5A
OPINIONS/The Charlotte Post
January 23,1997
Not all news coming from Africa is that bad
By John William Templeton
NATIONAL NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION
Not all the news from Africa is bad news. As of Dec. 31
Zimbabwe’s stock market recorded a 70 percent gain
from 5,000 to 8,500. Ghana’s equity exchange was up 40
percent by year’s end and Mozambique had a 26 percent
increase in foreign investment.
On Jan. 25, Angola’s long-awaited government of
national unity will be sworn in, with South Africa’s
President Nelson Mandela putting the prods to former
rebel leader Jonas Savimbi, in his role as head of the 12-
nation Southern African Development Community. The
crisis in the Great Lakes region is real, but it should not
obscure some of the most hopeful news frum the world’s
second largest continent in 40 years, nor the sources of
the real problems.
Kofi Annan’s first speech after his ascension to the post
of United Nations secretary-general may not have been
the most historic speech by a Ghanaian in New York
during December. The address of Sam Jonah, chief exec
utive of the $2 billion mining conglomerate Ashanti
Goldfields of Kumasi, Ghana, to the New York Society of
Securities Analysts’ first seminar on investment in
Africa may actually do more to increase the paltry sum of
$4 billion in foreign investment that goes into Africa.
Jonah, Zimbabwe’s A.M. Chambati, South Africa’s Cyril
Ramaphosa and other business leaders are increasingly
becoming the new face of Africa to the outside world.
The kind of oligarchy represented by Zaire’s Mobutu
Sese Seko and Nigeria’s mihtary regime with the atten
dant diversion of national wealth being put into private
hands is becoming increasingly untenable in large part
because of the peer pressure of goverrunents that are
making progress in meeting the needs of their people
while attracting international investment. More than
2,000 enterprises - finm airlines 2md steel nulls to glass
factories and hotels - are in the process of being sold into
private hands by government owners across the conti
nent, fueling the growth of a dozen new stock markets.
The citizens of the affected countries are eager to share
in the wealth creation. The initial public offering of
Kenya Air attracted 200,000 individui investors. South
Africa’s exchange has added several new Black-owned
companies built fixim acquisitions from the large mining
conglomerates brokered by the new Black-majority gov
ernment.
One of the impacts of the torrent of disaster news from
Africa is to blind Americans to the potential markets and
investment opportunities. The top five nations investing
$450 million into Mozambique last year were Portugal,
South Africa, Britain, Hong Kong and the Netherlands.
African Americans are particularly affected by the notion
of Africa as a place to be ashamed of, as witnessed by the
performance of some national “leaders.” Dr. Leon
Sullivan, whose Sulhvan Principles helped turn the busi
ness screws on South African apartheid, is once again
taking the initiative in turnjng those sentiments around
with the Fourth African Anierican/Afiican Summit June
20-26, in Johannesburg, South Africa and Harare,
Zimbabwe. Prior to this year, the summits were held
eveiy two years. Some 47 African heads of state attended
The Summit in Dakar, Senegal last May.
Planes are taking off from 19 American cities to feny
U.S. participants on a journey across the southern part
of the continent. Sullivan has always been my pick as the
epitome of a “black leadeff because of his insistence on
practical results, from the Opportunities
Industrialization Centers to the Sullivan Principle to the
smnmits. You don’t hear him speak often, but you see his
work around the globe. Lake him, aU Americans should
understand that we have a vested interest in the success
of the African continent. That interest must extend
beyond extracting the precious metals and energy for our
economies, to making a reciprocal investment in raising
living standards. Unlike the failed foreign aid strategies
of the past, we can even make a profit, in the process.
JOHN WILLIAM TEMPLETON is executive editor of
San Francisco-based Griot, the African American,
African and Caribbean business daily.
What DuBois would say about Ebonics
By Sidney E. Morse
NATIONAL NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHSERS ASSOCIATION
When the Oakland, Calif.,
School District sanctioned so-
called “Black English” as an offi
cial language, is stated justifica
tion for this controversial move
was to “negate the stigma”
placed on African American stu
dents who come from communi
ties that have developed their
own dialect.
Sometimes, in order to strate
gically understand where we
are going, it is beneficial to
understand where we have
been. Dr. W.E.B. DuBois,
arguably the most famous
African American inteUectual of
the 20th century, attended both
Fisk University and the
University of Berlin before
becoming the first person of
African descent to obtain a doc
torate from Harvard.
Throughout his life, both his
vision and scholarship empha
sized education as a key to
improving the standard of living
for African Americans nation
wide.
Dr. DuBois, seemingly always
wise beyond his years, antici
pated the ramifications of
change and positioned himself
on “the cutting edge” as the
period ruled by agriculture gave
way to the “Industrial
Revolution” in the late 1800s.
If he were ahye today, in his
wisdom, he would see similar
dynamics occurring as we wit
ness the age of information tak
ing control in preparation for
the arrival of the 21st century.
In the sinnmer of 1906, W.E.B.
DuBois would give a now
famous speech, “The Hampton
Idea,” assailing the reliance of
Hampton Institute and others
like it on the dehveiy of practi
cal education in an effort to pre
pare the then considered “less
capable” African American for
jobs; a perception I might add,
that has since been changed. He
would go on to use these same
themes across the country to
warn African Americans of the
dangers of this ideology and
how it would not only result in
the handicapping of intellectual
ambition, but also create a com-
fortability with “second-best”
status in society as a whole
In this debate. Dr. DuBois
would astutely observe that as
was true at the turn of the cen
tury, the power and ability of a
people to move up the socio-eco
nomic ladder in America is pro
foundly impacted by its ability
to read, write, interpret and cal-
Too much political power, not
enough economic independence
By C. Mason Weaver
NATIONAL NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION
What is the goal of the black
community? Economic power or
political power?
Political power is a group
experience; it is usually
acquired through a structured
organization, run by clearly
defined leaders for the purpose
of meeting mutually agreed
upon goals. People can join
together for political power
under many different organiza
tions and groups. You can be a
member of a political party or
an ideological constituency.
You can work toward gaining
political clout as a member of a
group like the Concerned
Women for America, the
National Organization for
Women, John Birch Society or
your local church. This is a
proven, successful way to
ensure pohtical power. But does
political power ensme economic
power?
Have you ever noticed that
Japanese “communities” do not
seem to worry about how many
Japanese Congressmen there
are? Ever wonder why you do
not have a Korean
Congressional Caucus? It seems
odd to me that “Arab
Americans” and “Jewish
Americans” with such strong
and traditional political priori
ties seem more interested in
economics in America than poli
tics. Why? Because economics,
not politics, is the path to
achieving real personal freedom.
However, economic power
empowers the individual, not
social leaders. Social leaders of
every group are only interested
in pohtical power because that
empowers them. If the individ
ual becomes powerful that indi
vidual does will not need a
leader. That is why we have so
much focus on political power.
not the power of self-determina
tion.
While we prepare ourselves
for the season of black cultural
awareness, let us prepare our
selves for independence from
our cultural chains. While we
honor Martin Luther King Jr. in
January and clothe ourselves in
African clothes during
February, let us remember the
reason some of us still feel
oppressed by drugs, crime, high
taxes, bad schools and welfare is
due more from lack of money
than lack of political power.
I do not care how you define the
“black culture.” If the culture
has no strong semi-independent
economic base, then it resem
bles a plantation, not a commu
nity. The civil rights movement
was very much about gaining
control over economic means,
and not so much about gaining
political power as an end in
itself Of course, voting rights
were a very important issue
during the civil rights move
ment, but the March on
Washington, boycotts, demon
strations and civil disobedience
often focused on jobs.
Jobs were the reason Martin
Luther King traveled to
Memphis the week of his assas
sination. Jobs were the inspira
tion for the 1964 Civil Rights
Act and the motivation behind
the passage of afiirmative action
laws.
Civil rights are of little help if
the individual cannot secure
income and take advantage of
the right to live and work where
he pleases. Economic freedoms
are not decided by political par
ties or a social culture, they are
decided by the individual who is
willing to sacrifice all he has for
aU he desires. That is freedom
and that is America.
C. MASON WEAVER, a mem
ber of the national Advisory
Council of the African-American
leadership group. Project 21, is
president of The Committee to
Restore America in Oceanside,
Calif.
Fresh prints of Bundy
By Dennis Schatzman
SPECIAL TO THE POST
Critics, like CNBC’s Geraldo Rivera, are claiming that “the other
shoe has dropped” on acquitted double murder suspect O.J. Simpson
after another series of 1993 photos have surfaced allegedly showing
the pro foot! all Hall of Earner wearing the infamous Bruno Magli
shoes.
Although the first photo, which appeared in the supermarket
tabloid The National Inquirer, has been pretty much deemed a fraud,
the second series of photos show an equal nmnber of inconsistencies.
A close look at the photos, allegedly taken at a Buffalo Bills football
game, show that Simpson is wearing a jacket with a pin in the lapel
and a handkerchief in the upper pocket. The first photo, however,
shows a different jacket and no pin or hankie. Go figure. The releas
ing of these latest photos, and Superior Court Judge Hiroshi
Fujisaki’s admittance of them, has brought additional howls from
blacks nationwide that the civil trial against Simpson is “fixed” and
that the news media and major talk show hosts are heavily biased
against Simpson.
DENNIS SCHATZMAN is a journalism professor in Los Angeles.
culate.
Dr. DuBois would have most
assuredly declared that the pro
motion of “Black English” as an
official language is to say that
illiteracy is OK for African
Americans. He would also
strongly denounce it as a condi
tion that is unacceptable in the
context of our struggle. He
would not retreat to a secondary
language that would imply in
any way, form or fashion that
we cannot compete with any
measure of inteUectual prowess.
Just as he did then, today. Dr.
DuBois would recognize that
English is the verbal currency of
commerce the world over. He
would have grave concerns
about Ebonics because he would
also know that so-caUed “Black
English” wQl not be the contex
tual language of the near 60
million people now using the
Internet to create a new venue
for a global economy.
No, in the end, William
Edward Burghardt DuBois
would not be happy to see an
investment in regression, occur
ring at the very dawn of
progress he foresaw and hoped
would be realized in his own
lifetime. He would promote a
language that stimulates
growth, opportunity and partici
pation in an ever expanding
socio-economic universe. Lest
we completely forget our com
mon sense, contemporaries con
cerned about African American
progress and that of the nation
as a whole, would be wise to do
the same.
SIDNEY MORSE of Los
Angeles is a strategic develop
ment consultant and the author
of “Strategic Progressivism-A
Solution For African-American
Empowerment.”
Parallels for black
empowerment
By Keith Hilton
SPECIAL TO THE POST
The Million Man March, like
the 1963 March on Washington,
was bigger than any one man,
however, four men deserve to be
recognized at this time - A.
Philip Randolph, Dr. Martin
Luther King Jr., the Most
Honorable Elijah Muhammad
and Minister Louis Farrakhan.
We strongly urge readers to
take the time to re-read Dr.
King’s entire “I Have a Dream”
speech. Don’t just recite the
sound bites that you/we hear
each January. As to the Million
Man March: You can’t separate
the message from the messen
ger. In other words, those who
were in favor of the 1995 March
should continue rallying around
Minister Farrakhan rather than
distancing themselves.
It should be noted that even
when pressured, Mandela
refused to denounce Castro,
Arafat, Gadhafi and others who
supported South Africa’s libera
tion movements. To paraphrase
attorney Johnnie Cochran, who
said in his closing arguments in
the 1995 O.J. Simpson trial, “If
you cannot believe the messen
ger, you must reject the mes
sage.” Therefore, ‘Tf you cannot
believe Minister Farrakhan,
then you must reject his correct
call for black re-empowerment.”
It is important to note that Dr.
King’s organization, the
Southern Christian Leadership
Conference was supportive and
right on stage at the Million
Man March.
If in 1995 SCLC remained
true to the legacy of King, then
it stands to reason that he
would be proud of his organiza
tion, the Nation of Islam and
the other groups that came
together on Oct. 16.
By 1968, five years after the
1963 March on Washington, Dr.
King, however, was also being
criticized by some groups that
praised him earlier. They didn’t
like the fact that he was
“straightening his black back”
when he opposed the Vietnam
War.
Some who now criticize
Farrakhan and evoke King’s
name also distanced themselves
from King because he made
such an “anti-American” state
ment; “...My nation is the great
est purveyor of violence in the
world.”
Those who say that the MMM
was bigger than one man are
correct, however, one man
stepped forward in the tradition
of Randolph, Delaney, 'Trotter,
Muhammad and Garvey and
initiated a call for re-empower
ment just as another man did
32 years earlier.
Although Minister Louis
Farrakhan continues to down
play his role in this march, he
deserves full credit for jump-
starting this event. Only the dis
ciplined, strong Fruit of Islam
could have organized such a
massive march.
“One million black men will
not be ignored,” he said. “We
must rise up in this time and
seize the hour, seize the
moment, because this moment
can never be again.”
Some may be surprised to find
that King’s message about black
empowerment was veiy consis
tent with that of Minister
Farrakhan’s speech about black
re-empowerment. The 1963
March on Washington was
about jobs and freedom. Yes,
racial equality was an impor
tant issue then and remains so
today, however, the March was
primarily about empowering the
black community.
KEITH HILTON is a syndi
cated columnist.
Letters To The Post
Police cameras
not the solution
The unfortunate incident
with the armed Police Officer
and the unarmed Mr. James
WiQie Cooper starts vrith one
basic principle, fear. This, I
think is the main issue.
We all, as humans, fear oth
ers at some time or another
who are different and possi
bly display identities of cer
tain profiles. These profiles
may include outrageous
attire, very unusual hair
styles, certain ages, sizes and
races of individuals. Fear
within a person may or may
not be changed/modified
through additional outside
stimuli, such as recognition
and awareness training. In
this culture, we should not
allow fear to govern all “legal”
actions. It does not in most
cases. Individuals involved in
violent behavior with another
person fear some type of con
sequence. Whether it’s fear
for personal safety, fear of los
ing something and/or fear for
the protection of another per
son or property.
In any case, logical, correct
and legal judgments should
take place. I hope that the
City of Charlotte is not send
ing the message that police
officers are god-like, where
there actions are above any
other citizen. I hope that the
City of Charlotte is not send
ing the message that a citizen
that fears a person, for what
ever reason and/or back
ground, can harm another
person because of that fear,
alone. From the reports on
the television, radio and
newsnaper, this citizen dis
played actions that probably
anyone of us in this city
would display. Should we be
met with a armed law
enforcement officer with fear,
I would hope not. I would
imagine if this incident
involved two citizens in the
middle of the street, one
would be dead and the other
would be charged and proba
bly convicted of first degree
murder. To put fear in its
proper perspective, would we
approve of the following;
1. A commercial pilot in fear
of his duties, pertaining to the
aircraft and other planes.
2. A surgeon in fear of
responsibilities that may be
incurred in the process of an
operation.
3. A chef in fear of the
preparation of a gourmet
meal.
Or 4. An armed police offi
cer in fear of the persons he is
suppose to serve and protect.
Wayne K Drake
Charlotte
Panthers do
Carolinas proud
Everyone across the USA
sportsworld seems sur
prised by the success of the
Carohna Panthers. The way
they are “cutting down” the
established teams in the
NFL is phenomenal. It has
never happened before. The
Panthers are unapologeti-
cally kicking butts and call
ing names, and making a
Carolinian shout, “This is
no fluke, bring ‘em on.”
No matter where they
come from all of the
Panthers to the man have
adopted that real Carolina
attitude. A kind of arro
gance that comes from the
soil, the smell of oak wood
burning, the water of
Carolina and its loyal peo
ple of North and South
Carolina.
Thomas H. McPhatter
San Diego, Calif.
What’s on
your mind?
Send your comments to The
Charlotte Post, P.O. Box
30144, Charlotte, N.C. 28230
or fax (704) 342-2160. You can
also use E-mail -
charpost@clt.mindspring.com
All correspondence must
include a daytime telephone
number for verification.