Newspapers / Washington Daily News (Washington, … / Sept. 25, 1914, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of Washington Daily News (Washington, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
UAlTltfi ATlMMMQn feawlVT lJoi.Tf thVpoatofflce I BfonehiactOA. N. C.. under the ec .Of March 8. lift. Rom Month...............,.8 >11 f Moor Months 1.0< P llx Months l.K Rom Tsar. ?. 0< h Subscribers oestrtnc tno paper die M soatinned will ylsaso notify this of [ Ice on date of expiration, otherwls I II will be continued at teenier ub Beoriptlon rates until notice to stop t It you Ao not set tne Dally Mswi R. promptly telephone or write thi r auutaier, and the complalrt will so B Solve Immediate attention. It Is on K desire to please you. 11 articles sent \o *ne z>ally Npwi L for publication must be sfsned b; L foe writer, otherwtee they wlU no 3 is published. * v " ? THE PROGRESS OF THE WAR. * Neither group of allios can yet b? | Pr aald to have won or lost. But It be gins to look as if the Germanic a! IK liance is doomed. Austria-Hungary's defense it i? broken; she seems to have little ? strength or spirit even for a last K' stand against Russia, and can give ? her ally no assistance. And as fai as Germany is concerned, the'event! Of the past week tend to convinc< m on lookers that nothing but a mlra E de can save har from final defeat. The retreat of the German arm lei t after their triumphant progress to ward Paris has not been an over whelming disaster. Dut It has do airoyed the German soldiers' belle! In their own invincibility. It hai broken the prestige of German mill tarlsm in the eyes of the world an< driven fear from tho hearts of thi allies. Every fighter against th< Teuton millions "now knows that Ger man soldiers are merely flesh an< blood and nerves lines themselves subject to exhaustion, discourage r ment and fear; they know that Ger ./ man officers. In spite of their superl training and traditions, are not su I premanent; they do not believe tha r Kaiser WUhelm is another Frederlcl tho Great. So, even If the German armlei form again on favorable ground ant ? the German line stands firm, fling1 ? back the allies and starts anothoi ^ march toward Paris, its raorc4< | will be weakened and iti strength lessened, while the alliei V will possess the advantage of confidence. well ?#quipped armies, fighting m * for their cause In a friendly and applauding country and reinforced un til their numerical strength is equal or superior to that of the invaders, .Moreover, the Germans have lost their most decisive battle?the tighl against time. The last three weeks at Liege. They lost three weeks more in the fruitless plunge toward Paris and the lieart-hreaklng retreat. V . Their aggressive power lessens with the lapse of every day. Meanwhile the French havo tardily got all their war forces Int.) the field and are drilling recruits by j," the hundred-thousands; the-English have poured big armies Into France and I3e]gi j.ii and are steadily drawing reinforcements from every cor ner or tliclr great empire; the RukBlons, now dealing the death-blow to Austria, are about to roil their vast armies against the defenders of East Prussia and begin the threatened progress to Berlin. In aplte of Germany's grim determination to win "even against a world of enemies," the case looks desperate. And If she achieves the Impossible against the present coalition. other nations are ready to take the field against her. PREPAREDNESS. Among all the stories of Germany's marvelous thoroughness in p. preparation for war. this one surely 'takes tho prize. It Is quoted from gf' ' a . dispatch written by John T. McPutcheon. tho Chicago Tribune war correspondent, with the German % army? "The Bame careful mind," he says, "that have evolved siege guns that Are dynamite shells Ave feet long , and fourteen inches In dii^neter, such as were -used at Liege, have worked out the apparently InsignlAjk cant but really Important detail of having two sets of suspender buttons | on the trouserB of soldiers, so that ! her failure to function nt ' ">?aeod not delay the man in his onward march." Wr An American army might swear to "take Paris or bust a suspender." 'But the German army, however mightily It strives, wHl preserve its I galluses intact and on the Job. COPYING THE KA1BRR. ^ The war spirit is contagious, and ! the examples set by belligorents in Kurop? are fap-mebiBg. ihus Gfcr I i > ^ Uneeda f Biscuit T?mpt the appetite,') please the taste and | nourish the body. . Crisp, clean and fresh. 5 cents. Round, thin, tender? -with a delightful flavor ?appropriate for luncheon, tea and dinner.- 1 to cents,' I Graham ? Crackers 4 Made of the finest 1 ingredients. Baked to perfection. The i national strength food, to cents. 1 1 Buy biscuit baked by NATIONAL BISCUIT 1 COMPANY > x I^nn/o tuws lui iuoi I I Z 1 c many, invading Belgium, found it advisable to make the Belgians con- 1' 3 tribute largo sums of money for the 1 German war chest. Whereupon a 1 . loyal New York German named 1 j Werner Rothkle, was inspired to do 1' 8 likewise according to his ability. *' 1 Rothkl invaded the residence of ^ a Belgian friend named Richard Rink, at New Kochelle, and ab- " j J stracted $54 from bis wallet, re1 * I placing the bills with a clipping from a German newspaper telling of the $40,000,000 fine imposed on Brus- ^ sols. Then he started back to New , York, with the lntentibiy of sending the money to the Kaiser to help pay 1G the war expenses. 17 On his way Rothkl happened to 17 meet up with an armed entral in j-y tho person of a policeman named McKeon. The German, being a * novice at the indcrrinity business, took fright at sight of tho officer ^ , and started to run, whereupon he. 10 was chased two miles, captured and lodged In jail. The only thing wrong with this ^0 German invasion of New Rochelle 20 wqb that the Invader lacked the 20 courage of his convictions. If he 21* had been as certain as Kaiser Wil- 21 helm that he had a divine right to FIRST ISJ TO THE FARMERS:The busini cotton storage warehou, Tor which a negotiable can bring this warehoui and they will advance 3 to harvest your crops 1 absolutely necessary tt Do not sell for less tt men of Washington and 1 . by a united effort you THE WAREHOUSE W DO NOT SELL YOU PER POUND. I ' , , ,?4 " ' ' '*-'fc-ShfriL r? 4j V OTp' . -:*rS ... . Wk'M nr*nim TPPV SI TO R10 R COMtT 38?Mar; J. Pilley-vs. Jno. L. Roper Lumber cO. 40?State ex rei. Fred. Kelt; vs. B. B. Nicholson et als. 40?C. Morgan Williams and Jos. F. Taylor vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. 47?C. T. Hardison vs. Kugler Lumber Co. Thad. Hodges vs. Pamlico Brick & Tile Co. Stephen Foreman vs. Eureka Lumber Co. 67?S. Fleming vs. Washington * Vandemcre R. R. Co. Hhrriacm & Phillips vs. A. W. Cherry. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1914. 59?Mrs. E. F. Long et als. vs. R. W. Adams. (14?Waltbam Piano Co. vs. E. L. Dawenn. 68?M. O. Cratt vs. Wm. U. Leggett et als, , 72?W. C. Miller vs. R. W. Smith. . .rjjpffj,' j 75?Isaac WiBU and wife vs. R. P. Forrest. 86?Jus, E. Watemv!.VS".M. 1 Woodhfbuse Elkelric'Co. vs. Wa?btagtoB$I$lor Car Co. 88?S. P. Willis vs. -Norfolk Southern It. H. Co. 90?Wm. Deichea A Co. vs. Itelhsvon DnigfUo. 91?J as. Bailey <t-Soq va. Belbaven Drug Ctw^ . . 12?Sawyer Grocery Co. vs. Belhaven Drug Co. 115?Williams, Martin k Gray vs. Belhaven Drug Co. 194?The Kemper k Thomas Co. va. E. B. Butt*. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1914. ' , 116?Samuel H. Perry vs. Interstate Cooperage Co. 197?O. K. Stilley et al. vs. S. R. Fowle & Son. 110?North Stale Mutual & Provident Asao. vs. Edmund Edwards ct als. _ _ 194?Carolina Distributing Co. va. W, 4, Moore <* als. IH)5?J. H. Clark vs. Whitehurst c* ?1. I Pamlico Chemical Co. vs. J. D. Davis. FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1914. H)9?J. 11. Price vs. Howard Winfield. ll?Kim City Lumber Co. vs. Washington Horse Exchange Co Hlii?Elm City Lumber Co. vs. A. J. Cox & CoT Hi 6?Joint Mayo et als. vb. Norfolk Southern R. R. Hl9?Allie C. Manning vs. Ernest Daughtridge. I MONDAY, OCTOBERJ2^1gl4. 18?Edgar Griffin vs. David R. Hardison. 20?Jesse H. & Beatrice A. Chauncey vs. Eureka Lumber Co. 30?S. II. Gay vs. Jesso B. Tetterton. 37?L. H. Hardison et als. vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. 3^?Eva Cooper et als. vs. R. T. Cratch et als. 39?J. A. Carter^^rflL, vs. Wm. M. Walker. TnSSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1014. 10?Dixie Lumber Co. vs. Gray Harris. 11?Charley Wilkinson vs. Gray Harrift. 13?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L R R. Co. 11?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L. R. R. Co. ^ 15?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L. R. R. Oo. 10?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L. R. R. Co. 17?Southern Furniture Co. Vs. A. C. L. R. R. Co. 18?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L. R. R. Co. 19?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L. R R. Co. >0?Southern Furniture Co. vs. A. C. L- R. R. Co. >1?C. C. Daniels vs. John W. Charles. >9?Knight Buggy Co. vs. G. I. Bonner et als. >0?McKeel-Richardson Hdw. Co. vs. R. E. Grimes and Oliver Credle. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1914. fig G?Geo. R. Lane vs. S. R. Fowle & Son. 0?Donnie V. Ecklin et al. vs. H. W. Carrow at als. 7?W. R. Cratt vs. W. B. Lilly. 8?M. G. Cratt vs. W. B. Lilly. 9?J. F. Latham vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. ~~9 1 T./v> ft.itk.S~ il. - T T? TS . . ?ia. vf. ?j . x>. uanieis. 8?Southern Furniture Co. vs. James Black and wife. 2?International Harvester Co. vs. W. E. Skittlothorpe et aL ^ THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1914; i? 2?Me* Maggie Roid et als. vs. Western Union Telegraph-Co 8?C. H. Batenian vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. 9?Thurman Bateman vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. ' 0?Loon a Bateman vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. 1?Truemiller Bateman vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. 2?Irene Batenian vs. Norfolk Southern R. R. Co. ATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON. * ** i'-zJ \ '* ass men of Washington are building a as In which you oan 8tor3 your ootton, warehouse reoelpt will be Issued. You se receipt to the First National Bank, rou $30.00 a bale. This will enable you 3j and meet pressing obligations. It Is lat your ootton be kept off the market. J ion ten cents per pountK The business 1 .his Bank will co-dr^rcte rlth yen, and ,J will get s-r.ir i: ice for your cotton. ... e ILL BE COMPLETED BY NOVEMBER 1. fa R COTTON FOP T.FBS TU?v m ? * ? I I A. M. Dumay I i Cashier. j 237?F. E. EoUi0.^ aVlslt!'.'^ akl 241?J. H. Ricks, <hardian, vs. N. L. Sawyer. Trustee. 243?-Isaiah Bishop^ vs. J. F. Cto^J.R Bishop. I 25^1^! HoLfe?^J. U. Powers et al. 256?-George Adier vr, Norfolk Southern R R. Oo. 264?Riley II. Edward* vs. H. H. Proctor and L. Holliday. 261?Emily Jeukina ct al. v?. J. J. Hodges. 266?Adelino Wilder vs. Edward Wildor. 270?A. Singleton Wallace vs. Rosa Cherry ct al*. . I 270?A. Singleton Wallace vs. Rosa Cherry et als. 273?W. T. Farrow et al. vs. N. B. Dawsrlu and G. A. Staneill. I 278?Washington Horse Ex. Co. vs. J. T. Moore. Sawyer Grocery Co. vs. Grant Wilkinson. Clande T. CWjiy vs. IS. F, ^Ihdley and interstate Cooper agnOo. . "r MOTION DOCKET I - ??8. R Fowlc vs. W. H-. WhiHov andi I>. t>. Wdrrth. 0?Johh W. Terry et ak Vs. Ch*s. Wtichart et its: 8?North State Piano Cb. vs. W. j. Cbfietd. IS?Richard TarkingtonVa. 6. T. Sparrow. 14?James Gardner vs. Jonathan Havens. I 15?J. M. Holt va W. A. Cratch. IT?A. C. L. R. R Co. vs. WiAihgtoh Horse Exchange Co. 22?Mrs. Bet tie Lee Short-vs. A. M. Harris. 25?6. ft. White Som vs." N. 8. Fulford Hdw. Co. et nL 26?James H. Hicks vs. H. S. Ward et als. 20?Barrett Mfg. Co. et als. vs. N. 8. Fnlford Hdw. Co. 89?Joe. F. Tayloe ct als. vs. N. S. R R. Co. I 41?Claudia A. Singleton et al. vs. M. L. Cherry et als. 43?ft. 6. Noal vs. Oaniden Ferry Oo. 45?Jennie F-. Brifeson vs. E. H. Moore. I 57?S. Fleming vs. Washington A Vandemcre R R Co. ou?jure. js. jr. long et als-v*. R W. A duns. 81?H. B. Phillip* vs. W. W. Hill. 63?-Geo. N. Howard vs. Norfolk Southern R R Co. 66?Chaa. L. Morton vs. Washington Light & Water Co. 87?W.^B. Morton 4 Co. vs. Washington Light 4 Water Co. 70?Jesse F. Keech et als. vs. Jno. L. Roper Lumh?r Co. 76?A. 0. Gurganus ot al. vs. Norfolk Bouthorn R R Do. 77?-Jos. E. Waters vs. Norfolk Southern R R Co. 78?Jno. W. Ashy and wife vs. Norfolk Southern R R Co. 82?J as. McCoy vs. T. A. Brooks. 102?W. 8. p. Eborn and wifs Vs. Southern Ry. Co. et als. 103?James McCoy and Thomas Keech vs. N. D. Wallace et al 108?Equitable Mqf. Co. Vs. R. G. Sparro#. ,, 110?Orlando Jones vs. Norfolk Southern R R C\>. 117?City at Wellington vs. Washington Light i Water Dot 124?Benjamin Leary et al vs. Girls Lumber tfe. 125-?Sylvester Swindell Vs. H. B. Riiss shd W. 7. Sears. 138?J. B. Woolard Vs. fi. G. Ruse and W. J. Sean. 127'?MoWis Rail vs. H. G. Run and W. J. Scan. 185?Redmond Grist vs. Ellen Grist. 142?Mary M. Alligood et als. vs. Ira J. Alligood. 161?Clyde Smith va. N. 8. R R Co. et aL iox?p. ?1. Johnson vs. N. 8. R. R. Co. et at. *168?A. Miller vs. N. S. R. R. Co. et ah 164?F. P. Latham ya. N. S. R. R. Coi et al 172?Albert Waters, Admr.? vs. N. 8. R. R. Co. 180?C. C. N. Cutler vs. Mary A. H. Cutler et als. 187?E. A. Daniel, Jr., vs. Wesley Peebles. 100?Raymond Maxwell vs N. S. It- 11. Co. 195?Geo. J. Studdert vs. Capital Tailoring Co. 107?H. B. Williams and wife vs. Dixie Lumber Co. 205?John R. Perry vs. Ethelbert Guilford. 266?Farris Holland vs. Ethelbert Guilford. 210?J. B. Jefferson vs. N. S. R. R. Co. 281?Arthur C. Ormond, Admr., vs. Joshua W. Mills. 228?Lynchburg Shoe Co. vs E. C. Cayton. 227?J. H. Ricks vs. W. E. Matthews, 230?Washington Buggy Co. vs. Davidson Hdw. Co. et al. 234?S. P. Willis et als. vs. H. B. and Annie E. Williams, 240?Sarah It. Jackson vs. Charlotte Ann Elisabeth Hardison et als 244?Lynchburg Shoe Co. vs. T. Litchfield. 249?E. L. Dawson vs. The Starr Piano Co. 250?Daniel Miller A Co. vs. Jae. E. Clark Co. 258?F. H. VonEberatein vs. Southern Investment Co, 289?James Graddy vs. Southern Express Co. F. T. Phillips vs. Foreign Products Co. Howard Woolard vs. D. T. Woolard et aL W, H. French vs. JohnTL Small. ,, i , ?i < Arrow Iver Johnson, Reading (t ox.x. a, k Standard, Emblem, Hudson ?fWiT^Trtr(KftFf Ute. >ayton and Great Western . Hcyclcs sold for cash or on * * ime We also have the * " * nost complete repair shop . . a the city all work guaran- wUmoro*, *. o. Bed. d. r. cutler ~ Phone Ml . ^ M A D . ^ t?S|Il^i:. rrr> ^ *11 "' " :" *f":*'- * jfeiV*'fey ,* ? I kTM?I iE?4?M tniTvamAxr. I * I ROBERT S. WRIGHT . Ihiblic Stenographer I WmfcigLji^nM VT /"? was/annum. ? j1 ' E Oillo Rodnao Bid*. Phooa 44 Uk*M M. N. BERRY How, Teed Jf v WuhlagtoB N. C. .......... DB. ERNEST W. DUNN, OSTEOPATHIC PHYSICIAN. Cfcrooto ul Narrsu DIMM nitri>itr * BOM US* TdMcUr, 11:00 a. m. to 11:30 ' 1:00 p. m. to 4:00 7:10 p. m. to 1:10 Thutdar. 4:10 p. a to 1:10 7:10 p. ?*. to 1:10 PTldv. *-11:10, 1:10-1:^0 ...... 4 tr. I. - * - vx ' SmMONB 40 VAFOHAN ? IW-UmcKm, M. O* ??.aa. MAM, run, SWMIf I >T ?* "T*!* n ?kro,Mw Ma I. ? odma* a aoaxaa, < . . Wart, HaIm O. art? WAMD a O RIMES AWmaa)' ! law. wiltimi?. a. o. Wa |M Uw Ooart 1 UH Nkral OoarM. : #. edwaro fa. arrww in, " "Mlrtlaw. WMkfcwiaB, a. o. w >i an . a. o, - m : ? m> m- miZm Hp ? HARBT MTHVLLAI, AMcwwr M law, M'? i i *m.t uL*u*m. ?. 7 m1 pp * - *. t W 9 9 m g ' U, A. DMM.IT. J, a ??! ! ? ; ^a^a?^j^ar.^aiyia ; V*;: - I ... I I fc "*!*)' i :".i" ' A. D. tab., WMlllHM, W o. y JJ'.Sssifi ( tmnAi ?i f , tmn Ml WMtllW, . O, ' * Mn utllkarta. FH-. Tlx. fl?to to th. mo.t uuiiurta. toh
Washington Daily News (Washington, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
Sept. 25, 1914, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75