relieved frocd
tbe general rule applicable to slanders;
actionable per se.
rror- Jadgment reversed;
Anderson, Starr &Co, vs Hall,Execu?
tog Buncombe. I
rf n1 ttrtacasttthtt-flimmons issued on
iiov S9,i376 and was returned, eidorse?
TACT 1 I An.o MCA.wSnA a Atnrvtn1 41 in 04
December. 1875. C A Hall, per M E
daftef-.atty.'CJom plaint was filed at
Spring term, 1876 and also what pur-
lortedtoije an answer-! i
UberAxioeketAtiiminlrln, 1882 and
I i ili. 1! fm
a rule was oDtaineu upon ino piadaiSn
to show cause why the acceptaooertOX
Bei'vicei fri derehuSnts name should n.otr
be stricken out as unauth6rized..ndj
the answer made for her be fwithdraWft
tonl tne"flfe ot he'tjbttttf; ami, ,9Wk
tnbved to quasa the SuthniinsAna,aiS
miss the action. In suDDtrt'-of" the
rule defendants affidavit wak offsrpd: in I
I V. . . . . ' mm mmr A. 1- i 1 t i 1 J. il Kl
-Jb hicn) jfia)Q ffts i arm anas wpiiaawsMu
etVrrdMrt Calterils her attorney in
the general management or. tne scsbs
naa never
' ance for
ol ffwCfii Mr Carter bad ceased to be.J
Wlsi rrrrsA at lyxkW
atifleip' A
fusa.Ljto,give the instractions
WhHibii Honor iaiddbwh'i
somewhat too broadly in nls
cess in her name, or tomtef 'aiuumar- rfiave
nor witnout tne-acxnaAaervice i.in
hATattdrnev ln I8TF bf afeorf M Wl'sal sho
engagements, &c. The J
Jge-oriteriC
the entrv of "service ac&
)tea-tOie.
erased, and granted leave to wttfidrAyt'
.ttAApawer medAttithe apbearane
tared fof her. TramtifJ eiceftsftSSSE
nnailM I M
The court says ; An attqrntf cwrorfulT
cess by which the action isjbcgtiap.Th&ltrnrfee or morga
principles upon which the auLuuiiu.es
rest is that is no part of the dtrgf pJW
IDA SCOUtjhieEjBlS
f service for-his q
process Dy 'wntcrr'
the lurlsdicrion or tne cqurs over tn
- . .... " 1 .i-iL-
person of tbe client is nrst escaoiisnedt
uidcinntlk thut be done th reJationi.of
client and attorney cannot begin, nor-
r-.in it be created by the act of fjiff
navrauane jr dai r i . ! ' n--4
TJo error! Affirmed. IaitaAjctiw8v4
ma- RaorleT vs Barkland. 1 Exch.. W H
.. n. Muntalvnn Ira T .Cxt. aira Jt'SfiVi'rt
IGSW WeK8,09iAW9Pec f v uu as.
I rax I - rem
FabejfiasK tfargedWit)i wtrryiflg.
V A A AVAi I V e
rMe44a?tfrS finding thfedev
ftfrr niSTwemises anatnar
he did not belong to any ot the.ecetfttfl
l .!.!. fhav aaitr tllbt TBlTmrV
1 Kff wt Tittrf ore finding the in-
dictmenx against mm ijio upiciiu.
while in the streets of Jhevinchaa;
MUaiiiaiieispnjoi.jwpicnaf in;
- - . t ' . m
.hia rvvorrtnatnacKeL.anu aonueuuuuui
TVVv7QT;iP,,if n o criminal intentirf
carrying the pistol icon to4ldrhls
7poxiet,l)utbrftqghfe,he iaaw aaa iam
ie;aii)eics;i mpwypv u?fi
AahevUle, and jyfl
store where purchased to another some:
three hnaredfya;ras'diStkht,for the bur
Dose-taving 'ifetpftetoB-Uht ofherJ
gddds bought at that iHace ? nd tljere
fore they submitted the q'tiissttotiW bia
fuilt .or, innocencej xy the court. J His
onor was of opinion against deffenii
ant. and1 gave judgment acdordiagly- Ji
rrr a of a. TOcraTTi
.IrfdLi;6ffrittaet6 ft sprf lt-to bld,ttife
The offense cnargeu iwuu uo occcpuon
to the general rule, that to constitute'
a'6rfmrtiiere antst'b aBmiBaiiUnfe
To onbeal-ai weapon means soiae-
,;thinfc morthaii rPra? avjng
bik-mhetm it 4nay,itt4pejjBntrjbi
,Mtt"s8enf ot traiand uif gdi3& intention
Wheieal epressiyfKfeitfiat
therflVarJbftSriinmi intention dotf
nected with theraet, that must puttaa
. TJDoh the"lerms Of the'Spe6Ial .eidict
tlwdefendantw .eotUIed.$6ri dla
qba.rgeiai.atidit'is aprdered ? , -i.i3-Error.
' : i lx-'-
JS I'1- r.,
et aist-ancambe' u
t if i J fiJc
i
entiorfiri tl
ma 7
ord ot
he arraignmei
tflf meaftefoi
ts-nor.
of their putting in any picas
;the'
chargVTrrtfeTre:ra-the indict!
the defendants asks it, the court directs
the. jSmgof-a certiorari, to the end
that rMcr eA'rxetfdtSnay-be made as
arencess'aT7tryiAaky the record truth
ful. ; mi " -
audger.ra V! C;lilrab(mpany--"
--l " v - MadfseW T
Smith, C.J. :
This action is one of tort, and its ob
ject the recovery of damages sustained
by the plaintiff resulting from the neg
ligence of detehdantcompany.- :
The record states that at fall term,
1882, '.Messrs Biiford, Logan and: Clyde
are made, parties defendant,' and tiled;
their answer, but at whole' fnstarice.un-
ie8s their own, does not appear. 'The
tnree added defendants, citizens-01
other States than that of the plaintiff,
filed their petition for the remqval of .
thegcausetothe CircjijCourt jof the
T?hUeatatpRiinrfef IhA tfifirnffrfi9.
Tri" progress of the xvise is arrested
by law at the point when the Temoval
was demanded.
The court says:' If the individual
non-resident defendants come into,
courty and .assume a common responsi
bility with the other defendant, while
no .recovery is asked against Ubem, it
cannot be said that there has beeA con
stituted in the words of the statute, "a
controversy whieh Is wholly between .
pUizfcfis. of ?aiffei4nfc! Stales, arid; which
can b& f ally dejnnijiedf as ibefrween
theihT' To en ahlera" party to a removal
there must exist in the suit a separate
aud dist!ficaiaTofcaoiiion, in irespect,
10 which an ine necessary parties, on,
one side are citizens of different States
from th(we on" the other. The applica
tion-', for renrdval wss properly denied.
rjarney-vs-ijainam, 103 u,!5, ;2Ui5;
Blake vs McKine, lb, 336; Hyde vs
Ruble, 1048,-407.
Horah 'atid wlf6 vs Knox et als Meck
. ,. lenburg.. 'I .
Smith, C. J.: :
The script . was executed in March,
1877, the formal execution of - the
inUuirierit. ..proven by the sub
8 c r i b i n g , w i-1 n e s s , W a S not
controverted, but ita legal . efficacy
was impeached on the grounds of a
wantof mental, capacity torrxake it, and
the exercise of undue inSuehce by the
6olbeneficiarjr under it.
The court in; disposing 6t thenu:
meroos excei)ljous taken- - bV the cavea-
HyirjaaTwy'whepo'ia juajauseptton
to the evidence or a witness1 wo was
permitted to testify from his own
knowledge and observation and express
the opinitm that - the deceased did not .
possess sufficient; capacity to make any
effectual- disposition of her property,
including as well a disposition by will
as by gift inter vivos, thus affording the
jury the " results of the witness' obser
vation and his own general estimate of
the mental '-infirmittesrjf deceased
without invadibe.the nrovrnce: of the
jury in determining the issue itself, the.
excemHm wn l hod Da austalnea. ......
Tiife S0CCd!H$xcptiptt 4s ntenabje, J
me rignb is, expressly given ujy siatuie
'to 'kXofiii jfs to argue to thef jufryi the
whble case as well ' by law as bylf act
fevu5adesec ,57jih.31) and B&ore ts-
-peuially under, the enlarged iprMrilege
eonMat8W4h. 114. as in
J3. Ex!aSi4. 5 -relate .toitom ments of
JWvM&t'v counsyipon other;natr. J
tersiwuiine'.nreiiaoieness ex
tFtestirlri1&. f A' Jarr-: cannot
towePliTspecUlateupon' his chanr
cesXoJ a'vjjrdi.et and then; complain be
cat9?u5tAr4rested in their
cdmmenls-iipon the cgae." Morgan vs.
Smltrf.TT 87Hamsrii : vs; Chappie, 84-
ipS; Knight vfl.;HcnghtalIing,851Te,-5 n
-ovAv r ormai .exeenwon ana a Knowi
cjDf Ihejeoiitwist-of he writing be
ing shown, the caveators, impeaching
tts: validity must afltemativelj show the.
wanx aoiioajfticity or tne exercise 01 a
raudulent innuence which a aennea
right tBbrs5pnes, 4i2. na
DIANAS yj:TPatterson et. f aL-rEIclf-,
iBejsinoFin
u i i ;
rec
l
cfSa
rtfent
riniw
Case itorjdPsMTAr;0.-,JfoxiJflc.H'A "' '
fjfl" October 30, 1874, piamtm execn-
4-leds BdtfiOlfiisirdriV secured by
iim&ogige on a cfijtaj.t tracts ot land,'
deixnditionaxtaJitt.vwa 11 note , was
,paMiatu3La(rdJhg tp its' tenor.,!
riBefaaflt intbe"anMnthpasl made, and I
af tejrj KvertiseaMir I actqmgT0
Abe terms. oJ-iLiJ-ti.iiUUtmage ,tnajana
was sow to-onaiflfrfot- tne amouni o:
f
,TseT3jajd ebtt,iwactfcCas aged
"-' - m a c L ;j t hiih w nAUL. J -a. at rAAU
VOfem. ; -T-BJdtfcwaaenUd to by the
irftnderm asreement between
aWaiif tttfiieH thdt he shon!
JtwelviinioW9i thfcraaftefn,,
U3Q trpav,weanBaimaireueem tne.
bdi
rtnk.rifr.VirTM&'falTftte ts do so the
hould stana,anaesiaie or aetenu
ant-S. iDWOITW aWWO- aUBUIUl, 1U
ed and? trader a
uttrfittrtarv nrnfieloj
KtMlairMffjwafraMrieUd. Irr-Itfdtiourt
-t-- Vrifl tffiftnt "sW ehdered ' dismiss
-at i33ia,i niainwii. wuo
O. iDZEJJIfU -m J.i.-
ig liejIP3101 cf oi I
TfiWiJ!xWlttP ddes not bring-f
rule, that
eAcungJi
:raer tne
rp
e vesfcettt
trfef;aee(l.,6atr-.
not become a ,imijwaroi:at
sown sure
jieALner aiieou-i&a&iaro
ghtfWt
a suggestion
wvrin ct iSTiev SVBMffS
r,tfiat thfcsjleim$e
arid fair, or
iidujxJLesaitea
the;pJaintiJtf
rdm the mannef ,ii whic
jtrafcoi
eailvredwj
r-t ; that the dndaatftimigh
??l 11 tifeteifervtsve thei:
bid and bfi
debt This
tbLpjayafteiL t,jnagr
.cowt l ielowja-rmai. xta xU m
TBaasonj:
2.j4r,4q285i
is,
9lN,.CL.;426,:
u ft R1R of.
gJ87 JM.U, 210;
244: Blount . V8,
TKla-fa hWfl!hrI f bs th& rrecoverv-of
' jd Detorn yorJtwta paro.es Qiaica.
nndetrMeyj-.:ryjeM
. i naerra.nvejanpe xivm uqc boii
Frrlade aTnmleSeattf andi the v4ef end?
-nj.fi t BftViftBi mesne conVevances-i from
omaneconyeyea
no ii
ft'MtmDV
i
ecknowletog jeceipt Jf the sunvot thewt UOtXiOT
$200aU! consider atiorl. icon tains the phatecomr.tieatoo, tC,,8eeadv. I,; " ?T"yiT.r,r:v .j fc'scnsCI - - "
.ViZ?-.rM l"m trn&'i:r rUvf.'l:"f?? t-nn sr-ttclT JHf , - ,
iifoliowing: lLmi;tatior; , "The aforesaid
plana witu all iu : waters, woods, &a, to
jvo:anr3o Roia, ana JLUie ssaaancy
warrant aad Xorewri defend the1 right
and titla of . the above : bounded land
against all and.very r4thex perabn or
daim;oo the said Philip Hendrick; bis
heirs and. assigns for ever, etc." Plaihtr
iflSi insist that the effect of the deed was
tcfcpass Qnjy-a ljfe... eatate;to Hendricks,
una us ne is now aeaa, tney are' entitled
to, posBessioq of the land. Defendant
insists that it- passed a fee fiimple, but
that if it did; not itwas so intended and
ao. understood by the parties, and if
there is any failure in it, it is owintr to
junistake in the-draoicrbtsman. Th in.
.parcnas , ari estate id. xee ny tne deed.
Upon ; the iverdict judgment was ren-.
Jeredifp? defendant; plajjatiff,4ppeared
BenaingtPi the jury. rnaKes it un
neceesarv; to consider the Question &m
ttt the operatiOA of the deed. Under it
defendants, are ; entitled to the judg-
menc oi the. courts ..
;jWhen jqtfexwnjh 'is offered for the
pnrjwse-of contradicting
S deed by
sideration
pam was lsa than the one vested upon
ltd face., then. . in the absence of anv J
juggesiwuj o iWaua. or; imposition the '
testimony:, wouie: ,be t clearly incompe
tent. J opes vs , Saner, 1 D & B, 452;
Powell vs- Manufacturing Co. 3 Mason.
347 j Shejly, ;vs Wright, WiUis' Rep, 9 ;
juewis vs vox, 4 JLredell J5q, 193, cited.
No error. : Judgment affirmed.
Mallen,-Executor, vs. Sarah Helder-
manLiincoln.
SivrrTH, C. J.b '
This was an issue of devisavit vel
nort," tried at Fall term; 1881. Upon the
propounding the script purporting to
be the will of Valentine Helderman bv
Mullen, the executor, Sarah Helderman
tne associate executrix and the surviv
ing wife of deceased renounced her
said office and caused her dissent to the
alleged will to be entered of record.
Thereupon the heirs at law and next1 of
km appeared and filed their caveat
thereto; tbe probate was resisted upon
the grourjd of undue influence exerted
over the mittd and volition of deceased
by his wife in procuring the making of
tne instrument in the sole interest ot
herself and her own children, to the
exclusion of the children by a former -
marriage, and in the impairment of
that freedom essential to the validity
of a dispositive testamentary act. Ver
dict for caveators ; appeal.
The force and efftcts of th acts, evi
dence of which tended to show the per
gonal relations and intercourse be
tween deceased and his wife and the
wife's harsh treatment of the children
bv the former marriage, belonir exclu
sively to the jury and an exception to
me admission e.r such evidence win not
be sustained.- Evidence was not inad-
rxtiBsable in answer to the reason' given
for the exclusion of one class of the
testator's children, to show that no
foftindation for such exclusion existed,
and that tbe natural parental sentiment
had been perverted. But if it were
irrelevant unless its admission tended
to mislead or may have mislead the
jury, this would not constitute an error
fatal to tbe verdict.
The proof of the improper liberties
and indecent behavior of Ballard at the
bedside of tbe wife and the anguish it
seemed to have wrung from an en
feebled and helpless, old man, was
forcible and direct upon tbe over-mastered
and unresisting temper of the
deceased, and the objection to it is
Wholly untenable.
The introduction or the declaration
of the wife after the making of the will
and on the day prior to death of de
ceased may be defended nbon -the
ground of. showing a continued exercise
of influence after the. execution of the
instrument and before its consumma
tion by death. . No error. Affirmed.
Loves, Executors, vs. Harbin, et als.
Haywood.
RrjFriN, J.:
Action fOT the recovery of land. The
only issue submitted was : "Did plain
tiff's testator execute, the deed alleged
ihi defendant's answer." The original
deed had been lost, a certified copy was
onereu in evidence and the case closed
for defendants. Plaintiffs ; objected.
1st. Because it appeared from the paper
itself that it was no deed as there was
no consideration expressed in it. 2.
probate was not such as to justify the
registration of tbe original deed as there
was no subscribing witness to the in
strument and it was- admitted to pro-
hate hpon proof merely of the hand
writing of the maker. 3. .Because the
probate, even if sufficient to; authorize
the original to be . registered was pot
sufficient to authorize tbe introduction
of tbe copy as evidence, but that it was
incumbent on defendants since the
execution f the deed was :denied,to.
pTove it as at ommon:. law,! notwith
standing it had been registered. Ob-
ieetiott averraLed. After verdict' and
judgment for defendants plaintiffs ap
pealed. -
ttem. -ah aeeus are put upon tne
footing of feoffments, which take effect
by livery 'Of seizure and need no con
sideration J as" between the parties to
support them.;; (The seal itsfelf import
ed a -consideration. ' aaeea to, wnicn
there is no subscribing withes May be
admitted -to probate and registration
bv Drobf of ' the maker's, hand writing
0nly; and this without reference to the
fact whether be be living or dead.
' The Btatute nowhere mslkes it .the
duty of the- officer: wka, admits a deed
to probatei to make and record a formal
aq judication 1 of i it. probate. JSor is
thm-R ativ TrrovJsion . wJaich rJeauires the
Tlegwter to sbreadupan hiaj books tbe
WEblUUaiQt' UL ' DUU1 1 oujuuibauiuu. jlu
would-shaMe - too majny titles to allow
stichfc an' lobjecttori: topEerailat. this
main 'purpose .untenaea, to pe ac-
lstrauon is tne per-
etuation or the instrument ana or, me
nVnffcrKu'oT-ltjP1 probateT- irid Of deir of
iestratrOil'aii it will ndt do to hold
Lthat thft intention of, the statute rnay
Ljpa defeat Jby an' order to Produce the
A ?tey 'ys ttranperry, 00 i, zoo.
Morel v vs "Morelv, (this termVaC P,
iSecsi.iiiacK.vs jusuce, ?itjj 004;
V?arriexf,,v.s naujpvou.r -1 uL-tjuoi, oui ,
Starke Vs Etheridge; 71 N C,J 240,, 'Cited
and apptpypd. N6 iTor. Affirmed,' ' 3
"rlogefHTEeMfoV, vs. Gooqhi iAdinkiis-
; i i i - .x. . trator-iianiax.
iteMl Whtre thRtitfe td a bond sued
on" w WtrUi he plaintiff, nor is the
interest,;-the action: J hiastl fail 'The
I piainUff titgh . have-avmded; useless;
stUrTioS6.Jahd Inat vet do so by mak-
LLing Je defjLfltehtfiaijartyjto the actioxr
pow penamg oetween me auuiimBtin
t6f il WnfynJ and bfrnself, so that all
the parties being before the court, tne
interest; sMrpfc Johnsqu us- a legatee
and her liabiiitv UDon the bond may be
properJy4adjPted-;a
i charged, the pneyby the other. . , , ,
il 1 cjLfr9ulax Msm'e Experience;
fha lata m In ft (Vll . Jnhnr fl WWtnftf K WTMk
UmUi ight'sUlaease ef the kidneys, tat Warner's
sate Juone ana uvsr uare gaimo me dscjc tn mm
when all th physicians had gl&i4ilaii up. He
. . . . . . a I ai 1 1 .w
AlKiuia, jaianu ia au4uwu.au uramo
UA 1 i -
Bto toSd ALini usb lunn bpsuss Wamb ahd
ILiaiThe-great Jttmle ends alterattve contains
twloa as wiheh htm and fiftv net- cent, more alum-
tnmn than any "slum and Iron" mass'.V.kBewiu,
just me (fimg ror.ine , -spnng jwewums?-; uvw mx
Bold bv-au anutEuts or majssaoaiDg,
redntjedojia hsjr,rf'49
rvsiaeaiui
general. -bom By au oruggms or any mwmiTig. j riff i t; .71 ,;; j;, ,.vk-TTIT; "X" TO , - .
iwoes reduced one half.-mT MJiAi) 13 1L.-77 r.l.,Tj.rrV1 . A AT FT3 U V A "Va. -
3,000 YARDS CASHMERE, at 12i PER YARD,
100: WALKING. J A(jKETS, - $3.00 TO $15;00.
ldo GtOAKS; - - - - - - $10 TO $20.00.
50 ULSTERS, - - - - - - $5eQ0.Tp $15.00.
. and an Far-Uned Circulars, $15.00 to
CLOTH CIRCULARS, - - - $7.00 TO $10.00.
Handsome Dress Patterns, $10.00 to $
Dress Flannels, 25c,
CasMm Back and Colors,
' ty Terra Cotta Mosqultlre Kids and the i newNeok, the Mrs. LaagtryTle. Plushes aU colors aid
gnaiaies. 8ome handsome Plashes forJicieta and Circulars. Oir stock embracas ererytlitni new
and a call will onvlaca yoa that we hive a stock that cannot be exoellel for styles and low prices.
EXdec3
WE WMM ALL, DPI ITT
COMEiDOWN IN PRICES.
AgSPECUL REDUCTION FOR TBE HOLIDAYS.
THS Largest. Finest and Best Made cp CZiOTSIIffGr srd best styles te sele
Irom, of any Betall Stock ln tbe Mate, fceuutauon havlcs been kcqrdred by lis far- selllDg Out
class CLOTHING only, at POIULAB LOW I RICES, we dtstlntUy with It vedercterd that e wUl no
be undersold by any tloihlDg Bonee, either lie or sirslL CurKcveltles for the HOLIDAYS are 1m
men Be. such as Fine SCABFt, fcILK and LINEN BOBDEBXD HiNI KBBCEUF8, and all In the line
of GENTS' 1CBNISH1KGS. AN lMJLENbB STOCK OF OVI&COaTS at BDUCXD PMICXS.
4-3
i 03
pa
OC2
Etr- AKmia ior the JfKAUb bEluT. We lnrite
declO '
73
CD
o
05
CD
Kl
O
CD
tr
O feJ
o
c
d,
tf;.
o
o
w
m
H
W o
o
W.'.
o.
a
GO
CO
o
CO
ex
m
o
0x3
CD
: ;:I;;NOW
The LARGEST and
EVER
"JTA"
. UIIU IUUI
sui riff
t..;i ..pj ' ' . ; , , , , .
'-15 -' -R- . . j
I - ' -r''-' ' , , xL 3c ;S i y.
jisw-k-i ,n ,;i jg ,rr tM -eS mtistt r - 'f
;',:-..i,.f3z;i 3-; 65 '' 'J" . .e rsiO,.
;tia - .i t-- h :"- - ia-; , . 2 - , t T3f c?"TV
H.- W 11 .11 :.'Srr:. .irLr
, ,3-,, 11
tfl i CO - S sjjari ? hmm ' 'i 1 . aat
mOjJGHIjQTITOiMAItKET
rfij r
i
33ic, 75c, $1, $1.25.
i..Vf
finite 65c, 75c, $1, $L25, $L50
argraves iliek
Smith Building. East Trada Street.
XJ
2
3
the Public Respectfully,
Leading Clothiers and Tailors
Ox
o
OQ
SS2i
Ox
O
o
o
S3
WW
H
n
'1
O.
OO
Si
MP
Prettiest, Stock of
ll.illlM a a .i,...
O aV
8CT 55
CBOB, a.
it'll
' If H
. i !l
' : P 1
' -' S3