Newspapers / Lenoir News-Topic (Lenoir, N.C.) / Oct. 14, 1891, edition 1 / Page 1
Part of Lenoir News-Topic (Lenoir, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
VOLUME XVII. HO FOR WESTERN North Carolina The Garden Spot of tie 'World. VMe$ of Products IT Surpasses all other Sec tions. Owing to its wonderful natural resources it was possible to establish here the most extensive Herbarium on the Globe, and with it side by tide has grown up the Largest WMesale EstaWislieiit IIT NOKTH CABOLINA. Siracgers bonder at its magni tude and are it a loss to understand how it has been accomplished; the explanation is easj : Fair Dealing, Economi cal Management! Minimum Profits -AND A LAfiGE VOLUME OP BUSINESS- Has been our aim4 '.and policy and has contributed chiefly, we believe, to the success we have thus far at tained, j It has become a well known fact 'andisttid to the avMolktofrpe pie thatnueretiaiBiiaurot every scription is sold cheaper in Western North Carolina than anywhere in the 8outh. New Yorkers frequent ly mj to us: 4Wby you folks sell fpodt cheaper than we "do1 here." This we are pleased to admit and it is not a revelation to many of our best merchants. Experienced bus iness men are alive to the fact that the Retail Merchant can buy to bet ter advantage in Baltimoretban in' New York, in Richmond than in Baltimore and in 8tatesville better till than in Richmond. 'Br Making Large Pufciases We are enabled to secure the low t quantity price, while our Expenses are Inftigrniflcant As compared with houses in the large cities. 0or object, however; in thir ad- & Tertisement was more par- , ticularly to call atten- . tion to a r - fow aii Eanlsome Line of Gccls, - BOUGHT- 1 v ' EeciaHy Tor tbe MlM:'Sm Br Counters are Loaded 'frith Sea Me goods and tberVare Bargains in Every Department. Stock is complete and there will te o deity in makixiiiaipmenti. Very Respectfully, . POLK AND BALL. SP1W COBBESPOXDEKCE BETWEEN THEII. Polk Till Bill to Resign Froa the Ugis ; latin Connitteji. r FolIoWing is the' correspondence between President Polk, of the na- mn a,ld "President HaU, of the Missouri State Alliance, UgardiD the latter,fi opposition to tne sub-Treasury : POLK's LETTER TO HAIA. Washington, D. C, June 21, '91. Mr. U. S. Hall, President of the Missouri State Alliance, Hub- bard, mo. : Dear Sir and Brother. It is my painful duty as president of the a . L and as chairman ol the national legislative commit tee, to direct your attention to cer tain matters which have come to my knowledge through letters from brethren in your own and other States, through resolutions adopted by Alliances in your own and other States, and through the public press. If the alleged representations of your utterances in public speeches on certain Alliance measures be true, it is made my duty under the law, as chairman of the national legislative committee, and of which you are a member, to say to you frankly that such positions are inconsistent with and antagonistic to the duties im posed upon that committee under the law. - A report of a speech purporting to have been made recently by you in Saline county appears in the col umns of the Alliance Watchman of April 2d a paper published in Mar shall, Missouri. In this report oc curs these words : ul am unalterably and for all time opposed to the sub-Treasury bill, and I intend to fight it to the bitter end, all the more as president of the State Alliance,: because it will give my words against it more weight. I am its bftter and uncompromising enemy," etc, etc. If the above is substantially cor rect, and if this language expresses substantially your position and yiews, I beg to call your attention, as a member of the national legisla tive committee, to paragraph 2, sec tion 29, statutory laws, defining in part the duties of the national leg islative council : "That it shall be the duty of the national legislative council to formulate measures and devise such necessary methods in conformity to the principles, purpo ses and acts of the supreme council, a may secure the enactment of such laws as may be indicated by the su preme council." To this end and in further pursuance of the law (see paragraph o, section 29) the nation al legislative council appointed a national legislative committee, of which you were made a member, "to give such personal advice as may, in the judgment of the council, be necessary to a proper presentation of the measures before Congress." I beg to call your attention to sec tion 32 of our statutory laws, which ays . "All measures presented for con sideration may be discussed fairly, fully, honestly and thoroughly, and when the action of a majority has been had,, all who participated in the meetingare pledged to support such action. It is the duty of every member where the body has spoken to stand as a unit before the world." . Now, as to the position of the Al liance on the sub-Treasury bill, which it is alleged you are publicly antagonizing. After a free and un trammelled discussion at our St. Louis meeting it was adopted with great unanimity. After being ex tensively discussed for a year and with great interest throughout the country it was again indorsed at our Ocala meeting by a rising vote of the body only four voting againsr it by the adoption of the following resolutions : , ttVJ-nvMv.k ' There is now a bilJ, known as the sub-Treasury bill, m the hands of the ways and means committee of the House of Repre sentatives, which should have been reported and acted upon at the last session, and which, if enacted into law, would bring the financial lehef so much needed by all classes and industries ; -therefore be it fResolved, That the national con vention of the Farmers' Alliance and Industrial Union -de . most re spectfully and earnestly ask that said vm u- -,torl into law as soon as Dill' l" BUWV" - possible-or some other measure that 7T. . these 4 principles and meet the"7 necessities of the toiling m Th?adoption of this preamble and resolution constitutes it one w f facts xf itbe supreme , council, ana pJoclaims it one of its "P?? fnTwhich m paragraph 2, Beckon 29. it i wade the duty ox tne ,eg lative council to urge upon Congress, lative cuum, o f those "meas- tWUng of tb. gjg were made member of the national 5wftEir...fcft. it adopted be sen w v aorricnl- ratatas Senate cobu"" ' Tnr reciting the faet that the bill ircbarge of said committee and was in cnargo v A months : naa oeeu r1T - 1 - en lor j ? n. r zlnnii LENOIR; N. O. meeting ; that, the Ocala meeting reiterated its demands for some such relief measure as this, and constitu4 te-i this legislative committee to look after these legislative demands, and bu national legislative council de- manoea that the measure ahonld be reported either favorably or unfa vorably that it might be considered on its merits. The merits or demerits of this measure or our individual oninmna thereon as members of this national legislative committee are matters entirely foreign to the object and purpose of this communication and can have no bearing on it. The question for you, aa one of the na tional legislative committee, and for myself, as chairman of thatbodv and as president of the N. b A. & I. U. is . What is the will of the national Alliance, as expressed in its action, and what is our dutyhaving volun tarily entered into a solemn compact with the Alliance to carry out that expressed will by accepting appoint ments ior tnat purpose r as to what the functioas and du ties of the national legislative corn tee are, under the acts of the na tional legislative council and under the resolutions and laws of the su preme council, admits of no ques tion, in my judgment. Indeed, so- clear is it, that had I entertained the remotest doubt as to my difty as a member of the committee, to ob serve in strictest faith the evident and expressed will of the Alliance and of the council, I should most assuredly have declined the appoint ment promptly, loir will doubtless remember that when the committee was appointed, its duty in this re gard was discussed by members of the council, and Brother J. H. Mc Dowell was especially emphatic in his construction, insisting that whatever might be the views of the individual members of the commit tee on any measure embraced within the province of its official charge, it was the plain duty of the committee to carry out the will of the Alliance and of the council. We all accepted the appointment without one word of dissent to those views. Now, to the point : If I felt that I could not conscientiously acquiesce in the will of the order, and that I, aa an honest, patriotic citizen, was impelled by a sense of duty to op pose measures and antagonize the will of the order publicly, and es pecially on such measures that I had been instructed to advocate or pro mote, I should not hesitate a single moment as to my course I would promptly resign my place on the committee. I know yon arefully prepared to hear this from me, as it is but a rep ' etition of my position on this ques tion which was given to you when in wa8mngon, in response ro your inquiry as to my views as to your duty as president of the Alliance in Missouri, m view of your opposition to the sub-Treasury bill. I think I understand your position thoroughly as to this particular measure. I cannot believe that you would willingly damage the Alliance cause, I cannot believe that yon de sire to be or appear to be inconsist ent, ana I therefore say to you, in the utmost frankness and in a spirit of true fraternity, that you owe it to yourself, to the cause, to sever your official relations with the pa- tional legislative committee oy ten dering your resignation as a member of the same. Fraternally yours, (Signed) L. L. Folk, President of the N. F. A. I. U. HALls.LETTEB TO POLK. Farmers & Laborers' Union of Missouri. U. S Hall, President. Hubbard, Mo., June 27, 1891. To Mr. L. L. Polk, President of the National Farmers' Alliance and Industrial Union, Washington, D. C. : Dear Sir and Brother : Re plying to your communication of the 21 at in which vou ask me to with draw mv oDnosition to the eub- Treasury bill or tender my resigna tion as a membei of the national legislative committee, I have, the following to say : I was uncompromisingly opposed to this measure before, at the1 time of and since my election as a mem ber of the national, legislative com mittee, and no one in 'cur order knew bettor than yourself of my pronounced opposition to it. You will remember the conversation be tween you and myself, in the pres ence of another gentleman, in your office in Washington the day before the February meeting of the nation al lowialat.irft council. In that' con versation T told you what you then irnAor T had heen an onen and avowed enemy of the sub-Treasury bill ever since its presentation to our Ai.W in December. 1887. at St. Louis, and told you that I recogniz d in 'this bill and in the-conrse airAn hv its author. 0. W. Macune. through ihe National Economist, an attempt to sell out the organization tn the nrotective tariff men of the -East ; :t hat-- MacnnBarrtising-- the official organ, i the National Econo mist, and editoiially declaring that nothincr in t rift, tariff Vltvtv o ' " m question j"1 that it was Va-breeder of actional strife.' and that 'the aei- 1-f.iftn of the tariff ouestion waa an effort on the part of the Democratic party to galvanize the old ' ghost of hatred." T further told , WEDNESDAY. OCTOBER 14, 1891... you that Macune's object in pushing the1 Bab-Treasury bill was to turn, the minds of the farmers away from the tariff issue and Jcbmrnft them to class legi8latioii;k the very thing the protective barons of the East most wanted, and you will also remember that you expressed your opposition to it and used this expression : "If I were drawing the financial plank of any political party that I wanted to stand on, it would be but in one sentence, and would read, 'We de mand the free and unlimited coinage of silver. " This ' was during the same conversation in 'which I asked you if yon would accept a nomina tion at the hands of a third "party for President or Vice President of the United States in '92, and you said you would not answer my ques tion. There was not, a member of that legislative council but who knew that I was unalterably opposed to the sub-Treasury bill, and knew this before T was elected on the leg islative committee, I having an nounced to them on all occasions, both in public conversation and in private, and by writing, through the newspapers, my opinion upon that question. I vam in hearty accord with all the other demands of our order, except that part of the finan cial plank which makes the govern ment a money loaner to the farmer. Despite these facts 1 waa elected a member of this national , legislative committee, and I see no reason for my tendering my resignation as such a member. 1 am a farmer with every cent I have invested in farm ing and with no other means of rey enue, and feel that I have a personal as well as1 a fraternal interest in the success of the farming class. You certainly cannot have forgotten that as soon as 1 was elected on -the com mittee, and 'during the session of the national legislative council' that elected me, you got on the floor and said that the wisest, noblest and bravest thing that'the legislative council had ever done: was their electing me on that Committee, that bad the courage to stand up and denounce a corrupt and guilty man, meaning Macune, when 1 knew that he was corrupt, in spite of the hisses and jeers of other men, and that I was the only one of the committee that refused to whitewash him. You spoke at-great length in that com plimentary strain, you knowing full well that I would not v support the sub-Treasury bill or any other bill that I thought would ruin 'the-' far mers of this country and draw their minds from our, greatest curse, the protective tariff. You seem tothink, however, that I am bound to advo cate that measure because of certain expressions. used by .7. H. McDowell, who was a co-ordinate member of the legislative council withr myself and tho other State presidents. Might I not with as much reason say that the other members of the com mittee were instructed and obligated to oppose the sub-Treasury measure from my remarks made at the same time that it would rum the farmers of the country if passed. Of course, thorexore, mere can oe notning binding in any remarks made by Mr. McDowell, or any one else, m'diS- cussing measures oi tnat mna or character in a committee loom. The other point upon which you rely in saying that 1 am bound to support that measure in the capacity of com mitteeman is that I- was .instructed by what yon are pleased to call 'cer tain statutory laws and resolutions passed at Ocala. I will now examine this position of yours ' You and :I and hundreds of other Alliancemeu in the Uttfted 'States' traveled" over our entiie'country with the consti- tution and ritual of our 'order, ' and' induced several million farmers to join thi organization. To7all appli cants for membership we read sec tion 1 of the preamble or declaration of principles of our'tiational,' State, countv and subordinate - Alliance 'constitution, (this declaration being. alike in all which reads : "The object of - this order-is to labor for the 'education of- the agricultural classes in the scietice' of lec6tiomical government itfa" strictly non partisan spirit and to bring4 "about more perfect union of said classes." Also, , that in section 1, article by of our national constitution, all of the qual ifications that are necessary to be come a member and ctiriBeauentlv an .Oiuuojr ui yur uiucr, nto iuuj ecu Jouti which reada as follows : "Section l.'TSo person shall be admitted as a member of this order except a1 white personsOver ' "sixteen years of age, who is a believer 1n the existence of a Supreme' Being," and has resided in ' the "State; for;; more than six months, and is 'either, first, a farmer or a far nl laborer ( Second, a mechanic, a country, preacner, a countrv school tedcher or a ' country doctor ; third an editor of a'strictly airridnltnraT oaiwr .""Yon will ifnr- ther remember , that 'whetf4 we were inatracting the'candid&tesj fifths or der;" and before we aBked'tUem to take" npotT themselves the Obligation of the oreaiiizatlont wewere reoulr ed by "our law ttf miktf'tbefoilow- mg v statement ttr tnem : " I on are assured thatnbthiiiff titthW idroW tion inalt rhMhtr ;ayrco1iflicta with yoiit MfetQtiSOi ; pottticalniws." I onote this section r Xtttartnerpream- hie bf bnr ubnktitntlodf dr.ihe nnr pose oftljpwingthat bnr3ibfder sis not ana can neTencome, nnaer our constitution, .a; partisan political body; " and 'tliktirhBTleyer 4 any one, from personal amDUion; or any otn er motives, tries to make a political party on t of our order he subverts our constitution and gives the false' 'hood to the solemn declaration made by our organizers to the millions of members who took the solemn fra ternal obligation of our order. I quote the clause of eligibility for membership for the purposo of showing that 9 no one is debarred from becoming a member or officer of our order for opinion's sae. All that waa necessary to join the Alli ance was that the applicant be over sixteen years of age, a white person, believing in a Supreme Being and was a farmer, farm laborer, etc. Do we find in that constitution any clause that says if a man does not believe in the sub-Treasury scheme he shall not be eligible either as a member or an officer of our order ? Not one word of it, and why ? Be cause this order in its infancy and purity, before it was used as it now is, by designing politicians and corrupt men, to subservr their ambitious and mercenary ends, was for the purpose as set forth in the constitution above quoted, to bring about a more per fect union of said farming classes, and no unan was debarred from membership or from holding office in our order on account of any op inion that he might hold upon any political question, which means questions pertaining to National and State legislation. This is the dividing line, and the only one of moment between partisan and non partisan bodies. ' If a man, is a Re publican he will not be permitted to take the stump and denounce the system of the high protective tariff without being read out of his party; if a Democrat he will not be allowed to denounce a reduction of the pro tective tariff without being sub ject to like treatment. Then -can any sane man claim that freedom of speech and thought can be dispen sed with in a strictly - non-partisan order, organized for the purpose of uniting the farmers, who have here tofore been divided in opinion, without losing its non-partisan and liberal character ? Our order rec ognized that the great cause of the depressed condition of the farming class is ' that heretofore (while our interests have ever been the same,) we have been divided in the exercise of voting . right. You how cliam that while those solemn constitu tional provisions above quoted are still in force," that the National Al liance can, by statutory enactment, as you are pleased to term it pas sed at Ocala last December declare that a member or an officer has no right to differ from the conclusion reached by a majority of the dele- f;ates in the National Alliance meet ng. Do yon think it -this clause had been in our constitution when we organized our order that we could have secured one-tenth of the membership we have now? You seem tb lay stress upon the fact of my pub licly opposing the sub-Treasury bill. xii mis sua-xreasurv scneme is iznt. the more fully, publicly and oftener it ia discussed, the sooner it will be enacted into a law. If it is wrong, a full and free discussion will bring out its fallacies only the sooner and thereby enable, us to cease advocating a wrong measure. I will never concur in your opinion that any public or general law should be enacted, or the poople brpught to adyocate it, by dark lan tern caucuses and discussions in se cret societies composed of but one class of people. This I conceive to be in direct violation of the spirit of our government. Your desire to see men ostracised for opinion's sake, and to gag free discussion will not meet the approval of the peoplo who love freedom of speech and the freest public discussions of puplic questions. I now desire to let the order know how "fairly, fully, hon estly and thoroughly the sub-Treaa-ury bill was discussed at Ocala. The members of that National Alliance were limited to one speech .of fire minutes each in discussing the sub Treasury bill one speech of five minutes to discuss a measure which, if enacted into law, would change the whole financial system of our government since its foundation, and I claim bankrupt and destroy it. I make this statement to the end that I hope my Alliance brother farmers of the United States may know that the sub Treasury bill was fastened upon this organization at Ocala by a gag law being applied to prevent its heresies being exposed. You say in your letter that I am fully prepared to hear- this request for -my resignation front; yon. In this you are entirely in error," for the " following reasons : First, you knew mv public', open' and- avowed hostility to this bill from the time of its' first inception - up to the time I was elected on that committee ; sec ondly, 'Ottaaaccounr of the cordial manner in which you commend the bodv for electinz me to that posi tion : third, another reason why I am surprised at your making such a request is the following one of the ' demands of lthe; National- Alliance 1 adapted at'onr St. :H Lduir'.'meeting, in 'DetoberlSSg il "Believing in the doctrine of etinai riehts : to all r anoineciar 1 ators to "none; - we de I k hi. i - a ' 'JA'.- ' CVi . A mand tnat legislation ."tenner onaie s or'NatiOnalj Shall Wwed: to J build tnwne;industrr at 'the ' expense or. 1 another." and if this eans any tbinfic itJ'was intendedcas a'direct "thrust at tne prresent jmueciive tar iff Bystem ; and Mr.' 0.W: r Macune, who was then chairman of the very committee von and I are now on the national ' legislative committee, came out in his official capacity and denounced the tariff issue as 9 being "a hoarv breeder of sectional strife. and that tbe aaritation of ' the tariff Question was "a tariff doer fight in which the farmers felt no interest," and in almost every issue of the na tional official organ ' the farmers were warned to pay no heed or at tention to the tariff question what- r ever ; and when I again- drew the tariff plank of our national demands at Ocala we used the following lan guage : "We demand the removal of the present heavy tariff tax from the necessaries of life that the poof of our landjmust have' and deman ding further "that the national government should cease to build up one industry by impoverishing the others," and yet since tbe adop tion of that plank in our national demands, which is equally promi nent with the sub-Treasury de mands, this same man Macune, holding the two most powerful and important offices in the gift of our order, still continues to denounce the tariff question and say there is nothing in it. Why was it that you did not make it, to quote your own language, your "painful duty as President of the F. N. A. & I. U. to direct his attention to these mat ters which came to your constant knowledge." The answer is plain and on the surface : You - feared Macune while he was holding, as he still holds, the position of editor of the national official organ and chair man of the national Executive com mittee, and Macune had his own reasons for sneering at the tariff de mand of our order, which reasons are best known to him and his pro tective baron friends. Thereason why Macune makes the sub-Treasury demand the most important one of our order is because it is the only demand upon which he can hope to form a Third party out of the farm ing class knowing that the existing political parties or at least one of them will come to the reasonable demands of the farmers or that we can force them to come there by united action on our part, and that no political party of any prominence would make the sub-Treasury bill a principle of its platform. This is a most important point that should be considered by the farmers of thd United States. This order was cre ated to bring about unity of ' action among the farmers who were divi ded so hopelessly by the late war, but you men in pushing this sub Treasury scheme are dividing us more widely and hopelessly than the war ever did. The ambition of many of us was to build up this order as a great nou-partisau balance wheel, to the end that the great conservative, agricultural classes of our country could hold in check tbe corruption of partisan politics, but yon men are tearing it down, decimating our ranks, and bringing the order into disrespect and disrepute in the esti mation of all good, patriotic citizen, and only bringing to our aid those men who desire to take office at any sacrifice of patriotic principles. I feel that it is my duty to write you thus plainly, hoping that you may yet see where you are drifting the order, and hoping that you may yet retain enough regard for the poor and oppressed of our land to aid us in calling our brother farmers out of the swamps of class legislation, pa ternalism and socialism, whither Macune and his henchmen have been sending them in search of that jack o'lantern class legislation pa ternalism, known as the sub-Treasury hill. I desire to say that I have for you personally a most kindly f celling and that our relations have ever been of a pleasant character up to this affair, and that I belive you to be an hon est man, who would have never been led into these extravagancies except through a pressure that was hard for any man to resist. I take pleasure in bearing witness to the further facts that you have entertained and ex pressed to me the same opinion of C. VV. Macune' and his dishonesty and corruption that I have had, : saying, aa you have often done, that you had no confidence in the man and would Jiold ho communication with him ex cept of an official character, and that communication to be in writing. As I was placed upon this committee by the national legislative council, and as I feel that it is my duty to guard, as far as it lies in my power, the rightB and the interests of the farmers in this country, and that I have noright to consult my own personal feelings and recognizing that you have no right to demand my resignation aa a menjer of that committee, I refuse to tender it. 'Were I to consult my own personal 1 feelings I would ne7er have accepted a position upon that' committe, and would now most gladly sever my con nection with iW The salary of 12,000 would be no inducement or have no weight with me ' in' the .premises, and while I suppose from what I have ? learned through others that rthe national Executive committee, of which 0. W. Macune is chairman, "will rembve'me from the position I nowiiold,' yet I feel that it is; my duty -Ad allow them to act instead of 'aiding them and their scheme by acting myself in tendering my resig nation. Very fraternally, ; . U. S. HaCl, Pres. Farmers' and Laborers' of Mo. ; T. H. DEAL. i KTJDIAX. Lenoir. N. 0. Cedar Valley, N. C. Deal-Oml lenoiiyH; C. NEW-G00DS.: The best line of dyw3 it,. ever carried. We have come to stay, and we want our customers to know that the v don buy their goods from us, for in: this we are in accord -with tha All live and let live. ' We have over ftl.onn fnvAf - clothing and will sell you a -pair of Wo, 1 00, 1 25, 2 oo and np to s oo eacb.raltA that are worth s 00, we knor.k Anm ta u have suits worth 6 60, 8 Ob; 1000, i 00. SO 00. when you want clothing- on,t forget that we will sell them to you for least bought. Calicoes 4c, 6c, 6c. 7c. nev v'a. Wan. ted 10c, to 12 1-2c, cashmers 20j, S5c. Flannel dress roods Mc, to 85c ter Ji" i .o 18c, Mc, 85c, SOc, 85c, 40c, per yd. r This la & complete line of cotton and woolen gocds buy 'em. Shoes, we hire ln wh.t A want, ladles fine shoes 100, 1 35, l so, 100, a 60, 8 W, pair, heavy shoes 1 00, pair, meni shoes congress or lace 1 25, l 60, 2 00, BOOhand sew ed shoe 4 00, pair, brogans 1 00, 1 S5, 1 60, buy 'em. Hats for everybody 25c, up to 1 00, don t think of going bearheaed when you can buy hats so cheap. All kinds of Wftti.nii Qn.;.i of goods that Jerry Simpson don't We have a few Plowa fnr i.h Iao.l money anywhere. We keen on hanH Af. all - . ' MA UUIOO baeon, flour, lard, enffe mnr canvassed hamsanything you want iu ub grocery line. We Want vour nrnA highest market price, hut will rio you special prices for cash. Thanking our patrons for past favors, and will merits continuance of same by giving you bargains, We are your friends, Deal & Deal. DAVENPORT FEMAlE COLLEGE L.enoir, N. C. Fall term begins Sept. 10th. Best Climate Easy of Access. Moral and Refining Influence. Home Comforts. Scholarly Faculty, Thorough In struction, Practical courses of study, Special advantages in Music, Art, Elocution, &c. Bdg'"Superior' opportunities for those preparing to teach. Expenses moderate LFree Schol arships. Send for Catalogue. John D. Mimck, A. M Pres. ' B. 1 N E W L A li i'V The Emigrants Faiehd Goinfir West or North west Take the Chicago & Alton ?. . Parties contemplating going West will savetinre and money going via the Alton route. It ia' the only line" running solid vestibuled trains ' be tween St. Louis and Kansas City makes direct connection lot all points in Kansas, Nebraska, Color-' ado,' California Oregon, Washing ton end Beclining chair-cars and 'Tourist Sleepers free of extra charge. For low rates and full information maps and diaeution paphlets of ; ibm West apply to - J. CHABLT02T, G. P. A. Chicago, J1L, . B. A." Kevtlaxd. Tran Pass Agent, AsheviUe, N. O t that it was aaop In
Lenoir News-Topic (Lenoir, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Oct. 14, 1891, edition 1
1
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75