North Carolina Newspapers

NO JUT HL P AiaOJLi A SMN T I N.MJL . : ! CONGfiESS. 1st Session 22d Congress. DEBATE IN, THE SENATE, ON THE NO ! J MINATION OF MR. VAN BUREN. Ma.-Fobstyh's Speech 'in Reply to Mb. Miller. N Mr. President: We were told fay the Senator who has just concluded, in the beginning of his extraordinary speech, that he mtcnaca 10 puo lisli hU rrmftrks for his own vindication. No friend of Mr. VanBuren will complain of the fulfillment of this intention. 1 Of the lorifflist of offences committed by Mr. Van Buren,, it was natural that the Senator should begin with those at home. lie says General Jackson has been separated from him and his friends by the artifices of Mr. Van Bu irr'n. and he tells us of his own zeal and devo tion to the hero of New Orleans; and read ex tracts from his own speech at the Waxaws, when he assured his auditors that 44 the philoso- rihv of nntiiTf" was " ft Riiffieient PUarantv" for sullied integrity, in whose hands the., best "and dearest interests of the people may be safely confided. And are rsuch men office seekers, and interested devotees to existing power in South Carolina? If so, what are' the patriots? They must be angels. They cannot be men. The Senator may eulogize his friends to the utmost of his power, exalt them in the scaie oi talent and integrity to the highest pitcn : i en- ture to place his opponents by tneir siucr auu challenge comparison without tearing or ing to depreciate in the sligntesi aegree iuC" nor of any of South Carolina's distinguished sons. ... The arrangement of the first cabinet did not r,WsA trie senator. South Carolina was neg lected. Governor Hamilton was told he might have been Secretary of War, but for his violence against the tariff: and what seemed to have ad ded venom to the sting, South Carolina was not only passed over, but an Attorney General was looked for in Georgia ; and all this was the work of the Dom Daniel of New York. The senator is difficult to please. He liked not the first, But how amilton? the General's " local attachments. it appear that, Mr. Van Burcn produced the and likes less the second cabinet, i dreadful Rfirraratinn? Noevidoncc of it is ex- was the fact in regard to Governor II tubited and. with due deference to the &ena- If my memory deceives me not, he has publicly tor, I would suggest that he was only mi5iah.ua declared ne-might nave naa omce, naa ne aesi- i a his theorv "the philosophy ot nature was red; he did not desire it. In this, ana in an Ii0t gQ strong a guaranty as ne imagim;u. um, i oincr mings, ne is incapaDic oi aeceu. jrasug urKni i Pinnated, fact? Has General Jack- over the unpardonable offence of going to Geor- l- boo forgotten his local-attachments, the land of gia for a member of the first cabinet, does the fhis birth aud of his earliest affections, where Senator really suppose the choice of the late he has somany devoted &, disinterested triends f 1 Attorney General was the work of Mr. V an isu- No sir; it is not possible, Uenerai jacKsonnas rCnr (Mr. Miller nodded an assent.) meoe- noi separated from South Carolina, nor has nator never committed a more eggregiousmis- Kouth, Carolina yet withdrawn from him, al- take. : Of all the men of the day, his equals in t hough the Senator seems to be earnestly hun- professional attainments and talents, admitted ting up causes for a divorce. to be great, I think he is the last man who The radical party in South Carolina the would have been selected by Mr. Van Buren ; Unionists have, the Senator says, given in and sure I am, Mr. Van Buren is the last man their adhesion from. interested motives to Mr. on earth to whose influence the late Attorney Van Burcn for the Succession to the Presidency General would havo been willing to owe his ad this is another of his crimes. Now, sir, place. jonsiuereu as me ongiuaiur bhu of the disagreement between the first and se- cond officers oi the government, Mr. van rm- is tn hftar the extremitv ot the Senator s I do not know that it is true .that Jhcy desire the succession for Mr. Van Buren; certainly the v.-might eo. further and fare worse, and fare much worse and not auite so far. For this supposed interested adhesion, they arc stigma ren wrath. On Jhis subject, Mr. President, I can ised here by one of their Senators. I am tread- 0nl v refer the Senate to the explicit ana prompt inf. Mr. President, upon almost forbidden denial of the justice of the charge by the party ground; travelling into a neighboring State to accused, long since publicly made, and never t. Ht i mot tnr f nrsp i xm lmnparnen nv anv one navinir a cituiu iu I-UUJIU lii IIS pyi BHiiU, vy m. .v,. .w. IJ "T " J J O Unocal tlincf. TIfaionists : we acted together character. The facts before the public prove in bv-f?onc times: we think alike still; and if I that the charge is the coinage of a distempered tRpir hnhalf. as the I hrnin. baseless as the fabrics of a vision. If the two Senators "from the State arc of the party Senator has any desire to enter into further m onnosed to them at home, thev miffht chance nuirv, I repeat here this explicit and positive to be condemned for the want of the plea of denial, in the name of an absent friend ; and if not truiltv to the chanrc exhibited acamst them, he ventures upon the investigation, l pieoge Under these circumstances, I stand? bound to myself to satisfy even his pre-occupicd mind, repel the imputations cast upon the anti-nulli-1 that not a shadow of suspicion can rest upon Tiers of South Carolina, and taking up the evi- Mr. Van Buren's fame. I speak on the high deuce, shall prove that they arc unjustly char- est authority, when I 6tatc to the Senate, that god. What is this evidence: The senator his deportment in relation to tnat controversy, vho makes the chanre on the question of the deserves the respect and admiration of every cminolc war. stood bv the General with firm- nes and zeal; defended him right or wrong. The radicals were among his cchsurers, and flic question is emphatically asked, where. was honorable and delicate mind. The Globe! the iilobe! the oliicial paper, has abused the Senator and his friends. The editor was brought here bv Mr. Van Buren, and Georgia then? Georgia then was where she is he is accountable for all it contains : all that is uow, and where I trust she will ever be found, bad, I mean he gets credit for no good, ap- hv the side of the Unionists, standing up for pear where it may. knight and reprehending the wrong. Ihe Benator seems to imagine that true patriotism consists in fa vbr df one?s friends, in ceasing to discriminate-between truth and error. Such is not our theory -for violated laws, wc hold all responsible, friends and foes. Recent develop ments have shewn that General Jackson had This charge is made because the Globe is cal led the crovernmcnt paper. Mr. Van Buren and the government being previously identified. I must not bo misunderstood, as defending the editorial management of the Globe. I sec with regret many attacks on persons lor matters that ought not to be brought before the public. means of defence he disdained to use, but if I detest all investigation of the private transac heres one Georgian, one radical, who regrets the part he took on: that transaction, I thank Jkd, to me, he is unknown, I trust, sir, that t atone for his own error in defending what he new insinuates wis wrong,. he does not," under the power of some master feeling, intend to ensure every thing that is right. -Mr- Cobb and Mr. Crawford have been named by the Senator. 'Mr. Cobb is no longer among ji3; to answer. He did his duty, according to his conception of that duty, in this and every other act of his public life. His friends know dat his conduct was open, and his motives pure. sThc ground he stood upon here, he never aban doned while he lived.4 Mr. Crawford, I am surprised the Senator should think, (Mr. Mil Izr) said he alluded to Mr. Crawford (Joel) a 'member of the housjj q representatives when the Seminary question was agitated. I am f lad to be corrected. Mr. Joel Crawford acted with his friends and is, guilty of the charge of having voted lor enquiry into the beminole war. Iff lives to remember, not to retrret that act. Ti'his Union party, which seems to haunt his imagination, if I am not strangely mistaken, had the honour, a short time since, to number him os a member of it, (Mr. Miller denied that -he had ever been.) Well, sir, the Senator ought ro know: but in this fact, I cannot be mistaken -the Senator was a candidate, brought forward by that party for the state government and the cause of postponing for two years the ele vation of the accomplished gentleman who now stands ct the helm of her affairs. The rccol lection of that fact should have prevented i charge against them of selfish motives, love of office, devoted to the dominant power: following like the, sun-flower, the mo tions of the risen sun. Tothis last charge, I $o not plead for them, not guilty they do fol low, like the sun-flower -thq sun-flower does not change its attitude for the rising, or the me ridian, or the setting sun. Elevating its broad free to the light of heaven, it stands unchanged, und is found when he sets in the western, as it stood when he rose in the eastern sky. Poeti JSSS icL?tood' as Ovid describes the helio- F V.t tenator is "got (what is good in jioet- that kr y3 g00d & Pf ) and the charge mfrlnd?v Tle ih South Carolinians, fef C natornow no will but eauh110 his thistle. Wc are Uught to expect shoals of them here. :rr ui,uev?u, honors and of. them urie rrinre unfortunate. Who find : . '7 ' x -rr-;'?'r19 ine een- tions, all malignant scrutiny into the every day business of political aspirants. Their private characters are known to the people; and so far as character should operate to their prejudice, it will be weighed. Even the defensive recri minations of the Globe deserve censure. But, Sir, I do not admit that Mr. Van Buren r the I administration, is responsible for the lighter of fences much less the enormities of any news paper writer -even for the Globe, which, black as the gentleman may consider it, is as pure as this unsullied sheet, compared with the jour nals that are published by its side. But does the Senator mean to assert that every one who aids in the establishment of a newspaper, is res ponsible for its enormities ? Will the Senator consent that his friends and all his opponents shall be judged by the same rule? I ask him to glance his eye back over the history of the press in this District for a few past years. Does he remember the Federal Republican, the Wash ington City Gazette, the Washington Repubh- can i jjoes ne Know any inmg oi me national Journal and the United States Telegraph ? Has he present to his recollection the atrocious calumnies by which they have been polluted their dark insinuations and open falsehoods, by which the reputation of the virtuous of both sexes has been wantonly and grossly assailed ! Slander has flown still flies to all corners of our country, as if borne on the wings of the wind. If. all these things are present to his view, will he admit that those who patronised these journals were participators f those hate- lui crimes f Can we trust the renutation and shall be judged by his own rule. Then God help the Senators friend's ; for they are beyond all human aid and so are those who patronize and support, in times of high party strife, a tho rough-bred partizan newspaper. Leaving to others to adopt or reject the rule, and to apply it or not to the patrons and supporters of the Journal and the leiegraph, and to the former patrons ot the Washington Republican, the Washington City Gazette and Federal Repub lican, I deny, explicitly, Mr. Van Buren's res- ponsioihty lor any article ot the lilobe. it the Senator, will produce satisfactory proof that he has been instrumental in establishing a press here or elsewhere, for the purpose of dragging down, by calumnies any good man s name, my vote shall damn him herc my voice every where. In the spirit of manly kindness, not in the spirit of this discussion, I appeal to the Sena- tor to reflect upon the irreconciieaDie contra diction between all his conclusions to Mr. Van Buren's prejudice, and the character of the President with his present friends and the peo ple, but according to his own conceptions of that character before the President had the misfortune to think that Ihe Senator and his friends were pursuing a policy dangerous to the union of the States. He was, as descnoea by the Senator, all that was good and great, and performed with the purest patriotism, more important services than any man since the days of Washington. His known firmness has been " . called obstinate self-will, by his adversaries, and he has been held up by his enemies as a roaring lion, requiring implicit obedience from all who ventured to approach his den. lake the good or the bad of this description. Judge this matter by the opinion of the President's friends, by the Senator's, or by the President's enemies, and the part allotted to Mr. van Bu ren could not have been plaved here. What, Sir, this pure patriot, this great public bene factor, this self-willed, obstinate man, this roar- inff lion, to be a wet rag in any man's hands ; a nose of wax to be pinched into any and eve ry shape by Mr. Van Buren's fingers! 11 the Senator will calmly reflect, he will be compel led to acknowledge that he is or has been great ly mistaken. The President is not what he declared him to be what his friends or his enemies believe him to be, or else flagarant injustice has been done to Mr. Van Buren. I will not quarrel with the Senator's choice. He may take either branch of the alternative. He cannot hold both. The formidable array of facts in support of his charge of corrupt management against Mr. Van Buren, reminds me of an occurrence said to have happened in France. There is it sefcms such a thing as an action to recover damages for seduction, which may be brought by an unfortunate lady who has listened too credul ously to a flattering tongue. A pretty lady who had' quaralled and parted with her lover called on an advocate to bring a suit for the damages she had sustained. She described the origin and progress of the liason, the happiness enjoyed while it lasted, and the time of its dura tion, and then its fatal end. The advocate listened withprofoundattention to thcstory,?&, saw jthnt it was one of those cases in which it was difficult to say who was in fault, the gentleman or the lady, and that an action could not be maintained for se duction. How to convey this, without offending the fair oho was the difficulty. All Frenchmen, of all professions, avoid that as the deadliest of sins. The advocate managed it with the prover bial skill of hie profession and of his country. Madam, it would give me infinite pleasure to obey your wishes and punish" the ihgrato who has separated himself from so much beauty; but I am obliged to tell you that the facts are not sufficient to support an action. This . seemed very strange to the lady, as she had been very minute in her detail of all the facts. Pouting and petulant she left the advo cate to his books and briefs. .The whole affair was forgotten by him; but in the course of a few days the lady burst triupmhantly into his room, exclaiming with joyful eagerness, another fact, he seduced me again this morning. ; And so it is with the feenator. His lacts, like the lady's, do not go to the point he must reach to effect his purpose. Each one is like unto the other, and all like the seduction of that morning. Prom the National Intelligence. TO THE EDITORS. Gentlemen : Please to give a place in your paper of to-morrow (if practicable) to the en- . . of the Administration, I subnm wauuory, icwo, me toIlorinr closed statement, and you will greatly oblige Your obededicnt servant. S. SMITH, 12th February. 1832. with the views i ted. - on the 25! resolution : "That the Committee on Commorce fc. structed to enquire into he expediy 4. amending the act of March 1st, 1$23, oms to J? inuntc iuu i:iwiucui u wrunuea States t remove the dicrimmaiig duties now imp08ed In a speech of Mr. Clay's madein the Senate on British vessels trad their cargoes, upon thc;. and reported in the Intelligencer of the 30th entry from ahy British American possession'. January last, that gentleman stated. " It (the whenever he shall have been officially informed hill for meeting the British act of Parliament) that American! vessels and their cargoes are i brought before Congress in me seb&iuu ui i uac -luauucr aimueu miuwcunugn AmeiiCaa was an the act of Parliament, upon opening this trade to the countries not possessing Colonics. I am, &c. C. C. CAMBRELENG. Hon. S. SImith, of Maryland. It might jhave been added in ray remarks that the u motion" was not spontaneous on im part, but w;as the necessary consequence of a (I CORRECTED EVERY TUESDAY. v.l "do do. f'. do. do. fnisis. foreign mi?sinnc r ,.v,. iv.p bcinc already before us. as'th . : inem en tlecoan at whom this arrojnr has been cast, the fitst of the shoal of officevseekers! Vhv! Rir the Senator himself speaks highly of his charar. let. uescnoy ms coueague, ne is a high plained, and then said,-as to the public press, rcinjcd man, of extensive information and un-lthc Senator consents that he and his friends honor of his friends to the application of his own rule ? (The Vice President asked, if the Senator from Georgia had any allusion to the occupant of the chair? Mr. Forsyth. By what aumoriiy, oir, ao you ask that question? The Vice President said the allusion anoearr.l to he so direct, he had a right to ask the question. air. rorsym. i aeny the right, and if it is con sidered as a question of order, I anneal to thp judgment of the benate. The Vice President said if the allusion was directed to him. there was no foundation for it. Mr. Miller rose and addressed the Chair. Mr. Forsyth claimed the floor, which he said he was in some danger of loosing between the Chair and the Senator. The Vice President said the Senator from Geor gia is entitled to the floor. Mr. Forsyth. That being understood, I give, way with pleasure to to the Senator for any explanation he may de sire to make.) ' , , , , , Mr. MILLER explained, ana conciuaea by saying as to. the rule by which he judged oth ers in r.elation to the omciai press, hc was ru ling that it should be applied to himself and his friends. Mr. Forsyth reDlied to an argument as ex- ' Mr. Brown, on the conclusion ofMr.Havnc's remarks, adjured parties not to pursue this drt cussion: it could lead to no good. Every one's mind was no doubt made ;un. Let us vote, and avoid any further irritation, alreadv voo groaion mis suDjcct. Mr. Brown, on the conclusion of Mr. Hayne's remarks, adjured parties not to pursue this discussion: it could lead to no good. Every one's mind was no doubt made up. Let us vote, and avoid any further irritation, alredy iou great, on mis suDjeci. Mr. Forsyth said, I am aware of the proprietv of the suggestion of the gentltman from North Carolina, and do not rise to continue the dis cussion. The gentleman who has iust takpn his seat (Mr. Hayne) has expressed his opinion ne win oi course act upon it that is his affair he has founded it on sources within his HH8C9UUJ i-cs uru noi uisciosea we cannot speak of them. No evidence other than that al ready betore the public has been referred to by wiiij. y e cuimui examine wnat we do not see. ah tnis is lor thejudgment of others. The hon orable Senator has said, that the course he has taKcn in coming to his conclusion, was sugges tea oy the iriends of Mr. V. B. This! must deny. The suggestion of that course was maae by the Senator from Massachusetts (Mr. vveoster) who is not to be numbered among uie inena8 ot the Derson norninntP itK a V1UIV1 politically or personally. . Although believing investigation unnecessary, we have stood ready, at all times, to vote for it in any form not dis graceful) to the Senate The whole question will soon be before the public, and we are ready to abide by the result. Aft lOO& ft at thfl instance OI Uie AWCUMU tuwmai licp wi iudcedmotion of the gentleman from Maryland, notef Mr. ClyV which he had requested y0n (M?. Smith,)" fcc. ' to shew me, gating, according to my recolIec. In mv reply, I made the following remarks : uon, uih wpen ne nau coaierrea withmef ve "Before 1 finish my remarks, Mr. President, had expressed an opinion in favor of legis. "I will notice what passed between we " "i'"""7"v"""uu8niitWouij "Secretary ofS.tate, (Mr. Clay,) and mysen, m uc w . u y "egoUition. "relationto theactoi raniament oi juij, b . iiasa "I first saw a copy of that act m Baltimore, anu uuuuu.4uC8,.uu,u snould Wjs. "mentioned it to the Secretary, ne buu -v, .v auiese. T "he had the act in his possession, ana nanaeu ncva uu, """""J11 made to . i a a at w m m aTw w n f a m r w w 1 1 w ah a . nit n mo T nslipd him. whether tne terms urn iiixia f lc ovuiiauiauam. , "proposed were satisfactory. He said that he question theii was, whether the trade, accordini " considered they were all we could ask. l men to tne nupuiduuiu ui u, juuia be secured "observed, why not issue a proclamation un- oy ucguuy j e.u.-.. iriyimpres. "Aor. n.t and ihiis nnen tne traae.' ne siou wa, u at "Kress nrommU "replied, that he would prefer negotiation. I rescinding the restrictions of the act of March, Lwiv? fnr what will vounecrotiate? 1823, would have been immediately folW "We have nothing to-do, but to give our assent, by such an order in Council as was requiredby " and the trade is at once opened, i naa uiu sut o a3 was requiredby " act printed, and handed a copy to Mr. Aaams, t Vipfnrp. He agreed " that the terms were satisfactory. I then pres " sed him to issue his proclamation, and told "him that if he did not, I should be compelled "to introduce a bill. He remarked, that he "unshpd I wnnlri do AO. and that he would not nnlv sifm it. but siVn it with treasure. I did highly respectable portion of my constituents. " Drenare a bill, under the order of the Senate, which memorial was ultimately, on motion of " and, doubtful whether it might be correctly Mr. Mazelwell, referred to the Committee "drawn, bo as to effect my object, 1 sent it to oi rinance, py wnose oruer me uui was repor "the then Secretarv of State (Mr. Clav,) with tea. a request that he would correct it if necessary, He replied in writting, to this effect: " that NEWBERN PRICES CURRENT the bill was drafted to meet my object, that it was so doubtful whether it were best, to act by a law, or by negotiation, that it was indif ferent which course should be adopted. In answer to these, there appeared the fol lowing note, appended to a speech of Mr. Clay, and published in the Intelligencer of the 9th instant: " There is a statement in the published " speech of Gen. Smith, which if he made it in " the Senate, did not attract mv attention. " He says he asked me whether the terms pro posed bv the British act of Parliament of "July, 182&, were satisfactory; and that I " said I considered they were all wc could " 4 ask.' Now, I am perfectly confident that the Senator's recollection is inaccurate, and " that I never did say to him that the terms " proposed by the act were all we could ask. " It is impossible I should have said so. ' For, " colonial (and of course the United States) to " its privileges, those Powers arc required to " place the commerce and navigation of Great " Britain (European as well as colonial) upon " the footing of the most favored nation. That " is, if we had accepted the terms as tendered " on the face of the act, wc would have allowed " have granted by our treaties of reciprocity " with Guatemala and other Powers. Theves "sels of Great Britain, therefore, would have "been at liberty to import into the United otates, on an equal looting with our own, the productions oi any part of the globe,, without a corresponding privilege on the part 4 of our vessels, in the ports of Great Britain. It is true that the King in Council was autho- " rized to dispense with some of the conditions " of the act, in behalf of Powers not possesing 'colonies. But whether the condition, eni- " bracing the principle of the most favored na tion, would have been dispensed with or not, " was unknown to me at the time the Senator " states the conversation to have happened. "And, long after, Mr. Vaughan, the BritisTi Minister, was unable to afford any informa " tion as to the act of Parliament. That verv "authority, vested in the. King, demonstrates "tho n r-i . r 4 h.n m. r ". . 1 "V'I-djiij uinc was ior luriiier expiana "tion, if not negotiation. " With respect to the note from me to the "Senator, which he says he received accomna "nying the draft of the bill introduced by him. , M . -ill - W - ' -it wouia oe more satislactory if he would pub- "iisn tne note itsell, instead of what he repre- sents to be an extract. H. C." All my papers being in Baltimore, it has not been in my power to ascertain whether I have preserved the note alluded to, and the purport or " effect" of which, I had undertaken to give from memory. I therefore addressed a note to Mr. Cambrbleng, who was a member of the Committee of Commerce in the House of Repre sentatives at the time, to enquire whether he Itnsl V 1 -.1 . nau uttu any cuiiiniunication eitner vernal or written, with Mr. Clay, on the subject. The following is his answer, which, as it appears to me, clearly, fully, and substantially sustains the statements made bv me. from recollection: ' Washington, 11 Feb. 1 832. J Dear Sir: I have your note of this date in quiring whether I had any written communica tion with Mr. Clay, when Secretary of State, on the subject of the act of parliament of July, 1825. After the passage of that act, the Comptroller of the Customs of Hallifax, Nova Scota, con strued its provisions as applicable to vessels of the United States in that trade, and I had oc casion to call Mr. Clay's attention to that fact. That construction was afterwards overruled, by an order of the Colonial Government of the 23d of January, 1826. Having brought the act of Parliament to the consideration of Mr. Clay, I suggested the propriety of reciproca ting its provisions, in order to prevent the inter diction of our commerce with the British West Indies. I stated to him my intention of mo ving a resolution upon the subject, unless it should interefere with some arrangement of Govern ment. I understood Mr. Clay as assenting to the property and necessity of adopting some curuwi measure, ana as expressing a desire BEESWAX, lb. - - BUTTERj do. CANDLES, do. COFFEE, do. CORN, bbl. quantity, CORN MEAL, bushel, CORDAGE, cwt. -COTTON, do. COTTON BAGGING, Hemp, ; i Flax, FLAX, lb. FLOUR, Rochester, bbl. , Baltimore, do. , North Carolina, do. IRON, Bar,vAmerican, lb. Russia & Swedes, do. LARD, lb. LEATHER, Sole, lb. Dressed, Ncats do. Calf Skins, dozen, LUMBER, Flooring, 1 J inch, M. .- Inch boards, - do. ' . j Scantling,; - do, Square Timber, do Shingles, Cypress, do "i . Staves, w. o. hhd. do, Do. RED OAK, do Do. w. o. bbl. Heading, hhd.. Do. bbl. MOLASSES, gallon, NAILS, Cut, all eizee above 4d. lb 4d.and3d. - no wrought, - - do NAVAL STORES, Tar, bbl. ! Turpentine, do. i Pitch, do. Rosin, do. j Spirits Turpentine, gall. Varnish, - do. OIL, Sperm. - - do. Whale & Porpoiee, do. Linseed, - - do. PAINTS, Red Lead, lb. White Lead, ground in oil, cwt PROVISIONS, Bacon, lb. Hams, do. I . Beef, bbl Pork, mcGs, do. Do. pricpe, do. Do. carffo, do. SALT, T. Island, bushelquantity. j Beaufort, do. (none.) i Liverpool, fine, do. SHOT,! cwt. SPIRITS, Brandy, French, gall. AppleBrandy, do. Peach do. do. Rura, Jamaica, do. Do. windward Isl'd do. Do. New England, do. Gin, Holland, do. Do. American, do. Whiskey, do. STEEL, German, - IbJ English, blistered, do. SUGAR, Loaf. - do. 9 Lump, - Brown, TEAjImperial, jGrunrxnvder, ! Hyson, Black, TALLOW, Madeira, Teneritie 17 18 20 22 12 18 13 14 1 75 2 GO 14 10 8 40 8 65 14 18 12 13 8 0 7 00 7 50 6 50 7 5 5 53 3 8 9 25 1 50 9 22 00 30 12 14 8 10 8 0 17 2J 1 25 1 ST 18 8 10 8 10 18 8 10 25 80 8 9 0 15 00 1 50 1 i 55 I 50 30 25 90 35 .5) I 00 120 15 15 18 6 6J 8 8 9 12 10 50 WINE POST-OFFICE, j Newbcrn, Ihth Feb. 1632. I r tT llorse aiau between irenton and cm r6"1 haying been discontinued, the Mails for Dunlin ami enmT1-nrt jnnntUrill future be forwarHoTCu w i . L Fai measure, ana as expressing a desin on FwAv 7 wfiS1 ?3 at.ConSress wouldactupon the subjlct. Be J on I naa . T. WATfcON, P. iicving that I was acting entirely in accordance - do. - do. - do. - do. do. - do. do. - gall. do. 1 J 40 50 75 45 70 20 90 40 25 45 88 15 12 16 14 7 50 30 80 8 60 50 50 40 13 18 15 0 I 80 ! 50 1 0 3 50 2 CHARLESTON PRICES CURRT February & inn vvimn v inferior to good . . . . . . Corn .j . . Peas .1 . . Bacon i-Corn Fed ........ Hams .50 Lard Tar Wilminffton Turpentine Wilmington, hard Do . 1 ' . . do soft A 1 45.a! 3 a .9a" if a H 2400 my xttg v v ...nnflniiv informs public that she has removed to in convenient House on Craven-btrc formerly occupied by Col. Tisdale, where is preplared to accommodate transient and p l . i .i x market manent uoaraers wnn tne oesv vur .---; ,c fords. parents and Guardians residing in countrir and who may wish to procure d . for thefr children or wards in Town, are isur that, il placed under her care, every exc :r will be used to promote their comfojt and n?- venienjce. Tan.