1
" -0
ml
THE SENTINEL
NEWBERNJ
SATURDAY, MARCH T. 1829
, ...v.'ft well wrmeii
W iniifrt III OUr COlUUlua"" J -e
insert m o r w . canvokiog the
ftrticle m opposition to he pi "
ftMr' dSferSthe writer in some of
?rto have the benefit of
A.spu"-- - -0 olua)ns are open to
hi, correspondence, uurc be
, r.f this nuestion, ano
,M ' . 7" ,Cai from " A Subscriber, .
please" .. - c
this or any other subject
. . f Mnndav last, near Trent
Br7d" e laa cDuZan, a young ma. of about 1
v Irs ofte, son of William Duncan, formerly of
ears ol a'. an nnknown assassin.
this town, was mum j
!. . , .'a nnie amonff the hogs, and sus
He naa " r - tnok his
Iirsiu( -
nd went out. Atewyarus u
down roortauy nunu
tun ann wcui v , k B:m
received ..ho. fro.
rtn v wounded. e nc " .
No clue has yet been discovered by
next uay- ' , K..t we trut
u:-k Murderer can be traced, but we trusi
Willi" ,
iuslice will not long be eluded.
Mr. AdTld
. .,, h the limited size oi our
Boston Federalists
C li
from re-Dubliling at lengtn.ioe ""i---"
. it- A Name and the
Deiween . . , ., f,.mn
rbich we copiea iai -
The summary w
leu it Mr- Adams had solemnly, before the na
tion repeated his charge of treason, and sketched
briefly the commencement, pretext, and proba
ble plan of the conspiracy, at the same tinie that
he declined to furnish the proofs, of which he
stated himself to be possessed. The gentlemen
who had addressed him, with equ;.l solemnity, ap
pealed to the citizens of the U. S. disavowing for
themselves, and their party, all knowledge of
such a project io any shape. Here the Corres
pondence closed.evidently much to the disadvan
tage of Mr. Adams. The general impression
as, that he had quibbled and evaded, from a
consciousness of the deficiency of the proof in
his possession. The Washington ' Journal" of
the 26th Feb. gives some additional papers, evi
dently furnished by Mr. Adams himself, which
throw some additional light on the subject, and
materially change the face of the question. What
ever may be uir bearing upon the political integ
rity of Mr. Adams, and the purity of his motives,
they certainly give him the vantage ground in
the controversy.
The papers are five in number, 1. A letter from
Mr. Adams, to William Plumer, Esq. dated Aug.
13, 1S09. 2. An important letter from Gov. Plu
mer to Mr. Adams, dated Dec. 20, 182S. 3. Ano
ther extract of a letter ("from Mr. Adams) dated
June 30, 1811. 4. Extract from'a sermon. 6
Exiracts from the Journals of the Hartford Con
neotion. Doc. 2d, the letter of Gov. Plumer to Mr, A
tlams, is the most important paper, as it is the
firt -limp of positive proof yet given in sup
port of Mi Adams' charges. It will be fuund io
another column.
Gov. Plumer, however, gives neither names nor
particulars. His evidence will, of course, under
go the sifting of tlx Boston Federalists.
We have received a communication signed JIT,
the length of which, and the press of matter ren
der it impossible for us to insert it. We have,
however, given the mathematical question with
which it concludes, and invite a solution.
A and B bought three hundred acres of land in
co-partnership; each paid three hundred dollars.
But A in consideration of having in the division a
better quality of land than B, pays seventy-five
cents an acre more than the latter. How much
Jand does each one have f
Erratum. A misprint occurred last week,
which needs correction. In the -middle of the
second column, the word have was introduced in
italicks ,by mistake ; the sentence should have
read thus " a parcel of stockholders contrived,"
instead of "have contrived." It however makes
co alteration in the argument.
We have no time to waste on the Bush-Fight-r."
The " Jack Rugby" of the Comedy, we
fcave never regarded him but as an underling,
ready to carry the rapiei",and "follow trie
lieeW' of our Athenian Dr. Caius; and now that
ie has been discharged Irom that service, we re
cognise no claim which be ran possibly have to
our notice. He does nothing but regularly re
peat the impertinence in which he is tutored, and
Jfgu.arly to weaken every thing which he repeats
The Washington l elegiaph of Feb. 26lh, con
ms mc loiiowwg annunciation of the new Cabi
net, which nuay, w presume, be regarded as ol
tied: .
"THE NEW CABINET.
H'd to say, that the new Cabi-
"ill OI
offtate." f New York' "Secury
larv ; L"gnam0 Pennsylvania, M Secre-
jlt Postmaster General
War. ' Aen,1se. Secretary of
dtB'Th' ofKorh Carolina, a. Secretary
Xo ti Z 1 1' lhM the Pomaster Genera! is
P.:"CAUd.ed ,n ,h CWne. We learn that the
Wi b yesterday received a letter frum
Theoth "P'ing'he State Department.
t.o,ifiJie.ruge,',,eroenare ""hi' city, and have
tueir accernan
Indiana, w here the majority for the Jackson
ucKet exceeded 500, the State ofi-
.tateTffl'1 &S fo!-All the principa,
Jvc ,,Cers in number 23, are for Mr. Adams.
f,, ' iuici uui o, oemg i, are
irei Pa"y also two Senators in Con
cioai p .t..r,r..,,v,ol ana ivi prm-
t& off masterfc' 1 lie othr Pf y have in all,
ers.
Crmf
re. Calder
ftre q Dimarara. Th
"'MII
arrived at Eastporr on the I2th
u t :.. . "
Wth r- - " ,rom Aerniiraa- Capt. C. in.
cit. u of the Eas,Por Sentinel'that
''sied tin Jbee" destroyed by fire. The fire
eboutiKr " of three lIaJrs nd had tended
(00 nl"v to,les- Th reported at 500.-
Vie bv "originated in an extensive ware
,rom if0fneru,n' which a man was pumping
Vre r g5i'ea king fire from a candle,
arc no further parTiculari received.
To H. B. Croom, Esq. '
Permit us, sir, to congratu.
late you on the novel evidences of spirit which
you displayed in the last Spectator. Dislodged
at length, from your ambuscade among bushes,
and " Bush fighters," and forced into the open
field, you have ; albeit very reluctantly, thrown
aside your disguises and subterfuges, and like a
man of spirit, spoken out under your own name.
We hail this as a symptom of compunctious feel'
ing for past meanness, and as an assurance that
similar discipline properly applied, may work an
entire reform in your whole editorial conduct. As
you have been prevailed upon to substitute a
courage bordering upon rashness, for your for
mer pusillanimity, we trust that in due time you
inay be also taught, to prefer argument to mere
balderdash, openness and truth to false insinua
tion?, and to exchange vulgar invectiye and
coarse ribaldry, for the courteous manners and
decorous language of a gentleman. We are not
so sanguine, however, as to expect that so great
a transformation will be speedily effected, or that
you will, immediately perceive the necessity of a
change. You aret not an apt scholar, Mr. Croom,
and vulgar habits, especially when accompanied
by much conceit and much ill-temper, are always
extremely difficult to be conquered.' The duller
the intellect, the greater the conceit, and the
more irritable the temper, the more remote will
be the prospect of improvement ; and, therefore,
as we siid before, Mr. Croom, we are not san
guine to'your immediate reformation.
Of one thingl,however,'we may Tie certain, so
far as it is possible to be certain in our specula
tions upon the probable conduct of a man, who
acts so strangely and inconsistently as you do
We think that you will not readily forget the les
son which you have already received ; that it wil
prevent you from confederating hereafter wit h
your own underlings for the purpose of circula
ting anonymously, the impertinence to which even
you wen- ashamed to lend your editorial sanc
tion; and we are very certain that when for the
purpqse of combining your resources against
single adversary, you form another alliance with
the joint stock company of amateur editors who
assist you. in managing the affairs of the Specta-
J J
tor, ana in prosecuting your anonymous ueience
of yourself, that you will be very cautions w ith
whom you intermeddle.
Thus much, Mr. Croom, for the new relation of
an open adversary, ii which you have placed
yourself towards us. We say this new relation,
because we have never, in this matter, recognised
any other " real" antagonist, than yourself. It
argues a greater stolidity than we imagined you
to possess, to suppose that we could be duped, or
that you could shun responsibility , by yourshallow
artifice of inserting, anonymously, in your own co
litmus,' the impertinence and falsehood which you
prompted yourself, and from the consequences
which you desired to escape. According to
our old fashioned notions of propriety ,you would
be responsible under the circumstances, had you
never written a word for the bushfighters and un
derlings. - How then, when the fact is likewise
1
unquestionably true, notwithstanding your dis
claimers, that you aided in preparing these
4 bushfighting7 assaults, how then, say we, can
you with any color of decency or propriety, at
tempt to fix the odium or the responsibility upon
another? Believe us, Mr. Croom, that a sense
of selrespect, ought in the midst of the tempest
of your anger, to have saved you from so wild and
inconsistent an evasion. The imbecility of your
previous attack?, we have attributed to the feeble
ness of an intellect tasked beyond its capacities,
by ill-assorted acquirements, and accompanied by
an irritable temperament and a depraved taste.
The instance before us, together with several
others of the same description contained in your
last week's address, has added to the feebleness,
coarseness and. vulgarity of your general style
of controversy, some blacker traits than we ima
gined within the limited range of your capacity.
A decent regard for the dignity of the Senatorial
character which it is your chance to bear, will
prevent us from being guilty of the indecorum
of givingyou the lie direct, or calling you that
most dangcrdus of all animals a malicious fool,
yet with every respect for the citizens of the
county of Lenoir, whose distinguished represen
tative you are, we think, that before we leave
you. weshall,not find much difficulty in shewing
that you deserve both. .
Permit us, therefore to put a few questions to
you ; not that we expect an answer from you, but
that you may understand in what light your
coane and malicious insinuations are under
stood.
- Where; sir, will you find a particle of evidence
for your fabulous history of the manner in which
the editorial department of this paper canoe into
its present hands f We ask for evidence, for
your words will require a warrant. If every syl
lable were true, as every syllable is a mere ro
mance of your own coining, what just blame could
possibly attach itself to the transaction ? Is there
shame, "or reproach, except in the distorted ima
ginationi of men as unjust, as inhospitable and ma
lignant as Hardy B. Croom, in the open prosecu
tion of an enterprise of public spirit ; undertaken,
jn the lawful exercise of an honorable profession;
a profession in which you, sir, have unavailingly
sought for distinction ? Passing over the perso
nal imputation contained in your fable, with no
othernoticethan merely to throw it back into your
teeth as a vile falsehood, have you further reflect
ed that your insulting meaning reaches beyond
us to a large and respectable portion of the com
munity, who belong to the successful party 7, Men
who in talent,' education, means, influence, every
thing which makes respectability or usefulness,are
equal to you, sir,: or to any station to which your
reasonable expectations of iuture eminence can
justify you in looking forward? And, sir, to
what purposes of argument or defence, are tne
ribald language and coarse insinuation in which
you can reconcile it to your self-respect, to in
dulge? If Editor, Publisher, and all parties in
terestedin, or connected with the Sentinel, were
every thing that you would insinuate that we are,
prodigals and bankrupts, is Hardy B. Croom,
therefore, a better or more consistent legislator,
or more excusable for his neglect, iacorapetence,
or injustice as one of the Minority Committee ?
Or is it, sir, a safe reproach for you to make, in
debted as you are, for every thing that you pos-
sesbe it more or less, to the bounty of others,
whose'independence, if-you have one, was ac
quired by the toils of another and by no merit ol
your own ; and who, but for the accident of your
birth, might be at this mpment fagging for your
daily subsistence, as the pedagogue of some back
country school ? The implication in your illiberal
taunt, was obviously thrown in merely for em
bellishment, for you could not -know the fact,
or knowing the truth, you have wilfully missta
ted. Let no fear, therefore, of the beggary"
of the Sentinel, prevent you from bringing your
action of libel- Independent of the certainty
which you will thereby attain, that-the Sentinel
will be supported by ample means, you may
learn that the lowest ejfimate of means which we
may be computed to possess, will abundantly an
swer this matter.
Let us, however, examine this "libellous" mat
ter together. You are a lawyer, sir, and seem
to be deeply read in the doctrines of quo warran
to and libel. You can, therefore, have no right
to complain if we examine bow far y our testimo
ny agrees with the acknowledged facts, and how
far your explanations are coherent with each
other.
You will not deny that your name wasigned
to the report of the Minority Committee, which
concluded in these words :
4 The undersigned, therefore, recommend to the
Legislature the adoption of the following resolu
tion, ,
Whereas it appears ta the Legislature, that the
State Bank, the Bank of Newbern and the Bank
of Cape Fear, have violated their charters, and
committed ereat frauds on the people of North
Carolina, wherebv said Banks have forfeited
the powers and privileges granttdby their eAar
THEREFURE .
Be it resolved by the General Assembly of the
State of North Carolina, that the Attorney Gen
eral be and he is hereby directed forthwith to in
stitute a judicial enquiry into the conduct of tjie
said several Banks ; and l hat he prosecute such
enquiry by writ of quo warranto or other lega
process.
You certainllr will not contend that this resolu
tion is a specific recommendation of a writ of
quo warranto. Upon the face, of the Resolution,
the phrase quo warranto or other legal process,
means nothing more than a general suggestion by
the Committee of the means by which the prima
ry object ot their resolution is to be obtained; the
enforcing-of the forfeiture of the Bank charters
To the discretion of the Attorney General, was
left the legal process, with a mere incidental men
tion of a particular form of enquiry by the Com
mittee. The object to be obtained was distinctly
set forth in the preamble. In your explanatory
statement, you invert the natural order of things,
and giving, yourself credit for the means which
you suggested, are very careful to keep out of
view the avowed end which your quo warranto
or other process, was designed to effect the for
feiture of the charters of the Banks.
Did you reflect upon the enormous injustice of
this plan ? Did you pause for a moment, and
Consider, or even enquire, the effect which a
successful prosecution of your writ would have
upon the corporations? - Listen to Mr. Gaston's
language on this topic ; jour opinion you will
scarcely venture to put in competition with his
on a question of law. '
' Do you. wish to produce a forfeiture of the
charters ? Its effect is a dissolution of the corpo
rations a complete extinction of their existence.
And when, this takes place, what is the condition
of our coontry ? Upon a dissolution of a coroo-
ration upon its civil death 1 state the law to
be, and I state it with an entire readiness -to
pledge, on the correctness of this statement, my
professional reputation, whatever it may be I
state the law to be, that the lands-of the Corpora
tion revert to those from whom they came -that
the personal chattels are taken by the State for
the want of an owner ami that all debts due to
or from the corporation are completely and fore
ver extinguished. Suppose the Bank Corpora
tions dissolved, then, and what is the condition
of our country 1. The debtors are indeed releas
edthey may be benefitted by the tremendous
catastrophe. But what is the value of the million
and a half of the bank notes in circulation? They
are converted into rags. What the value of your
7027 shares of Bank Stock ? Whence will come
your available funds to carry on the operations
of Government ? How are you, from an impo
verished people to raise the necessary revenue ?"
Are you not, then, justly chargeable with hav
ing started this scheme of forfeiture thus charac
terised by Mr. Gaston ? And how can you recon
cile it to the integrity of fair argument, to divide
your quotation, and take ouly so much of it as
defends yourself, omitting the most material part
of the whole sentence ? The State, as a Director
has controlled, or ought to have controlled all the
transactions of the Banks; as a stockholder she
has profited immensely by the very acts of which
she complains. Your scheme, if successful,
would have had the effect of making the accom
plice, at once, the abuser, the witness, the judge
and the jury.
Can we hesitate, therefore, in calling your
scheme unjust, tyrannical and profligate? We
hesitate not to say that its successful' issue would
deserve no name more light than," plunder and
proscription."
You signed the Report of the Minority, in
which this scheme was started, and yet you say
that you were opposed to Mr. Potter's first Bill,
founded upon that Report," and that you so ex
pressed yourself. Where, sir ? Not in the House
of Commons, for you had no voice-there not in
the Senate, for the Bill never reached there.
Your disapprobation must have been private and
unofficial ; your sanction to the principle is on re
cord under jour own hand.
A Bill was introduced into the Senate which
proposed a quo warranto, saving the rights of
property to all concerned. But as you expressly
state, that you neither introduced it or procured
it to be introduced, the reference which you make
to that Bill, is entirely misplaced. Your whole
defence, therefore, resolves itself into your simple
allegation of a fact of which we could not possi
bly have had knowledge, and which is totally un
important in itself, that you said to some body,
some where, that you were opposed tto Mr. Pot
ter's'bill. You have, in the conclusion of your explanatory
tirade, talked mystically about Polyphemus.Ulys
ses, the den of the Cyclops, and other classical
things and persons, but have not had the good
fortune to make yourself intelligible.
VerilyMr. Croom, explanation does not seem
o be your forte. A plain tale plainly told, is be
yond your mark. A single absurdity might have
passed as the accident of a day, or the involunta
ry fault of your intellectual conformation, but
such repetitions and refinements of absurdity as
you bring together, when it is your, misfortune to
be called upon for explanation, can pass for noth
ing else than premeditated nonsense.
You have formally taken your Jeave of iis. and
retired from the '-field- of controversy. Perhaps
you have judged wisely in sodoing. Deeply as
you have involved yourself in prevarications and
inconsistencies, it is but natural that you should
wish this matter to rest here. . Do not, however,
flatter yourself with the idea that you can escape
us thus : In the great question which is agitating
the country, no man holding the station which
you do, shall be permitted to shun the difficulties
of the subject, or evade an investigation iuto his
own personal share in public transactions.
Here we take leave of you for the present.
While we are very certain, that when we leave
you finally, you will not use the words of Cicero
upon the flight of Catatine, to which yo-i so po
litely refer, we are equally certain, that the next
six words in the sentence, which you as usual
make it convenient to omit, will answer ve.y well
for your private meditations nulla jam' pernicies
a monstro illo. As you have given up translation
of late, we will render it for you freely thus " I
shall now be no more troubled with that terrible
fellow." You recognise the truth of my conjee-.
ture, and wish for an opportunity of profitiug by
our suggestion.
From the National Journal. j
Extract of a letter from William Plumer,
heretofore a Senator of the United States,
and afterwards Governor of New Hamp
shire, . f
Epping, N. H. Dec. 20, 1828.
During the long and eventful session of
Congress ol 1SOJ and 1804; I was a me in
ber of the Senate, and was at the city of
Washington every day of that session v In
the course of the session, at different times
and places, several of the Federalists,
Senators and Representatives, from the
New England States, informed me that the
thought il necessary to establish a separate
government in New. England, and, if it
should be found practicable, to extend it so
far South as to include Pennsylvania ; but
in all events to establish one in New Eng
land. They complained, tlttst the slave
holding Stales had acquired, by means of
their slaves, a greater increase ol Represen
tatives in the House than was just and
equal; that too great a portion of the pub
lie revenue was raised in Noithern States,
and too much of it expended in the South
ern and Western Slates; and that the ac
quisition of Louisian & the new States that
wete formed, and those to be formed in the
West and in the ceded Territory, would
soon annihilate the weight and influence of
the Northern Slates in the government.
Their intention, they said, was to estab
lish .their new government under the au
thority.and protection of StateGovernments.
That, having secured the election of a go
vernor and a majority of a Legislature in a
State in favour of a separation, the Legis
lature should repeal the law authorising the
people to elect representatives to Congress,
and the Legislature decline electing Sena
tors to Congress,' and gradually withdraw
the State from the Union, establish custom
house officers to grant Register?, and clear
ances to vessels, and eventually establish a
federal government in the Northern and
E'astert) States. And that if New England
united in the measure, jt would in due time
be.effected without resorting to arms.
Just before that session of Congress
closed, one of the gentlemen to whom 1
have alluded, informed me, that arrange
ments had been made to have the next au
tumn in Boston, a select meeting of the
leading federalists in New England, to con
sider and recommend the measures neces
sary to form a sy stein of Government for
the Northern Stales, and that Alexander
Hamilton, of New York, had consented to
attend that meelin
Soon after my return from Washington,
I adopted the most effectual means in my
power to collect the opinions of well infor
med leading federalists in New Hampshire,
upon the subject. I found some in favor of
the measure,, but a great majority of them
decidedly opposed to the project; and
from (he partial and limited inquiries I
made in Massachusetts, the tesult appeared
to be nearly similar to that in New Hamp
shire.. The Gentleman, who in the winter of
1803 and 1804, informed trie there was to
be a meeting f the federalists in the autumn
of 1S04 at Boston, at the session of Con
gress in the winter of 1804 and 1805, ob
served to me, that the death of General
Hamilton had prevented the meeting ; but
the project was not, and would not be aban
doned. . I owe it toypu as well as myself, to state
explicitly, that in lite session of Congress,
in the winter of 1803 and 1804, I was my
sejf in favor of (ouning a separate Govern
ment in New England ; and wrote several
confidential letters to a few of my friends
and . correspondents, recommending the
measure. But afterwards, upon thoroughly
investigating and maturely considering the
subject,' I was fully convinced that my opin
ion in favour or separation was the most
erroneous that I ever formed upon political
subjects. -The only consolation 1 had, was
that my error in opinion had not produced
any acts injurious to the integrity of the
Union. When the same project was reviv
ed in 1808 and 1809, during the embargo
and non-intercourse, and afterwards, dur
ing the war of 1812, 1 used every effort in
my power, both privately and publiclyto
defeat the attempt then made to establish a
separate independent government in the
Northern States.
You are at liberty to make such use of
this communication as you shall consid er
proper.
Accept the assurance of my high respect
and esteem.
WILLIAM PUJMER.
Quick Travelling. The United States
mail coach with 1700 weight of mails, six
passengers and the guard, arrived at Phila
delphia on Monday morning from New
York in 9 hours and 32 mirjutes.
MARRIED, ..
In Beaufort County, on Thursday evening, 261"
ult. by Thomas Ellison, Esq. Mr. ABISH WIL
LIS, of this County, to MUt MARY PRITCHEv
daughter of Peter Pritchet, Esq. of Beaufort
County.
DIED,
In this place, on the 26th ult. Capt. RICHARD
WOOD, in the 70th year of his age, formeily of
New liedford, Massachusetts. " ; i
State of North Carolina,,)
Ckavkn Counjy.
Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions, Feb
, ruary Term, A. DJl82).
James Riggs '
vs. Original Attachment,
Richard Tillman. )
44 Levied on 60 acres of Land, more or less, lying
on south side of Bay River, jomins the lands ot
David Tingle, January 31st, lSS)."
IT appearing to the Court, that Richard Till-,
man i iot an inhabitant of this County, it is
therefore, Ordered, that publication be made in
the North Carolina Sentinel for six weeks, that
said defendant appear. at tbe next Court ofTlea
and Quarter Sessions to be held for Craven
County, at the Court House in Newbern, on the
second Monday of May, 1829, and replevy or
plead to issue, or judgment will be e ate red up
against him.
Attest :
. JAMES G. STANLY, Clerk.
Feb. 27, 1829 '69. price adv. $5
POST-OFFICE,
AT IVBERN, March 7, 1 S29.
THE Postmaster gives notice that hereafter,
specie or specie funds will be required in
payment for postages accruing at this office. The
refusal of the contractors to receive North Caro
lina paper in payment for their drafts, reuders it
necessary for the Postmaster, although reluctant
ly, to establish this regulation in order to save
himself from the consequent loss.
PORK, LARD, &C.
4:0 barrels Mess PORK, ( . .
70 o"o Prwne do.
5 do LARD,
1 2 keffs do,
400 Bacon bams, for sale by
JNO.
Newbern, March 4 1829.
G. KINCEY
BARRELS Mess,
4. ft Do. Prime S
PORK,
Mia.'
For sale l.v HENRY W. JONES.
Feb. 14, 1829 '56-tf.
EAG-IiB HOTEL,
" WAYNESBOROUGH.
THE Subscriber respectfully in
forms his friends and the public
generally, that he has opened a
House of Entertainment, two hundred yards
East of the Coui t-IIouse, for the accommo
dation of Travellers and Boarders, and all
others who may favor him with their com
pany. There will be no pains spared on
his part to render, them comfortable. His
table will be furnished with the best the
Market affords, and an attentive Ostler will
be provided.
JNO. E. BLEDSOE.
February 1, 1829. 66 '
Storage, Wharfage, 8fc.
THE Subscriber having taken those large and
commodious Buildings lately occupied by
R. V. Orme.offers to receive on Storage or Wharf
age, property of any kind on the most reasonable
terms. Persons residing in the country, having
Produce that they wish either stored, shipped or
sold, wit have it punctually attended to by ad
dressing me A Smoke-House is attached to the
Buildings, and several Lofts ready nailed for
hanging Cacon.
Feb, 21. M. STEVENSON Jr.
New Goods.
RECEIVED This Day, per schr TRENT from
New York,
50 doz. Clark's spool Thread, low numbers,
10 pieces low priced Checks,
4 pieces bonnet Cambrics, assorted colors
and prices,
A few pieces Ginghams,
10 pieces 4-4 Irish Linens,
2 do green Florence Silk,
1 do French Canton Flannel, :
A few pieces Cap Ribbons, I
12 do painting pith Paper,
10 doz. Berkley head Hdkfs.
2 do fancy Maildrass do.
Bolting Cloths of all numbers, fratn coarse to
superfine, warranted genuine, whicb will he sold
as low as can be found at any stor hi the United
States. , G. BRADFORD & CO.
Newbern, Feb. 13. '
COFFEE.
JUST RECEIVED, per schr. Triton, from' St
Domingo, 60 bags first quality Codee, which
will be sold cheap for Cash, by
Feb. 7, 1829 3t JNO. STREET.
FOR SALE.
FOR SALE, a Scow, with two Masts and thrre.
Sails in good repair, about ten tons bur
then. Apply to- C V. SVVAN
Feb. 7, 1829. '
(IT AT a meeting of the Commis
sioners of the Town of Newbern, 25th February.
1829, It-was Ordered, thatx'reward of to
hundred dollars, be paid by the Treasurer of the
Town, to any pemon who shall grve information
sufficient to convict the incendiary, who last night
set fire to the corner store, lately occupied br
William punn. " k 7
Ordered, That no person, he rermitfed to roll a
wheelbarrow on the side Walks, under the penalty
ot fitly cents for each offence, if a free person,
and if a slave ten lashes on his or her bare back.
This Ordinance to b,e enforced from add after the,
10th day of March next.
By Ordecof the Board,
NATHAN TISDALE, Clerk? f
Feb. 28, 1829. '63-'69 V
fa
E subscriber having at February Term of
Craven County Court, 1829. qualified as ad-
jitiiisirBiui rv uui"iuuiniii, hic vi tins vuuiiiy,
deceased, .revest? all persons indebted to said
deceased,! her bv note or acceptance, to make;
immediate payment, and all to whom the estate!
is indebted; to present their claims properly test-,
ed within the time prescribed by law, or this no- '
tice will be plead in bar of recovery. .
JAMES YY. HALL.
Adams Creek, Feb. 12, 1829. . v
JUST PUBLISHED,
And for sale at T. WA TSQNS Book Store,
THE NUMBERS OF CARLTON,
Addressed to the People of Nortl-Carolina on a
Central Rail Road through the Stte '
- -f'V i
1
. 'v i
t.'i
- ' ' U.;
.r;r
.ft
r'.'t NX M
M
urn
V..'-
ft
v i
J
. 'J "
i .v.
MM
:sh
'.i -A i
.I '-. I'
f
k
I