Newspapers / The Weekly Raleigh Register … / July 10, 1850, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of The Weekly Raleigh Register (Raleigh, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
- :.-;t. .-r niriiin in i t ii ""j""-" - I " ' " ' ' ' " L-.L L-.- ;- J- J .-;t-.' i--- P-MMMMMWgggggggggggg - I .nd'eon veved to the sierson claiming his1 or ber i Triww Ik thi" Qtupfmmt tea eonfimd to i that scorn and contempt Whirl, a fSr'. , . ' . ... , ,- . j- . ,, P , rri THfi REGISTER- f ii-S. -rKS5. if A the Louisiana T,rritoryl It appear, bovr. the hands of a highmL W. : 1.!' It! h i j i ' ur,.tf f vinfi er. ui w - 4 wi ac .. ; . j ho n in i MlJu en ink. . ,. ... -, . , n.-, - i , , fu9 urns tilh" . - r mi uiaTsi v w-.- rf Communications ,1 TT -J. Hinder flf THfi REGISTER; Tin Urates, OI oasweu, xxeiirj f v " . . M TJ 1 f ninntm I T TT1 1 J- r M;4: At iie llSh ;panies determinecHheUnn !5one toevelope the soU 7elt aCUte: jthe character of our State- J n ly the degraded copd.Uj to I ' land parsimony were f'Xatfveac I true to their word, and a (home and WMJ l;aodnt triumph of those Up from all sect.ons , - r hearj TasureS of liberal P0"' ' ,- . .,nn on . . n. tne Yiiiini-tv . --- a foicefrom acro tn d njt win measure Iny brave wJ". - t am sick St K he et; hs of these dirt, S SSk long to be with you SS ft.jbucUeon the armour and carry Ee banner of Internal Improvements m m. fold native State, in trmmph frojn the ilountains'- to the sea --shore There as 2SP i ponse to;a(l this one loud and universal Jt-one enthusiastic Wtttdmr! Yes " e were told in the midst of the fight that a certain great Captain was about to dash aside the glittering honors of a royal Court 2d flyto our aid and rescue. He was conn ted a valiant Knight of old renown, one who had eni-ed in an hundred hard fought bat It Vwas represented as destined to Wield a battle axe against the enem.e. of In ternal Improvements, equal m power to that ofThe far famed Cocur de Lion, against the ?J , l i r vt Well, n the com se infidel host of the Last, u eu, ..,. of Ume this great Capta.n came. He deciar 5 Si in future, his life should be devoted n thi cause the glorious cause. e nau !!ih!. LfLe done battle for pohtica repeaieqiy . w , . :h;prtnf purposes which, compareu u L Fent amb.tion, was as a mess or pot 1 ' . . ,i ui rTo was cares- what a had come was Saunders a ; dip hlance la". as uuai in . , i r, ed aattered praisea uuu ted. On his appearance, hats went up, thiin- der. of applause went round and the welkin .;tA chmik of aouroval- At the fa.t the ?reat feast given him, . uric fY hihited!! There up to it, political adversary as well as inend. There were to be seen assembled around that festive board the rich, the chivalrous, the patriotic of the land. V hen the highly res pected and venerable patriarch of the feast arose to announce the toast in honor of the renowned one, who had brought the com! any toother, every eye was intently fixed, and when he in his own iienrrous and glowing real tor the honor of his State, coupled that toast' andithe nameuihimsvhQm-ji" .SlUfUwnnnrTne-iearcause ol Internal Im provement, what deafening shouts went up and what whole souled bumpers went down ! And when the object of all this the recipi ent of so much "feast of reason," the real observed pf all observers, arose to respond to Buch an out-pouring of all the pent up foun tains of respect, and in the midst of that gush of eloquence, which he alone can equal, pro claimed that he had enlisted for the War, and would live or die with Internal Improve ment in North Carolina, there re-echoed through the streets and halls and aJongthe hillr and 'valleys of the far famed ity of Oaks, a loud, prolonged shout of approval, j compared with which the voice of the migh ty host of. Islam, when assembled on the plains of Damascus, wa- in the language of the poetic and philosophic Strange "si ent thunder I" That was indeed, an eventful day for cur native State! When that feast ended, Demociatand Whig, old and young. rich1 and poor, retired, weli pleased with ail that had been done, anJ full of the praises of the renowned Captain, '-the distinguish ed guest." The Central Road was even ihen pronounced -as good as built, "as a settled .nat ter" Mountain began to move from their bases and bow (heir lofty heads, valleys to shut their gaping mouths, the sLriil voice of the steam whistle to be heard in imag ination, in every section. .Each village of the East began to converse familia ly with ? every o ie of the West and the full granaries of the Yadkin and Catawba were already pouring their riches into the lap of other lands. The work went bravt ly on the chief battle was fought ;lhe main prize was won The far famed Captain and his gallant com peers were d -claied victor, and their brows bound with the laurel wreath. Again, that Captain went forth to battle. Hif valor and devotion to the cause, were readily endorsed by a wise council of the Ira ned and true doctrinite-'. An i rthodox morto was inscribed upon his banner. The Delphic Oiacle wasonsulted, and equivora responses came forth. The spirited charger of the great Captain occasionally stumbled, : and ilike' Napoleon on his way to Moscow, he thought he saw in it an unfavourable omen, and would fain have returned, but Destiny urged him onward Days of anxiety to his fr.ends have passed and no news of victory has come to cheer them. On the contrary rumor is busy in destroying their hopes and dampening their spirits, by whispering the melancholy story that he has been met cut offfrom the main body of his army surroun ded, captured by a handful of the enemv, his banner taken from Viim, and he made "to endorse without reserve" their 'most degra ding conditions. In the face of this most un expected and unfortunate intelligence, many - 'a stout heart has yielded to the promptings of despair; terror and dismay seem spreading .through the land. The Citadel, once the scene of that great Captain's glory, is thought to be in eminent peril. To Er est such a disaster his friends and the remaining adhe rents to his cause", have challenged Ins cap tors to one more desperate conflict, before all hope is .surrendered. That conflict is to render still more distinguished the already immortal anniversary of a great nation's birth. Let us all send up our humble and earnest prayers thatthis day, the ith of July, J. I). 1850, may be signalized by the rescue from captivity, of him, who like the illustrious LaFaye'te, braved the stormy Atlantic to do 'seruc-e m our cause ! On the plains of noiesvwe the great battle is to be fought; al ready the clash of arms is lipnr.1 hlo-f?;,, ti, breeze the plumes of the gallant combatants are waving. Terrific indeed, is the tread of those two mighty armies. Let not the sun go down upon that gory field, unless the bo- ti. ) "ft hat been rescued from i .nor in vim. I tninK I a fpw more Questions, for the . benePt of the Public. ! : V u nol.Uhnro' Teesrraph. there ...: .looionnrr that " General promised his influence, the. injlucr.ee of hu p and the prominent men in the West of bot par li"s to secure them a Charier for a Ra.l RoaJ to Newberne, and the State to tae two thirds op the Stock.'' . ' The Editor also says, "our fneads in Iew brrnwill remember this." Can it be pos lble iliat Gen. Saunders made any such promise, or pledge? II he did,, so soon as the people of INiew berae and other sections of the East, who ure in terested in theexiensionof the Central Rail Road, see his letter to the Rolesville Convention, it. behooves them to come out boldly and fix him toilh Ihe fact, that the people here may not jbe de ceived. Will they not do it? . If I am not mistaken the Rolesville Convention declared that they would not support any of the true doctrine Candidates, uolfss they endorsed tcitltout reserve" the Resolution introduced by Mr. Shepard, in the nominating Convention, and rejected, aim st wianiinoiisly. Now .Messrs. Mc Rae and Busbee made strong speeches against that Resolution ridiculing it most unmercilut- ly. ' Is it understood that Gen. Saunders hfis "en dorsed, without reserve," this Resolution? j If he has, in what a ridiculous position he has placed himself! The Resolution has been dubbed the stand still mum do-nothing fingerfin-lhe mouth Resolution? Should he be elected, and a plan for extending the Central Rail Road loj JVewberne, come before the House of Commons, (the State to take two-thirds as promised) in what a predicament will he be placed, if any meddle-;' some and uncharitable member, snould presume id call for the yeas and nays ! W hen his name is called, he will have lo respond somewhat after this fashion : "Mr. Speaker: I wisn to be ex cused from voting. I " endorsed , icilhovi res rv " the Mum Resolution. of my (riend Mr. Sliepard adopted by a Convention of my distinguished fel low-ciiizeus of the town of Rolesville,! which Convention was presided Over by the Rev. Jur well temple, a gentleman remarkable for; his en4 lightened aud patriotic devotion to the pause of mental, moral, and physical improvement. Un der this endowment " w'Uhmt reserve," I am de-, barred the privilege of voting upon this interesting and important occasion. Being ready at all times to defer to the wishes of my constituents and be ing anxious to surreuder my own opinion, whe ther right or wrong, to the superior intelligence of those who called me into political existence, I must ties the indulgence of the House, tp remain silent and amuse myself by playing with my watch seal, and ruminating over the misfortunes of poor "wdutppy Spain," until 1 can. hear from the second edition of that glorious Copvemion, which nominated tne, and is expected fa assem ble in the City Hall, somewhere between this time and the adjournment of therLegisIatiure. As my collegues are not in the habit of public speak ing, and have never visited " unhappy Spain, "t I beg leave? according to the old adage, ti kill two birds with otte stone, by asking (as tljiey are in the same h.x with my sell) thai th y also may be neraimed to remain mtui, J1 L.m-Ti piuivuea in this Hall, auy how, difficult to hear when there is so much w 1 would entreat the House, most earnestly, that, whilst this subject is under consideration, my col leagues may be permitted to go into th country, and attend to their farms, and that I may depart hence, and hold a Conference with my friend, the Red Mr. Temple, upon the remedies for the un fortunate crisis aud unhappy condition, into which the country has been driven, by ihe legislation of those, who have never had an opportunity of see ing how things are done in unhappy Spain." toir, I thank the Mouse for its pioloUna atten tion pf New Hanover, James b. snmn, "i Weldon N. Edwards, of Warren, W P-Stal" lings, of Gates, John S. Baily, jthen) of Pas quotank, besides many others jfrom all sec tions of the State Is" it possible these men could hot have secured Free Suffrage in Otat Convention, (tad they sincerely believed in the doctrine and desired to have done so ? !But, sir, the jitrangest truth yet to be told is the' fact, that! every living light of them ex cept three, vbtedfor the amended Constitu tion and thereby.expressed their opposition to Free Suffrage. Mr. Edwards I voted against the amended! Constitution and;Messrs. Biggs and Smith did not vote at all. Now for Another scrap of historv : Du ring the Legislature of 1840-41, a Bill to es tablish Free Suffrage was introduced, read the first timcf and passed. On its second reading the subject was thus summarily dis posed of. jpurnal page 434. j "The Bill to secure to thei Free "White Men of the State the right of j voting for- the representatives in the Senate jof the General Assembly, jvas read and on motion of Mr. G. W. Cald welll, laid on the tab'i." And there1, sir, that bill has slumbered from that day to this; a period often; long years has this questioji been sleeping under the kind care'of its Democratic friend, G. W. Cald well! Anl now hearanotherwonder. Will the Democratic Party wills the Free Suf fracre men believe me, when I tell them that David S. Reid, DAVID S. REID, the self constituted) champion of this measure, who is now arro. ating to himself its paternity was a member of this same Legislature, and sat coolly by and saw his bantling thus kicked in the head by one of the leaders of his own Par ty ? It is even so, sir. He was then a Senator from Rockingham and not one word said he about Free Suffrage and the Poor Man's rights ! But noV the scene changes. The Party are beaten year after year on all the old issues. They must hoist a new Hag.: They send a broad for foreign aid S. A. Douglass, of Il linois, audi Sam. Houston, of Texas, are sent on from Washington. They take up Free Suffrage as a hobby and mount Davy Reid upon it. The mandate "Hear ana ooey goes forth. Whereupon not only the little David, but all the Gulialis of the Party, shout loiid and! lustily for Free Suffrage. They were warned, in under tones, by the shrewd ones of the East, that the question otce started could never be checked or controlled in its career; but that in its legitimate and neces sary consequences, it must lead to a total change from the present basis of Represen tation in the Lcgislatuie to that of White Li)UiU.r., the uestrucuon oi mereaerai basis in the distribution of Ihe school -fund and the abolition of all property qualifications in the members of both Houses. It was hor rid to think of this. But no matter, said the leaders-the Party must do something. Ac cordingly, the followers shut their eyes and "go it bfjnd." From Cherokee to Cunituck they proclaim themselves for Free Suffrage "in any hape or any form." By the time the Legislature met, however, the spell had been broken.; I was a witness to the proceedings of the House and well re member! how the wire-workers tricd'to e vade and stave off the issue. Those from the East and Middle were! bold in their op position and moved all the time to reject, to postpone. Sec. The following instances will show : On the 15th of December '4S, a series of Free Suffrage Resolutions were introduced, when, ! j i " Mr Kelly, (a Democrat from Duplin) moved that the Resolutions be rejected " On tlje 9th of January, i'49, the Free Suf frage Bill introduced by Mr. Sheek (a Western Democrat,) being under considera tion, with the amendment proposed by Mr. Rayner calling a convention. Mr. Keen (a Democrat from Rockingham, David lieid's oxen County, and no doubt his intimate friend) moved that the Bill, w.th the amendment, be indefinitthj postponed Again, on the l'ith of January 4U, the same Bill being under consideration, Mr. T. J. Person (another Democrat) Mr. Gales : The and the barefaced misrepresi F0R THE REGISTER. vocation ot. keuj H jii;,ni nf the . . n ! .iiiw - Standard in reference to the vote o. and it is nspenng, Such, if he luts endorsed " without reterre" the Resolution, will be ihe character ol ihie Speech, he will deliver, and no doubt :i unanimous per mission to be uiuni, aud also to retire, j would be voted. But if he has not endorsed " withvpt reserve" the Resolution, pray on what position does ihe stand? Can he ask with a cleur conscience, jthe support of the advocate ol the Rolesville Con vention ? Would he be the means ot iheir falsi fying their word ? World ihey themselves, after declaring in solemn Convention, and publishing it to the World, that they icotild not support u-y man xelio does not endorse that Resolution, " with ! out reserve," falsify their own word, aj.id sustain j Gen. Saunders ? If so, then it should: be known, j for the people will then be able to place a proper estimate upon tiie proceedings of ucIIico e Conten tions, and counter Conventions, gotteia up for ef fect! If we are men, we should speak out. Again: I would ask whether there are not many respectable gentlemen, of both political par ties, who will declare, have declared, j who have certified and tcill certify , most vncquiBoeally, Uiat Geu. Samplers did say in some ol fits speeches, that ' sliould the Democratic or anulother vurtu lake ground against Internal Improvement in this moved I the indefinite postponement ol the euUgluencu age, they woutu to where they deserve to go to the DtriL l" Vou have uecUred, tuai you have in your possession certificates to mat efflft. You enquired of General Saunters, j whether their publication was called lar. l o this he has not, as 1 have heard, deign! lb make auy reply. Will he dare demasd their publica tion? It is your duly , Mr. luJitor, in jusilica tion of yourself in duty to ihe people of the county, to give these certificates, these pjroofs publicly ! toir, in what condition have we beea placed I Is it not known that the people of other sections of the Stale are visiting upon our heads, all the evils of Gen. Saunders' conduct? Tnat we. icilhoiit distinction of vartu, are to be denoun ced as close listed, stingy, selhsh, aud ungrateful, worserhan the dog in Hie manger thai we have received the benefit of nearly ihree millions of dol lars of the Stale funds, anJ that we re .disposed to refuse even a lew hundred dollars to, improve other sections ? Will not this be tliie result? Does" it behoove us to sutler the coniluct of Gen. Saunders to place us in .such an unenviable, such a Julse position, belore our tnenug of other sec tions? Is noi Gen. Saunders' act tnost unkind and ungrateful, lowads ihe liberal fuluded men, ironi ihe extremes ot ii.asi aud Went, wtio have voted such large appropriations tor works in the Centre? It becomes us, sir, to Cut ourselves loose without distinction of party from such un just suspicion, io do this, r. is necessary that we should cut ourselves loose lrouii.Gen. Saun ders, leave hun to his late, the fate which he de serves to meet, lor attempting to hjjinbug or de ceive intelligent men. If the people of Rolesville can stomach him, let them have liirn ; but it is lusulung to ask the friends ot Internal Improve ment, here or elsewhere, to support: him ! A VOTER. lereiim io i"- r-i, iner whilst in Congress, for W o -with the principle of the Wilmot Proviso incorporated in it, deserve, to; be exposed fully and fearlessly exposed. This is a sud ject on which the7 People should suffer or submit to no concealment.no deception. They should demand of those who are Can didates to carry a clean breast, to mate iun i ..... --r: -.L v;r Dast acts and anu irue comessioiis m r : present opinions in relation to this great ques tion so vitally connected with their interest and honor. Has Mr. R?i done this ? No. Has the Standard done it for him ? No. They have both attempted to deceive the public in reference to tins mauei. "r sertion is not made at random. I have the proofs before me and I submit them to the honest voters of theState that they may judge for themselves. . , In the first plaie let us see what : is the charge against Mr Reid. It is this: "That WHILST A MEMBER OF CONGRESS HE VOTED FOR THE OREGOf BILL WITH THE ODIOUS AND UNJUST PRtsCIPLE OF THE WlLMOT Proviso in it " Now what defence does Mr. Reid make to this charge so grave, so serious, so damning, in its character ? It is as follow, (I quote from his address published in the last Standard.) (.Wl.ile a member of congress I endeavoured to d here to the principles of ihe Missouri Compromise : . i i .. u:li k .... iIi.ii Knitu to pst.-ihlish a iinn wueu a uiu Tina uciui n - - - . r..,-rit,.r; ii rwirtimnt for Oresron. rouiiiiuinz ? clause inhibiiiiig shivery, in that Territory being corapi'llc-d eiihfr to vote for I he bill with thut restric tion or against extending the proieclion of our laws io tliuf dislsuil people I vptcl for ihe bill, together wiih many Southern gentlemen. Some partizun Whig'tiewspapcss have Be?7.ed on thw pretext, an'J eharsxeJ me with h:ivinff w,te.l lor the VViluiot Pru- visa. This cliw'e ii untrue, for I am, mid ever have been opposed to that Proviso, ami li-ve never voted fur it ut any time or in unj way. Th" restriction in tlto n rrinn hill ar, li.,1 in. il,..t. Terrilorv alone, nil . w . .... - - j - of w.nch lies iiorth of the Missouri C'omptowiise l:n", whereas ihe Wilinot Proviso proposes io inliibii sla very both No. tb tui'i Sou:h of timi line I voud for the Resolutions snnexing ToXs, which contained a Proviso excluding tihtvery in U tlrl pitrt of Texas. North of Ihe H ime line These Resolutions were voted for by all the Democrats from 'he South, yet in doing to wr d;J not v-jle for the Wilmot Proviso." This is his defence, and it appears to b what the lawyers wouM term ' a confession and avoidance, for he admits that he voted for the Oregon Bill with ' a clause inhibiting slavery in that Territory' but he excuses himself upon three grounds : 1. He was obliged to vote for the Bill with that clause in it, or "against extending the protection of our laws io that distant j Now let it be conceded, for the present, that the clause here spoken of, and which, it is alleged, should have rendered theBill odi ous to Jlr. Reid, was nothing DUT, a simple prohibition of slavery for all titne to come in Oregon, pray, does tins better his condition r Should such an excuse avail ith Southern men and especially with the leaders of his Part- Why look at it! It appears to ir.c, that the man is trifling with the good sense of the people. lie certainly must think his own friends more easily gulled than any set of men that ever lived. They have conten ded bereft fore that Congress had no riht to prohibit Slavery, in any Territory, that it could not Legislate on the subject, that thus to Legislate was a palpable violation of the Constitution, as well as insulting and degra ding to the South. If so, can it avail Mr. Reid to say that he voted to violate the con stitution, lor a measure that insulted, dejra- j , ,o .!.! i .i... i.:. . .:... I 1 lo ucu, iuii"tru iiic ouuui iiisuwn loiismu- ent aye, violated his own oath, 'that he might extend the protection of our laws :o a distant People : Is not such an excuse in sulting to uur undeMandings ? Vote to vio late our rights and our honor, that he might give laws to a distant people," even to Ore gon ! Vote to violate his ow?i oath, because, f.TvOoth, if the People of Oregon did not get a government, forthwith, they might be sub j cted to inconvenience. even danger and .march y ! Is this Mr. Rtid's morality. Are such lus political ethics? And there piinci- and'eanveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or service aJ aforesaid." - ! f This was the! Compromise. The line of that Compromise was 36 30', north latitude and running where ? To the Pacific Ocean : By no means, but running through " all the territory ceded by France to the U. States under the name of Louisiana." ! The Com-- yf mien urae mn flnH fo that Territory. It did not extend beyond it. The lincoi the Com promise therefore did not reach the Oregon Territory, not one pari of which was ever a part of the Territory of Louisiana, acquirea oy tne unneu oiaies num x.-inw. theii could Oregon have been put down by Mr. Reid as included in, because norm oi u e Missouri line ? Is all this to be attributed to io-norance of the geography and history of these Territories ? Not so. It is a flimsy excuse, invented to suit the occasion, and to hide or plaster over the enormity of a vote which should sink a regiment of politi cians ! , . i. But I do not ask that my assertion should stand for proof in this matter. I wUl con demn Mr. Reid from the lips of his own friends. On the 12th January 1847, this BQmA Oreo-on Bill for which Mr. Retd voted in the House of Representatives with the Slavery prohibition in it as follows, viz : " There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in die said Territory otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted. ' On that day (see Con. Globe 147, page 169) Stephen Mams introduced the follow ing amendment, viz : " to j Iced, That noihiner in relation to slavery in this act shall be construed as an inl ntion to int if r with th" provisions or spirit of th Mis souri Comommis . but th sanif is wr by r cogni- z d as xt ndifig t all t rrit ry which may litre- after b acqmr d by tiie Lmttd Stat s. Mr. Thurman, said " he thought ttie whole of the amendment out of order, inas much as there was no portion of this Territo ry of Oregon to which the Compromise had any application wh ittver. Mr. Ham in (then and now a distinguish ed political friend of Mr. Reid at present a Senator of the United States from Maine ) moved to amend Mr. Adam's proviso by ad adding the following viz: " Pmvidtd, Nothing herein contained on the subject" of slavery shall be construed as intending to intern re in any wise with the provisions or spirit of the Missouri Compromise.' Mr II. said " he would vote for the a mendment, without however any reference to the Missouri Compromise whatever. He held that that Compromise hid nothing to do wilh ihe Territory of Oregon. He voted un der the belief that it had no more appli tion to orf.con than' it had with the East Indes " Mr. Adams then withdrew his amendment and consequently Mr. Hamlin's proviso to it, fell Mr. Burt (of South Carolina, a political friend of Mr. Reid, then introduced the fol lowing amendment viz : Insert between the words " and" and "shall," in the 7th line of the 12th Section, the words : "Inasmuch as the whole of the said territory lies A"orth of 36 W'Js'orth lati tude known as the line of the Missouri Com promise." i It can be easily seen how this a mendmetit would have made the section read by reference to Ihe prohibitory clause before cited. Mr. Burt on the 14th January (See. Con. Globe 1S47 page 178) gave his reasons at length in favor of this amendment and on the next day it was rejected by a vote of 82 yeas navs. I he debate on the passage ot the Bill its third reading was then opened, from which debate, I will extract a few opinions touching the ground assumed by Mr. Reid. Mr. Thurman said, "A noi her r' aon why I Toied ncaiust the nmtnd tnccl ot the iieuticii en from South Carolina wan 'that if I fie Missouri compromise did not reach beyond the Rocky 31niiiitains. this h n jiroposirion t om'nii timl iumprcviue : in oilier rcords, to make another com- TtHo knows that th C'.mprmnist was confined to the Louisiana TtrrUory." w l appears, hoWew, that there is now a learned slatesman, fit, -to be Governor, who was- present and heard al uhis, who has found it convenient to appear more igno rant, than that "merest tyro." I think I am justified in declarinsr, that the sec -nd ground, assumed by Mr. R id, as an ex cuse for bis vote is unfounded in fact, and reason. The history of the passase of that Bill sliould overwhelm not only his second excuse, out ins hopes and prospects forever as a public man ! But before indulging in those reflections which are naturally suggested by reading the debatp, above quoted from, let us proceed to MN Reid s other excuse. .... 3. That it was not the VY ilmot Proviso wuicn was in the Oregon Bill. 1 Then what Proviso was it ? It must be remem bered that the Convention which nominated Mr. R id in 1848 passed the following Resolution (as may be seen by reference to the Standard of that day.) 10. Besotted, That tlm Coneress of the United Slntps has no control, directly or indirectly, medi a' ly or inline liatcly, over the instiintion of Slavery" . n I that we are opposed to the Wilmot, or Win throp, or Webster Proviso in whatever shape it may bf preentrd. j This Resolution deals a death blow at all the Provisos whether from IVinthnp, Wflmot or Webster! The truth is, they did no! know, iliat Mr. Reid had given such a vote as the one we arrconsiderin?, or they would not have suns; quite so loud about Provisoes. A friend, however, ha siiorcrestpd. that DerliaDs thy did know all about it, and that is the reason why ihey shot off such a bis gun against the whole froviso lamiiy old as well as young upon the same principle that the culprit wlio wishes to escape observation and detection is always the first and loudest in the cry ol "llvef. tliirf !! catch him!" Be this as it may, the Whigs did not learn that he had ever given such a vote, until the last election was either over or it was too late to make it public, and hold it up before the People in that light which it de serves ! i T But I again ask what Proviso was it 7 Now I assert that it was the veiitabl Wilmot in so ma ny words, and that the only difference jin them, was ihe territory to which they were to be ap plied. In principle they were the same, just as the st 'aling a shoat is as much a violation of the article of the decalogue "thou shall not steal'' as the felonious taking and carrying away a valuable horse, or a purse laden with guineas. Why,are intelligent meu to be humbugged, by a mere quibble 1 By a species of weak and contemptible sophistry, which a mere child in reason, can scat ter to the winds ? Look at it! The Standard com ing to Mr. Reid's aid, declares that it was not that same young monster, the real ilmot, which he had denounced so lustily, that decorated the Ore gon Bill so much to the liking of his friend, but the vcncrabl; scroti h aded old monster, which gained favor long time ago, called the "Ordih akceof'87!" I am glad of this admission. It brings us to a point to which I always like to come in an argument. INow, it holds to reason, in ethics, politics and mathematics, "that things equal io the same thing are equal to each other. If it can be proved then that the real "Wilinot Proviso"' is always the same in principle with the that scorn and contempt WhirS .u the hands of a highmin.W 1V x) But there is vettohf. . much more humiliatiivr fak7 ? "ch w ter. I ask-I beg .heWf wbjfe the discussion on the 0?4n n,' found in the Congressioi r", It 1847Tpagesl30and 180 J 1, of that the Suulh offere.1 ih si .VVlll 'her. nch oforT0:1 .1: , guageofWr. Calha,L " w in 7 It was voted down by a Z r , And what Southern UtW'S tone in which HnmV,n 'i ., "lte diM.,r cs announced to hi V ' !Pr Nunlte mare Compromke, &f CJ boil wiih wUigiiaiionanJrecp,.,!mi i taunungiy told in that diicuaion ,i . H ui uiigir&a over ttiesubipct of si. : poJ c asser eu r iPih. i' " fweim ivr it ... . " ieinr ih.. north was arrogant and iBSU,in ' if0?1 il in l erd?: insult M HOW. after Such rnm'i,,., for eur rignts such wh6lei. - inr3iH' ton...-. "'SUit In .. ' "" .. ". Ji p 1 . ' ."Ve lro' the S- ,T u-C .uiru iur mat Dill. w,,l, , mous emblem of our hi.. J i i-.. ii - .. "-'-""Jiion anj ,. hens.ble, and should be jihe 'subj4tTr every honorable man, thai ihe J 7k upon n, mat inaik of rH-k.. ""J u"fSw justly deserves ! Whei I nfC' sentati ve is made to yield jncll bv -B battered down to give laws to "a a"? wuu, muse we senu i)o Cori-e P' defend our rights, and lltonor " i-.,t auu cowardly yield every thm- ,u m hand of our 0 not oiny unretjuKd Sll:t) u,it and un(.n VP. -"'"UMCM k- " iliite tcu, im iiuiiurs nr.,,. prepared lor, and amply da.t ittie ui tuwarus anu slaves! lilts VOU o) David S ,(kid foT rh r " ndlt the principle of th, Wt,llot pfU already teen used by the AtoaioM. kt as a taunt and argumtnl azaw, ,e , His election alter that mt l,ai issue made upon it, ml! hi rardei rious triumph, and their orZs Ji T ' tion arid rtjvichi mhIii. A triuinpli w ,ic, may flalleril,.r,, ,ty of Democr y, butw.il provc. to the proud .irti of the South ' L t lh. p opt- say , which th, nr.-'.., , ARE BEFORE THEM ! 181 A CAKOUNLft TACTS' "Ordinance of '87'' and that the "clause inhibit ing slavery"' in the Oregon bill for which Mr. R. voted is also the same in principle, with the "Or dinance of 87" then of course the "clause in hibititig slavfry ' in ihe Oregon Dill'will be the same in principle with the r al " V ilmot Proviso. ' For ins'.ance let V stand for the W ilmot O for the Ordinance of 87 and C for Mr. K s. clause for iuhibiiinz slavery. How then will it Work ? promise For ilie?e rraons. Mr. Speaker, if fr no other I .1 '..I i snomu nave votea nfj.-iinsi tne nniennrnrnt ol me 'j'iiVicinPii from . outfi Carolina. lam no eivmy ol the Misw-curi coin'iomi as fr as thu compru- : FOR THE REGISTER. Mr. Editor : I desire tocallfthe attention of our Western people to the insincerity of the Democratic Party, on the subject of Free Suffrage, a question in which we are deeply interested. 1 charge it on the leaders of that Party, at least in the middle and Eas tern counties, notwithstanding Alt their loud professions to the contrary, they have a set tled purpose of finally defeating this great measure ; and that the sole object in aoitA- tingHt, has been party triumph lh the Convention of 1835 j called to a mend our Constitution, containing so many odious restrictions, are to be found the names bin, of bu frr'SK S; I --ifr who are since dead or re city of old to whicHlfee great poet referred, tfTfe-Ji? Branch.i Charles Fish Such bono 8 Hon to her hero paid. lL4 ' "el-m,- , And peaceful slept the mighty Hector's shade." Dhalanx of th.-L lu- h"d..a whole . T' -uieis oi mat same Bill." Finajlly, the Party are Avhippcd in, in the IIoUjC ; the Bill paacs that body and goe to the Senate, where it is killed. Immediate ly aftefwards, Mr. Ray tier again introduced his biil for a Convention of the I'eople on this subject (the only certain and fair mode of ascertaining the sense of the people.) On its second reading, it was defeated by a vote 74 to 16 ( of the w hole being necessary to pass itj ) Among the latter were 12 demo crats and 4 Whigs. These Democratic gen tlemen should be remembered : they arc Messrs. Brown, Davis, Herring, R. H. Jones, Kelly, A. J. Leach, Mosely, McNeil, Nixon, S. Person, Saunders, and C. Taylor, 6 of whom could have passed the bill ! Several of this party did not vote at all among them Mr Keen. Such, Freemen of Western Carolina, is the history and fate of this question slighted in '35 laid on the table in '40 and '41 and killed in '48 and 9, and by Democratic votes; The reasons why the party in the Middle and East are opposed to this great mea sure and will always seek its defeat, are per fectly palpable and ari well understood by them I shall not recount them. But we ol the West now see that:there is no truth in the Democratic party on this subject, and we are done with them. The v. higs are yet to be tried But the West; will henceforth steer her own course in this jssue irrespective of party. And I say to the Dem cratc mem bersjof the last Legislature and to their con stituents who defeated IFree Suffrage, you cannot prevent its ultimate success. The West has been borne down by the unequal influence of the East. hat we gained in tire Convention of '35, we were willing to abide by: We had no idesire to wage a sec tioned warfare against iour brethren of the East. But, sirs, when lyour leaders put up as their Standard bearer a man, who comes from yov. to us and undertakes to preach a crusade against yourselves, and you endorse thatj man by your votes, we are bound to submit no longer. This thunder triumphed before. Remember 1835. And mark my prediction, it will triumph again. BUNCOMBE. July 1st 1850. I One of tub trve Doctrinites. July 4th, 1850. Barnum, on dii has boug"ht a church in Philadelphia, in which 2.000 persons can be seated, and he intends fitting it up for Jen py Linda' concerts. Dartv. not on, nf tk 1 , , . . iusfQ nis voice a gainst the unjust and sectional provisions al ltLUJr vumamcu ur men inserted in our Con stitution, nor moved a peg fowards : the re cognition of the great principle of Free suf frage by that Convention, j Yes, sir ; there are the names of Geo. Bower, of Ashe Cal- RANDOLPH. We qnderstnnd ttere are nine enndidmee for the Commons in Randolph. It is pro-poM-a wa i,g onTemrnon the 8th. in oTd- r Brother Brown, at tb Hieruld, has e. lrei-l'i-live aspirants a miignauimous example, bv "Witii- ui"6 uuiue lruui me Cunvntis. j Qretnsbororgh Patriot, pies thus gravely urged as an excuse ox past j " l5e t, u''- ' - " fr ernnds it has bten al- l i .1 -i r i . . - 1 rttldll frrrtitfrl m' h n rtril till ' fi Tfrnt inn intt-rrl n,irl 2 - - - " ) 1 am for crr.cvtiit! it to far as it remains vnerenUcd This has not len a question about adhtring to the Missouri cctnpromis'. Tin t compromise, es I saiil b'fore. reached cnly to the summit of the Rocl.y Moun. turns. 'All the territory acquired of France south cf ZG d'r; 'M hit is already formed into States, rcith the rre'lion of a itliic itest of the State of Arkansas bi tten inwhirh slavery in tolrraipil Tnat conipro iiiije, ihen intuil of b-injr.vinUttH!, has bem T--!ijio"a!y obseivr.l by the North, mid will be rolig lonely i.bfi-rve.." And pray, did Mr. Reid hear all this? Was he deaf or asleep ? Mr. H ami. in obtained ihe floor next and spoke at grent length in favor of the Bill, and 1 call the particular attention of the friends of Mr. Reid to his remarks. He said 'Lt'ui.Muii was acquii cl by the treaty of 1803 : subsequently to the ucquii-iiioii of th it territory there ai adopted by both branches of Congress what wns callel ihe Missouri compromise. One word in rela tion to that compromise. The gentleman from South C:iriilin i yesterdny presented his .xineudrnent, thus Dpeuing the wi le field of elavcy to discussion. I. w.-is an iunendiu-nt recognising clearly and distinctly (hut the line of parallel estublished in the Missouri oompromise extemled through to the Pac fic Ocean ..r ih'it all the territory lying north irftb.a line vg! nihr-icf-d within its provisions. Why. sir the gtn t lemon negatives thi proposition by his own arvme-tt The declaration icith which he commenced his speech mas clearly and distinctly that that territory of Oregon mas acqtfired by the treaty of 1 8-1 6. What application, and what bearing then, could the compromise of IB2u have vpon territory which tvas secured by the treaty of iS46? Sir, it had no more connexion with it, as I hate aircaay saw, man u nua wuh tilt islands 0 the farther Indies. If it was embraced in the purchase ot Louisiana, the geutleman's amendment was a work of supererogation. If it was njt embraced within that purchase, it wss extending that line to territory that had no connexion wiih it Mr BUKT here interposed, and Mr. H yielding the floor) begged leave to any that the gentleman from Maine, as well as the gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Thin niari he thought did uot do entire jus tice to the researclj nnd discrimination of those on the opposite side of this question , when they intima ted to the House that ihey were under a luixnppre beusion us to the Missouri compinuii.se WJIY SIR. TIIE MEREST TRYO KNOWS THAT 'IHE MISSOURI COMPROMISE WAS CON FINED TO THE LOUISIANA TERRITORY 1 tuiuk, sir; if 1 made nijtelf intelligib.e on auy point whatever, 1 could not have been misunder stood in saying distinctly that Oregon was a new territory h territory to; which there was no compro- ui isc (ijiiitjou'v Mr. Hamlin resumed : 'If he had designed to make a new Missouri com promise line though to the Pacific, on the parallel of 3(i 30 lat. it would have been a little more open If such hud been the language which set forth the tncncimeui wmch be proposed I did myself there fore apprehend that he designed to jovcr ibu terri tory as ii purt of tht territory belonglogto the Union, fey th acquisition ol LokiaK?Visirl,eteils U8 tT' ud, distineily ihat Vts.nuH(iMleBt a -for the purpose of ?xtidg that Jia suTUftttna IT OVe T:IT WUt ITJ.W MT ExisT BEFORE. Te GENTTEMANS AM ENiMENT WAS K EJECTED BV A VOTE OF THIRTY ONE MAJOH1TY, CLKARLY SETTLING THE i. ESTIOft N..W ANf FOREVER THAT Wfi ARE TO have no new Missouri comphom, .... The Boston Post mentions in proof of the progress of phonography, that a lazv boy out west spells Andrew Jacison, &ru Jaxn. conduc', to be the guide of his future actions? II so, then dod forbid, that lie should ever be elected Governor of the honest old Stale of North Carolina ! Js it not the odious doc trine of Seward, over and over aain ? Can you make any thing (ess odt of it t Is it not creating a necessity, a rule of action, a guitre, for Legislative conduct, above, beyond, higher than the Constitution, and more bind ing than your oath to support it ! Is not this the very ground which Seward, and his abolition associates assume as an excuse, a justification, for assailing our rights? Tiie wit of man cannot dev se a process of reason ing or invent a web of sophistry, by which it can be made out anything else, in sub stance and elfect. There is not a member of Mr Reid's party in the State, who, if he sin cerely bel.eves that Congress has no right to prohibit Slavery in any of our Territories, or who believes that thus to prohibit it, wrongs and degrades the South, would not open y and unhesitatingly declare (political bias being thrown aside,) that he should have suffered Oregon to go without a government, for a century, before giving such a vote ! Is there one who would not so think, who would not thus speak? Why' then will they suffer themselves to be gagd, manacled hand and foot, by the iron despotism of Party ? Is not this a matter, upon which hangs the very existence of the South ? Is this a principle we can tamper with, or yield up to the dic tates of expediency ? Will they can they, shut their eyes to this vote of Mb. Reid, andthe excuse given for it? But he attempts to avoid the consequences of it upon the ground, 2. It was carrying out the Missouri Com promise, " the restriction in the Bid apply ing to the territory of Oregon alone, all of wriich lies north of the Missouri Compromise line " Now I assert that the Territory of Oregon had no connection whatever, with the Mis souri Compromise, that said Compromise did not extend to that territory, either by its terms or inspirit, and I further assert, that Oiegon did not lie JV rth of the line of that Compromise. And now for the proofs, and I ask a can did attention to them. In the first place what was the Missouri Compromise ? In the 8th section of the act passed 6th March 1820. to admit that State, it, vas provide!! as fol lows: - -i "And be it further enacted,. That in all thai territory ceded By France io the United Slates oni dor tho narne of Louisiana, -"Uich lies mirlh of thirty-six degrees 4 thirty minutes n.,rth Jaiii tude, not included wiinin the limits or the States coinplated by ihi act, slavery and involuntary servitude, wherwisthan m the punishment of crimes whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, arH itl hereby, forever prohibf tfd : Provided always, Tetany person escaping into the same,' from whorrilabor or service is law fully claimed iu any State,br Territory of the U. States, such fugitive may lawfully reclaimed, July July July Juiv July Jotv Julv W equals O. J herefore, (things equal to (' ennals O the same thing, jeiug equal to C equals U. ach othpr YV. (the Wilmot,) equals C. (the Clause.) Now tria these things are so that this is truth, and that Mr. lieid did vote for the principle of ihe Oregon Bill, 1 appeal again to the record, and to the testimony of his own political friemls. As I beforesiated whilst the Bill was under considera lion in the House, Mr. Bprt, of C, made a tpeech on it. 1 besrall to procure that speech and read it. Ii most effectually uses up Mr. liiid. Referring to Oregon, Mr. B. said li Was ihtn propot,-d io apply io that territory by tne If t;iIalioii ol Cong -Si t!if prohibitions, condii ions, and rt stricii'Ji s ot the ordinance of 17S7. The opinions f its inhabitant!, were alike unknown and unheeded Tl.ese opinions were not at all consoled in ibis proposed legislation Slavery did uot exist in th t territory. He rlil not kuuw tbut a slave e' er made ur ever would nvtke a I'ooi-priut on its soil, lt ihe itrlicle.of the ordinance of were nd: pled, ii w;ik dfigned to be an eternal interd.ct upon shi vi ry in thai territory. Had Congress i be power, he sk d, to impose Ujoii the people ol Ofeg u ihtt r?- (tiilinn? Iff rriiiispil I n msl 11 ill h lul unn-ir lh;it inquiry. First rclmt was the article of the ordinance ! "j"' fit I7V7 ntiri v n s nvn.intd t ft n..r.tn If, ii.',. --rrrt t 0 'V ry of Oregon li w..s to be found itinout! Cfriain j a tides winch, in th;it ord:u:nce, were deiioiniuiitea ; ' ar.iic es of compiict between tin-original Sinter ami j the-people nnd Statrs in tiie territory northwest ol j tiie nv.-r Onio.'' The sixth articl provides: J ' There slurfl be neither slavery nor miuhnttary ser- , titudt in the saiil territory, otlu.rn-ise thiu in the pun- xshment of crimes nrhereof the party shall hart betn du ly corn ictcd.1' This then, (according to Mr. B.) was the Or dinanceof '87. This Ordinance or. inhibition of slavery was the very clause in the; Oregon Biil for which Mr. Ileid vote.! Nowlpt us inquire what was the li'ilmot Pr viso 'f I again call Mr. Burt to the stand. In that same speech lie said During the last session of Congre-s. when a pro position was iuaie iu that Hall td furnish the Government of the Un ted States with ihe rneuns of concluding a treaty of peace wiih Mexico when au appropriation was .gked fur the simple purpose of concluding a trc -iy of pence with .Mexico a Dtmo aaiic representative from Pennsylvania rose in his plaeand moved the mteidict o f the ordinance c1787 nyen any territory thut might be acquired from the enemy in Mexico. W ho was that "Democratic itepresebtative from Pennsylvania?" David Wilmot !; W hat did he move (according to Mr. Bort,) a? a Pro viso to the Three Million Bill ? "The interdict of the Ordinance ol' 17871' ; But let these several provisoes , or inhibiting clauses be put side by side. Here they are look at them ! Let Democrats look at tliem : Grand Consolidjiitd Loiitrick nf Chartered by Ac; of A, ,.,. , sion of Stale aoihuritios ap,0;iliej bv tetJ. of the State of M-iryianl HE JIB QUARTERS! Office N. W. corner i Ua:nmie 4 CJiert Museum Budding, L'ui.'uwr' W The mosi hnhiaiif.ir.ay oi PiiiMMtfj short space ol one niotiili iiaveLcea JUvr.iiutMj Ihe Mirjlarjl Ageucy c m-inj; :ne m-uihufju. We notice only tLf i.riLc.p.i Prii-sclWrfli V1N&CO. t aj'iial Fnze 'J0 000, o. 30 ii 66. corrrspouctiii m f ei,n iv.. m i. 'os. 24 57 6-J, prize C.O.M1; l.A'mi. Nus. 15 G7 73. piii- 35.01'y, X.Cri,3-iii package of quarters of tickt. V.... On 1-1 4 1 t ". ;inn . w i - pnckxge ol wh"le UCUtt?. Nos. 4 4S7S prize. 11,000; Alibani-nipi Hge of half tickei.". Aos. 2G '-'7 42. prlae 9.t!00; Tennn. Nos 23 55 63. uni.- n 'Sn- Vl .rv-.mi IN os. '27 bt 71, pMjt 0 O.i J; Oi.io. ros. 13 37 5S. pi iie 1SV'J0; Teuueffe'' Nos. 1 9 4D, prizs Uo.Ou'i u a piick.ig? of ters of tickeir, sold Iu Ali.biina. Two quarter slmpts ol the giand Capital prjii 80.000 were sold in packages o! qwir of tian Class L, June 15. 15(50. UAUIXIAD rOTTERlD FOR JULY ISM, 2y Orders per mail receive f-rotsyuitetJl Date. tJopitaU IVo. pf Ballot. Tk'tt.PVu July 1, -24 00-: 7S ius. 13 dra'u ySr V July 2. SO.OtiO 75 js'o.-. 12 din'n 5. K 111, 3, 3.) 000 7 4. 22.500 75 5.3of 10 ut'U 72 8. 26 00a 7 fl SI i00 75 10. 33.000 75 '. 1 1. IM.i'l'O 7S fS jN..-. 15 ilr.i'n Kos. 12 ilra'n .Nos. 13 Jr..'u Aug lt.dra'll, Mi 'i dra'n, 13 .irj'r., 1 3 ilra"n, I! 5, 5. 0, 9, .2 15, til. 0 75 Sos. 11 dra u, 4, 13. 5 -,000 73 A". is. 12 drj'n, 15. 15, 25, ()!MI 75 iS..s J5 .ira"n, S, 16, 20,001' 75 Jos. 12 d'a'i., 5, 17, oO.tiOO 78 Nos. 13 d'an HI, Id. lO.Otlii 78 Nos 13 d. n, 19. 24,0; 0 'ib N,.s 13 d.a'n, 5, 20, 40 0110 75j os. 18 ilia'n 15 22. 12 000 75 No?. 11 drrn, OrdVce of '87 " There shall be neither slave ry nor involun tary servitude in thesaid territory otherwise ihan quisitionof any :u i :. i- in tne punish ment of crimes,! whereof the par ty shall have United States been duly, con icied." Wilmot Pro. " Provided, Thai, as an ex press and fun datnental con dition to theac territory from the Kepublicol Clause in O. Bill. "There shall be neitherslavery nor involuntary servi tude in the said Territory other wise than in the punishment o f crimes, whereof PROMISES OF A SIMILAR CH.,RACTF the I acific; Mr. Burt declared "that the m rest Mexico by ihelthe pany shall United States.have been dulv by virtue of any convicted." treaty which! may be negoti ated between them, and to the use by the Executive oil the moneys herein appro priated, neither lavery nor in voluntary ser vitude shall ev er exist in anv part of said ter-l ntory, except: f o r crime. whereof the! party shall first oe duly con vie wi tvu Where k the difference in .nriv1, TrTe not all our TWi. acquired by the common treasure, if not the commou blood, of all the Slates? I The Wilmot Proviso was nothing more nor less than the interdicting clause of the Ordinance of '87 which interdicting clause! was in ihe Ore gon Bill for which Mr. Reid voted. How then can he have tne boldness-tlie .effrontery to de clare, that iu casting that vote he did not sustain the VVilmot Proviso'cven in principle t Tell it not in Gath! Such, a pretext-f such glaring equivocation such wretched attempts to deceive, aye, and that too, upon a subject which is life or death to us all, will be exposed, and be met with 21. 5, 10, 5, a 2:1, n , 10. Julv July Inly July July July 23. 19,W)0 72; Nos. 11 tlr.i'n, July 24 3.1 0H0 75 N's 14 .Jr,.'u. July 25, 24.00 S;Nos. 16 .In'ri July 20, 8.577 75 iMos- i.itimo, July 27. GlMHiO 7$ V. lO-irrn, July 29. 9.000 7" Ne.3- 16 dr.i'n. July 30. 2 '.ti0O 7h Nw 12 Jra'n, Julv 31. 37.5110 li Nos 10 dra'n, - ii.ui. ...... 3 - - 11.... . ; Kona iv pieseni. , j KF-Letiers carefully dirtcteirwi return mail rrp Col via A: Co. send uiamrf toal! who order tickrt8. rv-- II.. ..I. ., ll (TOOli Ul.Sf IDlMC' or Prize tickets received iu pduueiil, I " tlCU- ; . . r....fc Aafii i . I rizes casnen ai .ll those liolilii.g prizes. .. ru li uiucia ai ifci,v , . in . n ters. prompt aitcnlion ?iiwa& lr "r,v fQ. 11 . .'-Aaf 1 Mi'-'- officii':' Please address, E, L. CJLOTIIIUti jtsTA1 UNDER TELEGRAPH FaycIlcTillc Street, NOW oreniiic hii-KeiiuJ corrpil orRe:ely M,Je Clothinj. Bliick. Blue. Brown f rocs tft Brown, Blue and DnibOve, L- Cloaks, fnts, vcsis. U,V , ulliirtWJ nenders. H..ll-Ho,e. Pocket H 1 1 , - .1 u i liri'i urn f.ici pverv Store. CHEAT FOR CASH. E.L. October 16, 1S43. 3IK. A; JUS Bl,B,tl TiiSBOUOUUrJ.- U' THE F.U.ion willcommeuce the l7.Bof Jul? - .jrCjtf J ri? n f.X -Payable t-;"r f B.rd and J'Uitioi., per se-wn, Music, Use of TiiaO. Frenca, Lai 111. Drawing, i kno"1""1 v...,y...r nan co hirs raa,le hl t ui 1 1'1 Y Juuo i6ia, i -TnTtfnD Court, opi .uft - . . H1. A . 11.J1 .l.ior. Ill ihe court - c,ari 1J Uliuo 1 ' r ores ui couu piuy ' -. kra.,.l I mill V, ,hrft8"J ... .'! ki;: Thomas Dickspu. so a - . T,lCi.u j tale of R. B. Wodar0ur-- ,fl ,s il.e examined Mid prcnonnerd goj-i , I a short disiance from wr tmib' V covered wi.l.ihe 1 'I drill'- UI rAm desirable property. and approved untyn plg July 1st,
The Weekly Raleigh Register (Raleigh, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
July 10, 1850, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75