si
-V'
TV--; -
Ni
VOL. XXII,
FRIDAY. FERBUARY t6, 1821.
f 9-
JT VA V-Ki y aSlt
Li
A-
ON NATIOKAL INDUSTRY -;
v - ' Y Concluded. J I
, - r. .'. i ' ' . " -
- . t . ' - -
We: conclude this appeal to the A me
ilcan people y noticing the leading ob
jections, which have been nrped agaiiist
the protection of tbe labor of the country.
We shall first advert to the allegation
that it i unconstituticfnal for Congress to
legislate for the protection of 'American
against foreign industry , We are. told,
that the legislature of the nation have no
' right waterialiy to control the, pursuits
and occupations of individual, and to say
that this avocation shall be followed; and
that another shall not. Now the friends
of a system of protectibn haye never con -
. 'tended-5 that Congress has a right to de
clare, by' statute, that no more farms shall
be cultivated, that no more ships shall be
built; nor any more cloth manufactured :
thescare points foreign to the question at
'issue. The Cpnstitution tells uvthat Con
gress has the power to regulate commerce
Wim irrejgn nations ana provitir wr uic
general welfare of the Union ; and Jt is
surely inconsistent to say, that when the
importation of foreign .manufactures de
stroys the prosperity and paralizes the
enterprize and industry of the nation,
Ccngress have no right to adopt a reme
dy. In such a case, we are not controlling
cur own, but pr&ventine the; interference
of foreign - industry '.with the interests ot
the country. . Let us take a case that
"vould be no miracle in this fertile age of
venders. 1 Suppose the Allied powers of
'Europe should convene at ' Vienna, and
agree to wage a "settled warfare against
American manufactures, and thus retard
cur advancement, to national wealth and
power; and also agree , to exclude our a
gricultural produce from ev ry market in
Europe. -Let us 'suppose. that a system
cf bounties, ; premiums, ' and extravagant
privileges, is adopted; and in one year,
two hundred millions of foreign fabrics
are sent to the United States, and sold off
by. means of the auctions, at a reduced
price, & cur manufactures crusherVtbere
by in one heap of ruins how. long ".would
it be the duty cf the American Congress
to cherish, constitutional scruples and
coolly behold the desolating operation of!
such a policy ? Where then would be the
"welfare of the Union? Would not Con
gress have a right to say to the allied pow
crs of Europe, we will not permit one ar
ticle of your manufactures to enter the
United States ? Would they not have the
power, s in such a case,' to protect three
hundred millions cf capital that might be
invested in manufacturing establishments
in this' country? And does not the great
er power include the lesser ? We do not
call upon Congress to regelate and re
strain the pursuits of individuals we ask
them to correct the evils flowing from
foreign interference It is somewhat sin
gular that Congress; for many years past,
have granted bounties to promote parti
cular branches of.industry if they have
no power to delend the salutary tendency
of such bounties, against foreign rivalsh;p
and hostility. ! And it is equall) so, that
.neither John Jay, James Madisop, nor A
lexander Hamiltcn, whose comments on
the Constitutica cf the United States will
control public opinion - for ages, never
dreamt of the" debits and apprehensions
now under consideration. We. refer par
ticularly Gen. Hamilton. He was one
cf the greatest constitutional lawyers that
ever adorned the American forum : and
jet, when he drew his celebrated report
in favor of protecting domestic manufac
tures in the manner now demanded, he
saw nothing in the Constitution to debar
Ccngress from pursuing the policy which
he laid down and vindicated, y If there be
any in the ranks bf our epposers 'superior,
to this illustrious statesman, let him come
forth. i ''r- . . . . x - ' :. .
We are also infbrmed.that every branch
cf national industry should be left to regu
late itself and -that protection and re-
straints are impolitic and ruinous. If
there .was but one nation in the world,
, this doctrine' might be sound ; but while
there are different ndtions, possessing tbe
same capacities, there will be separate
and conflicting intcrests, and each nation
will watch qver its own welfare. - Look
to. England, to Prance, to Russia, the
German states, & to every nation in Eu-rope--cpen
the history of m odern policy,
. and it will be seen that every wise govern
ment protects" her own industry. . Rusia,v
young as she is in the list of civiliztd na
tions, has a tariff that prohibits more than,
two hundred articles cf foreign manufac:
tures to protect her owp industry. Enfc-
auu prouiuiw - aimost eyery article ot a
. gricultiire and manufacture. . France, al
though England aided her in putting Louis
HI. on, his throne, will not . sutler, an'
English commodityrof any description to
Prejudice the prosperity of her own labor.
.er. All Europe presents ; but one vast
)stem of regulations restraints and
Prohibition for the protection of domes
c industry ;l and ;yet when we talk of
king care of our own interests like other
rjbousJeave ttingVic? themselves is the
JJ " M the nation of the,: eastern' contl
would abolish their tariffs and com
foil lal reSulations, this Icountfy ;would
low. the example ; but prudence, nav
"preservaUoi) forbids, that we should
' : - : -.ADDRESS
vl;:
H take, the tead in so preposterous a course.
x ins uuiii.iiv. 'r o ' ; ,-
selyes.is a'new doctrine in this( country:
We heanl nothing of it under the admi
nistrations' of Washineton, Adams &
fersonl Wby have we laid heavy duties
on .the "tonnage;, of foreign:, vessels, but to
protect American tonnage ? Why ' have
we; excluded foreign bottoms from our
coasting,trade I Why;: for twenty years.
have we proteqteo: our nsnenes oy uoun
lies Let Mi Jrfferson's report of. 1791
answer the question. He will tell you,
that this polky; of giving bounties ongmar
ted in a resolution to protect our fisheries
against foreign ; competition. 0pon this
principle,, wny nas not commerce Deen
left to hersHf ?;Why has more than
S8,00O.O0O been' paid into the Mediterra
nearf fund rby the, consumers of foreign
manufactures, but - to ; protect commerce
bevondf the . straits of Gibraltar? Why
was war declared, & more than 70,000,000
dollars expended, but to secure protection;
to this branch of industry f JLet tne Ame
rican people reflect on these fact.""
.We also heftrl' daily asserted, that the
protection of j industry will diminish foT
reign commence, and thus destroy our
nursery of seamen.' When England be
gan to open canals, and Encourage inland
trade, the same apprehension was ex
pressed. The greatest nursery of Ame
rican seamen has always beenfouad in
the fisheries. It was so in the revolution.
Mr. Seybert, m his able , work rn the sta
tistics of the United States, has made the,
following judicious remarks Our fish
eries constitute the best nursery for that
hardy, race of citiztn seamen, who feel
the. Jove of country, and are, therefore,
willing to maintain its rights; and they
are also the sources to which commerce
mukt look for
In addition to
its defenders." (pV 340.)
the fisheries,- we must rci
j collect the bold, hardy, and expert sea-
men which aire bred up in the coasting
I the cfa nftfct frnrrt "J"w OrI;nc In P.'iQt-
port, and consider the immense trade
which will bej carried on between these
two extremities of the maritime frontier,
our apprehensions subside on this subject.
Our fisheries,) our coasting trade,: and the
extensive Commerce which we shall air
ways have wfyi distant quarters of the
globe, will enable us to call forth defend
ers of the Arrjerican flag, even if the in
dustry of the nation is duly protected and
encouraged, j
Another fruitful source of objection to
the encouragement of national industry
is, the alleged immoral tendency of manu
facturing establishments. Whenever this
topic is introduced, the condition of Eng
land is brougrjt forward. Nothing is said
of Holland, Austria, or France. Great
Britain is placed before our eyes as the
sink of abominations. Yet the example
of Englard ha!s but little bearing on the
question in application to this country.
She possesses a small territory; crowded
population, and, for generations, has been
the great workshop of Europe. Her ma
nufacturing' establishments are unparal
leled in extent Her laborine manufac
turers are, to ja great extent, destitute of
earjy education, anci oi moral instruction,
and have grown up in the" neglect of mo
ral habits." Pnring the fluctuations of the
commercial world, fof a fe.w years past,
this immense pop-clation has been driven
to many despprate .actsV by the pressure
of public burdens, the loss of employment,
anci the sufferings 0f hunger. But.what is
preposed in the' United States ? vNot that
l.ige manufajcturing towns shall spring
up rn every. side, to be filled with' starving
and degraded thousands, whose perpetual
apprehension jwill l be the . want of bread ;
not that our agricultural population shall
be transferred, trsjn the soil to cities that
we'may furnish surplus manufactures to
a great portion of the vorld ; but that we
may cherish such establishments, at con
venient places, where jthtre are great na
tural advantages, as will be necessary to
supply our own wants,and render our ag
gregate laborjmore productive. But why
is it necessaryj that manufacturing esta
blishments should be tbe abodes of vice
and profligacy ? Is there any thing in the
pursuits ot an artihcer intrinsically yi-
cipus ? . Surely there is
cation is attended to ;
not. It earlv-edu
if early moral ha-
bits are inculcated and( enforced if strict
nc wholesome' internal reeulations are
'adopted the excesses fof English manu-
rtacturmg towns may ne avoided.-.-. I here
are now. many extensive. manuiactcnes in
the United Spates, and we; lock into them
in vain for instances of moral debasement,
or, frjr atrocious crimesr Ncr do we ste,
why this fact should not remain the same.
,Tfie mild iind wholesome tendency of our
'Civil . institutions -thel; school establish
ments of the count ryf-the great abund
ance of the- necessaries of life the nume-r
rcusTincitenjeiJts to; industry and 'enter
prize iucuc us to bt lie ve r that it would.
It has been agahi. and again asserted,'
thatvd6mestic " manufactures re ,nbw ra
pidly increasing in the. United States, by
means oi iamuy muusiry, 'ana require no
lurtber protection.? W e are, inueed, bap
py.tp see thousands of farnUits supply iug
.heruselves itli articles ;ol' -pVcessUy by.
meausot thVirtjwn - laborT . But they can -not
be e xpecied to besuccesstulty eiigaed
in manul ctiiies requiring extensn t cajii
cal and the' 1 application of laboWsaviiig
bachinery. :;WiU they, supply theiiation
J with roanufactnres of ironV glassy paper, j
woollen ' cotton, and lead f Jo one can
pretend it ; and yet these articles are vi
tally essential to the happfacsscf the na
tion,' ;apd we are paying tens of , millions,
annually, to foreign nations, for furnishing
us with them. - Lt the distinction here
drawn, be well considered. -' :
i : By affording further 7 protection to the
manufactures of this countnT; it is thought
by many, that smuggling, to an enormous
extent, wm take piacev it is very singu
lar, that this alarming abuse has not beea
de.irecaied at an earner period. On ma-i
nyU, .ides, liable to be smuggled into our
ports and harbors dc5a vzgfiy spices,
winesj and silks, the; duties are already
sufficiently high to form' the inducement";
and "for the bareprotectiori of domestic
manufactures of iron; glass," lead, woollen
and Cotton it is not required that? they
should be liigher than an average of the
former articles. The temptation is now
stronger to smuggle spices, teas, and ma
ny, other light and : expensive eortvmbdi
ties,' than .it would - be to smuggle irprt,
glass, woollen, cotton, and other manu
factures, if adequately protected. Qu this
point,-; a. false J alarm has been sounded,
and that too, by' the very persons who vin
dicate the auction system, which' is even J
more procmciive oi morai lurpiiuuc man
any smuggling that can be 'Carried on.
"Vre are inclined to adopt the opinio;?, that
when 'the 'manufactures fof Jron, glass,
lead, paperr cotton and woollen, are pro
secuted under the protecting auspices of
the general government, with , that suc
cess which must pertain to oiir exertions,
that these articles will be afforded to the
consumer with a cheapness and of a qua
lity that will joperat to prevent their il
legal introduction intotbe country pm
abroad. ' They will be manufactured in
various parts of the country, .exchanged
for agricultural prbtlu'cts, and command,
the avenues to consumption . ' -)
y Is there any danger thatUhe merchant
of character and respectability, in. the U.
States, will do what is done in Europe by
those alone who are .destitute of both-
The relative situation of the United Spates
and the states of Europe, are so dissimilar,
that'what the; revenue officers, with their
hosts of -attendants, could not prevent
there, might be. effected; here with ease,
and without a dollar additional expense.
In the first place, vessels used for convey
ing goods from "Europe and Asia into the
United States, are of the first class ; of
course, they are valuable In the second
place, most of them i have goods for from
ten to one hundred individuals and, with
the exception of those from India, the
owners havej comparatively, but a small
interest ; in theucargo. Is there a shadow
of probability, therefore, that the owner
of the vessel,' and the several owners of
the goods, would agiee to have her, after
crossing the Atlantic, lie off the coast for
the purpose of - clandestine ly introducing
her cargo : hazarding their property, and
jeopardizing their character? In the third
place, those: 'embarked in ihe India trade,
we hope, have too high an estimate oi"
character and moral principle; to descend
so low ; if they Jiav'e not, the value of pro
perty that must necessarily be risked, is a
sufficic.nt guarantee orf their part. In the
fourth place,' if there' Is a.ri apprehension
' that goods ' would be sniuggled from the
vessel, after! she has arrived in port, it
must be indulged by those Only who are
unacquainted with our present revenue
laws. "With vigjlant appraisers and other
officers,' the thing would be irnpracticable.
In England and Franr the case: is far
otherwise. .The proximity of their coasts
is such, that' from, three to six hours sail
will carry them from one to the ether.
Consequently,, small craft, of little value,
and men who have no reputation to lose,
embark in it.;. They may. make their re
turns daily, and as their risk of loss is al
ways.small at any one time, people cf that
character are always to be found engaged
in it. ::SMp: . 'X'f -z-A'-'
Of. the alledged loss of' revenue, by a
dopting a newariff, we liave spoken, and
also of the errbras to high wages in this
countrywl .s to the cbjection, formerly
drawn from the extent1 of vacant lands in
the United States, it wears but a repul
sive aspect when it is recollected, that
we have neither foreign nor domestic mar
kets for bur surplus produce, and the in
ducements to cultivate the soil are dimi
nished instead of increased.:' ' ; 4
; In : regard tp the assertion made by the
oppose rs of the proposed tarinthat its ad
vocates meditated the . abolition : of ttifc
drawback system, we need only say, that
nothing of the kind has. been, oris, con
templated ; nor can tu Imputation be ac
counted for upon any principles bf fairness
or honor. A new tariff can,m no way,
jn j uriously' affect the exportat ion tf goods
einiiiea 10 ctpenture.:: ; S v
, W itn -.these views, we appeal to the !
sound arid sober sense of the people'. They1 1
are caneu upon to exercise ineir canaor
andrefltctiori. Tliey are - earhestlysolH
cited tb survey the pisent' cchditicii'o?
the countryo examinerthe causes which
have produced it the, ruinous consequen-
. ces which must inevitably result from pur
j suing our present poljcy and, the. relief
j thit would be reaU2ed4rtfendering he
great branches of labor more productive,
and; in protecting nemtagamst fbreien
ci np titioq. l ne cause can never,, be
i abandon
terniofj gbvernment lastsor it wast
tutea toanswer tne cans oi ne
f4'
watch'overtheir, welfare, iaridnbTCdress
tiieh . grievances. -It is a vcausethat u
if Anf Short tvitli tf : fntnrf CtrpnVth. . inde-
pendente, andjhappinessf4 K
'THE ) N ACiN Affi FIN ANCS&S
' HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, FEB. 6. ,
mttUM; upon, tne suojeci oj $ncyjeyt:
The Gommittee bf Ways and Means tb
whom were referred three resohitions of
the'Sd instant, .requiring
to nqj uueltndpprti v whj5tfer i n, their
opinion j the' permanent; revenue is ade
quatelto the expenses of the; government:;"
" whether any; measures are necessary tci
increase the revenue and if so, to report
thoserneasures'r andVto enquire int
theexpedlency pf prohibiting, br imposing
additional duties on, the importation ;of fo
reign; spirits, Jand imposing an fciseorl
domesticdistilled spirits' Report
,Thktcihey hayehadUheise imfiortant,
subjects Under their consideration, 8c have;
obtained pf rem" the ' several departments
all the information which the tofficers at
their .- head could furnish ; yet, such ar
the difigculties that present- themselves
inev. enter into ine aiscussion anu. uir
statements necessary4 to elucidate the sub
ject, ivitr. great dithdence, ' ,1 hey may
difter in opinion with gentlemen tor whose
talents they have: the highest respect, and,
in whpsei i'lteerity they have unbounded
confidence ; the subiecis,; one, however,'
on which; the; best friejnds may fairly differ'
Is the permanent revenue adequate tq
the efienses of the government?
The revenue is i 'main! V bottomed on the
dutiesj arising on .the; importations of fo
reign jocids r-rits, - therefore, dependant
on fortuitous circumstances, which cannot,
e a sil y - b foreseen, and which m ay tend j
to us increase- or up trcase..; i nere farq
some, however, which can, inadegree, b
annreciated. The tariffof 1816 was eX
pected to operate a loss to the. revenne
by giving what was considered at the time
sufneient encouragement to the manufact
tures of the country. A variety of causest
arising put oi excessive ana ruinous u
portatiorts, and. the time requiredlfor di
verting one' channel of , commerce or supj
plies into another, has, until lately,' pre
ventedf.be effect from being' materially;
felt, i The operation of that tariff is; now!
neginning to be known, ana tne perfect ,oi
the revenue is bebeved to be considerabl
its exenr is, nowever, not cnmpieici
developed Its operation on a few of th
princroal artkites may afford some idea o
the increase of 6ur manufactures, and the
consequent de crease of the revenue're
yultiiik'frbrn the duties on the imnbrta'tion
of such articles., 'r yi :V -t
: The tariffof 1816, increased the duty
on brown sugar about 20 per;;cerit. and
gave a protecting duty to that article, pf
three cents per pound. . No material def
crease hks, as yetresttlted to the revenue
tliercjfrbtn; ' The tariff, was enacted dur
ing the existence of the excise on domes-'
tic difetiljed spirits; and an additional duty
was iiriiposed for the protection of. the do
mestic article. The excise on imported
spirits yfj as repealed the duty! was con-;
tihued, and .the dqty on foreign spirits e-1
ceedsvat this t?me,;t he whole valueofthe
domestic, tlie average duty on the import
ed being 43 cents per gallon; "when thV
value! in the market of tlie: domestic does
not exceed 33 cents the gallon; .This has
tended J i is believed, to decrease, the
constmptitn:f'f foreign spirits, & of course
.the amount of the. revenue. Iu 1818, the
nett revenue from imported spirits,: after
deducting the debentures, amounted " to
2,646,1 1 6 dollars, & in 1819,.to 1,95125
dollars . : . Tvl -v:
:.THe ! tariff of 1816 raised the duties on
cottcfi and woollen cloths from 1 2 , per
cent.! the
rc umy imposea prior to tne' late j
25 per cent, and it : Value d all cot i
warJto
ton cloths , under a r cost of 25 cents the.
1
uajijjyardaith'bugh ;;'-)nje. cost aj& low;
vs si nts) as if they ' had actually cost
2ci-ntL .and charged the duty, thereon
accotdiigry Xhe result , has been ,that
cotton fjoodi i m pot t ed from ' India ; under
a cost of 25 cents tlie squarcji'ard,; pay a
cluty' exceeding 60 per, tf nt."on the ave
rage cot - of those ; heretofore irn ported
froiii that country, and above 40 percent.
on the average cost'bf similar goods whenI
Has had; a satutaryi ehect. on tiur infant
manafattbres bf.cottbn, whicrr beginitcr
be und : rstood by v the - man u fac t urersJ
tons (asre under a Cost df.25 ce'pts the
uare -y ai d, have almost ceaiitd for con
sunljjtwpif and thosej; fromvEurope lhave
dewjtascdi fit is ;belieyfd, tb,a cfisidera
.bleTtftent The coarse cottons of ur do-
mestic manufactures have ente
believe, -mW,theconsUmpt
tKin, nearly qual to the f wa'ntsf trieeo-i
plei ' -The increase M'h -wbolleii manur
facture has aff rded a considerabTe quan
tity bfwopllen' cloths for consumpticn, but
$ eTiayj ;np Jnforii.atfon onVwhic
importnt.artcieiIpf
tures &yde
won w na : tuuse Aerewioremjponea irom
4
d to lhe dis-
estimate
tphirLK; mitr nrl hpr&ft&r mm duies bfl
Those circumsncesrat
tresses cXtb tpp ;
ntirexportsvbeiog . 'li!'
me?ioh tffceti trre,eaftjt bf pa vfng.for; f.t
impoftaktxt j;
fnrnVv a'correct estimate "of the 'revenue ! -r I
Imports' eytjmatefion thwhch ha beea
rcce 5vd in former yearsT i '-'A ?,
"sirrahfe vi?W3 hh t Yf epmmitteen ; ;
hayedeenHedtpp spbmitiUhey 'y
nrbcfedni.wer-.rrt resolutions! I ; :S c
They are of opinion, thaitne reven ue
which will be tect'ved in ihe firesent vear, -
placefthefrevenrielwiHjn their, opinion,: '
during the:yearsl822; 1823, indl824,ic;
not only equaltoc the;eensof theJjo-'p
yernment but afford such a nrjplu. ap?- V
plicable Xo the pay men tof the loan of X he ' '
la$t ve;ar; and any tfyat may; j;authoriJ. : I
ed for this yearas, wtl. before .the, brt- y ! '
iay'pr'JrifluaSSifnll jaVjhe;v
mount borrowed; jThe HnuseMll reme'mit ;N
ber, that asthelipprnfitiw)lU8 -hayfe , "A
tiot- passed,' iht'rfl true fexrieiiRe of vyV; '
ebvernmehr cantiot' he corredlv stated--- V. i-.
Th e com i m i 1 1 ee; are cbni pl lep; erefpre, ;. x. t '
to bbttomf theinstaternenonitbe esHnat ;
ed" expenses, " as "submitted -th Congivss; ;-, ;;;.
reuced atleast one'and a half mrllions of
wnicn win. iL is connoennv weiitrvcu. uc
dollarsv-aM'liryi -r' l" A" '-; ;' v : .
It is now reduced to a cettamtv;, that
the actual receiptlffom the customs into
the treasury, durihghe yeari 1820, nave .
been?15,0051328 dollars wfich amount,"
it k humblyxonCeti yed,ma j e, safely1 re-
lied fori a sthe- receipts -for , thef present !
yeaftjThecpriimitteTe are bf opinion, that
i ne receipts orjcpif ijrom inai source
will exceed thatl amVnnf, iTHey ' farvtkl
that : opinion from, the following" circum
stances to wit : The bonds Tor duties im
th e Trea survamoun ted, on the 1 day
of October, 1820,;io; nearly the same sumrj
as those; in tne;l reasury.on th 1st ot UC
tobeir, rlS 19 ) thiatfrpTn; thoscl bf 18i9 , an;j
extraordinary deduct loa was - ma,de . by
the more tbari common amount to debenK
tures issued on -tjie resh ipmpt of goods
during the year : that! a, simdarmount
of drawbacks,! it is beUeverl , wjl hot'oc- :
curduring .the present jreai ;& of course,
that the revenue from, implrirts will be
greaterin 1821 than that of l20, & in this
opinion they are confirmed by the follow .
mg views of the; customs forithe. present
root. . .. t A J II .-..f !'.,'. v . f
:. Bonds, in ah e Treasury, on l!
J st-oi :oct ,'1820,Aly hv.fii:
From which! must he deducte
Bonds i rrecpverabfe,; gr,250,
Bi mds i h su jt, whi ch i t !f
may , not ; be, received
:
during
the
present
yearv:
750,(
v UUIIIO paiU 111 ;
quarter bri820v ;j .626,
iDebenmresactuiMly;
issued, prior to the 1st ?
Oct. on those bohds;a ii:i63.ddOl
s ueoentures ' ; which
may he issued on: the
same, estimated at
Estimated nett, pre ft
tnose. Donns, t 4 .y v rv,:
12,343,ifi
Add thereto tbe amount of
he '
receipts; into. the.Treasurv frlm-; ,f.
bonds taken during the last quiar
ter, of the year 1820, and takenjot V,v
to be 'akeri,v during the! wq suo- y
cedjng, quarters of 1821:hjch: 1
bottomed on the receipts into the ' "
Treasury for afttual receipts frpm I; v'v
bonds taken-duriiicr-the fbul-Ui &
quarter in 1819, and the first Ind '
.
year, the sumof,
43?,2C5
"The committee have submitted'fbe pre-
ceding view -of the custom's for 1821. for.
uiexonsiaeiTiuon jot, ine noupe, dui wouia,.
njot bewilling to pledge themselves for the, f
result ; the items 'they believe to be cor-
ectj and the present appearance of our
fcommerce; becomingt less I unfavorable,'
Warrants y)emjfitt-;Uefthat'te re
venue from custofns, fbr: 1821, wilt rioi be
less l th ah sixteen Ijmillions of .;doHarsii- r'
They, however, deem it more aafi to asV..
$ume the recepits of the- present; on that
f i ane preceamg year, anc tneretore SUQ
nitrthe; following statement! :: ! ';.':"
1 ;vJ hJkiJ ",' vv
t e -st; second and
third quarters of 1820: -V i-
see Secretary' report; 12,378,
113
iheurtharterL
2,626.
MS
i
Istateuient from the ' i
, treasury to your com.
.rnittee.assurned fis the
9
: ' v:;..yf.V . .r; ', i,.; '
receipt for:i821, h -1 15,005,
8:
? j Land,' agreeably to
yiereport ottne sec'y
ortheTreasury
ii internal taxesi
sarneR7;.,..
d:.
bV'
:kiT'lnAl
' ' r"
Bank dividend, by
fsame
. rosi ornce ana mci-
-!l
dental, receiptsfrnay
ne estimated at : ; ? ; i too
- ir.155,'.
"A-
it
n
rk
r
n
12
.1.
!
n
1 rf, i ,
, 1
i
'1
li
I
I
!
!
1
i
I.!
'til
. ft'.
: !'
if .
: 1. '
1
m