Newspapers / The Caucasian (Clinton, N.C.) / March 28, 1901, edition 1 / Page 2
Part of The Caucasian (Clinton, N.C.) / About this page
This page has errors
The date, title, or page description is wrong
This page has harmful content
This page contains sensitive or offensive material
THE CAUCASIAN PUBLISHED KVKKY TI1UR8IA BY THE CAUCASIAN PUB. CO. SUBSCRIPTION RATES. Oaa Year, la Mootka, Tkrea Moolbs, I. (HI 86 TIIK CUIKr JUHTICK TKSTIKIK. The testimony of Cnief Jotce Forehts ehould convince any co prejadiced pron that the eoait .id not intend to violate the cmatitutioD wilfully and deliberately. In what they did in reude ring ibe decialon in the 'office holding" aia there is no doubt in the mtnda of honeat, fairminded men that tbt- court were actuated by the bU'b'st and best motivea, and that they per formed this duty fearlewly and con oienttoualy. The teatimony of the veneram Chief Justice ahowa tbat in to onr whelming number of caeea the court decided that the Democratic office holdera could not be ousted, ben. e it I is abaurd toaay mat me couri partitan in their decimona. Toej never allowed party eouaidrratiout. to enter ht a factor. Tney follow d the decision of tbe court tor n't jeara, holding that a peraon elected for a term of yearn could not be ous ted until the expiration of the time peciled ; that the party holding tbe office had acquired a property right I therein. Whn the court in 1U7 afflmed this doctrine tbey were heartily praised by the Democratic pre sa bo cause it meant tbat certain Demo erats would be allowed to hold their offl sea, which the legislature sought to take from thorn. Bat when this fame doctrine wa held by the court and it meant the retention in effioe of some Hepuoli cans and Populists a mighty howl was raised by the Democratic precs, they asserting that the court were I rendering partisan decisions It was all right so long as the de cisions kept Democrats in fflce, but, In their eyes, it was grossly wrong when their political opponents prof ited by the affirmance of the same doctrine. The Simmons machine in their at tempt to destroy the confidence of the masses in their highest court, have made themselves rediculous in the minds of conserva1 ie, just, lib eral and falr-thinkiurf men. The wholo impeach me it procrt d ings were instituted for the purpose of persecution, and to make the court Democratic and subservent to the corrupt machine. Their con temptable purpose to pack the court X' ileaTo? the constitutional amendment, and their desire is to pak the court with men who will bow to the will oi the maon.ne. xuey aeem to itirge. uow- RTAr. th &t tha amendment can be tested in the Federal Courts, as there is a Federal question involved tiik TRKA8UHY may be bank- nui-r. With Democratic legislature of 189U and 1911 the people who pay the taxes to suonort their Stat. ?ovfirnmflnt r r two years tne otaio is overwneimoa witn aeoc Tne mate Treasury is now without adequate funds to meet all the demand, and it is ex- nftt-dlnirlr dnnhtfnl If tha rnvamiA oeeaiogiy aouDtiui it tne revenue measure recently enacted will bring into the Treasury sufficient funds to meet the Indebtedness. Kut the neonl will noon hav an r oanortunltv to aiv whthr nr not r ujr v olvsswsTaiBuiB w Continue. . They will soon have an opportu- ... uu,.UM, wuBiuururuoi meyae- sire to have the State government BaminiBterea dv uevoiuuonists. Itloters and Redshirts, or by hon- fiat, llbnral. iut . hirh.tn .n ' O conservative business men and farmers, If thA nr. ant mfhnH. t continue Indefinitely, then indeed, the grand old Commonwealth has a graua oia uummonweaitn nas f. II-nflnri--irllkAn4iaM.. ma-. ....VU u.uuo -uu uuu wyn times. It behooves all men who desire less burdens, more honesty and de cency in politics, to unity on a com mon basis to defeat the present monocracy. TO DISFRANCHISE IS MARYLAND, The Maryland legislature, now Democratic, has been called into ex traordinary session for the purpose of passing an election law to enable the Democrats to obtain permanent control of that Sute. The law, as ptopos d by Ex-Sena- ator Gorman, who is Ihtiag for re election to the Senate, will have the effect of disfranchising by impodng an eaucauonai quanncation, about WU4aw W4 fcUW l,"ai DUS on ni sroresaid provisions of the Consti 25,000 negro voters and 18,000 ilht- Kreatest that has been made in I tution ; whereby the said David M. erate white voters. The legislature of Mayland intends to do boldly and directly what the N .ith Carolina redshirts have done by indirection. The latter knew that the "grandfa ther clanae" will ha ktmck, ri nnf h J the conrta. leavinir th rAn..;n stand, thus disfranchising whites as well as blacks. Maryland has fiye white yotei to every negro voter, and like North Carolina, is in no danger of "nigger domination." Bnt the tricksters want the offices and that's the secret of the whole tbing. Howdoyou like the three R'a t For the sake of decency and the pre- thrown b men, and the oppor ervation of the arood name of North tuni'y will soon be offered to re- Carolina, it is time that all men who do not endorse the anarchistic meth- odi, to come together la order to oust the rioters, redshirts and revolution- tiociati. TIIK Jt'IKir- WILL NOT HE - vhtki. A Tflt ('At''AJl! go- to -rw.f tb fimu, d we rny y n'a mu lni cbuent trla' m r in Its clot The testimony "d the learned and powerful aru menu niad by the counel fo' th defenee are o convlnclog ard uh neWratlM tbat it now i.-n a j poaitlvelj certain aa anything can I be tbat theSenat-though overwbel- betbattbecenai-iDOHBuuYri.M- mlngly Democratic will not dare to vote for conviction It J" clear to ua that at thn beginning of I ih,trlkl there waa a determination to convict. Tbe HlmmomT machine has to all app-arances exerud Its- elf to tbe utmost to keep Henators jon whipped Into line In spite of the I fata. law and arguments produced to show thai they could not vote for conviction unless mey moav . w A outrageously violated their oatns of office. The Henate is strongly . t Democratic, but If sufficient 8ena tors break away from the macbini to make one-third opposed to con viction, then tbe monstrous prtl- aQ frfTort of the political machine will bo thwarted We bad Intended to bold back this liHuo of The Caucasian until the verdict had pen rendered, but the arguments of counsel nave lieen extended longer than was an- tlcipated, and, therefore,it ba.omes necossary for tho paper to go to1 . I nniin1 It was with Croat difficult V oijp readerg wnat the r 8Ult rtrft&a. WA tnmt. nOWBvBr. we Csu l will be as confidently as If we wait- ed until it was announced. I In another column we give ex-1 tracts from some of the speeches I for the defenso which to a certain extent set forth the gist of tbe law, t.a h ari.munin ,hirh i it i , , . . nata I make It impossible for the Senate 10 coavici. ibb tAtoAsuw uH iuu reports of some of these able and I masterly efforts and will in the I next Usue publish them In Ml or make liberal extracts therefrom. haye much more say l about this trial In the future. Buf-I flfoUtiiMv for th nmaant that ... . uf .-1,1,1, a I this impeachment trial, which is nothing more nor less than a ma - llgnant. partisan, political persecu-l tlon, presents the most monstrous! situation that has ever been seen ., , . in tuis or any oiner oiaie. l tlon. u. M- uook, ine Democratic i Ex Secretary of State, said as much I in his magnificent speech for tho defense. Ex-Governor Jarvis said - even more wnen ne turnea ana I looked tbe Senators in the face and I asked : M Would you dare Impeach "The Supreme Court shall have a Democratic Judge for doing yfhtit0J ltio Jo hear claims " I oiVQlnar. tha Nrarn rkii i ra filaiAti thee judges have done?" He said more, oecause ne lniimacea mat i thav nraro nnt nnlv oflomnt I n cr fcn I '".Peach the. for parUsan po.m- cm reasons, out mat iuy wore uu lng it for the further, purpose of getting the offices for the henchmen f fc 8immons machlno. uiv,a.u. e might say and say truthful 1 n :.l- I i.1 ij, uuUW mw.w wuuiuuui, n mesw judges are impeached and tho Sim mons machine offers the judgeships thus made vacant to their Demo- an insult to any man oi nonor, be- lng the same as saying that we ex Pct you when on the bench to ren- I J 4 1 I . 1 tl che8 and Douglas for deciding caus- w xsin uuv tv v mm v sj u wvuvu a. wa es according to the law and facts. However this matter is determ- ln?i flay 01 reconing is coming, 7 .a.waU .uu inst onlA of North fjapolln wm neither condone the conviction of these judges nor the attempt to convict them, to say nothing of the wienenB auu revolutionary con- I fluff nf t,h Stmmnna ma.o h I no ' ouPihiix vourW I oitLT A PARTIAL rUL.FILL.MBNT. I I -r,. , . .. i aiih vjfret.ix.ru reie?rim nnian thla w. v . rt. is .mm ih.t. Mr r.M0n Winston will be appointed a judge or one or tne new isnnorlor lYmrt, districts, we take this to be only partial luiniimeni or Mr. win- ,ml.UIA. T. mill V,. r..nl1. ZlrX:-'::Z: in Vinri:; ho . in,w .nrt hha tha hi,.i- w,th Solicitor George H. White, colored- If he is to be judge, It is . v-.t , n,m k 1 I - - ... I congenial association in making nis rounas oi tne conns." WHERE WAS MOSES f Just after the vote of the Senate acquitting the judges, Dr. Thompson met Dr. Everett on Favettevilla St.. where the following eonversation oe- enrred: Dr. Thompson "Where was Mo- Ses when the light went ontt" Dr. Everett. '-In the News Ob- server office." The speech of Hon. P. I. Osborne Iorna defense in the impeachment trial wa9 not only one of tne most eloquent, masterly and convincing arguments delive.ed during the North Carolina for many a day. If the result of the trial is determln- d by law and logic and Kccording lo Jace ana ngnt men ne will nave tne satisfaction of knowing that this speech nlaved no email part in savine the State from th Btaln of a conviction of two upright and honest Judges in a most mallg. nank an lnfamoue persecution. Do the honest farmers and bnsi nes8 men want tQe 8tate to be ruled oy the Revolutionkta, Eiotera and rteasnirtsT Tney have seen the an- arca7 into which the State has been 8tore K9oA aTovernment by law and orer - The article on "Maryland Suff- rage" will be concluded In our next Issue. 1 ' Tiir; Cah am ax -t-ix its preas to i announce tbe rult of the great and iiifatnmi ini-3icbiiient trial. At one o'clwk It-lay tbe moment um vote was taken by tbe Fenate filling at a high court of lmiach- rm.t. The re-ult an over- whelm log acquittal of Chief Justice prchns and Ah'ociate Douglas of tfae IJ8rtLQ jm,cbment tbargt miMe b tto ,loiMe. The vote wi uken Just aiw IIon. c. B. Watao ...,, tmfiiM lm.cbment tbarcea art abton L..I . hitter irtlunn iir-U-a-H ftf - - four hours, pleading for conviction But hi appeal to benator to vote party linen could not overcome the masterful and unanaweiable Htihes of Hon. F. I. Lone and otnerB for the defense. When the roll call beiran it waa a t " ' . Hundred kept a cloMe tally ot the vote and every one listened with the most Intent intercut to the answer of each Senator as UU name was called. Before the roll call waa more than hall through it was evi dent that tbe Simmons machine had not auje to wnip into line the 34 yoteH nfXfMry for conviction, . t. onthtwt nr th that a great outburst of applause " could be suppressed. The first vote was, of course, taken on the first article of impeach merit, which is as follows: That at the tlm Hereinafter named, to-wlt, on or about the 17th . fVwnW. a. n . looo t Rnd jn the city of Raleigh, the said Da vid M. Furches, now Chief Justice, who was then an Associate Justice oUh. Supreme Court ol North c.r- Douglas, who was then, and is now, an Associate Justice of the Su- preme Court of North Carolina, and one other member of the said Su preme Court of North Carolina, now 5eceased. c0ncurrin therein, con- gtltuting a majority of said 8u preme Court of North Carolina, un mindful of the high duties of their omce.8' Si r ?"n801 ana. uuiuiuuiui ui Liiw uuuiitnuuun ui fche gtlifce of M0rth Carolina, and as pecially Artiele I, section 8 ''The Legislative, Executive, and l supreme juaiciai powers oi tne IIJ iT6Jfl . T 19 1 m a BDuaiaurj auu uisiiuvii xi ill eavu other And also Article IV, section 9. 8hall be merely 'recommendatory; no process in the nature of excu tion Shall lSSUfi thftrftOn ! thfiV filial 1 Assembly tion And also Article XIV, section 3. "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of appropriations made by law ; and an &(. unitA p.f!Aiint nf tha ronninta i : .,.- and expenditures of the nublic mon ley shall be annually published:" under the color of their aforesaid Prices, nniawruuy, wuiuiiy and in of North Carolina, and the laws I passed in pursuance thereof, In certain controversy submitted with Inn -. I A . O 1 rt - M v w vi vu Carolina, seotlons 567 and 568. enti I tied Theophilus White v. Hal W Ay. r state Auditor, and W. H, Worth, irensurar, penaing on appeal oI. o.,. ' !T n.,- i vtI-. Caro.ina, and decided by the said Supreme Court on appeal at the February Term, 1900, thereof, caus- ea SO re issued by Thomas 8. Ke lmn riir .!- o . I m ft. n n 0.1TI tl Q vrha In nnvH a onH fl UreS following, tO Wit I ' I rWrit iarmtta1 nti Annn .. --- wu bwuiwi wi hd length. That, pursuant to the command contained in the aforesaid writ of manaamus issuea to said Hal w. Ayer, state Auditor, the sum of eleht hundred and thirtv-onft and I - ... 101UU aollaM wa3 unlawfully audit- an? allwea by said HalW. Ayer Btate Auditor, and a warrant J V?"8 by said Hal AV.Ayer, State Auditor, In wnnk on. I flmiroo CnliA.!.;.,,. t. wit: rr.m, nf , ua - Which said warrant was subse quently, on the 22d day of October, 19. 0, pursuant to the command contained in the aforesaid writ o mandamus, directed to said W. H. 5?h.I& "nJftS?!- ly paid by said W. H. Worrh. State Treasurer, out of tha fnndu fn hi a hands as State Treasurer, belone- lng to the State of North Carolina, wu?ou? any appropriation being maae Dy jaw ior tne payment thereof, to aforesaid Theophilus wnt8 were unlawfully Issued as aforesaid, with the intent thereby to compel, by process In the nature ? ?Sifcl! U t??JSent I :Se StetSSUflfto 3 White ; which aforesaid mandamus marches, then Associate Justice 5 MfS' SSL.?1? Tid tiotof toe SmoSNoS Carolina, did then and there com I mlt aQd were guilty of, a high crime and misdemeanor in office. The "suit of the vote was 27 to 23, which was seven short of a sufll cient number to convict. The vote in detail was as follows : For conviction: Messrs. Alex ander, Arlington, , Aycock, Bray arougnton, Burroughs, Calvert, Foy, Gudger, James, Justice, Li nd say, McNeill, Miller of Pamlico, Morrison, Morton, Scott, Smith epeignt, Thomas, Travis, Vann Ward, Warren, Webb, Wood, and Woodward. For acquittal : Messrs. Brown Buchanan, Candler, Crisp, Currie, TIIK JUIMiH Ai'MlITTEU. Dula, Foashee, Glenn, Henderson, v- l naili 1 rtttm f i Vi at ! McAUUter, Mclntoah. Mc In tire, Michael, MUUr of Caldwell, Plnnlx, Eobeaon, gt.keleather and Hugg This was a tt vote and settled the w ho'.e matter. 1 he pronator i,.h relied uoon convicting the Judges on tbe flrt article, if on no othr. It waa clear 10 them that they would be weaker and tbat the Judgea would be stronger on the vote on every other article, ao Ur lah Heap Allen, ch ef mogul of the prosecutor., quickly roe and sug gested that the other charges be withdrawn. But- this was not agreed to, and a roll call was pro- cMdad with on each of the other four articles of impeachment. On tha second article the vote was 26 for acquittal and 24 for con etrttnn. a train of thre for the Judges. On the third article the vote was the same 26 to 24. On the fourth article the od was 25 to 25 a gain of two votes for the Judges. On the 5th and last article the vote was 34 for acquittal to 16 for conviction a gain of 11 votes for the judges, and 18 votes lees than the number necessary to convict. In short, the Judges got a two-thirds vote of the Senate, which was enough to convict the House of ma king false, partisan and malicious charges against the judges. When the final result was an nounced and a motion was made to adjourn the great mass of intense humanity in the galleries and in lobby that had followed closely the whole outrageous proceeding ex pressed their pent-up feelings in approval for the result and in con demnat'on of the impeachment proceedings by a spontaneous and loud outburst of applause. Then happened a remarkable scene, it seemed tnat nearly every body in tho Senate Chamber rugh.. I ed toward the judges and pressed around them eagerly tobhako their hands and congratulate them and to congratulate the State. It was a great ovation. This should, and we believe it will, teach a wholesome lesson to any partisan majority in the fu ture that is so drunk with power as to dare to attempt such high handed and revolutionary meas ures, not only to disgrace upright and honorable judges, but to gain for themselves and their henchmen offices and power. In the mean time unless the temper of the peo ple of North Carolina has materi ally changed they will pass j udg ment soon upon this Simmons, red snirt, revolutionary machine. In this instance justice has triumphed and the good name of North Caroli na has been preserved. As to the next point that the legislature had specifically instruc ted the Treasurer to pay White, I wish to say that the legislature had no power to prohibit the payment, having made the appropriation and commanded the duties to be performed. Indeed, the act of the legislature declaring that this sala ry should not be paid is unconsti tutional. All the courts agree that a legislature cannot require an offi cer to perform certain duties and then starve him out by taking from him all of the salary to compensate him for the performance of said du ties. (At this point Mr. Osborne cited numerous authorities ) There fore, this question is put behind us, and, consequently, according to the doctrine laid down by the prosecu tion, it was not only the right, but the duty of these judges to order the mandamus to issue. It is evident that a larger and larger majority of the people of the State are reaching the conclusion that the judges should not be con victed, and we also feel safe in say ing that the same sentiment Is grow ing in the Senate. Everybody seems to realize this except James Haffidavit Pou, Uriah Heap Allen, Itedshirt Simmons, and Camelian Buffalo Daniels. They .are inflated and intoxicated with the idea that they own the State, and since their redshirt, revolutionary and sanguin ary campaign ended in a victory of force and fraud, they cannot see why they should not take all the re maining offices by fraud, force or any other methods that their un-conscience-checked rapacity may de sire. The tide is already turning and they will soon learn what the people of the State, think of them and their methods. Any one who will read the able speech of Judge Bynum in defense of the Justices will be convinced that the whole Impeachment pro ceedings are absolutely without foundation of fact. Ass legal ar gument his speech deserves to rank with the best ever delivered. One of the burning questions of the day with a certain editor in t he State is whether it is worse to be called "cur" or a 'Buffalo calf." p-i, nmnnr nninsiftvrn til-rmiwii: Miuioitn Commends Perunato His Friends as a Positive Catarrh Remedy. ' 8c 7 J - Ben. Celso CsMar Mereae, Ex.Prlme Minister ef Hawaii. Tbe Hon. Celso Caaaar Moreno, ex-Prime Mlniatar of Hawaii, and projector of the Trans-Pacific cable, 1876, is a distinguished atateaman, and tbe beat known Italian in the country. In a letter from Washington, D. C, to the Pernna Med icine Co., he aays : "lean commend your great national catarrh cure, Peruna, to my Mends throughout tbe country as a safe, reliable medicine. I know ot no other tonic that will build a person up as well as Peruna. It Is a positive cure for tbe universal disease, catarrh, and those who will try this remarkable medicine will find a sure cure. Very respectfully, Hon. F. I. Osborne, who made one of the most powerful if not the most powerful speech for the de fense, indeed, in our opinion the most powerful speech on either side, covered the whole ground. We wish in this connection, however, simply to call attention to his argu A 1 11. t 1A 3 J-A . ment to show the right and duty of the judges to ifsue the mandamus. We will not attempt now to quote Mr. Osborne in his own words, for we will publish it literally in an other issue, but in substance on this subject he said: You say that you should impeach these judges fcr issuing the man damus ordering the Treasurer to pay the salary of White in obedience to the judgment of the court, even if you could do it on no other grounds. You admit that there are cases where a mandamus can issue, but yon con tend that the judges are impeach able in this case for issuing the man damus, first, because there had been no appropriation out of which to pay White's salary, and, second, be cause the legislature had passed a specific act prohibiting the Treasurer to pay his salary. Now let us see. The legislature attempted to abolish White's office, but it at once pro ceeded to recreate the office and to place other persons in power to per form similar duties, and that act thus recreating the office made an appropriation to pay for the per formance of the duties of the office. So, when the court declared, as it was bound to do under the doctrine of Hoke vs. Henderson, that the action of the legislature was uncon stitutional in removing White, and inasmucn as tne omce tney once abolished had been recreated, that White was still the officer to per form the duties under the new act, then White became entitled to the salary or compensation fixed in the new act for which that act made a specific appropriation. Therefore, there was an appropriation to pay for the performance of the duties of shell fish commissioner, and the court not only had the right, but it was its duty to issue the mandamus ordering the Treasurer to pay White, the man who had performed the duties. This is a sufficient answer to their contention, and puts that phase of the question behind us. TRIAL OF THE JUDGES. (Continued from First Page.) property in North Carolina, and the decision was based on the case of Hoke vs. Henderson." Alter reviewmgme wmte vs. Auditor and other similar case.-, umei Justice Montgomery was asked: Q. "Now who concurred in the next case, White vs. Auditor?" A. "The respondents and Chief Justice Faircloth. Dissenting opin ions were written by Justice Clark and myself." H- "were tney on tne same grounds?" "Not at all." The witness then stated the diff erence as already testified to and re ported the witness adding that he did not desire to approach a conflict between two departments of the State Government when he could avoid it. Q. "State what occurred after that in respect to issuing of the writ. A. "I "Will do so, though it is not at all pleasant to me. Continu ing, the witness then said: "On the day or day after Judge Clark filed his dissent in the case of of White against the Auditor, I was going, home in the afternoon and met Governor Russell and Treasurer Worth. I joined them. I did not open the discussion . of the matter OF Hawaiian mm . Celso Caesar Moreno. but our conversation soon got on the dissentii g opinion of Judge Clark. Mr. Worth said that Judge Clark had just left his office and threaten ed and brought every influence to bear to keep him from paying the money for White's claim, saying that he would be impeacned and his bondsmen held liable and if it was paid there would be three vacant chairs in the Supreme Court w hen the Legislature met in June. This conversation was In may. I knew that Judge Clark and Mr. Worth were friendly, and a.-ked if h invi ted him. He said Judge Clark came to his office of his own accord and told him this. I aked: "Well, did you ever hear of such a thing before?' He said he never did. " 'What are you going to do?' I asked. "Mr. Worth eald, 'Follow the court.' "This was in May and I may have mentioned it to some one and refer red to Judge Clark's act as unbecom ing. "I said, 'Why don't you go before the clerk to issue this process, and if he does not then the court can act.' Harris went away. "When Colonel Kenan came In and asked about the writ. I said: 'When this comes before open court on motion you will hear from me.' "When Colonel Kenan came be fore the conference later and a-ked advice, Judge Furches answered promptly: 'issue the writ, the case justifies it and it is your duty.' Judge Douglas was not so positive. "Colonel Kenan was not satisfied and came back later, and I said, Don't issue it; you know my dis sent; that is my opinion. I don't want to be dragged into this thing; that my record was clear and what I did should be from the open bench.' Judge Clark then wanted a protest he had filed with the clerk spread upon the minutes and in the records of the court. Judge Fur ches said that the court could nnt allow that; he had his dissent in the reports and there was nothing be fore the court." Continuing, the witness said that he said to Judge Clark: "Judge Clark, the time has come when I am bound to speak out. You have filed opinions that are so filled with appeals to the peoDle and litical learning that it Is time this sort of thing was stopped. I can never consent to your filing that opinion now. There Is now nothing before the court. You have been at the bottom of all this trouble. These newspaper attacks have come from you and I know it." Q. "What was done with the protest?" "He asked to have the copies re turned. I gave mine to him on the spot and told him to 'take It, and Judge Faircloth handed him his, I think. ' "i want to add that there v never a 11110 aiicrea in that paper that I was aware of." The witness then answered some questions as to his filling the dissen- ting opinions alluded to In som ii . . . ' nravlniia tAof fmnn-ir I never Intendid to decide the rar vv ri it. fx T- ' - - WUVIUIVU V . Mil 1 I I IV c kjl mo wni, except and onlv when the case came properly before whole arlnarv and . SZWTtnrSAXB-kWATLn. Writs to hha or can at hi, otnTfjLP,OTBa lnTXrt4bl m Ua resmtT aympton blanks, and for free eownSjr vii n Rver. tzU Morrlto"n. T-, writ. -It oldeati daoxbtr Malta daIUyr4currd of dafu by rruna. When she lgfea toti rtnutawehadto go spelo to br and talk very loud to make br bear. Alter taking one-half d o n bottleeof Tercn a she can bear you In any r of lh room. She can ber an oramry cw Ttrsatlon." Thousands of people have ca tarrh who would be surprised to know It, because It has been called some other name than catarrh. Tbe fact Is, catarrh Is catarrh wherever located; and another fact which Is of equally great Im portance, tbat Peruna cures cm tarrh wherever located. Catarrh Is an American disease. Fully one-halt ot the people are afflicted more or less with It In some form. Previous to the dis covery of Peruna, catarrh was considered well nigh Incurable. Since tbe Introduction of Peruna to tbe medical profession thou sands of cases are cured annually. Mr. W.M.Holland, of Hartwell, ;, proprietor of the Hartwell Tin Works, writes of Peruna as follows : 'I am more than pleaded with tlrf benefits drlred from I'cruca. 'J 1 win ter of 1 my weight wu liO pou n .1 I ued several bottles during tbe viuu and now weigh til. "I hare recommended it to all nr friends both as a tonic and catarrh u -If I had been lucky enough to have m-c it aereral years apo rerujould Lav saved me much lnoonvet ne. I --. never be too thankfal U you for t ' benefits received from your valu: remedy. My mother has also bee n v. i derfully benefited by your valuui.i remedy." Address The Peruna Medicine Co. Columbus, O., for free oatarrb book. the court. Then and in that cae I t-hould have written an opinion to the effect that my dLenting opinion would forever fqieak my views on this question; but that the Supreme Court of North Carolina i tbe final arbiter to ss ujon question of ('in flict between the lgislature and the Contitution; that three of the five members of that court had de- cided one way, and that that wa final. I could not do lex." This cloned the direct examination of Judge Montgomery. t..o,L. wu... i.. .1. ,..i.,. ,v n . ,, i. . , ' . II, Allen, Mr. J. 1. feilnliour, Judge W. A. Graham and other managers were examined on the witness Maud. Judge Clark admit - - tea that lie advised Treasurer Worth not to oley the mandamus of the court and that he said there would be three vacant scats on tbe Supreme Court if writ was issued. After the conclusion of the testl- mony juajor w. A. uutnne oicned tne argument lor tho prosecution, speaking about 'four hours. Major Guthrie was followed by Captain Charles M. rVmL- l.n t..t. th.l opening argument for the Judgs. CAPTAIN COOK'S AIILE AJUiUMKXT. We make the following extracts from Capt. Cook's xjc1i: I will first pay my respects to a icw ji un, iBumriai.ii; projosiuons corporal ion commUhtun tax ca of tho distinguished gentleman who "long with tho doctrine of Huk v has just preceded me. Menders n. and saved to th tr a If there is one book in this ca.e I ufV of the State tbe tax. h on forty thought the managers would have mt,llon dollar of property Ignored It is the Word of God. The tbat 't"D ecaPoff taxation. spirit of this book is against this l JT tour . h"d- '"'I1 nrneixxiino- "f .i. r-..iK-, . 8n d Learn' d, Jut and Incorrupt! SSatof; ifi J M?.n" bIe jDd,ro9 render tte.r fortunate in the selection from the d.clsion In defiao.e of all tho pow Holy Book which he quoted. It is trful Influencn that alwajn ur- rather the killing of the high priest round IcglHlatures ard -ometiiu. s than the touching of the ark. Is- gts near tbe court." Now bn rael did not know her desolation un- tner PPly theae Identical doctrine til she turned her back on herjudg- ,n acS9e ,n,it happens as a rult es. I deiy the managers to cite one J kfeP Demociat out of office and sentence from the Holy Book en- fJ !?h .tP J1 inJ al! WM lm dorsing their action. Pearling ExreuJt of Scriptures to accomplish an unholy BecreUry of SfaleC. M. Cook.-. purpose! Israel never saw degrfda- Would you Impeach these judgit tion until she dishonored one of her for tn,s act lf thfey re Democrat judges. c Jadges? Kx-Govertor Thoma The chairman of the managers J Jarv,i was disposed to refer to his address Senators, yoa would not think of to Influences at work among Sena- Impeaching me ir I were on the tors. I shake hands with him andk'nca nd hal done Jat whit say let this case be tried according !hefe JDgo had doner F. I. Os lo the law. All we ask is a fair tri- b,rD Ex Attorney General, al. I know when I look In your The pros cation I mlther la faces you are human beings like I ful nor 'xpd ent, H.-natoni. Bat lf am. In political trials there are al- J' w"re Plent, I call to mind ways Influences at work, and I ask wrds of Ar stUdes who on one you If any influence, has been at cc8,' ld : "This measure may r ( a. .. I work to lay It aside . TW i,.. - v &Maci - a j. z . " v v m aa m a iiiii ...v u.s, lujcBciiuieDi irui i ever I figured hi. and Gori mr. , e. tut wti may be the last. it One of the manatrers in thir.J invoked the spirit of the ImmnrZ Vance in his speech in favor of the resolution of fmtLi" L!!I?r f?! - 'VW.UUJCUI got to do With this trial? TKa rn . I rom uuncombe said Vance had refused a $5,000 fee from Gov- emor Holden. He knew that he could not establish this. I emrihat- icaUy deny it. As a lawver v.n , wnnlrl t. 1 .,., I " vi UUL 11A WV- MIMMI V T CkWr k mlt,ed citiren not to have a fair A J . 1 V(a 11 inis e true ind he put ontinued cn Third Page) neKtected. almost torartaato a n or sertTSS I'lic&Uons. irequenUjr eanslnj uremia poisoning resulting la death. Strto- amJilLZZ2J-ZZ the has the spirit of the Immortal VhStdWa Z .1" lr. Hathaway years ago Jlscarded these oid-t.m. v perfected a system by which hriffv barb ZZm the thickened waL of ttoJ2S 1 rtrictare There -no operation. The UwSiEfJP. J ?0naX eoa Wnet: ItUtmiitS. Patient h pennant and aQ ep sI core OoosawiemoTOd. TWs method fT!- diseased oond tore ta exdualrely used tL' eore of Strto- u-Bonn, Broad 8tr rUlCIRT PAUCRAPMS FKCu FEACVIfTS.UCrES. .Mof IUI4IVM4UM rrts TM nTuHon l j- ! 1 J U U fnni thr lti-t.t & Oiui IIuiHtnN Mr. .r. u tl.c autt or oft Ir- r' llrr llti? Iri'tn the jb nal lnuit f bl r. - I ray tt at it In iU .( ran a:J itst Jiur ral . r.t tinixl in ytur art I 1. i l ii tit Is that t ) 1ichj11 ! I id scl .iil, i t l i l bVf Ui.f, but fr wl nay iK-nalltr !.- F. If. i: ''n W tiavr tad rnouh rvv in North Camilla. Tl- j have I veil iiuirJ -aet, a.l xvt u t fuinil ur fii Would to fital tbat 4tm Mr. . mould tie up in Nith fr Iit np hi lnm-r and ln- ril tbef uonl, therebs Iwn i i-viliit it'll." rVna1tr ubn man n, ine 1 rliall take in under hi liuer If no other Nor'h Carolina tbllouw in-. -i i Stetary of Mate C. M. CWkt-. The proMcutlon aays that t!.., Jodgt s bad notion tbat the a i r prlatlon for the payment of Wi lt, bad Nn withdrawn ; tbat on th 14th day of June I'AV, the ture ratified a resolution cf Inqu ry aa to whether the Treasurer h'. paid any momy to Tboph..; , bite and If any money had Im. c paid, up n what authority It u paid. If )OU meant to aay tbat to money ebould be paid to Tboj ho its bite why did joa not fay tint none eb old be paid? Thirty yean ago when I waa In Ibe Ia gllatur a demand was made upon tr, Tnaturer and waa retstd. and Lrglsla'ute then upon d eland in no uncertain word, aa 1 will ral to jou, tbat the Treasurer should pay no money to that man on tbat claim. Why waa not tbe Igll ture cf 1SW as frank In Its puri aa tbe Legislature waa thirty year ago? 1 find another thlcg, Senators -and when I ronttm plate It I mt we have gone far enough ; It l time 'OPtop that on the very day on hlch thla n nolullon was ratified atother bill waa ratified rialr.i( $3,715 to C. C. Allen and other, th shell fishery commletlnners whom the legislature of l$'.fJ attempts to put into Whfte'a place 13 71. -f tbe money which nlte bad rel it cted and paid Into the Treasury was paid to thete m n who uev r peiforned one hour service forth- State t f North Carolina Whitedi.l h" k am ou ' ou r u fJ, h,m J knl to -VO'i that he wa doin, the work I It wart krown to yon that ti e- loth ra w, i n.t doini? the work It was n old maxim of Vance'n that j the hrrse tbat pulls the plow Is n 1 tit ! to th fdd-r. Yuu glv H I t . . a . m . I omn r to ii.oiom mat iui i,.t . Ull i lie plow. You w .!! tie p e' money un man who did n j r vice, and ou are now trying to Imptach Ju gcH who nndend a J:gmnt I" fvor of the man wb. nTved the Slate. It Id time v 1 should stop Kx-fJovernor Jievu. SnatorF, when theee earn Ju ig applied the doctrine of Hoko v. ot-uuersun ior me m urn, in rentyearHin thocKof Wood . Bellamy, and the result waj to put Populists out and install Ifcn-. crats In office, we all praU d tie in as learned, pure, nonpartlrtan Jul is. Again when they app ied th doctrine or in fan materia In tt.. I "Poieni, oh Athenians, but It rmn nnvA bw. - ja m a aLiairiiin 1 --x.-wM. i.l Mr. President and AmiiA n hi .i. i jw heard the venerable Chief Justice 7Lnen ne WK UP the stand aak-d or DulUIcai" 7 hraDy par,U" blm In S1h??,ItC;. CT"r SWaywl nPK b, opinion. In I the ouestlon aak.,1 h. ' ok. w ' uc a wnai proportion of raivs Demo- CraU Lad h,ta stained In office f n.rt Pab,,cD od PoputlflU re- 1 ? ad I)emocr,l'H kept cut, ?du b"a'.d h,8.ansr- Heaald, "O KnowjtdlTe unon this B - r . . uuui riijues;ea Dy my counsel to 1 k it Up Unce these proceedings Ugan. I have looked itnpand I find and ay here to thi ? 0f yj "fflc folding cases which have come before this ?ari ?2. llmes thes lodges have decided in favor of Democrats and onl seventeen c.es against them."-Hon. a F Long. a iipbi inn n n w a mm . -..,. a TVnYIK)ESST HE AS8WEU f The following appeared In our is sue of Feb. 21&t, and it has not been answered up to thla time: ''We asked the editor of the News and Observtr last week to tell the people of North Carolina, as a mat ter of news, how much he and his had received at the hands of the Republican party. We have waited one whole week and he still hasn't answered. We again ask him the qneation,aBd hope this tlm he will not disappoint oe ; we al-o hope the editor of the News and Obser ver will not think we are Imrrtl. ex. r - j neat in tikinj the question."
The Caucasian (Clinton, N.C.)
Standardized title groups preceding, succeeding, and alternate titles together.
March 28, 1901, edition 1
2
Click "Submit" to request a review of this page. NCDHC staff will check .
0 / 75