Newspapers / The Daily Record (Dunn, … / June 9, 1952, edition 1 / Page 4
Part of The Daily Record (Dunn, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
PAGE FOUR <lh? jHailg Jtemrd DUNN, N. C. Published By RECORD PUBLISHING COMPANY At Sll East Canary Street NATIONAL ADVERTISING REPRESENTATIVE THOMAS F. CLARK CO., INC. M 5-217 E. 42nd St, New York 17, N. Y. Breach Office* Id Every Major City SUBSCRIPTION RATES BY CARRIER: 20 cents per week; SB-54 per year In advance; tt for six months; $3 for three months IN TOWNS NOT SERVED BY CARRIER AND ON RURAL ROUTES INSIDE NORTH CAROLINA: $6.44 per year; $3.54 for six months; $2 for three months OUT- OF-BTATE: $8.54 per year in advance; $5 for six months. >3 for three months Entered as second-class matter in the Post Office in Dunn, N. C., under the laws of Congress, Act of March 3, 1879 Every afternoon, Monday through Friday Governor Scott Rebuked By One Os His Faithful Ever since Governor Kerr Scott went into office, The Greensboro Daily News has been one of his most loyal and most enthusiastic and ardent supporters. During practically all of his ups and downs, this Greensboro newspaper has stuck by him. Seldom has The Greensboro Daily News ever been able to find anything wrong with Kerr Scott or I is policies. At times, we’ve even thought that The News, like Jonathan Daniels’ News and Observer was an official Scott mouthpiece. They have always said, in effect, ‘Praise Alla, Praise Kerr” as loudly and as long as possible. But yesterday, one of the strongest editorials condem ning Scott's practices that we’ve ever seen appeared in the Greensboro papfer. We read it a couple times to make sure we were seeing straight. So significant is this editorial by one of Scott’s strongest supporters that we believe it worthy of reprint ing. And to all Editor Henry Kendall has said, we, to, sgy “Amen.” Here’s the editorial, entitled, “What Purpose Is Ser ved?” Over and above the matter of timing, vindictiveness and venting of childish spleen inherent in Governor Scott’s axing of “disloyal” appointees in Raleigh is one burning question which must be answered: How does this political head-chopping further the aims of good govern ment in North Carolina? The answer is that it does not, by any sound reason ing or intelligent measuring stick—even- for the Gover nor’s own program in which he still professes deep and abiding interest. As in any purge or blood-letting, an atmosphere of disquiet and confusion exists in Raleigh this weekend— one not conducive to carrying out aims or goals of any body’s program. Pfbjected across the Tar Heel horizon by the Governor’s actions are the blood-smeared words “PO LITICS” in capita? Tetters. Transmitted to the people in forceful measure is the fact that political conformity and “playing on the team” has been paramounted to every other merit involved in state service. Politics runs ram pant through the fabric of the Scott administration in Raleigh to the detriment, of sound government and the program of progress which the Governor himself launch ed in North Carolina. Stott has taken the lead in such activities and al though he has no* been alone, his latests moves indicate that he will go to any ends to force his will on his ap pointees—even to the edge of violating the states’ cor rupt practices act. There might be some rhyme or reason in such head chopping if by doing so the welfare of the Governor’s pro gram and-or the state itself were being served; but with only seven months of his term remaining, it is impossible to see what his purge does except disrupt, slow down and poison a dying administration. At this juncture the Daily News is more interested in the cause of good government than in analyzing simple or complex motives behind the Governor’s flaunting of his waning power. He has ripped apart the fabric of government in sev eral departments already and may be prepared to move farther. The director of the probation commission, who, as far as the Daily News knows, has been doing a good job, has been snatched out of his job to occupy briefly the spot formerly held by Dr. T. C. Johnson. Johnson’s firing may be good riddance, but was it necessary to dis organize the probation commission set-up in the process? The director of motor vehicles has been pushed out of his responsible position with no indication, as yet, who will take over. By asking his assistant budget director to re sign, the Governor has thrown that office into turmoil, and there is no telling how detrimental that may be to the carrying out of its duly authorized business. Much of that work involves the very state building program in which the Governor himself professes so much interest. The disquietude and unrest that such widespread head-copping at this late hour produce must result in less rather than more efficiency in carrying out government duties. Thus the expressed purposes for which the purges were launched are being defeated in the very process. The Daily News has approved many sizable achieve ments of the Scott administration and still believes firmly in them. But much of their luster is being buried under the smallness of mind and vindictiveness of spirit ex pressed in the latest purge parade. Harnett Man Slain By His Son-In-Law Harnett County authorities, Sun day afternoon arrested Junior Aikens, youug Negro, and placed him in jail without bond for the slaying of his lather-in law, Muri Murphy, 58, of near Lillington. Murphy died at 1:20 Sunday morning in the Dunn Hospital as the result of. stjptgun wounds al legedly reiceive<J : at the hands of Aijcens Saturday night. The Shooting occurred at Mur- . phy’s home sometime between 7 and 8 o'clock Saturday night. As sistant Coroner Edgar Black said he was shot in the stomach with a .12 gauge shotgun. When Deputy Sheriff Ken Mat thews arrived on the scene, Aiken's wife told him that her husband had gone to the Sheriff’s office to sur render. He failed to arrive at the sheriff’s office, however, and was apprehended by the offieers Sun day afternoon about 3 o’clock. Deputy Matthews said he read ily addiitted the shooting, but gave no reasons. A jury was impaneled Sunday morning and viewed the body at the hospital. Members of the jury are: James E. Ward, Wesley Coats, Kle Hudson, Henry West, Ktou Warren and Howard L. (Skhmyl These Days £ckcLkij TAFT AND DULLES It was not expected that Sena tor Robert A. Taft and John Fost er Dulles would agree on the for eign policy of the United States. Senator Taft had been identified Jvith those who have generally Seen antagonistic to the Roosevelt- Truman-Acheson policies; John Fester Dulles is the author of the Bipartisan Foreign Policy and has actually been an official of the State Department, having carried Uie ball for the Japanese Treaty to its goal. Senator Taft, in his speech on foreign policy, quoted John Foster Dulles as follows: "Mr. Dulles points out in his article in ‘Life’ magazine that the whole European project, Justifiable as it is, would only make defensi ble 'SOO of the 20.000 miles which is the length of the free world’s frontier with the Soviet world.' He says ‘that those who think only of Western Europe and of making it impregnable—without regard to the Near, Middle and Far East and Africa—are just as blind as those who think only of the United States and of making it impreg nable.’ ” Identifying himself with this view, Senator Taft takes the posi tion that he and Dulles, adopting an American rather than an in ternationalist position, are broader in scope than Truman and Ache son, whom he calls “the new iso lationists.” The question that both Taft and Dulles really raise is whether the emphasis on Western Europe has not had the effect of isolating the United States diplomatically. Have we not abandoned strength for dependents? Have we not risk ed being ringed in by enemies and weak nations? Have we not turned alliep into neptrgls? . . Neither Taft nor Dulles advo ra<es an abandonment of Western Europe, but they both doubt whether our defenses can be limit ed to Western Europe. This does not involve Taft in a criticism of Eisenhower, who did not compose our foreign policy, but it does make a direct attack on the concept of national defense as conceived by General George Marshall and Dean Acheson. It really amounts to raising the question of how long can the United States afford to keep certain countries of Europe as dependents while ignoring coun tries that wish to be allied to us. Senator Taft stated it this way: “ ‘Would I withdraw from Eu rope?’ Certainly not. I believe we should continue to arm those na tions who, in good faith, are pre pared to use our arms to protect themselves against Communist ag gression. I would leave our six di visions there until the Europeans have reached a position where they can defend themselves. But ob viously if 220 million people in Eu rope, 50 per cent more than our whole population, cannot defend themselves with our arms, we can not do it.” John Foster Dulles stated the same idea in these words: "I have no quarrel with efforts to strengthen Western Europe. On the contrary, beginning in Sep tember 1941, I have consistently said that a strong, united Europe should be an essential peace ob jective. I do. however, say that any who believe that Europe can be made impregnable without re gard to Asia, are just as blind as those who believe that our Amer ican continent can be made im pregnable without regard to Eu rope. "Today the frontier of freedom is nearly 20.000 miles, running from the North Cape in Europe to the shores of the Bering Sea in Asia. Os this total frontier the Contin ental European sector is about 500 miles. It is not possible to gain safety. for Western Europe by try ing to hold these 500 miles while leaving another 10,000 miles de fenseless." No matter who is nominated by the Republican Convention, these two speeches will be accepted by a large and important element in the Republican Party as represent ing the party’s position in this field. John Foster Dulles, rather than any Republican Senator since the death of Senator Vandenberg, has been one of the principal guides of his party in foreign affairs. Even while Vandenberg was alive, Dulles played a leading role as his as sociate in policy-making. While Heibert Hoover has been trans lated Into a philosopher, Dulles has teen the craftsman actually car rying out Republican policy with in the government. How much dif ference there was between Ache son and Dulles, while the latter was in the State Department, we are only just coming to know. The acceptance of Dulles's concepts by Taft produces an unexpected ele ment of stregth within the party, particularly as Dulles's following has heretofore not been associat ed with Taft. At latest count, 17 countries oth er than the United States have television transmitters on the air. The list includes England, France, Germany, Russia, Italy, Denmark, the etherlands. Spun, Sweden, Switzerland, Czechoslovakia, Can ada, Mexico, tWfeR-Brssfl, Argen tina and Japan. THE DAILY RECOfcB, Bt)NN, N. C. MISTER BREOER “Always some excuse—the lawn mower’s broken, or somebody borrowed it or you’re too tired ...” 7 cji* wsiwtS' MjtMHHW-50- ROUND II Otiw muon WASHINGTON—The King Com mittee, which has done a remark able good job of probing tax frauds is about to wind up its career on June 30. Before doing so. however, it has explored—very gingerly—the tax returns and business operations cf one of its own members. That is almost unheard of in Congress. Members of the House ana Senate for the most part follow an unwritten rule that they do not pry into each other’s business. Nevertheless, the King Committee has done some quiet probing of its own members— none other than Congressman Eugene Keough Dem ocrat. who is elected from Plebeian Brooklyn but lives on swank Park Avenue. It happens that this columnist has keDt a weather eye on Congres sman Keough during the past two years and his record is interesting. Keough was elected to Congress in 1938, but for 11 years he took no appreciable interest in Spain. His career in Congress featured a plan to send the Congressional Re cord to federal judges and to grant free postage to the armed forces. Not one speech did he make on Spain. Then suddenly, after 11 silent yeafs In Congress, Keough sud denly became the champion of Dic tator Franco. He littered the Con- _ gressional Record with statements' end editorials favorable to Spain. He interrupted Congressional de bates to defend Spain. He offered an amendment to include Spain in Maishall Plan handouts. FRANCO LOBBYIST This began in 1449. It was in 1949 also that Congressman Keough was seen frequently in the company of Franco’s lobbylist, amiable. Unable Charles Patrick Clark, who now draws SIOO,OOO annually from the Spanish embassy though in 1949 he drew only $50,000. On Oct. 8, 1949, Congressman Keough paid a visit to Dictator Franco in Madrid in company with another Franco enthusiast, Sen. Owen Brewster of Maine. Loobyist Charles Patrick Clark was in Mad rid with them. Traveling on a Spanish train that lught, Congressman Keough was reported to have had $5,000 stolen, together with his pants, when he hung the pants too near a window in a sleeping car. Prior to 1949, also, Congressman Keough opposed the Natural Gas lobby and voted against the Rizley Bill which would have hiked gas rates. The Bill would have meant higher gas bills to the Brooklyn housewives who elected him, and he voted for the housewives. But in 1949, Keough and Charley Clark, lobbyist for a gas pipe line company, as well as for Spain, had become friendly and Keough rever sed himself. He not only followed CUTIES I •mu. UU. “You’ve pruned it % little close. .. but it’ll be bait Wd , hearty in forty or fifty yearg.’J> the gas lobby’s line during hear ings in committee, but actually in troduced two amendments which would have made the Kerr Bill Just as strong as the Rizley Bill which lie had previously voted against. After failing to strengthen the 1 ill, and probably to protect him self with Brooklyn housewives, Keough finally voted “No” on final passage. FEES FOR TAX CASE At about this time, Congressman Keough began to receive a series of checks from lobbyist Charley Clark. They were listed as pay ments by Clark for legal advice on a lax case which the Federal Gov ernment had against Silas E. Chambers of Miami. The first check was dated March 6, 1950, for $1,500; another on March 24, 1950, was for $1,000; April 5, $500; May 3, $500: and June 15, SI,OOO. The interesting thing was that Keough. as a- member of Congress, had no business accepting a law fee in connection with a tax case. Such law practice against the federal government by a member of Con gress is illegal. In September. 1950, some months after the checks had passed, I handed the information to the Justice Department, whereupon both Keough and Clark were quiz zed by the FBI. Immediately the Congressman wrote a letter to Clark, dated Oct. 31, 1950, which appeared to be aim ed at alibiing his transaction. It stated: “I have given further considera tion to the propriety of my con tinuing to act as advisory counsel. Therefore, if it meets with your ap proval, I should ask you to consider that our firm has withdawn and consider that the fee which you previously paid us will be in full.” When the Congressman and lob byist Clark were interviewed by this column regarding the p rpose o f these fees, they told different stories. According to Keough, Claix had merely dealt with his New York lawn firm, Halpin. Keough, and St. John, not with him. But When Clark was asked how Keough had earned these fees he explained that Keough had given very helpful ad vice. “Then it was Keough who advis ed you on this case?” Clark was asked. “Yes.” A short time later, the King Tax Fraud Committee of which Keough is a member, rightly reprimanded ex-Congressman Vincent Quinn of New York for taking fees in con nection with tax cases while he was a member of Congress. LOST HIS PANTS “How did Keough happen to lose -his pants in Spain?” I asked Clark. 1 “He hung ’em too near the win- Walter Winehell York WKCMft Bigtown Smalltalk: Mexican ar tist Diego Riveria, reported melting from his wife, is expected to marrtf Lily Terchino, a Greenwich Vil lage artist George Rapee is the name of the spender who enter tertains lavishly in the night spots. His tipping is skyscraperish, too . Marjorie Hassett, the model who has more dates than a calendar, prefers J. Pickman, the Paramount Pictures veep Harold Gatty, who flew l around the world with Wiley Post is in town. He owns an air line in the Fiji Islands The songs “Kiss Os Fire" and “So Exciting” sound so much alike because both come from a Spanish fhelody titled: “El Choclo”.. Roy Mack is agent ing the life story of Francis X. Bushman, one-time silent screen star.. The Criterion Theatre ads star Lili St. Cyr, the stripper ( in a 5-minute short “Love Moods”) over Jeff Chandler, star of the feature. Manhattan Murals: The movie theater usher in a 42nd Street grind house who uses a long pole with feathers on the end—to tickle and wake up snorers . Cha. Adler, Jr., the inventor, surrounded by a cu rious groups on Madison Avenue, He has a radio (turned on) in his hat . The fish dealer on 170th Street. (Bronx) who is named Casey Le- Mne. The chapeau in the win dow of an East 57th Street milli ner’s. Priced at only $450 . The sign on the Jaguar in the fussy Park Avenue and 59th auto show room which barks: “Sold! Do Not Touch!” Times Sq. Taffy: Phil Left is fche Journal-American's new co-edi tor of the woman’s page Johnny Perkins, in the cast of "Wish You Were Here,” earned his drama school tuition behind the Auto mat’s steam tables . Les Paul and Mary Ford, the only singing coni mcrshills these ears appreciate, open at the Paramount on the 18th at SIO,OOO per. He got $35 a week a few years ago . Pearl Bailey’s song “Breaking in the Next Guy" (at La Vie En Rose) is risgaiety. Sounds in the Night at Trader Tom’s: “This looks like the time any Republican can win on a laun dry ticket washing the Democrat'* dirty linen” . At Pierre: “Shes wearing Chlorophyl No. 5”. -At the Embers: “Same old story. He’s Back Bay and she’s Back Street" .. At the Little Studio: “She’s de scended from a long line her mo ther once listened to.” . At the Stork: “She’s still in her Oval teens.” The Late Watch: Marlon Bran do is linked with Movita and va rious Belles but Toni Parker of “Wish You Were Here” ’s theh big competition . .Katherine Lee, the dancing star, and Dolores Gray’s brother Richard, are uh huHneying . Jackie Kannon, Latin Quarter comic, has coast scouts bidding.. Many of the dolls at that spot transfer to Lou Walter’s new branch at Lake Tahoe soon. If you are pretty and can hoof ap ply any afternoon (after 4) to fill the vacancies . Spivy, who used to ruii that 57th Street roof spot for The Mixed-Up Set, now has a small boite in Paris . Johnnie Ray didn’t appreciate comic Jack E. Leonard’s kidding at Hutton’s but wound up shaking hands Show folks remind you that Ray’s weep ing song delivery is hardly new. It was the specialty of Jolson, Jessel and Belle Baker... And what about the best of them all at that sort of thing—Joan Merrill’s heartbreak torchanting of “How Did He Look? dow,” Clark explained. “Someone pulled them out at a railroad sta tion. But he only }iad $2,000 in his pocket—not $5,000 as reported in the press. They’d collected-. some money to pay for the importation of autos, and Keough was going down to the port to arrange for it. Congressman Keough in turn was asked when he happened to support Legislation which lobbyist Clark was interested in. “I don’t think I should com ment,” he replied. “Why have you made so many speeches favoring Spain?" Keough was asked. “I don't think I’ve had much to say about Spain,” he countered. Re minded that the Congressional Re cord was full of his speeches, he declined to comment Asked about the reversal of his position regarding natural gas af ter Clark got into the picture, the Congressman said he preferred ndt to go into the arguments of the gas legislation but he didn’t see anything inconsistent in his posi tion. Questioned about the fees he had received from Clark’s law firm in connection with the Silas Chamb ers tax matter, Keough at first re plied that a lawyer’s relations with hh client are strictly private. Later be claimed— counter to ?yhat Clark said—that Clark’s relations were wjth hi* law firm, not with him. That is part of the record of a member of the f£ing Committee now probing tax Hands. It wiH be interesting to see if the King prob ers proceed with their investigation of their own member. MbNbAV afternoon, june 9,1*52 The Worry Clinic Jjpß By DR. GEORG* W. CRAM* 'Ojj Do you know America’s Num ber One sth columnist? He trick ed Alice, even at the very mo ment she was being most friend ly to him. He causes men to lose Mheir jobs. He breaks up happy homes. He produces half of the automobile deaths. CASE 5-373: Alice T., aged 29, is an attractive housewife. “Dr. Crane, I did something very stupid last week,” she began ner vously. “One of my girl friends was moving out of town, and asked me to stop for some photographs she had promised me. “Well, my husband agreed to stay with our two little girls while I drove over to my friend’s home. “Liquor was served, as a matter of course, in this household, so I had a highball. And soon I was given a second. “Before I left, however, two couples dropped in to/tell my friend farewell, so we had some more highballs. “One of the mep then told me he didn’t like me,/ for I was too cold and snooty, i “That made me /angi% so I gave him a piece of my mind. We al most came to blows. The rest of them parted us and siyatested we drink again as a) peace-Token. liquor’s Dividends "Well, the liqqior flowed freely and I had my Now you may wonder why I iim telling you all of this, Dr. Cjrane. “But my (conscience has been giving me pto rest. For I can’t even remember all I said and did. “But I vaguely recall being quite coarse and vulgar! I told very in timate (filings about myself and my husband, upsetting my hostess terribly. “And for the ensuing week I have been haunted by the feeling that If did something AWFUL. And I really AWFUL! “I’jm sure I didn’t commit adul- for the other man was too angVy at be’to’be that affection ate., But I’m not certain just what I did do. America's Foremost * Personal Affairs Counselor ( POLICEMAN COURTED BY WEALTHY GIRL AFTER HE CALLS HER DOWN IN TRAFFIC DEAR MARY HAWORTH: I am a fellow 27 years old, and I have a job as policeman with hours that change weekly. My problem concerns a very nice girl, 18, still in high school, who tells me she loves me very much, and that it isn’t infatuation. The whole thing started six months ago when I reprimanded her (while on traffic) for her driv ing. She apologized and promised to do better, and it was then she started liking me, because I was so nice to her. She found out my name and address, came by one day when I was out front cleaning the sidewalk, and after some con versation she asked me to take her out. I did my best to discourage her, told her to come back when she was 21 and I might think about it, etc., and she went away. But later she kept on asking me, and finally I agreed, thinking an evening together would end it. But we had an enjoyable time and she began to like me 'more. , During the evening I learned that her parents are very well off, she lives in a big house with ser vants, has a costly car of her . own, and they belong to several high class clubs. I told her I wouldn’t see her any more because of the difference in our religion, schooling, finances, way of life, our ages and our thought. But she insists all this isn’t important; that she can live on my pay, etc. I said she had better tell her par ents, who would be very much against it—and I was right, be-' cause her dad lodged a complaint with my precinct captain, asking him to stop me from seeing Bar bara. When the captain spoke to me about it, he said what I did off the job was my business, provided it was on the up-and-up and didn’t interfere with my work. I decided to stop seeing Barbara, but she kept on calling, ringing me on the telephone when she knew I was asleep, and generally making me unhappy. I knew I could stop the calls by agreeing to see her, which I did, and so we are going out to gether again. We have a nice tiine and I like ’ the girl very, very much; but I don't feel I love her as she loves me. Can you please tell each of us what we should do ? J. W. BETTER KEEP HRS GUARD. UP DEAR J. W.: Barbara’s self confident pursuit of yon sounds in keeping with her behavior in traf fic—reckless and inconsiderate, a threat to the welfare of others, the fault f6r which you called her down. I gather. Obviously she is mad for you at this time, and gain ing ground. And if yeti fail to keep your guard up, she probably wfll break your Mart eventually and “What I’d like to ask is this: Do normal people sometimes show low streaks of character when under the influence of alcohol? “All I can remember is that did something revolting and dis-» gusting. “Next day I called my friend and apologized, but she will have noth ing more to do with me. “I am not an alcoholic and have resolved never to touch another drop of liquor. “In fact, I am an active member of my church. So I feel quite dis graced over my behavior, lest it hurt my two little girls and my wonderful husband.” (' ALCOHOLIC ANESTHESIA Alcohol is the worst sth column ist on earth. It is a traitor to its best friends for it doublecrosses them. It acts like anesthesia in that it reduces your mental alertness, (I. Q.) until you have a childish mind for the moment. Meanwhile, it slows down your speed on an average by 10%, so you fail to use your auto brakes.,, on time. Or you lose your hand bytv slowness in pulling it away from dangerous machinery in the fac tory. And you don’t even realize you are slowed down by that 10%! You think you are perfectly normal, so you don’t make allowances for your sluggishness. It isn’t the drunken driver who is so dangerous on the highways. No, it is the apparently sober fel low with just a beer or a highball , under his belt, for he is slowed; 1 down in his reaction time and judgment. So stay away from John Barley corn entirely. He’s America’s Num ber One sth columnist and the twin brother of Judas Iscariot. Both are traitors. (Always write to Dr. Crane in rare of this newspaper, enclosing a long 3< stamped, addressed en velope and a dime to cover typing and -printing costs when you send for one of his charts.) poison your ingenuous soul with cynicism. You were seeing straight, and talking good common sense, when you decided not to see her again, after getting a line on the' world of difference between her accus tomed way of life and yours. Bar bara’s insistence, on the other hand, that the broad field of difference is unimportant, shows that she is ( unprepared to face reality. Either she is hardheaded and deaf to rea son, in the matter of grabbing what she wants that she can get, regardless of consequences. Or she is shallow and thoughtless, a fea therbrain. In any ease, I wouldn’t bet on her to be loyal, faithful and stable in matters of sentiment, if you were eating out of.her hand. Barbara’s current enthusiasm for you resembles a helter-skelter child’s absorption in a new toy. ( All else is thrown aside for it tem porarily. And her father’s gruff appeal to your precinct captain suggests that he feels unable to control or guide her, or to draw her back from folly or indiscre tion. Thus I infer that she is a wilful spoiled female, on defiant terms with her family; and per haps your relaxed, disinterested, “no-nonsense” attitude is a chal lenge she cannot resist. Your am- r iable air of self-sufficiency may bait her will-to-conquer. THEY ARE WRONG FOR EACH OTHER In the traffic situation you stood for authority that she had to obey on the instant, to avert humilia tion and penalty; and in the depths of her mind, unconsciously, she may have resented her “help less” feelings in the exchange. Hence, an impulse to get revenge may mingle with her overt flirta tious reaction to your manly char- I*' acter. Unaware of what bothers her, she may be after your scalp to even the score, and assuage her undisciplined ego. Inttiition tells me that she is wrong for you; and as a wife, she would be cala mitous for a man in your circum stances, I think. In my opinion, you should obey your hunch and stay clear of Bar bara. You can block her chase if you really want to; if your mind is made up to do it; and if you r still have the margin of neutral feeling that will permit you to shrug her off. Tell her flatly to leave you alone, to stay on her side of the fence with' her. kind of peo ple. Also if necessary to squelch her, ask your precinct captain to report back to the father about the girl’s nuisance-behavior in tracking you down. M. M. Mary Haworth counsels through her column, not by mail or per sonal interview. Write her in care f of the Daily Record. (Copyright, 1052. by The - Washington Post, Distributed by King Features Syndicate)
The Daily Record (Dunn, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
June 9, 1952, edition 1
4
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75