received into the Democratic family it is only tolerated as an alien. The ten drils of the Democratic heart will not encircle it. It must work for jboard and clothing and eat at the second table. Not so in the Republican home: there it sits at the head of the table: the honored first born J There is neither stability, nor safety for this grand principle outside the Republican Par ty, A PERTINENT INQUIRY; A noted Mohammcdon philo-jpohcr, centuries ago wrote; "In the course of my long life I have observed that the men are more like the times in whicli they live than they are like the father's.!' " In 1S52 the writer then a boy well remembers going to the polls with his father full of enthusiasm for that grand old Whig' ticket of Scott and Graham.' That ticket represented Whig supremacy and a "high .protec tive tariff." , To-day we intend to vote the same principles and the same platform in the persons of Blaine and Logan. Vrherc now is the old Whig element that then J centered around the ierson of William A. Graham and a high protective tariff? Have they all sacrafied their principles and plat form and with the sons' of that- honest, pure minded Statesman joined hands with "the Bourbon Democracy? Is it possible that the old Whigs of Orange and Durham, those who pay an an nual pilgrimage to the gravp of the dead Statesman, intend now to vote for "Free Trade" and againsi a rep resentative government? We shall see. I "Protection as perpetuated under Republican rule has been helpful , to the domestic tobacco indusjry and this fact no one engaged therein irf likely to forget." Tobacco jLcaf. Exactly, "as perpetuated under Re publican rule." The Republ can par ty is friendly to protection. Democ racy is hostile thereto. Agitation by an unfriendly party is worse than re duction. Democracy cannot touch the tariff to correct its inequalities even, without deranging the business interests of the country. Capital nor Labor have confidence in an unfriend ly legislative body party can legislate ; The Republican upon the tariff for the reason that it is familiar learning everywhere that W3 believe in a tariff for Protection anil administer it in that direction. Wje think w6 are jus tified ia saying that those wio grow and handle leaf tobacco believes in a j. - . - Protective tariff as Republican rule." to pull off his coat hand.' perpetuated under Who. will be first and lend a helping THE DARBY LETTER. BOURBOM OPPOSITION TO FREE THOUGHT AND j MANLINESS SCA THINCL Y v EXPOSED. ! ' TAUT I. ' ' i "Wis 1- "IT I 'TV1..W II utijU.-, iixi . x lev Li iv xi. iyaiuj) in a communication to the Democrat ic County Executive Committee, de clares himself as opposed to the. pres entform o:rCounty Government, which we consider of the utmost importance to the is people of this city ; therefore, it "Rejsolyed, That the Clerk of this Board is 1 hereby directed to inform Mr. parfy that his resignation as City Attorney is expected and will be accep In ed by this Board." response thereto I have to say that I cannot comply with the request, embodied in the above resolijtion, for the pjainreason that 1 1 have nothing to resigni I am not holding airy office from, anyo; byj, through, or under you or her person or corporation. You did employ me, perhaps by the -year, perhaps during the term of your Board, to at :eiul to your law business. ' This I have', done, receiving therefor very inadequate consideration. In fact, you arc and have been about the poorest paying clients; in my lajvv office. Your withdrawal therefrom will give pleas ure ratlier than pain. The loss of 3'our patronage is of no conseqnencc to me. Possibly .it involves the repu diation of a contract by you, but men who conspire to rob a free North Garo linian of his liberty of opinion, cannot be expected to observe the inviolabil ity, of contracts, j Do not imagine that I would make any claim that there was a contract between us, in order to throw-any obstacle in the way of a dis solution! of oui official' connection. I am too well informed of the utter and contemptible hollowness, of the hypo critical pretensions to political purityj of some of you to ever desire a very close official connection With you Those vfho under the cover of secrecy, laruuii, njmiu inruuoj uuj uu t- tisan opposition before an election, by considerations in votes to be delivered afterwards, are not, to say the least, such official companions as one would desire to be in too close communion with,' They are, more than that, freghted with minds ill-prepared to brook the candid opinions of an out spoken iman. 1 Ybur action, as shown by the fore going resolution, is only important, because? of the i ! j PUBLIC TRUSTS which you hold and the reason which you have given ioryoui conauci. en trusted, with the power ana amy oi administering the public affairs of one of the municipalities of the State, hold ing that trust for the benefit, not of i part, but of all of its inhabitants, oc cupying a place where it should be your pleasure, as it isyour duty to be examples of public virtue, you have prostituted your trusts by an exhibi tion of petty spite and flagrant intol erance. You have by you r example sought to establish a reign of political proscription and bigotry. You seek to punish free men, because thej dare to. diiler with you. ; 1 ou would STARVK men who dp hot consent to receive their jtoUticajl opinions j from you or from those whose willing in struments you are. j You Attempt to carry politics into a mere business employment , which I justifies me in charging that 3011 seek to establish a reign 01 terror in ousine.ss ana society, under which free Americans are to le tlie nlaves of a bigoted proscriptive and insolent oligarchy.' . 1 ou seem to forget that it is agaiinst just this soit of tyranny that whjte men of North Carolina are now rising in rebellion. They are tired of being, driven and They are begin- is almost time for! bo.sseu 111 polities. ning to think that it another ! 1 EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION, this time for the benefit of the -J white! men, and they have almost d eterm i hed to issue it and execute it themselves This is the fundamental difference between the two contending political forces in Southern politics the Bourj bon anl the Liberal;-The Bourbon J true to the instinctsj and traditions of his ancestal party in France, seeks to v maintain in the South as near as may -be, j the status quo (under which the great body of the white men were simn ply the'politieal and social serfs of a -few semi-feudal lords. To this end lie seeks to shackle free thought and trample out its freej expression. The j Liberal, on the other hand,' contends ' I, for the largest 1 iberty of t hOught and. .' speech. He makes no wr on any man because of his opinions. He in sists that the Bourbon shall have his opinions and the freest expression ' of them. He would take from the latter ISo right and no privilege, except the if tti I'll nrfn nf lontrinir . tlioit fifrVifa fn others. ( He would impose upon him no j burden except ithat of respecting the rights of others. He would toler ate everything but intolerance and proscribe nothing but proscription. (TO BE CONTINUED.) Great stress is put upon : the ah- nouncement, that the payment to the State of $600,000,1 by the Western North Carolina Railroad will! relieve the tax payers of State tax, the pres ent year, but the bourbon papers fail to say that the polj tax will be collec ted as usual. The property of thcriph men who are able to pay, is exempted, but the poor man must pay on his head as usual and. if he fails, he is to1 be sent to the work-house. A bour bon Legislature so decrees it.. North State. ! : i '