Newspapers / The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, … / Nov. 16, 1908, edition 1 / Page 8
Part of The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
CHARLOTTE DAILY OBSERVER, NOVEMBER 1C, 1CC3. 1 "S -.1--- 111 . Make Fkmm) ' . tin 7TT '.,': TO-DAY, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16TH, 75 CHOICE LOTS 75 Near the centre of the Town of Pittsboro, N. 0. Meet us on the grounds. Nov. 16th Bring Your Friends. Nov. 16th TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17TH, 85 '."V CHOICE LOTS 85 Near the heart of the Town of LATTA, S. C. Nov. 17th Grand Opportunity For You Nov. 17th 100 100 HIGH-CLASS RESIDENCE AND BUSINESS LOTS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18TH, In the heart of the Town of DILLON, S. C. JThis is a golden opportunity, a chance of a life time for the business man or Speculator to make a safe and sound investment Nov. 18th Nov. 18th 15 CHOICE TRUCK FARMS - N ! " 15 l One mile from, the growing ; Town of Raeford. , This is the best farm land to oe Md at any price, and we are going to sell , it at your ; - 1 OWN. PRICE. ' v MEET US THERE FRIDAY Nov. 20th NoVfcOth' 75 75 BEAUTIFUL HOME SITES In the resident section of -; v ;Roib;N-;agf 4''v A town that is growing every day. ' Nov. 21st Jy-, ,:Nov;21st 80 80 f CHOICE RESIDENT LOTS ZBULON, N. CL .f WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 23D( Each fronting a nice broad street or avenue in . Zebulon, N. C. One of the best towns in eastern North Carolina. Crood schools. Surrounded by a goocl country. A good plate to make money, if you will invest just a little at the sale. ,1 -v , 75 ' man-CLA3 REsromrT lots, v 75 Tuesday, Nov, 21th ' , Tuccday, Nov. 2ith v WILSON, IT. 0. ' 1 . " 75 high-class resident' lots right up in Wilson, N. 0. A clean, up-to-date town tt"t every one knows is" growing fast. These lots ai M high and dry, each fronting a nice, broad street or v avenue' and stir-' 1 rounded by; good people owning thei own homes. 'Come to this one sure and .bring your friends. r , -65 65 - CHOICE LOTS WEDNESDAY, 1TOVEMBER 25TH,' S2HTHFIELD,lI.O. 65 choice lots in Smithfield, N. C, 'county seat of -Johnston county. , A grand ' opportunity for .. you Meet ns at Smithfield also. ' -v 7 ' v " ' v ft k FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27TH, - . , WENDELL, N. C . ' 68 safe' investments at Wendell, N: 0. Something that won't burn up or blow away;' no more being manufactured; bound to increase in value. Jv K T'C5 liMO: Ft?lkMn&- IT'S LAMB There will be a choice lot given away at each of the above' sales. Music furnished by an elegant band and your price will be ours. , ' ' ." . PENNY BROS., OUR TWIN AUCTIONEERS, TURN YOUR REAL ESTATE INTQ MONEY. COME OUT AITD CEE OUR WETHO.: v 5 AMI ERIC AN REALTY & AUCTION 'CQFJIPANV, GEO. T. PENNY, Pres. J .C. PENNY, C. E. THOMAS, Vice Pes. i 1 -H r Don't Fail to See Penny Bros, and Thomas Bros., the Four Twins That Manage Out Auctioneering Department. J, R. Thomas. Sec and Treas. f. - i - " i f 111 . ' ; ' - -. - ; - ' ..-. - j f ' . - , t i , . v t , II 6UPBEMB COUBT OPINIONS Mrr Ann Rue v. W. A. Oonnell, t Wills, Interpretation ot, Ademption. In- tent. , la order to estatiuan an aaempuon Mcine devise, there niuat be an altera' tion in the character of thi the eublect mat ter mad or authorised by the . i -4 kimmAi. Thnrarnn. when lim uiiui - there is a devise ot certain lands by tbelr known name, concerning; hii - th.r. was a claim ander a .tnnirsni (a ranvtr made by some third neraon. hib. in the lHe tune of the testator, had been unsuccessfully eoif tested by suit, and after his death It bad . .11 i.un imntMtNl anil th. run- chase price paid to the executor and reia ty mem xree min uiwm w. wi, v. the testator, and It further appearing that the testator died In possession txlievlns; he was the owner In fee, his in lentlon wilt be construed as devising, not only the land Itself, but all ot bis right, title or Interest therein; and by the spe elA devise the proceeds of sale of the land wll ge to the devisee named. B. R. Gay vs. Roanoke Railroad and Lumber Co. ft al. J. Trespass, Question ot Ownership, Evi dence, la aa action for damages ageing upon the alleged negligence of defendant, thmn.h which the Umber, etc. upon plain OS's lands consisting of several tracts, was burned, it was admitted In open court that the plaintiff was ths owner and la possess ton or ue tana upon which the trespass waa alleged to have faMs oammitted. Held: It was competent. tipoa cross examination, for defendant's cvunsai to asa me puuoun, wmnu ib his n behalf. If a certain tract of the land waa net owned by some on else at the time of the fire, as tending to show that he had sold It, and thereby Impeach Ma estimate of the damage ne naa tesu- titA to on his direct examination. t Contracts, Interpretation at, ladepen - dent Contractor. Evidence, IV hen a party defendant aptly sets up the defense ot Independent contractor In relation to his co-defendant, and the only rr) denes thereof is a written contract to that effect, tree frcm ambegulty. the In terpretation of the contract Involves Question of law alone; and It is error for the trial judge to charge the jury that the paper writing does not establish the relation of independent contractor, but they can consider H in finding whether such relationship exists. V Sam. 'vTben. under a lawful and clearly ex Irs4 contract, one party employs an other to do a certain work for him with out any supervision or control, and the party (or whom the work is don Is in terested only In it ultimate result, the latter is not liable to third persons In dantre far the negligent of the former, provided he has not been negligent la se ! tins' faim as a suitable person for the purpose. . - - . fft T, Tobo WUkes. '" vf Vllful" Abandonment of Oops, Revissi JurisdictJon, Judgment, Arrested, a court of 1 tut ice of th peace has final jurisdiction of n wilfnl abandonment f crop in violation at Revisal, section 136. A Judgment of the guporlor Conrt. to Ttliich the Indictment was originally j tvM'cht, will t arrested. 'v '' In.lictment neard before . W. R. Allen, J., term time, of Greene.., . t r n. Glascock, and Wlfa X. Ni fcray, , f j , ' ' ' - ' 3 vf-'itors and AdmlHstrator, ' Tor i cutr?r. Bond. Deda nrid Coa- ; t-;tutory Rettuirecneala, ta-J r i-vi-il, witon ft. declaring. i ' i;o f irn'Ti .executor hss any au t ( r v ti rif-rrwdfile wtih the. estatx , e Kifli l:ve entered into', bond' , i a veir from the testator's death. . ... ;M ft.j iv fitr.!rn exoculors to lanls i ;-! ite. unii'r a power in -wiu fj t.o t; i i .1 the statutory I'.iea wits, v "h the i , In re i expc- any control over any part of the estate. real or personal, until th terms of the act ar compiled with. A. ft WsJksr vs. Hennr C. Venters. . L Contract in Writing, Mortgagor and Mortgages. Parol Evidence, Contrao- tlon. When the vendee of lands has mort gaged them back to th vendor to secure the purcnase price in a sum nameo, ana It is expressly stated In th mortgage that a certain number of bales of cotton, weighing (16 pounds each, should be paid In lieu of said sum, at certain times ex tending over a neriod of ten years, th note secured by the mortgage specifying that payment has to b maa in cotton accordingly,-' svJUenc I Incompetent ot a parol agreeqent mad at th time of me execution oi uie nwnawao. uiu w event of payment In full at any on time, or of foreclosure, the specified amount was to be paid In money at plaintiffs' op tion, ss such would be a contradiction by parol evidence- of th terms ot a writ ten Instrument, i. Contracts. Crop Payments, Mortgagor ana aunguge. nmuiv vs awmmbbo, Interest. When under the express term of a wrltran enntraot. the nurchas Dlic nam ed In a osrtala sum of money for certain lands, was to have been paid in cotton in certain amount and at various times. In lieu of an amount soeculed in tne rnort gsga, upon default the amount due on the mortgage I th value of th cotton at the market price when each instal ment fell dee. with Interest, subject to payments and set-oas, II any. Action tried before W. R Allan. and raja Jury, Ma term. IK. f Pitt fiainnir appealed. John A. Poythress va. Durham and Southern Railway Company. L Carriers of Goods, Liability, Notie to Consign, Reasons! Tim to Remove, Warehousemen. The liability ot a common carrier con tinue until notice Is given consigns of arrival of shipment ot goods at destina tion .and a reasonable Urn given to re move It. Thereafter the carrier 8 liability is that of a warehouseman. 2. Kama. Requirements ot Notlea. Notice ot the arrival of a shipment of goods, to relieve the carrier of liability as such, need not be served personally cn th onslgne by th carrier. .. The requirement ot Rale 1 of the Corpora tion Commission ts applicable: "Nollot ahall be alvsn fay delivering same In writing. In person, or fay leaving K at sonsignae's plao of business, or by depositing It la th pes tonic.- . - J. p loadings. Demurrer, Cans Defective ly Stated. Amendment. A demurrer will not be sustained t a complaint merely because a cause f ac tion tr -detectlvely stated which may eaxlly be reruedled by amendment it neo-ssary- - - ..' a XX Taylor vifc F. f. Mill and fSofn, L Mortgagor and Mortgage. al of Xortgag Property, Purchaser Burren- der in .Law. Measure of Pamages, Ques : tiona for Jury, t , - ' Defendant represented to plaintiff that he had a mortgage on a oertaln hon plaintiff had bought, wnatwupoa plaintiff replied, that it th horse waa defendant's property he could go and get him. TbH defendant norwards did in plaintiff's ao eae, (Subsequently, plaintiff aseertain ed that defendant's mortgage had not been registered at the tin of bis pur chase, and brought claim and delivery; proceedings. Defendant replevied and then sold the horse. Held; 1. That de fendant's taking the horse erader th clr-j cumsiaBoea we not a surrender in law by the defendant, 2. That Aha question of laches as defendant's registering th mortgage has no application, as be should have retained th possession until th nMMtgsge wss OKistered. t, That th amount of recorery should h ths' value of th hone at tbe time It was wrongfully taken, with Interest there from, and the amount paid by plaintiff waa only to be considered by the jury upon the question of stx-h value. j Action heard before Hlsgs, aM a Jury, . Lecaojier teita, iiMk, Kef liin ovr. ' :- P. B. Cilery et al va Wm. A. OuthHe. U Appeal and Error, Ai;(iun.nt ot J r- ror of Jiecord. Appeal tmm 1 -i.e::t. An sj , j.i ttvin a JuJstuer.i uti cot require a summary of exceptions taken uon the trial Rule 1 (2) before it can b heard on appeal under Revisal n. Otherwise when demurrer Is sustained or overruled, for RevlaaL section 475. provides, that th demurrer shall dis tinctly specify th 'grounds of objection to th complaint, or it will be dls re- sard ed. 1 State's Land, Entry, Bams Lands, Dlspot as to County. Procedure. Whan tha defendant, under Revisal. action 1Mb. is olalmlng to lay an entry ana as us a grant lor lana aamwea to n th earns as contained in plaintiff's grant, th plaintiffs entering their protest that th land lay In a certain county, and the defendant contending that th ' protest should be dismissed tor that it lay In a different county, relief can be had In tht penaing cause, ana it is not necessary i resort to an action of ejectment after, de fendant has nerfeeted his grant. Action heard by Neal. J., May term. uksj, ot nw Hanover.' t Plaintiff appealed. ' Acme Prper Box Factory, t aL vs. .At lantic Coast Un Railroad Company. L Carriers ot Goods, Consignor and Con signee, Contract to . Deliver, Suit by i;onsurnoT. -', A vendor, who is under contract to de liver roods to a vendee. Is entitled to over th identical goods, or If they are lost, their value- and interest, from a com mon carrier in default to whom they had been delivered for shipment, . . i. Same, Evidence, Nonsuit. . V It la error in th trial Judge to render a Judgment of nonsuit. ' upon tb evi dence. In an action brought by a con signor against a common carrier to - re. cover th value of a lest shipment, when ther Is evidence that he waa uader con tract to deliver them to to consignor at destination. In such instances th title and possession of th shipment do not, as a matter ot law. pas to tha consignee by delivery to th common cmer. Action triad before NeaW. and Jury, May term, lMt, of Lenoir. . Melvlll Dorsey vs. Town of Henderson. L Cities and Town. Grading : Streeta, Damage to Abutting Owner, Liability f City.:: -,- - . Revisal section 29tt. provlae that th commissioners shall keep th streets, etc.. at a town ta repair "in, snen manner and to tha extent they deem beat, and cause such hnprovementa In th town to be mad ae may be necessary." Therefore. when th commissioners of a town in th cards of thee powers, cause, in their discretion, ending- ot th street or side walks t be made, whereby the value of plain'lt's property nas- been decreased, th plaintiff cannot recover of th town therefw. in th absence of statutory au thority. If th commissioners haVe acted within their authtrtty and with dua car X. Same, Chang of Plan, Ratification. . wnn xn street commissioners or n town have changed th original plan of Its civil snglneer in regard to grading tha streets and sidewalks,. and damages are Claimed ry a property owner on mat ao count. th' courts are precluded from In quiring lnt- th adviaabiuty of th ehamre. when It appears that the town cmrnissiontirs had adopted and approved Walter H. Briseo va. Henderson Light. tag and Power company. trespassers. Personal Injury; ' Children, Invitation, Kxpraeaeaor tmpuea, fiend Insrs. Demurrer. : t. Owners in nossesslon of Isnds are not tiabl for trespassers tor Injuries received front conditions arising from ths lawful use thereof tor manufacturing or other lawful purposes: and a complaint alleg ing that the electrical plant en defen dant's premises was sllurlng or attrac tive to boys, snd the plaintiff, a boy of U years of age was Injured while going through an opening between two build ings on defendant's lands by fulling Into well o iwk water, necugentiy covered wr, used tn the conduct oi wortant s buiim. nt there is no allegation that boys usually passed the pUce where the Malar! Jlake rie j lond The -Old t'anaari GROVES' TAKTELES3 CHILL TOXIC drives out malaria and bulM up the sys tem. For grown people ar.J thtl- injury was occasioned, or were In the habit of frequenting tb defendant's t remises on account of Its attractiveness. or that invitation, expressed or Implied, had been extended by defendant, the lalntiff was a trespasser and defendant i not responsible tor his act thereof, and a aemurrer will d sustained. Action heard unon demurrer to th com plaint fay Cooke, J.. Mar. term, WW. of Vane,, 3. O. Stanton vs. X. G. Godard. L Wills, Interpretation of. Remainders, Vested Merest. Child, etc. uvtng. By th term of a will, property is de vised to the daughter, but "should she din without child' etc., then it is to be long to G. It appeared that G. and th daughter Intermarried -and had children who did not survive th mother. At th take a fee simple as no Interest vested In th children, This, both by Interpreta tion of the language of th will itself, and the rule In Revisal, section 1581, pro viding 'that, unless It la otherwise clearly expressed in the will, th children, etc., must belslive at th death of th first for th Interest to vest in tnenv . Controversy submitted withoat action, heard before Lyon. iH June term. In, ot Martin. Edward Brother va. Edwin Erwln and J. M. Piper. V Kvidenca. TOenaaa When telesrama ar Introduced in eve dne from on party to th suit to the other, telegram from the other party, received under circurr irtanoes clearly in dlcating they ar replies, can bo intro duced by tb ssun party without further proof, when thsy ar relevant to th in quiry. . -. I . ' 1. 8am. Harmless .Error. When, of a series of telegrams,' on is admitted in evidence a received in re ply to those sent, by the party -offering mem, ana n ooet on appear hi iuits u connection with th others, and has no bearing upon th facta at issue, it I harmless error.' i ' t. Judgment, Bvldenc. - Nonsuit; Bub- tantlat iaaiage, .instructions. , - When Btalntiff -ha alleged and proved raots wnica at least enuue nun to re cover nominal damages,-' arising from a breach Of contract, a motion a of non suit upon th evidence wilt not be sus tained upon tn tneory tnat a suostan damage. - nav been snown. Hie Question as to a aubstsuatlal reeovery must bs raised oy a prayer tor instruc tion. - v ' - ;v ' ' 1 Judgment,' Evidenc, Xonsuit; ; Col lateral Matters. , . v A motion as of nonsuit upoa th evi dence should not ba directed to collateral matters, and thereunder the defendant cannot successfully contend that plaintiff obtained a warrant of attachment and al leging a breach of : contract asd then complained sued - on ' contract "and laid hi proof In tort. - . : ,- - Action tried before Lyon, J . and a Jury, fad term, 130. -pf- Wilson. - t v X H. Foy vs. James O. Gray et alft, " lr Appeal and Error, Docketing Tran script, Motion to Lnsnuss, loaches ot Movant : Wben under- Rule C of - th 6inrern Court tbe appellant doe not docket his appeal "seven days before tbe call ot th district to which it belongs, snd the sp pelle defers making tne motion to dis miss until th call of th district had be gun when the tranecript on appeal .had then been docketed, the appellee ha been guilty of laches, and hi motion to dis miss will be denied. - 1 Appeal and Error, Referee's Finding of fscts. Evidence. 1 Th guprem Court Is ' bound by the findings of fsct.of the referee sustained by the trial Judge, when ther is evi dence to support them. Action from -Cravem heard en exeep. pacta to the on tn controversy, except aa to sis, tn principle oeing tn same, that th machine could not properly do the work It was Intended for, describing why, when It appear that, by training and special opportunity J not ana od- Srve relevant facts, they were qualified give an eDlnlon on th matter la Ques tion that was calculated to aid tb J ura te reeoh a correct conclusion, v . Sarah ' A.- Hargrova et al vs. John B. Wll n .-v..------.t..--F.:. . ---.: Lands, Partition, Judgments, Collateral Attack. DTaud ;t.or - Mistag. titataiory . Remedy. ; ", i ' --?. "When land l sold, and th gala en Armed, in sroeeedings -for partitloa of lands, and therecord therein la regular u ivm uu vu t ,.v. .v "m 1 plaintiffs' were parties, th prooeedlngb cannot b collaterally attacked for mis take, fraud or collusion, aa th remedy Is by petition In the caus. under R vig,i.:actMa mi.-) t:'.7,i;. B.'j. Southerlaad va..ktlantl Coast Un .Railroad Company. ... , Judxments. . IUS AdJudlcata. Evidenc, ' A Judgment ot a court of competent Jurisdiction Including an adjudication, ot a taot Controverted In a subsequent ac tion, ts perfect ' eviaenc ot ns own validity, - and th fact so determined Is res adiudicata. Therefore, when Judg ment has been rendered for damages for th loss ot freight in an action against a carrier, he carrier cannot, in a subse quent suit brought to recover a statutory penalty for delay inMttlement . for the lost freight, ' Introduc evidence tending to 'Show that It had never. In fact,' re ceived the goods, aa that issue -waa necessarily - covered, by. tha former Judg Action heard by Oulon, I, upon facta agreed, June term, 1S08, of Wayne, brought ' to recover of th defendant a penally of t for allure to settle a claim within sixty day under Revisal. sec tion at. t ' u " - J. C Andrew and RuXua Bowen va. T. C Grime. t aL . . '-., . L Claim and Cellvsry, Ownership, Evl- dence, issues. . . . , - As allerstlnn and aunnortlns svMeenAs. that certain tobaoco, th subject of claim and delivery proceedings, waa in a house on defendant's land at thalm ot the al leged sale, and, by agreement, waa to be hauiea ana aenverea t piainturs oy de fendant, is sufficient to raise th Issue "Did defendant afterwards acre with nlaintlff that the tobacco should remain on defendant' land a th property of th plaintiff l"v : - - .. - A. Pleadings, Blight Variation Disre garded, Amendments ur superior and Supreme Courts. . Very slight variation between the alle gation and tb proof ahould be disregard ed; ana wnen to tne contrary, amend ment may be permitted by the trial Judge to make them conform, RevlaaL section SOT; and also bv th Supreme Court, Re- viaai, secuon.TMS. a. Claim nd Delivery, ' Evidenc of Ownership, Rollcy. Collateral Matter. Aa evidence of ownership of a lot of tobacco In dispute, it was competent to show by. parol evidence that 11 fiai been Insured by-plaintiff as his own without putting the policy itself in evidence, aa It Was collateral to -the Inane. Action tried before W. R. Allen. J.. and a Jury, April term, 19(8, of Pitt. .Defendants sppealed. , Mounts Stajre and Klstxw Arli-net. ' SparUnburg tpecjal, 13th, to Char leston ew and Courier.. f . -Loretta Marshal!, a pretty young chorus gi"l of tha Wayne Musical Comedy Company, which closed an engagement here Wednesday nlrht. was kised fair and square on her l:ps py young McLAurin. son of the former fin., .n -,n..r, a t.r.u k w t? ii.i United (States Senator, who Is s tin. len, J., at Chamliers, 3, July, 1SCS. . Ident at Wofford College. The kissin? inaintia arpeaied. . ; ' . , j took place on the stage In full view . ; 1111 .of the audience, and was one of the House Cold Tire Better Company vs. W. hiU of the ghow. Miss Marshall came K. WhitehurstL Vendor and Vende. Co'itracts, Breach of TTniy, "Opinum t-vnieni-e." . In an action to recover the purchase rrk-e of certain machine, the detenus elng a breach of warranty. It la comte lent for witne! to tfntify, on twnalf nf defeinlsnt, that they hd used a rn i Uiloe i.e in coutrucuou and in all i- oetore in iootn?nts ana renrterel a kiwiris- aonjr. Pointing to yo-ipir J!c Laurio, who occupied en ori.:io;ra eat, ah dared him to kl.s her. - The student was gamo.'" for as quick as a flash. h Jumped On ths , staee and f ivn th - pretty . little cress . s,?v-ra macka on her rtily lips. AFTER l'HJB SMOKE OF BATTLE. "Democrat" 1ieamG y 1h ; RX5ft 'Election and - Conunenu - on the - Caaaesj of . the' 'Slomp. ".. -v ' T th Editor Of Th OUenrer: : ; Th di U cast and bay an other Republican Praaldent. ' Never la the' history, ot th nation lias ther ba a mora vigorous campaign waged than tha on Just closed. As th smoke' of th battla vanlshea, let ns calmly a patrlotlo cimens ylw th situation and uphold and strengthen th hands of him who : has bean hosea by a majority of th people to administer th laws of our treat republic . While we may not agree on all questions entortained by Mr. Taft -. and his - party, w hav In him an able, broad-minded states man, conaervatlvs and Just, who like the peerle McKlnley will be Presi dent of not on but all . sections of this country. He has, as Indicated by his popular "rote, th confidence pt th people, and front th reputation h enjoys wirl redeem th pledges he mad to them during th campaign. Whil H i gratifying to DemocraU that th .Southern States hay been allv to their interests and hav main, talned their solidity, which Is ths bul wark of their safety, it Is to b re gretted that disaffection within their borders is found to exist, which has resulted In the reducMon ef the Dem ocratic majority. Many are at sea, it seems, a to ths cause of th re dnction of the Democratic vote, espec ially in this State. - This, is easily answered. .The Legislature was call ed m extra session ostensibly to set tle the railroad rate question. - After Its disposition ther developed the prohibition question; laws were 'en acted. 'date ef .election named and campaign .Inaugurated. v running the State to expense of thousands of dot- lars : when the .'question could have been submitted to the people for their decision at the general election a few . months later. Not only this, but by ' legislation thi people were deprived -of exercising the - right of local op- tlon. j,- These were factors that eaus- ed the' slump .and one more- prohf" bltlon campaign: will not only give the . TtamiKllesns ni.in.lt. , ti.hMuH. tatlves in Congress, but the Legislature . also, i It 1 to be hoped that the Democratic member of the coming Legislature will realize the -situation -and fall , Into . no more snares, but reptr the damage. , r j-- W';mWo '. DEMOCRAT." . eenderson, Nov. iith, not, f ' -r 1 . . it Ooostltntional Amendment Passed ta ly . .. vrraer to uate pewerage. -;- r Special to The Observer. - Gaffney, S. C. Nov. 18. At tbVgen- -eral election the people of Cherokee county votea on an amendment to tne constitution to allow the City ' of Gaffney to exceed the constitutional limit of mills- In order that It might put In a sewerage system. Th 1 amendment carried by a large ma Jorlty, only two boxes In the county, Blacksburg and Aliens, voting against , It- Tbe Representative in the Gens em. Aemoiy wiu now nav it rati- . fled at the next session and the way will be clear to install . the didcV needed Sewerage system, . -'; -'. -''') Returns to North Carolina. Lenoir Kews. ' ' "In a private letter received fron Rev. H. C, Marley, of Gentry. Ark; he Inform us that he has received and accepted a call from the Baptist church at Murphy, and will be in Murphy this week. We are glad to know that the Rev. Marley la la th Old North State again. -. frotrl.' Ji'im, . ) . . . . .. 4.-. - J a. t 't 1 i v . 1 W WSfc WS)4 J j . . X W -W ayr W4k W " ', '" Tf T s , rYm 'J - - w. i sT 1 T V4" " tt ft, . f '' -' -m - - ' Trc::sutD cs r.ztz z:;:zrs r 5 t:i: .t: :iz c? r-.rr rzzizi "larite L. C -", f p A. I I U P,. r-r Tr- f ' eJ Svrmy t th l: oil I j t , - t cf t , I '. -r J rf . ., i c fit. of ths UiHoHtlf -tiil'-'-Ae 11 . 's sis toari cf Heaiik; ;.... . .,ir. , l-cMt .. r6a a: ... .s t X -..i resource. It aheuU be rec T:3T:::r:3T3 c ? r- - t tf. r. r. r no hf-'tincy in t r.;-.3itsTa f - j ; , '.-r.T. , I I V it . T tr: : ii . - -SB r Jl: - " f airr" tf T e-,ir. r h r. u -1.3
The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Nov. 16, 1908, edition 1
8
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75