<Tf)r laily aar Heel
Kids are first in charters
It’s interesting to see people’s reactions to the proposed
charter schools in our area. Supporters of charter schools
say they give parents more choice —and input in their
kids’ education. Although it’s too early to fully assess the
schools’ effect on learning, a recent
article in Investor Business Daily
titled “Unshackling Nation’s
Schools Liberated Charter
Schools Get Results, Win Kudos, ” shows that first results from
other states are encouraging.
Charter schools are public schools released from many
government rules. They are run by an independent board that
includes parents, teachers and principals. But with greater
freedom to make rules and set auricula comes greater respon
sibility. If schools fail to perform, their charters are revoked.
“Liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats
have decided that this is a really good idea,” said Joe Nathan,
author of “Charter Schools: Creating Hope and Opportunity. ”
“Charter schools bring together three very powerful, central
concepts of America: freedom and choice, accountability and
entrepreneurship. That is quite a winning combination.”
Charter schools matter because they are redefining what a
public school is, said Chester Finn Jr., senior fellow at the
Hudson Institute. “The charter school idea says you can be a
public school if you’re open to the public, paid for by the public
and accountable to the public —but you can be run by
anybody,” he added.
While charter school legislation varies from state to state, a
common theme is greater freedom and competition. Charter
schools may not discriminate, may not be religious and can’t
charge tuition. But they can structure programs as they wish.
Arizona passed one of the strongest charter school laws in
the country in 1994. Today, 118 of Arizona’s 1,200 schools are
Charter schools which draw from wide areas. The greater
choice has created a more competitive environment.
“We have seen several examples of new charter schools
opening near public schools and then enrolling one-third of the
kids,” said Jeffry Flake, executive director of the Goldwater
Institute, an Arizona think tank. “Too many public schools
have ignored parents, and charters are responding to the public’s
needs.”
This happened at Queen Creek Elementary School in Phoe
nix. One-third of the parents were fed up with a weak “whole
language” reading curriculum at their schools. So the parents
put their kids into anew charter school in the area.
■ . At Vaughn Street Elementary in Los Angeles, students
scored in the 1 Oth percentile before it became a charter school.
Now students are scoring in the 40th and 50th percentiles.
But not all charter schools work. California and Arizona
have each seen a charter school close down.
URIC fans should learn
lesson from UVa. students
,Vo'THE EDITOR: ' J',- ?
I wish to comment on the letter by
Sabrina Walton (“Conduct of UVa. fans
aftergame inexcusable, dangerous, ” Nov.
.!?)•
„ .I’m glad you got some exposure to the
real world of college football on Satur
day. I’m not condoning the “obscenities
.and obscene gestures” that you had to
endure after the Virginia come from be
hind victory (heaven forbid that you did
anything to stimulate these fans), and I
sincerely regret that one member was
hurt, but maybe there are a few things
that Carolina fans can learn about sup
porting a top football team from this
freak incident of (gasp) overenthusiasm.
Let’s face it, North Carolina is a bas
ketball state. It always has been, and
.always will be, and as long Dean Smith
coaches hoops here Mack Brown’s team
will always be No. 2. Now Virginia on
the other hand is a football state, and that
title makes things a little different up
there. As opposed to students at UNC,
students at UVa. stay until the end of
football games, do not need a “Mike
Man” and the drum line pounding “Stick
it in!” to find a reason to cheer and tear
down the goal posts at the end of big
victories. When was the last time the goal
posts at Kenan Stadium came down?
As “wine and cheese” crowds rule
Kenan Stadium and the Smith Center, it
is a shame that students here miss out on
the true big time college sports experi
ence. Granted the UNC football (AP poll
No. 13) and basketball (AP poll No. 7)
teams are truly top level, it is a shame that
the fans lack far behind in their truly
unbridled and raucous support of the
blue and white.
Perhaps we are all just too busy binge
drinking and worrying about the intellec
tual climate on campus to get plum crazy
at sporting events.
Floris Iking
FRESHMAN
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Letter writers 1 cONcEpt
(of fashion) needs work
TO THE EDITOR:
This is in response to both of the Nov.
20 letters to the editor (“Masala Fashion
Show receives inadequate coverage” and
“cONcEpt (of colors) fashions at Masala
Show in poor taste”). First, in regards to
inadequate coverage, I cannot say any
thing in defense of The Daily Tar Heel’s
coverage of cultural issues as a whole,
but I must bring out that the Nov. 18
article covering the Masala show (“Di
verse Masala Show features spicy cul
tural fashions”) was a fashion review, as
indicated below the byline. It was not
meant to be a sales pitch or promotion of
the involved multicultural organizations
nor was the writer responsible for
qupting any of the organizations’ own
promotions. A fashion review is to re
view fashion being the opinion of the
Community voices
But that’s the point, says Finn, a former U.S. Education
Department official. “It’s a sign of strength that charters work
because when one fails we don’t keep it on life support.”
“Please tell me how many regular schools have been closed
for cause,” said Finn.
The results are forcing districts to change. One Phoenix
principal is trying to lure kids back to his school. He’s visiting
each parent to find out what his school needs to do to compete.
Charter schools’ opponents say the movement would create
a two-tier education system where affluent parents send their
kids to charters while leaving poorer kids in decaying schools.
That hasn’t happened so far.
A survey by the Hudson Institute points out that 63 percent
of students in charter schools are non white. Nearly one-fifth are
black, and 30 percent are Hispanic. Most charter students are
poor and eligible for subsidized federal lunch programs. Many
have limited English proficiency (19 percent), and one in every
five charter students has a disability.
Another study by the Education Commission of the States
found that half of charter schools serve “at risk" youth
disabled, delinquents, dropouts and others with special needs.
Two-thirds of charter schools are designed to serve a cross
section of students. Some serve the deaf, home-schooled stu
dents or juvenile criminals. Choice 2000, a California charter
school, serves students online via computers. And New Visions
in Minneapolis targets inner-city kids.
Many teachers like their freedom and accountability. Char
ter schools empower individual teachers.
Some 62 percent of Arizona charter school teachers chose to
teach at charters because of the school’s mission, curriculum
and students. More than three-quarters plan to return next year.
Some six teachers in 10 negotiate their contracts directly with
the school director. Fully 95 percent of charter school teachers
have benefits. Three-fourths of charter schools have computers
in the classroom. And 35 percent of the teachers have parent
volunteers in their classrooms.
Parents seem happy, too, even though most charters require
parents to be involved with the school and their children.
Another Goldwater survey found 92 percent of Arizona’s
charter school parents were satisfied or very satisfied with their
school.
In conclusion, I hope that our area school boards do not see
charter schools as a threat, but as an opportunity to find out
what our schools need to do to compete with local charter
schools. There isn’t any good reason why our public schools
can’t offer the increased accountability and greater parental
input which seem to be keys to charter schools’ popularity.
Gene Galin is a former Chatham County School Board candidate from
Chapel Hill.
GENEGALIN
GUEST COLUMNIST
reviewer, the exart same concept as that
of book, movie, music and theater re
views.
How many quotations does one find
in these reviews? The accusation that the
review’s writer “did not even get the gist
of the purpose of the show” was com
pletely off base, considering that a quote
by members of the Masala steering com
mittee was included that explained clearly
the educational and expository purpose
of the event. The fart stands, though, that
the event was called the Masala Fashion
Show and was intended to be an exhibi
tion of culture through fashion it was
a fashion show. The fashion review
treated it as such. Ifit was not intended to
be taken as such, it certainly should not
have been hyped as such. The fashion
review was appropriate coverage
whether or not it was enough coverage or
whether it should have been allotted more
space or prominence by the DTH was
beyond the control of the writer.
Now, I turn to the second letter deal
ing with the “poor taste” of cONcEpt
Couture. Ladies, I celebrate your right to
express your opinion, but this was a fash
ion show, and it was intended to turn the
Great Hall into a catwalk. The designs
that so disgusted you were the product of
the multicultural collaboration group
cONcEpt (of Colors). In fart, they were
the debut line of the fashion design team,
cONcEpt Couture. Their designs repre
sented multicultural influences beyond
the specific ethnic dress presented by the
rest of the show; they were the result of a
multicultural effort. They played an im
portant part in the entire picture of world
culture and increasing multiculturalism
in the future. Yes, few of their designs
could be termed practical, but fashion is
more than just Guess? jeans and Gap
shirts: it is a true art form, and innovative
fashion design takes talent and deserves
credit. To call it a “disrespectful display
of’fashion,”’ is an attack on the cONcEpt
(of Colors) organization. The cONcEpt
Couture designs warranted respect,
should have been taken more seriously
by the audience, and were certainly an
appropriate part of the “cultural outlet”
provided by the Masala Fashion Show.
Mary Bryson
SOPHOMORE
ENGUSH/CREATIVE WRITING
Football team not only
deserving activity at UNC
TO THE EDITOR:
In response to David Wessel’s letter,
“Football fans at UVa. game spoiled,
unsupportive of team,” (Nov. 22): You
know what gets my goat? Whiners. They
contribute to noise pollution, they don’t
make much sense and they tend to be
some of the more hypocritical individu
als you will ever meet. I have a couple of
questions for you.
First question: How many student
events have you attended this year, Dave
(not including football games and vari
ous parties)? I am talking about such
events as student band/orchestra/choral
READERS’FORUM
The Daily Tar Heel welcomes reader comments and criticism. Letters to the
editor should be no longer than 400 words and must be typed, double
spaced, dated and signed by no more than two people. Students should
include their year, major and phone number. Faculty and staff should
include their title, department and phone number. The DTH reserves the
right to edit letters for space, clarity and vulgarity. Bring letters to the DTH
office at Suite 104, Carolina Union, mail them to P.O. Box 3257, Chapel
Hill, NC 27515 or e-mail forum to: dth@unc.edu.
concerts, student theatrical productions,
multicultural events, etc. These people
put in a good deal of work, and I would
go so far as to say that none of them
receive the support they deserve.
Second question: How many times
this year have you woken up for a class
and thought to yourself, “I’m still tired.
I’m going back to sleep.” David, these
teachers put in a lot of time and effort to
see that you receive the education you
will need to make it in the world. Most of
them don’t get payed for half the work
they do. They deserve our support.
I’m not trying to say that this school is
possessed of the nation’s best fans. Yes,
we should be packing the stadium for
every home game. If the football team
wants to (complain) about our shortcom
ings as a cheering section, they can. They
have earned that right. But, hey, I’ll be
the first to admit that if I wake up on a
cold and rainy Saturday morning, and I
am a) still tired, b) hungover or c) both, I
am going back to sleep, football game or
no. That’s just common sense.
What I am trying to say here is that
none of the student organizations on this
campus receive the support they earn
through their extensive extracurricular
work. In fart, the whole word “deserve,”
in general, just doesn’t have much mean
ing anymore. You may have been to a
few football games and know a cheer or
two, but that gives you no right to go
riding around on some kind of “I’m the
good fan” high horse. Instead of com
plaining about the situation, why don’t
you do something constructive? Become
a cheerleader.
Wes Baker
SOPHOMORE
PSYCHOLOGY/DRAMA
Commissioner candidate
gives thanks for support
TO THE EDITOR:
In this season ofThanksgi ving, I would
like to take this opportunity to thank the
citizens who supported me in my candi
dacy for Orange County Commissioner.
I appreciate the calls and remarks made
to me and my family members. I can
assure you, I will continue to be involved
in the county. I will continue to speak out
OP-ED
Reform Party will return
I am absolutely ashamed, appalled and disgusted with my
generational peers. Again, the 18- to 35-year-olds have
cast their ballots this year for Bill Clinton. In 1992, many
political pundits believed Generation Xers were responsible for
electing Clinton. My generation
voted for Clinton on the premise
that he was bringing “change” to
government and that he would en-
sure that our government be prepared for the next millennium.
While Clinton and his supporters point at certain areas in
which government works better (and in some cases, this is true),
we still have a dying patient on the table our federal
government —and our president has made no efforts to stop the
bleeding. We’re only repairing the patient’s broken pinkie toe
and ignoring the stake in its chest.
Yes, the deficithas been cut 63 percent. Meanwhile, Clinton’s
own budget reports predict an ever-increasing deficit after he
leaves office. By the year 2020, the deficit will reach about $1.5
trillion per year, and in 2030, we’ll have a $4.1 trillion deficit.
(Keep in mind that our national debt is only $5.3 trillion today.)
This is a burden that Bill Clinton will never have to manage. It
will be on my generation’s shoulders.
Government overhead has been trimmed. But government
operations only account for a small sliver of our government’s
budget about 0.9 percent of the federal budget. We need to
get serious if want to balance the budget. We waste our time
with discussions on cutting aid to schools, reducing environ
mental protections and slashing aid to farms. Education and
training services occupy only about 3 percent of our federal
budget, environmental protection gets 1.5 percent and agricul
ture accounts for 0.6 percent.
No major elected official has touched the third rail of
politics: entitlements. Our deficit will amount to about sllO
billion next year, or about 8 percent of federal spending. If we
need to permanently cut 8 percent of our budget in order to
balance it, we need to begin looking at the largest area of
spending: entitlements, where our government spends 57 per
cent of its $ 1.519 trillion budget.
Our entitlement programs are large now, but what’s fright
ening is that our entitlement programs are projected to grow
exponentially into the next century. While we may not want to
cut benefits already promised, we must rethink our programs
for the next generation. If we cut tiny programs that will hurt
our country, we might temporarily balance the budget.
However, if we don’t get our entitlement programs under
control, we will never have a chance to permanently balance
the budget.
No one talks about this. I’m still waiting for the discussions
to get serious. I seriously doubt any current politicians will stop
the runaway growth of entitlement programs. It will be my
on issues. I hope you will do the same
because collectively we should affect the
decision making process.
Even though I did not receive enough
votes, we made an excellent showing. I
am proud I ran a clean, honest campaign.
In fart, if you remove Chapel Hill Town
ship, Mr. Carey and I swapped places.
This points out the weakness of our cur
rent at large system. We need to seriously
consider a true district or proportional
representation, which will yield a more
diverse and better county commission.
In Orange County people want to wear
the progressive label. A number of these
“progressive”’ folks discriminate against
others because they are Republicans. As
a Republican, I experienced this first
hand. If that is a progressive characteris
tic then I will never wear that label. I vote
for the individual. The data shows that
21,519 voters or 47.6 percent voted a
straight Democrat or Republican ticket.
Almost three to one, straight tickets went
Democrat. I have voted in 10 general
elections and have split my ticket nine of
those 10 times. One friend told me that if
Jesus Christ was running as a Republican
in this county he would lose. Ellie
Kinnaird says she wants campaign re
form. I suggest that if she is truly commit
ted to this task to begin by introducing a
bill that would include outlawing straight
party ticket voting.
Patrick Mulkev
CHAPEL HILL
UNO's beauty threatened
by growing garbage pile
TO THE EDITOR:
The DTH headline “Recycling rises
as town waits for new landfill” (Nov. 20)
might have been restated as “Landfill
rises while town waits for recycling.”
The landfill is rising because the recycled
garbage now goes in a big pile, rather
than being buried.
At present the garbage pile remains
below the treetops, but it is rising steadily
toward them. The staff has advised that
the pile is projected to grow to the 100-
foot level by 2004, meaning that it most
likely will be above the treetops by 1998
or so, visible for about 10 miles in every
generation that will have to deal with it.
The current administration gave us the largest tax increase in
history. And a child bom today will pay an 82 percent tax rate,
according to page 25 of Clinton’s own 1995 budget report.
We’re building a bridge to the 21st century, but we’re borrow
ing the money to pay for it at the expense of my generation.
Trade deals with Mexico have sent thousands of jobs across
the border. The creators of the North American Free Trade
Agreement promised a trade surplus with Mexico, but we’ve
accumulated S7O billion in trade deficits with Mexico since
NAFTA’s inception. My generation worries about the environ
ment, and NAFTA dealt a giant blow to environmental protec
tion in the South by loosening controls in Mexico. Pollutants
stream across to the United States via the northerly air currents
that blow from Mexico. When my peers graduate from college,
will they need to move to another country to find a job?
I feel the need to mention campaign financing. Clinton’s
campaign and the Democrats have accepted millions in illegal
contributions. (And the Republicans certainly aren’t innocent
either.) In 1995 Clinton shook hands with Newt Gingrich, and
they promised we would receive real campaign finance reform.
Instead, all efforts were stifled. Now that Clinton’s illegal
practices have been exposed, he has called for reform again.
Will we get it? Any bookie will give you odds against it.
My generation will owe more than any other in American
history. Already, each individual’s share of the national debt is
$20,000. According to government reports, our government
officially has a negative net worth to the tune of $2,983 trillion.
Unofficially, when you add Social Security, federal pension
liabilities and other government “promises,” the government
has between a sl4 trillion and sl7 trillion negative net worth.
Fellow Generation Xers, you now know what you got for
your vote. Was it a fair exchange?
Over the next few years, the Reform Party will continue to
research issues and develop solutions. The National College
Reform Party is taking a giant step by planning several forums
called “Workshop for the Next Generation. ” These workshops
will feature well-known political figures and participants from
groups such as Concord Coalition, Third Millennium, Eco
nomic Security 2000 and U.S. Junior Chamber of Commerce.
Is Clinton the president who will prepare our country for the
next generation? Only if we want more of the same.
The Reform Party is in its infancy. The Reform Party will
grow so that it will have strength for the presidential election in
2000, when it will have a presidential candidate who can give
my generation and other Americans true change, renewal and
reform.
Scott Sanders is the deputy coordinator for the National College Reform
Party. He is a junior political science major at Rutgers University.
| SCOn SANDERS |
GUEST COLUMNIST
direction. Once built, the pile is likely to
be there forever, becoming a permanent
part of the skyline. Landfill management
has also proposed a second bigger pile,
beginning in 2005 and rising thereafter.
One wonders what the visual impart
ofthese garbage piles will be, particularly
since they will be within sight of all of
downtown Chapel Hill and Carrboro,
the University, its Hospital and much of
140, wherever the view towards north
ern Chapel Hill is unobstructed.
Will UNC-Chapel Hill become UNC
at Garbage City? That’s not been evalu
ated, but certainly the manicured image
of the village is likely to be affected.
Roger Barr
CHAPEL HILL
Kinnaird thanks students
for hard campaign work
TO THE EDITOR:
I want to thank all of the students who
worked so hard on my campaign for state
Senate, especially the Young Democrats,
Student Environmental Action Commit
tee and Students for Choice. Your help
was invaluable to winning so decisively.
I also appreciate the help of many
others on campus who made my victory
possible. The State Employees Associa
tion and the Housekeepers, whose en
dorsements meant so much, put in many
hours on my behalf. And thanks to all the
others who supported me in our com
mon quest to bring the important issues
to this campaign. In addition to the envi
ronment and campaign finance reform,
many issues directly affect our Univer
sity. Graduate students need permanent
funding for health insurance, our librar
ies need adequate support to maintain
the high standards required for a great
university, research must be kept com
petitive and salaries for all, from house
keepers to staff and faculty should not be
sacrificed in a political battle.
I pledge to work hard for our outstand
ing institution and thank you for joining
me in representing our shared goals in
the Legislature.
Ellie Kinnaird
N.C. SENATOR-ELECT
Diversions: magazine's
sinister source for news?
TO THE EDITOR:
In light of recent events, we feel we
cannot hold our tongues any longer. Over
the past 12 months, we have noticed
something sinister: a conspiracy which
involves our own beloved Daily Tar Heel.
Specifically we refer to the Diversions
“Weekly Entertainment Section" and one
of its contributors, Dean Hair. We both
subscribe to Entertainment Weekly and
have been appalled to note their blatant
borrowing (dare we say plagiarism) of
Mr. Hair’s work. A recent example in
volves information on a forthcoming
Laveme and Shirley movie informa
tion which appeared in EW a week prior
to its publication in the DTH. Not only
Monday, December 2,1996
has EW used Hair as an uncredited
source, they’ve actually used a time ma
chine to make it seem as if they had the
inside scoop.
In investigating this temporal thiev
ery, we stumbled across an even more
alarming example. The EW review of
“Toy Story” (Nov. 24,1995) contains no
less than 14 suspicious word choices/
sentences from Mr. Hair’s review in the
DTH —a review published six days later
(Nov. 30,1995). What are the possibili
ties of two different reviewers describing
the “anarchic impulses” ofthe film? Both
reviews are available on the World Wide
Web: EW’s at http://
www.pathfinder.com under their movie
review section; Mr. Hair’s may be found
in the DTH archives online at http://
www.unc. edu/dth/archives/113095/
art.html#arto2. We encourage you to
examine them yourselves.
It is our hope that by breaking our
silence the DTH can stop these Time
(Wamer) Bandits before they strike again.
Kevin Hanna
JUNIOR
COMMUNICATIONS
Brandon Orotallo
JUNIOR
COMMUNICATIONS
DTH should look in mirror,
feature intellectual events
TO THE EDITOR:
While The Daily Tar Heel’s intellec
tual climate articles were interesting, I
was disappointed that the DTH did not
take the opportunity to examine its own
role in the visibility of extracurricular
activities on campus. As the school’s
most widely received medium, the DTH
must balance questions of profit with its
obligations to the community it serves;
but features such as “twenty-four seven”
and the Campus Calendar are inadequate
resources because they only deliver in
formation to those people who are al
ready looking for it. If the DTH is really
serious about improving the intellectual
climate on this campus, it must work
hard to prominently feature important
campus events.
Case in point: On Nov. 13, the Bull’s
Head Bookshop’s Youth Angst Society
series staged a joint reading with the
campus literary magazine, Cellar Door,
on the occasion of its fall release and
honoring the winners of a literary contest
co-sponsored by the magazine and Bull’s
Head. The DTH included a small blurb
in the University Briefs section the day of
the reading and a photo the following
day nothing else.
On Dec. 3, Cellar Door will co-host a
reading with Sauti Mpya, the Sonja H.
Stone Black Cultural Center’s literary
journal, in the Union Cabaret. I hope the
DTH will show a stronger interest in
promoting the event. In the meantime,
the magazine is available free of charge
in Bull’s Head.
Jonathan Farmer
EDITOR
CELLAR DOOR
13