Africo-Americ “AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE.”—John viii, 32. CHARLOTTE, N. C., THURSDAY, AUGUST 6, 1925. NO. 32. ■m m VOL. XLVII. TOWARD INTER RACIAL UNDERSTANDING By W. W. Alexander Secretary, Commission on Inter-racial Cooperation, Federal Council of Churches. American race questions are but part of a race problem which exists around the world. In Egypt, South Africa, India and the Pacific are racial situations in many respects almost identi cal with those in the United States, and usually more acute. The race problem in America would of itself be of little signif icance. But as an important segment of a circle of suspicion and misunderstanding that reaches around the globe, includ ing unnumbered millions of many races and climes, it is of great significance. Among the groups recently brought into the closet of con tacts, ‘‘tinted races” comprise by far the larger number; but for some time past the untinted mi nority have enjoyed by far the larger measure of control over the affairs of the world. Unfor tunately, this privileged minori ty has not always exercised its power in such a way as to in spire the confidence of its sub jects. Indeed, the exercise of power rarely ever does result in confidence. Its very possession inspires suspicion, for which his tory has furnished ample and plausible grounds. Exploitation vs. Cooperation. In the past, human contacts were dominated by the philoso phy of exploitation. In theory, at least, this philosophy has been abandoned. The passing of slavery would seem to indicate that the improvement is real. However, the psychology result ^in^F^Tiofh groups aiid vastly complicates race relations today. On the one side is con tempt and condescension for those formerly held in servi tude; on the other side there is resentment and suspicion. One of the leading dailies of America has recently given re peated expression to the senti ment that the white race must dominate the other peoples of the world and that some sort of cooperation among white na tions must be brought about at once, particularly in the interest of controlling the Pacific. The editor tells us that the people of the East must be kept “un der.” An eminent American col lege professor recently brought out a volume in which he seeks to establish the following thesis: Civilization in the past was based upon the economic exploi tation of one class by another within the same racial groups; exploitation within the white group must stop; it must pre pare at once for a campaign of exploitation among the other races of the world. This senti ment has found cruder and more popular expression in the Ku Klux Klan. The religion of Jesus is the only influence either willing or able to challenge this philosophy of dominance and psychology of exploitation. The future of civ ilization is not in the hands of any one race. It is rather the task of men of goodwill from among many races. Right methods of racial adjustment can be discovered only by a dem ocratic process, and men of oth er races have as definite a con tribution to make to the discov ery as those of the white race. In every race there are men of the Christian spirit who know that special privilege is a men ace to individual and social pro gress, and who are willing to forego it and join like-minded men from other groups in the search for inter-racial justice through service and helpful ness. Racial adjustment is rendered imore difficult by lack of any comprehensive body of trust worthy facts regarding race. These facts are not easily gath ered no rreadily interpreted. Long periods are required to de I termine the meaning of tenden cies among racial groups. The technique for studying racial differences is as yet crude and elementary. Moreover, feeling plays so large a part in racial attitudes that it is different for men to be rational. Feelings easily crystallize into dogma. In America today, for example, dogmatic statements about rela tive racial capacity are being an nounced, founded so far not on scientific research, but on bare, unsupported assumptions. The Promise of the Negro. It should not be supposed, however, that prejudice and an tagonism constitute the univer sal American attitude toward the Negro. Thoughtful Amer icans, North and South, do not share these sentiments. In America’s experience with Ne groes they see nothing to justi fy hysteria or pessimism as to the ultimate outcome. On the contrary, they see much to en courage the hope that racial dif ferences will yet be found not a menace to civilization, but a means for its enrichment, not a cause of war, but an opportu nity for fellowship in the com mon tasks of human welfare. The educational processes have not been in operation long enough or with sufficient thor oughness to indicate finally what special capacities American Ne groes may possess. They have, however, shown an inclination to the arts that has already en riched our national life. This h