CAMPAIGN
KEYHOTE
Sounded by the Democratic Lead
er in His Speech at
Indianapolis.'
PARAMOUNT ISSUE IS IMPERIALISM
Policy in the Philippines Exhaustive
ly Discussed by Bryan.
PEOPLE GOVERNED MUST OOKSENT
Or the Government Is Not on Line
Authorized by the Principle
.of the American Itepnb
j He Appal to the
Father.
Following is the apeech delivered
by Mr. Bryan at Indianapolis to the
committee which notified him of his
nominatoln for the presidency by the
Democratic convention at Kansas
City:' , 4,, . - -
Mr. Chairman and Members of the
Notification Committee
I Bhall, at an early day, and in a
more formal manner, accept the nom
ination which you tender,. and I shall
at that time discuss the various ques
tions covered by the Democratic plat
form. It inajfnot be out of place, how
ever, to submit a few observations at;
this tUne uiwn the general character
of the content before us, and upon the
question ' which is declared to -be of
paramount importance in this cam
paign. When I say that the contest of 1900
Is a contest between Democracy on
the one hand and plutocracy . pn the
.other I do not mean to say that all our
opponents have deliberately chosen to
give to organized wealth a predominat
ing iiiil! t :hh? in the affairs of the gov
ernment. 1 at I do assert that on tho
important Hniies of the day the Re
publican j'.irty is dominated by those
Influences which constantly tend toele
vate pecuniary considerations and ig
nore human rights.' In 1859 Lincoln
said that the Itennblican parry be
lieved in the man and the dollar, but
that In case of conflict it believed In
the man before the dollar. This is the
proper relation which should exist be
tween the two. Man, the handiwork of
God, comes first, money, the handi
work of man, is of inferior Importance.
Man is the master, money the servant,
but upon all impoHant questions today
IU'publlenn legislation tends to make
money the master and man the serv
ant. The maxim of Jefferson, "equal
rights to all and special privileges to
none," and the doctrine of Lincoln
that this Khould be a government "of
the people, by the people and for the
people," are being disregarded, and
the instrumentalities of government
are being used to advance the Inter
ests of those who are in. a position to
secure favors from the government
The Democratic party is not making
war upon the honest acquisition . of
wealth; it has no desire to discourage
industry, economy aud thrift. On the
contrary, it gives to every citizen the
greatest possible, stimulus to honest
toil when it promises him protection
In the enjoyment of the proceeds of
his labor. Property rights are most
secure -when human rights are respect
ed. Democracy strives for a civiliza
tion in which every member of' society
will share according to his merits.
No one has a right to expect from
society, more than a fair compensation
for the service which be renders to
Kociety. If he secures more it Is at the
expense of some one else. It is no In
justice to him to prevent his doing in
justice to another. To him who would,
either through class legislation or in
the absence of necessary legislation,
trespass upon the rights of another the
Democratic party says, "Thou shalt
not." ' - v '
Against us are arrayed a compara
tively small, but politically and finan
cially powerful.5 numberi who really'
profit by Uepublican policies, but with
them are ; associated a large number
who, because' of their attachment to
their party name, are giving their sup
IHrt to 'doctrine's antagonistic to, the
former teachings of their own party.
Republicans who used to advocate bi
metallism, now try to convince them
selves that the gold standard is good;
Republicans who were fornferly at
tached to the greenback are now seek
ing an excuse for glvhig national banks
control of the nation's paper money;
Republicans who used to boast that
the Republican party was paying off
the national debt, are now looking for
reasons to support a perpetual and In
creasing debt; Republicans who for
merely abhorred a trust, now beguile
themselves with thedeluslon that there
are good trusts and bad trusts, while
in their minds the'llne between the
two is becoming more and more ob
scure; Republicans who In times past
congratulated the country upon the
small expense of our standing army
are now making light of the objections
which are urged a gainst a large Increase
in the permanent military establish-"
ment; Republicans who gloried in our
independence when the nation was less
powerful now look with favor upon a
foreign alliance; Republicans who three
years ago who condemned "forcible an
nexation" as immoral and even crim
inal, are now sure that it Is both im
moral and criminal to oppose forcible
annexation.
POLICY IN THE PUIUPPME8.
Republicans CUarc4 with Not Metlaff
th Great 1mu Sqaarely.
For n (Tine Republican leaders were
inclined to deny to opponents the right
to criticise the Philippine policy of the
administration, but upon investigation
they found that both Lincoln and Clay
asserted and exercised the right to
criticise a president during the progress
of the Mexican war. Instead of meet
ing the issue boldly; and submitting a.
clear amfc positive plan for dealing wtih
the Philippine question, the Republic
an convention adopted a platform, the
larger part of which was devoted to
boasting and self-congraulatlon.
But they shall not be permit
ted to evade the stupendous and far-
reaching Issue which they have delib
erately brought Into the arena of pon
Peace Institute
mm
I
A I horoaf h School of high grade for
tn1. In pine belt of Nor Mi Carolina
so famous for health.
- ) a
Al bfkd
I
tics. When the president, supported j
m Trfttta1v nnnnimocs vote of the 1
bouse and senate, entered upon a r
with Spain for the purpose or aiums
the struggling patriots of Cnba, the
country, witbenit regard to party, ap
plauded. Although the Democrats rec
ognized that the administration would
necessarily gain a political advantage
from the conduct of a war which, in
th every nature of the case, must soon
end la a complete victory, they vied
jrlth the Republicans In the support
which they gave to the president.
When the war was over and the Re
publican leaders began to suggest tihe
propriety of a colonial policy opposi
tion at once manifested itself. When
the president finally laid before the
senate a treaty which recognized the
Independence of Cuba but provided for
the cession of the Philippine islands
to the United States, the menace of im
perialism became so apparent that
many preferred to reject the treat?
and risk the ills that might follow rath
er than take the chance of correcting
the errors of the treaty by the Inde
pendent action of this country.
I was among the number of those
who believed it better to ratify the
treaty and end the war, release the vol
unteers, remove the excuse for war ex
penditures, and then give to the Phil
ippines the Independence which might
be forced from Spain by a new treaty.
In view of the criticism which ray ac
tion aroused In some quarters I take
this occasion to restate the reasons
riven at that time. ,1 thought ft safer
to trust the American people to give
Independence to the Filipinos than to
trust the aecomplishpient of that pur
pose to diplomacy wth an unfriendly
nation. Lincoln embodied an argument
In thp rmpstfnn when he asked: "Can
aliens make treaties easier than friends
can make laws?" I believe that we are
now in a better position to wage a suc
cessful contest against -Imperialism
than we would have been had the
treaty been rejected. With the treaty
ratified, a clean cut issue presented
between a government by consent and
a government by force, and imperial
ists must bear the responsibility for all
that happens until the question .Is. set
tled. If the treaty had been rejected
the opponents of imperialism would
have been held responsible for any in
ternational complications which might
have arisen before the ratification of
another treaty.
But whatever difference of opinion
may have existed as to the best methr
od of opposing the colonial policy there
never was any difference as to the
jrreat importance of the question, and
there is no difference now as to the
course to be pursued. The title of
Spain being extinguished we. were at
liberty to deal with the Filipinos ac
cording to American principles. The
Bacon resolution, introduced a month
before hostilities broke out at Manila,
promised Independence to the Filipinos
on the same terms that It was promised
to the Cubans. I supported, this rescK
lutlori and believe that Its adoption
prior to the breaking out of hostilities
wbuUThave prevented bloodshed, and
that its adoption "at any subsequent
time would have ended hostilities.
...
MUST EXPECT FIX.IPIKO REVOLT.
Oar Whole History Encouragement for
Their Remittance.
If it is right for the United States
to hold the Philippine islands perma
nently and Imitate European empires
In the government of colonies the Re
publican party ought to state its po
sition and defend it, but it must expect
the subject races to protest against
such a policy and to resist to the ex
tent of their ability. The Filipinos do
not need any encouragement from.
Americans now living. Our whole his
tory has been an encouragement, not
only to the Filipinos but to all who
are denied a voice in their own gov
ernment. If the Republicans are pre
pared to censure all who have used
language calculated to make the Fili
pinos hate foreign domination let them
condemn the speech of Patrick Henry.
When he uttered that passionate ap
peal, "Give me liberty or give me
death," he expressed a sentiment which
still achoes in tfie hearts of men. Let
them censure Jefferson,
Washington, . Lincoln.
' Some one has said th::t a truth once
spoken can never be recalled.
But ; if It were possible to obliterate
every word written or spoken In de
fense of the principles set forth in the
rSechrratlon of Independence a war of
conquest would still leave Its legacy of
perpetual hatred, for it was God him
self who placed in every human heart
the love of liberty. He never made a
race of people so low In the scale of
civilization or In telligence that It would
welcome a foreign master. Lincoln said
that the safety of this nation was not
in its fleets, its armies or its forts, but
in the spirit which prizes liberty the
heritage of all men, In all lands, ev
erywhere; and he warned his country
men that they could riot destroy this
spirit without planting the seeds of
despotism at their own doors.
Those who would have this nation
enter"upon a career of empire must
consider not only the effect of Imperial
Ism on the Filipinos, bet they must
also calculate its effect upon our own
nation. We cannot repudiate the prin
ciple of self-government in the Philip
pines without weakening that prin
ciple here. Even now we"are beginning
to see the paralyzing influence cf im
perialism. Heretofore, this nation has
been prompt to express Its sympathy
with those who were fighting for civil
liberty. . Butnow when a war
Is in progress in South Africa which
must result in the extension of the
monarchlal idea or in the triumph of a
republic, the advocate of imperialism
in this country dare not say a word In
behalf of the Boers.
EXPANSION IS NOT IMPERIALISM.
Jefferson QuotoU to Show That Conanm
I la Un-American,
Our opponents, conscious of the
weakness of , their cause, seek to con
fuse imperialism with expansion, and
have even dared to claim Jefferson as
a supporter of their policy. Jefferson
spoke so freely and used language
with such precision that no one can be
lgnoraut of his views. On one occasion
he declared: "If there be one principle
more deeply rooted than any other In
the mind of every American, it is that
w should hare nothing to do with con
quest." And again he aid: Conquest
Is not In our principles; it is inconsist
ent with our government The forci
ble annexation of territory to be gov
erned by i arbitrary 'power, differs as
much from the acquisition of territory
to be built up Into states as a mon-
and iGonsevatorv,
Judge Gray of j CuJpeper, Va.,
savs: "The Verr best female schnnl
niwnicnx nave any Knowledge."
Catalogue free.
AMk. DlKVinniK.'M. A.. Prinrinsl
Cowill Goodwin, Director.
I
i
archy differs from a democracy. Th
Democratic party does not oppose ex
pansion, when expansion enlarges the
area or tne repuoiic ara incorporate
land which can be settled by American
citizens, or adds to our population peo-;
pie. wb are willing to become citi
zens and are capable of discharging
their duties as snch. The acquisition
of the Louisiana territory. Florida,
Texas, and other tracts which nave
been secured from time to time, en
larged the republic, and the constitu
tion followed the flag into the new ter
ritory. It is dot proposed to sieze up
on distant territory already more
densely populated than our own coun
try and to force upon the people a gov
ernment for whicn there Is no war
rant in our constitution or our laws.
If "we have an imperial policy we
must have a large standing army as
its natural and necessary complement.
That a large permanent in
crease in our regular army is intended
by the Republican leaders is not a
mere matter of conjecture, but a mat
ter of fact. In 1S9C the army
contained about 25,000 men. Within
two yeare the president asked for four
times that many, and a - Republican
house of representatives complied with
the request after the Spanish treaty
had been signed and no country was at
war with the United States.
A large standing army is not only a
pecuniary burden to the people and.
If accompanied by compulsory service,
a constant source of Irritation, but It
Is ever a menace to a Republican
form of government. The army is the
personification of force, and militarism
will inevitably change the ideals of the
people and turn the thoughts of our
young men from the arts of peace to
the science of war. The government
which relies for its defense upon Its
citizens, is more likely to be just tban
one which has at call a large body of
professional soldiers. A -small stand
ing army and a well equipped and
well disciplined state mllitja are suffi
cient in ordinary times, and in an
emergency the nation should In the
future as In the past place Its depend
ence upon the volunteers who come
from all occupations at their country's
call -and return to productive labor
when their services are no longer re
quiredmen who fight when the coun
try needs fighters and work when the
country needs workers.
FUTURE STATUS OF THE FII.TPINO.
What Are We to Do with Illm Now That
We Have Him?
The Republican platform assumes
that the Philippine Islands will be, re
tained under American sovereignty,
and we have a right to demand of the
Republican leaders a discussion of the
future status of the Filipino. Is he to
be a citizen or a subject? Are we to
bring into the body politic eight or ten
million Asiatics, so different from us in
race and history that amalgamation Is
Impossible? Are they to share with us
in making the laws and shaping the
destiny of this nation? No Republican
of prominence has been bold enough to
advocate such a proposition. The Mc
Enery resolution, adopted by the sen
ate immediately after the ratification
of the treaty, expressly negatives this
idea. The Democratic platform de
scribes the situation when it says that
the Filipinos cannot be citizens with
out endangering our civilization. Who
will dispute it? And what is the alter
native? If the Filipino is not to be a
citizen, shall we make bira a subject?
On that question the Democratic plat
form speaks with emphasis. It de
clares that the Filipino cannot be a
subject without endangering our form
of government. A republic can have
no subjects.
The Republican platform says that
"the largest measure of self-government
consistent with their welfare and
our duties shall be secured iQ them
(the Filipinos) by law." This Is a
strange doctrine for a government
which owes It's very existence to the
men who offered their lives as a pro
test against government without con
sent and taxation without representa
tion. In what respect does the position
of the Republican party differ from the
position taken by the English govern-
ment in 1776? Did not the English
government promise a good govern
ment to the eolonists? Did
not the English government promise
that the colonists should have the lnrgJ
est measure of self-government con
slstant with their welfare and English
duties? The Republican par
ty has accepted the European idea and
planted itself upon ground taken by
George III, and by every ruler who
distrusts the capacity of the people for
self-government or denies them a voice
in thlr own affairs.
The Republican platform promises
that some measure of self-government
is to be given to the Filipinos by law;
but, even -this pledge is not fulfilled.
Why does the Republican
party hesitate to legislate upon the
Philippine question? Because a law
would disclose the radical departure
from history ajad precedent contem
plated by those who control the Re
publican party. The storm of protest
which greeted the Porto Rican bill was
an indication of what may be expected
when the American people are brought
face to face with legislation upon this
subject:
If the Porto RIcans. who welcome
annexation, are to be deniei the guar
antee of onr constitution, what is to
be the lot of the Filipinos, who resisted
our authority? If secret Influences
could compel a disregard sf our plain
duty toward friendly people, living
near our shores, what treatment will
those fiame influences provide, for un
friendly people 7,000 miles away? If,
la this country where the people have
the right to vote, Republican leaders
dare not take the side of the people
against the great monopolies which
have grown up within the last few
years, how can they be trusted to pro
tect the Filipinos from the corpora
tions w hich are waiting to exploit the
islands? - - " -
Is the sunlight of fuH'citizenshlp to
be enjoyed by the people of the United
States, and the twilight of semi-citizenship
endured by the people of Porto
Rico, while the thick darkness of per
petual vassalage covers the Philip
ulnes? The Porto Rico tariff law as
serts, the doctrine that the op
eration of the constitution is confined
to the forty-five states. The Democratic
party disputes this doctrine and de
nounces it as repugnant to both the
letter and spirit of our organic law.
There is no place In our system of gov
ernment for the deposit of arbitrary
ana irresponst Die power. e
The territorial form of government la
O
Bean tie
Spuine
f
Ik toa Ya torn Uwsn EorgH
PROTECTlQJfL fteiwl mnf.1 VtoH Mr vXr,s
for freo examination and adrico. -
EODX till PATElITS"bear?
temporary and preparatory, and the
chief security a citizen of a "territory
has is foTind in the faet that he enjoys
the same -constitutional guarantee, and
Is subject to tbe same general laws as
a citizen of a state. m
Throw atsny this security and his
rights will be violated and- his inter
ests sacrificed at the demand of those
wlo have political Influence This Is
the evil of the colonial system, no mat
ter by what nation it la applied.
' OCB TITTO TlIE-IStAN'DS.
Were the People ThrWera I with the Orl
: aataJ Keal Estate
.What la our title to the Philippine
Islands? Do we hold them by treaty
or by conquest? Did we buy them or
did we. take them? Did we purchase
the people? If noChow did we secure
title to them? Were they thrown in
with the land? Will the Republicans
say that Inanimate earth haa value,
and when that earth Is molded by the
Divine Hand and stamped with . the
likeness of the Creator it becomes a
fixture and passes with the soil? If
governments derive their Just powers
from the consent of the governed it is
Impossible to secure title to people,
either by force or by purchase. , We
could extinguish Spam's title by treaty,
but if we hold title we must hold it
by some method consistent with our
ideas of government. When we made
allies of the Filipinos and arm'eJ them
to buy, Spain's title we are na.,inuo
cent purchasers. But even, if we had
not disputed Spain's title she could
transfer no greater title than she had,:
end her title was" based on force alone.
We cannot defend such a title, bat a
Spain gave us a qultclalm deed we
can bcnorably turn the property over
to the party in possession. Whether
any American otticial gave the Fili
pinos formal, assurance of indepen
dence' is not material. - There can be
no doubt that we accepted and utilized
the services of the Filipinos, and that
when we did so Ave had full knowledge
that they were fighting for their own
Independence, and I submit that his
tory furnishes no example of turpitude
baser than ours If we now substitute
our yoke for the Spanish yoke.
Let us consider briefly, the reasons
which have been jgiven in support of
an imperialistic policy., Some say that
it is our duty to hold the Philippine
islands. But duty Is not an argument;
it is a conclusion. To ascertain what
our duty is In any-emergency we must
apply well settled and generally ac
cepted principles. It is our duty to
avoid stealing, no matter whether the
thing to be stolen is of groat or little
value. Every one recognizes the obliga
tion imposed upon individuals to ob
serve both the human and moral law:
but as some denythe application of
those laws to nations it jnay net be out
of place to quote the opinion of oth
ers. Jefferson, than whom there Is no
higher political authority, said: l
know of but one code of morality for
men, whether acting singly or col
lectively." Franklin, whose learning,
wisdom and virtue are a part of the.
priceless legacy bequeathed to us from
the revolutionary days, expressed the
same idea in even stronger language
when he said: "Justice is as strictly
due between neighbor nations as be
tween neighbor citizens. "
Force can defend a right, but force
has never yet created a right. If it
was true, as declared in the resolu
tions of intervention, thai the Cubans
"are and of right ought to be free and
Independent" (language taken from tle
Declaration of Independence), it is
equally true that the Filipinos "are
and of right ought to be free and Inde
pendent." , Who will draw a
line between the natural rights of the
Cubans and the Filipinos? Who will
say that the former has a right to lib
erty and that the latter has no rights
Which we are bound to respect?'- And
If the Filipinos ''are m& of right ought
to be free and inuependent" what right
have we to force our government upon
them without their consent?
TH" ARGUMENT OF OBLIGATION,
Also the Contention That Filipinos Cannot
Govern Themselves.
If it is said that we have assumed
before the world- obligations which
make It necessary for us to perma-
Bewaie ol Ointments for Catarrh tf at
Contain Meroury.
as mercury will surley destroy the
sense of smell and completely de
range Hie whola eystem when enter
ing it through the mucous surfaces.
Such articles should never be used
except on prtFcriptions from rep
utable physicians, as the damage
they will do is ten fold the good
you can popsibl derive from thenf.
Hall's Cattarrh ( ure, munufacturMl
by F. J. Cheney & X, Toledo, O.
contains no mercury, and. is. taken
internally, acting dinctly ujrn
he blood and mucous surface of
he8yftem. In buying Hall's Cure
be 6ure you get the genuine. Ilia
taktn inieinnlly and made inToledo
Ohio, by f. J Che r.ey & -Co. Test-'
imcninls frts, fjold bv Drupgists
prk75c per mottle. Ha'ilV F toiily
Pills are the, best.
The state Normal and Industrial College.
OF NORTH CAROLINA
Offtr to jrui g v n in ll . ic ih)iuit.iy, c'fttplcal, fcirntific
an'JoVU5,naI tdulitn d M'f i''l. Ai iniai xi.iiM-e 59
l' mkJ I- iri.fiM Me, 152. Fauli . 20 immUr. Mre
Ihfln 4UOrUlai ULtln !k. Hug ' Biatiictilaitd almoi 2000
fludHitF,i(.r.f(nn; v .curlv in tle.Slie txcepl one
Practice nd Oletvii i, ilt)0 of kI.ow.O uj i!s To k.
cuie t oai i.d doimilorhs, all lre tuiti. i, plit aiions fchouJd
be made before AufcUtt lpt. '
ComP.ondtUce invited from those di siring cmnp-lent trained
teactiHT. . ,
0 For Catalogue iand other inforroatiou a'drpp until August 15fh.
PROF. J. Y. COYKEIDean of Courn
CHARLES D. MclVER, Pn ESI DENT. . '
ELLERBE
Begins its Fall Term August 6th 1900,
ThU school is open alike to BOTH SEXES and is alive to "
the demand of TO-DAY.
4Three courses of instruction are offered Litcrajy, Com
uter cial and Music- .
. ...... .. -
aJrs.T. H. Hart, a teacher of experience ha? charge of thft,
Depatments ..of Music. N
For further information call on or address-
. IH313.ea?TDe 1ST. O
nentlr tnalntaliTa government In-the
Philippine Islands. J, reply, first, thar
the highest oougauon o ima uauuu
is to be true to itself- No obligation to
any particular nation, or to all nations
combined, can require the abandon
ment of otrr-theory of government and
the substitution of -doctrines against
which our whole national life has been
a protest. And, second, that our, obli
gations to the Filipinos who Inhabit
the Islands are greater than any obll
' gatlon which we can owe to foreigners
who have a temporary residence In the
Philippines or desire to trade there. "
It i argued by some that the Fili
pinos are incapable of self-government
and that therefore we owe It to the,
world to take control of them. Ad
miral Dewey, in an oificial report to
the navy department, declared the Fili
pinos more capable of self-government
than the Cubans, and said that he based
his opinion upon a knowledge of botb
races. But I will not rest the cape upon
the relative. advancement of the Fili
pinos. Ilenry Clay, In defending the
rights of the people of Sotth America
to self-government, said: "It is the
doctrine of thrones that man is too ig
norant tp govern himself." - I
contend that it Is to arraign the dispo
sition 6T Providence Uimself to sup
pose that lie bas created beiDgs -Incapable
of governing themselves, and to
be trampled on by kings. Self-government
is the natural government of
men." . .
Clay was right. . - Once ad
mit that some people are frnpable of
self-government and that 4bers are
not, and that the capable people have
a right to seize upon and govern the
incapable, anil you make force brute
force the only -foundation of govern
ment -and Invite the reign of the despot.
Republicans ask: "Shall we haul
down tbe flag that floats over our dead
in the Philippines?" The same ques
tion might have been asked when the
American flag floated over Chapulte
pec and waved over the dead who fell
there; but the tourist who visits the
City of Mex4co finds there a national
cemetery owned by the United States
and cared fdr by an American citizen.
Our flag still floats over our dead," but
when the treaty with Mexico was
signed American authority withdrew
to the, Rio Grande. , "Can
we net govern colonies?" we are asked.
The question Is not what we can do,
but what we ought to do. This nation
(Continued on Second Page.),
A Minister's Good Work.
4"I had a severe attack of bilious
colic, got a bottle of Qbatuherlain's
Colic, Cholera and Qiarrfuiea Rem
edy took two doses and was eutirlet
cured," save Rev. A A. Power, ol
Emporia, Kan. My neigh borr across
the street was sick for over u week
had two or three bottles of medicine
from the "doctor. He. used them for
three or four days wilhout relief,
then called in anoter docor Twho
treated hm for some days and gave
htm no relief, 6o discharged him
I went over to see him the next
morning. He said his bowels were
in a tenihla fix, that they had
been running ofl'eo long that it was
almost bloody flux. I aeked him ii
he had tried Chamberlain's Coliic
Cholr.i and Diairhoea Remedy and
he said, 'No, I. went home and
brought him my bottle and gave
him one dose; told him to take
another dose in fifteen or twenty
minutes if be did not find relief,
but he took no more and was entire
ly curtd." For sale- S. Biggs
CASTOR I A
For Infants and Children.
The Kind You Have Always Bought
Bears tbe
Signature of
1883. 1900.
Greensboro Fcmole ollege,
NORTH CAROLINA.
HI llFKElCil'SUlHlllR m I
CATALOGUE ON APPLICATION.
DRED PEACOCK. President
TRINITY COLLEGE
Offers undergraduate and g r duate
courses. Large number oi eJeclivex
Eight scientific laboratories, equipped
with tiOdern and advanced apparatus
Large additions to library. Complete
gymnasium. Expenses low. Fifty
scholarships to be awarded. ' $cO,'C0O
spent in improvements the pas year.
Send for catalogue.
PRESIDENT KILGO,
Durham.ri, C.
SPRINGS INSTITUTE,
m ..: b ii a - m i, . "-b - . v t - ' i k -
Tho Kind Yoii Hare Always
in use for. over 30 years,
and
Jwji jS7- gonal supervision since its infuiu-j .
4cCU4 Allow no ono to deceive you in this'
All Counterfeits, Imitations and Substitutes are but i:x.
pertinents that triflo with and endanger the health of
Infants and. Children Experience against Experiment.
What is CASTO R I A
Castoria is a substitute for. Castor Oil Paregoric, Drops
and Soothing: Syrups, It Is Harmless and ricasant. it
contains neither Opium Morphine nor other Narcotic
substance. Its agfe Is its gruarantee. It destroys Worm
and allays Fcverishness. It cures Diarrhoea and iw
Colic. It relieves Teething: Troubles, cures Constipation
ad Flatulency It assimilates the Food, regulates tho
Stomach and Bowelsi giving: healthy and natural sk,,
- The Children's Panacea-The Mother's Friend.
CASTOR! A
GENUINE
Bears; tho
I n Use For
i - , THr ecMTaun cMrwr.
, 7
The Kind You
, . . ....... ... - -.
'.' . - Vt;vo.- v..."...-';.'',-.;.:.'-'"-' r' 1
---- s (
The Eknk
T. C. LEAK Presdt.
Capital, - - '
Stockholders' Liabilities,
Surplns Fundi -
Total Responsibility. - - $64,900.00
Transacts a General Banking Business
Directors
T. C. Leah.
Everett,
Wm.Entwistle,
WSL.
i
i
A Few
About
V 1 f A HE, ANGLO-SAXON Writs " to do the Job
IX I Printing oT hS entire Section and is arrang
ing to extend its equipment with thig end in view.
With the. Job Plants of the Rocket and ;he Index
combined we are now;
Thoroughly
for executing the general run of Job Printing in the
very best style, and we respectfully solicit your order..
Our Equipment for supplying your wants in Com
mercial Stationery is the very best and w. believe we
can give you entire satisfaction in this line."
our norro
THE BFST WORK
-3 ..r..-V-
A Full Line of Stationery
I-ETTEU HEADS, NOTE HEAES, il ATI E.NTS.
DILL HEADS, ENVELOPES, CARDS. Etc.-, which
e will furnUh at low pr.;c-a are con8tcnt wi.l,
honest workmanship.
We Would Thank Yn
to give us a chance at anything you may" need in the
Pnuting line of; whatever nature, and if we are not
able to supply you advantageously, e will not l.esi-
tate: tto tell you so and there'll be no harm done.
, - Vours Truly,
The
To
2x.
Anglo
Bonght, and which has been
has born the signature or
has been made under his p r.
ALWAYS
Signature of :
HaveMways Bought
Over 30 Years.
Tf uv Tuerr. ncw vomk errv.
of Pee Dee;
l. PARSONS, Cashic
7t r rt ff s rrm
2 4,!) 5 0.00
15,000.00-
J. P. Leah,
R, L. Steele,
H. C. Dockery,
Parsons.
. . . .
or ds
i
Job Printing.
i
Equipped
i
4
AT A FAIRPRICE
.,;.f-.; ;
we nave Just Received
Saxon Co
TatmtLmrjem. WASH Iff GTON. D.C
e:a;ej)ajajajea