Don’t Go
WRONG
This Year
sssqssmsseh
Save money on
your transporta
tion needs. Visit
our used cap* de
partment and
get the
LOWEST
PRICES
ever offered on
used cars in Sal
isbury.
xmmmm
1931 Ford Delux Tudor
$325
1930 Ford Tudor
$295
1929 Ford Roadster
$100
1930 Ford Coupe
$225
1929 Ford Touring
$100
1929 Chevrolet Coupe
$175
70 Chrysler Roadster
$150
70 Chrysler Sedan
$135
70 Chrysler Coupe
$125
| 1931 Plymouth Sedan
j $195
I
Dodge Sedan
$25
Chrysler Roadster
$35
Every Car is in
A -1 condition
and priced to
meet your ap
proval.
Hedrick
Auto
Company
Your Ford Dealer
The New Ford
V-8 Is Now On
Display Here
The first of the new Ford V-8
cylinder, 112-inch wheelbase mot
or cars will be displayed here Sat
urday, February 11, 1933 in the
showrooms of the Hedrick Auto
Company, Ford dealers, at 120
West Innes Street, it was announc
ed today. The showrooms will be
opened at 8 o’clock.
Because of the unusual public
interest in the new Ford cars
crowds are expected to attend.
The showrooms have been decorat
ed for the occasion. Attendants
will be on hand to explain the
many important features of the
new cars.
The New V-8 is the largest and
most powerful Ford ever built. It
has new and distinctively modern
ines, a most attractive front end,
longer wheelbase, larger and room
ier bodies, faster acceleration, in
creased power and speed and is ex
ceptionally economical in opera
tion. With its 75-horsepower, V-8
engine, the New Ford is capable
of a sustained speed of 80 miles
i_
The styling of the 14 body ty
pes expresses the new mode in
motor car building. The modern
note is found in the sloping Vee
radiator grill, the skirted fenders,
newly designed headlamps, cowl
lamps and bumpers, the curve of
the hoodside ventilators, the 20
degree slant of the windshield, the
curved roof header, the reverse
curve of the rear quarter and the
backward sweep of the apron
masking the gasoline tank.
The all-steel bodies are material-j
ly wider, almost a foot longer andj
consequently much roomier. The
attractive instrument panel is dir
ectly in front of the instrument
board. Front seats in closed cars
are fully adjustable. Interior fit
tings are luxurious. Options in
upholstery and a wide choice of
body colors are available.
The improved V-8 engine is fit
ted with all-aluminum cylinder
beads, one of the most noteworthy
forward steps in motor design in
many years. Because aluminum
dissipates heat more rapidly, the
use of the aluminum cylinder heads
permits higher compression pres
sure and results in increased speed,
power and smoothness, faster ac
celeration and added fuel econo
my.
Smooth engine performance re
ults also from the basic 8-cylinder
design and the 3-point rubber
mounting cylinder blocks are set
it a 90-degree angle. The crank
shaft is fully counterbalanced and
the crank throws are at 90 degrees.
Opposing pistons and connecting
rods are even in weight. All of
these features combine to place all
moving parts in natural balance,
resulting in exceptional smooth
ness of operation. The engine is I
fitted with down-draft carburetor
air-intake silence and a diaphragm
type fuel pump.
Features of the 112-inch wheel
base chassis include an extremely
rigid double-channel, double drop
X-type frame, torque tube drive,
a straddle mounted rear axle pin
ion, transverse cantilever springs,
internal expanding mechanical
four wheel brake, 17-inch welded
steel spoke wheels and tires of 5.SO
Inches section.
In the new three-quarter floating
rear axle the driving pinion is
mounted in a double taper roller
thrust bearing at the front and a
straight radial roller bearing at
the rear. This maintains perman
ent alignment of the pinion with
the ring gear under all driving
conditions and results in extremely
quiet axle operation.
The frame is cushioned by ' ur
Houdaille double-acting shock
absorbers which are both automa
tically and thermostatically ad
justed for every variation in
weather or road surface conditions.
Hie shock absorber links are in
sulated in rubber. The rear fuel
‘ank has a capacity of 14 gallons.
The transmission is of the syn
chronized type, with helical cons
tant mesh gears, and functions un
usually quietly both in second
speed and during speed changing.
The clutch is of the double-disc
“voe and is spring cushioned for
soft engagement
T,EFT ARM BEATS RIGHT
Brownsville. Tex.—The left arm
moved mightier than the right
irm in the golf swing. The verdict
was reached in a match between
two one-armed golfers. John Hern
don of Mercedes, who has only a
left wing and swings back-handed
defeated C. E. Henderson of Harl
I tngen, who has a right arm and no
! left. .
ROWAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CALENDAR
FEBRUARY TERM, 1933
HON. WILSON WARLICK, Judge Presiding.
FOR THE TRIAL OF CRIMINAL CASES.
Witnesses and parties to suits are urged to be on hand promptly at the call of their cases. State’s witnesses are required to appear before the Grand Jury on Monday, the
first day of the term unless they have previously appeared before the Grand Jury. After appearing before the Grand Jury, they are required to be in Court on the day
set for the trial of their respective cases. The Solicitor will be in his office each morning at nine o’clock for the purpose of conferring with State’s witnesses in cases set
for that particular day. Witnesses are not allowed to prove in more than one case on ■any one day. The State does not pay defendant’s witnesses. -
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1933:
1— State vs Carl G. Smith—Abandonment—Open for compliance
2— State vs James A. Weant—Abandonment—Defendant not taken
3— State vs James Simon—Vio. Pro. Law—Open to pay costs
4— State vs Mrs. W. D. Rash—Vio. Pro. Law—Open for judgment
6— State vs C. C. Cone—Worthless check—Open to pay costs
7— State vs Albert Tinsley—B & E—Open to pay costs
8— State vs Brunell Whirlow—Vio. Pro. Law—Open to pay fine and costs
9— State vs C. C. Buff—Vio. Pro. Law—Open to pay fine and costs
10— State vs Frank Webb—Vio. Pro. Law—Open to pay fine and costs
14— State vs Mrs. M. M. Everhart—Nuisance—Open for judgment
15— State vs James B. Little—D. W. D.—Not taken
16— State vs Harve Karriker—L & R—Open to pay fine and costs
17— State Vs Olin Everhart—Seduction—Open to show compliance
18— State vs Earl Norton—Seduction—not taken /
2 3—State vs Brooks Carl C. Craige—D. W. D.—Open to pay fine and costs
24— State vs M. B. Harrellson—Embezzlement—Continued for bill
27— State vs Arthur Stirewalt—Non Support—Open to show compliance
28— State vs John Doe, alias Sam Murphy—Vio. Pro. Law—Deft, not taken
29— State vs Cal Deal—L & R—Open for judgment
30— State vs Cal Deal and Ray Roseman—L & R—Open for judgment
3 5—State vs L. M. Swanson—Worthless check—Open to show compliance
37—State vs R. L. Foster—Forgery—Deft, not taken
39—State vs Will Ellis—A. W. D. W.—Open to show compliance
42—State vs Othel Shoaf—V. M. V. L.—Open to show compliance
45—State vs Floyd Owens—Seduction—Open for judgment
54—State vs Theo Herrington—Robbery—Open to show compliance
5 5—State vs George Earnshaw—B & E—Deft, not taken >
5— State vs Clyde Rash, alias Chub Rash, and Mrs. W. D. Rash—Vio. Pro.
Law—For Trial
11— State vs Floyd Dwiggins—Assault on female—-For trial
12— State vs Floyd Dwiggins—Non support—For trial
13— State vs Floyd Dwiggins—Abandonment—For trial
19— State vs T. F. Michael—Worthless check—For trial
20— State vs T. F. Michael—Worthless check—For trial
21— State vs T. F. Michael—Worthless check—For trial
22— State vs T. F. Michael—Worthless check—For trial
25— State vs Robert Lineberger—False pretense—For trial
26— State vs Myrl Pethel—B & E—L & R—For trial
31— State vs Frank Bacon—Abandonment and non support—For trial
32— State vs Winola Clemmons—A. W. D. W.—For trial
33— State vs Zeb Robbins—Rape—For trial
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1933:
66— State vs Buss Gilliam, Bubber Barrett, Bubber Gooding, and James
McIntyre—Highway Robbery; mjail—For trial
67— State vs Theo Jackson—B & E—L & R; in jail—For trial
68— State vs Ray Clampet—B & E—L & R; in jail—For trial
69— State vs John Henry Hunt—B & E; in jail—For trial
70— State vs Charles Barton—A. W. D. W.; on roads—For trial
71— State vs David Overcash—Aiding and Abetting; in jail—For trial
72— State vs J. D. Hegler—A. W. D. W. with intent to kill; in jail—For trial
73— State vs Kenneth Ballard—Highway Robbery; in jail—For trial
74— State vs Lura Cartrett—Carnal Knowledge; in jail—For trial
75— State vs fm, Ramsey—L & R; in jail—For trial
76— State vs Lilly Hill—A. W. D. W. with intent to kill; in jail—For trial
94—State vs James Manass—Bigamy; in jail—For trial
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1933:
34—State vs D. B. Leonard and W. L. Leonard—Vio. Game Laws—For trial
36—State vs Lawrence Honeycutt and Ray Snider—B & E—For trial
3 8—State vs Joe Honey—Vio. Pure Food Laws—For trial
40— State vs Brantley Earnhardt—Reckless Driving—For trial
41— State vs Brantley Earnhardt—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
43— State vs John I. Trexler—Non support—For trial
44— State vs John I. Trexler—Assault on female—For trial
46— State vs L. P. Thompson—Reckless Driving—For trial
47— State vs Green Honeycutt—Abondonment—For trial
48— State vs Wid Leonard—C. C. W.—For trial
49— State vs Cal Snider—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
5 0—State vs Cal Snider—Vio. Pro. Law—F(jr trial
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1933:
51— State vs Newt Holland and Joe Hare—A. W. D. W.—For trial
52— State vs Newt Holland and Joe Hare—A. W. D. W.—For trial
53— State vs Newt Holland and Joe Hare—A. W. D. W.—For trial
56— State vs Copt Crawford—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
57— State vs Lloyd Roseman—Larceny—For trial
5 8—State vs Ray Roseman—Larceny—For trial
59— State vs Calvin Deal—Larceny—For trial
60— State vs Carl Roseman—L & R—For trial
61— State vs James B. Little and surety, E. D. Scercy—Sci Fa—For trial
62— State vs Winola Clemmons and sureties, Louise Clemmons and E. C.
Clemmons—Sci Fa—For trial
63— State vs R. L. Foster—Sci—Fa—For trial
64— State vs Evelyn J. Crawford and surety, J. C. Crawford Sci Fa—For trial
65— State vs C. C. Cone, and surety, J. W. Correll—Sci Fa—For trial
79—State vs Brunell Whirlow—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
50— State vs Roscoe Williams—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
81— State vs Lon Freeze—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial
82— State vs Othel Shoaf—Vio. Pro. Law—For trial v
83— State vs W. L. Brown—Disposing Mtged Property—For trial
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1933:
84— State vs Lewis Beck—Abandonment—For trial
85— State vs Hoy Stikeleather—Abortion—For trial
86— State vs Howard Fox—B & E—For trial
87— State vs Calvin Snider—D. W. D.—For trial
88— State vs Charles Tutterow—Abandonment—For trial
90— State vs Newt Overcash—Highway Robbery—For trial
91— State vs Wade Shoe—B & E—L & R—For trial
92— State vs Belton Boler—Forgery—For trial
93— State vs M. M. Anderson—D & D—For trial
CIVIL CASES
CASES FOR JUDGMENT:
9— Rowan County vs. E. H. Bean. ’’"Rendleman
11—F. R. Bailey vs. Harry G. Melville, et al, *"Shuford-Rendleman
14—Carroll T. Overton vs. Conley Martin, * Shuf ord-Carlton
37—Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. vs. W. J. Talley, " Gooch-Barringer
46—James Parham vs. J. R. Williams, et al, * Waggoner
71—William Matthews vs. Dever Wilkes Matthews, ^Hudson
77—Charles W. Taylor vs. John A. Wright, s'Linn-Withers & Gardner
102—Cora Mae Peeler, et al vs. P. A. D. Peeler, et al, * Woodson-Swice good
Linn
129—E. I. DuPont, et al. vs. H. F. Deese. "Rendleman
116—Bessie Bostian vs. Albert Bostian, i:'Maupin
101—J. F. Turner vs. State Highway Commission of N. C., * Linn
TRIDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 1933:
4—Myrtle Gould Gantt, et al, vs. Auto-Vac Co. Inc.. *Waggoner-Carlton
5 5—Ina Pauline Day vs. James Arthur Day. *Shuford
65— Carrie Ellenburg vs. John W. Ellenburg, ’•" Hudson
74—L. M. Morris vs. Annie Morris, *Z. A. Morris. Jr.
123—Margaret B. White vs. Bernie E. White. * Wright
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1933:
104—E. G. Thompson, et al, vs. H. T. Miller, et al. *Woodson-Rendleman
10— J. C. Sherrill vs. M. L. Rhodes, "Gooch-Ingle
12— W. F. Wolfe vs. McCanless Motor Co., *Bogle-Shuford
13— F. B. Price, 3rd. vs. Aaron Mason, * Gooch
15—Mrs. Emma Grubb vs. Town of East Spencer. N. C.. ’•'"Martin &
Brinkley-Carlton
20—A. L. Jarrell et al, vs. George Green, * Huffman & Burke-Furr
23_A. M. Evans, et al. trading as Salisbury Iron Works vs. Milo Kluttz,
*Huffman-Swicegood
26—B. M. Bradford vs. Annie Mae Bradford, et al. * Newell-Bullard &
Stringfield
29_L. H. Owens vs. McCanless Motor Company. "‘"Waggoner-Shuford
38—Piedmont Sales Company vs. J. A. Lee, * Maupin-Barnnger
47—D. B. Dixon, et al, vs. Zeb V. Fisher, "Shuford-Barringer
49_Will W Wadsworth vs. Melinda Wadsworth. *Waggoner-Hudson
51 Rowan County and Rose Clendennin vs. Ed Steele, *Craige & Harns
Waggoner
53_Ernest Bell vs. Jim Chambers. !i"Kesler-Huffman
56—A. L. Lofin vs. W. H. Lash and wife M. V. Lash, *Furr-Shuford
59_X. M. Stanback, et al, trading as The Stanback Medicine Co., vs. W.
PL (Bud) Rummage. "Gooch-Reynolds
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1933:
$3_X. V. Mangum vs. Paul Gallimore, *Williams-Carlton
64_Salisbury Morris Plan Co. vs. C. W. Armstrong, et al. *Carlton-Hudson
66— L. G. Goodman vs. W. B. J. Bost. *Trexler-Woodson _
75—James Albright Harris, et al, vs. North Carolina Railroad, ’“Shuford
Linn
79—James Franklin vs. Towell City Motor Co., Inc., ““Huffman & Gregory
Hudson
81—Lily Ruth Metz, ex rel. vs. Will Wadsworth, *
83—Harvey Goodman and wife. Rener Goodman vs. Ethel Lingle Good
man and F. R. Waggoner, Trustee, ’“Rendleman-Waggoner
86—Carrie L. Stewart, Admr. of T. H. Stewart, vs. Phoebe Doar, et al,
* Shuf ord-W right
91—Mrs. Pearl D. Crawson, Admr., et al. vs. Ed C. Campbell, et al ““Par
rish & Deal-Burke & Burke
97— A. B. Saleeby, trading as Saleeby Distributing Co* vs. A. T. Ateyah
““Shuf ord
98— McCanless Motor Company vs. L. A. Poole, ’“Shuford
99— A. B. Saleeby, trading as Saleeby Distributing Co. vs. S. J. Ateyah
““Shuford
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1933:
100—J. D. Loflin, vs. Dl W. Plyler, ““Hudson
103—Wachovia Bank & Trust Company & W. Barrett Taylor, Trusteees, vs.
Mrs. W. Barrett Taylor, et al. *Linn
106— Atlantic Joint Stock Land Bank of Raleigh vs. Zeb. V. Fisher, et al.
» * Hudson
107— Mattie Morrison vs. Gate City Life Ins. Co.. ““Shuford-Linn
110—Griffith L. Williams vs. James R. Roberts. ’“Coughenour-Wright
112 Effie Muskelly vs. R. C. Jensen, ““Shuford-Linn
113—The Tomlinson Co., et al, vs. E. E. Darnell, trading as Piedmont
Plumbing Co., et al. ““Falk
115—Lonnie A. Miller. Gdn. et al vs. Dora Dell Dingham Miller, et al
““Woodson. Waggoner-Rendleman
117—H. A. Rouzer, et al vs. Jack Bauknight. et al. ’“Carlton-Coggins
122—In re: The Will of Candas Fox, ““Wright
128-—Durham Loan & Trust Co. et al vs. Hickory Telephone Co., et al
« ’“Watkins-Cline. Bagby
131—R. J. Rakestraw, et al vs. Dr. J. W. Zimmerman, et al, ““Rendleman
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1933:
135—C. D. Peeler, trading as Peeler’s Printery vs. Trustees of Livingstone /
College, ’“Hudson
137—W. M. Brown vs. Cameron Morrison and W. C. Coughenour, ““Harris
Coughenour
140^2—The Atlantic Refining Company vs. H. T. Coughenour and C. P.
Coughenour, ““Rendleman
144—Mabel Thomason Davis vs. A. E. Davis, ““Hudson
146— Bryce P. Beard vs. Spruce Pine Cash & Carry Co., ““Gooch
147— North Carolina Bank & Trust Company vs. N. A. Trexler and C. R.
Prospt, ’“Carlton
I