PRESIDENTS JMtES8A$B.
7w the Senate and House ef Representatives
ef tkt Utiiltd Stales:
I have received (?n j. Calhoun, Esq., j
president of the late coittlittttrehal conven
tion of Kans&2$ A copy duly certified by him
self, of the constitution framed by that
body, with the expression of a hope that I
would submit the same to tliQ consideration
of Congress, "with the view of the admis
sion of KaMas into the Union as an indepen
dent State.1" In compliance with the re
quest, 1 herewith transmit to Congress, for
their action, the constitution of Kansas with
the ordinance respecting the public lands,
as well as the letter of Mr Calhoun, dated
at Lccompton on the 14th ultimo, by which
they were accompanied. Having received
but a single copy of the constitution and or
dinance, I send this to the Senate.
4V great delusion seems to pervade the pub
lic mind in relation to the condition of par
ties in Kansas. This arises from the difficulty
of inducing the American people to realize
the fact that any portion of them should be
in a state of rebellion against the govern
ment under which they live. AVhen we
speaiv or tne anmrs ot Kansas, we are apt
to reier merely to the existence of two
violent political parties in that Territory,
divided on the question of slavery, jtist as we
speak of such parties in the States. This
represents no adequate idea of the true state
of the case. The dividing-line there is not
between two political parties, both acknowl
edging the lawful existence of the govern
ment; but between those who are loyal to
this government and those who have endea
vored to destroy its existence by force and
by usurpation between tho.se who sustain
and those who have done all in their power
to overthrow the territorial government
established by Congress. This government
they would long since have subverted
had it been not protected from their as
saults by the troops of the United States.
Such has been the condition of affairs since
my inauguration. Ever since that period
a largo portion of the people of Kansas have
been in a state of rebellion against the gov
ernment, with a military leader at their head
of a most turbulent and dangerous character.
They have never acknowledged, but have
constantly renounced and defiled the govern
ment to which they owe allegiance, and
have been all the time in a state of resis
tance against its authority. They have all
the time been endeavoring to subvert it and
to establish a revolutionary government,
under the so-called Topeka constitution; in
its stead. Even at this very moment the
Topeka legislature are in session. Who
ever has read the correspondence of Gov.
Walker with the State Department, recent
ly commnnicatod to the Senate, Avill be con
vinced that this picture is not overdrawn.
He always protested against the withdrawal
of any portion of the military force of the
United States from the Territory, deeming
its presence absolutely necessary for the
preservation of the regular government and
the execution of the laws, "in his very first
despatch to the Secretary of State, "dated
June 2, 1837, says: "The most alarming
movement, however, proceeds from the as
sembling on the Dth June of the so-called
Topeka legislature with a view to the en
actment of an entire code of laws. Of course
it will be my endeavor to prevent such a
result, as it would lead to inevitable and
disastrous collision, and, in fact, renew the
civil war in Kansas." This was with diffi
culty prevented by the efforts of Gov Walk
er; but soon thereafter, on the 14th of July
we find him requesting Gen Harney to furn
ish him a regiment of dragoons to" proceed
to the city of Lawrence and this for the
reason that he had received autheutic intel
ligence, verified by his own actual observa
tion, that a dangerous rebellion had occur
red, "involving an open defiance of the laws
and the establishment of an open insurgent
government in that city."
In the governor's despatch of July 15th
he informs the Secretary of State, "that this
movement at Lawrence was the beginning
of a plan, originating in thatcitv, toorgan
ize insurrection throughout the Territory;
and especially in all towns, cities, or coun
ties where the republican party have a ma
jority. Lawrence is the hot-bed of all the
movements in this Territory. It is the town
established by the abolition societies of the
l'.U?t. nn.l -l,;i.4. il ,11
llll3L mure are respectaoie peo
ple there, it is filled by a considerable num
ber of mercenaries who are paid bv aboli
tion societies to perpetrate and diffuse agi
tation throughout Kansas, and prevent a
peaceful settlement of this question. Hav
ing failed m inducing their own so-called
lopeka State legislature to organize this
insurrection Lawrence has commenced, it
Jierself and, if not arrested, the rebellion
will extend throughout tlie Territory."
And again: "In order to send this com
munication immediately by mail, I must
close by assuring you that the spirit of re
bellion m-cvaiiM La i
publican party of this Territory, instigated,
1 "v sitaL muss 01 tne re
- v.. udi tney are, by eastern
societies, having ln view results mosl dipte
rous to the government and to the Union;
nnd that the continued presence of Gen
Harney here is mdi3pau,ible) as oriirinall..
upuiaLou uy me watli a large body of dra-
ouns iiiiu se erai oatteries:
ua ine tn duly, 1857, Gen. Lane, under
iius ttuwioniy oi ine lopeka convention, as
lov. u alter lniornis us, "to oroaniye tho
ivjioie o-tcineu iree otate party into volun
teers, ana to take tlie names of all who vp
fuse enrollment. The professed object is to
protect the polls, at the election in Auo-ust
. 1 fM ,-, O
ot tne new insurgent lopeka State lensla
tire."
" 1 he object ot taking tile names of all
who refuse enrol Imeirt is to terrify the free
State conservative into submission. This
is proved by recent atrocities committed on
fiuch men by lopefcrotes. Hie speedy loca
tion of large bodies of regular troops here
with two batteries, is necessary The Law
rence insurgents await the development o
thisnew revolutionary military organiza
tion," &c, &c.
In the governor's despatch of July 27th,
lie savs that "Gen. Lane and his staff every
where deny the authority of the territorial
laws, awd counsel a total disregard of these
enactments, '
Without making further questions of a
similar character from other despatches of
Gov. Walker, it appears by a reference to
Mr Stanton's communication to Gen. Cass,
of the yth December last, that the impor
tant step of calling the legislature together
was taken after I he had become satisfied
that the election ordered by the convention
on the 21st inst., could not be conducted
without collision and blood shed.'' So in
tense was the disloyal feeling among the
otiflmips OT the orovernment established by
Congress, that an election which afforded
them an opportunity, if in the majority, of
making Kansas a free-State, according to
their own professed desire, could not be
conducted without collision and bloodshed!
The truth is, that, up till the present mo
ment, the enemies of the exi.-sting govern
ment still adhere, to their lopeka revolution
ary constitution and government, ine very
first paragraph, of the message of Gov. Lob-'
inson, dated on the 7th December, to the
Topeka legislature now assembled at Law
rence, contains an open defiance of the
constitution and laws of the U. States. The
I Governor says: "The Convention which.
Lframed the Constitution at Topeka origina
ted with the people of Kansas territory.
They have adopted and ratified the -same
twice by a direct vote, and also indirectly
thro' two elections of the State officers and
members of the State legislature. Yet it
has pleased the administration to regard the
whole proceeding revolutionary."
This Topeka government, adhered to with
such treasonable pertinacty, is a govern
ment in direct opposition to the existing
o-overnment prescribed and recognized by
Congress. It is a
usurpation ot the same i
n .i
character as it would be for a portion of the
.
people of any State of the Union to under
take to establish a separate government,
within its limits, for the purpose of rcdres
inr any grievance, real or imaginary, of
which thev might complain, against the legi
timate State government. Such a principal
if carried into execution, would
lawful authority and produce universal an
archy. Front this stntemcnt of ficts: the reason be
comes palpable why the enemies of the iroveru-
mpnt. authorized bv Coiiaress have refused to !
vote for delegates to the Kansas constitutional
convention, and also afterwards on the question
of slavery submitted by it to the people. It is
bornnsfi thev have ever refused to sanction or
recognise any other institution than that fram
ed at Topeka.
Had the whole Lccompton Constitution been
submitted to the people, the adherents of this
organization' would thus have removed an ob
stacle out of the way of their own revolution
ary constitution. They would have done this
not upon a consideration ot the merits of the
whole or any part of the Lccompton constitution
but simply because they have .ever resisted the
authority of the government authorized by Con
gress, from which it emanated.
Such being the unfortunate condition of af
fairs in the territory, what was the right as well
as the duty of the law abiding people? Were
they silently and patiently to submit to the To
peka usurpation, or adopt the necessary meas
ures to establish a constitution under the au
thority of the organic law of Congress?
That this law recognized the risht of the
people of the territory, without any enabling
act from Congress, to form a State constitution
is too clear for argument. For Congress "to
leave the people of the territory perfectly free,"
in framing their constitution' "to form and regu
late their domestic institutions in their own way,
subject only to the constitution of the United
States;" and then to say that they shall not be
permitted to proceed and frame a constitution
in their own way without an express authority
from Congress, appears to be almost w contra
diction in terms. It would be much more
plausible to contend that Congress had no pow
er to pass such an enabling act, than to argue
that the people of a territory might be kept
out of the Union for an indefinite period, and
until it might jdease Congress to permit them
to exercise the right of self government. This
would be to adopt not "their own way," bat
the way which Congress might prescribe.
It is impossible that any people could have
proceeded with more regularity in the forma
tion of a constitution than the people of Kansas
have done. It was necessary, first, to ascer
tain whether it was the desire of the people to
be relieved from their territorial dependence
and establish a State government. For this
purpose, the territorial legislature, in 1855,
passed a law "for taking the sense of the peo
ple of the Territory upon the expediency of
cabin"- a convention to form a Slate constitu
tion" at the general election to be held in Octo
ber, 1856. The "sense of the people" was ac-j
cordingly taken, and they decided in favor of a
convention. It is true that at this election the
enemies of the territorial government did not
vote, because they were then engaged at lo
peka, without the slightest protext of lawful
authority, in framng a constitution or tueir,
own for the purpose of subverting the tcrri o-i
rial government.
In pursuance of this decision of the people in
favor of a convention, the territorial legislature,
on the 21th day of Febrnary, 1857, passed an
act for the election of delegates on the third
Monday of June 1857, to frame a btate con
stitution. Th law is as lair in its provis
ions as any that ever passed a legislative body
for a similar purpose. I he nglit ot suf
frage at this election is clearly and justly de
fined. "Every bono, fide inhabitant ot the Ter
ritory of Kansas" on the third ATonday of June,
the day of the election, who was a citizen of
the United States above1 the age of twenty-one,
and had resided therein for three months pre
vious to that date, was entitled to vote. In or
der to avoid all interference from neighboring
States or Territories with the freedom and
fairness of the election, provision was made
for the registry of the qualified voters; 'and, in
pursuance thereof, nine thousand two hundred
and fifty-one voters were registered. Gover
nor Walker did his whole duty in urging all
the qualified citizens of Kansas to vote at this
election. In his inaugural address, on the 27th
May last, he informed them that "under our
practice the preliminary act of framing a State
constitution is uniformly performed throjgh the
instrumentality of a convention of delegates
chosen by the people themselves. That con
vention is now about to be elected by you under
the call of the territorial legislature, created
and still recognized by the authority of Con
gress, and clothed by it, in the comprehensive
languageof the organic law, with full power to
make such an enactment. The territorial leg
islature, then, in assembling this convention,
were fully sustained by the act of Congress, and
the authority of the convention is distinctly
recognised in my instructions from the Presi
dent of the United States. "
The governor also clearly and distinctly warns
them what would be the consequences if they
should not participate - m tue election. Hie
, i i w " "- I '"Will ZL nUtl UILTIIIV RHII aillll
people of Kansas, then, (he says,) are mvUMlfcaflfered the election to 'n lJLu ?D
by the highest authority known to tiie consti
tution to participate, freely nnd fairly, in the
election of delegate to frame a constitution ana
State government. The law has performed its
entire appropriate function when it extends to
the neonle the ri-rht of snfFrnse, but it cannot
compel the performance t tiiat
out our Whole Union, however
i
dm 3.
, iind
ro
n-bi- - i
neicver.-Wrirmly
free government pv
a-evans, U ose w nbt ,m
or ti.rijr.lt Oi siwrag. au;'
do vote to act tor them lit
. "i
from the exercise of
thorize tho-e who
that cojitinev ; and ( lie absentees are-as niuch
bound, nndeV the law and constitution, w Mere t
there is no fraud or violence, by the act ot tlie.it he unhappy differences in Kansas. If frauds
majority of those who do vote, as if all had par- have been committed at this election, either by
ticipated in the election. Otherwise, as voting one or both parties the legislature and the peo
mnt be voluntary: sel f-LTOveriinieut would be, pie of Kansas, under their constitution, will
impracticable, and monarchy or despotism
would remain as th oalv alternative."
It may also be observed, that at ihis period
anr lmno if "such had e'vi t ed . 1 ha t t he Lo-ekal.
n.M,ti;tntmn lvnnlil nvov lio recognised by Con
gress, must have been
had adjourned on the
having recognised the
territorial legislature
abandoned.
Congress 1
31 of March previon
le'rnl exi-tenee of the,i
in a variety of forms
which I need not enumerate. Indeed, the '-ele-fliey
in
gate elected tothe House 01 i.epie"i'V',io!istiru!ion, wincii is republican 111 its rorm. 11 Js 1
idMutteds
nf tlmJr P0fr,fi tr sii hiiiit to hi W- '
ful authority and vote at the election of
authority and vote at the election or dcie- j
gites
may yet prove to he of a most deplorable j
J J I - . i
orvHiTAr 'jvi-t .f 1-1 .- r inn toc rwi i nil i ik
r T.. . , i
!l'C At tiin binr irho. i ort nmtnont I' n:r lfr 1 S
under a territorial law, had been aamitiea kr Uflmgress to ueciue whether tney will admit or
his sea and La.ljwt ' completed hi--ttjx&9ejhe State which has thn?rbeen created. For
service on" the dav iWevionS to my inauguratloai my part I am decidedly m favor of its ad
This was the propitious moment for settling j n , and thus termmating the Kansas question.
, . .' -.1 nn- .,, ,1. :, 1 1 his will carrv out the great principle ot non-
nil diPRenlties in Tv.'ins;! I US WaStliS time ; . , . . r t
au uimtumcs in jvan.as in.- i intervention recognized and sanctioned by the or-
for abandoning the revolutionary lP ffttnic act, which declares in express language in
ganization, and for the enemies of the existing; favoi. 0f "non-intervention bj- Congress with slave
government to conform to the laws, and to j rv ju t10 state or Territories," leaving "the peo
unite with its friends in framing a .State cons-, plo thereof perfectly to regulate their domestic in
titution. But this thev refused to do, and the I stitutions in their own way, subject 011I3' to the
ed the men of the past generation could be re- throughout the whole conntrjr.
vived ! It is a disregard and violation of law f It is proper that I should" briefly refer to the
which have for years kept the territory of Kan- j election held under the act of the Territorial legis
sas in a state of almost open rebellion against ! lature, on the first Monday of Jauuaiy last, on the
its government It is' the same spirit which ! Leeompton constitution. This election was held
has produced actual rebellion in Utah. Our J Slft0r the Territory had been prepared for admis
Ohlv safety consists in obedience nnd con for- "on Htotlie Union, as a sovereign State, and when
destroy allimlty 'aw- Should a general spirit against
-j -
its enforcement prevail, this will prove fatal to
us as a nation. We acknowledge no master
but the law; and should we cut loose from its
restraints, and every one do whatstemeth good
in his own c'es, our case will indeed be hope
less. j The enemies of the territorial government
j determined still to resist the authority of Con-
gress. They refuse to vote fur delegates to the
j convention not because, from circumstances
which I need net detail, there was an omission
to register the comparatively few voters who
were inhabitants of certain counties in Kansas
in the early spring of 1857, but because they ,
had predetermined at all hazards to adhere to j
their revolutionary organization, ami defeat the j
establishment ot
that which thev
a n y
hail
other constitution
tl 1
l",u I
lian
The
framed at
, 1 nil I
lopelill. 1 lie j
clcctiou was. therefore, suffered to pass by de-
fault; but of this result the qualified electors
who refused t vote, can never justly complain,
From this review, it is manifest that the Eo -
compton convention according to every nrinei -
pie of constitutional law was legally constitut-
ed and wa? invested
constitution.
with power
' "
tO frame a
The sncred principle of popular sovereignty
has been invoked in favor of the eue'mies of law
and order in Kansas. But in what manner is
popular sovereignty to be exercised in this coun
try", if not through the instrumentality of estab
lished law? In certain small republics of an
cient times the people did assemble in primary
meetings passed laws, and directed public af-
lairs. In our country this is uiain.c
sible. Popular sovcrcigt.t v can be
here only thron-ah the i :! :
people will refuse to exercise, it in t!
as they have done in Kansas at Un
pos-
ised
exs
.1 if the
manner,
ctio'i of
delegates, it is not f .! f iiern to
(omnium
that
their rights have been violated.
The Kansas convention, thus lawfully consti
tuted, proceeded to frame a constitution- and
having completed their work, finally adjourr.ed
on the 7th day of November last. Thev did
not think proper to submit the whole of this
constitution to a popular vote; but they did
, .1 . 1 ,1. TT- . l...,l.l l.rt
suomit ine quesuon v neiner "'V,'1."" "
a iree or siave rTare, to tuc peopie. im-. uj
the question which had convulsed the Union
and shaken it to its very centre. This was the
question which had lighted up the flames of
civil" war in Kansas; and had produced dange
rous sectional parties throughout the confede
racy. It was of a character so paramount in
respect tothe condition of Kansas, as to rivet
the anxious attention of the people of the whole
country upon it, and it alone. No person
thought of any other question. For my own
part, when I instructed Governor Walker, in
general terms, in favor of submitting the con
stitution to the people, I had no object in view
except the all-absorbing question of slavery.
In what manner the people of Kansas might
regulate their other concerns, was not a sub
ject which attracted any attention. In fact,
the general provisions of our recent State con
stitutions, after an experience of eighty years,
are so similar and so excellent, that ii would be
difficult to go far wrong at the present day m
framing a new constitution. -T
then believed, and still believe, that under
the organic act, the Kansas convention were
boundto submit this all-important question of
sbivervto the people. It was never However
v t . - - J I
my opinion that independently of this act they
been bound to submit any portion
of the constitution to a popular vote in order
to give it validity. Had I entertained such
an opinion this would have been in opposition
to the principle which pervades onr institutions
and which is every day carried out into practice
that the people have the right to delegate to
representatives, chosen hy themselves, their
sovereign power to frame constitutions, enact
aws and perform many other important acts,
without requiring that these should be subjoc
to their subsequent approbation. It would
be a most inconvenient limitation of their own
power, imposed by the people upon themselves
to exclude them from exercising their sov
ereignty in any lawful manner they think proper.
It is true that the people of Kansas might, if
they had pleased, have required the convention
to submit the constitution to a popular vote;
but this they have not done. The only remedy
therefore in this case, is that which exists in
no other similar cases. If the delegates who
framed the Kansas constitution have in any
manner violated the will of their constituents
the people always possess the power to change
their constitution or their laws, according to
their own pleasure.
The question of slavery was submitted to an
election of the people of Kansas o the 21st of
December last in obedience to the mandate of
the constitution. Here again, a fair opportu
nity was presented to the adherents of the To
peka constitution if they were the majority
to decide this exciting question "in their own
. mi
d thus restofe Peace to tho distrffeted
territory; but thev
rtheir riirl.t nf JT : ... i
inei
lection to nasx bv default.
neartny reioice that a wiser and better
i j
ppirit prerailed amonir a large majority of these
l'P' ' me nrst Monday ot January; and
that they did on that day, vote under the TjP-
COH)ptoii constitution for governor and other
; State ofllcers, a member of coiiaress and fr
-h-UMfcinbers of the legislature. This election
way, " an
was
Wote was polled than at any previous election
m tlie territory. We may now reasonably
. hope that the revolutionary Topeke organization
. -..-. ...
will be
speedily anl finally abandoned. and j
Ins wdl go far towards the final
seiuement oi
know how to redress themselves and punish
these detestable but too common crimes without
any outside interference.
. The people of Kansas have then, "in their own
wffr," and in strict accordance with the
no' framed a constitution and State government;
nave submitted the nU-imoortant question ot slave
ry to the people, and have elected a governor, a
member to represent them in Congress, members
of the State legislature, and other State officers.
now ask admission into the Union under this
fcr
constitution ot the L liiteci states." an Tins manner
yu u tjeiiuu y1
' ' V ' - 7 T a U n ; "tinr,
ni'rv -i-jif i-irr !nivinnc r vnof'TP.n that, this nilOT10Tl
j . - - " - - - ,.
would bo banished from tho the'Iiails ot congress,
i . . .
overfed a baneful influence
no authority existed 111 the territorial legislature
which couil possibly destroy its existence or
change its character'. The election, which was
peaceably conducted under my instructions, in
volved a strange inconsistency. A large majority
of the persons who voted against the L.ecompton
constitolion, were at the ver- same time and placr
recognising its valid ezistence in tho most solemn
and authentic manner, by voting under its provis
ions. I have yet received no official information
of the result of this election.
As a question ef expediency, after the right has
been maintained, it may be wise to reflect upon
the benefits to Kansas and to the whole country
which would result from its immediate admission
into the Union, as well as the disasters which may
follow its rejection.
Domestic peace
win oe tne
happy consequence ot its admission, and that ime
I erritorv, which has hitherto been torn by dissen-
H II . Til
sions, win rapnuv increase 111 population anu weairn
,..'.1 1:1.. 1:..., 1.1.'. ..,. 1 ..,v, r,... ..
Mill M.n rill 1 V I i'ilii.'.l- Hit nil ."'Mlli; lllil nil" iiiinutii?
,!,.,, f,.n ,-., ., fv.,:,, ,10.v,VidOii-..l nnd mocbmii-
; in,illstrv. Tlie peoplevill then be sovereign,
j al,d can regulate their own affairs in their own way.
j if a majority of them desiie to abolish domestic
j slavery within the State, there is no other possible
: mode by which this can be effected so speedily as
! hy prompt admission. The will of the majority is
' supreme aim 11 resisnoie w non cpi efcu 111 an ir-
1- r-ii - i 1-.
dcrlViaiid lawful manner. JL hey can make ana
e constitutions at pleasure. It would be
absurd to say that thev can impose fettes upon
their own power which they cannot afterwards re-
move. It they could do this thev might tie their
own hands for-100 as well as for " years. These
are fundamental principles of American freedom,
and are recognised, I believe, in some form or
other, by every State constitution; and if Congress, !
in the act of admission, should think proper to re- j
cognise them, I can perceive no objection to such
a course. This has been done emphatically in the !
constitution or Kansas. It declares in the lull ot
rights that '-ai; political power is innerent m tne)
people, and all free governments are founded on
their authority and instituted for their benefit, and
therefore they have at all times an inalienable and
indefeasible right to alter, reform, or abolish their
firm of government in such manner as they may
think proper." The great State of New York is
at this moment governed under a constitution
framed and established in direct opposition to the
mode prescribed by the previous constitution. If
therefore, the provision changing the Kansas con
stitution, after the year one thousand eight lmn
; dred ond sixtv-four, could by .possibility be con-
i strued into a prohibition to
make such a change
previous to that period, this prohibition would be
wholly unavailing. The legislature already elected
may, at its very first session, submit the question
to a vote of the people whether they will or will not
have a. convention to amend their constitution, and
adopt all necessary means for giving effect to the
popular will.
It has been solemnly adjudged by the highest
judicial tribunal known to our laws, that slavery
exists in Kansas by virtue of the constitution of
the United States. Kansas is. therefore, at this
moment as much a slave State as Georgia or South
Carolina. Without this the equality of the Sover
eign States composing the Union would be viola
ted, and the use and enjoyment of a territory ac
quired by the common treasure of all the States,
would be closed against the people and property of
nearly half the members of the confederacy. Slave
ry, therefore, ecu never be prohibited in Kansas
except by means of a constitutional provision, and
n no other manner can this be obtained so prompt
y, if a majority of the people desire it, as by ad
mitting it into the Union under its present consti
tution. On the other hand should Congres reject the con
stitution, under the idea of affording the disaffected
in Kansas a third opportunity of prohibiting slave-
; r ;n the State, which they might have done twice
j before if in the majority, no man can foretell the
consequences.
It Congress, tor the sake 01 those men wiio re
fused to vote for delegates to the convention when
they might have excluded slavery from the con
stitution, and who afterwards refused to vote on
the 21st December last, when they might, as they
claim, have stricken? slavery from the constitution,
should now reject the State because slavery re
mains in the constitution, it. is manifest that the
agitation upon this dangerous subject will be . re
newed in a more alarming form than it has ever
yet assumed.
Every patriot in the country had indulged in the
hope that the Kansas and Nebraska act would
put a final end to the slavery agitation, at least in
Congress, which had for more than twenty years
convulsed the country and endangered the Union.
This act involved great and fundamental principles
and if fairly carried into effect will settle the
question. Should the agitation be again revived,
should the people of the sister States be again es
tranged from each other with more than their for
mer bitterness, this will arise from a cause, so far
as the interests ofKansas are concerned, more tri
fliriT and insignificant than has ever stirred the
elements of a great people into commotion. To
the people of Kansas, the only practical difference
between admission or rejection, depends simply
upon the fact whether they can themselves more
sneedilv change the present constitution if it does
not accord with the will of the majority, or frame a
second constitutiou to be submitted to Congress
hereafter. Even if this were a question of mere
expediency, and not of right, the small difference
of time, one way or the other, is of not the Least
importance when contrasted with the evils which
must necessarily result to the whole country from a
revival of the slavery agitation.
In considering this question, it should never be
forgotten that, in proportion to its insignificance,
i . . , i . ""'L "o'"cu an unuue proportion or puuno at-
contested bv the parties, and a l r. i tention. ti, u.. ,n . .k. .l.
ct the decision be what it may, so far as it may
affect the few thousand inhabitants of Kansas who
have from the beginning resisted the constitution
and laws, for this very reason the rejection of the
constitution will be so much the mere keenly felt by
the people of fourteen of the States of the Unionf
where slavery is recognised under the constitution
of the United States.
Again: The speedy admission of Kansas into the
Lnioii would restore peace and quiet to the whole
(country. Already the affairs of the Territory
nave eiiTrnoil nn :. f ,.1 i;,.
onsof the people of the States with each other,
"Waied the fears of patriots for the safety of
ue Lm.n- Kansas once admitted into the Union,
1I! f VCl trim --v a. 1- .
awiv fV,i-
.wf ecomos localized, and will soon die
want of outside aliment. Then
dimcultv will i. I , , . ilJ
every
I shall then be enabled "to" 3.
"m.-? is iiii I I Ml t II I r
tt;...i o
,""".v .ol,i:e9 Irom Kansas, and cmnW il..n
. .. urre iney are much needed
They have been kept there, on the earnest Lnntr
tumty of Gov Walker, to maintain the exUtei.c of
the territorial government and secure the execution
t the laws. lie considered that at least two thou
sand regular troops, under the. command of Gen
iraiiciir.i ioy, w i i? t - .
narney, were necessary tor this purpose. Acting
upon his reliable information, I have been obliged
in some degree, fo interfer'ejwith the expedition to
Utah, in order to keep down rebellion in Kansas.
This has involved a very heavy expense to the go
vernment. Kansas once admitted, it is believed
there will no longer be an 3-occasion there for troops
Gt the United States.
I have thus performed my duty on this important
question, under a deep sense of responsibility to
God and my c'ountrj'.- My public life will termi
nate within a brief period; and I have no other ob
ject of earthly ambition than to leave ni' country in
a peaceful and proerous condition, and to live in
the affections and respect of my countrymen. The
i dark and ominous clouds which now appear to be
impending over the L 111011, 1 conscientious!' believe
may be dissipated with honor to every portion of it,
hy the admission of Kansas during the present ses
sion of Congress; whereas if she should be rejected,
I greatly fear these clouds will become darker and
more ominous than an- which have cve-et threa
tened the constitution and the Union.
JAMES BUCHANAN.
Washington, February, 2. 1858.
Democratic Meeting in Mecklenburg.
Pursuant to previous notice, a portion of the
Democrats of Mecklenburg county assembled
at the Court House in Charlotte 011 the 2Gth
ult., for the purpose of appointing delegates to
the Democratic State Convention to be held in
Charlotte on the 14th April next.
On motion, John Walker, Esq., was called
to the chair,- and Wm. J. Yates, appointed
Secretary
The object of the meeting having been ex
plained, on motion of It. 1'. Waring, Esq., the !
Chairman was requested to appoint a commit-j
tee of five to prepare resolutions for the action i
of the meeting. The chairman appointed W. j
M. Matthews, J. M. Hutchison, J. M. Potts,!
11. P. Warring and Wm. J. Yate:
who after i
consuitation, reported the following prei'.m!;le
and resolutions:
Whereas the State Executive Committee
have selected Charlotte as the place for the
assembling of the Democratic State Conven
tion of North Carolina to nominate a candidate
for Governor, therefore,
esolved, 2 hat the Demoeny of .Mecklen
burg unite in extending to their brethren in
ail parts of the State a cordial invitation to
meet them in Convention on the 14th of April
next.
Resolved, That the Chairman of this meet-
j nig appoint 100 delegates to represent t lie co.,
j of Mecklenburg in said Convention,
j Resolved, That, reposing entire confidence
j in the Convention, and believing that it will
j select none other than an honest, capable ami
j faithful Democrat to bear the democratic stan
dard in the approaching canvass, we til edge
'our hearty support to the nominee of the Cou
i vention.
j Resolved, That we adhere to the ancient
land-marks of the Democratic faith to State-
lugnis anu strict construction to those priu-
ciples which have for so long a
time. and so
often, received the approbation and endorse
ment, of the American people, and that we de
clare our unalterable opposition to any and all
schemes tending to divert the public domain
from the purposes contemplated by the Federal
Constitution; believing that the public lands,
and the revenue derived therefrom; should be
applied exclusively to defraying the legitimate
expenses of the General Government.
Resolved, That our present Chief Magistrate
Thomas Bragg, by his faithful administration
of the State government, and his devotion to
the interests of the people, deserves the appro
bation of all good citizens, and we hereby len
der our cordial approval of his course.
Resolved, That we endorse the course of our
Representative in Congress, lion. Burton
Craige, as well as that of the entire democrat
ic delegation from this State.
Resolved, That the administration of James
Buchanan meets our hearty endorsement that
he has been tried and not found wanting and
that especially, we will stand by the man who
stands by the Leeompton Constitution.
On motion of W. A. Owens, Esq , the reso
lutions were unanimously adopted. .
The Chairman then appointed the following
gentlemen as delegates:
Win Ileid, J M Potts, T N Alexander, W M
Mathews, Win Ma'xwell, J Miller, 11 P Warring,
li AVallace, II M Prichard, Wilson Wallace, Hugh
Kfrkpatrick, John E Brown, W A Owens, S II
Kirkpatrick, David Parks?, T T Johnson, S A Har
ris. J P Boss, T II Brem, It Peoples, 11 II Swarm
G W Caldwell, W S Prather, W A Harrison, A C
Williamson, Silas Tedd W H Walker, II LaF
Alexander, I Grier, W L Houston, J M Hutchison
J S Uribhle, W Wallace, W Ii Mvers, Z Morris,
M N Hart W F Davidson, Zenas " A Grier, A H
Brown, S W Davis, Alex Cooper, It M White, F
Phifer, liich'd Kozzell, Joseph Erwin, E O Grier,
David Allen, B Morvow. J li Kerr, Thos Hunter,
B H Garrison, J K Harrison, Col T Hunter, T T
Sandier, C J Fox, James Johnson, F H Maxwell,
A C Steele, T C Neel, Wm McComb, M D L Me
Leod, C T Alexander, J A Cannon, T C Gillespie,
Chas G Alexander, J B Stewart, Jas A Sadler,
II II Peoples, S II Elliott, 11 II Maxwell, AV S
Norment, G W McDonald, S A Davis, J M Strong
W J Kerr; S Ar Morrow, AV"m G Garrison, J P
Heath, F AV AVilliamson AVui Patterson, T B
Price, J II AArhite, Jas Johnston, S J Lowrie, I N
Alexander. E A McCaulev, J II Gibbon, Capt,
John Kirk, E B D Sloan, C Flow, Harvey, AVal
lace, AVm Stiuson, iM M Orr, J Ar lloss, W Stitt,
Ezekiel Johnson, J B Robertson, Arthur Grier.
On motion of A C Williamson, Esq., the
Chairman and Secretary were added to the
delegation. The Meeting was addressed by W
A Owens, and Wm. J Kerr, Esq'rs, in short
aud appropriate speeches.
On motion of Col. J M Potts, David Parks,
Esq., ( Mayor of the Town) J. M Hutchison,
Edwin A. Yates, AV" A Owens ai.d AVra. J.
Kerr, were appointed a Committee to prepare
a place for the assembling of the Convention,
and to make such other arrangements as may
be thought necessary.
It was ordered that the proceedings of the meet
ing be published in the Western Democrat, and
that other democratic papers be requested to
copy. "
JOHN WALKER, Ch'n.
Wm. J. Yates, Sec'y.
The virtue of prosperity is temperance the
virtne of adversity is fortitude.
Democratic Meeting in Catawbi
County.
tt a Democratic Meeting held in Newton,
at the January County Court, on motion of J
P. llowe, Capt. T. W. Bradburn was called to
the Chair, and O. M. Yoder was appointed
Secretary..
Upon a call from the Chairman Wm. Lan
der, Esq., in his usual eloquent manner, ex
plained the object of the meeting.
The following resolutions, which were inrto
duced by George Setzer, Esq., and upon which
David Schenuck, Esq., of Gaston, being called
by the meeting, delivered a highly appropriate;
address, were unanimously adopted.
Wheteas, The Democratic Contention to
nominate a candidate for Governor will soon
meet, and as the people of Catawba desire to
be represented m said Convention, therefore,
Resolved, That the Chairman of this meet-r
ing appoint one hundred delegates to represent
us in said Convention.
Kesclved, That we heartily endorse the Ad
ministration of President Buchanan, and that
we will do all in our power to aid him in carrv-'
nig out the principles of the Cincinnati and
Baltimore platforms.
Resolved, That Governor Bragg has natri-
ilvl miwuuuy periurmeu the responsi
ble duties devolved upon him, and that he de
serves the thanks of every true North Caroli
nian, on his retirement of office
Resolved, That North Carolina is able, and"
that she should complete her system of Inter
nal Improvements, already commenced.
Resolved, That we are. entirely opposed to
Distribution, as unconstitutional and unjust;
and that we will do all in our power to defeat
the measure.
Resolved, That the Hon. John W Ellis by
his unswerving devotion to the principles of
our party and the true interests of tho State,
as well as by his ability, patriotism, and in
tegrity, has endeared himself to the Democracy
of North Carolina; and that, while we are wil
ling to support any true Democrat, we suggest
his name to the Convention as our first choice
for the nomination.
Resolved, Tlmt these proceedings be pub
lished in the Republican JJanner; and that the
other Democratic papers: of the State be re
quested to copy'.
In compliance 'with the first resolution, the
following delegates were appointed :
IT C" . ..Ml t 1 n
ii oi;i-i.-.ii, v u i:ioiig, A U
ran.
James Cline, Daniel Cline, Sen., John Hoke,
Sen., Prank lloke, Sen., Frank Hoke, Jr , Dr.
P Youiit, II. Yo.11 ut, Esq., Lafayette Yount, F
Yount, Jo.-hua Little, M Moser, G G llat.cl,
II Ingold, Eq., Eli Sigman, David Miller, C
W Herman, Esq., Capt. Wm. Herman, Henry
Herman, James Setzer, C llenkel, Wm. Long,
Esq., J J Sliiif'ord, L Shnford, F Viirner, Dr.
Powel, Jos. Lowrarce, Esq., John llov, Dr.
Gibson, Dr. Sherriil. J Caldwell, Esq.". Wm.
Caldwell, Thos Wilkinson, Esq.. G W Rontli,
.1 J WilM.n. Fraik Setzer. Dr. 11 W Conner.
John
Lutes.
Abe-!
Boiick
Yoder,
Hall,
Rhone.
Kii'ioii, John Whitcner, J Lutes, X
Mid. J Bust, P Burns, Esq , C Frazier,
Fry', A S Robinson, II Rcinhanit, D
, Geo. Setzer, Sr., (J Setzer, Jocob
J Yoder, I" Warlick, J Mosteilcr, J
Isaac Johnson, W Bandv, A Mull, J
r, D .Mn Her, John Ward, D Seittz, G D
iiiteiier,
Wilson, I)
J J Sigmon, M M Wilson. G 11
Seitz, D Leonard, Robert Helton,
T L Lowe. John II Robinson. F I) Reiiilnirdf.
R Setzer, D Setzer, John Wilfong, (i M Wil
long, Jethro Robinson, David Robinson, I) H
rWhitener. II A Forney. J W Gaifher. D
Rowe, P Rowe, M Herman, Lawsou Fry, M
Cline, Henry Cline, D Smyer, Eli Smycr.
On motio:-, the President and Secretary'
were added to the list of delegates.
T. W. BRADBURN, President.
G. M. 1 onion Secretary.
Superior Courts Sp.-ing Circuits.
The Judges of the Supreme Courts of this
State will ride the Spring Circuits as follows :
Edeuton Circuits,
Judge Die!
Newbern,
Raleigh,
llillsboro,
AVilmington,
Salibury,
Mountain,
Caldwell
E11L-.
Saunders.
Manlv.
Bailey.
Person.
Stand anl.
Rol
SFIf nobler sentiments than the following, says
the New York Mirror, which were uttered by
Daniel ATcbster, ever fell from human lips, we
have yet to see them They are, indeed, pearls
of the rarest value, which should be cherished
in the very heart of hearts by every one:
It is only shallow minded pretenders who
make distinguished origin cither a matter of
personal honor or personal reproach. A man
who is not ashamed of himself need not be
ashamed of his ear!' coudition. It did happen
tome to be bom in a log cabin, raised among
the 5iiow drifts of New Hampshire at a period
so early that when the smoke first rose from
its chimney, and curled over the frozen hills
there was no similar evidence of a white man's
habitation between it and the settclmeut on the
rivers of Canada'. Its remains still exist; I
make it an annual visit. I carry my children
to it, and teach them the hardship ci pnrcd by
the generation before them. I love to dwell 0,1
the tender recollections, the kindred ties, the
early affections, and the narrations and inci
dents which mingle with all I know o this qrim
itive family abode. I weep to think that none
of those who in hapited it are now among the
living; and if ever I fail in affectionate venera
tion for him who raised it and defended it
against savage violence and destructions, cher
ished all domestic comforts beneith its roof, and
through the fire and blood of seven years' rev
olutionary war, shrunk from no toil, no sacri
fice to serve his country and loraise his children'
for a condition bitter than his own may my
name and the name of posterity be blotted from
the memory of mankind.
. a . .
The Gold Coi.vage of the United States,
Since the establishment of the Mint in 1102,
according to the American Almanac, the amount
01 goia coin issued to tne close or 104'J, was
$79,923,202; from I860 to the close of 1857,
it was $425,889,738; making a total gold coi
nage of $505,812,940.
At the commencement of 1850, the amount
of specie in the United States was estimated to
be $114,000,000; the amount of gold received
from California, tothe close of 1857; has ben
estimated t be $630,000,000; the amount of
specie brought into the country by emigrants
during the last eight years is estimated to be
100,000,000; making a total of $884,000,000.
AVithin the last eight years according to the
Report of the Secretary of the Treasury, there
have been exported in specie (Jess imports)
$200,983,860; leaving the amount existing, at
the present time, in the United States, in the
shape of coin, ballion4 plate, Jewelry, &c, of
$643,016,140.
Prior, to the discovery of the California
mines, the United States were importers of the
precious metals; but since that event the posi
tion has been reversed.
'Who knows what a day may bring forth?'
as the man said, when he woke up in the morn
ing and found himself in the gutter.