Newspapers / Newbern Sentinel (New Bern, … / March 14, 1832, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of Newbern Sentinel (New Bern, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
TOUT El jOA-IBMML IttA . SEH'Jd IlfciB tti : 1 if . f 4 : r " -. si : 4 - ' : ',71 t .- ; A 1 X J . -I '-Jr .1 I ' I i i - - F 1 1 W 4 i 8w the NeYkMeiknJtaMWistr il " SPEECH OF AbjtJANT 5EN. DIX. f The Address delivered by General Dix, at ihe recent meeting in Albany, is admirable for he justness of its sentiments, and the purity of its 6tyle. It is rarely indeed that we meet with so chaste and beautiful a composition in a speech on political topics. We regret that our limits do not permit us to copy this production entire, but we refer our readers to its perusal, as pre senting in a clear light, and in perspicuous Ian guage, the controversy in relation to the cele. bratqd Colonial question. j ine loiiuwujg ocyicutca we copy ana WC ! hardly do justice to their ! eloquent author by severing his argument as presenting this long j mooted question under an aspect not to be mis understood. " It is a remarkable cirenrristance. that on he 9 th February, 1818, the committee of Fo reign Relations fin the IIousc of Representa tives (the first Congress after the organization of Mr. -Monroe's Cabinet) reported in favor of additional restrictions upon the colonial inter course of Great Britain with us; and, in assign ing the grounds of their recommendation, they referred to a document marked F. which had been furnished to them by Mr. Adams as Sec retary of State. Mr. Adams also referred to it : himself in a letter to Mr. Rush, dated on the UiTd of June," 1823, while the latter was Minister fo Orc.it Britain, and distinctly pointed his at tention to it as a guide. The position assumed by that paper and sought to be maintained by u long and elaborate argument is contained in the following query: "Can Great Britain slip port her West India Colonics in comfort, or even in "safely, without supplies from the -.United States?" to which it is confidently answer ed, and the grounds of the opinion assigned, that," she cannot" and the conclusion is very legitimately drawn that we could prescribe1 our own terms with her. This position affords a flue to the whole course of poliey pursued by Mr. Adams and Mr. Clay on that subject. 5 Be lieving that those colonies were dependent on "an intercourse with us, they were willing to gain credit for ability as negotiators by availing t tliemselves of the necessities of Great Britain, and insisting on advantages which they should have seen could never be obtained. As soon as the policy, of which, that paper vas the ground work, wasi understood, it became the subject of an animated discussion in the British Parliament. J Mr. Huskisson on the floor of the House of Commons in the year 1825, said he was persua- dedan impression existed on our part that Great Britain had yielded that intercourse to neces sity,5 and that, as her colonics could not subsist without it.'wc might prescribe the conditions under which it should be carried on; and he ' concluded by recommending counteracting mea sures. This was the language of the man, who of all others in Great Britain had most ardent ly and ably advocated a relaxation of hcY colo nial restrictions, who was reproached by the monopolists with the design of overthrowing the established order of things, and of settingup a system of entire freedom in commerce. When the most liberal if not the most enlight ened statesman in Great Britain spoke in lan guage so unequivocal, it is not surprising that the act of interdidction referred to, was resort ed to during the following year. That Mr. Clay was a party to the course of policy which that measure was designed to counteract, is apparent from the fact that he was a member of Mr. Adams' cabinet for more than a year while it was steadily persisted in, and that he had uni formly sustained it on the floor of Congress. Such was the character of the policy, by means of which these giants in diplomacy proposed, not to gain by reasoning and argument, but to coerce a power on friendly terms with us, to concede what could only be obtained oh the ground of her necessities. That the grounds on which they had placed their demands were in their own estimation untenable, is apparent irom the fact that Mr. Gallatin was sent out in the year 1820 with instructions to abandon them and to accede to certain propositions made bv the British government in the year 1624 the most favorable ever offered for our acceptance -but declined until that time, either from a cuj ablc neglect of the public interests, or what js more probable, an expectation of obtaining great er advantages. It is not to be doubted that this change of policy was the result of a con viction on their part, at which they had however arrived too late, that the position assumed in document F could not be maintained, and that if they would not agree to share with Great Britain the trade with her West India colonies on reasonable terms, she would find means to dispense .altogether with our direct agency in supplying them. If the position were founded in reason and justice, it ought not to have ben abandoned ; if ir bad not such a foundation then had Messrs. Clay and Adams been insisting for years on concessions which could not be obtained, and which I we ought not to have de manded. Mr. Clay says in his apology to the senate for his vote against Mr. Van Buren, that we had, during two administrations previous to that oi Mr. Adams, preferred the same claims. The only difference between his statement and the fact, is, that wc had previously to Mr. Mon roe's administration sought as a privilege, (aye, ; sir, as a privilege the term runs through the whole history of our j negotiations on the sub r ject) what Messrs. Clay and Adams had demand ed as a right. The instructions addressed to previous negotiations .were to obtain it! if they could---.thpse framed under the direction of Mr. Adams arid Mr. Clay, to insist on it as a "sine quarion of a definitive arrangement." j ue jouowing reference to the dignified po ssum assumed by President, in regard to cur foreignrelations, b a. merited tribute to ihe aracter of the man, and to the policy of his ad ministration. j ' " It was flue to the character nf it,- a L ! people that this course of the last administratiol) that pretensions already disavowed by the neo p!e in the judgment pronounced upon the ad ministration of Mr. Adams, should if necessary" be distinctly disavowed in behalf of those! how leading maxim is to a?k nothing which is - not right, and to submit ta-nothifig which is wrong, a ainereni course would have been a virtual endorsement of errors and abuses, which Gen. Jackson was elected to correct and reform. The frankness and plain dealing of General T 1 1 1 . i . . . 0 jacKson in an ms public acts are m harmony with his own character, with the character of the people of the United States, and with the genius of our political institutions. It has se cured from foreign states all that we hare ask ed; and it has elevated us in the eyes of the world, by examining the example of a great nation introducing into her discussions with foreign states the same freedom, and acting upon the same maxims, which should charac terize and guide the conduct of honorable indi viduals in their j personal relations with each other." ' j "The idea presented by Messrs. Webster and Clay, that Gen, Jackson has, through Mr. Van Buren's instructions, humbled himself at the foot of tho British throne, is, to say the least. but a sorry compliment to the intelligence of tne American people it was perhaps, not to be expected that gentlemen accustomed to rely, for the accomplishment of results. uDon a skil ful, uscof the weapons of diplomacy, should be cafpablo of doing justice to an honorable frankness which disdains to employ them. But thatj-jen. Jackson, erect as he stands before the nation and the world, with all his historical associations about him. in an attitude of digni ty which only one man before him has been able toassume-that such a man should involve his country's reputation or his own, by casting off the miserable guises of diplomacy, is draw ing ramer too presumptuously even upon the credulity of their own lollowers. The closing passages which we must omit for want of room contain a bitinsr "rebuke' orithe conduct of the principal actore in the Senatorial scene. MR. WEBSTER, AND HIS DIGNITY AND HONOR. In Mr. WcbsterVsecond speech on the no mination of Mr. Van Buren he said, " For one, I never saw the instructions nor iibard them read till January, 1831 ; nor did I ever hear them spoken of as containing these obnoxious passages." We have before exposed the utter improba bility of this defence by the most irrefragable deductions; we will now expose its falsity ef fectually, by proof. In the report ofhe proceedings of the Se nate of the 29th May, 1830, in the National In telligencer, of May 30, it is said "Mr. Wood bury reported! the bill authorizing the Presi dent to issue the proclamation without amend ment," and, "after some time spent in Execu tive business the Senate, on motion by Mr. Woodbury, proceeded to consider that bill, as in Committee of the Whole; and after it was read, the doors were closed on motion by Mr. Woodbury. When the doors were opened, the bill was read a third time and passed." What does the reader suppose was the ob ject of closing the doors while the bill was un der consideration! Why plainly to read with closed doors the instructions and correspon dence, which had been confidentially commu nicated, on the call of the Senate. There was no change of subject. The Senate closed their doors, on motion of the Chairman having charge of the bill, to hear in secret what could not be publicly read. Did the Senate go through the formality of clearing their; galleries and closing their doors, and then not read the documents, the reading of which was the only purpose of closing them? No. Mr. Foot, Mr. Webster's friend and ally, in his speech against Mr. Van Buren's nomination, said "In fact, for myself no evidence of what my duty would require on an occasion like the present, has been wanting, since the letters of instruction to our Minister to Eng land WERE READ IN THI8 BODY, NEARLY TWO YEARS SINCE, AND WHICH I THEN PRONOUNCED DISGRACEFUL TO THE COUNTRY." Now here were the instructions read in the Senate, in immediate connection with the bill, and tha "obnoxious passages" pronounced by u ocnaior. ' If Mr. Webster was present he must " hnv heard them read." That he was present, the reader will perceive by turning to the same repon in tne intelligencer, by which it appears that, after disposing of the colonial bill, the Senate immediately passed to the bill reducing the duty on salt, and the ayes and nays being taken, Mr. Webster's name is recorded in the negative. - Present in the Senate when the instructions were audibly read on the 19th May, 1830, and "these ob noxious passages" pronounced "dis graceful to the country," and yet gravely avers that "HE NEVER HEARD THEM READ TILL JAN UARY 1831;!!! "honor and DIGNITY ! ! shame upon it, Mr. Webster, shame upon it ulobe. tt te11? of Englandwiththe United States. Under this head the New York Courier and and inquirer has the following remarks, which are worthy of attention. p Utei London Times (Dec- 30 1831) the IT Stniteltttl0ns belween England and the nfnl made the subJect of "tide, v . point, a vervcurious concession ,s made in the Time. - by statin " Ufas the opinion of intelligent sionate men that the letter of the treaty of . 0 owjuuice, appears to be more favorable to America, but its spirit arid the necessary meaning of the parties who signed it to be obviously on the side of this England country." The known connexion between the London Times and the Whicr ministry now in power, give a more than usual importance; to this declaration. An acknowl edgment of the legal and internal right in the United States,' controlled only hy the obvious necessities of the colonies for an internal com munication, presents us at once with the " van tage ground" in the negotiation. It is very evident that up to the close of last year, the most conciliatory .'spirit existed in the British government to arrange the controversy on amicanie Terms on sucn terms as would be satisfactory to Maine and the Union. In regard to the Right of Search the most important the most ?ital the most exciting question between the two countries the Times briefly and pointedly says "tt ought to have been settled in 1815." This is true 'it ouffht to have been settled in 1815.'' Why was it not? Perhaps the people of this country, recollecting the part a certain presidential candidate took in the negotiations of that Deriod,' might be disposed to put the question to Henry Ulay and wait a while for an answer. It is singular to observe however, that the same negociator whose mind gave a direction to maturing of the Treaty of Ghent, and who availed himself of that opportunity to neglect what should have been settled, should as a member of the Senate, again interpose his " malign influence," by organizing a party to reject the Minister specially instructed to finish in 1832, the negotiations begun but not ended in Uhent in 1815. The unfavorable effect of Mr. Van Burens rejection upon the English Cabinet in relation to both unadjusted points can scarcely be esti mated at this early period To the state of Maine we much fear it may be a deplorable event. In the very midst of an important and delicate negotiation, what an absurd and suici dal course has been pursued by her two Sena tors, in joining their votes with others to dis grace the able minister who was actively en gaged in procuring a recognition of their rights oi jooundary f or the nrst time since the acknowledgment of our independence, the two freest and greatest eounties in the world, were almost within sight of making a final ad justment of all causes and sources of irritation, when a violent taction in the U. S. Senate, dashed the cup of hope to the ground, and rudely endangered the relations of the country. We cannot but lament it now the people will remedy it hereafter. J COPY. Washington, Feb. 18th, 1832. To Silas E. Burrows, Esq. My Dear Sir I take pleasure in complying with your request to be permitted to take with you to New-York, for the Centennial birth day, the sword and pistols of General Washington, and I accordigly commit tt your care those valued relics of my venerated relative. My father, by the will of General Washing ton, had the first choice of the swords bequeath ed by him to his nephews, with the injunction " never to draw them except in self defence, or in defence of their country." The sword which I have placed in your hands was presented by Fredrick the 2d, King of Prussia, accompanied by the compliment, "From the oldest General in the world to the greatest." 'The pistols were bequeathed to me by my un cle, the late Judge Washington. They be longed to the General, and were used by him during the revolutionary war. I request your acceptance of a piece of the mahogany Coffin, which until May enclosed the remains of General Washington ; at that time we removed his remains with those of the oth er members of the family from the old vault, to a new one, built on the spot selected by him self, and in which he had requested that he and his relations should be entombed. The leaden coffin was in perfect preservation, but that which covered it was in a state of decay, and a new one was substituted. I feel assured that this relic will be accepta ble to you, by the evidence you have given, not in professions, but by your generous design of shewing your veneration for the son, by your respect for the mother, in rescuing from oDiivion tne spot wnere nor nonored but neg lected remains are deposited. I would have loaned you General Washingtons Diplomas from various Societies, and his commission, had it occurred to me. I am Dear Sir, with great respect and esteem, yours GEORGE VI WASHINGTON. PROPOSALS BY ROBERT NESB1TT & JAMES C WALKER. TJ- ui- u: i t- 1 , t- ur jjuuiiKumg m uic vyiiy ui iviciimona, a new Religious Newspaper, to be called the RICHMOND EVANGELIST. ETHELBERT DRAKE, Editor. AT an age like the present, when Clirinlianity is as sailed by tHe skeptic, and infidelity, io various forma and under different modifications, has erected r standard against the truths of Revelation, every lawful means should be resorted to to protect the " Sacramental Host" from unhallowed profanation, and to disseminate those glorious truths thai make men wise unto salvation. When we look at the extensive character of the work now carrying' on through this contineM, and consider the means the Great Head of the Church has ble.sed, we are constrained to admit that the time has arrived, in the which, he that is at ease in Zion, will be cut off from the promises of God, and bear the mark of reprobacy from the blessings of the Everlasting Covenant. The multiplication of Religious Jourpals at this time, must present pleasing expectations to the minds of a Christian public, and furnish the Minister of the sanctoarv with a powerful auxiliary in the cause of Gospel Truth. And in our own city ; yea (broughout the limits of the Virginia Conference, one of the character proposed, must awake a deeep interest in the minds of a large portion of the religious community. The Evakoblist wilt be more particularly devoted to the dissemination and defence of the doctrines of the Methodist Kfiscopal Church: and will not only give the earliest intelligence of all matters connected with that growing communion, but will also be devoted to the com mon cause of Christianity ; following the delightful plans of peace, we shall not only endeavor tn cultivate, but incul cate the great principles of Christian charity, without which we are nothing more than sounding brass or a unKiing cymoai. 1 nougn protesseaiy the advocate of the doctrines of the Methodist Episcopal Crjurch, the great truths of the Bible will be inculcated by the Evangelist, anwawed by party rage or bigotted zeal. We shall at no time admit into our columns that kind of controversy calculated to widen the breach between denominations but only such as will have a tendency tb elicit truth fnr w are satisfied that friendly controversy is not only cal- cuiaipn in flTnni. frrrnr. nil r iriiiiuv hrm h... .1 I . v g.wicus me armour oT Truth to it Protestant Christendom owes every foot oTground it has obiaiaed ; the Reformation was itself a controversy, and the preaching of the Gospel is a cantiu ual controversy carried on with the world. Our design is to lurnish a link in the great chain which h. t Church in lhis !uarter. nd by Iing to each je joietl.gence of the work of God in various parts of fi',KrM"S' increase the spirit of uaion and render more HaVi Ch""ln fe"MWbip that at presentxists. doubt r" . verai talented contributors, we feast, and render brethren in th;e great work which lie before as, to wit i in disseminating useful knowledge, and assisting iu the es tablishment of the Kingdom of our Lord and Saviour in the earth. ' " i The EvGKtiST will be published every Friday tnorn- Ine. it will be printed on an imperial sheet and new tvne at the low price of 9 2 SO per annum, In advance or on fthe delivery of Ih first number a and wHl contain, in auUlllOO io original uiuiiuwuiMiivui ui aiotrst auti re eious subjects, notics of revivals, condensed intelligence of all movements in toe roorai ana religious world, mis siooary. Tract, Bible, Sunday School and Temperance Societies ; and all matters connected with the march of mind, and the advancement of the Church of God. Ministers and Post Ma.-ters are requested to ct as agents, and by securing- and becoming responsible for nine annual subscriber, shall receive the tenth copy gra lis. Persons sending their names as subscribers will please designate the name of the town or couuty and post office, so that no mistake may occur. The pub'ication will commence as soon as a sufficient number of subscribers ( 1 ,600) are obtained. All those who may be so kind as to take charge of subscription lists, are requested to baud them in by the drst of March, 1232. (Tr All communications to be addressed, to Nesbitt Si Walker, Richmond, Virginia.'' ' O" Persons wishing to subscribe to the Evangelist, will please leave their names with Mr. Francis Alexander, at ihe Washington Hotel. wh is authorized to act as Agnt. ADVERTISEMENT. l's Office, Newbi February 27, 183 Collector's Office, Newbern, 2. S tg5EALED PROPOSALS will be received at this Office, until the first day of April, 1832, for the supply of rations to the non-commissioned .ficers and seamen, of the United States' Revenue Cutter Dallas, for the term of one year from the said first day of April next. The ration for the Cutter service, is the same as that allowed in thq National service, and consists of the articles enumerated in the following table, to-wit ; lb. qz lbs. of Ounces of Half pints of j i Days of the 'Week. . c. c I & 3 -S S c -2 3 u c i - o. ) U 03 'Cc X a y? H JSunday, 1 14 I i i Monday, I 14 i ... 1 1 Tuesday, 2 1 14 1 i Wednesday 1 14 1 1 1 Thursday, i H 14 1 i Friday, 4 14 2 g 1 1 1 Saturday, i 14 i i J Per Week, i 0 3 i (9 i : 4 2 2 1 1 "7 v n be able to furnish a socie:r. rich intellectual our Journal pleasing to all classes of c!l n;;;a r .w-We ent'r "P.00 of PW,c labour. The number required, for the year, is cstima ted at five thousand. The proposals will state the price per ration at which the contractor will deliver them, in such quantities as may from time to time be required on board the aid Cutter at Newbern. The rations to be of good and wholesome quality,r to be approved of by the Collector; and the different articles com prising the ration to be delivered on board the Cutter in good and sufficient casks and vessels, to be provided by the contractor, and the con tents thereof distinctly marked 011 each. It ist-j be understood that the contractor will be bound to furnish, upon reasonable notice, as often as may be required by the Captain of the Cutter, with the approbation of the Collector (not exceeding upon an average, one day in each week) such fresh meat and fresh vegeta bles as may be equivalent to the corresponding parts of the ration allowed in the Naval service. 1 JAMES C. COLE, Collector. AMERICAN RAILROAD JOURNAL. THE subscriber is now publishing a weekly paper, called the AMERICAN RAIL ROAD JOURNAL. A principal object in of fering the proposed work to the public, is to diffuse a more general knowledge 01 this im portant mode of internal communication, which, at this time, appears to engage the attention of almost every section of our country. The A m erica n Railroad Journal is prin ted on a sheet of the larp-est size, (mammoth nd put un in a convenient form fnr hinrUnnr each number containing sixteen large octavo pages of three columns each. The selections, upon the subject of railroads and other works of internal improvement, will be from the best authors, both of Europe and America, and will be occasionally illustrated by engravings. A part of this Journal will oe devoted to the sub ject of internal improvement giving a history of the first introduction of railroads in England and their improvements to the present day. It will also notice the meetings, in different sec tions of tho country, upon the subject of rail roads. The remaining part of the paper will contain the Literary Miscellaneous and News matter of the NEW YORK AMERICAN, as prepared for that paper, omitting all politi cal subjects, except such as are of general con cern. , The terms of the American Railroad Journal are Three Dollars per annum, payable in ad vance; and will not be sent without. Any per son who will obtain eight subscribers and re mit the amount, shall have a copy gratis ; and to companies of ten subsribers, who associate and remit twenty-five dollars, it will be sent for $2 50 each per annum. The Journal will be sent for any length of time desired, if paid in advance. It will be published on Satur days. Letters upon the subject of the American Railroad Journal, may be addressed, free, of . postage, to tno publisher and part proprietor D. K. MINOR, No. 35 Wall-streeU New- York. MRS. KAY respectfully informs the public that she has removed to that convenient House on Craven-Street. formerly occupied by Col. Tisdale, where she is prepared to accommodate transient and per manent Boarders with the best the market af fords. Parents and Guardians residing in the country and who may wish to procure Bdard for their children or wards in Town, are asured that, if placed under her care. errv , raertinn will be used to promote their comfort and con fifACONPORK. ,LARD 50 bbls. prime Pork, Mmy, 25 mess do 50 kegs (30 to 40 lbs; each) prim e leaf LrJ 6 firkin good Goshen Butter, Fresh Hyson, (2unpo,wder and Imperial Tp 5 bbls. Lump and Loaf Sugars, ' 2 hhds. good New Orleans do. IS prime retailing Molasses, 1 tierce superior Neuvitas Honey, 12 bags prime green St Domingo Coffee 12pieces 43 inch heavy Dundee HeraolW 10 coils Bale Rope, P aglr 10 doz. " Beer V lone briffht bitt For sale by JOSEPH M. GRAN ADE,& p Dunn's Corner Newbern, March 7, 1832. cr' JOSEPH M.GRANADECT CORNER OF POLLOK- AND MIDDI.F e 1 ; , 'STREET! mAVE just received by the schooner becca from New York, and other late rivals from New York, Philadelphia and Bah" more, a general assortment of Forei"ii irn 1 Domestic DRY GOODS, IIARDvp2 and CUTLERY, QtVOCktVV, GlassiS Stone Wnxt, Groceries, Wines, &c All of which they offer for sale, at a vcrv moderate ad vance for Cash or Country Produce I The following articles may be enumerated at war. , 1 their srock ir: par,of COIjMs Pilot and .Navy Bread 10 do NY WeiteinCanul .Flour. Beach's redlraM 20 lilt bbls ditto - ditto 6 casks Goshen Cheese, 2 bpx Pine Apple ditto 12 kegs Family Butter 60 pu cs Sjnoked Beef 25 Smoked Tongues, 12 boxes Smoked Uerrin--i 6 boxes fresh bunctrRaisins 0 COO bushrls Irish Potatoes 6 barrels '.oaf and Lump Sugars White Havana and Good New Orleans Ho Imperial, Gunpowder, and Hyson TEAS Mexican and St. Domingo Coffee C hocoiale. 2 boxes fresh Madeira Naples Shiry Port Dryt Lisbon Ten?riffe I m i 30 doz quart and pint bottles Porter 2 do best refined Cider Colmannr Muscatel I Sweet Malaga Champaign? and Claret NEWBERN PRICES CURRENT. CORHECTED EVERY TUESDAY. BEESWAX, lb. - - -BUTTER, do. - -CANDLES, do. COFFEE, do. - -CORN, bbl. quantity, CORN MEAL, bushel, CORDAGE, cwt. -COTTON, do. COTTON' BAGGING, Hemp, yd. Flax, do. rLAA, In. - -FLOUR, Rochester, bbl. , Baltimore, do. ; , North Carolina, do. IRON, Bar, American, lb. Russia & Swedes, do. LARD. lb. LEATHER, Sole, lb. Dressed, Neata do. 5 Calf "Skins, dozen, LUMBER, Flooring, 1 inch, M. Inch boards, - do. Scantling, - do, Squar Timber, do. Shingles, Cypress, do. staves, w. o. hhd. do, 1 14 8 7 6 5 17 20 12 12 75 Do. red oak, da do. Do. w. 0. bbl. do. Heading, hhd. do. Do. bbl. do. MOLASSES, gallon, NAILS, Cut, all sizes above 4d.lb 4d. and 3d.. - do. wrought, - - do, NAVAL STORES, Tar, bbl. Turpentine, do. Pitch, ' do. Rosin, do. Spirits Turpentine, gall. Varnieh, - do. OIL, Sperm. - - do. Whale & Porpoiee, do. Linseed, - - do. PAINTS, Red Lead, lb. White Lead, ground in oil, cwt. PROVISIONS, Bacon, lb. Hams?, do. Boef, bbl Pork, niCFs, do. Do. prime, do. Do. carmv An SALT, T. Island, bushel, quantity, oeauiort, do. (none.) Liverpool, fine, do. SHOT, cwt. - ' . SPIRITS, Brandy, French, gall. Apple Brandy, do. Peach do. do. Rum, Jamaica, do. Do.windward Isl'd do. Do. New England, do. Gin, Holland, do. Do. American, do. Whiskey, do. STEEL, German, - lb. English, blistered, do. SUGAR, Loaf, - do. Lump, - - do. Brown, - - do. TEA,ImperaI, - - - do. Gunpowder, - - do. Hyaon, - - do. Black, - - do. TALLOW, - - do. WINE, -Madeira, - -gall. Tenerine - do. 1 22 12 8 8 17 1 15 8 8 18 8 50 14 12 8 00 50 m O H 8 25 50 00 25 28 8 0 15 90 50 50 30 25 90 35 00 15 19 22 18 13i o 60 16 9 18 15 9 7 50 y 9 3 130 11 0 20 0 1 35 20 10 10 10 '29 9 1 55 1 55 15 9 12 10 64 7 50 120 18 1 1 I! 45 40 50 75 45 70 20 90 40 25 45 38 15 12 16 14 7 50 30 80 8 60 50 7 8 9 50 8 43 50 40 18 19 15 9 1 159 , I - 3 PRICES klCHARLESTON Feb. 29. rshrunrv 28. Rice, prime. Inferior to good .... Corn . . Peas . Bacon Corn Fed . , . Hams .... . . Lard . , . . . . . . , v TarWilmington . . . ; - Do .... do .... . . eoft .... 2 a 00 , PRICES AT SAVANNAH, Feb. 28. Rice, Inferior to good, . 5 8 Corn-Retail, . . . . V. . . 53 a 55 & Bacon , . . . - . T a 8 CJ Hams . ... . . . MOalOif Lard .......... 8al0ct5 J n 2a2r 47a50 45a50 6 a8 . 9 a 10f 8 a 9 n u Ha 00 venience. Ncttbem Jan. 25. t..B cooperation and assistance of our j.
Newbern Sentinel (New Bern, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
March 14, 1832, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75