In its decision declaring the Guf fey Bituminous Control Law u’ constitutional, the Supreme Com * of the United States followed in the main the same line 'of reasoning which led to the death of NRA. The grounds for throwing out both tof these acts, SRA and the Guffey Coal Act, are that the production of coal, if not slaughtering of chickens, is not inter-state com merce and therefore Congress has no power to regulate it. On this point the Supreme Court divided, six to three, exactly the same line up as in the NRA decision, with Justices Brandeis, Stone and Cardo zo in the minority. The majority iopinion held that the regulation of wages, hours and conditions of la bor in the soft coal industry is local matter to be settled locally. It al so held that the law delegated legis lative authority unconstitutionally. The Ctourt also ruled against another major feature of the Guf fey Act. the taxation provision. The law provided for an excise tax of 15 percent of the total value of coal mined, to be paid by the mine operators; but operators who signed the soft coal code were to receive a rebate of 90 percent of this tax This the Supreme Court held, was an improper and unconstitutional use of the taxing power to impost a penalty upon operators who re fussed to be coerced into signing up. ANNULMENT EXPECTED The annulment of the Guffey Act by the Supreme Court was not unexpected. It was commonly re ferred to in Washington as "The Little NRA.” In principle it dif fered in no way from the National Recovery Act, and serious doubts as to its Constitutionality were held by leaders of both parties in Con gress at the time of its enactment. It was pending at time of the NRA decision last summer, and the tendency then was to drop it be cause it so clearly seemed to be ex actly paralled to NRA. It was at that critical moment that the Pres ident wrote to Representative Hill, Chairman, expressing the hope that the Committee would not let anv1 doubt of the constitutionality of the Guffey Bill prevent its being re ported to the House for action. The real reason behind the bill’s passage was the threat of the Unit ed Mine Workers of a general c(oai strike on Septen-t)ci 15 .an year, unless Congress passed some law that would compel the mine owners and operators to accede to the de mand of the union for shorter hours and higher pay. There was no doubt that the miners were desperate and that they meant business. There was talk of riots extensive enough to be called rebellion among the Pennsylvanian miners unless some thing was done and done quickly. EXCISE TAX REFUND Many large mine owners who re fused to sign the code paid the ex cise tax under protest, at the same time starting legal proceedings to have the law declared unconstitu tional. About $700,000 of these taxes have to be refunded. Chief Justice Hughes, while con curring in the majority opinion of the Court wrote an individual opin ion in which he held that some fea tures of the Guffey Law might be constitutional if they tould be sep arated from the unconstitutional phases of it. RESETTLEMENT DECISION On the same day that tiie GufFey Act decision was handed down, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia handed down a decision that the Rural dcscttlement Admin istration, created by the President under the Works Progress Admin istration, with Dr. Rexford G. Tug well at its head, was an unconstitu tional delegation of power under the WPA Act. While this decision is not final, and will be carried to the Supreme Court, it is notable as the first judicial reversal of any of the applications of the $4,800,000, OOOWorks Relief fund which Con. gress gave to the President early last year, to use in his own dis cretion. Naturally, the question which everybody in Washington is asking is as to the political effects tof these new anti-Administration Court de cisions. Coming as they did, al most on the eve of the party con ventions, it is to be expected that every possible effort tjo utilize them for party ends will be made by the Republicans. (Continued on page four) The Carolina Watchman rrit ,_A NEWSPAPER DEVOTED TO THE UPBUILDING OF ROWAN COUNTY FOUNDED 1832—104TH YEAR SALISBURY, N. C., FRIDAY MORNING, MAY 29, 1936 VOL. 104 NO. 44 PRICE 2 CENTS County Primary Ticket I STATE SENATE (Vote for one) E. C. Gregory, Sr.; J. C. Kesler; Ralph C. Jamison and C. P. Bar ringer. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE (Vote for two) George R. Uzzell; J. W. Bean; Walter Murphy; C. C. Owen and Ralph Simmerson. SHERIFF (Vote for one) J. H. Krider; Reid Goodson. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY (Vote for one) John C. Kesler; C. O. P. Trexler. _ COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (Vote for five) R. Linn Bernhardt, Salisbury! township; O. L. Linn, China Grove;! T. M. Byrd, Litaker; J. T. Graham, Cleveland; C. A. Long, Providence, Ralph Current, Scotch Irish; J. F. Link, Salisbury. I BOARD OF EDUCATION (Vote for One) Carl Hall, Steele township; Roy S. Safrit, Litaker. The following are unopposed: W. V. Harris, for County Judge; W. D. Kizziah for Register of Deeds j and J. E. Haynes for Qounty Audi tor. The race for the Democratic nomination for Governor seems to have completely overshadowed the candidacies of the local aspirants, and the Watchman suggests that the voters seriousi/ consider these candidates, and select men who are qualified to discharge the duties in cident to the offices for which they aspire. This Gounty should send | capable and qualified men to the ; next session of the Legislature, be i cause it will be lone of the most i important sessions ever convened in j Raleigh. j George R. Uzzell is a candidate to succeed himself, subject to the Demlocratic Primary. He was a member of the 1931 and 193 5 Le gislature, and by reason of his ex perience in these sessions, he is qual ified to represent Rowan County in the 1937 session. Last year he was I a member of the following impor ' tant committees. Finance, Game, j Judiciary No. 1, Manufacturers and j Labor, Rules, Public Welfare. En | rolled Bills, and was Chairman of j the Committee on Public Utilities, j During the closing days of the Legislature it is customary for the Speaker of the House to select five clompetent, and conservative men to act as a Calendar Committee to study all Bills introduced during the rush of the closing days, and thus prevent unjust legislation. In the 193 5 session Mr. Uzzell was selected as Chairman of this Com mittee, and in such capacity ren dered the State a great service. He saved the land owners of the State thousands of dollars by his vigorous opposition to the Senate Tax Fore | closure Bill, which contained a gross penalty on those unable to promptly pay their taxes. By his Bill to readjust street assessments he permitted home owners an addi — (Continued on page four) I ilw The WEEK’S NKWSI;1 TABULATING RECORD “ VOTE —The Public Action | Committee is instructed by | its 23,000 members to in* g augurate an annual pe^ce | celebration by all countries si of North and South America. | The idea came simultane*