_ k
The Alamance Gleaner
Vol LXXI GRAHAM, N. C., THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 1945 No. 27
i ???????? ??
WEEKLY NEWS ANALYSIS
Internal Reform Faces Britain,
But Diplomacy to Remain Same;
Allies Give Japs Peace Terms
by Western Newspaper Union. -J
(EDITOR'S NOTE: When eslnleas are expresses la these eelamae. they are these ef
Western Newspaper Union's news analysts ani net neeeesartly ef this newspaper.)
With the war in the Paeille in the decisive stare, map shows disposi
tion at Japanese forces throughout Asiatic theater.
GREAT BRITAIN:
Future Outlook
Though profoundly affecting Great
Britain's internal economy, the
sweeping victory of the Laborites in
tiie first general election since 1935
Is not expected to appreciably alter
the country's foreign policy based
en maintenance of the empire to as
sure comparatively high living
standards.
Notwithstanding the fact that the
Laborite triumph represented the
ascendancy of leftism in the United
Kingdom, the fact remains that the
country is so dependent upon the
empire for raw materials and mar
kets to support its industrial struc
tura that retention of tie* abroad,
ctrength on the seas and control over
vital bases undoubtedly will remain
the substance of its foreign policy.
With Laborites ruling, concessions
may be made to Leftist elements in
Europe and elsewhere, but in over
all policy, Great Britain's historic
diplomacy will remain essentially
British.
At home, however, tradition-bound
old Britain may be in for a radical
remodeling, with the Laborites' plat
form for nationalization of industry
tempered by the amount of private
management that will be tolerated.
Under Prime Minister Clement Att
lee, former Minister of Labor Ernest
Bevin and ex-Minister of Home Se
curity Herbert Morrison, goals of
the Laborites include:
Consolidation of all railroads,
commercial carriers on highways
and coastal shipping into one trans
portation unit under government
control; nationalization and mech
anization of all coal mines and im
provement of working conditions by
increasing production; socialization
La bo rites Atttee, Morrison, Bevin.
. . . i
ui uie iron ana sxeei mausixy ana
the Bank of England.
SECURITY CHARTER:
Fight Ahead
With only a scorching address by
Senator Wheeler (Dem., Mont.)
marring the even temper of the de
bate, the United Nations security
charter headed for quick senate
ratification, with indications that the
big battle lies ahead when the upper
chamber will consider the powemf
the U. S. delegate and the contribu
tion of armed forces.
Declaring that like President Wil
son the late Mr. Roosevelt-had jeop
ardized the prospects for successful
postwar collaboration by conces
sions to the major European pow
ers, Wheeler himself foreshadowed
an impending fight over details of
U. 8. participation. Though be would
vote for ratification, he said, he
would do so only on the strength of
statements that the senate would
later work out operational arrange
ments.
Prior to Wheeler's speech. Sena
tors Connelly (Dem., Texas) and
Vandenberg (Rep., Mich.) advocat
ed ratification, stressing that the se
curity pact in no way affected
U. S. sovereignty but did provide
the country with an opportunity to
exercise its sell-determination for
effective international co-operation
to prevent future warfare.
PACIFIC:
Allied Terms
Trembling under the bombard
ment of Allied air and naval forces,
Japan was threatened with even
greater catastrophe by U. S., British
and Chinese chieftains unless the na
tion gave up the hopeless fight and
set about the establishment of a
peaceful and democratic rule.
The Allied answer to ramoant
peace talk, the U. S., British and
Chinese declaration issued in Pots
dam where the Big Three met,
called upon the enemy to rout its
militaristic leadership, relinquish
control ol 'conquered territory, and
submit to occupation for fulfillment
of terms. In return, political and
religious thought would be respect
ed, and Japan eventually permitted
to resume its place in foreign trade.
Though issued from Potsdam,
Russia conspicuously refrained from
Joining in the declaration, lending
credence to reports that the Soviets
had acted as middlemen in a Jap
peace overture, expressing willing
ness to comply with major Allied
terms, but asking for exemption
from occupation of the home islands.
Even as the Allies called upon
Japan for unconditional surrender,
Admiral "Ball" Halsey's mixed
U. 8. and British aircraft carrier
force continued its heavy attacks on
Nippon, with one great 1,200-plane
strike farther battering the enemy's
already stricken navy.
Sweeping in against minor oppo
sition, Halsey's Hellcats ripped up
20 Japanese warships in the Inland
sea, with three battleships, six air
craft carriers and five cruisers dam
aged. As a result of the attack,
the enemy reportedly has few war
ships in commission, with, most of
these being cruisers and destroyers.
In addition to hammering the Jap
anese fleet units, Allied carrier pi
lots continued to whittle down en
emy air strength, and also further
disrupted coastal shipping linking
uic uwiiic isiaiius ?-jj ui uig vui gw
vessels and small barges.
FRANCE:
Petain Accused
As the dramatic trial of Marshal
Henri Petain moved smoothly fol
lowing a stormy outburst on the
opening day over a barb by Pros
ecutor Andre Mornet that there
were too many German-minded
spectators present, none of the prin
cipal witnesses against the old sol
dier openly accused him of betray
ing his country. They charged he
failed in his duties as a Frenchman.
Nevertheless, former Premier
Paul Reynaud and Eduard Dala
dier and ex-President Albert Lebrun
rapped Petain unmercifully for ne
gotiating an armistice with the Ger
mans while an effort was made to
keep up the fight; assuming supreme
power and virtually ruling by de
cree, and acceding to Nazi requests
for manpower and material.
In testifying for the state, Dala
dler declared that France was not
as weak materially at the time of
her defeat as generally suspected,
but fell because of errors in con
ception on the part of the general
staff. Declaring the Germans were
amazed to find huge quantities of
equipment on hand, be said France
possessed 3,800 tanks at the time
of the invasion of Holland and Bel
gium to the enemy's 3,300.
PRICE CONTROL:
To Stick
Despite the impending relaxation
of price control over minor items,
firm regulation will be maintained
over principal products and services
until supply balances demand so as
to avert postwar inflation, OP Ad
ministrator Chester Bowles de
clared.
In loosening up on price control
on minor items, OPA will take action
when the commodity or service is
not essential; continued regulation
involves difficulties out of propor
tion to the importance of the prod
uct, and no materials, facilities or
manpower will be diverted from
more necessary industries.
Because various manufacturers
will be in the market for vast quan
tities of raw materials to All orders,
and civilian demand for essential
goods, food and many services will
far exceed supply, maintenance of
price control in the immediate post
war period will be required for curb
uig iiuiana; yiivca, uuwico oam.
WAR CONTRACTS:
Keep Cutting
With war production down B per
cent from the peak level of March,
the impact on the economy will grow
as more reductions are made on
actual work rather than on paper
commitments. By the end of the
year, munitions output is expected
to drop 32 per cent below the March
figure.
Whereas cancellations of paper
commitments comprised 31 per
cent of the cutbacks in April and
14 per cent in May, such reductions
made up only 5 per cent of the total
in June.
Reflecting cutbacks, aircraft pro
duction was down 10 per cent in
June under May; ships, including
maintenance and repair, down 5 per
cent; guns and fire control, down 13
per cent; ammunition and bombs,
down 16 per cent; combat and motor
vehicles, down 8 per cent; commu
nications and electronic equipment,
down 5 per cent, and other material
and supplies up 1 per cent.
Matador Up in Air
Unusual photo show* Matador Canitas
tossed into air off of buWs head during
fight in Madrid ring. But slightly hurt, the
dashing Canitas resumed the duel to ul
timately thrust his sword through animaT*
heart and win the match.
UNITED NATIONS:
Relief Requests
Having already distributed $296,
563,000 worth of relief to Greece,
Italy, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugo
slavia, China and Albania, the Unit
ed Nations Relief and Rehabilitation
administration (UNRRA) has been
asked for $700,000,000 of assistance
by Russia.
At the same time, Deputy
UNRRAdministrator Roy F. Hen
drickson revealed that trucks con
stituted the No. 1 priority for relief
shipments to facilitate the move
ment of European crops.
Under UNRRA regulations, unin
vaded nations are supposed to con
tribute both toward the relief and
administrative expenses of the proj
ect, with the invaded countries chip
ping in only for running the organi
zation. Of the $1,862,788,348 of au
thorized contributions of participat
ing nations, it was revealed, the
u. ?>. snare amounts 10 *i,aou,uw,
000.
SUEZ TOLLS:
U. S. Balks
With U. S. troops pouring through
the Suez canal en route to the Pa
cific, and with toll payments already
mounting to over $11,000,000, the
government again pressed the Brit
ish to absorb such charges under
reverse lend-lease.
In pressing the British, American
authorities pointed out that the
U. S. defrays the cost of British
ships passing through the Panama
canal, with such payments already
past the $8,000,000 mark.
Because the lend-lease act pro
vides that a country can supply aid
from purchases with its own money,
the British say they are hot obliged
to pay the canal tolls, since they
must be made in Egyptian currency.
As it is, the British declare, they
already owe Egypt large sums for
wartime purchases.
Newspaperman Stuff:
Add Thlnfi I Never Knew Till
Now: In 1811 a newspaperman
named Nathaniel Raunsavelt waa
taken into custody lor refusing to
divulge the source of his information
about the secret activities of some
politicos. ... He was threatened
and cajoled but stood firm. . . . Thus
was established the principle of the
reporter's duty to protect his news
source. ... The first American news
paper was discontinued by authori
ties because it published some gos
sip about the family troubles of the
King of France.
Heywood Broun was a skilled ex
ponent of the rapier retort. He di
rected some of his most devastating
arguments against Huey Long. . . .
He once accused Huey of "murder
ing the truth." Long promptly
shrieked for a retraction. . . . Broun
replied: "Huey says that he never
murdered the truth. That's because
he never gets near enough to do it
any bodily harm."
Alone similar lines there's the
classic abont the small town gs
sette which conducted a vigorous
campaign against the town
council One of their yarns
was headlined: "Half the Town
Council Are Crooks." . . . The
on traced politico* demanded an
apology, and the editor prom
ised to ran one. . . . Next day
the dally carried this headline:
"Half the Town Council Are Not
Crooks."
Abont a century ago the press was
in its Mother Hubbard stage. . . .
Namby-pamby ism was rampant. Ed
itors took a lorgnette view of the
news. This sidelight illustrates their
ultra fuddy-duddy attitude: One ga
sette front-paged an apology to its
subscribers because a reporter had
used the word "trousers" in a yarn
when he should have used the word i
"unmentionables" I
Tiffs among newsboys nowadays
belong in the taffy-pull category
when compared with the Journalistic
slug-fests during the James Gordon
Bennett era. . . . Bennett was phys
ically assaulted a half-dozen times
by opposition editors who had been
clawed by his barbed-wire editori
als. . . . But Bennett refused to di
lute his potent attacks against com
petitors. He merely reported the
brawls on his gazette's front page
and reaped added circulation. . . .
The anti-Bennett Journalistic bar
rage also blasted his family. The
slanderers finally drove his wife and
coiiaren uui 01 uie country, iney
moved to Europe end made infre
quent visits to America, while Ben
nett continued his free-swinging
style of journalism.
Joseph Poll tier's N. Y. World set
journalistic standards few newspa
pers have equalled. Yet Pulitzer ar
rived in America a poor, friendless,
semi-illiterate immigrant. Ha spent
all his spare time educating him
self. . . . His enlightened opinions
on the subject of newspapers are
always worth absorbing. . . . Friz
ample: "What is everybody's busi
ness is nobody's business?except
the journalist's, ft is his by adop
tion. But for his care every reform
would be stillborn. He holds of
ficials to their duties. He exposes
secret schemes of plunder. He pro
motes every hopeful plan of prog
ress. Without him public opinion
would be shapeless and dumb. Our
Republic and its press will rise or
fall together. An able, disinterested,
public-spirited press, with trained
intelligence to know the right and
courage to do it, can preserve that
Dublic virtu# without which nnmilnr
government is ? sham and mock
ery."
Hollywood has depleted foreign
correspondents as overgrown Rover
Boys. ... It has created the impres
sion that those newsboys have a
glamorous occupation. Actually they
hava a difficult, perilous task with
few rewards. . . . O. D. Gallagher,
a British correspondent, dodged
bombs and bullets, and traveled 100,
000 miles in three years for his news
stories, which readers forget Ave
minutes after reading.
This is the wisest counsel for
colyumlsta we have come across:
"Get around town?And out what
people are talking about Give your
readers a little dally Jolt an some
thing they are gabbing about at
home, perhaps, and can gab about
gome mora. Controversial stuff?so
they can argue. The big idea is
this: Make half of them happy and
half of them sore."
Uncle Sam Reports on His Real Estate Deals 1
With His Red Children; He Bought 2,600,000 1
Square Miles at Average of 48 Cents an Acre 1
By ELMO SCOTT WATSON
RtltiMd by Weitern Ntvipaptr Union.
RECENTLY the department
> of the interitor issued a new
colored map, the first of its kind,
which shows how Uncle Sam
since 1790 has acquired the na
tion's public domain from 66
principal Indian tribes by some
389 treaties and numerous acts
of congress. A study of this map
shows that these cessions by the
red man constitute about 95%
of the public domain, or some
thing like 2,600,000 square miles.
Tn cn for no fVia o Ctrrportotn nnei ?
Ml OV MAC Uggl Vgd won ?
of this land was approximately
$800,000,000?that means a little '
more than $307 a square mile or ]
approximately 48 cents an acre
?it would seem that Uncle Sam
certainly got a bargain in these
dealings with his red children.
In a statement issued at the time
the map was released. Secretary
Harold Ickes of the department of
the Interior declared that "while
questions are still frequently raised
as to whether the Indians received
fair prices for their land, the rec
ords show that, except in a very
few cases where military duress was
present, the prices were such as to
satisfy the Indiana. Discussions of
enchancement of land prices from
original costs to the present esti
mated value of nearly 40 billion
dollars only lead to idle specula
tion. There is no equitable basis of
value comparison then and now.
"Some Black Pages."
"While the history of our dealings
with the Indians contains some
black pages, since the days of the
early settlers there has been a fixed
policy based upon the principle of
free purchase and sale In dealings
between the native inhabitants of
the land and the white immigrants.
In no other continent has any seri
ous attempt ever been made to deal
. with a weak aboriginal population
I on these terms.
"While the 19 million dollars that
we paid to Napoleon in the Louisiana
| Purchase was merely in compensa
tion for his cession of political au
thority, we proceeded to pay the In
. rlion friKno n# fkn
more than 20 times this sum for such
lands as they were willing to sell.
Moreover, the Indian tribes were
wise enough to reserve from their
cessions sufficient land to bring
them an income that each year ex
ceeds the amount of our payment to
Napoleon." -
It is true, as Secretary Ickes says,
that in the majority of cases the
Indians probably received a fair
price for their lands since there is
no equitable basis of value compari
son, but it is doubtful if the Sioux,
the Nez Perces, the Modocs and the
PoQcas?to name only a few?would
agree with Mr. Ickes that the "prin
ciple of free purchase and sale" had
been observed in their dealings with
the Great White Father. Certainly
they have reason to regard his treat
ment of them as some of the "black
pages" which the secretary men
tions, in which "military duress"
was very definitely present.
Louisiana Territory.
Since Mr. Ickes mentions the Lou
isiana Purchase, it might be well
to examine briefly the record of our
government's dealings with one of
the aboriginal occupants of that re
gion, the Sioux. For generations
these Dakotas had occupied a vast
empire along the Missouri river, in
cluding most of the present states of
North and South Dakota and parts
I of Nebraska, Wyoming and Mon
tana. Gradually their territory had
been reduced by a series of treaties
until they held only their choicest
hunting grounds in the Black Hills,
the Powder river country and the
Big Horn mountains.
That was guaranteed to them, by
the Fort Laramie treaty of 1868. as
a "permanent reservation" and, be
tides. they were granted, (or as long
as there were buffalo on the plains,
"the right to hunt on any land north
of the Platte." This reservation was
to be considered "unceded Indian
territory" in which "no white per
son or persons ahall be permitted to
settle or occupy any portion of the
same or, without the consent of the
Indians first had and obtained, to
pass through the same." Moreover,
it was agreed that no subsequent
treaty should be considered valid
"unless executed and signed by at
least three-fourths of all the adult
male Indians occupying and inter
ested in the same."
The government kept its promise
ess than a year. Four months after
he President had proclaimed the
rort Laramie treaty, General Sher
nan (noted for his only-good-Indian
s-a-dead-Indian philosophy) issued
in order that all Indians not actually
>n their reservations were to be
mder the Jurisdiction of the army
ind "as a rule will be considered
lostile." Then came the announce
nent that the Northern Pacific rail
oad was to be built across the north
;ro part of the Sioux hunting lands
ind soon afterwards the Great White
father sent surveyors, protected by
loldiers, into this region without tak
ng the trouble to ask the Sioux
lor permission to "pass through the
lame."
In 1874 Gen. George A. Custer and
lis Seventh cavalry were sent to ex
plore the Black Hills?again without
lsldng permission of the Sioux to
whom Pah-sah-pah (the Black Hills)
was almost sacred soil. Then a
newspaper man who accompanied
Custer flashed to the world the elec
trifying news that gold had been dis
covered in the Hills and Custer's of
ficial report not only confirmed
this but it was also an ecstatic de
scription of the beauties of that re
gion. The result was inevitable.
'Justified' Treaty Breach.
Prospectors and miners flocked to
the new El Dorado. For a time the
government went through the mo
tions of expelling the intruders, then
gave it up as a hopeless job. Hav
ing failed to keep the whites out of
the Black Hills, the government's
next step was to find some way to
justify this violation of the Laramie
treaty. A good excuse came when
several bands of the Sioux, notably
Sitting Bull's Hunkpapas and Crazy
Horse's Oglalas, who were hunting
in the Powder river country (as they
had a perfect right to do) failed to
return to their reservations within
the tune limit set by the Indian bu
reau January 31, 1876. (The fact
that it was almost physically im
possible for the Sioux to obey this
order within the time allowed didn't
make any difference to the Indian
bureau!)
On February 1 the Indian com
missioner proclaimed all Sioux who
CALICO IN PERPETUITY ? An
Important provision of the treaty of
1794 whereby the United States ac
quired lands from the Iroquois Con
federacy was that there should be
an annual distribution of calico
am one 5,100 members of the Six
Nations. This provision is still car
ried out each year with appropriate
ceremonies in observance of perpet
ual "peace and friendship" with the
Iroquois. Shown here at a typical
ceremony is Florence Piintup, a
descendant of old Iroquois chiefs,
who received the rolls of calico for
distribution.
ncis uvv vu uic icbci vauwu uvir
tiles" and called on the army to
round them up. Then followed the
campaigns of Generals Crook, Ter
ry, Gibbon and Miles against these
"hostile" Sioux and Cheyennes in
1878-77 which either compelled the
surrender of the Indians or drove
them across the border into Canada.
Even before the campaign was over,
a commission was sent to treat with
the Sioux and arrange for the ces
sion of lands which the Fort Lara
mie treaty had guaranteed to them
"forever."
Concerning this commission, which
began its work in August, 1878,
Doane Robinson in his "History of
the Sioux Indians" (South Dakota
Historical Collections) writes:
The commission u;i "White the Indiana
received na aa friends and listened with kind
attention Is our proposition. we worn pain
fully Impressed with thatr teak ad son.
Odsnco In the ptedcoa of the fovornmoat
At Umos thoy told their story of wronfs
with such tmprcsstra ?i u?to? that oar
cboaks crtmaooad with thama Id thatr
?pssclm and racttala of aiwip which thatr
paopla had suffarad at tha hands ot tha
whites, tha arralfmnaDt for groas acts ai
inRustic* and fraud, tha ImifiHia oi
traatlas mada oaljr Id ba brckao. tha ds?Ms
tuC - .-a .ifltl. ..? L' m- ktflshh
and distrust* of our present profession si
friendship and good will, were portrayed la
colors so vivid and language so terse that
admiration and surprise would have kept us
silent had not shame and humiliation dene
so. That which made this arraignment
more telling was that it often came from
the lips of men who are our friends and who
had hoped against hope that the day might
come when their wrongs would be tedressed.
81 ou Had to Like It.
Since the Sioux didn't have much
choice in the matter, they signed the
treaty offered them. Here's what
another historian says about it (not
an Indian historian, but a white his
torian). George E. Hyde, author of
"Red Cloud's Folk?A History of the
Oglala Sioux Indiana," write#:
But the object had been attained at last,
and under the cloud of war the government
had taken the Black Hills, the Powder River
lands and the Bighorn country. The pre
tense of formal agreement and fair pay
ment which congress had devised to veil
this act of robbery did not even deceive the
Indians. The chiefs knew that thev were
being robbed and that they were (oread to
?ten away their landf. Bare are beat. Saw
and blanket* (aaid the United Stataa> tor
your landa In Laramie Platna and between
the torka of tha Platte, which we took from
you before IMS: and here (said the United
States) are the same beef, flour and blan
kets (or your lands In Nebraska which we
took before 1*10; and (aaid das United
States, with an air of vast generosity) here
are the same beef. Sour and blankets for
tha Black Hills, the Powder Blew, and the
Bighorn lands which we are now taking
from you. In all fairness, that la vary near
the true meaning of the "agreement" of
1070. by means of which these last landa
were taken from the Sioux.
So the Sioux were finally settled on
a greatly reduced reservation with
in the present states of North and
South Dakota. But even then the
Great White Father wasn't through
with them. In 1888 another com
mission went to the Standing Rock
reservation to swing the cession of
11 million acres of Sioux lands at a
fixed price of 50 cents an acre ("an
outrageous robbery,". Stanley Ves
tal, biographer of Sitting Bull, calls
it) and break up the great Sioux
reservation into smaller ones. Sit
ting Bull lined up the chiefs against
it, then went to Washington where he
succeeded in getting the price raised
to $1.25 an acre.
The next year another commission
came to Standing Rock to bargain
urith thp Sinn* At thn now nrinp hut
found themselves blocked at every
turn by Sitting Bull. Finally by
making various promises (many of
which were never kept, incident
ally) they managed to get enough
chiefs to agree to the sale. So, in
the words of Vestal, "the cession
was signed, the great Sioux Reser
vation was only a memory. It was
the death of a nation." Among the
promises that were not kept was one
about supplying rations to the Sioux,
penned up on their reduced reserva
tions, and In the winter of 1890-Sl -?
that broken promise bore bitter ??
fruit. For the Sioux, suffering from
hunger and disillusionment, became
easy victims to the apostles of the
Ghost Dance and before that excite
ment was over the shameful story
of the massacre at Wounded Knee
had been written on one of the
"black pages" which Secretary
Ickes mentions.
As indicated previously some of
the other "black pages" bear the
stories of our dealings with the Nex
Perces, the Modocs and the Poncas.
That is why it is likely that any
member of those tribes, as well as
the Sioux, who reads the secretary's
statement about "a fixed policy
based upon the principle of free
purchase and sale in dealings be
tween the native inhabitants of the
land and the white immigrants" wiH
probably smile?and there won't be
much humor in that smile I
Forty Tribes Celebrate
Festival at Galluo. N. M.
Indian drums are sounding in tha
far places of the Southwest, and the
Navajos, Zunis, Hopis, Utes, Apa
ches, Lagunas, Acomaa and a score
of other tribesmen and their fami
lies are trekking to "the place by
the bridge." Gallup, N. M.
Here each year 7,000 Indians from
nearly 40 different tribes Jain forces
to produce America's most colorful
and spectacular Indian show, ths an
nual Inter-Tribal Indian Ceremonial.
For four days they dance, chant,
compete in sports and engage in
weird pagan rites before capacity
audiences made up of their white
brothers. The Gallup Ceremonial is
the largest and most authentic In
dian spectacle of its kind in the
country. Usually the Ceremonial is
held the last part of August.
A special attraction each year is
the unusual display at Indian arts
and crafts in the Exhibit Hall where
thousands of articles are shown. A
score of native craftsmen will be
at work showing the technique of
Indian handicraft