IJJIIU ~ ?r Section Has Always Been ' 0 Grazing Land? Coastal t.-iets Com in? Ahead Cattle *nd spec BT I. I CASE sptriilist <" Heef Sheep V?te: This article was *1 tin br m Cise for The S to **" More each fall thous ^^.^drivon or shipped to feed rf^JLnt and eastern parts of jJrW p t^ Virginia and Tennessee U ?r ltU\\ and then shipped fiirt ar^ . . S?? However, on many farms beef have been bred or fed successfully Ijjsr years as an adjunct to the raising goo, tobacco and other cash crops, [present time this practice is on the und more cattle are being carried purpose of consuming farm grown Sicdfor the production of manure to (su the soil fertility. I one farm the keeping of a beef type m every acre of cotton grown, has been [practice for the past fifteen years. In pdon to receiving a good income from utile as a separate enterprise, this ler states thbt his per acre yields of i hare increased maerially as a result t change from cotton alone. (re, where sufficient pasture can be economically, the keeping of cow |ds and the fatetning of the calves at i W to 14 months of age offers a de Uble source of income. While on farms 1 the keeping (,t breeding herds does Iseem :o Tit into the program satisfactor ily purchase of feeder cattle from our Dtiin breeding grounds and fattening ? for market may well be made a part IT-he annual program. A recent survey in witty in southern Georgia shows that livestock have been introduced as a the farm program that the farm I? thy county are now producing as ? fofWn on 40.000 acres as they for R' oroduced on 100,000 acres without *00* iv TIDEWATER sections tne coastal plains and tidewater sec ts Ij*1' Stlte beef ca^^e production 5 the greatest opportunities for expan .-?e thousands upon thousands of jn(l are at present not producing ? to pay taxes while on many cultl , lrea' tons upon tons of low grade not being utilized. In this part State beef cattle offer great possi tor increasing revenue when carried mentir ^ extensiv? scale or as a sup i.k . y enterprise. Expansion, never pj.',v 0u'd ^ made gradually and Kid fJ1 careful planning for year E/ft. } provision should precede the If that i app0intmt,nt maV result. It is no* h>inrge numbf rs ?f native cattle tiiimmp. 0n native Brasses during f *ith rin on the beaches in the wln Ns ii! provision for feed. Such h Ml* r0dUfinS SOme pr0fit* re" to* thi ?uequate gains and there is ' fceds ?rowln? of supplemen l! the a S prove Profltable. Nilton n .d ^Periment Station in Clrryin., u native reeds are used ' * herd of cattle for about Trench Silo Offers Inexpensive Means Storing Green Feed For Dairy Herd BT J. A. AREY, Extension Dairyman ???HIS TYPE OP SILO has grown in pop | ularity In North Carolina very rapidly during the past three years as shown by the number dug. During 1932, the first year this type of silo was used in the State, 41 were dug, in 1933 171 and in 1934, 372. Present indications are that there will be around 400 dug this summer. The trench silo is an inexpensive type of silo. It Is well adapted to the medium to small size herd on which the initial cost of the upright silo and the type of cutting equipment required to fill it is rather heavy. The labor cost on many of the trench silos already dug has been around 50 cents per ton. In many cases no actual cash was paid for digging since it was done during odd times by the regular farm labor. The material needed for the roof of an average size trench silo can usually be secured on the farm at small cost. The construction of the trench silo is simple and can be accomplished with or dinary farm labor. The only tools needed consists of a plow, drag pan, shovel, pick and a team of mules or tractor. The equipment required for filling the trench silo is less expensive than that re quired in filling the vertlcle silo since a small cutter without blower will do the work satisfactory. Such a cutter with a capacity of three to five tons per hour that can be operated with a 5 H. P. gasoline engine, now quoted at $75 to $100. LOCATION To give best results the trench silo shouM be located convenient to the place where the cattle are to be fed, and where gocd drainage is possible. The most desirable soil is a stiff clay free from rock. Wh3u possible It Is best to locate the trench s'lo on a slope or hillside, digging the trench back into the hill. By giving the bottom of the trench a slight slope towards the lower end natural drainage can be secured. When a hillside location is not available, it is often possible to drain the trench by means of a small tile leading to a ditch or other lower elevation. Small stones should be placed around the intake so as to prevent silage from clogging the tile. CAPACITY The size of the trench silo should be determined by the number of animals to be fed and the length of the feeding period The depth mutiplled by the average width and that by the length will give the capa city In cubic feet. For example; a trench silo, six feet deep, seven feet wide at the top and five at the bottom (averaging six feet wide) and 70 long would equal 6x6x70 or 2520 cubic feet. The average weight of a cubic foot of silage from a trench silo Is about 35 pounds. In this case the total weight would be 2520x35 or 88,200 pounds. The number of cubic feet of silage needed can be determined by multiplying the num ber of cows to be fed by the number of days in the feeding period, since the aver age cow will consume a cubic foot of silage each day. For example, to feed a medium size herd of 24 cows 180 days would require 24x180 or 4320 cubic feet of silage. The width and depth of the trench silo should also be governed by the number of cows to be fed dally. A slice of silage three to five inches thick beginning at the top and extending to the bottom of the silo should be fed daily in order to pre vent spoilage. When the area represented by the width and depth is too large for the number of cows to be fed daily, ex cessive spoilage will take place. Capacity should be secured by Increasing the length of the silo rather than the width or depth. Table 1 gives te size of the herd, the suggested width, depth and length of the silo based on feeding a cow one cubic fcot of sllige daily for a period of 180 days. Tabe 1 ? Suggested Dimensions for Trench Silo Length Based No. of Width Width at on 180 Days Cows At Top Bottom Depth Feeding Feet Feet Feet Period Feet 6 6 4 5 43 8 6 4 5 58 10 7*5 5 60 12 7 5 6 60 14 7 5 6 70 16 8 6 6 ?9 18 8 6 7 66 20 9 7 7 64 24 10 8 7 69 constrution After the location is determined measure off the desired area and mark each corner with a stake. Plow the land within the nine months of the year. From two to three acres are sufficient to graze a mature ani mal for this length of time if the season is normal. Calves running with their dams with no supplementary feed will usually weigh about 400 pounds at weaning time. There are thousands upon thousands of acres of this type of grazing that is not now being utilized and it is thought that eventually such areas will be more generally utilized for cattle grazing. This type of feed is too coarse for other types of livestock such as sheep or dairy cattle but beef cattle make admirable ust 9t it. ' ? , , ... ? / joh */ a. /?