THE CHARLOTTE NEWS, DECEMBER 27, 1914
11
fill Germany And
Russia Form Alliance?
uch Is
rk. Dec. -o. International tion, the pact will join the "scraps of
'ale? in New York have Paper" which litter Europe.
K.ni,.j ntn H is known that both Russia and
1 "nl fi VnrUn V, Z FrSnCe haVe alread' bee restiVe UQ'
''!' renoT tha" L'otia"- der the faiIure of EnSIand to aid in
1 f ,ot for an adfustment 'protecting Belgium from Germany by
' 'M , n Ruilf and Ger-rushins lare masses of troPs across
,,; ,01 Kubsia s itnarawai toward the -Allies as evidenced by her
. "brins the two nations to 1 VeCTUiUSg fher Ja?U-re l u
.;;, viu are being mafle German fleet, which m the Baltic
Ve of the most powerful in- lsf -a constant m?nace o Russia, and
"be world, a medium friend- th masons might readily be given
,! , ' t for Russia s withdrawal from the war.
f- is definitely known that
. . , ,.., .nH , ir, c,i,
rfc v:
"orm u
ion
..,,irU-r'
Whave caught the atten-
' ' nations
ation given the preliminary
indicates that there may
.:v.orse from Europe a new
. s ialiering all predictions '
, outcome of the present war ,
on the maps of Europe J
" vtrica new boundaries and i
:-.nd
T''-
. unthought of when the i"V" " T " y U1" LCU ""'' wi" "?v
i'Unsuess of Russia to con-;
eaco tiact with Germany is i
ihe failure of the Austrian ';
i e lpren?lnttrv1io found thernselves united
' Pv-Im fishing Germany, will be suddenly
j
mobilization. With Servia's
o: ibilitv to protect her own
Russia real interest in the j
cMeflv tS aid the world for the seizure of the connecting rail
i: o"GreL MHi a the fear that Russia,
'": which Russia has had an i at psace lth Germany, will again
a - - husla nas naa an move to secure warm ports in the Pa-
version.
i cxsct terms on which the nego
.hp being conducted are not
-.Civvr.. ; :t it is understood that the
Zlr ir-rusite of Russia is the unfet-
; of the Black Sea and the
PrW in peace or in war. It is
;crt-: eapd that the Czar will face
T j rcr : ct" Great Britain and France
v : exacting a huge quid pro quo
4;; ft-rrziiany, and the warm water
The lower Black Sea, which
E::.;a ras desired for years, will be
ar ' tl'.e price of peace.
Hft- lack of warm water ports has
a:3 peu regarded by Russia as
'.::ef reason for her failure to be
,c;: as important on the seas as Eng
ani. .acking a more direct outlet
;i:-:c::t for them' on the Pacific
n::: Japan drove her from Port Ar
?':e is now double-tracking the
Traa; Si' erian Railway, and later the
i:;erio'a of her acquisition of 'ports
.jn Pacific is expected to be re-
)Ian.vhiie. there awaits on the
Back Sea a haven for Russia's Navy
ai unsold commercial opportunity if
:;.e freedom of the Black Sea and
the Dardanelles can be secured. The
cerroleura and minerals of the Cau
tasus. the cereals of the steppes and
he crowing manufacturing activities
o: R-sia all would have an outlet.
Iniev such conditions Batum on the
lower Black Sea, would probably soon
ci'-nin Odessa and other Russian
tcrts less favorably located-
Thar Germany is now in a position
to ia-rr.re Russia's plans for extension
on
Black Sea is believed by those
i.ave followed developments m
Ttt:
'ar. Ir has been
demonstrated :
:dr Germany
practically governs
a .;ey. Gen. von der Goitz, recently ,
ahary Governor of Belgium, and j
ro trained the Turkish armies from t
to ls5. is now in Turkey on
i in. ' i rant mission. He is by offi
:ai .'p; 'ointment a Turkish pasha,
d i a: this moment the Turkish
-: y of War.
in;p th; outbreak of war between
una the Allies, Egypt, nomi
il'.y .i-der the sovereignty of Tur-
lias Veen taken over as a posses
.' ot Great Britain. This carries
i- the Suez Canal, which, under
'Ki:t- of the original agreement,
1 ;! i huve reverted to Turkey in
.derstood that the return or
he Suez Canal to the com-
ros.-v-ssion of Turkey is the re-
ru whira is being held out to the
sovernment for acquiescence
'' H-.ss.Vs. designs on the Black Sea.
'' : warded as certain that if the
: ions now under way are con-.
'te-o'i it' tie difficulty will be met with
;n. ;ri!-jr Turkey's consent to any
n:;:; Cerrasny may demand. German
rr! .e;:, with Turkey which rose tri
: win over that of England
.:a"fj''.?; the decisive diplomacy of
's'schai von Biberstein, is now such
; at Germany's lead will be blindly fol-
!' t- ! ointed out in connection with
! lc "recent situation that Russia has
t- opposed Germany"s commercial
illfbisf rial aoHvitioc in TnrlfftV . in-
'-nu fir plan to extend her rail-;
and commerce to the Persian
Great Britain, on the contrary.
"as i.nvavs hitterlv nrntested asainst
j c
' -.lioiuii Ul VJCl tXICLLI lUllUllvv
an explanation of Russia's pas
siveness it is hinted that long before
present war broke out German
fad Rup-ian diplomats had discussed
sn agreement practically along the
I'es of the negotiations now pend-
The seizure of Egypt by Great
cruam has given Germany the final
. erase needed to brin
i'r-te infn fVio Iot.
.Turkey com-
Tke iniportance of the pending ne
?oua!ions on the future of Europe can
not Hp minimized. It has become
latent, since the war opened that Ger
many g real objective in the war is
wear Britain. There has been no
petial QTiarrel or grievance against
J large extent a friendly tone to
av'i Doth these nations has been
aiatained by both the press and oflft--lais
of Germany, against England the
j . 01 enmity have been increased
'-';'e'Ty means in Germany's power.
j,1' pact between Great Britain,
va and France entered upon
portly after the opening of the war
nl under which it is agreed that the
e nations shall act jointly in mak-
eaCe flnH nnt cunnratuiT is Tirvt
Terra A ' ji-cxi w-ij , j .w-
-eai-dea as an obstacle to the negotia
'oii.s between Germany and Russia.
u is pointed out that this is an
eeit founded upon self interest,
JJJ. tnat if it is found by any of the
ati.jna concerned that its self interest
s more stronaly in another direc-'of
ihe Retort,
In the event that this happens, Ger
many will bend all of her oower to
the disruption of England
France
.wi18168" as m?re or less
negligible quantity, and with augment
tJ'JX?6 S$W ea8tef
der; nd Wlth tne fighting popula-
" v. . u
quality Germany will continue the
"l . , &Ti T UU.BU uas
hadmv fro the beginning.
Tn withdrawal of Russia from the
an luiyunaui eiLtJcu upon tne situation
in the Orient, and indirectly affect
the United States. The growing cor-
JJi? ?w Ja?an and . Rsia,
shattered -
Dtiau me
Li! SffU.f
cific as a connecting link with the
commerce'which she plans to build up
through the Baltic Sea.
Bryan Just Escapes
Violating the Law of
The Old Dominion
Washington, Dec. 26. Secretary of
State-Bryon locked his peace treaties
in his desk Christmas morning, took
down his shotgun, and declared war
on rabbits. He hunted manv miles
through snow in the Virginia hills and
then came back without a single cot
tontail. He had not even seen a rabbit's
track. .
He was horrified to learn on his
return to Washington that his ill luck
as a hunter was all that prevented
his being a law breaker. He didn't
know there was a law in Virginia for
bidding rabbit hunting while there is
snow on the ground.
"I am glad to say that I returned
guiltless of any rabbit's blood," said
Bryan; "but I enjoyed it just as much
as if we had caught something.'
New Jeweler at Roark's.
Mr. R. E. Ford, formerly of Cumber
land, Md., has been engaged by B.
F. Roark, the jeweler, as watchmaker
and engraver. Mr. Ford has teen a
resident of Charlotte before, having
been with the Little-Long Co., as well
as Roark-.
ADVERTISEMENT
To The Charlotte News. ;
I am of the opinion that King David
was fighting something likecigarettes.
coca cola or tainted money when he
wrote the thirty-eighth Psalm," for in
the nineteenth verse he exclaims:
"Mine enemies are lively!"
"Mine enemies" are not so very num
erous for most everybody seems to' be
with me, but those that are against
me are certainly "lively." I have had
scarcely a dull moment since shortly
after my now famous discourse on
tainted money" was first published.
By the way, it is interesting to note
how often the battle line has shifted
since the "war" first began. As every
one knows, my primary purpose was
not to go particularly after coca-cola
or cigarettes either, but assuming or
arguing that both of these were perni
cious, my primary purpose was to get
rafter the Methodist church for accept
ing the proceeds of the sale of articles
whose use was harmful, and thus well
nigh destroying the ability of the
Church to combat successfully these
growing evils. This primary purpose
has in a large measure been los sight
of, somewhat to my regret, but I pro-
nns lntpr nrt in thi nrtiHp nr "'war
rep0rt," or whatever you may term it,
ito Come back to a discussion of my
original proposition and to disclose
, i. 1 t
juiiicw licit iiiui c jjitaiiv Liie uuiuuoc a
have in mind in all this. '
.T . An Explanation.
To those a'my friends who might
be disposed to criticise me for what
seems, to be- the unreasonable length
of this communication,-1 beg to -remind
them that I am replying to num
erous attacks, from several different
sources! I am trying to make one "bom
bardment'r,answer all of these attacks
and, therefore, it is necessarily long.
However, gentle reader, I flatter my
self by saying that if you will begin
reading this article, I believe you will
read it to the end, notwithstanding its
length. It gets hotter and hotter un
til down towards the end you will al
most be able to smell something burn
ing! Go on, and see.
While you are reading, don't forget
my four Forts: My Anti-Cigarette
Fort; my Anti-Coca-Cola Fort;
my Anti-Tainted-Money Fort; and my
Freedom-of-the-Press Fort. I am com
pelled to fire from all of them today.
A good many guns have been fired
on me since my last report, and I
think the tmblic is entitled to a fur-
ther. report of the progress of the
war.
I shall find it necessary to mix my
metaphor and violate all rules of
rhetoric; but then war, like poetry,
knows no rhetoric. So here goes.
Fort Guthrie.
I am glad to report that the guns
Fort Guthrie have ceased firing.
PETROGHAD SAYS
R 1 1 HT II I ft 1 1 fl B H H n I I n 1 1
ill H Hllim L a MnlLnl
nuui inn. a univii mum
HAS COLLAPSEI
Petrograd, via London, Dec. 26
The war expert of the Novoe Vremya,
in a summary of the war published to
day refers to what he calls the "col
lapse of the Austrian campaign in
Galicia; the lack of cohesion on the
part of the German armies to the north
of Cracow, and the dogged perserver
ance, but with waning spirit of the
Germans at Sochaczew," which he says
describes the situation inxPoaad.
Going into details this observer
says:
"The lack of the success of the Aus
trian army on the Sanok-Lisko front
devitalized all thetAustrian operations
in Galicia. The fate of Przemysl
has been a weighty factor with the
Austrian general staff, which placed
great importance on the co-operation
of the garrison of this fortress with
the army advancing through the Pez
laboretz pass. The unsuccessful sor
ties of the garrison of the fortress and
the failure to effect a junction with the
field army caused the collapse of the
entire Austrian plan. The Przemysl
sorties were the last feverish efforts
of the garrison's expiring energy.
"Following the failure of the Aus
trian army on the Sanok-Lisko line.
the writer in the Novoe Vremya, goes .
on, "their "entire campaign weakened
so that our counter attacks became
more and more effective. Finally the
Russian armies took the offensive
along the entire front. The Austrians
lost all interest in their third Galician
campaign when they failed to relieve
Przemysl."
ZEPPELIN DROPS
I BOMBS Oil
CITY OF NANCY
Paris, Dec. 26, 3:55 p. m. A des
patch received here from Nancy says
that a Zeppelin airship flew over that
city early this morning and dropped
a total of fourteen bombs.
Two persons were killed and two
others wounded.
Several houses in Nancy were
slightly damaged, but none of the
public buildings was injured.
This is the first report of any hos
tile activity by a Zeppelin airship
against a French city. The last nota
ble exploit of a Zeppelin was over
Antwerp when such a ship flew over
that Belgian seaport in the early weeks
of the war and threw down bombs.
. Nancy has a population of about
100,000. It is due east from Paris,
and about ten miles from the German
frontier.
The Berlin official announcement of
today said that German airmen had
thrown medium sized bombs into the
outskirts of Nancy In retaliation for
the throwing of . bombs by a French
airman into an unnamed German vil
lage. "
This denouement came most unexpect
edly one night this week. While I was
watching Fort Guthrie I saw, very
much to my gratification, that a shell
was being fired from this source in de
fense of my Freedom-of-the-Press Fort,
and this was followed by another shell
from the same source which rose high
and, burst in the Heavens and there ap
peared in great fireworks letters, the
words: "Love to everybody! Good
night!" I then saw the commander
of Fort Guthrie withdrawing for good
from his fort. After such a brilliant
exit from the field of battle, I hated
to call him back, but was compelled to
do sc.-1 have requested him to remain
in the fight long enough to get for pub
lication the letters that passed be
tween the Coca-Cola Company and the
Charlotte Observer relating to the act
of the Coca-Cola Company in with
drawing its advertising patronage from
the Observer on account of my ser
mon on "tainted money." After that is
done, we are going to excuse Reverend-Captain
Guthrie for good and all.
Fort Everything.
This Fort has been exceedingly ac
tive. The Commander has not only
been firing broadside after broadside
through the columns of his own pa
per, but has "butted in" to the Char
lotte News and published his attack
on me there at so much "per quod era."
I regret to say that Col. Fairbrother
has allowed some vitriol and mudto
get mixed in with his ammunition. - I
do not know him very well, but I am
informed that he is a courageous and
high-toned solider, and this being true,
he must have allowed these ingredients
to get in by oversight. My experts tell
me, however, that no ammunition fired
at us which contains either vitriol or
mud does any of my Forts any harm.
My own guns are not yet equipped
with a mud-slinging attachment, but
perhaps this may be added at the arse
nal.
Col. Fairbrother convinced himself
that cigarettes were harmful and he,
therefore, declined any advertisement
of cigarettes, which was very credita
ble to him. He examined into coca
cola and became convinced that it was
harmless and accepted the advertise
ment, and surely no fair minded per
son could complain of him in this re
spect, except as to the fulness of his
Investigation. The point of complaint,
however, is that he should become so
enamored of coca-cola as not to be
able to discuss the question without
casting aspersions upon men who are
surely entitled to as much respect as
he claims for himself. Any person who
will take occasion to read his at
tack on me will see the pertinency of
these remarks.
I "coould but feel my head swelling
Just a little when I discovered that
Col. Fairbrother was getting after the
editors of the state for following me
in the matter of the freedom of the
press. My position, which I believe is
the same as that of all the editors -who
j have spoken, except Col. Fairbrother,
is that a newspaper should not become
a, sla7,e of its counting room; that it
A commit itself t0 any ad
vertiser that it would feel compelled
in protection of him to exclude from
its columns any criticism of the adver
tiser's business. As I have stated be
fore, the provision in the Constitution
as to the freedom of the press, was in
tended to protect it from the foes
without, but if the counting room is to
be the dominant factor in running a
newspaper, then we need some consti
tutional amendment to enforce the
freedom of the press against the foes
within.
A Ridiculous Canard.
But as a last resort Col. Fairbroth
er and some others who are attacking
me say that I was au "anonymous
scribbler" because my sermons were
not signed with my name. In the light
of the facts this is the most ridicu
lous charge of all. When I handed in
my first sermon to the Observer I told
the editor that I was signing a pen
name not for the purpose of conceal
ing my identity, but to make my pro
ductions impersonal and I told ! him
to tell who I was to any one wishing
to, know. The jjay I handed in my
Tainted Money sermon I distinctly sug
gested to the editor that he make an
editorial reference to the article and
tell that I was the author, because
as to that particular sermon I wished
it known that I was the author, but the
editor did not see proper to follow this
suggestion. The next day after it
was printed in the Charlotte Observer
I sent copies of it to the News and Ob
server and the Statesville Landmark,
requesting the editors to publish it and
requesting them to state that I was
the author of it, both of them com
plied with both of these requests. Be
sides that two (2) weeks before my
Tainted Money sermon appeared in
print I stated to a crowded church on
Tryon street that I ( was the sinner.
But apart from all this the 'thing that
makes the charge grotesquely absurd
is that the article which was rejected
was not an anonymous article, but
was signed as follows: "Charles W. Til
lett; Alias, Carolus; Alias, The Sin
ner." I do not know what other ridicu
lous charges are being brought against
me in various parts of the state, but I
hope this explanation will dispose of
the canard above mentioned.
Fort Candler.
There is an ominous silence at this
Fort. I would like it much better if I
could hear the "barking" of the guns
of Fort Candler. It may be that instead
of sending the steam roller which the
Superior Court Judge "warned me
against, they may be fitting up a Zep
pelin and suddenly this monster of the
air may appear above me and drop
bombs upon me sufficient to destroy '
all of my Forts. Or, it may be that
Fort Candler is preparing to send out
its best submarine, U-ll, for the pur
uose of torpedoeing Commodore John
eon's" battleship. I shall have to send
a warning at once to Commodore
Johnson to protect my Navy against
such a disaster.
Mount Duko.
Nothing doing. The Commander of
this, Fort is a veteran of many such
wars as this. I have about come to the
conclusion that he thinks "discretion
is the better part of valor," and I
really do not believe we are going
to have any shots fired on us from
this direction at least none such as
anybody can see.
Fort Charlotte News.
This, Fort, after having remained
quiescent for two weeks, has opened
up and fired on me from four stand
points, viz., the News and Observer,
the Statesville Landmark, the Greens
boro News, and the editorial columns
of the Charlotte News. The headlines
in the News and Observer above Col.
Dowd's attack, read, "W. C. Dowd goes
after C. W. Tillet."
Col. Dowd's complaint is the one
which become somewhat hackneyed,
viz., that I am violating the rules of
equitable warfare. He charges that I
am wrongfully putting him before the
people of North Carolina as an editor
who was unwilling to open his columns
to me for the purpose of discussing
the moral questions which underly
this controversy.
Dropping for a while the allegory,
let me say that Mr. Dowd will not
deny that he published my communi
cation very reluctantly, even as an
advertisement, and he will not deny
that in his editorial "reply" to my "ad
vertisement" he defended both cigar
ettes and coca-cola. He certainly does
not mean to make the impression that
he was willing to publish my. reply to
Mr. Guthrie free of charge as a -com-municaton,
because that would put me
in the attitude of being forty-nine
times an ass in insisting on .paying
him forty-nine "plunks" for that which
I could have had published free of
charge.
Mr. Dowd contends that he has al
ways 1 stood for righteousness on all
public questions. I do not care to
deny that proposition further than to
say, that on these particular publio
questions he has stood for cigarettes
and coca-cola. Col Fairbrother has
attacked cigarettes; Rev. Mr. Guthie
has defended the freedom of the
press; Dut Mr. jjowa aione oi au
who are opposing me, has not said a
solitary word in defense of any of -my
positions. If he is willling to come out
and help me on any one of these great
questions, then I beg him to
Fire one clear shot,
- From out a clear sky,
That goes to the spot,
"And hits the bull's eye!
(Poetry original).
Fort Clerico.
Fort Clerico is a new fort that is
attacking me, Reverend Captain C. S.
Kirkpatrick, of Mooresville, N. C,
commander. He is firing through tne
columns of my noblest allyr the
Statesville Landmark, - a paper that
very properly prints everything pro
and con without charge. The griev
ance of Reverend-Captain Kirkpatrick
is, that I have insisted that the Meth
odist church does not go after the
cigarette business as it should. He
seems to think he has completely de
stroyed my position - when he . has
quoted at great length the somewhat
intermittent resolutions passed at the
various sessions of the Methodist
Conference condemning cigarettes, l
have no doubt that brother Kirkpat
rick (I shall not give him a mili
tary title any longer) is a fine young
man, but when he has attained the
experience which "the sinner" has,
arising out of a long and varied
career, then brother Kirkpatrick will
find out that the most usual way to
put a question to sleep is to give it
"dope" (not coca-cola) by passing
resolutions and stopping there. These
are generally like the resolutions ot
respect for the dead; they are the
last thing done. What I want to see
the Methodist preachers do is go after
the cigarette business and the manu
facturers of cigarettes like our own
"Bob" Glenn goes after the whiskey
business and the manufacturers ot
whiskey. Suppose, brother Kirkpatrick
should go after cigarettes and - the
manufacturers of cigarettes and tell
these manufacturers of cigarettes
that they were engaged in a . perni
cious and damning business; and sup:
pose, while he was going after the
cigarette manufacturers in" this way
be should have Mn Duke in his audi?
ence and Mr. Duke should arise and
ask him how he - could ' have the
"cheek" to talk that way when the
Metuodist church was enjoying the
profits of the sale of cigarettes and
when the church had pronounced Mr.
Duke as perhaps the greatest bene
factor and -philanthropist that the
South has ever known; what Teply
would brother Kirkpatrick make to
such a question from Mr. Duke?
General Conference on Tobacco.
But brotner Kirkpatrick in order
to show how vigorously the Methodist
church is . going after " tobacco, has
seen fit to refer to the action of the
last general conference upon this
question. Well, according to this sin
ner's view, that was about the fun
niest performance that any great
Church Council ever "pulled off." It
is worthy to go down as the great
comedy of Ecclesiastical history.
This great Legislature of tne Church
solemnly enacted a law in words as
follows: -
"Section 148. The Committee on ad-1
mission shall require all applicants!
for admission on trial to agree to ab-,
stain from the use of tobacco."
Now comes the funny part. At least
thVee of the Bishops smoke like tar
kilns, and Heaven knows how many
other high dignitaries of the church.
Some of these smokers are my inti
mate and close personal friends, but
this does not keep me from seeing
the humor of the situation. The fact
that the enactment above quoted says
nothing about those who are already
addicted to the use of tobacco, im
plicitly grants to them what, in olden
times among the Roman Catholic Pon
tiffs, used to be called "indulgences."
Here stand two preachers at the an
nual Conference, both addicted to the
use of tobacco. One of them is on
the inside of the Conference and the
other one is on the outside. No church
legislation affects the man on the
inside in respect to this habit and
he can go on smoking, at least, to the
end of his days; but the poor fellow
who is on the outside may knock in
vain for admittance and they will nev
er let him in until he "swears off."
Can you imagine a funnier situation
than to have one of these ' "Holy
Fathers" who is now a smoking
BishoD taking: into the Church
preacher who is already addicted to
the use of tobacco, and refusing to
admit the aforesaid tobacco user as
a member of the Conference until he
vows total abstinence, and as soon
as the Bishop lays his hands on the
minister and pronounces the benedic
tion, he seizes a cigar and proceeds
to fill the air with tobacco fumes.
Really, brother Kirkpatrick, aren't
you sorry you alluded to that action
of the General Conference on tobacco.
.Must be Convinced Beyond Doubt.
But the funniest part of Mr. Kirk
Patrick's article is that part in which
he in effect says that he will not
attack coca-cola until we can prove
"beyond any doubt its baneful effect."
When did, the Methodist preachers
begin to talk that way aDout warn
ing people against dangers? He means
to resolve every doubt in favor ot
coca-cola. How different he is from
another Methodist preacher in this
state who, writing me warm words ot
commendation, says:
"I am so glad that you have at
tacked the coca-cola and cigarette
business so bravely. As teacher and
minister, I have been brought face to
face with those two pernicious, habit
forming stimulants and am persuaded
that they are, next to the whiskey
traffic, two of the greatest evils in
existence Stand by your
forts and many of us will rally to
your aid, for we are just awaiting
an opportunity to turn loose our
best guns upon the common enemy
of our uprising generation."
Really, - brother Kirkpatrick, . that
letter is from a man in whom no
doubt, you have the nighest confi
dence and .whose judgment you would
follow in- everything . else except his
opinion of coca-cola. How many tes
timonials like that would it take
to cinvince you "beyond a doubt" as
to the evil effects of coca-cola?
Lake Junaleska Assembly Grounds.
Here is something else for; brotn
er kirkpatrick to reflect upon.' He
does not know, perhaps, that the
Board of Directors, or Central Man
agers of that great Methodist sum
mer resort, Lake Junaleska Assem
bly Grounds, have, by common con
sent, forbidden the sale of either ci
garettes or coca-cola anywhere upon
the Assembly grounds. These Direc
tors or Managers took that action un
questionably because they thougfit
coca-cola was something more than
merely "delicious and refreshing" and
they believed that its use, like the use
of cigarettes, was pernicious. All
glory to them for this action! But in
what position does this leave our
great Church? Here we have the
Church refusing to receive any profits
from the sale of coca-cola and cigar
ettes provided the sale is made upon
the Church property, but if the sale
is made anywhere else except on the
' Church property, then the Church will
accept as a gift the. proceeds or gust
as many sales as the Candlers and
the Dukes may see fit to bestow upon
the Church; and upon the acceptance
of every such gift there will be great
thanksgiving and rejoicing ana great
pfaise of the noble, Christian benefac
tors However, a little thing like that
would doubtless be no embarrassment
to brother Kirkpatrick.
Demolishing a Windmill.
On the-other hand, instead of supporting-
me in my attack on edea
cola, Mr. Kirkpatrick joins Col. Fair
brother in trying to cast contempt
on my argument against coca-cola.
Both of these gentlemen take.-my
little joke about the glass of coca
cola that I drank some eighteen
years ago, and out of this little joke
thev make a great windmill, and tnen
these two, like Don Quixote and
Sancho Panza, as Knight-Errants
de Coca-Cola they assault the wind
mill and demolish it, and then stand
ready to proclaim that they have
"won the war" and vindicated coca
cola. ,
There is something about this coca
cola that seems to blind its advocates
so that they cannot see the force of
any arguments against it.. They seem
to ignore the statements of great ex
perts like Dr. Wiley, the great educa
tors of the country who have charge
of the young men, and the social ser
vice workers and eminent physicians.
Well, all I can say is, that if they will
not believe these testimonials against
coca-cola, then they would not believe
though one of these victims should
arise from the dead and should tell
the gruesome tale Of how this
D-O-P-E brought him to the Charnel
house through the tortuous course of
wrecked nerves.
-'Brother Kirkpatrick "protests in the
beginning ofv his article that he is not
going to " defend coca-cola, and ; yet
he" uses about one-fourth of Eis space
in doing that very thing.
Methodist Preachers Embarrassed-'
Reverend Kirkpatrick is also pro
mulgating which should not appear to
.be an old "gag", that. I am attacking
the Methodist preachers as a class. I
have asserted, and I still assert, that
Methodist preachers, one and all, feel
either estopped or greatly embarrass
ed in making any attack on cigarettes
and coca-cola, because the Church to
which they belong is "feeding" in part
on both cigarettes and coca-cola. Who
is there that would not be embarrass
ed by such a situation? If the Meth
odist preacher attacks coca-cola and
cigarettes and he does a complete job
is he not obliged also to attack, the
Church that is profiting by the very
thing that he is condemning, upon, the
ground that the Church ought not to
encourage any pernicious business by
accepting the proceeds arising from
the business.
Not Attacking Methodist Preachers.
Let me make my position clear. I
do not believe that the Methodist
preachers as a - rule are under the
dominion of the money power, and as
I have stated frequently, I will trust
the rank and file of these veterans to
do the right. They will when aroused,
push the battle line forward and "the
gates of hell shall not prevail against
them." However, as stated , above, I
think all Methodist preachers are em
barrassed by the situation in which
they are placed, because I do not .be
lieve that while many of them are
now attacking both cigarettes and
coca-cola, they all do, nevertheless,
suffer from the embarrassment of the
situation,
In this connection, I would like to
refer to a great Methodist, revival
that was held somewhere in North
Carolina not a great while ago. It
was reported that there was at this
meeting a "gracious outpouring of the
Spirit" and God forbid that I should
controvert that fact. I did not attend
the meeting, but I have information
from the most reliable sources that
at this meeting which was conducted
by two of the "high-ups" in the Church,
every form of sin and wickedness, in
eluding drinking, lasciviousnes.s,
gambling, and the like, and not omit
ting dancing, card playing and theater
going, were boldly attacked; every
thing you could think of except, cig
arettes and the 'dope' habit, I won
der if my brother Kirkpatrick will not
agree with me that these subjects
were omitted on account of the em
barrassment that the aforesaid minis
ters experienced in attacking the
Church's sources of revenue? We
could hardly reach the conclusion that
the omission to mention these was
"accidental."
I have an humble purpose to aid
in liberating these noble Methodist
preachers from the thraldom of these
untoward circumstances. My motives
have been assailed from every stand
point, out I nave a set purpose to ac -
compnsn, u possiuie, a great lasn. i
hear some derisive voice ask how I,
who am but a pigmy, expect to ac
complish a task fit only for one who
was able to perform the labors of
Hercules. It does, indeed, seem a
great undertaking for one occupying
my position, but
"Tall oaks from little acorns grow!"
Theological Demagoguery.
In praising the Methodist preachers,
please bear in mind that I do not in
tend to praise them all. I had a let
ter a few days ago from one of the
foremost young Methodist ministers of
this state, and in this letter, while
speaking of the manner in which a
certain church problem had been han
dled, this learned young Doctor of
Divinity said that the proper settle
ment of the matter had been pre
vented "through ecclesiastical dema
goguery and dictation." Right you are,
my worthy brother. I go you one bet
ter. There are more thaflfone of these
Ecclesiastical Demagogues high up;
indeed, still higher up. I go a little
further and ' say that, in my humble
judgment, no ecclesiastical body has
ever suffered quite so much from ec
clesiastical demagoguery in high
ranks as has the Southern Methodist
Church. I said something then, and
you will please watch the result. . If
you throw a stone into a flock of
chickens, the hit rooster is going td
squawk. Listen for the "squawk"! -The
Tocsin Has Been Sounded. .
All Methodist preachers who take
a bold stand upon these questions lay
themselves liable to counter, attacks
from the aforesaid theological dema
gogues who-may be over. them. That
is where a layman like myself has the
advantage of the preachers in making
this fight, because there is nothing
that these political Fathers of the
Church can do to me. But I do not
believe that I would be deterred even
if I were subject to their authority.
However, thank God there are
preachers who stand ready to "speak
out in meeting" and boldly express
their honest convictions. : Some of
them have already done so.
Yes. the tocsin has been sounded;
the alarm has been-rung! Hear what
a brave' preacher occupying the pulpit
of one of the foremost churches k in
the Western North Carolina Conference
has said within two "weeks' passed. J
find it quoted in the Statesville Land
mark of December 18th. This man of
God preaching upon the courageous
words of Saint Paul. 'Where the
Spirit of the Lord Is, there is liberty,
closed his brave sermon with these
words:
"The question before America today,
is not the question of 'tainted money,
but a question of tainted men. It. is
a question as to whether money alone
can control American manhood,
whether money can control the chan
nels of American thought and the
sources of public opinion in this
country. It is a question as to whether
we shall allow the colunms of our
newspapers to' become directly or in
directly subsidized; it is a question as
to whether the faculties of our Amer
ican colleges can be trained to hear
their Master's voice, before they, speak
to the young men in their class rooms;
it' is a question as to whether the
'source of endowments shall have any
influence in the " shade' of . opinion
taught in our theological seminaries,
or proclaimed from American pulpits." ;
Does it hot make yonr Methodist
blood tingle to read words like that?
Does it not make you hold your Meth-
a more wefied atmosphere? Many
more are talking just in that way, and
the time is coming rapidly when we i
are not going to accept either a Duke
or a Candler as the Lord High,
Almoner of the Church.
For myself,-1 want to say that I am A
against accepting these munificent
benefits from any source, whether a
Duke, a Candler of a Carnegie, if any
of them come in such way as that the
result is brought about to which the
brave preacher above quoted from re- '
f ers, viz.,' that "the source of endow-
ments shall have any influence in the
shade of opinion'taught in our theolog
ical seminaries or proclaimed from '
and out to the acceptance of any gifts
'from any sources that will in the
slightest particular embarrass us as
a' Church, in attacking any form of
wrong; I want to see our young men -come
out of our institutions of learn-
n? nrt that thev mn v stand "fnnr.
square to all the world" and not feel. ;
themselves under any obligations to
any man or class of men whOBe busi-
ti ass h narniotniis '
Not Attacking VYine of Cardtri.
But : this article is getting so hot '
that the printer -may have to use as
bestos DaDer unless I cool it down..
I, therefore, shift, over to another
subject and ask leave to, say to the
written me in reference to the fight
going on against the. Wine of.Cardui :
and the good Methodist brother who is,
manufacturing and selling it, that I
have all that I can attend to in my x
scrap with the cigarette and coca--
cola people, and in discussing tainted
money and the freedom of the press.
It seems that this Wine of Cardui has
bo mucn oi me reverend in it, tnat
- 1 J! KlL it . ml m
it is troubling the . reverends, but T
ask that you will, kindly excuse , me
from . "butting in" to the fight . on
brother Patton out in Tennessee .
Finally Brethren.
ft CfKlT finally Hl"Ck4'1-l-t'n T Am vs.
ceivlng letters from all over the state
saying, "We read ith pleasure all
you say." "Write some more." "Hit
'em again!" On the other hand, nearly
all of my critics speak of my long dis
courses which evidently are very bor-
mg to them. I have no doubt that
ii i. ; i . i . :. . i r
inese amcies nave ueen too long, Dut i
have had so mainy attacking me from
so many different standpoints that it
has been impossible to be brief. Be-1
sides that, I rather feel flattered, that
my communications are boring to the
"enemy." I am reminded of a story
which is frequently told and which
runs on this wise: Hon. F. I. Osborne,
of this city, was formerly Solicitor
prosecuting criminals in the Judicial
District which included Charlotte and
Monroe. It is doubtless true that there :
never was a, uoiuer or more.eioquenv
prosecuting, officer than he. On one
occasion in the town of Monroe, he
was trying a defendant charged with
some offense and was making before
the jury a terrific and scathing ar-
oner at the bar. While Solicitor Os- :
borne was speaking, the defendant '-
went out on the streets of Monroe and
told his friends that that fellow Os
borne was making the most boring
speech he had ever heard! I hope
"mine enemies" will see the point of
the anecdote.
CHAS. W. TILLETT.
i charlotte, N- C. Dec. 24th, 1914,
To the Public:
advertising colums of the Charlotte
$30 this time. While this article Is a
good, deal longer than the other one,
vet. it. seems that. T et rpriiipA raten
i . - o r WVWS.
on account of Its length.- Thus, I am .
glad to say a "long haul" cost me less
than a "short haul," which is very grat
ifying to a man who is as long-winded
as I .am. '
jvir. uowu lniorms me tnat ms rea-
m T- 3 s B j t ' t
sdn for declining to put this in free
as a communication is that others on
the other side of the question are try
ing to get into The News, and he. is
refusing to admit them unless they
pay. I do not know whether he is at
tacking them in the editorial columns
of his paper, but if he is, I think he
ought to let them reply to his editorial
attack without, charging them. -
You people perhaps read Mr. Dowd's
protestation that I was treating him
nnfairlv in TnVin tr 4t gntuor fhat ha
wouia not give me access to nis paper .
without requiring pay from me. I am ,
nut oyer ueic m iub au y ei using uoi
U ill 11 J.1UJLU V-UUitC, UUl II um UClBBllJ.
The only Vthing in connection with
mis waoie an: air which mr, jjowa aas
notice that I gave out to the Press of
the state that I was not going to run
for governor or any other office to
which the people could elect me. For
some reason that notice went -in The
News free. " ,
Up tor date the; benefits derived by
the Charlotte News from this con-
v ajr .axe C.E3 iuuvno.
First: An ODDortunitv for the News
to pose before the public as the great
aavocate oi qivic ngnteousness- -
i i t :
Second: An opportunity to defend
cigarettes and a retention of the ciga-
rette advertisement.-.--.
Third: An opportunity to defend
coca-cola and a retention of the coca-"
cola advertisement. ' -
Fourth: Getting from me in- all
about ninety dollars of my hard-earned
money, in consideration, of publishing
for me "two pieces" (including this
one) and' a "witty little ditty'' and let
ting me. have a few hundred copies of
the News..
j? ii ill. vjrcLiiiig uuui vui. r oil uruw-
Truest-. n.iti. ni -m: v
er about $30 for publishing his at-r
tack on me. .
Sixth:. The- criticising of :me in" its
editorial columns and forcihs me to
reply in advertising columns. , ' ,
You see I am criticised editorially,
but have to reply advertising-ly. . And
then 1 am. criticised again editorially
and have to reply again, advertising-ly.
Thus the News has made for itself one
of these endless chains, with cups od
It, which goes down intermittently into
ualiy drawing iip my "plunks" ;. and
throwing, fchem over into the great big
tin bucket which the paper has at the
The only thing I am now concerned
a?iAiif tc rv laorn tirvur lrm r f will Vko
at the present rate, before. the Char-
l.ii. . " .",11 1 IT T . . ,
lotie iNews wui nave an 1 possess vls
a result of this .newspaper, coritro-'
versy. - ' - :
CHAS. , W, TILLETT.
'Dec- 26th, 1914. , - T. .